Био-сенсоры интернета вещей и предвестники...
TRANSCRIPT
GeOIoTWorld2016
Creatingahybridmonitoringnetworkofglobalprocessesofnaturalandman-madedisastersontheplanetEarth,usinggeo-technologiesoftheInternetofthings(GeoIoT).
•Prof.SarianV.K.,ScienceConsultant,Organisation:FederalStateUnitaryEnterpriseRadioResearchandDevelopmentInstitute(FSUENIIR).Russia•Dr.NazarenkoA.P.,DirectorCenter-DeputyDirectorGeneral,Organisation:(FSUENIIR),Russia•Prof.LyubushinA.A.Headoflaboratory,Organisation:InstituteofPhysicsoftheEarthRussianAcademyofSciencesRussia
Брюссель25мая2016г
Content
1. Theneedtofindnewsolutionstoradicallyimprovethepredictivecapacityofexistingprocessesforglobalmonitoringsystems.
2. Theneedformultidisciplinaryresearch.3. Thenewparadigmofpersonalized
managementofdisaster.4. ThepossibilityofusingGeOIoTforthe
monitoringandmanagementofnaturaldisasterswithnature.
2
1.The need to find new solutions...
• Everyyear,emergencysituationsofnaturalcharacter(suchasearthquakesandfloods)aresourcesofexcessivelylargematerialandhumanlossesindifferentpartsoftheEarth.Inthiscasethelossisequallyhighforbothdevelopedanddevelopingcountries.
• Therefore,theinternationalcommunityandindividualcountriespaygreatattentiontothedevelopmentandoperationoftheglobalprocessesofmonitoringsystems.
3
1. The need to find new solutions ...
• However,themeasurestakencannotyetimprovethepredictivecapacityofexistingsystemstotheeconomicvalueandeachtimeanotherdisasterisacatastrophicsurpriseforboththeadministrationandfortheentirepopulationoftheareainwhichemergencyhappened.Itshouldbenotedthatnaturaldisasterisoftenaccompaniedbyaman-madedisaster.Particularlylargelosses-inlargecities.
1. The need to find new solutions ...Itisnecessarytotakeintoaccountanothercauselargelossesforcountries
thatareexposedtoshocksandman-madedisastersofnaturalorigin.ThefactthattheeffortsofStatesinthedevelopmentoftoolsformonitoringandpreventionofemergencysituationsariseareoftenineffectiveascitizenswhofindthemselvesintheemergencyarea,andevenwarningsaboutemergenciesbecomehelpless,immediatelyforgetalltheinstructionsandasaresult,areoftenthevictimsoftheseemergencies.Thisphenomenon,asarule,thefurtheranalysisofdisasterqualifiesasa"humanfactor".Moreover,weemphasizeagain,thisphenomenonisequallycharacteristicofbothdevelopedanddevelopingcountries.SufficeittorecalltherecenttragiceventsinJapan,theUS,China,Russia,SouthKorea,Guatemala,Pakistan,Taiwanandothers.
6
7
1. The need to find new solutions
Consideringrapidurbanization(UNpredictsabout78%of
theworld'spopulation(6.3billionpeople)willliveincitiesby2050)and
thehugecoststhatarespentintheworldonthescienceoftheearth,andonthedevelopmentofsystems(includingICT)monitoringofglobalprocesses,
MOEeffortsHumanitycannolongerputupwiththepoor
resultsobtainedandurgentlyrequiresthesearchfornewsolutions.
8
• Backgroundpossiblesolutions:• Thesearchformethodsofdetectionsignals,
harbingersofglobalprocesses.• Researchtheimpactofglobalprocesseson
livingandinertobjectsofnature.• Developmentofmodelsofaparticular
disasterataparticularfacility.• DevelopmentofICT-GeOIoT.
9
2. The need for interdisciplinary research
2. The need for interdisciplinary research
CombiningtheachievementsofvariousscientificdisciplinesthroughacommonnetworkwiththeuseofinfocommunicationGeoIoTasasignal-harbingersofdisasterindicatorstoradicallyimprovethepredictivepotentialofglobalprocessesofmonitoringsystems.
10
3.TechnologybreakthroughsthatwouldallowtheGeOIoT(1):
• convergenceofcommunicationnetworks,includingsensor
networksintoasingleinfocommunicationmedium(ICS).UbiquitousaccesstomainstreamuserstobroadbandchannelssingleX(intheRussianFederationistheRussianCommunicationsAdministrationprogramforthedeploymentoffiber-opticcommunicationchannelsthroughouttheterritoryofRF-program2020).TransitiontothenewsystemofassigningIPaddresses-IPv6,whichprovidesvirtuallyunlimitedaccessIoTintoasingleIP-basedICS.
11
1. Thedevelopmentandpracticaluseoflargedataprocessing(database).
2. Thedevelopmentandpracticaluseofcloudcomputing(OS).
3. TransitionserviceprovidersforbroadbandTV(LTEstandards,etc.).
4. technologydevelopment,productionanduseofwirelesssensornetworks.
5. Rapidmassintellectualizationofsubscriberdevices.6. DevelopmentGeOsystems.
12
3. Technological breakthroughs that would allow the Geo IoT (2).
13
It is necessary to allocate three temporary stage, around which all the existing systems are built: Monitoring and prediction of the disaster - the time before the disaster. The catastrophe - the catastrophe. Consequence - the time after the accident.
3. A new paradigm of individualized management disaster
14
Beforedisaster
Predictionofemergency
DuringEmergenciesGeneral
warningonemergencies
AfterEmergencyCoordinationRescue
Existing security systems operating before and after the disaster, almost no controlled rescue of people during the
course of emergency, while the greatest loss of population are taking place during the course of an
emergency.
tt0 tk
3. A new paradigm of individualized management disaster
15
•ItisimpossibletopreventeveryCHC-conceptofanon-zerorisk.•Peopledonotrememberordonotknowhowtobesavedataspecifictypeofemergency.•Withoutexternalassistance(management)peopleinemergencysituationsoftenmakebaddecisions.•thesalvationofeveryhumanbeingshouldbemanaged,takingintoaccountitsindividualcharacteristics.
3. A new paradigm of individualized management disaster
16
userGroups Individualcharacteristics
Guestsbuilding Gender,age,healthcategory
Residentsofthebuilding Jobresponsibilities
Personswithdisabilities Specialneeds(hearinglimitations,visionandabilitytomove)
3. A new paradigm of individualized management disaster
17
•Inthefirststage(beforethedevelopmentofthecatastrophicphase)needemergencycenterinvolvementinthemanagementofpersonalsalvationofeachindividualonthesiteshouldbeminimized
•Duetothefactthatincaseofanemergencycenterresourcesmaynotbeavailable,youneedasmuchaspossibletocarryoutactiontosavelocally,takingintoaccountthespecificityofplacesandpeople
3. A new paradigm of individualized management disaster
Gettingemergency-emergency
sensorsdetectingphysical
quantities
Timeofpublicannouncementof
emergency
awarenessofthe
importanceoftime(score)
thedangerofthisperson
Timeofthecatastrophicphase
EndTimecatastrophic
phase
Timeoftheworkofrescuersatthe
site
t
t0 t1 t2 t3=k t4 t5
t
ExistingSystems
SystemsbasedonITt<t0
18
Phases of emerging situation
3. A new paradigm of individualized management disaster
Implementationofanewparadigmofpersonalizedcontrolthebehaviorofpeoplewhofindthemselvesatthefacilityintheemergencyarea,itwaspossiblewhenusing:GeOIoTassensorsobjectenvironment,-IntelligentsubscriberunitstocommunicatewithsensorsGeOIoT,locatedinthisfacility,-DevelopmentOfmodelsofspecificemergencysituationsatthefacility,createddivisionsMOE.
3. A new paradigm of individualized management disaster
Внимание,в13-йквартирена7-мэтажепроизошловозгорание!
Увасесть10минут,чтобыпокинутьпомещение!
― OrganizationofindependentpersonalevacuationpanicPreventionHelpintheorganizationofrescueoperationsSavingupto90%ofthepeoplebeforetheonsetofacatastrophicdisasterphase
DevelopmentResearchInstituteofRadio
Системазащищена10патентами
Goldmedalatthe13thMoscowInternationalSalon"Archimedes2010"Inventions
Goldmedalandaspecialprizeforthebestinventionoftheyearatthe38thInternationalExhibitionofInventionsinGenevain2010
3. A new paradigm of individualized management disaster
― Thebuilding(object)issetself-organizing(touch)theIoTnetworkofsensorstomonitorphysicalparameters(temperature,smoke,etc.)
― IoTcanbeintegratedwithexistingsensors
22
Incontrasttoexistingsecuritysystemsrunningbeforeand/orafteradisaster,theproposed
systemprovidesdynamicpersonalizedmanagementofevacuationofpeopledirectly
duringemergencies.
Beforeemergencycontrolroomsettings
AfterEmergencyCoordinationRescue
DuringEmergenciesDynamicmanagementofevacuation
3. A new paradigm of individualized management disaster
But the system of individualized management of saving people when disaster occurs, powerless, if the time interval between the beginning of emergency and the start of its catastrophic phase approaches zero. And this value is typical for such devastating disasters such as earthquakes, which bring the greatest human and material losses.
4.Possibility to use of IoT for monitoring and control in disasters of natural origin.
Professor Lyubushin A.A.- Head of the Laboratory of the Institute of Physics of the Earth RAS. O. Schmidt in his work suggested that the detection of these signals, the precursors can be reliably carried out (and thus increase the predictive capacity), if we compare the real-time synchronization of sensor readings by different physical nature, located close to the sensors of existing monitoring systems, sensors with readings of these systems. We assumed that for this purpose the best suited IoT.
4.Possibility to use of IoT for monitoring and control in disasters of natural origin.
The basic idea of the use of sensors of other physical nature (IoT) for synchronization is that the signals -predvestniki accidents are a common modulating signal for sensors of different physical nature.
4.Possibility to use of IoT for monitoring and control in disasters of natural origin.
The sensors GeO IoT (as defined) may be used any living (including humans) and objects stagnant nature.In the basic sciences have accumulated a lot of the results of studies of the influence of global processes on living and inert objects that can be used to search for GeO IoT, the most sensitive to certain types of signal-precursors.
4.Possibility to use GeO IoT for the monitoring and management of natural disasters with nature.
Theexistingfacilitymonitoringofnatural
processes
SelectedGeOIoTsensors-otherobjects
SelectedGeOIoT-trees
sensors,etc.
SelectedGeOIoTsensors-animals,etc..
SelectedGeOIoTisamanof
sensors
TransferforecastingresultsdirectlyontheindividualizedsystemManagementDisaster
27
Centre
4.PossibilitytouseGeOIoTforthemonitoringandcontrolofnaturaldisasterswiththecharacterinthewayofintegrationofgeosciencesandtheInternetofthings.
4. Finding suitable GeO IoT as sensor signals, harbingers of global natural disasters
Giventhefactthatamongtheobjectsofnaturethereisanenormousamountofobjectsthatexhibitincreasedsensitivitytocertainchangesintheenvironmentsettings,thereisahighprobabilityoffindingamongthemsuitablenaturalsensors.Thechoiceofsuchsensorscanbecarriedoutonlywiththehelpofscientistswhostudytheimpactofchangesintheparametersoftheexternalenvironmentontheparametersofnaturalobjects.Sincetheearlystagesofaglobaldisasterofnaturalorman-madeoriginmayoccuratthesametimequitealotsignalov-precursorsemergenciesofvaryingintensity,itisthereforeproposedtousethejointGeOIoTsensor(iepanel,consistingofdifferenttypesofnaturalsensorsGeOIoT,someofwhichunderrealcircumstancesmayhavemoresensitivedatasignals-predvestnikamthantheother)tocomplementthesensors,theexistingmonitoringsystemsfortheglobalprocessesofnaturalandtechnogenicorigin.
28
Itissupposedtocreatetwoexperimentalplotsofthenetwork:KamchatkaandinArmenia.InstituteofApplied
Physics,NationalAcademyofSciencesofArmeniahasappliedforthejobinSkolkovo.ItisexpectedthatthisworkwillcarryyoungstaffIPPF,VernadskyInstitute,NIIR,IPERAS,IEERAS
4.Possibility to use GeO IoT for the monitoring and management of natural disasters with nature
ThankyouforattentionSpeakerSarianViliam,Professor,HonoredWorkerof
CommunicationsofRussia.StatePrizeofRussiawinner,has2prizesoftheRussianGovernmentinscienceandtechnology,professorattheMoscowInstituteofPhysicsandTechnology(StateUniversity)andtheMoscowTechnicalUniversityof
CommunicationsandInformatics.
30