2011( 2) ( 1)

205

( )

/ / . .. / / . ..

/ / .

,

, ,

, , ,

,

.

Factors Forwarding Performance Level For theUniversity Instructor

( An Applied Statistical Study For Sample of Iraqi

University Instructors )

Abstract:

This study deals with the topic of performance for the university

instructors and fortification him from corruption status, which may results

from exceptional circumstances to pass onto the country and how virtuous

of performance affect by many such factors. Where virtuous instructor

contribute to setup virtuous university which adopt educative and

administrative system to fortification it's students and stuffs against any

type or forms of corruption , this idea came from it's responsibility feeling

2011( 2) ( 1)

206

in creating capable virtuous governmental stuff .In this study the above

idea was applied to a sample of instructors taken from Baghdad, Kirkuk

and Al-Torath natives university college, for this purposes the

questionnaire designed containing some factors by following up may keep

instructor's virtuous. The most important results of the study is that in spite

of exceptional circumstance, Iraqi instructors still keeping their

performance , and this may be forwarding through out following up

concerning officials and applying special criteria concerning with scientific

performance and encouraging field of activity in addition to providing

some standard living requirements that may keeping sociality status for the

Iraqi university instructors.

:

. (. 2)

(. 5)

,

.

(. 4)

.

2011( 2) ( 1)

207

.

, 50 150 , ,

.

MINITAB . . Excel

. . : ":

, , ,

, . ,

, . (5) :,

, ,

. , , ,

, .

, .

,.

2011( 2) ( 1)

208

, ,

, , .

, ,

. . ,

, .

. ,

(. 6)

, ,

,

, . ,

, ,

, . ,

2011( 2) ( 1)

209

: ":

.

, ,

50 150 .

, 50 , 50

.

.

chi-square Minitab Excel

(1 .)

. ( 1)

. . Chi-square

( 1) " .

.% 50

2011( 2) ( 1)

210

15,360 Chi-square %. 5 12

( 1) ,

.

(:1)

- 5 10 6 2 18 5 10 9 24 15 4 11 30 72 6-10 2 5 9 16 7 1 3 11 4 0 2 6 33

11-15 5 2 3 10 3 0 1 4 2 1 0 3 17 16-20 3 1 0 4 6 0 2 8 1 0 0 1 13 21-25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 26-30 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 3 1 1 5 9 31 -0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 3 4

150 50 15 7 28 50 15 11 24 50 14 14 22 % 30% 14% 56 % 30% 22% 48 % 28% 28% 44)%(

Chi-sq.= 15.360 d.f.=12

2011( 2) ( 1)

211

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

-5 6--10 11--15 16--20 21--25 26--30 31--

)1(:

( 2)

% 78

. Chi-square % 5

. 12 12,792 ( 2)

, .

2011( 2) ( 1)

212

( 2)

. .. . . .. . . .. .

%

1 5 4 1 1 11 2 0 1 0 3 10 4 2 0 16 30 20 %2 13 7 3 2 25 10 2 2 0 14 9 6 1 2 18 57 38 %3 3 3 2 1 9 9 1 3 0 13 7 0 1 0 8 30 20 %4 2 2 1 0 5 7 6 2 0 15 3 1 2 0 6 26 17.3 %

% 4.7 7 2 0 0 0 2 5 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 150 50 2 6 11 31 50 0 11 9 30 50 4 7 16 23

Chi-sq.= 12,792 d.f.=12

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

)2(:

( 3)

% 37

2011( 2) ( 1)

213

, % 20% 21 Chi-square , "

% 5 . 4 2,818

( 3)( 4) ,

.

(:3) )%(

1 3 8 11 1 2 3 1 15 16 30 20 %2 9 16 25 4 10 14 3 13 16 55 37 %3 1 8 9 6 7 13 2 8 10 32 21 %4 0 5 5 5 10 15 3 3 6 26 17 %5 -0 0 0 3 2 5 0 2 2 7 5 %

150 50 41 9 50 31 19 50 37 13

%26 %74 % 38 %62 % 18 %82 %

Chi-sq.= 2,818 d.f.=4

2011( 2) ( 1)

214

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

)3(:

( 4)

1 0 0 1

4 0 3 1 10 3 4 3 8 2 2 4 5 1 2 2 11 3 6 2 3 0 3 0 42 9 20 13

( 5)

% 78

2011( 2) ( 1)

215

% 11,3 % 22 % 10,7

,

. Chi-square 5 % 2,030

( 4) .1.

( 5)

%

% 78 117 41 14 27 38 13 25 38 17 21

3 0 3 7 3 10 3 0 3 16 10.7 %

7 2 9 2 0 2 3 3 6 17 11.3 %

150 50 17 33 50 16 34 50 19 31 Chi-sq.= 2,030 d.f.=1

2011( 2) ( 1)

216

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

)4(:

( 6) % 35 % 65

% 35

Chi-square . % 5

. 1 3,424

2011( 2) ( 1)

217

( 6)

%

% 64 32 14 13 1 18 8 10 % 36 18 12 11 1 6 5 1 50 26 24 2 24 13 11

% 66 33 20 17 3 13 6 7 % 34 17 12 10 2 5 2 3 50 32 27 5 18 8 10

% 68 34 21 16 5 13 3 10 % 32 16 10 9 1 6 3 3 50 31 25 6 19 6 13

150 89 76 13 61 27 34 )%(

Chi-sq.= 3,424 d.f.=1

( 7) % 77

% 80 % 23 % 5 % 15

Chi-square . . % 5

( 5) .2 6,574

. ,

2011( 2) ( 1)

218

.

( 7)

)%(

% 77 116 1 31 2 34 5 30 2 37 3 35 7 45

5 2

3 0 13 3 10 0 16 4 10 2 34 23 %

150 3 41 6 50 5 40 5 50 3 38 9 50 % 6% 82% 12 % 10% 80% 10 % 6% 76% 18 )%(

Chi-sq.= 6,574 d.f.=2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

)5(:

2011( 2) ( 1)

219

, ( 8) % 85

% 86 ,

15 .

Chi-square % 5

0,103 1,852 ( 7) ( 6) . 1 6

. : -

, ....

% 97 - % 3 ,

,

.

- ,

.

2011( 2) ( 1)

220

, - % 90

...

Data show % 10 .

,

. -

,

.

2011( 2) ( 1)

221

( 8)

- 5 14 4 18 0 0 0 18 36 %6-10 7 1 8 8 0 8 16 32 %11-15 4 0 4 5 0 5 9 18 %16-20 2 0 2 2 0 2 4 8 %21-25 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 4 %26-30 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 %

31 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % 50 17 0 17 33 5 28

- 5 18 4 22 2 0 2 24 48 %6-10 5 4 9 2 0 2 11 22 %11-15 1 1 2 0 2 2 4 8 %16-20 0 1 1 6 1 7 8 16 %21-25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %26-30 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 4 %

31 -0 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 % 50 16 3 13 34 10 24

- 5 26 1 27 1 1 2 29 58 %6-10 1 0 1 6 0 6 7 14 %11-15 1 0 1 3 0 3 4 8 %16-20 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 %21-25 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 4 %26-30 4 0 4 0 1 1 5 10 %

31 -0 0 0 1 1 2 2 4 % 50 17 4 13 33 1 32

150 50 7 43 100 16 84 % 4% 29 % 11% 56 )%(

2011( 2) ( 1)

222

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

-5 5--10 11--15 16--20 21--25 26--30 31-

)6(:

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

)7(:

2011( 2) ( 1)

223

. ":

.

.

: -1 % 50 .1

% 35 .

. % 78 . 2

% 22 .

% 73 . 3

. % 22 . 4

. % 77 . 5

% 20 % 80 % 23 % 20% 23

. . 6

% 85 ,

2011( 2) ( 1)

224

. .

. 7. . 8

.

. 9

. .

-2:

. .

. .

. , , . 6

.

2011( 2) ( 1)

225

" " ,(2007) . , -1 ., ,

", (2010), ., -2. 25, , ,"

" . " , (2010), , -3 , , " " ,(2009),, -4

. . 21," .. : " , (2009), ., -5 ( " 2008), , -6

. 5, 2333 , "