, 2014

(NED) . , .

, , , , .

2013 25.6%- .[footnoteRef:1] , 2012 12% , 185 115- .[footnoteRef:2] [1: . : www.ipu.org] [2: . : http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm]

, 19 3 .[footnoteRef:3] [3: 2014 ]

2014 . 12 ; 69 2 ( . ). , , , , .

I - 1.1 71 . -10 -12 151- , 2014 31 515 [footnoteRef:4] , , , . 1550 2083 . [4: https://matsne.gov.ge/index.php?option=com_ldmssearch&view=docView&id=2310718&lang=ge]

2010 , 11,1% [footnoteRef:5]; [5: http://www.isfed.ge/main/653/geo/]

2014 11,6% . : 2010 : 1550 , 171 ; 2014 : 2083 , 242 . (20% ) : (47%); (24%); (22%); (21%); (21%); . (20%); (20%); (20%); (20%); (20%); (20%); (20%).

: . (7); (7); . (11); (7); (6); . (3); (6); . (3); (7); (6); . (3); . (5).

, , 5%- , :

, , , , , . , 2010 . , . ( - 71 000; - 60 000; 41 000) :

, , 2010 2014 :

, 4 , : , , - . 3 ( - , ) , 2014 , . 3 (- , -) .

1.2. . - , , , , , , . 7,66% (248/19), 12.6%-.

, 2010 . 2010 7.5% , 2014 7.66%- . 2010 11.5% , 2014 - 12.5%-.

1.3. , [footnoteRef:6] . , . 10%-, 12%. [6: - , 25 (, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , )]

1.4. , , . , 38%- , 24%- - , 11%- , - 13%. : 3 . 1384 , 149 , 287 38 . - 139 , 33 .

, , .

II -

. , . 30- 71 , [] 30%- , ( ) 30%-. , .

, , (CEDAW)[footnoteRef:7], , (ICCPR).[footnoteRef:8] [7: 1994 : http://goo.gl/wdILXY] [8: 1994 : http://goo.gl/ZCkjSa]

2014 18 , , . [footnoteRef:9] , , . [9: Ciommitee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, 18 July 2014, point 16. ]

, , , , . .[footnoteRef:10] [10: Ciommitee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, 18 July 2014, point 24 and 25. ]

,[footnoteRef:11] - . , .[footnoteRef:12] [11: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/platform/declar.htm, 1995 . ] [12: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/platform/]

, 2003 [footnoteRef:13], , 40% , . [13: Recommendation Rec (2003)3 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on balanced participation of women and men in political and public decision making, https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=2229]

, , , , .

III

[footnoteRef:14] , , , , . [14: ]

, :[footnoteRef:15] [15: , , , .. , , . ]

1. , / . , .

2. , / , . , . , , , , ( , , ).

40%- .. , , , .[footnoteRef:16] [16: 1995 ]

IV -

, .

, , .

, : (district magnitude); , ; - ; .

, , : , , , , . , - .

, .. (party magnitude). , , , . , , . , , .

, , , . , , . , ( , , ), , , , , , .

, , . - , , , . , , , , , , .

, , . , .. , , . .

, , , , .[footnoteRef:17] [17: The Impact of Electoral Reform on Womens Representation, Pippa Norris, 2006. ]

, 2004 12,6% , 2008 - 10.6%-, , 2012 - 15%, 2004 3%-, 2008 - 1.3%-, 2012 - 9%-.[footnoteRef:18] [18: , NIMD, 2013 ]

, , ( , ) ( 40%) , , , .

V -

5.1 -

- , . , , - .

2003 .. , 30% . , , , .[footnoteRef:19] 2007 , , , 30% . , , , . [19: 52- ]

, 2003 23% , 2003 30%-, 48%- . , 38% , - 64%.

5.2 - , , .

45% (2010)

42.5% (2011)

, , 30%- , , , .

38% (2010)

36% (2011)

32.2% (2011)

, 150 . , , 2 .[footnoteRef:20] , .[footnoteRef:21] - . , , 50%- , , .[footnoteRef:22] .[footnoteRef:23] [20: 117bis ] [21: 1195 ] [22: 23(9) ] [23: 26(2) ]

, , , [footnoteRef:24] , 40%- . , , . , , , . [24: 44 bis (1), 44 bis (2) ]

, 35%- , 2014 40%- . , . , . , , :

1995: 12%1999*: 23.3%2003: 35.3%2007: 36.7%2010: 38%+26%

1996: 21.6%2000: 28.3%2004: 36%2008*: 36.3%2011: 36%+14.4%

1996: 7.8%2000:13.3%2004:12.2% 2008*: 13.3%2011: 32.2%+24.4%

* .

VI - , , . , : .

6.1. , , , , . . , , , 50%- . , , . , ( 50%- ). , , , .

6.2 , . , . , , , . .

VII - , , , , , , . , , , , . , , , . , : 1. , , ;

2. 40%- , , 40% . 40%- 60%- ;

3. : , (50%-50% ). 30% . - , , ;

4. , , , , , .

5. : , , , . , , .

:[footnoteRef:25] [25: , ]

1. TheConvention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women(CEDAW) of 1979;2. TheInternational Covenant on Civil and Political Rights(ICCPR) of 1966;3. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, concluding observations on the combined fourths and fifth periodic reports of Georgia, 18 July 2014;4. Gender Quotas and Female Leadership: A Review, Rohini Pande and Deanna Ford, April 7, 2011;5. Thematic Paper on MDG 3, Promote Gender equality and Promote Women, MDG task Force, 2010-2015;6. Designing for Equality, best-fit, medium-fit and non-favourable combinations of electoral systems and gender quotas, Stina Laresrud and Rita Taphorn, IDEA, 2007;7. Democracy and Gender Equality: the Role of the UN, IDEA, UN, UNDP, UN Women, Discussion Paper, 2013,8. Electoral Gender Quota Systems and their Implementation in Europe, European Parliament, 20139. Electoral Quotas for Women, IDEA, 2013.18