1

2

.

.

.

HeinOnline : International & Non-U.S. Law Journals

(http://www.heinonline.org).

( 2007. ) Proceedings of Novi Sad Faculty of Law EBSCO Academic Search Complete (http://www.ebscohost.com).

( 2005. )

(http://www.pf.uns.ac.rs).

.

3

UNIVERSITY OF NOVI SAD FACULTY OF LAW NOVI SAD

(SERBIA)

COLLECTED PAPERS

XLVIII 3 (2014)

, 2014. , XLVIII , . 3 (2014)

3 ISSN 0550-2179 eISSN 2406-1255

4

5

, ........................................ 9 , ? ................... 25 , , ................................................................................... 37 , ........................................................................ 55 , , ......................................................................................... 67 , ; , e ............................................................ 81 , : ......................................................................... 107 , ...................................... 129 , ................................................................................ 139 , ............................................ 153 . , 2011. ....................................................................................... 171 , : .......................................................... 189

6

, (c. th. 10, 1, 12) ...................................................................... 207 , ........ 221 . , ...................................................... 235 , ...... 265 , XIX ...... 279 , ................................................................................................. 291 , ........ 303 , ( ) .............................................................. 321 , .. 337 , .......................................... 351 , in vitro ..................................................................... 365 , ; , ..... 381 , ................................................ 395 , ...................................................................... 407 (18461858) .......................................................................................... 427

. , , , : ... 455

7

TABLE OF CONTENTS ore Popov, Ph.D., Full Professor Contribution to Economic Analysis of Climate Change .................................... 9 Dragan Milkov, Ph.D., Full Professor Public Agencies in Serbia Accidental Error or Bad Intention ........................ 25 Predrag Jovanovi, Ph.D., Full Professor Labour Law Treatment of Health, Work Ability and Personal Integrity of the Employees ................................................................................................ 37 Milo Marjanovi, Ph.D., Full Professor (retired) Sociological Concept of Generation .................................................................. 55 Danica Popov, Ph.D., Full Professor Protection, Landscaping and Regulation of Agricultural Land in Serbia .......... 67 Duan Nikoli, Ph.D., Full Professor; Tamara Gajinov, Ph.D. Student Conventional Agricultural Land Use and Immissions of Genetically Modified Organisms .......................................................................................... 81 Bernadet Borda, Ph.D., Full Professor Abolition of Exequatur for Judgments Requiring the Return of a Child in Practice: the Povse Case ................................................................................ 107 Marija Salma, Ph.D., Full Professor Electronic Communication in Civil Litigation ................................................... 129 Drago Divljak, Ph.D., Full Professor National Treatment in International Trade National Law and International Standards ....................................................................................... 139 Senad Jaarevi, Ph.D., Full Professor Labour Law and Communitarian Legal Standards ............................................ 153 Sneana S. Brki, Ph.D., Full Professor Discordance of the 2011 Criminal Procedure Code of Serbia with other Regulations ............................................................................................... 171 Sanja aji, Ph.D., Full Professor Remedies for Moral Damage before the European Court of Human Rights: Cyprus V. Turkey Case ...................................................................................... 189

8

Magdolna Si, Ph.D., Associate Professor In Regard to one Strayed Provision of the Theodosian Code (C. TH. 10, 1, 12) Protection of Forests in Ancient Rome ........................................................... 207 Tatjana Bugarski, Ph.D., Associate Professor The Jury and Assessment of Evidence Based on Freely Judicial Beliefs .......... 221 Slobodan P. Orlovi, Ph.D., Associate Professor How to Better Election System of Serbia .......................................................... 235 Zoran Lonar, Ph.D., Assistant Professor Delegated Affairs of State Administration in the Area of Environmental Protection .................................................................................. 265 Maa Kulauzov, Ph.D., Assistant Professor Legislation and Judicial Practice on Illegitimate Children in 19th Century Serbia ... 279 Dragutin Avramovi, Ph.D., Assistant Professor Human Rights on the Thin Red Line between Universality and Relativity ....... 291 Dragana ori, Ph.D., Assistant Professor Some Modern Ethical Dilemmas Regarding the Use of the Hippocratic Oath ....... 303 Bojan Tubi, Ph.D., Assistant Professor Access to International Justice (The Jurisdiction of International Courts) in the cases of Environmental Protection ........................................................... 321 Ivana Raki, Ph.D., Research Assistant Protection of Media Pluralism in the Republic of Serbia under the New Legislation ................................................................................................. 337 Cvjetana Cvjetkovi, Assistant Exchange of Information in the Field of Direct Taxation in the European Union Law and in the Practice of the European Court of Justice ................................. 351 Sandra Samardi, Assistant The Legal Status of in Vitro Embryos ............................................................... 365 Stefan Samardi, Assistant; Ivan Mili, Assistant Contradictions of The Misdemeanor Law in The Area Of Sanctions for Minors With Special Review to The Measures That Are of The Medical Character .......... 381 Luka Baturan, Assistant Lease of Agricultural Land in Public Ownership .............................................. 395 Ratko Radoevi, Assistant Organization of Administrative Judiciary .......................................................... 407 Miroslav Popovi, Ph.D. Organization of District Courts (18461858) .................................................... 427

BOOK REVIEW

Slobodan P. Orlovi, Ph.D., Associate Professor Darko Simovi, Dragutin Avramovi, Radomir Zekavica: Human Rights ........ 455

, 3/2014

9

504:33 doi:10.5937/zrpfns48-7215

,

1

:

- . - . , - - . . . . -. : ; - , - ; - - . . - .

1 ``, `` . 179079 e .

, (. 924)

10

: , , , - , , -, , , - , .

I

. - , - .

- . - . - , - - . - . .

- . - , , , . - ( , ) -2. - , 1974.3

2 1950.-1990. 500%, 100%. : Rainer Land, kologische Wirtschaftsentwicklung und soziale Teilhabe, Neue Gesellschaft, 5/2010, Bonn, . 35.

3 . - - - 3 12 . - . - .

, 3/2014

11

, - .

II

, , - - 4.

- , - . - - 5.

, - .

:

1. - - . - .

2. (economy of scale) .

3. , .

4 `` , (-- . ..) , - , . , .`` , - , ,2013, . 279.

5 : Weizscker, Amory, Lovins, Hunter, Faktor Vier: Doppelter Wohlstand, Hal-bierter Naturverbrauch, Droemersche Verlaganstalt, Mnchen, 1995.

, (. 924)

12

4. - -. - , -. , , 6.

-. , , . - . - -, - . , - .

. (- , , , .), . , .

. - .

, , :

) . ) - -

. ) -

,

6 : , , , 1/2012, . 409- 426.

, 3/2014

13

, - .7

- . , - .

. - . : , - . .

III

, . , - : - ?

, - - . . , - . 8.

-

7 Nicholas Stern, The Economics of Climate Change, American Economic Review, 98: 2, 2008, . 26.

8 Baer/Athanasiou/Karta, The Greenhouse Development Rights Framework- The right to development in a climate-constrained world-, Heinrich Bll Foundation, Nov. 2008, . 15.

, (. 924)

14

. - .

- , - - - - - - .

`` ,`` . - `` ``- - - - 2 . `` ``9 `` ``10, .

`` `` . - -, .: , , , -, , , . , -, , , - , , : , , .

, .

9 (Pritchett) je ```` ", , ", "a - , - 16 .`` Pritchett, L. 2003. Who is Not Poor? Proposing a Higher International Standard for Poverty. The Center for Global Development, 21(1): 123. http://www.cgdev.org/content/publications/detail/2758

10 1 , ````, 2 `` ``.

, 3/2014

15

`` ``11 . , . -, - 12.

- : `` `` .``13 - `` `` , .

, , - `` ``14. - 1990, `` ``15. .

11 `` 25 (16 - - ..), "" - 20 (.7,500 ). " " ``. Ba-er/Athanasiou/Karta, The Greenhouse Development rights Framework, The right to development in a climate-constrained world, Heinrich Bll Fondation, Nov. 2008, . . . 17.

12 70% `` `` 15% .

13 . 7500 Barr , . . . 18. 14 : Baer/Athanasiou/Karta, . . . 21. 15 7500 ,

, . : Lu, Xueyi, ed. 2002. Research Re-port on the Social Strata in Contemporary China. Beijing, China: Social Science Documentation Publishing House. : Xin Wang, Self-identity and Social Consciousness of the New Middle-income Stratum in China. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Politi-cal Science Association. 2005.

, (. 924)

16

, - - . - - .

- , - .

, , -, 16. `` 17`` , - .

, , - . `` ,`` - .

- . - , - - , - .

8 2007. 50% 2050. ,

16 , , 20 , 10 , 5 , .

17 , , 7500 . : Mc Kinsey Global Institute. 2007. The Bird of Gold: The Rise of Indias Consumer Market. May.http://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/pu-blications/india_consumer_market/

, 3/2014

17

, - 18.

2050. 80% 2 , , , .

, - . , , - ? , - , . . , -.

- : -; - , - ; . .

. , .

- - 19. .

18 . 80% 2050, - 80%, 2007 60%, . : Nicholas Stern, .. . 28.

19 : , - - -, , . 3/2011, . 29.

, (. 924)

18

20.

- 21. - - , - .

, 22 - , . , -, - .

- - , ``The European Union Emissions Trading Sheme (EUETS)`` , , , .

-: , - . . - , , (European Union Emissions Trading Scheme)23. 2013. 24.

20 : Faure, M./ Visser, M., Law and Economics of Environmental Crim: a Survey, May 2003. . 2.

21 FaureM., Compensation of non- pecuniary loss- an economic perspective, : Magnus, U./ Spier, ., European tort Law, Liber Amicorum for Helmut Koyiol, Frankfurt, Peter Lang, 2000, . 143-159.

22 , - . : , , , 3/2011, . 299- 312.

23 European Union Emissions Trading Sheme (EU ETS). 24 : . , -

- -, , . 3/2011, . 32-33.

, 3/2014

19

2027, , - . - ```` , , - - .

25. , , . , - 26.

IV

27- , , - , , - . - , - .

25 : .

26 : , , , . 4/2012, . 7-22.

27 2002, , 2007. 1 , , - , - ., , - . , - . - -, , , , .

, (. 924)

20

, - , - , -. 28, - .

- . , . , . - .

- , - , - , - . - - . , , , . - .

, 2050. , . - , - .

28 - Yvo de Boer, 10 - 100 . : Earth Negotiations Bulletin (ENB), Vol. 12, No. 318, 20, Nov. 2006, . 19.

, 3/2014

21

.

29 , , , -. - , . 30, - - 31.

. , - , . , , , , , - . - - .

, . . . - : , -, , , , .

29 6,12 17 - . 30 : Hans- Jochen Luhman/ Wolfgang Sterk, Klimaziele zu Hause erreichen, oder wo

es am billigsten ist? Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft, 2/2008, Bonn, 2008, .109. 31 `` Ivo de Boer-a,

, - - ``. Luhman/Sterk, .. . 109.

, (. 924)

22

, . - . , , , - .

- , , , . - , . , , - . , - . - .

V

- . - . , - . . - .

, - . - - - . , - .

, ,

, 3/2014

23

, , .

, - . , - .

, (. 924)

24

ore Popov, Ph.D., Full Professor University of Novi Sad Faculty of Law Novi Sad

Contribution to Economic Analysis of Climate Change

Abstract: Climate changes are global both in its causes and its consequen-ces. Each action related to climate changes that has ambitions to be successful must be organized on a global level with full international cooperation and un-derstanding. Those who are wealthier and bearing the greater responsibility for the high level of emissions those should take corresponding proportions in ef-forts to reduce emissions. There are three basic ways how to solve the economic problem of excessive emissions. The first is the taxation. The second is trade with the emission allowances. The third way is through the establishment of re-gulations and standards. Only measures, which include the right to sustainable development, can mobilize forces in the world that will lead the humanity, thro-ugh long-term transition, in the post-fossil era.

Key words: Climate changes, environment, emissions, responsibility for climate changes, development threshold, trade with emission allowances, taxes, standards, Kjoto- protocol, environmental protection.

, 3/2014

25

35.075(497.11) doi:10.5937/zrpfns48-7380

,

?1

: 2000. , - . , . , , -. , , , , . - -, . , .

: , , , , .

1.

, -. - .

1 - ( ), : .

, ? (. 2536)

26

- , . , , . , , , . - . , .

, 2000. , - . , , . , , , . , - .

2.

, . - . , - , . , 1990. , -.( .2). , , ( - , .)3. .

2006. . , ( )4.

2 - , , . 1/1990, . 94, . 1.

3 , . 4. 4 , , . 98/2006, .

136, . 2.

, 3/2014

27

, , . , () -. , , - . - .

.5

, , . , , .6 - , - , -, , , . , - , ?

. - , . - , - . -, , , - . , - , , , . , -, - .

- , . , , - 2005.

5 - , . 79/2005, 101/2007, 95/2010 99/2014, . 22.

6 , . 29, . 2.

, ? (. 2536)

28

. . , - -, . , - , , . , (), , - . , , . , , . , - , : - , - , - .7

- . , , 2004. -, . , - , . , , !? , 2012. , , . , , - , .8

7 , , , () . - ? , 2014. . ! (Jean Louis de Lolme) , , . , , - .

8 . , - , 2/2012, 391-400.

, 3/2014

29

, 2004. , , - - , 2005. .9

3.

- , , .

. , , , , .10 15 , . , . .11

, - . (independent executive branch agencies), - (independent regulatory agencies). , , -. , .12

, - 1787. . 1789. , - .13 , . , , -.

9 - , , . 18/2005.

10 Johnson C. Scott, Administrative Agencies: A Comparison of New Hampshire and Fe-deral Agencies History, Structure and Rulemaking Requirements , Pierce Law Review, Vol 4, Nr. 3, University of New Hampshire, 2006., 438.

11 Ibid., 439. 12 Ibid. 13 Ibid., 436.

, ? (. 2536)

30

, , .14 -, - 1946. - . , ''agency'' means each aut-hority of the Government of the United States, whether or not it is within or su-bject to review by another agency, but does not include - (A) the Congress; (B) the courts of the United States; (C) the governments of the territories or posses-sions of the United States; (D) the government of the District of Columbia.15 1960. - , , . , - . - : ( ) , -, , , , .

, - , , , , .

. , , , , .16 15 , . , . .17

, - . (independent executive branch agencies), - (independent regulatory agencies). , , -. , .18

14 Alfred C. Aman, Jr. William T. Mayton, Administrative Law, 2. izdanje, St. Paul, Minn., 2011., 1.

15 5 U.S. Code 551. 16 J. C. Scott, 438. 17 Ibid., 439. 18 Ibid.

, 3/2014

31

, , 2000. , , - , - . , - , , - , ?19 - , , . , , , !

, - - , (Verwaltungsorgan). - (administration), , . , - agency. , , . - , - , . , .

2004. 2005. , - - (. - , , .). , , ,

19 - . .

, ? (. 2536)

32

, - . 2012. -, .20 : , (autorits administratives indpendantes) - - (lexercice dune responsabilit structurante dans la mise en uvre dune politique publique nationale). ( , , ). , , , - - . , , . , .

4.

, , - , -. , . , - ! , , - , - - , - (sic!) .21 ?! , -

20 Conseil dtat, tude annuelle pour 2012, Les agences : une nouvelle gestion publi-que?

21 , . 2, . 1.

, 3/2014

33

?! !

, , - . , . - -, . , , , , . -- .

5. ,

, (New Public management). - (Christopher Hood), , A public management for all season, 1991. .22 - , :

1. ; 2. -,

, ;

3. , ;

4. , , .

- , , - : agenci-fication, . , , . - . ,

22 Public Administration Vol. 69, 1991., 3-19, Royal Institute of Public Administra-tion ISSN 0033-3298.

, ? (. 2536)

34

. -. , -, , , - . , , -, , - . , , ? . ? - ?

- ( - , , ) . : fikare , , - ( , , ). , , . , . ? ? ? , ? ? (?) , - , -! , , , ! , , , , , . , , , , , . ( -) , , ? , .

, 3/2014

35

. , , . , : . , . -, , !

6.

- , -. , , - , . , . , .

, , , , ( ) . , , , . , - , . , : , . , -, - . , ( ).

, , : , .

, ? (. 2536)

36

Dragan Milkov, Ph.D., Full Professor University of Novi Sad Faculty of Law Novi Sad

Public Agencies in Serbia Accidental Error or Bad Intention

Abstract: English term "agency" has appeared in the Serbian legal system after the political changes in 2000. At first, the Law on Ministries in 2004 crea-ted bodies of state administration under the name of the agency and administra-tive organizations and in 2005 has been passed the Law on Public Agencies, which provides agencies as autonomous entities that are not directly part of the state administration. In addition, in the last ten years in Serbia was created a whole range of subjects of different legal status under the name of the agency.

It should be borne in mind that the organization and structure of public administration in Serbia are mostly based on the Germanic tradition and that Serbia has long used the German term for persons performing administrative activities: "Verwaltungsorgan". Without any objective need, in addition to tra-ditional forms of bodies performing administrative activities in Serbia has been created a new form called the agency. This has only brought the confusion into by then relatively harmonized system of governance structures, where the name of the former administration and some other subjects changed to agencies and some new, who previously did not exist, have been also created. This has led to the growth of covert administration.

Agency name is not unknown in the world and in the US is used since the 18th century. However, instead of the name in English is translated into Serbian language in an adapted way, as it corresponds to the traditional Serbian termi-nology, this accidental error later turned into a bad intention of creating an ever-larger number of entities called agency.

Key words: agencies, bodies of state administration, organization of state administration, structure of administration, agencification

, 3/2014

37

331.522.4 doi:10.5937/zrpfns48-7376

,

, *

: - . , - . . , - -. . , - . , - , - -. , , , ( ) -, ,, ( , , -, .).

: , , -, , , , , -.

* 2014. , - , .17097, - .

, ,... (. 3754)

38

1. , -

- , , . - . -, . () . () ( - , (-).

, , , - . ( , , ), , - . , , , .

, - . . , -, . - , - . - . (, ) . -. .

, ( ), ( ) , - ( - ) .

, , , . , () . . , .

, (, -, , ), -

, 3/2014

39

- . , , . - , - . - .1 - .

2. ,

. , , - . , -.

: ; ; . -, : (1) - - ; (2) , ; (3) , , .2 , , . - ( ), , .

. , , . , () , . , , . -. , ( ), - , .

1 , ( , , , 1982, ..92-106.), : (1) ; (2) ; (3) ; (4) ; (5) ; (6) .

2 : , , , -, 1986, .108.

, ,... (. 3754)

40

, , , ( ) .

, -, . -, - , , .3

() , . , , - . 15 . -, , , , . . , . , - . , (. ). () . , - (18 ). . (-, , , , .). - , , - - . , - . - , , (15 ), - , , ( ), , - . .

, , - . - . 5 - 1919, 138 -

3 , ., .114.

, 3/2014

41

1973. , () - ( ) - ( ; ; - .).

- () . 1959. ( 9) , - , ( 10) .

- (. 138) , - 15 . (. 37 ). , , , 12 15 . , , - , - , 18 . - , , (-) , 15 . , , , - .4

( 18 )5 , -, - ( - ). - . : (1) -

4 6 7,5 , - , . 62/2003, 4 90.

5 ( 37,....98/06.) ( 11, ..,. 18/2005; 72/2011), 18 .

, ,... (. 3754)

42

, ( ) , (2) - (, ) . , - .

, - : (1) - , ; (2) - (3) - .

15 , , . , . - ( , , .), , , .

3.

() -. , . . , ., , - . (-) , - . , , , () - . - , .

, - , . , , (, ) - , , , . , , ( ,

, 3/2014

43

, ). , - , .

, - . - , (, , ).

, - , . , , , , - . , , , , - . - . , - . , - , . . .6

, , . , , , . , -, .7

. , (- ), . , . . , . , , . , - , , , -

6 Georg Jelinek, , , 1998, .46.

, ,... (. 3754)

44

, . , , . - , , .8 , , - . , .

, - , .

, . , -, . - , ( , , .).

: (1) - , ; (2) -- , ; (3) - , ( : , , ); (4) , - - . - - , - . - , . , - . , , -- - . , , , , - ( , -

7 , , 1985, .832. 8 , , .833.

, 3/2014

45

).9 -, , , .

, , - . , , - . , - ( ) () . , ( - ). , - , , . , -. . , (strictum ius), - -. , - - . - , - . - -

9 : ; - ; , , , , . : .

, - . , , , , .

- , . ( ) , , .

- , - . - , .

, ,... (. 3754)

46

.10 , () - .

, , , - - . , , . - , - - . (sumum ius- sumum iniuria).11

, -, , . - ( ) - . , (strictum ius) , - - , - , , - .12 . , - : (1) ; (2) - ; (3) - . , - . -, . , , - . - : -; -, -; . , -. , -, , , - .13 , -

11 . , , , ,1996, .88. 12 Ibidem 13 .. , ,, , 1969, .5.

, 3/2014

47

, , - .

, , , . : (1) ; (2) ; (3) - . - ( -, .). . - .

( , .). , - . , - . , - - .14 , -, , - .

, - - . , , - , -, , ( ). , - : (1) ; (2) - ; (3) ; (4) ; (5) .

, . - , , . , , - .15

14 , , , 1999, .238. 15 , .., .11/25.

, ,... (. 3754)

48

(, ), ( -, ), ( -), . , . .

, () . . - , , - . - .

4.

. , - -, , , 2003. - . - , . - . - . - , - . - ,16 -- ( - - ( ), , - . , -, ( ). .

16 - , , .125/2004.

17 , , .101/2005

, 3/2014

49

, - - - - . - , . , -, , .

, . , - - .17

, . - , .

- : (1) ; (2) (3) ; (4) ; (5) ; (6) - ; (7) .

(1) - , - , , .

(2) , - . - -, , , -, , , - - / . : 1) , , - ; 2) , , ; 3) , , , , - ; 4) , - ; 5) , .

: 1) - ; 2) ; 3)

, ,... (. 3754)

50

; 4) ; 5) - ; 6) .

(3) : 1) ; 2) - , .; 3) , ; 4) ; 5) - (, .); 6) - , 7) , .

(4) , - , . - .

: 1) - ; 2) ; 3) - ; 4) , -, - , - ( ); 5) , , ;

6) , - ; 7) , , - , ;18 8) -; 9) .

18 (. 82.) , , - , - , , - .

, 3/2014

51

: 1) - , , , ; 2) , , - , , , ; 3) -, ; 4) ; (5) , , , , - .

(5) - . . .

: (1) ( ); (2) , , - ( ); (3) - , ; (4) - , , , , - .

( ), : (1) , ; (2) , ; (3) - , ; (4) , - , ( ); (5) -, , ;

(6) , , . , ,

, ,... (. 3754)

52

, .19 - ( ) , - .

- , - , , - . , - , . , : ; ; - ; ; - , ; ; ; .

(7) : (1) ; (2) ; (3) .

1) .

2) . 50 . - .

, : 1) ; 2) - ; 3) ; 4) - , ;

19 , , , , , .

, 3/2014

53

5) .

, : 1) - ; 2) -; 3) , , . , - , , .

, , , - , -.

3) , , , , . -, , - - , -, -, , , , , .

, ,... (. 3754)

54

Predrag Jovanovi, Ph.D., Full Professor University of Novi Sad Faculty of Law Novi Sad

Labour Law Treatment of Health, Work Ability and Personal Integrity of the Employees

Abstract: Health and working ability are assumptions of entering into and the existence of labour relations. The purpose of entering into and the existence of labour relations is in the organised and meaningful work, in the interest of the employer and the employee. The main obligation of the employee is to do their work personally in accordance with their health and work abilities. With regards to the said abilities, the employee is accepted to the work, and protec-tion and maintaining of these abilities is the assumption of the survival and long lasting of the employment. This makes legitimate the need that the health and work ability be protected by law in a suitable way. To that effect, we can talk about protection of health of the employees and safety at work. Since health does not only mean the absence of illness, but also the overall social security of the employees at work and in connection with work, this and issue of insurance of different risks that follow work of the employee fall into measures of health protection. Finally, not only manpower, as an organic unity of health and work abilities, takes part in labour relations, but also the entire personality of the em-ployee with the overall personal (moral and ethical) integrity, which also on its part requires appropriate labour law treatment and protection (ban on discri-mination, harassment, abuse, protection of personal data, etc.)

Key words: health ability, work ability, personal integrity, protection at work, employing, labour relations, employees, employer

, 3/2014

55

316.35 doi:10.5937/zrpfns48-7018

,

1

: - , . - - , . , , - . . . - kao , , . - , . - -, , , .

: , , , , . ( generatio , , ) -

, , , . , , - .2

1 ( ) .

2 Socioloki leksikon, Beograd, 1982, s. 457 - 458; Socioloki renik, Beograd, 2007, s. 161; T. Kulji, 'Problem generacija': nastanak, sadraj i aktuelnost ogleda Karla Manhajma, So-ciologija, 3/2007, s. 224.

, (. 5566)

56

. -, , , -. . , - , 33 . - , , , . , - (, , ) , , . , - (), -, , . , -, .

, (, , , , -, , ). . -, , - , - , , ( - , I II ).

, -, - . - ( 15 50 ) , . , - , , . , - , , , - - . - , - , -, .

, -, . -

, 3/2014

57

, 1789. . . 18. , . - , , - . , , -, , . , , , . - . , , - , -, - . . -, . 19. , - , - . - , - . , 1960-, . - . 1990-, , - , - , 1920-. - . , . (- ) .

, , - , . 1) - 1940-, , , . 2) , 1960-, -

, (. 5566)

58

, ( 1968) - ( ), . 3) 1989, - , . 4) E-mail 21. , 1990-.3

. - - . -.4 14- . - . , - ( , -). , , . , . , -, -, - , . , - . , - , , , -, .

, . , , , - - ( 10 11 ) - , - .

, , . -

3 T. Kulji, . , . 223 248; T. Kulji, Istorijske, politike i herojske generacije, Filozofija i drutvo, 1/2008, s. 69 107; T. Kulji, Sociologija generacije, Beograd, 2009.

4 ( . ), , 2004; Socioloki renik, Beograd, 2007, s. 81 83; . , , - , 1990; . Pijae, Psihologija deteta, S. Karlovci Novi Sad, 1990; ; . , - , , 1989; . , , , 2008; . . , , , 5/2010, . 143 160.

, 3/2014

59

, . - . . - . - , - , .

- . - (, - ) . - . . , - . -, , . , - . , . -, , , , .

1989. - , .5 , , , .

(, ) 14. 27. , 30, 35 . , , , . - teenager 13 19 (thir-teen nineteen), , . - 12 21. , - . , -, , (14 - 16)

5 ( . ) , 2001.

, (. 5566)

60

(16 18 ) , 18 - 21. , , . , - , , .

, . - , - . , , (), - . , - , , . - , , , - . - , , . , ( 14 27 ) , , , , . , , .

, .

(, 68-, , ). , , - 20. . - . - .

, - , - (, ) , - ( ), . . - ( - ) ,

, 3/2014

61

. - , - (), . - : , , , , -, (, , , , ). , , - ( , ).

, , , , , . - - - , , -, .

- , , , , (). - . (12.08.2014) - 51% -. , , . -, , , . . - , , . - .6

6 A. Mili, Zagonetka omladine: teorija i istorija omladinske strukture, Beograd Zagreb, 1987; S. Mihailovi (ur), Mladi zagubleni u tranziciji; Beograd, 2004; . , . , -, 2012; . , : , , 1991; J. Stepanovi M. Vulenovi D. Plut, Obrasci ponaanja mladih tokom slobodnog vre-mena, Sociologija, 3/2009, s. 247 262.

, (. 5566)

62

27 65 ,

45 , . . , , - . , - ( ) .

, - . - . - -. -, . - ( ) , , , , - , ( - 15 49 ). , -, , - , , . - : , , , , -, , , , . -, , , , .

-. , , . - . - , - ( ). , - , ( ). - . , , .

, 3/2014

63

, - . ( -) , . , ( ), - .

, - . ( ) , , . , - , , -. , , , , .7

65 . 75- , . 80- , 95- 100- -. - , . , . 115 - , , . , - . 1950- , 340 , 21. . - 82. . , , . , - , .

, - ,

7 Srednje godine, http://www.mojezdravlje.net; Kriza srednjih godina: pomjena ili depe-sija, www.centar-zdravlja.net ; Kriza srednjih godina, www.pharmamedica.rs; Sendvi gen-eracija, http://zivot.krstarica.com .

, (. 5566)

64

. , . , , - , , - . , , .8

() , , . - ( ) , -, , , . , - , .

- . - . -, . - . - . - . .

- . , , - . - , - . - - , . , , -

8 ( 15 24 ) 13,8% 17,8%. (-) .

, 3/2014

65

( ) , - ( , geron ). - , , - -. -, , , . , . . , . -, , , , -, - . - , . , . - , . , . , .

, , -. , . - . 1. - . : - , , - . - .9

9 . ., , , 3/2008, . 577 - 584; . . , -, - , - , , 2006, . 317 322; M. ivkovi, Starost u Jugoslaviji. Gerontoloko-socioloka studija, Ni Beograd, 1973;. V. St. Erlich, Stariji i mlai, Sociologija sela, 37-38/1972 , s. 26 - 36; V. Erlich, Obespravljena generacija, Sociologija, 3/1971, s. 489 - 498; Klubovi za stara lica Centar za kunu negu, Beograd, 1973; Organizacija strunog rada u domovima za stara lica (zbornik radova), Beograd, 1973.

, (. 5566)

66

Milo Marjanovi, Ph.D., Full Professor (retired) University of Novi Sad Faculty of Law Novi Sad

Sociological Concept of Generation

Abstract: Sociological concept of generation should be distinguished from biological and statistical, and they discussed all three of its meaning. In a so-ciological sense, it is characterized by a common historical experience that has its own internal and external, subjective and objective dimension. In sociology it was introduced by Dilthey, one of the main representatives of historicism, and which is characterized by discontinuous conception of history and emphasizing specificity of cultural epochs. In contemporary sociology, this concept was reaf-firmed under the strong influence of Mannheim who argued that the generation is in the range of analytical categories of class and nation. The major historical generations in our society are pointed. Four generations are considered as the main age groups but also as social constructs - children, youth, middle aged and old people. Their status in the traditional and contemporary, especially in our society is pointed. In the research of generation and its main forms have formed a special sociological disciplines, except for the middle-aged who are, as a generation, at least sociologically studied.

Key words: generation, children, young, middle-aged, old people.

, 3/2014

67

349.41(497.11) doi:10.5937/zrpfns48-7247

,

,

1

: , , - , , . . , , - - , - , - . - : - ; ; ; . , . - , , : , . , , .

1 , - , . 179097 .

, , ... (. 6780)

68

: , , .

, ,

. - , ( ).2

, - . . : , , , , , -, , , . - : , , , .3

0,7 , 0,46 . , (71% : 29%).4

60% - ( 82%). , - , - ( ) , - , .5

5.06 - 71% ( , ), 29% ( ). -

2 , . , . 62/2006, 65/2008 . 41/2009.

3 , .2. 1 2. 4 2014-

2024. . , . 85/2014. , 2. 5 2010- 2020. . .

88/2010. 5 (1.1. 1.1.1).

, 3/2014

69

3,3 65% 7% -.6

- , . 65,7 , 4,5 13,5 - , 50 , 133,7 . - : , - , - .7

, . , . - - . - . - -.

, - , , -: , , - ; -; - ; , - ; - ; ; - .

6 , , 2014 - 2024. . 3.

7 2010 2020. 5, (1.1. 1.1.1.)

, , ... (. 6780)

70

-.

, . - , - .8

- , .9

- , - . , , .10

- .11

: 1. -

; 2. ; 3.

; 4. -

; 5. 6. .12

8 , . 5-14. 9 , . -

. 135/2004. . 2(2). -, - , . , . 88/2010. . 2(5). , .

10 , . . . 2(1). 11 , . . . 2.(4) .15.

, 3/2014

71

1. , . , , , , , . -, , . - , , , . - . - , .13

- . , . : -, . . - , . - , . . -. , . . - , . , . , - .

12 , . 16 29. 13 , . 2(11),16,17.

, , ... (. 6780)

72

. - . , , - . - -.

- : - , - , . , , - , .14

2. , : - ; ; ; - ; ; ; ; , .

. -: 10%, - 25% . - , -

14 Jonathan M. Harris, , -, 2009. . 247.

, 3/2014

73

, . . - 4% , - . - .15

- 2012. 6296 -. - .16

-. (GLASOD Global Asses-sment of Soil Degradation) -, 30 50 % , - .17

50 - , . 20 , 3 -.18

. -, . 10 20 . 16 - . , , 20 40 .19

630.000 -. 45% -

15 , .19. 16 2012. ,

, , 2013. . 29. 17 Oldeman, L.R. et al., Global Assessment of soil degradation, Wagenigen, Nederlands:

IRSIC/UNEP 1990. p. 126. 18 The State of Soil in European Commission, 2012. ,

2012. . , , 2013. .5. 19 Pimentel, David, ed. World Soil Erosion and Conservation, Cambridge, UK. Cambridge

Univresity Press, 1993. p. 98.

, , ... (. 6780)

74

(0-2% ). 3,8 - -.20

, , - . .

- -, - .21 - (Proposal for a Soil Framework Directive COM (2006) 232). . 22

3. - . - - : - - , ; - , , - ; - -. - - .. - - .

20 2012. , . . . 5. 21 . , . 88/2010. 22

: (. , 57/2008), - (. , 22/2009), (. , . 12/2010).

, 3/2014

75

: - 200 - ; - - ; - , , -, ; ; - ; , ; - - ; - .23

2020., , , - .24

4. . .

5. , , . - - , . - .

6. - : , , , . - .25

- , , .

23 , . 22 - 27 24 2020. , , 2011. . 12. 25 , . 27 - 29.

, , ... (. 6780)

76

. () , - ,26

(. -) , , - , , . ( - ), ( - ).

- - . -, , , .

50% () , - .27

: 1. -

; 2. ; 3. ; 4. ( -

, , .) , -, -;

5. .

(. ).

, , . - , .

26 - , . , . , , , 2009. . 134.

27 2020. , , 2011. . , 8.

, 3/2014

77

. , - , , - .

, , , . - .

10% - , - 20% . - , .

- , - , - , , - - . - - 15 .

.28

, , - .29

28 , . 31 47.

29 - . - ,

, , ... (. 6780)

78

- . : -; ; - ; - ( ). - -.30

, - , . .

, , - . - .

, - , - , - ( . 60-75).

- - . - , , .

, , - - . : -; - e, . , . 48.

30 , . 30 - 58.

, 3/2014

79

; - , - ; -, ; , , - , , - .31

31 , . 76-77.

, , ... (. 6780)

80

Danica Popov, Ph.D., Full Professor University of Novi Sad Faculty of Law Novi Sad

Protection, Landscaping and Regulation of Agricultural Land in Serbia

Abstract: The subject of this article is protection, landscaping and regula-tion on agricultural land, based on The Agriculture Land Law in Serbia.

Land is besides water and air the basic component of the environment. Bearing in mind the long-term processes of creation and development, land is the conditionally renewable resources. Land use, particularly in agricultural production, there is often a balance disorder of certain factors, which inevitably leads of damage. Land is in the nature of a slow learner, but in the process of degradation quickly destroyed.

The main impact on land, recognized in the EU and candidate countries include erosion, reduction in organic matter, contamination (local and diffuse), occupation of land by building (buildings road), compaction floods and avalan-ches, reduction of soil biodiversity and salinization.

Inventory of the state of pollution and damage to land, the establishment of permanent monitoring and reporting system requirement for developing strate-gies and selection of measures of quality care and prevention of negative pro-cesses.

The measures of landscaping in The Agricultural land Law are: linking of land plots, voluntary grouping of lad plots and melioration of land.

The owner of agricultural land has an obligation to cultivate the land in accordance with the code of good agricultural practice, prescribed by the Law.

Key words: protection of agricultural land, landscaping of agricultural land, regulation of agricultural land, The Agricultural Land Law

, 3/2014

81

347.453.1:504.3 doi:10.5937/zrpfns48-7414

, ,

E 1

: -

. . privilegia odiosa. , , - . O . , , . , . , -, . (). , , , .

. ( ), ( -

1 , , 179079, . . : 1, 2, 3, 4, 10. : 5, 6, 7, 8 9.

; , ... (. 81105)

82

), -, ( ).

- - , , - , , - . je - . - .

. - - . - - .

: , , , , .

1. ,

, , , -. 2. - - , - (). , - . . (, ), , , , , . . , -. - , , -

2 .: (: ), : , (. ), - , , 2009, . 15 25.

, 3/2014

83

, -, .

2.

2.1. -

, - . (ius possidendi), (ius utendi) (ius disponendi). (erga omnes), , (contra omnes). -, (ius excludendi tertii). . -, , , . , , .

, (privilegia odiosa). - . , . , , .

, , (). - . , , , , -. , - pro futuro3. , -. 4.

3 . .: Carleton Kemp Allen, Law in the Ma-king, Oxford 1964. 1

4 : , , XI - , , 2013, 185 .

; , ... (. 81105)

84

- . , / - , , . - . , . - , , , . . . - , - , .

- . , , , - , - , .5. .

2.2.

XX , Lise-

lotte Hauer v. Land Rheinland-Pfalz (C 44/79)6 - , - 1162/767. , : 1 , . , - , . - : , - [ ..]. , -

5 .: .42, . 2 ; . 14, . 2 43, 2, 1 2 .

6 , / European Lawyer Journal, 1/2007, 167-176, : .

7 . 2776/78.

, 3/2014

85

, , - . -, , . , . 1162/76, . , , Internationale Handelgesellschaft (1970), -, , . - , - , , , - . , - -, (: ).

cai - Regione autonoma Friuli-Venezia Gi-ulia v. Agenzia regionale per lo sviluppo rurale (C-347/03), - , - . , [ ..]. 8.

2.3.

- , 9.

- 1980. . , -

8 , / European Lawyer Journal, 3/2006, 169-182, : .

9 .: .58, . 2 3 .

; , ... (. 81105)

86

10. , - - , - ( , , , , , , .) , 11.

1978. - , , -(...) - , . , - 12 .

-, , .

3. -

, , - . , -. - , - 13.

, - . () , . .

10 .: . 4 - . 11 .: . 4 - . 12 .: . 156, . 1, 3 4 . 13 .: United Nations Environment Programme - UNEP: GEO 5 - Global nvironment

utlook - Environment for the future we want, Nairobi 2012, 65-96.

, 3/2014

87

- 14 - , , 15. - - . , . - - , , 16. , , . - - .

17, 18 -.

, . - , , .

4.

4.1.

(conventional agricultu-re, conventional farming) - , , , - . - , -

14 ( , 62/2006). 15 .: . 15 . 16 .: 59 2 83, 2 . 17 .: . 16 22 . 18 .: . 18, 21 30 .

; , ... (. 81105)

88

, -. , - 19. . - . -, , : 1. ( ); 2. , - ; 3. ; 4. - (); 5. . , -, : , . - , (-) .

4.2.

. - (alternative agriculture)20. - () (organic agriculture), . - (sustainable agriculture)21.

, () (GMO agriculture). , . , , . , , - .

4.2.1.

, .

19 .: Towards a Green Economy Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication, United Nations Environment Programme, 2011, 40.

20 .: Curtis E. Beus Riley E. Dunlap, Conventional versus Alternative Agriculture The Paradigmatic Roots of Debate, Rural Sociology, 55(4)/1990, 590-616.

21 . , , . .: C. E. Beus, R. E. Dunlap, 594.

, 3/2014

89

, , - , . - , , , . - (traditional agriculture).

- , , - (natural agriculture), - (do nothing), . , - . .

4.2.2.

, , , , , . , - , , , . , . , - , -. . , , , -, 22. , - . , - 23.

4.2.3.

- (genetically modified crops) - . -

22 .: E. Lichtfouse, et al., Agronomy for Sustainable Agriculture:Reviw, : Sustainable Agriculture, (d.: E. Lichtfouse, et. al.), Springer, Dodrecht Heidelberg 2009, 1.

23 .: The greening of agricutlure, : Towards a Green Economy, 42.

; , ... (. 81105)

90

, - , . , - . 24.

, . -. , . , . - .

4.2.4.

. , , - . - , - , , . , . , . . - - . . - . , () - , . - - ( )25.

24 .: (Carthagena Protocol on Biosa-fety) 2001. (Convention on Biological Diversity) 1992.

25 8. .

, 3/2014

91

, , . - - ( ), ( -), -, ( ).

. - . - . -26 . -, .

4.2.5.

. . -, . , - , - . 27. 28.

, - - , , - . , - .

, , . , -

26 Anja Gerdung, Germans Liability Law for GMO Cultivation, Sustainability Council of New Zealand, Wellington, 2006, 7.

27 .: . 6 ( , 30/2010). 28 .: . 2 (

, 41/2009).

; , ... (. 81105)

92

, , (), ()29.

, ( , ) , . - . - - -, - 30.

5.

,

(transgenic pollen) (transgenic seds) - .

, . , . , - . , .

, , .31 - , .32 , . - -

29 .: , From liability for immissio to liability for emissions, , 1/2006, 405-407.

30 .: Michale Faure, Andri Wibisana, Lia-bility in Cases of Damage from GMOs: An Economic Perspective, Rotterdam Institute of Law and Economics Working Paper Series 9/2008, 11 i dr.

31 Kanchana Kariyawasam, Legal Liability, Intellectual Property and Genetically Modified Crops: Their Impact on World Agriculture, Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, 3/2010. 463.

32 Liability and Compensation Schemes for Damage Resulting from the Presence of Ge-netically Modified Organisms in Non-GM Crops, Anex I, Country Reports, (ed. Bernard Koch), 2007. 11.

, 3/2014

93

. - .

6.

, .33 , . , , - , .

, -, , , . - 81034, . - . , - . , - . - , , , .

1990. , Flavr Savr (CGN-89564-2) Calgene. 1996. .

33 a - 810 , , - 49 , , . 27 -, 8 , 7 , , , . , 2010. , , 2011. .

34 810. - , - . Bayer Crop Science, BASF GE - , . , - .

; , ... (. 81105)

94

. , , , , .

- . .

(BGB) 1896. 35. - (Gentechnikgesetz)36 , - , , , .

(BGB) 1811. - (Gentechnikgesetz37) 1994. , , , , . , . , , ,

35 906, . 1 BGB- , , , , , , , , - . , - . - , .

36 .: . 36. 1990. , 1993, 2010. 2013. . ( : Bundestministerium der Justiz und Verbraucherscutz, http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gentg/)

37 1998, 2001, 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006. 2012. . ( : Bundestministerium fr Gensudheit, http://www.bmg.gv.at/home/.)

, 3/2014

95

. -, .38 - , - . , .

, - , , , , , -, . , - . , , - .39 - , - , - .

nuisance40 trespass.41 , - , , (Raylands v. Fletcher),42

38 Monika Hinteregger, Elke Joeinig, Economic Loss Caused by GMOs in Austria, Tort and Insurance Law, 24/2008, 64.

39 , . troubles de voisinage , . , , , 1382, 1383 Code civil-a. - .: -, , , 1975, 60-61.

40 Nuisance . . .

41 Trespass , . .

42 , , , . - .

; , ... (. 81105)

96

(negligence).43 , .44

7.

, - . - , , .45 , - .46

43 : (duty and care), , .

44 .: Richard Boadi, Managing Liability Associated with Genetticaly Modified Crops, 4-6 ( : http://www.iphandbook.org/handbook/ch14/p05/. 15. 2014). - Marsh v. Baxter [2014] WASC 187 (CIV 1561 of 2012). - . , , . 150 , (Kenneth Martin) (Michael Baxter) , . . , Hoffman v. Monsanto Canada Inc 2005 SKQB 225 (CanLII) - (Saskatchewan) (Monsanto) (Bayer Crop Science Inc.) . , nuisance, trespass, , ( ), .

45 .: Bryan Endres, Revising Seed Purity Laws to Account for the Adventitious Presence of Genetically Modified Varieties: A First Step Towards Coexistence, 2-3. ( : http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/endres_seedpurity.pdf 20. - 2014.) .

46 - , , - .

, 3/2014

97

. - .

, - . , , , - .

.47 150 , 300 , .48 , 0,9% .

- . - . , - . (National organic program) , . , - -, . , - (Association of Official Seed Certifying Agencies) -. , - -. , , . , , - . , - .

47 . 48 Agricultural Biotecnology Annual (Germany), 5-6 ( : http://gain.fas.usda.gov/

Recent%20GAIN%20 Publications /Agricultural%20Biotechnology% 20Annual_Berlin_Germany_ 4-24-2014.pdf 01. 2014.).

; , ... (. 81105)

98

, - 5% . , 0,9% . - . - 2003. 49 - . , , . , 0,9% , , - .50

8.

(-) , , -, , . , 51 , , .

- , 2001/18.52 ,53 - .54 - , , . , 2001/18 , -

49 Genetically Engineered Crop and Animal Farmer Protection Act of 2003. 50 B. Endres, 33. 51 Cartagena protocol on biosafety. 52 Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001

on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC

53 B 2001/18 54 C 2001/18

, 3/2014

99

. - .

1829/2003.55 - .56 - . - .57 . , - 0,9% . 1829/2003 , , - .58

, - , 1946/2003.59 , - . , , - , .

, ( 834/200760) ,

55 Regulation (EC) 1829/2003 on genetically modified food and feed 56 .: , ,

, - : ? (. , ), - 2008, 76-79.

57 , , , 47-48/2014, 281-282.

58 , et.al., , - , 2012. 64-65.

59 Regulation (EC) 1946/2003 on transboundary movements of genetically modified orga-nisms.

60 Regulation (EC) 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Regulation (EEC) 2092/91

; , ... (. 81105)

100

. , - , .61 , 2010. - - .62 - , - -. , - , - .

,63 , -. . - - , , - . , , . . -, - , , . , - - , .

61 . 62 Commission Recommendation on guidelines for the development of national co-existence

measures to avoid the unintended presence of GMOs in conventional and organic crops. 2003/556/EC

63 , , , , , , , .

, 3/2014

101

, , -. , , - COEX-NET.64 - (European Coexistence Bureau) - . - , , . .

9. 65

, , . -, .

, , - .66 , -, . 67 . - , ,68 - .69 ,

64 2005/463 (Commission deci-sion establishing a network group for the exchange and coordination of information concerning coexistence of genetically modified, conventional and organic crops)

65 ( . 41/2009)

66 . 2 . 67 ( . 30/2010.) 68 , ,

, , .

69 , , : , , (. , ), , 2012. 48

; , ... (. 81105)

102

- . - .70.

, - ( : ). , - - . - . 110 - . - .

, - - . , - , , . , . , , - . , ( - , ).

, -, . - 71 . , - 72 ,

70 2014. 1600 . 45 31 . , . ( : Naslo-vi.Net, , http://www.naslovi.net/2014-08-25/danas/ samo-organska-hrana-bez-primesa-gmo/11400375 06. 2014.).

71 ( . 62/2014) 72 ( . 41/2009)

, 3/2014

103

.73 , . - . , .

10. -

- , - , . , - , -, . . - . , , . . lex specialis derogat legi generali, -. - . - , .

73 . 61, . 1 3 .

; , ... (. 81105)

104

Duan Nikoli, Ph.D., Full Professor University of Novi Sad Faculty of Law Novi Sad Tamara Gajinov, Ph.D. Student University of Novi Sad Faculty of Law Novi Sad

Conventional Agricultural Land Use and Immissions of Genetically Modified Organisms

Abstract: Ownership rights do not provide the owner with full freedom of

use over the owned thing anymore, especially when it comes to such valuable resources as agricultural land. Ownership rigths are privilegia odiosa these days. Highest legal acts of several countries, as well as decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union, stress the fact that it is not absolute and that it has a particular social function. The owner is obliged to use the land, and to do so in a conventional manner. Conventional should, with respect to logical reasoning, relate only to what has been accepted, by a broader community, as useful and reasonable. However, that is not always the case in modern world. Agriculture is considered conventional when it is directed towards intensive plant production, while making use of artificial fertilizers, growth hormones, pesticides, fungicides, insecticides, and other chemical products. In USA and some other countries, production of plants which have a DNA modified by use of techniques of genetic engineering (GMO), are treated under the same legal regime. On the other hand, traditional, organic agriculture is treated as an ex-ception, and special, more restrictive rules are applied to it.

Civilization obviously found itself in an absurd situation. Something for which it is undoubtedly clear that it is bad in many aspects, and long term unsu-stainable (conventional agriculture) is considered normal, something for which it is not known whether and to which extent it is harmful (GMO agriculture) is being tolerated, and something for which we confidently know that it is not har-mful, or at least not as nearly as harmful as the previously mentioned is consi-dered an exception (organic agriculture).

The difference between GMO immissions and emissions from a certain property being allowed or prohibited, i.e. whether the owner of a particular property will be held responsible for disturbance and possible damage, as a re-sult of contamination of the environment, is determined by the way the GM

, 3/2014

105

plant production is being treated (as conventional or not). Therefore, the first part of this paper is dedicated to determining what is considered conventional use, in comparative law. The second part is is dedicated to immissions of gene-tically modified organisms.

In certain countries, special rules on coexistence of different types of agri-cultural production have been created, in order to prevent immissions, or bring them to a minimum.

In Serbia, production of GM plants is prohibited. However, contamination of environment can come as a result of act with disrespect to the prohibition, by an owner or user of agricultural land. That opens an array of questions, to which traditional institutes of civil law are not capable of giving complete and precise answers.

Key words: land use, GMO, immissions, contamination, liability.

; , ... (. 81105)

106

, 3/2014

107

341.9:347.635 doi:10.5937/zrpfns48-7264

,

:

1

: II bis o , - . 11 . 8 . - , - - . - . , , .

: , II bis, - , , .

1.

-

- 2, -

1 ( )

2 . , () 340, 10.11.1997 ( ), IV: , ,

, ... (. 107128)

108

, 3. - . , - - 19684 5, - 6. - , , , -, - . 65 . 1 . () ( ) - .

3 . , 83, 30.3.2010. ( ) V: , , 3 . 81 . 1: , (. 81, 2, .()); . , , , 3/2012, 141.

4 . - 27. 1968, . 1 . 220; http://curia.europa.eu/common/recdoc/convention/en/c-textes/brux-idx.htm, 13. 2014.

5 1999 , http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/tam_en.htm, 13. 2014; - 2001 , - - , ; 12, 2001.

6 ; . Rafael Arenas Garca, Abolition of Exequatur: Problems and Solutions, Mutual Recognition, Mutual Trust and Recognition of Foreign Judgments: Too Many Words in the Sea, Yearbook of Private International Law, 12, 2010 351.

, 3/2014

109

. - - . , , - , , - , - .

, , - . - (Oberhammer)7 -: () , - . - / -, . 8 , 9, ,

7 . Paul Oberhammer The Abolition of Exequatur, IPRax 3/2010, 197. 8 . R. Arenas Garca, op.cit., 351. 9 -

. 44/2001 22. 2000 . ( 21, 2001) 2010.. , . Proposal for a Regulation of the Eu-ropean Parliament and of the Council on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Recast), COM (2010) 748 final; , . Laurens Je Timmer, Abolition of Exequatur under the Brussels I Regulation: Ill Conceived and Premature?, Journal of Private International Law 1/2013 129; ngeles Rodrg-uez Vzquez, Review of the Brussels I Regulation: Complete Abolition of Exequatur?, Justy-na Balcarczyk, Development of the Exequatur in the Civil Procedural Law of the European Uni-on in the Area of Commercial Law Its Current Abolishment, Latest Developments in EU Pri-vate International Law (eds. Beatriz Campuzano Daz, Marcin Czepelak, Andrs Rodrguez Ben-ot, ngeles Rodrguez Vzquez) 2011, http://centro.us.es/cde/justicia_civil_2011/mod_009.ht-ml#ed 13. 2014; Xandra E. Kramer, Abolition of Exequatur under the Brussels I Regulation: Effecting and Protecting Rights in the European Judicial Area, Nederlands Internat-ionaal Privaatrecht, 4/2011 633; Peter F. Schlosser, The Abolition of Exequatur Proceedings Including Public Policy Review? IPRax, 2/2010 101; Paul Beaumont, Emma Johnston, Aboliti-on of Exequatur in Brussels I: Is a Public Policy Defence Necessary for the Protection of Human Rights?, IPRax, 2/2010 105; Gilles Cuniberti, Abolition de l'exequatur et prsomption de prote-ction des droits fondamentaux, Revue critique de droit international priv, 2/2014 303.

, ... (. 107128)

110

.10 , 11 - () , - 12.

- 13 , . - 2201/2003 ( : II bis )14, 805/2004 -15, 1896/2006 16, 861/2007 17, 4/2009 , , -18 1215/2012 - ()19.

10 . P. Oberhammer, op.cit., 198. 11 Ibid., 200. 12 Ibid., 202-204. 13 . . 2, 5. 14 . Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdict-

ion and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, 338, 23.12.2003.

15 . Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims, 143, 30.4.2004.

16 . Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure, 399, 30.12.2006.

17 . Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 establishing a European Small Claims Procedure, 199, 31.7.2007.

18 . Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008 on jurisdiction, appli-cable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to main-tenance obligations, 7, 10.1.2009.

19 . Regulation (EC) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, 351, 20.12.2012.

, 3/2014

111

- .

II bis ( : ) - , 20. , -. - . - . - II bis, - .

2.

II bis

() . 2201/2003 - -21 : - . 11 . 8.22 : () . 10 , , () - - . 13 -

20 . Monique Hazelhorst, The ECtHRs decision in Povse: guidance for the future of the abolition of exequatur for civil judgments in the European Union, Nederlands Inernationaal Privatrecht 1/2014, 27.

21 . . 14. 22 . . 40 .

, ... (. 107128)

112

1980.23 , , - , - III 4. , .24

: - - - 25, , . - . , : (i) - ( - ), (ii) (iii) - . 13 1980.26

II bis . 40 42-47. (1. 2005) - , - . 42. (Rinau)27. -

23 . , . , 7/91; . 13 : , , : ()....., () . .....

24 . 11 8 : . 13 , , , 4 III, .

25 . . 42 . 1 . 26 .

2201/2003 ( II bis), 1/2012, 139; ., , Brussel IIbis Regulation (eds. Ulrich Magnus, Peter Mankowski), 2012, 343-402.

27 C-195/08 PPU, Inga Rinau, 11. 2008.

, 3/2014

113

;28 - , , - . 11 . 8, . 40 42 - , - ;29 - ;30 - , , - , .31 - (Zarraga Pelz)32 II bis - - , ; , . 42 .33

3.

3.1. -

34 II bis - ( : - ) .

28 Ibid., . 52. 29 Ibid., . 63-64. 30 Ibid., . 85. 31 Ibid., . 89. 32 C-491/10 PPU, Joseba Andoni Aguirre Zarraga v Simone Pelz,

22. 2010. 33 Ibid., . 75. 34 . C-211/10 PPU, Doris Povse v. Mauro Alpago ( :

), 1. 2010.

, ... (. 107128)

114

3.1.1. A

2006. -. . 2008; . . . ; . , , - . .

16. 2008 () 12 ( : ). . 13 . () 3. 2008, 1. 2008, . . 11 . 5 II bis. 21. 2008. , 23. 2008. 23. 2008, , - 1980 , . - , ; - .35 6. 2008 . - - . . . - 2008 2009, .

21. 2008, , 7. 2009.

35 Ibid., . 22-26 .

, 3/2014

115

. 13 a. () - . - - . 26. 2009 . 15 . 5 II bis36, . .

. , 9. 2009, - , , . 11 . 8 II bis. (19. 2009) - . - 10. 2009 , - , . - . 42 II bis37,38 .

36 . 15 II bis , . 5 : , , , .1 . () (). , . -, . 4 18.

37 . 42 , : (1) - . 40 . 1 . (), . 2 , - .

. 11 . 8, , .

(2) . 40 . 1 . () . 1 :

() , - ;

() ; () , ,

. 13 1980. -

, . -

IV ( ).

, ... (. 107128)

116

- , 25. 2009. . -, , . 23. 2009 - .39

. 22. 2009 - 10. 2009 - . - . . , 40, -. -.41 - II bis -. 10. 2010..

- ( 2008) - (16. 2008) , . 11 . 3 , , .

3.1.2. 42.

, . 11 . 8 43,44

. 38 . , . 27-31. 39 Ibid., . 32. 40 . . 27. 41 . , . 33-34. 42 Ibid., . 34. 43 . 11 . 8 :

13 1980, , - 4 III, .

, 3/2014

117

( ) - , . 47 . 2 45,46 - , - , 47.

, : (1) II bis o - , - ;48 (2) ; 49,50; (3) - II bis , , , - (. , ), , (. )51. - 52;

44 . 2, , 34. 45 . 47 : (1) -

. (2) , -

2 . 41 . 1 . 42 . 1 .

. 41 . 1 . 42 . 1 .

46 . 4, , . 34. 47 . 5, , . 34. 48 . , . 57-63, 73. 49 . . 6, Xandra Kramer, Cross-Border Enforcement and the Brussels I-Bis

Regulation: Towards a New Balance Between Mutual Trust and National Control Over Funda-mental Rights, Netherlands International Law Review, 3/2013 343.

50 . , . 57-63. 51 Ibid., . 73. 52 Ibid., . 72.

, ... (. 107128)

118

; - . 42 . 2 ; - , - 53, , . , - -, , - . .54 , .55

: - - , ; , - , .56

3.2.

- 8 57.

53 Ibid., . 74-75. 54 Ibid., . 83. 55 Ibid., . 81. 56 Ibid., . 76, 78-79. 57 . , -

.9/2003; . 8 : 1. , . 2. , , , .

, 3/2014

119

3.2.1.

13. 2010 - .