© art & build architect / montois partners / credits: s. brison horizon 2020 the european...
TRANSCRIPT
© Art & Build Architect / Montois Partners / credits: S. Brison
HORIZON 2020
The European Research Council
The European Research Council and Slovak participation
Pavel ExnerERC Vicepresident
Support for the individual scientist – no networks! Global peer-review No predetermined topics Support in all fields of science and the humanities
The ERC supports excellence in frontier research through a bottom-up, individual-based, pan-European competition
│ 3
What is ERC?
Le
gis
lati
on
Str
ate
gy
Scientific governance: independent Scientific Council with 22 members including the ERC President; full authority over funding strategy
Support by the ERC Executive Agency (autonomous) Quality as the only criterion
The European Commission• Provides financing• Guarantees autonomy of the ERC• Assures ERC’s integrity and accountability• Adopts annual work programmes
The ERC Executive Agency (ERCEA)• Executes annual work programme• Implements calls for proposals • Organises peer review evaluation• Establishes and manages grant agreements with Host Institution• Administers scientific and financial aspects • Carries out communications activities
The ERC Scientific Council• 22 members who are active researchers in their communities• Appointed by the Commission • Establishes overall scientific strategy• Controls quality of operations and management• Ensures communication with the scientific community
What is ERC?
ERC in the H2020 structure
The HORIZON 2020 main components: Excellent Science
World class science is foundation of technologies, jobs, well-being Europe needs to develop, attract, retain research talent Researchers need access to the best infrastructures
Industrial leadership Societal challenges
Excellent Science: European Research Council Future and Emerging Technologies Marie Sklodoswka Curie Actions Research Infrastructures
│ 6
Starting Grants
starters (2-7 years after PhD)
up to € 2.0 Mio for 5 years
Advanced Grants track-record of
significant researchachievements in the
last 10 yearsup to € 3.5 Mio
for 5 years
Proof-of-Concept bridging gap between research - earliest
stage of marketable innovation up to €150,000 for ERC grant holders
ERC Grant Schemes
Consolidator Grants
consolidators (7-12 years after PhD)
up to € 2.75 Mio for 5 years
ERC offers independence, recognition & visibility• to work on a research topic of own choice, with a team of own choice
• to gain true financial autonomy for 5 years
• to negotiate with the host institution the best conditions of work
• to attract top team members (EU and non-EU) and collaborators
• to move with the grant to any place in Europe if necessary (portability of grants)
• to attract additional funding and gain recognition; ERC is a quality label
│ 8
Creative freedom of the individual grantee
Evaluation of excellence at two levels:
• Excellence of the Research Project Ground breaking nature Potential impact Scientific Approach Added-value of the Group (only SyG)
• Excellence of the Principal Investigator Intellectual capacity Creativity Commitment
Referees and panels evaluate and score each criterion, which results
in a ranking of the proposals.
Excellence is the sole evaluation criterion
25 Panels for All Areas of Science
Physical MathematicsSciences Fundamental Constituents of Matter& Condensed Matter PhysicsEngineering Physical and Analytical Chemical Sciences
Synthetic Chemistry and Materials10 panels Computer Science and Informatics
Systems and Communication Engineering Products and Processes Engineering Universe Sciences Earth System Science
Life Molecular and Structural Biology and BiochemistrySciences Genetics, Genomics, Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
Cellular and Developmental Biology9 panels Physiology, Pathophysiology and Endocrinology
Neurosciences and Neural DisordersImmunity and InfectionDiagnostic Tools, Therapies and Public HealthEvolutionary, Population and Environmental BiologyApplied Life Sciences and Non-Medical Biotechnology
Social Sciences & Humanities
6 panels
Markets, Individuals and InstitutionsThe Social World, Diversity, Institutions
and ValuesEnvironment, Space and PopulationThe Human Mind and Its ComplexityCultures and Cultural ProductionThe Study of the Human Past
│ 11* Number of instances that experts of a certain country of origin are contributing to the ERC peer review
ERC Panel Members by Country of HI and GenderERC calls 2007 - 2013
Averaged over the first 13 ERC calls 26% of the ERC panel members were women
After 7 Years of Existence…A Success Story
Highly recognised by the research community Over 4 300 top researchers funded (60% are at an early-career stage);
63 nationalities represented Highly competitive (average success rate 12%) Working in almost 600 different institutions in 30 countries 50% of grantees in 50 institutions : “Excellence attracts excellence” Benchmarking effect: impact on national programmes and agencies;
national funding for best "runners-up" Efficient and fast grant management
│ 14
ERC Delivers
30 000 publications acknowledging ERC support by September 2014
7% of these publications were in the top 1% most cited in their scientific field and year of publication
20% of completed LS and PE projects reported at least one patent (on average 2 patents reported per project)
│ 15
May-Britt Moser
ERC Grantee
AdG 2010
The Nobel Prize in Physiology/Medicine 2014 was awarded to May-Britt Moser and Edvard Moser, together with John O'Keefe, "for their discoveries of cells that constitute a positioning system in the brain”.The research leading to these discoveries* was supported by FP5. "Spatial Representation in the Entorhinal Cortex”
Edvard Moser
ERC Grantee
AdG 2013
ERC Grantee
AdG 2008
2014 Distinctions to ERC Grantees
The Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences 2014 was awarded to Jean Tirole "for his analysis of market power and regulation".
Jean Tirole
ERC Grantee
AdG 2009
Two of the Fields Medals 2014 awarded to researchers based in Europe: Artur Avila "for his work in dynamical systems” and to Martin Hairer “for his work on stochastic singularities”.
Artur Avila
ERC Grantee
StG 2010
Martin Hairer
ERC Grantee
CoG 2014
│ 17
Developing a New Generation of Excellent Scientists Analysis of 995 ERC projects
2/3 of staff are people in the training phase of their career
ERC Grantees with a non-ERA Nationality*ERC calls 2007-2013
*) nationality as last declared by the principal investigator Data as of 21/08/2014
TOTAL number of grantees with non-ERA nationality :209 StG/CoG and 102 AdG
│ 19
Attracting Excellent ResearchersComposition of ERC teams (PIs not included)Analysis of 995 Starting and Advanced Grants
EU: 67% Assoc. Countries: 12%
non-ERA: 18% unknown: 3%
53% of non-ERA team members ''attracted'' to Europe with the ERC grant (10% of all team members)
Most non-ERA from China, US, India,
and Russia
│ 21
Evaluated Proposals from Host institutions in Slovakia
Ineligible and withdrawn proposals not taken into account
30%
50%
20%LS
PE
SH
│ 23
ERC Grant in Slovakia
* current host institution; data as of 21/08/2014
The project focuses on glycans, sugar molecules produced by the cell that are rich in information related to its physiology.
Some pathogens - for example bacteria or viruses - produce glycans that mimic those of the host cell in order to avoid detection. Due to the complex nature of glycans, their global study (glycomics) has been slower to develop than the genomics and proteomics fields.
Dr. Tkáč aims to develop nanotechnology to measure glycans in natural conditions, via biochips. This technology will be used to search for novel glycan biomarkers of diseases and to develop new, potent and nature-based vaccines and drugs.
Dr Ján TKÁČERC Starting Grant 2012 - M€ 1.2
Institute of Chemistry - Slovak Academy of Sciences
Electrochemical LEctin and glycan biochips integrated with NAnostructures
│ 24
Mobility of ResearchersERC Starting and Consolidator Grant calls 2007-2013ERC Advanced Grant calls 2008-2013
Current host institutions; data as of 21/08/2014
45 Slovak researchers applied with a HI abroad (in 13 different countries)
1 Slovak researcher holds an ERC grant abroad in Austria
Success Rates per Country of Host InstitutionERC calls 2007-2013
*) First legal signatories of the first grant agreement taken into account
│ 27
ERC Grant Distribution to Countries of HIERC calls 2007-2013
*) Host institution refers to the organisation with which the first grant agreement was signed
│ 30
ERC Grants Based in EU13 Countries
88% of grantees in EU13 countries are nationals of the host country(70% for EU15)
85% of grantees in EU13 countries were resident in the host country at the time of application(90% for EU15)
│ 31
Success Rates by Area of HI
Share of EU13 public researchers in EU&AC = 16%
Share of EU13 research investment (GERD) in EU&AC = 3%
│ 32
Evaluation Outcome
Success rate step1 EU13: 7%Success rate step1 EU15: 22%
Success rate step2 EU13: 43%Success rate step2 EU15: 47%
│ 34
Participation of EU13 Nationals in ERC Calls
Current host institutions; data as of 21/08/2014
55% of EU13 nationals are based with the grant abroad
│ 36
Composition of ERC Teams
Over 6600 team members in the sample
EU nationals: 67% Assoc. Countries: 12%
non-ERA: 18% unknown: 3%
9% of the team members from EU countries are EU13
nationals
28% of EU13 staff = PhD Students
40% of EU13 staff = post-docs
ERC Scientific Council Working Groups & Standing Committees
Internationalisation
Open Access
Widening Participation
Innovation and relations with
industry
Key Performance Indicators
CoIME (Conflict of Interest &
Research integrity)
Committee on Panels
Gender balance
│ 39
• Formulate guidelines on conflict of interest, fraud and ethical matters related to any facet of the ERC's competences, clarifying criteria and considering any particular instance or situation where ethical concerns may arise
important consultative role in cases of scientific misconduct within ERC
promote culture of research integrity
ERC Strategy on Scientific Misconduct (October 2012)
ERC Scientific Council Standing Committee on Conflict of interest & Research integrity (CoIME)
Prof. Jean-Pierre Bourguignon (Chair)Prof. Pavel Exner (Chair - delegated)Prof. Carl-Henrik HeldinProf. Nicholas CannyProf. Isabelle VernosProf. Nuria Sebastiàn Gallés Prof. Sierd Cloetingh
│ 40
5 October 2012: The ERC Scientific Council adopts a Scientific Misconduct Strategy
Host Institutions have primary responsibility for detection of scientific misconduct, investigation and adjudication
ERC Recommendation: all ERC HIs will have structures in place to uphold scientific integrity, deal with all cases coming to ERC attention, report to the ERC on actions taken
│ 41
Notwithstanding the above…..
ERC will address all issues of alleged scientific misconduct concerning an ERC applicant or project
Through its Executive Agency (ERCEA), the ERC will take appropriate follow–up actions, whenever there is sufficient evidence that scientific misconduct has taken place
Role of CoIME in relation to scientific misconduct
│ 42
COIME has an important advisory/ consultative role; works in close collaboration with ERCEA Director; can consult external experts
ERCEA Director takes decisions after having received COIME’s opinion, using his own discretion or judgment
A strict policy on Conflict of InterestCode of Conduct of ERC peer reviewers
• Strict obligations of impartiality • A conflict of interest (CoI) can result in:
the exclusion from the evaluation of the entire call (“out of the call” rule);
or in the exclusion from the panel discussion on the proposal in question ( “out of the room” rule)
• Strict obligations of confidentiality
│ 43
Examples of measures and actions by ERCEA Director
│ 44
Proposals may be excluded from
evaluation, selection and award procedures Request for measures to be
taken by the Host Institution
Suspension or
termination of
granting
Peer reviewers may be excluded
from review evaluation or their
appointment may be terminated
│ 46
Publication date of first calls planned for Autumn 2014.
Three ERC frontier research grants will be available under Work Programme 2015: Starting; Consolidator; and Advanced Grants.
The Scientific Council will analyse the pilot phase of the ERC Synergy Grant (calls were made under Work Programmes 2012 and 2013) before deciding on future calls. No Synergy call under Work Programme 2015.
Restrictions on applications will apply to the 2015 calls based on the outcome of the evaluation of the 2014 calls (same in Work Programme 2014).
Removal of indicative domain budgets. Panel budgets now allocated purely by demand.
ERC Principal Investigators will continue to be able to apply for Proof of Concept Grants (now with three deadlines).
Overhead rate: 25%
ERC Work Programme 2015
│ 47
ERC calls Budget Call Publication Submission Deadline(s)
Starting GrantsERC-2015-StG
410 M€ October2014
February 2015
Consolidator GrantsERC-2015-CoG
605 M€ November2014
March 2015
Advanced GrantsERC-2015-AdG
630 M€ February 2015
June 2015
Proof of ConceptERC-2015-PoC
19 M€ January 2015
DL1: February 2015DL2: May 2015
DL3: October 2015
ERC Calls 2015
More information on erc.europa.eu
To subscribe to ERC newsletter and newsalertserc.europa.eu/keep-updated-erc
Follow us onwww.facebook.com/EuropeanResearchCouncil
twitter.com/ERC_Research
Top European
Institutions Hosting
at least 30ERC
Grantees by Funding
Schemes
StG/CoG 2007-2013AdG 2008-2013
First legal signatories of the grant agreement
Data as of 21/08/2014
Initiated to help ERC grant-holder to bridge the gap between their research and the earliest stage of a marketable innovation
Supporting grant-holders during the pre-demonstration Up to 150.000 Euro per grant One step evaluation
Calls in 2011, 2012 and 2013 (each with 2 deadlines) Fourth call in 2014 (deadlines 1 April and 1 October)
Frontier Research and Innovation: ERC Proof of Concept
2011 2012 2013 2014-1
Submitted 151 143 292 182
Evaluated* 139 120 279 179
Funded 51 60 67 50
* withdrawn and ineligible proposals not taken into account
│ 54
PoC Grants by Country of Host InstitutionERC PoC calls 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014-1: 228 grantsERC Starting, Consolidator and Advanced Grant calls 2007-2013: 4354 grants
Speeding up the Discovery Process: ERC Synergy Grant
2012 and 2013 work programme on a pilot basis 2 – 4 Principal Investigators; complementary skills,
knowledge & resources; to jointly address frontier research problems
Up to €15m for up to six years
Based on ERC principles (no consortia, no networks):• bottom-up and risk-taking• driven by scientific demand• PIs expected to spend significant “core time” together • only one Host Institution, but groups not required to be
physically located in the same place 710 submissions to the first SyG Call; 1.6% success rate 449 submissions to the second SyG Call; 3% success rate