1 in-beam observables rauno julin department of physics university of jyväskylä jyfl finland
TRANSCRIPT
1
In-Beam ObservablesRauno Julin
Department of Physics University of Jyväskylä
JYFLFinland
3
, p, β, … e−,
promptevents= In-Beam
delayed events
tagged with
Ge ArrayFocal planeDetectors
SeparatorBeam
Data Readout
Combination of In-Beam and Delayed Events
Best resolution in gamma-ray spectroscopy
4
Sn
Pb
very neutron deficient heavy nuclei can be produced via fusion evaporation reactions cross-sections down to 1 nb short-living alpha or proton emitters → tagging methods
Nb
Example: In-beam probing of Proton-Drip Line and SHE nuclei
6
Yrast vs. non-Yrast
All known energy levels in 116Sn
Only a very limited set of levels close to the yrast line can be seen
Close to the valley of stability:
Far from stability:
7
Example: in-beam spectroscopy at the extreme - 180Pb
4+ →
2+
6+ →
4+
8+ →
6+
2+ →
0+
α-α tagged singles in-beam γ-ray spectrum
92Mo(90Zr,2n)180Pb, 10 nanobarn
P. Rahkila et al. Phys. Rev. C 82 (2010) 011303(R)
Oblate Prolate
186Pb104
Spherical
Energy-level systematics: Pb - isotopes
Prolate
Oblate
Spherical
Level systematics of even-A Pb nuclei
N = 104180Pb
8
Verification of shape coexistence
9
Oblate 4p-2h Spherical 0p-0h
Prol
ate
6p-4
h
Energy-level systematics vs. Ground - state radia
Understanding of ground-state properties
11
Verification of prolate shape in 185Pb
Coupling of the i13/2 neutron ”hole” to the prolate core
Strongly coupled band
12
Energy – level systematics: Coulomb-Energy Differences
A=66 is the heaviest triplet of T = 1 bands up to 6+
N = Z
TED =Ex(Tz= -1) + Ex(Tz= +1) - 2 Ex(Tz= 0)V = vpp + vnn - 2vpn
Charge independence One-body terms cancel out
TED=Triple Energy Differences
Isospin non-conserving contribution is needed !
T = 1 band66Se32
2+
4+
6+
14
Kinematical moment of inertia
Dynamical moment of inertia
= arithmetical average of over
Quantal system
Measured
Basics
15
J vs. deformation
Quadrupole deformed rigid rotor
not much dependent on deformation !
~ SD band in 152Dy
~ SD band in 193Bi
~ fission isomer in Pu
Fluid
strongly depends on deformation !
18
PROLATE
OBLATE
Rigid:J(1) ~ 1 + 0.3β
Hydrodynamical:J(1) ~ β2
→
Need B(E2) , Qt
J(1)(rig) = 110
Example: Coexisting shapes in light Pb region
19
180 Pb
Alignments:
180Pb behaves like 188Pb→ Mixing with oblate structures
Subtracting a reference details
20
Subtracting a reference details
Alignments near N =104:
Open symbols – Hg’sFilled symbols – Pb’s
Why Pb’s more scattered ?
23
• Recoil distance Doppler-shift (RDDS) lifetime measurements (plunger).
• Combined with selective recoil-decay tagging method.
In-beam lifetime measuremets
24
│Qt │
J(1)
... for 194Po 196Po 186Pb and 188Pb
Example: Lifetimes for shape coexisting levels in light Pb’s and Po’s
Pb:│Qt │ → │β2 │ = 0.29(5) for the ”pure” prolate states
Po:│Qt │ → │β2 │ = 0.17(3)
for the oblate states- the ground state of 194Po is a pure
oblate 4p-2h state ?
25
Beyond-mean-field calculations by M. Bender et al.vs. the exp. data
Theor.Theor.
Exp
Exp vs. Theory
26
J(1) identical for prolate intruder bands in N ~ 104 Pt, Hg and Pb identical collectivity (⇒ Qt)?
Example: Collectivity of the intruder bands in light Pt, Hg and Pb nuclei
27
oblate
prolate
Collectivity of the intruder bands in light Pt, Hg and Pb nuclei
Is the collectivity really decreasing with decreasing Z ?
28
Δν=2
Δν=0
0+
2+
4+
6+
8+
0
2
2
22
ν
Testing the simple seniority picture: B(E2)-value systematics, N=122
Example: Experimental difficulties
8+ is long living impossible to determine the lifetimes of the 6+, 4+ and 2+ members of the multiplet
33
Interpretation: Weak mixing ( 10/90) between the spherical 0+ state and the deformed 2neutron-2hole intruder 0+ state (ß = 0,27)
Comment :
= 8.7 × 10-3 is a small value for an E0 transition in light nuclei
Does it make sense to apply such a simple model for such a weak E0 ?
Example: 2neutron-2 hole intruders on the island of inversion
34
Example: 2neutron-2 hole intruders on the island of inversion
The simple two-level mixing model:
!!
Simple shell-model:
”Single-particle” value: = 40 × 10-3 (A=44)
(= E0 connecting 50/50 mixed 0+ states involving 2 protons occupying orbitals from different oscillator shells )
E0’s involving neutron excitations :
(if no state-dependent monopole effective charge for neutrons)