이머징 마켓 진출 전략에 관한 연구 - 시스템다이내믹스에 의한 접근
DESCRIPTION
이머징 마켓 진출 전략에 관한 방대한 선행 연구를 토대로 시스템 다이내믹스의 인과지도 제시. 2000년~2012년 SSCI Top 저널의 핵심 연구 소개. 정창권 박사 학위 논문 (2013년 서울과학종합대학원)TRANSCRIPT
- 20132
-
2012 11 2013 02 () () () () ()
1. , (2012) : , , 13(3), 67-98. 2. , (2012) , , 15(3), 225-250. 3. , (2012) , , 20, 7-32.* .
. 1. . . 2. () () . 3. (DRM) . . : - : : 0902001014 : 010-7403-1577 : () : 2013 02
(Emerging Market) . 500 480 . . . . , , . . , . 2000 2012 SSCI Top . 5 (Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, Harvard Business Review, Journal of International Business Studies, Strategic Management Journal), 55 . . (Institutional Theory), (Transactional Cost Theory),
(Resource-based View). , , , . (competency gap) . . . . . (System Dynamics) (CLD, Causal Loop Diagram) . . 8 . . . . Wayism
. (Wayism) . , CSR/CSV . . . . . . , . (delay effect) . . : , , , , , ,
. 1 . 7
1. 1 2. 2 3. 4 1. 7 2. 8 2.1. 8 2.2. 10 2.3. 11 3. 12 1. 13 1.1. 13 1.2. 14 2. 18 2.1. 18 2.2. 21 1. 24 2. 26 2.1. 26 (1) 26i
. 13
. 24
. - 57
(2) 32 (3) 35 2.2. 38 (1) Wayism 38 (2) 46 2.3. 50 3. : 55 1. 57 2. 60 2.1. 60 2.2. 62 2.3. 65 (1) 65 (2) (Tata Motors) 67 2.4. 70 (1) 70 (2) 75 2.5. 80 (1) 80 (2) 81 (3) 83 (4) 84
ii
. 96
2.6. 86 (1) 86 (2) 88 3. 91 4. 93 1. 96 1.1. 96 1.2. 98 2. 99
100
iii
2 4 7 Keyword 12 19 23 () 25 28 40 52 58 58 64 () 72 74 78 , () 88 , , 90 95
iv
6 15 17 20 31 34 36 Wayism 39 48 51 56 61 61 2010, 2011 87 89 92
v
. 1. (Kumar, 2011; Johnes, 2012). 2002 2009 9 (Tse, 2010) , (emerging market) . , 2011 2020 2% 7% (Ichii, 2012), 2030 GNP GNP 50% (Tse, 2010). . . 500 480 (Tse, 2010). (Wright, Filatotchev, Hoskisson, & Peng, 2005). 52% , GDP 60% . 15 15 6 (Economist, 2012). .
(Kumar, 2011; Jones, 2012). . (homogeneous) . (heterogeneity) (Wright et al., 2005) (Wright et al., 2005) .
2. ? ? ?
(heterogeneity) (Wright et al., 2005) (Wright et al., 2005).
, . , .2
, (2012a; 2012c) .
. , , , , , , , CSR(Corporate Social Responsibility, ), . .
, . . .
3
3.
1 2 3 4 5 6
. . . . . .
6 . 1 , . 2 . . , , . , . 3 . . , . 4 . . 4 1 . 4 2 3 . 3 , ,
4
, , . 3 , , , Wayism , , 6 . 5 . () 100% . 5 , , , . . 6 . , ..
5
1
2
3
,
4
5 6
6
. 1.
. , (institutional theory), (resource-based view), (transactional cost theory). Hoskisson et al.(2000) 2000 2012 . (Gao et al., 2010) (Peng, 2003), (social network theory)(Khanna and Rivin, 2001) , .
Hoskisson et al.(2000)
d Rf Peng et al.(2005), Khanna et al.(2005), Meyer et al.(2009), Feinberg & Gupta(2009), Henisz & Zelner(2010), Mair et al.(2012), Simanis(2012) Hoskisson et al.(2000), Peng & Luo(2000), Dharwadlkar & Branders(2000), Park & Luo(2001), Gong (2001), Douma et al.(2005), McCarthy & Puffer(2008), Bhaumik et al.(2010), Li & Atuahene-Gima(2002), Spencer(2008), Kale et al.(2009), Malik & Kotabe(2009), Kumar(2009), Black & Morrison(2010), Zhang et al.(2010), Chang et al.(2012),Tomson(2012)
Li & A
(2000 2012) tuahene Gima(2001), ahmoo & u in(2005),
-
M
~
7
2.
2.1. (IT, Institutional Theory) ,
. (rules of the game) (Hoskisson et al., 2000:252). , . (network-based growth strategy) (Peng & Heath, 1996). (Khanna & Rivkin, 2001; Li & Atuahene-Gima, 2002), (Peredo & Chrisman, 2006) (Peng, Lee, Wang, 2005; Peter, Uhlenbruck, & Eden, 2005; Mahmood & Rufin, 2005; Bhaumik et al., 2010). (institution) (macro) (micro) . Mair, Mart, & Ventresca(2012) . , . (marketization), (privatization), (heavily regulated) (Shenkar & von Glinow, 1994) (Hoskisson et al., 2000) . (Peter et al., 2005; Puffer &8
McCarthy, 2011), (Li, & Atuahene-Gima, 2001; Lu & Ma, 2008; Gao et al., 2010; Tse, 2010) . (Institutional Void) (Henisz & Zelner, 2010). . Khanna Palepu 15 (Khanna & Palepu, 1997;1999; Khanna, Palepu & Sinha, 2005). , , (Khanna & Palepu, 1997; Miller et al., 2009). (Simanis, 2012) (problem-sensing tools) (Mair et al., 2012). , (Lu & Ma, 2008), (Li & Atuahene-Gima, 2001). . . (Hoskisson et al., 2000).
9
2.2.
(TCT, Transactional Cost Theory)
(Hoskisson et al., 2000). (Hoskisson, Hill, & Kim, 1993) , (Kogut, 1988) . . (Peng & Health, 1996). , . (Banga, 2007). (agency theory) (nexus of contracts) Hoskisson, et at.(2000) . (asymmetric information) (monitoring cost) . , (Kogut, 1998; Hoskisson et al., 2000). . (Wright et al., 2005).
10
2.3.
RBV . RBV (context) (Hoskisson et al., 2000) (Leonard-Barton, 1992). (Black & Morrison, 2010; Ichii, Hattori, & Michael, 2012). RBV (Conner & Prahalad, 1996). (spillover effect) (Mahmood & Rufin, 2005; Peredo & Chrisman, 2006; Banga, 2007; Zhang, Li, Li, & Zhou, 2010) RBV , , , , (Peng, 2001). (liability of foreignness) (Barney, Wright, & Ketchen, 2001; Meyer, 2001; Peng, 2001; Miller & Eden, 2006; Lu & Ma, 2008) (Chang, Gong, & Peng, 2012). Peng(2001) (SOEs, state-owned enterprises) RBV
11
3.
. , , , . . . . . . Keyword
w d , , , , , , Key or
keyword .
12
. 1. 1.1.
S 1961 MIT Jay Forrester [ (Industrial Dynamics)] . . ( ystem Dynamics)
, . . (Forrester, 1961: ; , , , 1999 ) ( , 1999; Forrester, 1993; Richardson, 1991; Richmond, 1993; Senge & Sterman, 1992). . . . . . .
13
. .1.2.
() (dynamic feedback perspective) (framework)( , , , 1999; , 2007; , , 2009) . , , . (time-based) (feedback) , (holistic) (, 2008). . , () , ( , 2009). . , . , , (, 2008). . 14
. , , , , . - , , , , - (, 2007; Meadows, 1980:31-36)
(
, 1999:51, )
, (feedback) (closed loop thinking, circular feedback system) (circular
15
w -way causation or feedback) ( , 1999:36; , 2007). . . . . . , (endogenous point of view) , (, 2007; Richardson, 1982:1-2; Meadows, 1980:30-31) , (holistic) (operational thinking) . . ( , 1999:38; , 2007) . . .causation, t o
, . . . .
16
. . . (High Performance, 1994:30-31). . , . .
, 1999:51, )
(
17
2. 2.1. (
CLD, Causal Loop Diagram)
2> .