中国原子能科学研究院 c hina i nstitute of a tomic e nergy
DESCRIPTION
中国原子能科学研究院 C hina I nstitute of A tomic E nergy. Fusion-Fissions and Quasi-fissions of 32,34 S- and 48 Ti-induced Fissions at Near-barrier Energies H. Q. Zhang China Institute of Atomic Energy. Outline. Angular distributions of 32 S+ 184 W system - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Fusion-Fissions and Quasi-fissions of 32,34S- and 48Ti-induced Fissions
at Near-barrier Energies
H. Q. ZhangChina Institute of Atomic Energy
中国原子能科学研究院China Institute of Atomic Energy
Outline
1. Angular distributions of 32S+184W system
2. Mass-TKE distributions of 34S+186W System
3. Mass distributions of 48Ti-induced reaction systems
4. Summary
1. Angular distributions of 32S+184W systemExperiment was performed at the China Institute of Atomic Energy (CIAE).
Ebeam = 140, 145, 150, 155, 160, 165, and 170 MeV.
Si-Strip
Si(Au)
Experimental setup
Angular distributions, fitted by
To extract c.s., K0
2, <l2>, and Aexp.
To compare with the calculations of di-nuclear system (DNS) model.
To understand the dynamic processes of capture, fusion, fast-fission, quas-ifission, fusion-fission, and evaporation residue.
2. Mass-TKE distributions of 34S+186W systemExperiment was performed at the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA).
Ebeam = 143, 163, 180 MeV. Forward: Si(Au) – Backward Si-strips
FF = 60.63
BF = -75.39
Angle resolved Mass-TKE
distributions(in 4.2 steps)
More forward, more asymmetric mass distributions
Conclusion:
1) No pronounced quasi-fission components are observed in the
mass distributions, but
2) Pronounced quasi-fission components are observed in the
angular distributions, and
3) Anisotropies can be explained by pre-equilibrium mode.
Relaxation time of K > relaxation time of mass
3. Mass distributions of 48Ti-induced reaction systemsExperiment was performed at the Australian National University (ANU).
Beam: pulsed 48Ti beam (width: 1.5 ns, interval: 106.7 ns),
E = 206 - 296 MeV ( VB).
Target: 144,154Sm, 162Dy, 174Yb, 186W, 192Os, 196Pt, 200Hg, and 208Pb.
Measured by two MWPPACs (CUBE), covered c.m. = 40 – 140 .
50 mass-angle-distribution spectra were measured.
Mass widths depend on excitation energies
compound saddle-point scission-pointSystematic tendency:
Differences in lighter and heavier, as well as in spherical and deformed targets.
Dependence on deformation
Mass distributions are broadened by quasi-fissions induced by the tip collisions at low energies for the deformed targets, while such orientation effects vanish at high energies. And this effects can be estimated by an so-called enhancement factor:
where Eref: Ec.m./VB = 1.15.
4. Summary Angular distributions of fission fragments for the 32S+184W system have
been measured at 7 energies. The quasi-fission components are observed and can be explained by the DNS model.
Mass-TKE distributions of fission fragments for the 34S+186W system have been measured at 3 energies. No pronounced quasi-fission components are observed and in agreement with the scission-point statistical calculations.
K pre-equilibrium fission may occur in the S+W systems, which requires the detail Mass-TKE-Angle correlated measurements (MEADs).
Systematic tendencies of mass distributions have been explored for the 48Ti-induced fissions at near-barrier energies. The observed behavior is a complex function of the fissility, deformation, and reaction energy. The quasi-fission induced by the orientation effects may be reduced for the targets with large deformations.
Thanks to all the collaborators:
C. J. Lin, F. Yang, C. L. Zhang, Z. H. Liu, H. M. Jia, X. X. Xu, L. Yang, P. F. Bao,and L. J. SunChina Institute of Atomic Energy, P. O. Box 275 (10),Beijing 102413, China
R. du Rietz, D. J. Hinde, M. Dasgupta, R. G. Thomas, M. L. Brown, M. Evers,L. R. Gasques, and M. D. RodriguezDepartment of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics and Engineering, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
H. Ikezoe, K. Nishio, S. Mitsuoka, and K. SatouJapan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai, Ibaraki 319-1195, Japan
A. K. NasirovJoint Institute for Nuclear Research, RU-141980, Dubna, Russia
C. Mandaglio, M. Manganaro, and G. Giardina,Dipartimento di Fisica dell’ Universita di Messina, 98166 Messina,and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Ncleare, Sezione di Catania, Italy