Книга о полезной и красивой архитектуре
TRANSCRIPT
-
. : , , . , , . , . , , , , , , - , , , , .
, , - , - . , . . , - , .
. , , , .
, , - . , , , , .
: , . , -, . , .
,
-
24
34
38 CABE
64
90
96
116
138
156
180
23
7
72
74
79
84
71
89
242
246 -
260
260 1. ,
282 2. ,
300
364
241
355
310
318
332
338
348 .
196
220
227
-
85.118 7253
-
53 . / . . .: , 2016. 368 .
ISBN 78-5-906264-60-2 72 85.118
600
, 2016 .
strelka-kb.com
mosurbanforum.ru
l-invest.ru
. - , , -
-
- - () . -: -2014 , .
[ ] ? . : 1. . - . - , , , , - , , .
- - - .
, , . - . , . .
-, . - -
. - .
, , . - , , , .
, . . , - .
1 . -, , // www.strelka.com
-
, , -
,
, , Buromoscow , , UNK project , , -, Malishev Engineers () , , ACMGA () , The Geller Group, () , , , - - () , - l'AUC () , , RDI Group , , () , RIBA (-) , - , Citymakers , - , , , , - ()
, () , , () , , () , , , Baukultur () , , EBRA () , () , . , Sergey Skuratov Architects , () , , SPEECH , Wowhaus , , , ()
, , , Stefano Boeri Architetti () , , , International, () , - archspeech.com , - . , , , , () , SPEECH , , LLx Design ()
, , , , UCLA () , , , International , () , . , -- (BCA) , () , (, ) , Brewin Design () , ARCHPLATFORMA , ,
-
7
-, , . . , - . , . .
- , - , - . - . .
, , , - -. - , , .
, , - , , - - , .
- : , ? - ?
-
8
, . ? .
- , . .
-, - . - , - , , . - . , (, - ) .
-, . - ( BREEAM, DGNB, LEED, SGLS .) , . -, , .
- -. : , -, .
. - . - , -, . . .
, , - , , - . , -, - .
, -, . - .
-
9
13 . 12 . (, , , ) - . , , ( ), - .
- .
-, - . - , ( ), - , - , .
-, - .
.
(- , .). - : , - -. , , , - .
-, , , -. , , . - ( , POE), - , .
/
1
2
3
-
10
- .
-, - - , -, . - . , - , - .
-, - - (). , - 87 -, - - . , . - ( ) . , : -, .
-, ( , - , , ). - . - , - . , -, - , .
-, , , , . 305- - . - . .
-, . -, - . .
3D-
=
-
11
. - .
40 -. -: , - , . -. .
- : . -
, - . - ( ) . . - , - (, .) ;
(). . - ,
, - - . - . , , - , , ;
. - , , , - . - -. , -, , , - , .
- , - , . .
()
1
2 3
4 5
7
6
IIII II
-
12
- - ( . .. , , ) ( , , , ). , - .
: , -
;
- , , , - ;
- ;
, , - ;
(, , , , ) ;
- , , .
, , - , - . , - .
-
13
- -, , .
: . , , ( ) , . -, - (, , . .). , c , .
- , , . , , - . - , , , , -
, , , . , - .
, , , (, , - ) - . -. , , - , , , . .
. . , -, .
1) 2) 3) 4)
1) 2) 3) 4)
1) 2) 3) 4)
-
14
- .
- 9 . ( - 5 % 2016 .). (9,2 . ) - (9,8 . ).
- 530 . - - .
( ) 10 . . 1164 . .; 2400 . . . , 36 , - 1 %.
- 8,5 . 2016 ., -- . - , . , : ,
. - - - , .
400 , 6300 , - , .
, , , . , , .
- .
( ) - , 2015 .:1. 0,21 . ;2. Sergey Skuratov Architects 0,14 . ;3. 0,72 . ;4. Wowhaus 0,003 . ;5. SPEECH 1,79 . .
531
.
1 960
2 250
-
9
9,2
9,8
.
-
15
( 2015 . ):1. SPEECH 1,79 . . ;2. 0,72 . ;3. - 0,62 . ;4. 0,57 . ;5.
0,53 . . . -, . - , - .
( 2 % ), .
- 2000- . - , . , , - 20102015 . 45 . -
- .
. - . . - .
. -
. / .
. / .
400400
6 3006 30010102 %2 %24002400 11641164
-
16
- . - , , , .
- , . , -, . , -, .
- , - - , - . , . , , . - - .
. , .
. , , , -.
, - , . - (, , ). - 04.11.1955 - , .
- . - , - . . - , - .
-
17
- 1517 % . - ( , , - ) 80 %.
( ) .
- . , (, , - ) - .
- - ( , , .) .
2015 . :1. 0,23 . ;2. -3 0,22 . ;3. -155 0,18 . ;4. 0,13 . ;5. -4 0,13 . .
50 % -. - . , - . -155 - . .
, ( , - ) -, .
- , ( - - ). , - , , - .
- , - . , .
-
18
-. - -: , . - . - . ?
- , -, , . , -, -.
- : . 2025., : -, - , . - .
, - , , - , . -
-. -, .
- . . - .
, - , , - . - . - , .
, , . ?, ? -. - - , , - .
-
-
-
- -
-
-
19
, - , -, -. , -, , -, .
, . . . - . - .
- - . - , , , . . , -- -.
- . , . - -
- .
, . - . .
-, , . - () .
- (mixed-use), - -. , , , . , , .
-
20
- -, . . - - , , (Concept Design, Schematic Design .).
, , - . - . , .
. -, - . () - , . , ,, - . , -. , . - . -
, -, .
- . - . , . - - , .
-
21
, , - . ( ) , ( ).
- - () -, - .
- . , - (, ) . - - -.
- - -. - , .
,
, .
, ( 2 % - 26 % ). , .
, . - , - . , - ,, .
8 %14 %
37 %
18 %
53 %
40 %
2 %0 %
2 %
26 %
-
22
10 , . -, - . , - .
( , ), , .
- sustainability, , ( ), - . - , , , - , - , .
. -
, . , , , .
. ( ), - . - , - .
- ( , POE). , 20 ( ) - ( ). , . - , .
-
. 23
: . 24 . 34 : CABE . 38 . 64
-
24
. , , , , . , - , .
, - . , , , , . , . , -. , .
1. , - - . , (, ) - , (, , , , - ), , , - (-, ) , .
, , , -
. - -. , . , - - . - , , , - . , , - , , - . , . .
, - - 2. - . - - ( - - 3),
1 , - -. ., .: .. . .: , 1997; .. -: , , // . 18 (3). 1998. . 283308. , - (, , , , ) .
2 . , , . .: , 1984.
3 .: Jenks, h. (2007) Critical Modernism. Where is Post-Modernism Going? London, Wiley.
-
. 25
, - . , , - . - ( -4), . - - . , . - , - .
, - 5. - . 2000- , - .
- , 30 , .
. , , , , - ( ). , , . - , , , . , , -, - , - ( - ).
, - , - . . - .
, , . - , , . - - (, , , ).
, , , . -, - , - , - , . , , .
, - .
, - . -, , , - , ( , , ), -, , , . , - - 6. , - , -. , - , - .
- . : , - . , - - , ( ) - . ,
4 .: . : (19141991). .: , 2004.
5.: . ? // . 3. 1990. .84118.
6., .: .. . .: , 1974.
-
26
, - . - .
, - ? , --, : - XIX . , . , , , , . , , art nouveau, - . , .
, 7, - - 8. - -, , . - - , , . 9, -, . - , , . - .
, , , ( , - ), . , . , , .
, -. - , . , - -, .
-. , , , - , , , 10. . ( ) (, - ), -. , . -, , , . , , : - . , (, ) , , - , - .
, . . , -, , - . , , - . - 11, , - .
-- , , - , , . , , - . , , - 7
.: .. . .:, 1985.
8 .. . .: , 1924.
9.: .. . XIXXX // . . 7. 1982.
10 .. ( ). .: , 1988.
11.: . . .: , 1997; . . .: , 2000.
-
. 27
?
-
28
- . ( 12 13), , , 14 ( -, , ).
, , - , , , . - .
venustas. Venus , , . . , - . - , , - .
- - . : - , , 15.
- , , , , . , , ,
, - (, 16). , , (urbs), (civitas), , .
- . , , - , - . 17, - 18, - 19, 20 -21 .
, , -, : , , - . , , - , , -, 22.
-. ( !) . - , -, .
, -, ,
16 . . 21.
17.: von Simson, O.G. (1988) The Gothic Cathedral: Origins of Gothic Architecture and the Medieval Concept of Order. New York, NY, Princeton Architectural Press.
18. .. . .: - , 19351937. . 12; .. . .: , 2001; . . , - .. .: , 1999.
19. : Middleton, R. (1980) Neoclassical and 19th Century Architecture. New Haven, CT, New Haven & Land; Middleton, R. (1962, 1963) The Abb de Cordemoy and the Graeco-Gothic Ideal: aprelude to romantic classicism, in Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes. Vol. XXV, pp. 278320, and Vol. XXVI, pp. 90123.
20.: . : . . 13 : . .: , 1990. . 172181.
12Yeang, K. (1995) Designing with Nature: The Ecological Basis for Architectural Design. New York, NY, McGrawHill.
13Braungart, M., McDonough, W. (2002) Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. New York, NY, North Point Press.
14 . -, , - , . C - (, , -, ) . - , - , ( ), - -.
15 .: .. - - // . .:, 1976. . 1764.
-
. 29
. , , , , - . , , urbs civitas, . , - , . , -, civitas .
. . - , XIX . -, , .
, , ( 1905) - , - -. (1938) - ( -23) . , -24, , .
, - - , , ( - ). - , , , . - -
( , - ). - .
- .
, , firmitas utilitas venustas. 25. Firmita firmo , , , , - - sustainability, .
Utilitas , - utor, , (oculus utor , ) (male utor ). , , . , - - (nostris utimur annis) utor , -. - utilitas , , , , .
, venustas, , , -. , - , - . , , , , -, -. firmitas utilitas venustas sustainability sociality organicity, - .
21., .: - .. . .: - , 2008.
22 .: .. // .., .., .. . . .: . .. , 1988. . 5782.
23Mumford, L. (1961) The City in History. San Diego, CA, Harcourt Inc.
24 ( . . -. .: , 2001).
25 .: .. . .: , 2003.
-
30
-
-
+
-
Urbs ()
Sustainability
=
Genius loci
Civitas ()
-
-
- -
-
-
..
-
. 31
-
-
+
-
Urbs ()
Sustainability
=
Genius loci
Civitas ()
-
-
- -
-
-
..
-
32
, , , . , , , , . , - , -. .
, , - , .
, , , , , - , .
, , - , - -. - , - . , , , .
. , , - : . - , , -: , , - . , ( - -, - ), ( Swatch, Breguet).
, - . , . - - , location (), -,
, , 26, location, location location. , , -, - ( firmitas utilitas venustas ) . - - , - .
, . , - location. , , - - , .
26. : Safire, W. (2009) Location, Location, Location, in The New York Times Magazine, June 26.
-
. 33
. David Chipperfield Architects, 2009
J
oer
g v
on
Bru
nch
ha
use
n
-
34
, , - . - . - - -, - . -. -. , .
- . 1898 . -, . , .
. - (1998)2, - , -
- (a quality driven agenda), . -, , - 3. , - , - . - , CABE, RIBA4 .
- . - , , . , -, .
5: ( ); ( -
); , .
, - . , XXI . .
. . - , , 1.
1 . ? . .: Strelka Press, 2014. . 164.
2 Egan, J. (1998) Rethinking Construction: Report of the Construction Task Force. London, HMSO (constructingexcellence.org.uk).
3., .: Macmillan, S. (2006) Added value of good design, inBuilding Research & Infromation. No. 34 (3), p. 259.
4 - , (DCMS) - - (ODPM); (RIBA).
5.: Gann, D., Whyte, J. (2003) Design quality, its measurement and management in the built environment, in Building Research &Infromation. No. 31 (5), pp. 314315.
-
35
-, . -, , ( ). , .
. - . - , , - . - . : , , .
, - . - () . . . .
. , - (), ( ). - : , .
, . : - . - .
. .
-. , - , . , - . , - , - (. 49 . 6). - - .
, - . , , . () . , - (.. 108), , . .
- , , . , , - . - BREEAM (.. 60).
-. , - , - .
. , , . - (). - , , (. . 272). : , - . , .
, - . - , (Concept Design). Design Review7. - - ,
( )
6Communities and Local Government (2012) National Planning Policy Framework (www.gov.uk).
7 BREEAM.
-
36
. . (. . 312).
, , . - , , . , , -. - . -. . , .
, - , (Integrated Design Process). -, , (. . 130). . , , .
, , , , , - . - -. -, (, POE). -, BREEAM, LEED . ( - . , 8.)
, . . , . , . (., - -), , , - . - -, .
, - . . -, , (HEFCE), , -
- .
, -. , , .
? . . - , . .
. - Design Review Panel - (. . 42), , . , - , - , . ?
-. , - . . , - , - . . , , , - .
- . , . - 9. - - - .
- - . - - , - ( ), -- ( - ).
8.: . . . . . 24.
9., , . 24 29.06.2015 636 .
-
37
,
, -
, -
, -
( )
/
,
. - . (, ) .
, - . . - . :
-
38
1
, - 2040 - 1. - . - XIX .
, , , , :1. (Visual Quality
Plan) - , - ;
2. (The Beauty of Amster-dam) , ;
3. (Visual Quality Commission) , - -, .
(VISUAL QUALITY PLAN)2
. - 2013 . - . .
, :
( - ) ;
;
- ;
- - ( , , .);
- ( , ) .
.
(THE BEAUTY OF AMSTERDAM)3
230 . , , 2013 . - , . :
; (-
, - );
( , );
, , .
(. . 108). , .
- : . , , : -
, - ;
:
CABE
1 . . 96 . .
2Welstandnote (.)
3De Welstandsnota De Schoonheid van Amsterdam (www.amsterdam.nl).
-
39 : CABE
- ;
; -
; -
.
, - . . 14: . - XIX ., 19201940- ., , 1985 . . -
: , - , , . , .
, - , - : . -
, - . - ;
. , - . ,
(2013)
o
-
-
40
;
. - - ( , ).
, , , . - , - .
: , , . - - . .
(VISUAL QUALITY COMMISSION)4
-
. 1898 . - .
, - . - , - . . , .
, - . , . : - , .
. , , . , . - - .
, , . . , - , - -. .
: -
; ,
;
- , .
4Commissie voor Welstand en Monumenten Amsterdam,(www.welstand.amsterdam.nl). . : . 111 . .
-
41
(. )
. - (orderprand). - . , ,
. , . , -, - . - . , -
/
( , - -), , , ,
. - ,
- - -
(- )
- (- ). -
,
, , , ,
( )
: CABE
-
42
2
(DESIGN REVIEW CABE /
DESIGN COUNCIL)
, , , . 1920- ., - - - (CABE).
CABE , 1999 . - 2011 . - (Design Council), - , -.
, - , CABE - . , - (Design Review)5. 2013 .6
. - . -, (), - 7.
- - (National Planning Policy Framework, NPPF), 2012 . - , .
. . , . , -,
, . - .
- , -. NPPF , - (good design) - 8. - -. .
-. , , - , . - .
: ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; .
.
1. ( ). , - .
, , , -, , , 9.
. - .
5., .: CABE (2006) How to do design review. Creating and running asuccessful panel; CABE (2006) Design review. How CABE evaluates quality in architecture and urban design.
6Design Council (2013) Design Review. Principles and Practice.
7 . 2012. -. , , . . .: Ibid. p. 12.
-
43
2. -, . , - .
. - , . , - .
- . . , , - . - : RIBA, RTPI, .
- - . - , - . , - .
- . (-, ) . - , , .
. - - - . , : -
; -
; -
, ;
- ;
.
-, . -, , , .
3. -. - . , - : , - , , , , , - . - , , . - : - , - , .
, - , . - , - - . , : , , - . , , .
4. - . , - .
, - -. , , -. , - .
, , .
5. , , . , , : ; ; ;
8Department for Communities and Local Government (2012) National Planning Policy Framework. Para 56, p. 14 (www.gov.uk).
9 Design Council (2013) Ibid., p. 14.
: CABE
-
44
; , -
- ;
; ; (
-; ).
6. - . - . . -. . : , -
; , /
; ,
. . , - - .
7. - . .
8. - . . . - , .
. - - .
, - . . , - , - .
9. .
- . - , . , , , - . .
, .
10. - : , , . - .
- : , -
; -
, - ;
;
- ( ), ;
- ,
, , ,
;
: , , .
. - -. .
, - . , . -
-
45
, , - .
, , , -, - . , - - 1530 , -
, , .
CABE , , . :
, -,
, ?
- ?
- ?
? ? ? ?
?
- ?
, , ?
, ?
-? , ?
-
?
? ?
?
?
? , -
?
, ?
-
?
? ?
-? ?
? , ?
- , ? - ? ?
? ?
? , ?
- -, ? ?
? - ?
?
?
?
? ? -
?
? , .
? ,
, -, -?
? -
?
?
? -
: , , , .? , -
- ? , ?
? ?
?
- ?
: , , , ? ?
, ?
: CABE
-
46
CABE Design Council - , -. . , - , - . - . , , .
3
(DESIGN QUALITY INDICATOR, DQI)10
, 2003 . - (. . ) (Construction Industry Council, CIC11) . .
. - CIC, DQI USA, , -
, - CBRE, - . - DQI: - -, , AECOM, Arcadis .
DQI, : , , , .12 , - : , -, , . DQI . : , .
DQI
DQI = F+I+BQX
10. : Gann, D., Salter, A., and Whyte, J. (2003) The DQI as a tool for thinking, in Building Research & Infromation. No. 31 (5).
11 , - -, .
12
www.dqi.org.uk
-
47
DQI . : (function), - (building quality) (impact).
- . . , - , - ().
DQI: ; ,
;
(), - .
DQI . , -, , -, -. - , .
, , . - -. - , .
, , , .
-
-
-
DQI, ,
: CABE
-
48
, . 20 . , - 13.
. . , - . : , - .
-. DQI :
- . : . - . . - .
, , - -. .
() () . - , .
DQI , , . , , - . - - .
,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
-
- -
-
-
49
13 . -. , , . , , , - . , 15 - , , -
DQI . -. . , . DQI , .
.
- . : -
, -, . , , .
- , - . . . , -, - . IV - (2014) // www.mosurbanforum.ru
: CABE
-
50
4
. -
-
. - , , . . 20152016 . - - .
, - , : ; ; .
( ). : , . , , -, - .
, , -, , , - , - . , : -
, ;
, , ;
; ; .
. . . : , -
; ; .
. , . - .
-, -. - , , . .
- : ; -
; .
-. :
, : 4 , 57 , 810 .
, , . - : , .
- . . . , .
- . , 14: , , .
(, , , )
,
-
,
-
51
-, -. , 0,6 0,7. , -. , - .
- . - , . . 0,17 0,2. 0,3 .
, , -, -. - 5 6.
. . - , - , - (, .). - . - - .
80 -. . , . - .
. . , , , , .
. . . . . , , - , , -, . , , .
. - , , .
, .
, , , . . , .
14 . , , . - .
,
,
,
- , -
, -
,
, -
,
: CABE
-
52
-
, -. - .
. , , , .
, - , , - , -.
-
53
5
(POST OCCUPANCY EVALUATION POE)
- , - , -, 15 , . 1960- ., - , DQI (. . 46)16 . ,
- , - : - .
, 17 18. - , .
POE . - :
1
,
2
3
POE
(, - .)
4
POE
-
5
POE
6
7
POE
,
15 - , , - .
16 .: Zimring, C., Reizenstein, J. (1980) Post-Occupancy Evaluation. An Overview, in Environment andBehavior. Vol. 12. No. 4, pp. 429450. : Sanni-Anibi-re, M., Hassanain, M., and Al-Hammad, A. (2016) Post-Occupancy Evaluation of Housing Facilities: Overview and Summary of Methods, in Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. No. 10.
17 , - , .
18.: HEFCE (2006) Guide to Post-Occupancy Evaluation. London. : , .
19., .: Hiromoto, J. (2015) Post-Occupancy Evaluation Survey Report. New York (NY), Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP, p. 14.
: CABE
-
54
1. POE : -, :
; -
; -
- / .
: ; -
/ /;
. , , : ; -
-;
- .
( ) 36 . . - - - . . - .
2. POE : , - .
(HEFCE) . , 19.
-. :
- -, :
:
-
, 20
, -
-
, - - ,
- , ,
, , , , -
, ,
: - , -,
, ,
-, - , , , -, .
-, , - , ,
, , , ,
, , ,
, -
, , -
,
,
, -
20 (. ).
-
55
3. - : ? ? : ,
/ ?
: , - ?
. . ( ) HEFCE :
, - ( ), ( ) ( )
. , .
HEFCE - . :
21
-, - -. -, ,
-
,
RIBA Design Quality Forum, ()
DQI (. . 4649) -
2030 . .
CIC,
(Overall liking score, OLS)22
10 .
ABS Consulting, . . ( )
- (Post-Occupancy Review of Building Engineering, PROBE)
- - -
-
, , -
- - - (CIBSE)
- BUS ( - -- Building Use Studies Ltd)23
-
1015 .
,
Building Use Studies Ltd
-24
-, - -
- -
-
- - - (CIBSE)
( )
POE , ,
, POE
21HEDQF (2000) Post-Occupancy Review of Buildings. London (www.usablebuildings.co.uk).
22ABS Consulting (2009) Overall liking score (OLS). London (www.absconsulting.uk.com).
23www.busmethodology.org; www.usablebuildings.co.uk
24CIBSE (2012) TM22 Energy Assessment and Report Methodology. 2nd Edition. London (www.cibse.org).
: CABE
-
56
. HEFCE .
, , - :
918 - . . , :
. - :
HEFCE - POE. , . - : , , .25 - .
, - - : -
/
- -
( HEFCE), - ( ) :
-
:
- - ( , )
-
- -
:
, - ?
-
(HEFCE) - ,
, , (., )?
: ? ?
? ?
?
?
-
-
25
.: HEFCE (2006) Guide to Post-Occupancy Evaluation. London,
pp. 2526.
-
57
4. POE . - : ; ; -;
; ;
. . :
+
(
)
- (., )
-
,
-
-
- , -
,
,
, -
,
,
-
,
,
-
, .
( , ) -
()
- . , - , - .
, , . - - .
HFCE , , , . , - POE:
: , , -;
: , .
: - - , - ;
: , - ;
: - -, .
: CABE
-
58
5. POE , - , , .
HFCE :
- (). - . , - , - , - Constructing Excellence, , - 26.
, - . POE : -
. - 69 %. , - 69 100 -
, - 2015 ., - ;
-. 40 %;
( /100 . ). 1,97;
(. /100 . ). 56.
, -, . - .
, , . . - . , - 27.
HFCE . -, , - , .
6. HFCE - . : ( );
, - .
:
-
-
-
26 2015 .: UK Industry Performance Report. Based on the UK Construction Industry Key Performance Indicators (www.glenigan.com).
27.: Space Management Group (2006) Space utilisation: practice, performance and guidelines.
-
59
POE - . : ,
, ;
; , -
; ,
, ; -
. , , , , : ; ,
/ - ;
, - , .
, ( , ) .
- , - (. ). - (abstract),
(executive summary). POE. .
. .
,
,
: CABE
-
60
6
- BREEAM
BREEAM (Building Research Establishments Environmental Assessment Method) - . - . 1990 . (BRE) ( ) , , - .
- (BREEAM Assessor). - , (pass) (outstanding). , - . - . , - BREEAM.
28, BREEAM 1 . - 70 29. BREEAM 80 % . - , . BRE Global . BREEAM.
. , - Greendale ( 1Properties) 2013 . 200 . 30.
, - :
BREEAM Infrastructure - ;
BREEAM Communities - ;
BREEAM New Construction ; Home Quality Mark
( ); BREEAM In-Use -
; BREEAM Refurbishment
, .
, (BREEAM New Construction) : , ;
;
; ; .
; ; -
( , - );
; ; ; ( -
); ( ); .
; ; ; ; ; ; -
( ); ; (
). ; -
; (--
); (-
- );
( , ).
; ;
28www.breeam.com
29 , , - . , 60 BREEAM. , - , , , Ducat Place III .
30www.riarealty.ru
-
61
; .
; -
; ; ; ; .
; ;
; (
); ; ( -
). ; , -
;
; ; .
; NOx; ( -
);
; .
-.
: -, -. .
, , . - 31 34, - ( ) 5.
, . , - ( ) . - .
. - 0,19, ( ) 0,01.
:
N/Nmax 100 % , N ( ),Nmax , .
- . ( -) :
- . - BREEAM .
, RIBA ( . 63), - - . -, . ( 1 RIBA). : () ; BREEAM New Construction; BREEAM In-Use; BREEAM Refurbishment.
. BREEAM , , -, 1900 . XX ., -, , 32.
BREEAM
, % %
85 > 1
70 10
55 25
45 50
30 75
< 30 25
31 .
: CABE
-
62
- . , - BREEAM (, , .). - . - . 88 % BREEAM , 96 % 33.
, BREEAM - , , . - 20002009. , 21 %, 18 %34.
- - ( %)
( )
10 20 50 % 0,12 6 %
17 21 80,95 % 0,14 11,33 %
1 1 100 % 0,01 1 %
16 34 47,05 % 0,19 8,94 %
5 11 45,45 % 0,08 3,63 %
5 9 55,56 % 0,06 3,33 %
10 14 71,43 % 0,125 8,92 %
3 13 23,07 % 0,075 1,73 %
5 5 100 % 0,10 10 %
5 7 71,42 % 0,065 4,64 %
4 5 80 % 0,035 2,80 %
2 10 20 % 0,1 2 %
64,32 %
BREEAM
BREEAM
-
63
BREEAM
RIBA
- BIM- , - -
- BREEAM
BREEAM (NC) BREEAM - (BiU)
BREEAM -, -, - (R&FO)
0.-
2.- -
1. - -
--
2.
3. 2 3 - --
(-) -
- (-)
4.- - - ( - -)
-
-o
-
- -
BiU -
R&FO -
R&FO -
3.- -
4. -
5.-
6. -
7.-
/
1.-
32www.breeam.com
33 - (BSRIA) Schneider Electric. .: BSRIA, Schneider Electric (2012) The Value of BREEAM.
34Chegut, A., Eicholtz, P., Kok, N. (2012) Supply, Demand and the Value of Green Buildings. London, Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors.
: CABE
-
64
- , . , .
, , Cushman & Wakefield
. , . - ( -, , ..) . - , , - . , , , - , - .
. , , - , - . , .
-, -. , , , , - - , , .
, , - , .., , . - , .
, , - . , -, , , , .
, , , . , - , .
, - , .
- . - , - , . .
- -, - (, . . 68).
, -,
-
65
(Cushman &Wakefield, CBRE, JLL, Knight Frank), - , 2003 . .
2013 ., - : ( ), -, , , .
- .
, , - . -, , , , , . -, - . - - -.
- . - , - - . -, . - - -, , ..
, . , ( 15 . -) -, , . - , , - 200300 . . . - -
Cushman & Wakefied 2015 . - . -.
, - . - - .
- . - . - . -- - BREEAM, DGNB, LEED. , - 30%. , - , , , - - , .
- . , -, . , -. . , . - .
, , . , , .
- 19902000- ., -. - ( )
-
66
, - , , . , - , , , , . . . -, -, , , - .
- , - . - , : , , , , , .
, - - (ICSC) -
, , - .
- - . - - - ( , , ). , , -, , , ( , - ), -, - , , . , . - , . - .
- - . - , - , - . - , -, , . - , . , , - , , .
- , .. . , . - , - - , .
10 40% .
, .
-
80 000+
40 000 79 999
20 000 39 999
5 000 19 999
-
-
20 000+10 000 19 9995 000 9 999+
-
5 000+
-
- :
-
-
5 000+
1
1ICSC ( ) // www.icsc.org
-
67
, , - . 2000- . . - - ( , ..), - ,
. .
, +, . (, -). , - .
, . , , (Build to suit).
, , -, . - . - Prime - . 1015 . , -, , - Prime.
Trophy , . , , .. . , , - , .
-
68
( , +, -) , + (
). - - ( ). , ,
,
( ), 2013
+ -
1.
1.1.
1.2. ,
, , - , - -
, -, -
, ,
1.3. ,
, 22 C0 1 C0, 60 . 10 .
1.4. , ,
1.5.
- -, - 22 C0 1 C0, - 60 3 10 . -
4
1.6.
30
: 20
1.7.
, ( 1 . 70 V),
1.8.
: - , , ,
, .
2.
2.1. 2,7
-
69
+ -
2.2.
-. . 66
-. . 66
: 4 90%
2.3.
20 . 10 , 12
2.4.
12% .
2.5. : 400 /.
2.6.
, - -
, -
2.7.
2.8.
,
3.
3.1.
, , (, , .)
3.2.
15 , , 515 .
4.
4.1.
- .
-
70
+ -
4.2.
: 1 100 . (1/100)
: 1/80;
: 1/60; : 1/301/40
5.
5.1. ( )1
6.
6.1.
, - 5 ( 5 000 . ), - -
6.2.
.
6.3.
, .
6.4.
- , - . (, , , ) -
(, , , ) -
7.
7.1. (, BREEAM LEED)
1 - (), .
-
71
. 72 . 74 . 79 . 84
-
72
- , - () , - - 1.
- . , - : , (. . 24). , , - .
: , ,
; ,
; ; ; , -
; , , -
;
, / - ;
- ;
: - , .
, - , , - , - .
- .
, - . : -
; -
, -
, , , . - , , - .
1 : BNA (2010) The power of architecture: aDutch approach. Societal innovation, smart economy, better space. Amsterdam (www.bna.nl); Harvey, A., Julian, C. (2015) Community Right to Beauty: Giving communities the power to shape, enhance and create beautiful places, developments and spaces. London, Res-Publica (www.respublica.org.uk); McIntyre, M.H.(2006) A Literature Review of the Social, Economic and Environmental Impact of Design. Edinburgh, Scottish Executive; Northwest Regional Development Agency (2009) The Economic Value of Good Design 2009. Liverpool (www.placematter.co.uk); RIBA (2011) Good design it all adds up. London (www.architecture.com).
-
73
, - ;
, , , ;
, ;
- , - ;
- , ;
, - , , - ;
- , .
, - .
. - , - , - ;
. , ;
, ;
;
- , , - ;
- ;
, : - ;
, - , - -, .
- - , - , : -
; -
, ;
- , - ;
- - .
, - , . , - .
, - - -, , . - - .
: - , -. .
-
74
- - , - .
, MORI CABE 2002 ., (81 %) , , - . , - . - . 85 % , - .
, - - . , , - , 77 % . , - , 70 % . , - , - 52 %. , , , , 72 % .
2010 . Ipsos MORI ( CABE , AHRC). - . (81 %) , - .
1 . MORI/CABE (2002) Public atti-tudes towards architecture and the built environment, in CABE. The value of good design: how buildings and spaces create eco-nomic and social value. (www.webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk).
2, 3 . Ipsos MORI/CABE (2010) People and Place: Public Attitudes to Beauty. London (www.ipsos- mori.com).
?1
,
, ,
,
7 %77 %
17 %70 %
52 %29 %
66 %22 %
9 %72 %
?3
,
5 %
2 %
10 %
19 %
23 %
24 %
39 %
51 %
?2
,
/
-
81 %
62 %
2 %14 %40 % 41 %
4 %34 %28 %16 %4 % 14 %
3 %
1 %
-
75
3 %. , - (62 %) , , . - - 48 % , 45 %, 4 % .
, (51 %) , , (39 %) - , 24 % - , 19 % . - , , , - .
, Ipsos MORI Berkeley Group 2013 .4, - , , . 34 % , . 59 % , - , (64 %), - (55 %).
, 2009 .5, - () -. 6.
CABE
, 2000- . , - - .
7 , - , , - 8. . : -
-, ;
;
, ,
4Ipsos MORI/CABE (2010) People and Place: Public Attitudes toBeauty. London (www.ipsos-mori.com).
5Florida, R., Mellander, Ch., and Stolarick, K. (2009) Beautiful Places: The Role of Perceived Aesthetic Beauty in Community Satisfaction. Toronto, Martin Prosperity Institute, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto (www.citiesbeautiful.org).
6 0,172 0,227. , 0,153.
7Samuel, F. (2014) Accentuate the positive, in RIBA Journal, 07.07.2014 (www.ribaj.com).
8McIntyre, M.H. (2006) Op. cit.
. , . Avanti Architects &Kennedy Fitzgerald Architects, 2010
P
au
l Tie
rne
y
-
76
;
, -;
- .
, CABE9. , - , , , - 14 %. The Kings Fund, 78 % - .
, Mercy Suburban Hospital ( , -, ), , , , 7,9 8,7 , .
Scher & Senior - - . 42,6 % - , ; 23,6 % , .
91 % 100 % . - -10. : - , - ; -, , -- , . - , -. - , 8 - 11 - .
-.
- , - . - , , , , , , . 12- -, .
, - Ipsos MORI ( Urban Age), 2008 . 11. , , ,
9, 10CABE (2002) The value of good design: how buildings and spaces create economic and social value. London (www.webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk).
-. () . Aflalo and Gasperini Architects, 2010
D
an
iel D
ucc
i
Da
nie
l Du
cci
-
77
- (68 %), (54 % 38 % ). - 88,5 % ( 11,4 %).
-, Aflalo and Gasperini Architects, - . 4,2 . . - , - .
, , ( 1992 .), - . 2002 . - , , .
- . 2010 . - , . : - , , , . .
- - . - : , , . -, 12.
, , , . - : -, , - .
, -
31 13.
, - - . 14, , -15, - - .
- , , , , , - .
- -. - 2011 . 9 100 . (22,3). 14,46 %16.
11 43 % . 44 %, 33 %.
12. : Johnson, C. (2016) The Future of Libraries Is Bigger Than Books, in Yes! Magazine. April 16 (www.yesmagazine.org).
13Mainka, A. et al. (2013) Public Libraries in the Knowledge Society: Core Services of Libraries in Informational World Cities, in Libri. No.4 (63), pp. 295319.
14CEU Pimentas, Biselli + Katchborian architects (2010).
15CAD SP, PAX.ARQ + Vazquez Junqueira Arquitetura (2012).
16Governo do Estado de So Paolo (2012) Capital reduz homicdios para 9 a cada 100 mil habitantes (www.ssp.sp.gov.br).
-
78
-. ,
- , , .
- , - - 180 . , 2004 . , - . .
- , Elemental, - .
0,5 . 1960- . 97 . , , , - .
7200 ( , ) + 300 ( ).
, , . , . - . , 20 . -17. , , .
, - ( ) . , -, , , 300 18, - 20 . , - . , - .
- Elemental - 19.
- Elemental - 14 - , 7 2010 .
, 2016 . - 15- , - : -. , . , - 20.
17Cook, J.W., Boyer, B. (2010) Case Study: From Shelter to Equity. Designing Social Housing But Building Wealth. Helsinki Design Lab (www.sitra.fi).
18 : // www.archspeech.com
19Dewane, D. (2010) Building Middle Class DNA (www.urgentevoke.com).
20. : . , // www.bricsmagazine.com
- - . , . Elemental, 2004
C
rist
ob
al P
alm
a
C
rist
ob
al P
alm
a
-
79
. ,
, , - - . , - . 1973 . - .
- -, - . , 7 . - 102.
, - . - 1966 . . 1989 . -,
86 . , , - , XX .
2003 . . , , . -, 1. 2007 . - .
- . 2015 . 8,2 -, - 1,45 , 27,3% , 2005 . 10 , 9,3 . - . 2015 . 96,4 ( 14,6% , 2012 .)2.
, Deloitte Access Economics, - 2013 ., 4,6 . - 775 . 8,5 . 3.
1, 2Sydney Opera House Annual Report 20142015 (www.sydneyop-erahouse.com).
3Deloitte Access Economics (2013) How do you value an icon? The Sydney Opera House: economic, cultural and digital value. Sidney (www.deloitteaccesseconomics.com.au).
G
etty
Ima
ges
. . , 1973
-
80
. ,
, , , - , - . 19601980- ., - , . - - .
-1992, - 500- - , . . - , - - .
1992 . - 13,5 . Arup Bigo -: - ,
-. - ( 10 . . ) Genoa Aquarium, , , . - La Bolla 20,5 , - .
- - 1900- . - - 17 8500 . . Arena del Mare 1400 . -, , , .
- 1994 . Porto Antico di Genova S.p.A. - 19902000- . : , - , , , , , .
, , , , . . 2013 . 1,42 , 670. .
, 2013 . - (, . . . -), , (5,625 ), (2,457 ), - (1,876 ) (1,257 )4.
- - 2001 ., - 2004. 2006 . 16 - . , .
, 1994 2012 .
G
etty
Ima
ge
s
, ,
4Mangano, S. (2014) Tourism and Experience Economy: a field research in Building Resilient Communities and Territories. Region-al Studies Association European Conference 2014. Izmir, Turkey (www.regionalstudies.org).
-
81
- - 104,7 5.
, . , - 6. 70 , 50 7. 900 . - , - 2000 2005 . 40 % ( , - )8.
(, -, , ), - , . - , , - , -.
-, ,
, - - MVRDV, , -.
2014 . , - . , : -. - MVRDV, 100 . . , - 175 , 72 - .
-, .
- -, , , .
. - , , .
BREEAM - , -. 2015 . - NEPROM. - . MIPIM 2015 . - , - .
- - .
D
ari
a S
cag
lio
la /
Sti
jn B
rakk
ee
, co
urt
esy
of
MV
RD
V
-. . MVRDV, 2014
5Briata, P. (2012) Urban Policy in Italy. The Genoa Case (www.labora toriorapu.it).
6.: URBACT Markets. Town Centre Regeneration: Thematic Guidelines (www.urbact.eu).
7Bobbio, R. (2011) Rebirth, Catalist, Identity: The Role of Waterfront Development in City Life. The case of Genoa. Flats Forward Water-front Summit Agenda. Cleveland, 1718 October 2011.
8Bobbio, R. (2005) Re-shaping Spaces For A New Economy. The Case Of Genoa. 41st ISOCARP Congress 2005 (www.isocarp.net).
-
82
. -- - : , . , . , . - -.
2015 . 11,2 . . - Klpierre 80 . 8 .9 , - Rotterdam Partners, - ( ) 3,25, - 1 10.
. , , . 600 - , 55 % - . -, , - 78 % 71 % 11.
, : - , - 12. - -: - 2014 . 1,4 %. , - , Lonely Planet - 13.
--.
( ),
- - 15 .
, - Spirul Research 52 2009 .14, (78 %) , , - . , -
U
rba
n S
pla
sh
Mo
rley
vo
n S
tern
ber
g, c
ou
rtes
y o
f S
hed
KM
-- . , . SnedKM, 2007
9 (8,6 ., 2015) (6,8 .). , , The Art Newspaper Russia, 2014 . 4,95 .
10.: www.en.rotterdampartners.nl
11Potters, M. (2015) Markthal heeft last van Bijenkorf-effect, in AD. September 14 (www.ad.nl).
12. : Miles, P. (2015) Will Rotterdams Markthal be equivalent of Bilbaos Guggenheim? in Financial Times. September 18 (www.ft.com).
13www.lonelyplanet.com
-
83
-. 75 % , . - 89 % . , , - .
-- -- , - 2,6 .
. - - -, . 1990- , , . 2002 . .
- , , Urban Splash - ( 11 34 ). , Urban Splash Shedkm, , .
440 . , , , , , - . . - - . , - .
- , . --. , - .
- Federation of Master Builders - 6,5 , 15.
- -- 8 150. 16. 17.
-- : RIBA 2008 ., Roses Design Awards 2009 CABE Building For Life.
16RIBA (2011) Good design: it all adds up. London (www.architecture.com).
17 , 2002 . 36 036, 2008 . ( ) 80 002. 2016 . 67,463 (www.landregistry.data.gov.uk).
14.: Northwest Regional Development Agency (2009) The Eco-nomic Value of Good Design. Liverpool (www.placesmatter.co.uk).
15Leeming, C. (2009) Facelift factor. Building new eco-housing is only half the solution the UKs old housing stock needs to be modified if we are to hit government emissions targets, in The Guardian. 25 March (www.theguardian.com).
-
84
,
- . - . 2016. 17 (24,3 )1. - . , , 2.
2008 ., 42,4 % 53,2 % .
, , - - . , - .
- - , - . - , 3.
, -, -. 2012 . --2012 51,5 % .
, - . - : - - . , 4. - , - : (TheShard, . , 20125), Leadenhall (. / Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners, 2014), Baltimore Lexicon (. SOM, 2016) .
- , : - (RIBA)6, The Architecture Foundation, -
1 , 2015 . - $ 73,7 , $ 26,6 , $ 11,0 (www.budget.mos.ru).
2.: www.london.gov.uk
3., .: . // . (.) -: . ., 2014. . 110131.
4. : Survey reveals more tall buildings planned for London inNew London Architecture. March 2016 (www.newlondonarchitecture.org).
5 (306 ).
S
hu
tter
sto
ck
-
85
7, New London Architecture - (The Mayors Design Advisory Group MDAG)8.
London Legacy Development Corporation, - 2012 . . , , - -. , -, 600 . - - (. ) -- ArcelorMittal Orbit (. .), 9. - , - , - 10.
- : - , , 22 %. TheMasterCard Global Destinations Cities Index, : 2015 . - 18,82 11.
-. 2015 . - , , . ( 2016 . - .) -.
, - , - - - .
. , , - , - . , - - . - , .
1991 . - -. 12. , - .
6 RIBA (.: www.architecture.com).
7www.londonfestivalofarchitecture.org
8MDAG , , , (.:www.newlondonarchitecture.org).
9www.cladglobal.com
10The London Plan. The Spatial Development Strategy for London (con-solidated with alterations since 2011). March 2015 (www.london.gov.uk).
11www.cnbc.com
B
DP
. , . BDP, 2003
12 2012 . 20132016 . .: Action Agenda for Architecture and Spatial Design 20132016 (www.government.nl).
-
86
- - - . , - , , , - .
, , 3 % 3 % - 13.
, - . - QS World University Rankings, 2015 . .
, - - -, . - , (, - , -, ..) .
, , ( 1806 .) - . , - , .
, , - - 14.
2000- .
2,5 , , . .
. , . , 2005
-. , . , 2008
Jav
ier
Ver
a A
rqs.
13The Ministry of Economic Affairs, The Ministry of Education, Cul-ture and Science Creative Value (2009) Culture and Economy Pol-icy paper. Amsterdam (www.rijksoverheid.nl).
14 187 - , 2015. (.:hdr.undp.org); - 2016 ., Numbeo (.:numbeo.com); 11- 2016 . (Better Life Index), (OECD), (.: www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org).
-
87
-. - , : , -, - , - . , , Metrocable, - , (. .) .
20042007 . - : 15. - - . - , , . 16 , .
. . , - , , , , , -, , - . - - ( ), - ( - ), ( --).
2013 . - - Urban Land Institute - . 2016 . -
.
95 . 2006 . 151 . 2011-17. 2014 . 197 .18 2015 . 21- - .
, - , : - . , , . , , , . , 19. , - , - . , .
-: - , . - - .
15. : Turok, I. (2014) Medellns social urbanism a model for city transformation, in Mail & Guardian. 16 May (www.mg.co.za).
16 5 % , . ., .: Schmidt, A. (2011) Participatory Budgeting Is Music to Medellns Poor, in NPR. April 20 (www.npr.org).
17 . (.). 33 , . .: , 2013.
18 - First American Realty Medellin (www.firstamericanrealtymedellin.com).
19 . - . // www.archi.ru
-
88
. - , .
(Perspective Munich) 1998. , 2015 . . - - - , . - : -, , - 20.
2014 ., 20 . - : 1999 . 61,2 %, 2002 . 64,5 %, 2008 . 66,8 %. 20052013 . .
1993 . - : 21. - - , - , - .
, -- Neue Messe Mnchen, Allianz Arena, - BMW Welt, -, , . . - : , , , .
- . - Mercer ( : 39-, 167-)22.
Lenbachhaus. . Foster & Partners, 2013
N
ige
l Yo
un
g /
Fo
ste
r +
Pa
rtn
ers
20State Capital of Munich Department of Urban Planning and Build-ing Regulation (2015) Guiding Principle and Guidelines of the Per-spective Munich (www.muenchen.de).
21Ude, Ch. (1993) Mnchner Projekte: die Zukunft einer Stadt. Mnchen, Zrich, Piper.
22.: www.imercer.com
-
89
. 90 . 96 .116 . 138
-
90
. , , . - - , 1985 ., : , , , -, , 1. , - - , -, .
, , , 1991 . 1997., , - - , , . 2, 2001 . -, :
, ;
;
- , .
- , . , RDI Group 2014 .3, - . :
; -
;
; -
;
1 Council Directive 85 / 384 / EEC of 10 June 1985 On the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications in architecture, including measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment and freedom to provide services, p. 15.
2Council Resolution 2001 / C73 / 04 of 12 February 2001 On architecture quality in urban and rural environments, in Official Journal of European Communities, 2001.
3 , RDI Group. . -. ., 2014. , , - , -, , - .
XXI . - - . - . - .
-
91
2021
1718
1922
2324
25
26272829
30
15
1610
3165
1
2
34
1314
9
8
7
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24.
9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.
25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31.
c,
c,
c, -
11
12
-
92
, ;
; ; , -
, ; .
, RDI Group, , , - .
, , . - . , - - - .
- , , , , . , . .
, , . , , . -, , - 4.
. , - - . . , - .
, , - . . , 2015 . -25 : Mercer, ; EIU, , ; A.T. Kearney, ; PWC, .
28 , . - , : ; ; -
.
4 . : . ? - . .: Strelka Press, 2014. . 164.
-
93
14 , 10 . , , - : , , -
; , -
, ; , -
; .
- - , . (Mercer, EIU, Monocle);
, , , .
, , .
: -25
21 7 6 8
18 5 6 7
18 7 5 6
17 6 4 7
17 9 5 3
- 16 6 5 5
16 8 4 4
15 7 3 5
- 14 6 4 4
13 6 4 3
13 4 7 2
10 4 4 2
10 4 1 5
10 3 3 4
8 2 4 2
- 8 3 4 1
8 3 4 1
8 2 5 1
7 2 5 0
5 2 0 3
5 1 2 2
- 5 3 1 1
5 0 5 0
4 0 2 2
4 1 1 2
4 3 1 0
3 2 1 0
3 3 0 0
, 10 ,
-
94 94
(. )
(.)
(. / . )
- ( / .)
( / . )
2015 . ( )
-
837 200 603 500 580 200 2 240 600 5 535 000 390 500
219,32 114,97 86,22 105 719,1 87,88
4908 5249 6729,11 21 000 7697 4400
7888,62 1376,96 8515,78 3432,53 8094,98 19 942,91
3844 4794,68 5186,59 7880 9720,39 7269,58
3,13 5,09 4,04 5,87 13,72 3,47 *
: www.amsterdam.nl, www.vancouver.ca, www.statbank.dk, www.budgetprimitif2015.paris.fr, www.singaporebudget.gov.sg, www.stadt-zuerich.ch
: www.amsterdam.nl, www.vancouver.ca, www.statbank.dk, www.budgetprimitif2015.paris.fr, www.singaporebudget.gov.sg, www.stadt-zuerich.ch
: www.huizenzoeker.nl, www.navut.com, www.boliga.dk, www.globalpropertyguide.com, www.stadt-zuerich.ch
: www.cbre.com, www.statistik.zh.ch
-
9595
837 200 603 500 580 200 2 240 600 5 535 000 390 500
219,32 114,97 86,22 105 719,1 87,88
4908 5249 6729,11 21 000 7697 4400
7888,62 1376,96 8515,78 3432,53 8094,98 19 942,91
3844 4794,68 5186,59 7880 9720,39 7269,58
3,13 5,09 4,04 5,87 13,72 3,47 *
* 2013 .
-
96
Iwan Baan
: 1275 .
: 219,32 . : 837 . .
: 522300 . . 45400 . .
. Delugan Meissl Associated Architects, 2012
-
97
- 2 300 . , . . - , - .
, . . 2000- ., -, . , , . , West 8 MVRDV.
- , , .
, , , -: , . . - . , , - .
-
98
2006 . (Wetruimtelijke ordening, WRO) - . : - , , , -1. - .
: , . - . , , .
, - 20162020 .2. , . - - .
2040 .: 3. , 2040 . 150 . 20 % - , , - : ; ; ; ; ; ; .
, : ; ; ; ; ; .
2040 . , , , . , , , . . - 4.
2040 . - . - , .
1Ministry of Infrastructure andthe Environment (1965, revision 2006) WRO Wet op de Ruimtelijke Ordening (www.rijksoverheid.nl).
2Amsterdam Metropolitan Area (2016) Ruimte voor economische vernieuwing: Actie-Agenda 20162020 (www.mraagenda.nl).
3Amsterdam Municipality (2011) Structuurvisie Amsterdam 2040: Econo-misch sterk en duurzaam (www.amsterdam.nl).
4 Amsterdam the Municipal Council of Amsterdam (2015) Municipal sustainability agen-da Sustainable Amsterdam (www.amsterdam.nl).
-
99
2
. 2040 .
0 1 2
-
100
,
-
70 . 5,
-
- , , -
6
-
,
1 - -
-
101
-
,
. , - , -, , - 10. 2030 . 13 19 .
-
2 -
-
102
2040. ,
, -
3 - -, -
-
103
- -, -
400 .
-
-
, , -
,
,
,
:
, -
, ,
, ,
- -
4 , , - -
-
104
(Hoofdgroenstructuur, HGS)7. - . -
- , -
-
. -
, -
,
5
-
105
-
8
6 - - 20 % 2013 .
-
106
2010 2030 . 2040 .
MM
M
M M
M
-
5 - , .
6 : (www.amster-dam.nl/zelfbouw).
7www.amsterdam.nl
8 , - , , -, - (Bouwbesluit, - 2012 .), - - (www.bouwbesluitonline.nl).
20102020 .
20202030 .
2030 .
M
-
107
, , , - , -. , - , 9 . - , - , . , , - - , . - , . .
. (Dienst Ruimtelijke Ordening, DRO), - , - .
. - 50 . - , .
- . , , (Urban Plan). , (Zoning Plan), . - .
. PLABERUM10 ( . Plan- en Besluitvormingsproces Ruimtelijke Maatregelen, - ), - . - - . PLABERUM : 1984 .
, . .
-, .
PLABERUM - , - , . , .
, , - , -, - .
9 (. poldermodel) , - , - -. - (Sanders, E.(2004) Woorden met een verhaal. Amsterdam Rotterdam, pp. 104106). - , , , - . - , , , . - , - .
10www.amsterdam.nl
-
108
(Visual Quality Plan), - . - , - . . 11. 2013 . . -, , .
- , , , . - , , - - , - .
- , .
, , -. , - , , - .
, 6 , - . , . - . . , .
2 6 , , , . - , , - , -. - - .
- , -.
. - , - - , - .
- - - .
- -- -.
- -, -. - - , - .
- . - . , , - .
( PLABERUM)
11Commission of Visual Quality and Heritage / Municipality ofAmster-dam (2013) DeWelstand-snota DeSchoonheid van Amsterdam [The Beauty ofAmsterdam]. Amsterdam (www.amsterdam.nl).
-
109
, . : 10 .
, , - . . -, , , , - . , : , -
; ; ; , -
.; ; , , -
, , - .
. , DBB (Design-Bid-Build),
, . - , . , , - . , , .
, - .
-
-
110
, .
. , , , . , . . , - , . - . , .
- , . IDP (Integrated Design Process) , - . , . , , , . - . - , ,
-
-
-
-
111
,, . - .
- . , , , - - , - DBFM(O): Design Build Finance Maintain Operate ( ).
- , 25 . , , : - , , -.
-- . - , , - , - .
, . - . , . , DBFM(O)-, , . DBFM(O) , - .
. , , , , - . - -. , , , . - . , - .
. - . , - , -. - . , - - - , -, . - XIX, .
, , DNR-STB 200912, - 10 .
12BNA (2009) Standaardtaakbeschrijving DNR-STB 2009 Toelichting entakenoverzich. Amsterdam (www.bna.nl).
-
112
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
, , -
-, -, - - -, -
- - -
-
-
-
/ /
-
-
-, - - - -
- ,
-, - - - , -
- - - - -
-, -
, - - -
, -,
, , , - -
, , , , - -- -,
, ( -), , -, -, , - , -, ,
, , -, , -, , - , -,- .
, , -, , , -- , - ( )
, , ,
, ( ), , -,
, , ( ), - ( -), -, ()
, , ( ), - ( -), -, ()
, :
---
- - -
, :
, - -
-
-
- - -
- -
- - - -
--- -
- -
-,
- -
( )
- -
-,
--
, . . -, , -,
, . . -, - -
- -, - - -
-
-
-
-
- (- )
-
-
-
: -, -, , , -
-
-
-
- -
, - - -
- - , - -, , -
-, -
---
- ( -)
- - ( -)
-
- -
- -
-
- -
1 2 3 4 5
-
113
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
, , -
-, -, - - -, -
- - -
-
-
-
/ /
-
-
-, - - - -
- ,
-, - - - , -
- - - - -
-, -
, - - -
, -,
, , , - -
, , , , - -- -,
, ( -), , -, -, , - , -, ,
, , -, , -, , - , -,- .
, , -, , , -- , - ( )
, , ,
, ( ), , -,
, , ( ), - ( -), -, ()
, , ( ), - ( -), -, ()
, :
---
- - -
, :
, - -
-
-
- - -
- -
- - - -
--- -
- -
-,
- -
( )
- -
-,
--
, . . -, , -,
, . . -, - -
- -, - - -
-
-
-
-
- (- )
-
-
-
: -, -, , , -
-
-
-
- -
, - - -
- - , - -, , -
-, -
---
- ( -)
- - ( -)
-
- -
- -
-
- -
6 7 8 9 10
-
114
, - . . - - , - , , - .
- . -, , , - - , - .
- , - . . - , - .
- - . , -, - .
-
115
(ARCAM). Ren van Zuuk Architekten, 2009 NEMO Renzo Piano Workshop, 1997
Luuk Kramer
-
116
: 1886 .
: 114,97 . : 604 . .
: 491808 . . 1230626 . .
. Herzog & de Meuron Herzog & de Meuron
-
117
- , 21 .
(charter city), - . - , - , . - . - -, - 1.
, Local Government Act , . . -, - 2.
3: - - . , , -, , - .
1www.fin.gc.ca
2 . 2040 // . (.) - -: - . ., 2014. . 5374.
3 - - (2004), Herzog& de Meuron, - BIG.
-
118
- , 2013 . 20404. , 2041 . - 25 % (765 . .), - 35 %, 30 %.
5, - 2013 ., . , - , , .
(Official Community Plan)6, -- . , , . 2020 .7, , 2040 . . - , ., , (Community Plans), .
8. - , , . .
-, 9. , -, :
; -
, -, , ;
, - , , , , ;
.
, . .
4Greater Vancouver RegionalDistrict Board (2013) MetroVancouver 2040. Shapingour future. Vancouver (www.vancouver.ca).
5Vancouver City Council (2013)Regional Context StatementOfficial Development Plan.Vancouver.
6 - - - . - - - , -. - - - (Land Use Plan). - - . 1990- . - (CityPlan), - - . , . - , .
7 : Greenest City 2020. Action Plan (2011), EcoDensity (2008), Transportation 2040 (2012).
8 - . - - - 3-The Economist Intelli-gence Unit Global Liveability Index 2015, 5-Mercer Qual-ity of Living Ranking 2016, 7- Monocles Quality of Live Survey 2015. - -. 2015 . - , - . ., .: www.gfmag.com.
9www.vancouver.ca
-
119
-
-
- ( ) -
: , - -10
-,
, , : -,
,
, ,
1 , , ,
-
120
, - , -
-, -
-
-
- , , -
- (- ),
- , , -,
-
2 - c ,
-
121
2020 .
( )
150 . 2020 .
17 , -
CO2 2020 .
-
(Green Buildings Program)
- - (Passive Design Toolkit)
3 -, , ,
-
122
-
-
,
, , -
-
, , , -
,
, -
-
-: , , -, ,
4 -
5 ,
-
123
- , - . - (), . , , , - 11. .
- 1916 . . , .
1927 . . , 1911 1931 ., 111 246 . .
- . . , , , - , : - 12.
-. 70 % -13. - . . , . - , .
, -, -, -, . , , - - , - .
. , - (Development Cost Charge, DCC), (Community Amenity Contribution, CAC), , - . , . :
, ;
; -
,
10 .
11 - (Zoning and Development By-law).
12Pettit, B.A. (1993) Zoning and the single-family landscape: large new houses and neigh-bourhood change inVancou-ver. PhD Thesis. TheUniversi-ty of British Columbia, p. 60.
13www.oldurbanist.blogspot.ru
-
124
. , 7080 %14.
, , - : - , , , , , - . - . 2014., CAC 111 . - (52 ), (40 )15.
CAC . , , .
. - , , - . - , .
. , -, - , ,
14Vancouver City Council (2011) Community Amenity Contri-butions. Negotiating for a More Livable City. Vancouver.
15City of Vancouver Planningand Development Services(2015) 2014 Annual Report on Community AmenityContributions & DensityBonusing. Vancouver.
-
()
-
125
. - .
- . , - -. , , , 16.
, -, , - , , . - . , , , , .
, . . 2030 . - , , . , - , - - . , , - , , - .
, , , : -
;
; ; - -
. - , 1970- . - 17, - ,
1. -
2.
3.
16 www.thetyee.ca
17Vancouver City Council (1989) View Protection Guidelines. Vancouver.
-
126
.
30
2
4 -
3 12- -
.
1
.
1 3 2 4 3 2 1
6 6 30 32 30 35
14:00
.
- -
:
:
,
-
-
14:00
-
127
. - , 45- , 3040- . -: 18, 19 20.
, , , - . , - .
, - : (Development Permit) (Building permit). , - (Development-building Permit).
- , : ; (,
.); ; .
, . - , , CAC. - , - : , , .
- - -, . (City Council) , : (, , ,
.); -
, .; ( ); .
, - (Planning Department) - (Development Planner).
, . - , - , , , . (Development Permit Board) , - ,
18Vancouver City Council (1996) Balcony Enclosure Guidelines. Vancouver.
19Vancouver City Council (1992) Plaza Design Guidelines. Vancouver.
20Vancouver City Council (1993) Childcare Design Guidelines. Vancouver.
-
128
, (, , .). , - , , - , . .
, . , , - . - . - .
, , . (Planning Department) - (Director of Planning). , , - . : , .
- - . , -, .
- , ,
, , (AIA)
(
)
( )
(
)
(
)
-
129
- . - (Building Review Branch) . .
- . 21, - (RAIC) - (NPP), , , . , . , , - , .
. -, - : ; ; ; ; .
, , . , - . , , : ; .
.
- Design Bid Build (DBB, ), . DBB . - . - , . -, , , ., - , ,
21National Practice Program for the Profession of Architecture in Canada (NPP), the Royal Architectural Institute of Can-ada (RAIC) (1999) The Cana-dian Handbook of Practice for Architects. Ottawa.
-
130
. , .
Integrated Design Process (IDP). , , BC Housing22 -, LEED23, 24.
IDP - C 2000, - 25 1993 . - . , . , , .
, , . , 26. - .
IDP -, , - . - .
,
-
, IDP ()
22www.bchousing.org
23 - - .
24BC Housing (2014) BC Hous-ing Design Guidelines and Construction Standards. Sec-tion 2, p. 2.
25CANMET Energy Technology Centre (CETC).
26Larsson, N. (2004) The Inte-grated Design Process. Inter-national Initiative for aSus-tainable Built Environment (iiSBE), Ottawa.
-
131
- : -. , , () , - .
IDP , - , , . , , , , , .
IDP : ,
, . - , -. - ;
, - ;
, . . - , - . , ;
- . : , - , .
IDP DBB
C
IDP DBB
-
132 36
DBB
IDP
-
,
-
, , ,
-
, -,
, ,
,
-
133
IDP . - - . IDP - , : , - (-), , , . - , . - . - .
- , , -. , , .
- . , , . , .
IDP , - . - . - .
IDP , - .
-
0 3 6 9 12 15 18
-
( )
,
-
, IDP
-
134
IDP
( )
,
- - - - ,
- , - , , -
- - , , - - , -
- -
, - - - -
- - -
- 29
- ,
-
-, , - -
-, -
-
-, - -
: , , , , , -
: , 27, - -,
: , -, , -, , , -
: - -, -, -, -
: , -, , -, , -
: - - -, -, -, - , -, , - .
: , -, , -, , ,
:
: , , , , , -, -
: - , , -
: , -, , -, , , -
: -, -
,
,
- ( - -, , - .)
- -
- ,
, - ,
-
-
-
:
-
, ,
-
-
-
-
: ,
- -, - ,
-
, -
, - - -
: -
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-
- - -
- ( )
-
- 28
-
- -
-
- - -
1 2 3 4
-
135
27 - . - .
28 - .
29Post Occupancy Evaluation . . 53.
( )
,
- - - - ,
- , - , , -
- - , , - - , -
- -
, - - - -
- - -
- 29
- ,
-
-, , - -
-, -
-
-, - -
: , , , , , -
: , 27, - -,
: , -, , -, , , -
: - -, -, -, -
: , -, , -, , -
: - - -, -, -, - , -, , - .
: , -, , -, , ,
:
: , , , , , -, -
: - , , -
: , -, , -, , , -
: -, -
,
,
- ( - -, , - .)
- -
- ,
, - ,
-
-
-
:
-
, ,
-
-
-
-
: ,
- -, - ,
-
, -
, - - -
: -
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-
- - -
- ( )
-
- 28
-
- -
-
- - -
5 6 7
-
136
- , , - , . - .
- - - .
. - , , .
- . - - . - , (Integrated Design Process), .
- . IDP . , - , , .
IDP . - , , , .
-
137
-. LMN, DA Architects & Planners, Musson Cattell Mackey Partnership, 2010
LMN
-
138
: 1167 . : 86,22 .
: 580 . .: 554113 . . 123500 . .
. JJW Arkitekter, 2012 Ake E:son Lindman
-
139
, , 1. - : - - , -, .
- (Fingerplan), - 1947 . 2, .
, - . - - (, - ).
2030 . - - . I .3
1DANSKE ARK (2011) Factsabout Danish Associationof Architectural Firms(www.danskeark.dk).
2.: . - 2013 // . (.) -: . ., 2014. . 80105.
3Realdania, Mondaymornings(2012) Somethings Green inthe State of Denmark. Scenarios for sustainable economy 2050. Copenhagen.
-
140
- (Technical and Environmental Administration) . : ; ; ; ; ; .
, : ; -.
(A Metropolis for People)4 , 2009 . 2015 . . , -, : - , -5.
:
. - , , 80 % ;
20 %; -
20 %.- (Eco-Metropolis)6 , 2007 . - 2015 . - . . , 7.
- . : ;
; ; , -
.
, - - . 2010 . - . (Copenhagen City of Architecture. The Architecture Policy of the City of Copenhagen)8, .
, - - , - . , , - . , 2015 . -
4The Technical and Environ-mental Department, Copen-hagen City Council (2009) AMetropolis for People. Copenhagen.
5Ibid., p. 2.
6The Technical and Environ-mental Department, Copen-hagen City Council (2007) Eco-Metropolis. Our Vision for Copenhagen 2015. Copenhagen.
7Ibid., pp. 23.
8The Technical and Environ-mental Department, Copen-hagen City Council (2010) Copenhagen City of Archi-tecture. The Architecture Policy of the City of Copen-hagen. Copenhagen.
-
141
. . .
- , , - . -, . - , , - . .
, , , . - , , - , .
. , .
, ( ): -, ,
-
142
-
. , , , . -,
, -
, ,
6
-, , , , -,
,
,
, ,
1 :
-
143
,
9,
- . - -, - .
20 %
. ,
-, , .
-,
, , , - . , - , ,
,
2 ,