1 victor delvalle - 22
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/7/2019 1 Victor DelValle - 22
1/8
-
8/7/2019 1 Victor DelValle - 22
2/8
2
Before the wide spread use of PCM products can be initiated there are a number of technical issues that need to be better
understood and resolved. One of them is the long-term performance of PCM products and the other is encapsulation and
containment of PCM for use in building applications. This paper will focus on the fist of these two issues.
The concept of using PCM materials for the application for the thermal energy storage in houses is not new (Kedl and
Stovall, 1989). The pioneering effort to apply PCM materials in residential housing was done by Telkesin 1947 (Telkes,
1947).Presently, a revival of this approach is observed (Schmidt), (Szymocha, 2007). The application of PCM based
heat storage systems not only resolves the problem of high density heat storage between energy supply (day) and demand
(night) but also may improve the performance and reliability of the heating systems by providing a more constanttemperature profile for heat storage. In the near future, PCM materials will play an important role as a heat buffer in
many applications that will make energy utilization much more practical and efficient. In the next decade, significantly
increased research activity in this area is expected.
PCM MATERIALS
When a PCM changes state from solid to liquid, or vice versa, it absorbs a large quantity of thermal energy while its
temperature remains relatively constant. These latent heat storage systems are preferred due to the large energy storage
density and practically isothermal nature of the storage process. Table 1 provides heat storage capacity potential
comparison between some common heat storage materials. For example, the PCM in form of the calcium chloride
hexahydrate (CCH) can store 9 (based on mass) or 14 (based on volume) times more heat than water when applied in
temperature range of 25 - 30C.
Table 1 Comparison of Heat Storage Capacity (in temperature range from 25 to 30C)
Material Heat storage capacity
by weight kJ/kg by volume kJ/dm3
Concrete 4.4 8.8
Water 21 21
Wax (n-Octadecane, C18H38) 212 175
Hydrated salt, CaCL26H2O 196 294
As a result the application of PCM materials can significantly reduce the overall volume or size of the heat storage
system. The significant volume reduction makes it possible to implement PCM materials into building elements such as
walls, floors or ceilings. There are many PCM materials available, with a phase change temperatures covering a widerange of applications. Some of them can operate at temperatures as high as 600C.
Hydrated salts, because of their low costs are very attractive for use as thermal storage in residential buildings.
However, some of them have a tendency for super-cooling, segregation and long-term performance deterioration, and
this might limit their long term practical application. When applying PCM materials in a building one of the most
important aspects is the long term stability and performance of the PCM over thousands of cycles. The long-term
stability of the organic materials has been confirmed. However, for inorganic materials (such as salt hydrates) there is
the possibility for some aging of PCM materials which will have some impact on the long term heat storage capacity.
Having the ability to test and confirm the long-term stability of potential PCM products is very important. It is predicted
that the implementation of PCM heat storage systems in residential, commercial, industrial and agriculture sectors will
be an evolving and growing trend in the continuing effort to develop high performance energy efficient buildings and
structures.
METHODS FOR MEASURING OF HEAT STORAGE CAPACITY
To determine the specific heat andlatent heat of materialsa number of methods such as differential thermal analysis
(DTA) or differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) are commonly used (Li, J, et al, 1985). These methods are very well
developed and accurate but they use only small micro-samples of the test material. When evaluating the performance of
these materials for commercial scale use a test method that can accommodate a larger sample may provide additional
information on the long-term stability of the product. It is believed that a very small sample, taken out of the large
testing specimen and out of testing system, might not reflect properly the bulk materialcharacteristics. During long-term
performance testing, when undergoing huge number for freezing/melting cycles, large PCM specimens often are subject
-
8/7/2019 1 Victor DelValle - 22
3/8
3
to settling or stratification and are typically not perfectly homogeneous. For large size samples, testing using a non-
invasive method for heat of fusion and specific heat determination is necessary.
An interesting, recently developed simple method, known as T-history method, for the specific heat and thermal
conductivity determination was proposed by Zhang (Zhang et al., 1998). In this method, temperature-time relationship
curves of tested PCM sample are used to determine their thermo-physical properties. To enhance the measurement
accuracy, the method has been further modified (Zhang, Jiang, 1999), (Hong et al., 2004), (Marin et al., 2003, 2005).
However, this method being very simple, is relatively time consuming and troublesome, when applied for long-term
cycling evaluation. A specific problem is identification of the boundaries of the phase change period (the beginning andthe end), which is critical for accurate heat of fusion value determination.
A new method, called a double cell, was developed by the authors with designation for long-term PCM materials
testing. The double cell method is calorimetric type of method that allows measurement and comparison of the heat
storage capacity over numerous cycles. The testing strategy with cycling apparatus relies on alternative symmetric
heating and cooling under controlled conditions of a relatively large PCM sample (1-2 kg) that is located inside a well
insulated enclosure. While not as accurate a method for the determination of the heat storage capacity of small
specimens it is believed to provide good information for researchers and developers of commercialor larger scale
products who want to see the overall heat storage performance of bulk samples over a large number of cycles.
TESTING SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
In the double cell method the heat storage capacity is determined by measurement of the amount of the thermal energyrequired to melt the PCM sample under well specified conditions. The diagram of the testing apparatus is shown in
Figure 1.
Figure 1. Thermal cycling apparatus for the long-term PCM testing top view.
The PCM material, with a total weight of 2,000 g, is split in two equal size portions, enclosed in two plastic pouches and
put into well thermally insulated box in a vertical position. The pouches are separated by a thin metal membrane and are
sandwiched between two heating/cooling copper plates. The symmetrically heated or cooled pouches are equipped with a
Buffer Air
Temperature
Outlet
Inlet
PCM
Sample B
PCM
Sample A
Cooling
system
Heating
system with
controller
Data
logger
Thermal
insulation
envelopes
Temperature
sensors
-
8/7/2019 1 Victor DelValle - 22
4/8
4
set of temperature sensors located on both sides of the pouches. The pouches are subjected to alternative heating
(electrical heating) and cooling (liquid cooling) cycles. During heating, the temperature controller automatically adjusts
the temperature of the heating plates to the preset temperature (e.g. 60C for the heating cycle). The heating cycle lasts
as long as required to reach the predetermined temperature in the internal space between PCM samples. Usually this
temperature is set about 5C above the phase change temperature of the material being tested. It is assumed that once all
temperature sensors on sample exceed the heating set point temperature complete PCM melting is achieved. After the
melting phase is complete the electrical heating system is shut-down and the cooling system is activated. The cooling
liquid, with a temperature of about 8C, is circulated through tubing welded to the copper plates. The cooling cycle is
continued until the temperature of the internal space between PCM samples decreases to approximately 6C below the
level of the phase change temperature and solid state of PCM sample is achieved. Once the low temperature limit is
achieved the cooling cycle is considered to be completed, cooling water is shut-of and the electrical heating system is
activated. Both, low and high temperatures can be set by the controller independently. Only during the heating period is
the energy consumption measured and recorded for the purpose of calculating the PCM heat storage capacity.
Measurements of the electrical energy consumed for heating is simple and accurate. The electrical energy measurements,
corrected for sensible heat of PCM sample, are used for the latent heat determination. The latent heat measurements are
performed every one hundred cycles and are averaged over 10 cycles to improve accuracy.
Before testing, the apparatus requires calibration to determine the system constant. The heat storage capacity and
transient heat loss of the well insulated test apparatus is empirically captured in the system constant. The determination
of the system constant is done with a specimen with known and stable heat storage capacity. The system constant does
not very much between cycles or samples and can be accounted for in all heat storage calculations. Before testing,
during sample preparation phase, for the each PCM specimen a small sub-sample of PCM was withdrawn and the heat of
fusion was measured independently by DSC method. A value for the latent heat from the DSC method was used as a
reference initial point.
The testing system is fully automated and does not require withdrawing any PCM sub-samples for analysis. As a result,
it is very convenient for long-term PCM cycling tests. Large PCM sample size gives the ability to investigate the
temperature gradient impact, freezing and cooling kinetics, observe super-cooling phenomenon and settling or
stratification effects. The system, when verified with paraffin, which is known for the long-term stability, proved very
good measurements reproducibility. During the initial stages of testing there was a problem with occasional pouch
leakages. To prevent such leakages, double-wall pouches were implemented and, practically, the leakages were
eliminated.
DISCUSSION AND RESULTS ANALYSIS ON A LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE
An example of the energy consumption curves form the system when testing a calcium chloride hexa-hydrate (CCH)
based PCM is shown in Figure 2. The amount of electrical energy required for performing one cycle of PCM melting
(after corrections for sensible heat and system constant) was used for latent heat determination and used as a heat storage
criterion. The computer controlled measurements of the consumed electrical energy (in Joules) was taken every second.
This one second information was totaled every three minutes and logged to accurately measure the energy consumed
over a 3 minute time interval.
The thermocouples located on both PCM samples made it possible to record timerelated temperature profiles. A multi-
channel data acquisition system collected and stored temperature readings every minute and the data was used for
determining when the PCM was fully melted or frozen. The temperature information from the various thermocouples
also allowed profiling the temperature changes throughout the sample by plotting temperature readings versus time. A
map to the thermocouple placement is given in Figure 3. All of the thermocouples used for determining the temperature
profile of the PCM were located on the inner surface of both specimens away from the copper heating/cooling plates.
An example of the profiles recorded by the temperature sensors are shown in Figure 4. Analysis of the graph shows that
the temperature of the heating plate remains fairly constant at around 60C during the heating cycle. The figure also
shows that there is a significant temperature gradient in vertical direction inside the samples and slight changes in a
cooling plates temperature (~10C 3C) during the freezing cycle. It is evident that melting begins at the top of the
-
8/7/2019 1 Victor DelValle - 22
5/8
5
sample and propagates towards the bottom. The solidification progresses in the opposite direction (i.e. from the bottom
to the top) and at the end of the cycle a cavity inside of PCM is created. The heating period is significantly shorter (~60
min) then cooling period (~175 min) and the overall time for each cycle was approximately 4 hours. The cycle time of
the system could be improved somewhat by chilling the inlet water further or by increasing its flow rate. The large
temperature gradient in the sample does suggest some errors in calculating the latent heat storage capacity of the material
using a single or small number of cycles even when the specific heat of the sample is known and accounted for.
However, the pattern of the temperature records is very well repeated over 100s to 1000s of cycles. The purpose of the
test method is to determine the long term stability and performance of the material over a large number of cycles so
errors or uncertainty in a few cycles are averaged out over time. From the temperature profiles, it can be seen that testedCCH samples have a very limited tendency for super-cooling.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Time, min
PowerW
Figure 2. Record of energy readings for energy consumption for 3 heating cycles for an internally formulated CCH
based PCM material at approximately 1500 cycles.
-
8/7/2019 1 Victor DelValle - 22
6/8
6
Figure 3: Simple mapping of the thermocouple locations on the inside bag surface for each PCM sample usedin the double wall testing apparatus.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 100 200 300 400 500
Time, min
Te
mperature,
Front plate
Back plate
T 1b
T 2b
T 3t
T 4t
T 5b
T 6b
T 7tT 8t
Water in
Water out
Figure 4: Example of the temperature profiles distributions during the heating and cooling cycles for an internally
formulated CCH based PCM material.
To determine the long-term stability of a PCM samples the heat storage capacity was evaluated every 100 cycles by
measuring the amount of energy used for the heating cycle (an average value for 10 cycles was used). Knowing the
established constant for the cycler, the heat storage capacity was calculated and recorded over numerous cycles. A
number of internally formulated calcium chloride hexahydrate based PCMs were evaluated (L-6 A, B, C) as well as
some commercially available formulations (TEAP-29 PCM). All formulations had a phase change temperature of
approximately 27C. Examples of the long-term stability testing results for the three samples are shown in Figure 5.
Heating plates
temperatures
Bottom set
of sensors
Top set
of sensors
-
8/7/2019 1 Victor DelValle - 22
7/8
7
0
50
100
150
200
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Cycle
Heatstoragecapacity,kJ/kg
TEAP
L-6C
L-6B
Figure 5. Long term heat storage capacity measurements for TEAP 29 and ARC CCH formulation L-6B and L-6C
PCM samples
The important part of the testing program was verification of the performance and the long-term stability of the
encapsulated PCM elements in conditions simulating the real application in terms of the sample size, orientation and the
temperature range. The significant size of the PCM samples created the possibility for simulation of real system
behavior with its negative effects like: temperature gradient development, super-cooling and settling or stratification.
Initial long-term tests results revealed some variation in the heat storage capacity. When the cycling curves were time
synchronized it was evident that changes are related to system disturbances. More in depth analysis found that unstableoperational conditions of the system (cooling water temperature and ambient air temperature) were main reasons for
some of the variation. After taking account of these factors the quality of the test results improved. Better control of the
ambient air and cooling water temperatures as well as improved insulation around the control specimen would improve
the overall accuracy and performance of the double wall test system.
From the performed tests it can be concluded that the performance of ARC internally formulated L-6 series CCH
samples is similar to the TEAP 29 sample which was used as reference sample. After 2,000 freeze-thaw cycles, TEAP
29 lost about 10% of original heat storage capacity. Two thousands cycles, assuming 100 cycles per year, represents
about 20 years of the system operation time. For sample L-6C, the heat storage capacity is more stable than for the
TEAP 29. After 1,600 cycles sample L-6C has showed very limited decrease (
-
8/7/2019 1 Victor DelValle - 22
8/8
8
To improve the overall quality and stability of the readings from the system, improvements in the ambient air and water
cooling temperature control as well as improved insulation would be required.
Based on the data obtained the following is concluded:
The double cell system performs well and is a convenient apparatus for the long-term bulk PCM samplestesting;
The reference inorganic TEAP sample of PCM performs well showing good stability over 2000 cycle period; The ARCs manufactured PCM samples (Series L-6) shows good stability when compared to the reference
TEAP sample and with a slightly higher heat overall heat storage capacity value.
It has been concluded from the long-term test results that no changes in the heat storage capacity and in the melting
temperature for investigated calcium chloride hexahydrate PCM material was identified when exposing the sample for a
large number of thermal cycles (2000 cycles).
Acknowledgements
This work was performed by ARC, Edmonton and was financially supported by Alberta Innovation and Science and
Natural Resources Canada (NRCan).
References
Sargent & Lundy LLC Consulting Group, Assessment of parabolic trough and power tower solar technology cost and
performance forecasts, Subcontractor report, NREL/SR-550-34440, Golden, Colorado Oct. 2003
Kedl R. J. Stovall, T., K., , Activities in support of the wax-impregnated wallboard concept, thermal energy storage
researches activity review, New Orleans , Louisiana, US Department of Energy, 1989
Telkes, M. Solar house heating a problem of heat storage, Heat. Vent., 46, 68, 1947
Telkes, M. , Solar energy storage. Am. Soc. Heat Refrig. Air Cond. Eng., 1947, 38-44
Schmidt, M. F. Intelligent temperature management with phase-change materials (PCMs) energy-efficient andeconomical, BASF AG, Ludwigshafen, Germany
Szymocha, K., Thermal solar system with direct heat storage for space heating and cooling. Proceedings of 3rd European
Solar Thermal Energy Conference, ESTEC 2007, 399-403
Li, J., Liu Z., and Ma C. An experimental study on the stability and reliability of the thermal properties of barium
hydroxide octahydrate as a phase change material, The Key Laboratory of Enhanced Heat Transfer and Energy
Conservation of the Education Ministry, China, 1985,
Zhang Y., Jiang Y., A simple method, the T-history method, of determining the heat of fusion, specific heat and thermal
conductivity of phase change materials. Measurement and Science Technology, 10, 1999, 201-205
Hong, H., Kim SK., Kim YS, Accuracy improvement of T-history method for measuring heat of fusion of various
materials, Int. Journal of Refrigeration, 27, 2004, 360-366
Marin, J. M., Lazaro, A., Zalba, B. IEA 8th Workshop Annex 17, ECES, 18-20 April 2005
Marin, J., M., , Zalba, B., Cabeza L., and Mahling, H., Determination of enthalpy-temperature curves of phase change
materials with the improvement to temperature dependent properties, Measurement, Science and Technology, 14, 2003,
184 -189