저작자표시 공연 및 방송할 수...

127
저작자표시-동일조건변경허락 2.0 대한민국 이용자는 아래의 조건을 따르는 경우에 한하여 자유롭게 l 이 저작물을 복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연 및 방송할 수 있습니다. l 이차적 저작물을 작성할 수 있습니다. l 이 저작물을 영리 목적으로 이용할 수 있습니다. 다음과 같은 조건을 따라야 합니다: l 귀하는, 이 저작물의 재이용이나 배포의 경우, 이 저작물에 적용된 이용허락조건 을 명확하게 나타내어야 합니다. l 저작권자로부터 별도의 허가를 받으면 이러한 조건들은 적용되지 않습니다. 저작권법에 따른 이용자의 권리는 위의 내용에 의하여 영향을 받지 않습니다. 이것은 이용허락규약 ( Legal Code) 을 이해하기 쉽게 요약한 것입니다. Disclaimer 저작자표시. 귀하는 원저작자를 표시하여야 합니다. 동일조건변경허락. 귀하가 이 저작물을 개작, 변형 또는 가공했을 경우 에는, 이 저작물과 동일한 이용허락조건하에서만 배포할 수 있습니다.

Upload: duongthuy

Post on 18-May-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • - 2.0

    l , , , , . l . l .

    :

    l , , .

    l .

    .

    (Legal Code) .

    Disclaimer

    . .

    . , , .

    http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/kr/legalcodehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/kr/

  • - -

    2014 2

  • - i -

    - -

    ()

    2000 ,

    ,

    .

    ,

    , ,

    .

    ,

    , ,

    .

    ,

    . , ,

    , ,

    .

  • - ii -

    .

    ,

    , , .

    ,

    .

    .

    8

    , , ,

    ,

    . ,

    ,

    . ,

    ,

    .

    ,

    ,

    .

    .

    ,

    ,

    .

    ,

    , , ,

  • - iii -

    .

    .

    .

    , ,

    .

    ,

    .

    , , ,

    ,

    ,

    . ,

    , , , .

    ,

    , ,

    , , ,

    .

    , ,

    .

    : , , ,

    : 2011-24012

  • - iv -

    1 1

    1 1

    2 5

    2 13

    1 13

    2 20

    3 27

    3 32

    1 32

    2 33

    3 36

    4

    39

    1 42

    2 54

    3 72

  • - v -

    5

    83

    1 : 84

    2 : 90

    3 98

    6 101

    1 101

    2 105

    3 , 107

    109

    Abstract 115

  • - vi -

    25

    36

    37

    40

    40

    52

    53

    54

    85

    86

    88

    89

  • - 1 -

    1

    1

    21

    .

    . 60

    10%, 65

    7%

    . 2000 11 5 , 60

    1.3 13.2%

    , 65 8,811 6.96%

    ,

    . 2010 6

    , 60 1.78 5

    , 65 8.87% ,

    10 1.91%

    . () 2011 1) , ""

    . 2011 2015 60

    2) 860 1.78 2.21

    , 16%

    1) "" 12 5(2011-2015) .2) 65 , (2012)1 2 60

    . 60

    . 60

    .

  • - 2 -

    . , 2000

    10% 2010

    3.3% 1.0%

    .

    1 .

    ,

    ,

    .

    .

    .3) 1970

    ()

    . 21

    . 2010 () ,

    2010 49.3%

    . 2006 8%

    , 2000 10.4% .

    2000 2010

    42.0% 54.0% .

    .

    , ,

    .

    3) .

    . "()" "(

    )" "" , "" " "

    .

  • - 3 -

    .

    . , , ,

    . " "

    , " "

    .

    .

    .

    ,

    . ,

    ,

    . 2002 2, () ()

    11 .

    () ,

    . ,

    ()4)

    (, 2011).

    2008 , 9 ,

    .

    4) () . ()

    . () .

  • - 4 -

    ,

    (, 2011). 2011 "

    " " ,

    ,

    " .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    "5)"

    .

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    , 2012

    18 6) 2013 12 1 ()7)

    5) "" 11 5(2006-2010) .

    6) 5 . 18 2012118

    .

    7) () ()

    . 5 , 3 . 2013 12 1 35~317

  • - 5 -

    ,

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    2

    1.

    , , . 2010 , 2009

    47,520 .

    . 2008 2010

    , , , .

    .

  • - 6 -

    ,

    .

    ,

    :

    (1) ?

    ?

    (2) ,

    (, , , ) ,

    ?

    (3)

    ? , ,

    ?

    2.

    ,

    .

    (1)

    2012 18 (,

    18) , , ,

    "()" .

    ,

    17 " (),

    (), (), (), (

    )8)"

  • - 7 -

    . 2013

    .

    ,

    .

    21

    . "()"

    ,

    ()9) .

    ()10) ,

    .

    ,

    (, 2008).

    ,

    8) (), (), (), (),

    (): , ,

    , ,

    .

    9) () : 2005 3 (

    ) .

    1980 1990 " ,

    " .

    ,

    , , . 2002

    .

    10) (): ()

    .

    , 1997 15 " "

    . 16 2020

    .

  • - 8 -

    . ,

    ,

    .

    "" ,

    ,

    .

    .

    18 ,

    ,

    . 12 1

    ,

    ,

    .

    " , ,

    ", "" 2015

    100% .

    9073 9064 11) .

    (2009) 9073 9064

    ,

    ,

    90%, 7%, 3%

    90%, 6%, 4% .

    ,

    11) , , 9064 .

    9073 .

  • - 9 -

    .

    ,

    . ""

    .

    (2)

    1970 "()"12)

    "(), (), (), ()"13)

    .

    .

    ,

    , .

    1970 33.59%, 1976 20.01%, 1980 18.21%,

    1995 17.12% , 2010 12.13%

    . ", , " ",

    , " .

    .

    .

    . 21 , , ,

    "()" .

    12) 1970 .

    . , ,

    .

    13) (), (), (), () , ,

    , .

  • - 10 -

    , 15 "()"

    . ,

    .

    (, 2008). , "

    " . 2010 3.2

    , 2.7, 3.6 .

    2000 2006 .

    49.3%(9.7%, 39.6%) , 2006

    8% , 2000 10.4%

    . 2000 2010 10

    42.0% 54.0%

    7.4% 8.6% 34.6%

    45.6% .

    ,

    . "()"14)

    .

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    ,

    14) "" ,

    .

  • - 11 -

    ,

    .

    ,

    .

    , ,

    .

    (3)

    , ,

    .

    , , . ,

    .

    (2008).

    21

    , .

    , . ,

    ,

    .

    .

    . "", "", "

    "

  • - 12 -

    . ,

    .

    ,

    . 18 12 1 ,

    .

    ,

    .

    ,

    .

  • - 13 -

    2

    1

    1.

    . ,

    .15) "()" "()" "

    " , "" " "

    .

    (Family Life Cycle) .

    , , , ,

    . ,

    , , , , , ,

    8 .

    .

    ,

    .

    (1986)

    ,

    . ,

    . (2002)

    .

    ,

    15) . .

  • - 14 -

    .

    (2008)

    .

    . ,

    ,

    , .

    .

    , .

    ,

    .

    ,

    . 60

    .

    ,

    60

    .

    60

    , 4

    .

    1. ( //

    )

    2.

    3. (/ )

    4.

    2.

  • - 15 -

    .

    ,

    . (2008) ,

    "

    ", "

    ", " ",

    " ", " "

    .

    .

    (1994)

    .

    . (2006)

    , ,

    . ,

    ,

    .

    .

    . 2007 , ,

    1 . (2008)

    ,

    . "()"

    . "" ,

    .

  • - 16 -

    . ""

    " , ( /

    / )" " , "

    .

    3.

    2010 3 , 2010

    49.3%( 9.7%,

    39.6%) . 2000 10.4%, 2006

    8% . 2000 2010 10

    42.0% 54.0% ,

    7.4% 8.6%, 34.6% 45.6%

    . 10

    , .

    , ,

    , 4 .

    (1)

    .

    , , ,

    .

    .

    ", , , , ()16) 16) , , , , () , , , , .

  • - 17 -

    (,

    2006).

    .

    , .

    . ,

    .

    , ,

    . ,

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    . (

    , 2011). 2009

    25% 60%

    .

    .

    , ,

    .

    ,

    .

  • - 18 -

    (2)

    .

    , ,

    .

    ,

    .

    , , , (

    , 2011). 6 60

    50% .

    (2011) () () 200

    , 74%

    ,

    . ,

    . " "

    .

    .

    . ,

    ,

    .

    .

    ,

    ,

    (2011).

    ,

    .

  • - 19 -

    ,

    .

    .

    (3)

    2010 ,

    438 (5.6%),

    1208 (6.8%) .

    79 9.2%, 80 39.9%

    . ,

    . , , ,

    , , ,

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    , ,

    (

    , 2011).

    ,

    .

    ,

    .

    (4)

    . 6

  • - 20 -

    . 60

    4.2% . 2008

    " "

    . 2007

    65 4.2%.

    . (2011) ,

    , .

    , ,

    . "(

    )" ,

    (, 2006).

    .

    .

    . (2011)

    (2010) () 262

    .

    .

    , , ,

    .

    2

  • - 21 -

    1.

    Community

    () (, 2012). 1933

    Community" "()17)" , "

    " "" (,

    2010).

    1986

    , .

    ,

    (, 2008).

    (2007) ()

    ()18)

    . ()19)

    20)

    (, 2007; , 2012

    ).

    2000 "

    "

    , "

    " .

    17) .

    18) .

    19) . .

    20) . .

  • - 22 -

    2.

    Community service "()21)" .

    1986 ,

    "" .

    ,

    .

    . 3

    , ,

    (, 2010).

    1987 () "

    " , ,

    " ,

    "

    .

    1992

    3 ,

    . 1993 14

    .

    ()

    " , "

    ,

    "

    .

    2000

  • - 23 -

    ()>

    , , , ,

    , ,

    ,

    "

    .

    2006 4,

    . "()

    ,

    , ,

    " .

    " ,

    , , " .

    (, 2009).

    3.

    (1)

    ,

    2000 .

    5 . :

    , ,

  • - 24 -

    2011 ,

    ,

    , ,

    , .

    ,

    (, 2005).

    ,

    ,

    ,

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    ,

    . ,

    ,

    .

    ,

    , ,

    .

  • - 25 -

    , ,

    ,

    ,

    ,

    ,

    , ,

    ,

    , ,

    (2)

    2011 , 6,923

    8.7 . 3,515,

    44,237 ,

    50.81% .

    2006

    . (2012) .

  • - 26 -

    , ,

    ,

    , ,

    11 5 (2006-2010)

    , .

    , , ,

    , ,

    , , .

    (3)

    ,

    .

    1)

    , 2) , 3)

    ( ), , ,

    ) .

    (, 2011;

    , 2012 ).

    2010 2009

    2,157,935.

    .

    . 2008

  • - 27 -

    "()"

    ,

    . ,

    . ,

    .

    2009 452,

    775. .

    . 2005, 2010

    . , 2009

    5,992,530 .

    2011

    .

    ,

    .

    . (2009)

    (2010) , 4

    , (, ) ,

    , ,

    . 2009 2008

    51,715,3 (

    18,954.7 , 31,602.5 ,

    11,390.3 , 1,158.1 .

    3

  • - 28 -

    ,

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    , .

    - ",

    "", "" . (2008)

    "" ,

    .

    ,

    , "

    " . (2008)

    ,

    .

    , ,

    ,

    , , .

    , . 5

    (2008), (2009), (2010),

    (2011) . ,

    .

    ,

    . , (2011)

    , ,

  • - 29 -

    (2009) ,

    .

    , , ,

    .

    ,

    ,

    . (2010)

    ,

    " ", "

    ", " ", " "

    . ,

    ,

    .

    .

    , , , ,

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    , .

    ,

    .

    (2010), (2011), (2011)

    ,

    . (2010) ()

    , , ,

    ,

  • - 30 -

    . ,

    ,

    . ,

    . (2011) (2010)

    .

    ,

    ,

    .

    ,

    ,

    . (2011)

    ,

    , , ,

    4

    .

    .

    . ,

    , ,

    , ,

    . , , ,

    ,

    . ,

    ,

  • - 31 -

    ,

    .

    .

    ,

    , ,

    ,

    .

    , .

    ,

    .

  • - 32 -

    3

    ,

    .

    .

    1

    (2006)

    4 .

    , ( )(the bases of social

    allocation) ?

    , (the types of social provisions)

    ?

    , (the strategies of the

    delivery) ?

    , (the ways to

    finance) ? ( , 2006)

    ,

    " (who gets what)"

    . "

    (who)" .

    .

    .

  • - 33 -

    . (2006)

    .

    , , ,

    .

    ,

    .

    ,

    .

    ,

    , ,

    ,

    .

    ,

    . ,

    , ,

    . ,

    .

    , .

    2

  • - 34 -

    .

    .

    , , ,

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    ,

    . ()

    () ( ) (

    , 2011). ,

    (, 2011).

    .

    (2007)

    . , ()22) .

    , . ( )

    , .

    . , .

    , ,

    22) () .

    .

  • - 35 -

    ,

    . ,

    (, 2007). (2007)

    .

    .

    .

    .

    , , ,

    .

    18 12 1 ,

    .

    ,

    .

    , ,

    , (2006)

    ,

    , .

    (2007)

    .

    .

  • - 36 -

    3

    . ,

    ,

    , , ,

    .

    .

    .

    . ,

    .

    ,

  • - 37 -

    1. , , ,

    ?

    2.

    ?

    3. ?

    4. ?

    1.

    ?

    2. ,

    , ,

    ?

    3. ?

    . ,

    .

    ( ,

    , ,

    ) .

    ,

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    .

  • - 38 -

    4. ?

    5.

    ?

    .

    ,

    , ,

    .

  • - 39 -

    4

    20 .

    ,

    .

    .

    , , , , , , , ,

    , 11 .

    . 2013

    810 31

    23) .

    1987 1986

    .

    ,

    , ,

    .

    5

    .

    . ,

    23) , ,

    .

    . ,

    () . .

    , , , ,

    ,

    .

  • - 40 -

    1 o 27,

    ,

    3

    2 o 29,

    ,

    4

    3 oo 35,

    ,

    3

    4 o 31,

    6

    5 oo 36,

    ,

    13

    /

    1 o 71 ,

    2 oo 74,

    3 oo 71,

    , , ,

    .

    . ,

    ,

    . 2012

    2012

    75.6% .

    .

    , .

  • - 41 -

    4oo

    (:)

    ()

    61

    (65),

    5 oo 82,

    6 o 66,

    7 oo 62,

    8oo

    (:)

    ()

    73

    (75)

    ,

    8, 5,

    13 .

    8 .

    5

    . 1

    . 2

    ,

    . 3

    .

    4 .

    5

    . 3, 4, 7, 8

    .

    . 3, 7

    , 4

    .

    . 8 .

  • - 42 -

    .

    .

    1

    (2006)

    . .

    .

    .

    ,

    . ,

    , ,

    ,

    .

    1. :

    . .

    .

    (2006)

    .

  • - 43 -

    , ,

    .

    .

    , , ,

    . ,

    , ,

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    .

    ,

    , ,

    .

    2. : 24)

    11

    . (), ,

    .

    .

    24) 1~5 .

  • - 44 -

    .

    , . 2008

    65 .

    , ,

    , 11 .

    65 .

    , . 80 ,

    80 100

    . (, , , )

    .

    ,

    . ()

    200 (

    , 2010).

    , .

    80%~90%

    .

    .

    , . ,

    8

    . ,

    ,

    , .

    .

  • - 45 -

    .

    .

    , .

    .

    .

    . ,

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    , , .

    ,

    .

    .

    ,

    . ,

    .

    , , , ,

    ,

    .

    .

  • - 46 -

    , .

    (

    , 2010). ""25)

    , .

    , .

    .

    , , (

    , 2010).

    .

    .

    , , , ,

    .

    .

    .

    .

    . , , ,

    .

    , . 60

    .

    () ,

    , ,

    .

    25) 1 .

    .

  • - 47 -

    .

    .

    - 11 .

    .

    (

    , 2010).

    .

    3~5

    . , ,

    , .

    ,

    .

    , ,

    . ""

    .

    3. :

    ,

    , ,

    .

    , .

  • - 48 -

    , ,

    .

    (1)

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    (,

    2010).

    2009 3

    ()

    .

    . 3

    200

    .

    .

  • - 49 -

    2010 1

    . 9

    . ()

    , , ,

    , , ,

    , ,

    .

    .

    ,

    ,

    .

    . ,

    .

    , ,

    , ,

    . ,

    .

    , .

    , .

    ,

    .

    ,

    .

    , .

    , . /

  • - 50 -

    .26)

    4.

    .

    , , .

    , . , . ,

    .

    . ,

    . , . ,

    (, 2010).

    .

    2013 7, 8, 9

    889,242.6

    296,414.2.

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    5

    .

    .

    ,

    26) 1, 5 .

  • - 51 -

    .

    .27)

    .

    . 2010 , 20

    , 21

    ,

    .

    .

    .

    . ()

    . "

    ()" .28) , 2013 9

    2828

    . 163

    , 5288

    . ,

    , 4604, 1133. ,

    () .

    .

    .

    1987 8.46

    , 3.5 . 123

    27) 1 .

    28) "" .

  • - 52 -

    , 2046, 4880

    . 492 279 56%

    . 1999

    1428.

    , .

    . , ,

    . ,

    , .

    8 2002

    () . ,

    .

    ,

    , ,

    .

    .

    .

    . .

    .

    .

    .

  • - 53 -

    .

    .

    . ,

    .

    , .

  • - 54 -

    2

    . , , , , , 6

    4, 8

    .

    1.

    8

    . 8

  • - 55 -

    .

    Case 1

    o

    () () . 1990

    .

    . 2002

    ()29)

    .

    2002 .

    1 , , ,

    . .

    Case 2

    oo

    74 . 25

    8 .

    ,

    . 1999

    .

    .

    . .

    29) () ,

    .

    . 21 .

  • - 56 -

    Case 3

    oo

    71 . 60

    .

    . 2002

    . 67

    .

    Case 4

    oo

    61 . 30

    , .

    . 2000 .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    Case 5

    oo 82

    .

    . 30 .

  • - 57 -

    . 10

    .

    . 82

    .

    .

    .

    .

    Case 6

    o

    66 .

    .

    . 3

    .

    .

    .

    .

    Case 7

    oo

    62 .

    . 1

    .

    .

    .

  • - 58 -

    . .

    .

    Case 8

    oo

    .

    .

    . .

    .

    .

    .

    . ,

    .

    2.

    (2006) "

    (who gets what)" .

    . .

    ,

    ,

    .

    4 , , ,

  • - 59 -

    .

    .

    .

    (1)

    1500

    .

    .

    .

    . 1500

    . ,

    .

    .

    .

    . ,

    ,

    .(1 )

    . .

    . .

    . ,

    .(2 )

  • - 60 -

    .

    . .

    . .

    .(4 )

    . .

    .

    ?(5 )

    .

    . ,

    . ,

    . ,

    .

    . .

    .

    . .(1 )

    ? . .(5

    )

    , .

    .(6 )

  • - 61 -

    .

    (2)

    .

    . ,

    .

    .

    .

    .

    . .

    . .

    .

    .

    , .(1

    )

    .

    . .

    .

    . .(2

    )

  • - 62 -

    .

    .

    . .

    .(3 )

    . .(4

    )

    . .

    . (6 )

    .

    , .

    .

    . . .

    . .

    .(8 )

    ,

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

  • - 63 -

    .

    " .

    .(1 )

    . .

    . .

    . .(2

    )

    .

    .(3 )

    .

    . .

    . (6 )

    , .

    ,

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

  • - 64 -

    .

    .

    .(4 )

    .

    . .

    . 3 .

    .

    . (5 )

    .

    (3)

    .

    .

    , , , .

    ,

    . . ,

    .

    .

    . .

  • - 65 -

    , ,

    . .(1

    )

    .

    . .

    .(2 )

    .

    .(3 )

    . .

    ,

    .

    .

    . (4 )

    " , ,

    .

    .(5 )

    .

    .

    . (6 )

    . .

  • - 66 -

    . .

    . ,

    .(7 )

    6.

    70 .

    .

    .

    . .(8 )

    ,

    ,

    .

    .

    . ,

    ,

    . .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    ,

    . .(1

    )

  • - 67 -

    . . .

    .(2 )

    .

    .

    .

    .(3 )

    .

    . (4 )

    .

    .

    .(5 )

    .

    .(6 )

    .

    . .

    .(8

    )

  • - 68 -

    .

    .

    (4)

    (, 2011).

    ,

    .

    .

    .

    .

    . . ,

    ,

    . . .

    . .

    . .(1

    )

    . .

    . ,

    .

    .

    .(2 )

  • - 69 -

    . .

    . ,

    .(3 )

    .

    ."(4 )

    " . . (5 )

    " .

    . .

    ."(8 )

    ,

    ,

    .

    .

    .

    . (2011)

    . .

    .

    .

    .

    .

  • - 70 -

    "

    . .

    .(3 )

    " ,

    .

    .

    , . .

    ?

    . ,

    .

    . .

    ?(6 )

    .

    .

    . . ,

    .

    , .

    .

    .(8

    )

    ,

    . , , ,

  • - 71 -

    . ,

    .

    .

    ,

    , .(1 )

    "

    .

    .(1 )

    .

    .(5 )

    ,

    . 4, 5

    .

    .

    . . .(4

    )

    " . , .

  • - 72 -

    ."(5 )

    .

    .

    .

    3

    .

    .

    .

    1.

    .

    (, 2010).

    .

    .

    .

  • - 73 -

    " .

    ."(1

    )

    .

    .

    " .

    .

    .

    ."(1 )

    ,

    .

    .

    (, 2010).

    .

    2.

    (1)

    ,

    .

  • - 74 -

    ,

    ,

    (, 2010). ,

    , ,

    .

    " .

    . , ."(2

    )

    ,

    .

    .

    .

    "

    . .

    .

    . ,

    .

    ."(1

    )

    , .

    (, 2010).

  • - 75 -

    .

    .

    .

    " .

    . .

    ."(2 )

    "

    . ."(3

    )

    ,

    . ,

    , .

    (2)

    .

    , . ,

    , .

    .

    " .

    .

    . , ,

    , .

  • - 76 -

    , .

    ."(2 )

    " .

    ."(2 )

    , .

    ,

    .

    .

    .

    "?

    ? .

    .

    ."(2 )

    3.

    (1)

    ,

    (, 2010).

    , .

    2

  • - 77 -

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    . ,

    .

    " .

    .

    .

    ,

    . ."(2

    )

    (2)

    ,

    . , ,

    .

    .

    (,

    2010).

    .

  • - 78 -

    . ,

    . ,

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    " ."(1 )

    .(5 )

    .

    .

    .(4 )

    ,

    .

    .

    "

    . ."(1

    )

  • - 79 -

    (3)

    .

    .

    (, 2010). ,

    , ,

    .

    . ,

    .

    .

    .

    (, 2010).

    , ,

    .

    ,

    (, 2010).

    ,

    .

    4.

    .

    . , , ,

  • - 80 -

    , , ,

    .

    .

    "

    ."(1 )

    ,

    .

    .(2

    )

    ,

    , ,

    .

    ,

    (, 2007).

    .

    5.

    (1)

    (, 2010).

  • - 81 -

    ,

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    . ,

    .

    (, 2010).

    (2)

    .

    .

    . - ( -

    : http://bj.ccn360.com)

    . 2/3

    .

    2010,

    2011 .

    .

  • - 82 -

    .

    .

  • - 83 -

    5

    18 ,

    ,

    . 12 1

    ,

    ,

    . "

    , , " . ""

    2015 100%

    .

    ,

    . ,

    .

    (, 2013).

    (, 2013).

    ,

    .

    ()30)

    30) (): 2013

    " " . " " "

    , , , , ,

  • - 84 -

    . , ,

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    ,

    . (2006) ,

    , ,

    , ,

    , ,

    , , . ,

    .

    1 :

    , , ,

    .

    , .

    , ,

    .

    " . " "

    .

  • - 85 -

    ,

    . ,

    ,

    , 11

    . 65

    . 80 ,

    80 100

    . (

    , , , )

    . , .

    ,

    .

    .

    . (

    , ,

    . .

    1.

    .

    .

    .

    . .

  • - 86 -

    )

    , .

    , .

    .

    .

    .

    ,

    1

    . ,

    .

    ,

    , .

    2.

    .

    , , ,

    .

    .

  • - 87 -

    ,

    .

    1 1

    .

    .

    .

    . ,

    .

    3.

    ,

    , , .

    .

    . ,

    . ,

    .

    . .

    .

  • - 88 -

    , .

    ,

    ,

    .

    . ,

    ,

    .

    .

    ,

    , .

    . , ,

    .

    , , , ,

    .

    . ,

    , .

    4.

    .

    . ,

    . ,

    .

  • - 89 -

    . ,

    .

    , , , ,

    .

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    () , ,

    ,

    ,

    .

    .

    . ,

    ,

    .

    .

    .

  • - 90 -

    . , ,

    , .

    ,

    .

    2 :

    (2007) (, ,

    , )

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    , , ,

    .

    1.

    ,

  • - 91 -

    .

    ,

    . 6

    .

    .

    .

    .

    , .

    . ,

    .

    .

    . ,

    .

    .

    . ,

    ,

    . (2013)

    , .

    .

    . , ,

  • - 92 -

    , .

    .

    2.

    2011

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    . , .

    . , .

    . ,

    . ,

    .

    .

    .

    .

  • - 93 -

    . ,

    .

    . .

    3.

    .

    , ,

    .

    ,

    . .

    (1)

    ,

    .

    .

    . ,

    .

    , ,

    .

    .

    .

    .

  • - 94 -

    . ,

    .

    ,

    ,

    (, 2010).

    . ,

    .

    (2)

    .

    .

    .

    .

    (Case management)

    . (Case management)

    .

    (

    , 2006). (2010)

    ,

    .

    .

    ,

    .

  • - 95 -

    ,

    .

    , , , , , 6 ,

    , (

    , 2005).

    , ,

    .

    (3)

    , .

    .

    .

    , ,

    , ,

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    .

    ,

    . ,

    . ,

    .

    .

  • - 96 -

    4.

    .

    , , , ,

    .

    . ,

    , ,

    .

    (1)

    .

    .

    .

    . ()31)

    (, 2013).

    ()32)

    .

    ,

    (, 2013).

    . ,

    ,

    31) (): , ,

    .

    32) (): () () () () () . .

  • - 97 -

    , .

    (2)

    2013 7 1

    ,

    . (2013)

    . ,

    .

    ,

    .

    (3)

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    , .

    (4)

  • - 98 -

    . , .

    .

    . ,

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    .

    3

    , ,

    . ,

    .

    .

    .

    , ,

    .

    .

    .

    , , ,

  • - 99 -

    , .

    , ,

    .

    () .

    ,

    .

    .

    , , ,

    .

    ,

    .

    1.

    ,

    .

    . 1-2

    .

    .

    2. ,

  • - 100 -

    .

    .

    .

    . , ,

    , , , ,

    . ,

    .

    .

  • - 101 -

    6

    1

    2000 .

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    , , , ,

    5 . ,

    .

    ,

    . , ,

    , ,

    .

    ,

  • - 102 -

    . , - 1

    1 .

    .

    . .

    , ,

    .

    , .

    . , , ,

    , , , , , , , ,

    .

    , , ,

    . 8

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    ,

    .

  • - 103 -

    .

    .

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    .

    .

    . ,

    ,

    .

    . ,

    ,

    . ,

    . ,

    , ,

  • - 104 -

    . ,

    . ,

    .

    18 12 1 ,

    .

    , , ,

    .

    (2006)

    ,

    .

    ,

    .

    . ,

    .

    , , ,

    .

    , ,

    , , .

    , , .

    , , , ,

    .

    , , ,

  • - 105 -

    .

    , ,

    .

    .

    , , ,

    , . ,

    ,

    .

    ,

    , .

    2

    21

    .

    ,

    . ,

    . , ,

    .

    ,

    . ,

    , ,

  • - 106 -

    .

    ,

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    ,

    , (, 2005).

    . 1993

    , 12

    , ,

    . 1997

    2004

    . , 2007

    2009

    (, 2009; , 2011 ).

    . (2011)

    Chow(2011)

    , ,

    (, 2011).

  • - 107 -

    ,

    , .

    .

    , , ,

    (, 2006).

    ,

    , (, 2006).

    .

    , ,

    .

    .

    (, 2002).

    ,

    , .

    3 ,

    .

    . 8

  • - 108 -

    8

    . 8

    .

    .

    .

    .

    . ,

    ,

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    ,

    .

    .

  • - 109 -

    (2009). :

    .

    (2006). . :

    (2006). . :

    (2006). . :

    (2005). :

    .

    (2011). .

    . Vol.6 No.1. 83-109

    (2012). :

    .

    (2002). ,

    (2011).

    .

    (2002). :

    .

    (2013). .

    . Vol.14 No.3. 191-211

    (1996). .

    (2009). . :

    (2005). . :

    (2006). :

    .

    (2007). :

  • - 110 -

    . NGO.8(2), 235-263

    (2006). . :

    (2008). . . 2, 105-109

    (2009). . . 313-320

    (2011). .

    (2009). -.

    (2011). .

    (2012). .

    (2011)..

    (2010). -.

    . 6, 10-11

    (2013). -

    . . 2

    (2010). . . 9,

    139-143

    (1994). . .

    210-217

    (2012). .

    (2010). .

    . 3, 155-159

    (2010). . . 3(31), 32-36

    (2007). -.

    . 3(). 43-45

    (2010). -

  • - 111 -

    . . 4, 76-83

    (2013). . . 1

    (2010). . . 6, 58-60

    (2010). . . 4, 91-93

    (2007). .

    . 5, 24-27

    (2011). .

    (2002). . . 1, 33-36

    (2006) . .

    (2009). -.

    (2009). -

    .

    (2010). .

    . 2

    (2007). .

    . 6, 105-107

    (2010). .

    . 6(30), 1718-1721

    (2010). .

    . 8(7), 41-43

    (2006). .

    (2006). .

    (2005). .

    ). 2, 29-44

    (1986). .

    (2002). . . 5(3), 67-69

  • - 112 -

    (2003). . . 6, 196-197

    (2008). .

    (2010). .

    (2006). . . 3, 118-136

    (2006). . . 1, 96-108

    (2009). .

    . 6, 325-328

    (2008). . .

    6(2), 69-70

    (2008). .

    (2012). .

    . 11, 148-149

    (2008). .

    (2006). . . 3, 120-123

    (2010). -R.

    (2010). . .

    20, 2973-2975

    2011). -

    .

    (2010). -.

    (2009). . .

    11(), 58-61

    (2011). -

    .

    (2011). . . 15(1),

    59-60

  • - 113 -

    (2006). .

    ). 8, 434-437

    (2002). .

    (). 23(1), 25-27

    (2001). . 3(15)

    (2002). . . 11, 38-40

    (2006). .

    . 3, 11-16

    (2001).

    . . 4, 55-61

    (2010). . .

    12, 188-190

    (2011). .

    . 1, 41-43

    2013(2013)

    ( 1992)(1993)

    (2002)

    (2006)

    ( 2008)

    (2007)

    (2000)

    (2011)

    (2008-2011)(2010)

    ( 2010)

  • - 114 -

    2010)

    ""(2006-2010)(2011)

    ""(2011-2015)(2011)

    http://www.baidu.com/

    http://www.jinghua.cn/

    http://bj.ccn360.com/

    http://www.people.com.cn/

    http://old.cncaprc.gov.cn:8080/

    http://www.xinhuanet.com/

    http://www.xinmin.cn/

    http://www.mca.gov.cn/

    http://www.stats.gov.cn/

    http://www.china.com.cn/

    http://www.cnki.net/

  • - 115 -

    Abstract

    A Study on Community service for

    Urban empty nest elderly in China

    - Focusing on Beijing area -

    ZOU LUOYI

    Department of Social Welfare

    The Graduate School

    Seoul National University

    This study analyzes the community service system of empty

    nest elderly and put forward the new pattern centers on rapid

    raised empty nest elderly in Beijing, by China has stepped

    into aging society after 2000. Now China is strengthening the

    role of community service and finding solutions for varieties of

    social problems caused by aging society. Absolutely, family

    pension is also an important aspect. But the research about

    this aspect is still in progress. The objective of this study is

    analyzing community service for the empty nest elderly. And

    hope to make contribute for elderly welfare policy and practice

    further improve the social welfare of China.

    Current community service in Beijing is following the

    pattern government deciding the policy and community

    carryout the service with the volunteers and organizations.

    Varieties of these services are financial service, medical

    treatment service, daily life service, spiritual culture service,

  • - 116 -

    visiting service. Community gets the management power from

    Street Office, street Office gets the management power form

    Ministry of Civil Affairs, and Municipal Government

    managements all the subsidiary organizations. So services for

    community empty nest elderly are supported by the

    government and can get extra resources form Street Office,

    Ministry of Civil Affairs and Municipal Government.

    Meanwhile when External agency provides services for empty

    nest elderly, they almost provide most amount of the budget.

    Community organizations and human form are usually

    composed by state-owned unit and neighborhood committee.

    This study interviewed 8 empty nest elderly in Beijing.

    Evaluating whether the following four aspects (economic

    aspect, medical aspect, daily caring aspect and mental &

    culture aspect) of the services they are receiving have been

    satisfied and get the following conclusion:

    First, on practice economic problems of empty nest elderly

    havent been solved because of financial deficits and support

    methods; Secondly, on the aspect of medical service, generally

    medical center in all communities can provide basic medical

    demand. But medical service for serious disease is still under

    progress. Thirdly, to the aspect of daily caring service, it just

    generally satisfied the demand of empty nest elderly except

    few unhelpful feedbacks because of the resource partitioning

    and human resource. Lastly, mental & culture service mainly

    help elderly people through providing cultural activities.

    Although cultural activity may reduce loneliness, it doesnt

    resolve psychological problems for elderly people, and

  • - 117 -

    nonprofessional service is provided.

    As a whole, current problems of Chinese empty nest elderly

    community service can be divided as: resource management

    policy, the lack of evaluation system, human source problem,

    insufficient service, lack of self-propaganda. In conclusion,

    community service policy progress and academic research

    improve is needed.

    This study presents new community service system based on

    the conclusion under the new government background. Firstly,

    empowerment and family service approach for empty nest

    elderly service on conveying system aspect has been

    emphasized. Community service range and necessary resource

    & facility should be expanded. Also the propaganda should be

    expanded, too. Case management should be applied for service

    providing course. The government should ensure the welfare of

    empty nest elderly through: record the policy for elderly

    parents who have lost their only child; child supporting

    policy; community social role intensity policy and enhance of

    human resources policy. Community service presents four

    demands: economic, medical, daily caring, mantel & culture.

    The new government emphasizes the important of welfare

    career. It can be expected that input for community service

    system will increase. Specific resource using such as

    community employee resource expand, service varieties

    expand, cash or items support, community facility expand,

    external social resource combine. On the last, as for the

    human resource aspect, it presents remands such as

    community social worker technicality enhance, volunteer

  • - 118 -

    expand, education and administration policy importing.

    Keywords: Empty nest elderly, community, community service,

    empty nest elderly demand

    Student number: 2011-24012

    1 1 2

    2 1 2 3

    3 1 2 3

    4 1 2 3

    5 1 : 2 : 3

    6 1 2 3 ,

    Abstract