115-116115-116115-116115-116115-116
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/11/2019 115-116115-116115-116115-116115-116
1/4
115 Rights of the accused1. Rights of a accused constitutional/statutory2. Right to appeal statutory
CRIMINAL DUE PROCESS ELEMENTS1. Heard in a court of competent jurisdiction2. Preceded against under the orderly processes of law3. Gien notice and opportunity to !e heard". #udgment was awarded within authority of constitutional law
$ection 1% Rights of the accused at the trial1. PRESUMED INNOCENT
NONAI!A"LE
&'' criminal prosecutions right to !e presumed innocent until contrary
is P(R)
Reason% principle of justice and moral certainty
Reasona!le dou!t engendered !y an inestigation of whole proof and
an ina!ility* after such inestigation* to let the mind rest easy upon thecertainty of guilt1. &!solute certainty + demanded to conict#. ,-R&' R0&0 is re4uired as to eery proposition of proof
re4uisite to constitute the offense
Ratio% slightest possi!ility of an innocent man !eing conicted for an
offense he has not committed 5 letting a guilty person go unpunished fora crime he may hae perpetrated
4uipoise rule where the eidence of the parties in a criminal case are
eenly !alanced* the presumption of innocence will tilt in faour of theaccused 6 ac4uittalo 'egislature may enact that when certain facts hae !een proed 6
prima facie eidence of e7istence of guilty 8 shift the !urden of proofo PR-9% rational connection !etween facts proed 8 ultimate fact
presumedo 7amples%
1. :ne7plained flight2. ;ailure to e7plain possession of stolen property3. ;ailure to account funds and property of a P- entrusted to
him $';
-
8/11/2019 115-116115-116115-116115-116115-116
2/4
>. Re4uirementso (een arraigned
o )uly notified of trial
o :njustified non
-
8/11/2019 115-116115-116115-116115-116115-116
3/4
7am of rapist and ictim for gonorrhea alid
Pregnancy e7am adultery
:ltra iolet light for e7amination of presence of fluorescent
powder dusted on mar=ed money !uy !ust
;urnishing of a specimen of signature in a falsification of document case
is -9R) !y the righto ?riting is + purely a mechanical act 6 intelligence and attention
-0 include cases coered !y immunity statutes%
o R& 13 forfeiture of illegally o!tained wealth
o R& " !ri!ery and graft cases
?here aaila!le% R !ut also got proceedings penal sanction inoled
?here ino=ed% after as=ing of a B and !efore answering it
Rationale for protecting the right against self
-
8/11/2019 115-116115-116115-116115-116115-116
4/4
". &Ds assertion or non. Prejudice to &
Remedies%
1. ,0) iolation of right2. ?H illegal restraint3. Relief in madamus compel dismissal of information
ffect of dismissal for iolation of &Ds right to $0
o )ismissal 6 ac4uittal
o &ny attempt to prosecute for same offense 6 )#
$P) 0R&' &0 -; 1J @R& J"3A
)uty of the court after arraignment of &
o ourt shall order a pre