making sense of effect size in meta-analysis based for medical research – pubrica
DESCRIPTION
It simply refers to the size and the difference found between the two groups. It's simple to compute, understand, and apply to any educational or social science outcome that can be quantified. Continue Reading: https://bit.ly/3cYJOeG For our services: https://pubrica.com/services/research-services/meta-analysis/ Why Pubrica: When you order our services, We promise you the following – Plagiarism free | always on Time | 24*7 customer support | Written to international Standard | Unlimited Revisions support | Medical writing Expert | Publication Support | Biostatistical experts | High-quality Subject Matter Experts. Contact us: Web: https://pubrica.com/ Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/ Email: [email protected] WhatsApp : +91 9884350006 United Kingdom: +44 1618186353TRANSCRIPT
MAKING SENSE OF EFFECT SIZE IN META-ANALYSIS BASED FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH
An Academic presentation by
Dr. Nancy Agnes, Head, Technical Operations, Pubrica Group:www.pubrica.com
Email: [email protected]
Today's Discussion
Outline
Introduction
Significance of Effect Size Effect Size in Meta-Analysis Formulation for Effect Size
Standardized Means Difference
Cohen's D Effect Size
Fixed Effects Model Random Effects Model Future Scopes
Introduction
Effect size is a statistical idea that helps measure the strength and connection between two variables on a numeric scale.
It simply refers to the size and the difference found between the two groups.
It's simple to compute, understand, and apply to any educational or social science outcome that can be quantified.
Contd...
It's especially useful for calculating the efficiency of a certain intervention concerning other interventions.
It is useful for calculating the efficiency of a certain intervention in relation to other interventions.
It enables us to look further from the simple 'Does it function or not?' question to "How well does it work in a variety of contexts?" and significantly more complex, by focusing on the most crucial feature of an intervention.
Rather than its statistical significance, it promotes a different scientific approach to the accumulation of knowledge.
Contd...
For these reasons, the effect size is considered an effective tool in reporting and interpreting effectiveness.
For example, if we have data on the weight of men and women and notice that, on average, men have more weight than women, women's weight is known as the effect size.
Statistical effect size helps us decide whether the difference is genuine or a difference in factors.
Contd...
Significance of Effect Size
Formulae for evaluating the effect sizes do not often found in many statistics textbooks (other than those devoted to meta-analysis), are not included in various statistics computer packages and are occasionally taught in standard research approaches courses.
For these above-stated reasons, even the researcher who found interest in using measures of effect size is afraid to use them in conventional practice and find it quite hard to know exactly how to do it.
Effect Size in Meta- Analysis
In Meta-analysis, the effect size is concerned about various studies and afterwards joins all the studies into a single analysis.
In statistical analysis, the effect size is typically estimated in three ways:
The standardized mean difference,
Odd ratio,
Correlation coefficient.
Contd...
Formulation for Effect Size
KarlPearsoncreatedPearsonrcorrelation, and it is most broadly utilized in statistics.
This parameter of effect size is signified by r.
The estimation of the effect size of Pearson r connection shifts between -1 to +1.
Contd...
Contd...
r = correlation coefficient
N = number of pairs of scores
∑XY = sum of the products of paired scores
∑x = sum of x scores
Where
∑y = sum of y scores
∑x2= sum of squared x scores
∑y2= sum of squared y scores
Standardized Means Difference
When a research study depends on the population mean and standard deviation, at that point, the accompanying technique is utilized to know the effect size:
Cohen's D Effect Size
Cohen's d is known as the distinction of two population means, and the standard deviation separates it from the data.
Mathematically Cohen's effect size is signified by:
Contd...
Where s can be calculated by using the following formula:
Contd...
Hedges' g method of effect size: This is the modified form of Cohen's d method. We can write Hedges' g method of effect size as follows:
Fixed Effects Model
The fixed-effect model gives a weighted average of a progression of study estimates.
The opposite of the appraisals' difference is usually utilized as study weight.
More extensive studies will offer more than smaller studies to the weighted average.
Contd...
Thus, when concentrates inside a meta-analysis are overwhelmed by an extensive study, the discoveries from smaller studies are practically ignored.
This assumption is ordinarily unrealistic as an examination is frequently inclined to several heterogeneity sources; for example, treatment impacts may contrast as indicated by region, measurements levels, and study conditions.
Random Effects Model
Atypicalmodelusedtosynthesizeheterogeneous study is the irregular impacts model of meta-analysis.
This is the weighted average of the effect sizes of a gathering of studies.
The weight that is applied in this interaction of weighted averaging with an arbitrary impacts meta- investigation is accomplished in two stages:
Contd...
Step 1: Inverse variance weighting.
Step2:Un-weightingofinversevarianceweightingbyREVC(RandomEffects Variance Component).
Future Scopes
Themoresignificantvariabilityineffectsizee(alsocalled heterogeneity) is the more prominent in un-weighting.
This can conclude that the arbitrary impacts meta-analysis result turns out to be just the un-weighted average effect size across the studies.
At the other limit, when all effect sizes are comparable (or inconstancy doesn't surpass testing error), no REVC is applied, and the irregular impacts meta-examination defaults to just a fixed impact meta-investigation (just opposite variance weighting).