13-05-01: ru: shoygu & putin: military necessity for sustainable security coup d'etat
DESCRIPTION
13-05-01: RU: Shoygu & Putin: Military Necessity for Sustainable Security Coup d'etatTRANSCRIPT
PO Box 5042 * George East, 6539 * Cel: (071) 170 1954 * guerrylla-law.co.nr
Radical Honoursty Culture Yshmael Guerrylla Law Party CommonSism: Common Sense Guerrylla
Laws for a Sustainable Commons AEquilibriaex: balanced Eco/Anthropocentric law
www.guerrylla-law.co.nr
Sergey Kuzhugetovich Shoygu
General of the Russian Army
119160, Москва, ул. Знаменка, д.19
CC & c/o: Commanders of: Land Forces; Air
Force; Navy; Strategic Missile Forces; Air
and Space Defense; Airborne Troops; W.
Military Dist. S. Military Dist.; E. Military
Dist.; N. Fleet; Pacific Fleet; Baltic Fleet;
Black Sea Fleet (via: mil.ru : contacts)
President Putin
c/o: H E Mr M I Petrakov
Amb: Russian Federation Embassy
316 Brooks Street, Menlo Park, 0081
Tel: 012 362 1338 | Fax: 012 362 0116
Email: [email protected]
CC: RU Media, Org’s & Individuals
Notice to be sent to all Nations
THE URGENT MILITARY NECESSITY OF WORLDWIDE
SUSTAINABLE SECURITY COUP D’ETAT’S, IF WORLD’S VOTERS
& POLITICIANS FAIL TO ACT BEFORE 22 APRIL 2014
―We can't muster the force of nations to really begin fundamental
changes in their energy systems, their construction, their
lifestyle patterns, without a profound understanding of the
urgency of the situation. We've got to act now.‖ – Wesley Clark,
Supreme Allied Commander of NATO, 1996-1999, Climate Change is a
Global Security Threat1
World Citizens are urgently advised to sign the White House Petition (wh.gov/zjyC) to
avoid MILINT Earth Day Coup d'état‘s of the World‘s Democracies on Earth Day 2015;
by demanding their governments implement Sustainable Security Relocalization,
Decentralization, De-Industrialization & Primitivization measures, by 22 April 2014; &
turning off all coal, nuclear & fossil fuel sources to the National Grid on 22 April 2015.
If World‘s citizens fail; TYGAE call on the Worlds‘ Military to conduct worldwide
simultaneous MILINT Earth Day Coup d'état‘s; to end the ‗One Person, One Vote‘
policy and implement a ‗Sustainable Security Licence to Vote‘ policy; where only
Ecoliterate ‗Sustainable Leaver‘ citizens get the licence to vote.
If World‘s Military Officials fail, we face the certain extermination of humanity, by
2100, if not much sooner, due to the runaway feedback confluence of overpopulation,
overconsumption, resource scarcity induced conflict and climate change tipping points.
Failure of citizens/Military to act by (2014/2015); while they still can; will aggravate
the runaway feedback confluence, rendering it impossible and futile to act later.
1GO: Climate Change is a Global Security threat http://youtu.be/tz9vRxCMZUw (at 02:30)
Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC 2
Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC 3
Sustainability is Security:
―Climate, Energy together are the type of a crisis that could be
described as creeping up on you. You don't see them, until all of
a sudden you fall off a cliff.‖ - General Paul Kern (Ret), Former
Commander, Second Brigade of the 24th Infantry Division; Powering
Americas Defense - Energy and the Risks to National Security2
―There is no security without sustainability‖: In the absence of an international
new moral order where World Political, or Military Leaders implement Guerrylla
laws to regulate and reduce human procreation and resource utilization behaviour;
towards a sustainable, pre-industrial lifestyle paradigm; the runaway feedback
confluence of overpopulation, overconsumption, ecological tipping points, resource
scarcity and climate change, will generate scarcity induced conflict and war
(perhaps nuclear) confronting regions at an accelerated pace, resulting in the
―collapse of the global economic system and every market-oriented national
economy‖, by 2050, and extermination of humanity, by 2100.
[I] Sustainable Security Relocalization, Decentralization,
De-Industrialization and Primitivization:
―You can pay now, or you can pay a whole lot later. And by pay a
whole lot later, it‘s not just about paying in dollars, its
really about paying in American lives.‖ - Admiral John Natham,
United States Navy (Ret); Climate Patriots: A Military
Perspective on Energy, Climate Change and National Security3
Relocalize, Decentralize, De-Industrialize & Primitivization:
This is an urgent warning to the World‘s citizen voters, who value their ‗one person,
one vote‘ democracies, to demand their politicians implement Sustainable
Security Decentralization, De-Industrialization and Primitivization
measures, by 22 April 2014 - 09:11 GMT.
Citizens have two years to make their Relocalization and Decentralization
Prepping plans to deal with the reality that TYGAE is calling for all nations to
simultaneously turn off their coal, nuclear and fossil fuel energy sources to their
National Grid; on 22 April 2015.
―In my piece, the last third of it is a joint planning session
for an Energy policy for the United States between the ghost of
John Muir and the ghost of George Patton. Muir is only worried
about carbon and thinks terrorism is something the FBI can deal
with if anybody needs to. Patton is only worried about terrorism
2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfD5D_qzqoM 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjS9pU0y_JU
Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC 4
and thinks global warming is something these birkenstock wearers
cooked up somewhere between smoking tokes around the campfire or
something. They don't agree at all on the problems they are
trying to solve, but they keep finding that there is a very
substantial degree of overlap in the things that they want to do.
Because in so far as you move toward distributed generation of
electricity, because you are worried about the security of the
web, terrorist attacks on the web and the like, in so far as you
are putting solar energy on your roof, you are also going green,
because you can't put a coal fired power plant on your roof,
thank goodness.‖ - James Woolsey, Former CIA Director & Former
Undersecretary US Navy
[1] Economic Relocalisation? Relocalize Economic Power.
―Here are a few of my predictions: Many trends of the last
century or more, made possible by cheap and abundant energy
sources, are going to be reversed. These trends include
population growth, centralization of political and economic
power, vastly increased quantity of global trade, and mass
tourism. [..] Relocalization may be a new term, but conceptually
it has long roots. Some related recent precursors include
[Thoreau], E.F. Schumacher, Ted Trainer, Garrett Hardin, and
Wendell Berry as well as what are called the ―anti-globalization‖
movement, the ―slow food‖ movement, the ―voluntary simplicity‖
movement, the ―back to the land‖ movement, ―new urbanism,‖ [the
―prepping‖ movement], and the ―environmental movement.‖ In
general, common themes include decentralization of political and
economic structures, less material consumption and pollution, a
focus on the quality of relationships, culture and the
environment as sources of fulfillment, and downscaling of
infrastructural development.‖ - Jason Bradford, Ph.D, Economic
Relocalization: A Strategic Response to Peak Oil and Climate
Change4; The Oil Drum
Economic Relocalisation: A Strategic Response to Peak Oil and Climate
Change; Jason Bradford, Ph.D, The Oil Drum:
A. Relocalization is based on a systems approach that doesn‘t solve one set of
problems only to make another problem worse.
B. Relocalization is based on an ethic of protecting the Earth System--or
Natural Capital-- knowing that despite our cleverness, human well-being
is fundamentally derived from the ecological and geological richness of
Earth.
C. Relocalization starts from the premise that the world is a finite place and
that humanity is in a state of overshoot. Perpetual growth of the economy
4 http://www.theoildrum.com/node/2598
Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC 5
and the population is neither possible nor desirable. It is wise to start
planning now for a world with less available energy, not more.
D. Relocalization advocates rebuilding more balanced local economies that
emphasize securing basic needs. Local food, energy and water systems are
perhaps the most critical to build.xxv In the absence of reliable trade
partners, whether from peak oil, natural disaster or political instability, a
local economy that at least produces its essential goods will have a true
comparative advantage.
E. Relocalization takes a different perspective altogether. Instead of working
to keep a system going that has no future, it calls us to develop means of
livelihood that pollute as little as possible and that promote local and
regional stability. Since much of our pollution results from the distances
goods travel, we must shorten distances between production and
consumption as much as we can.
[2] Political Decentralization: Nullification, Secession, etc:
―The need for relocalization of the economy in the wake of peak
oil and climate change is forcing me to re-examine my views. I am
of the belief, however, that should relocalization become a
widespread adaptation strategy or simply be forced upon us, the
locale where one lives in the United States will become of
increasing importance. It is no surprise, then, that
relocalization of economic activity implies relocalization of
governmental power. In fact, a kind of precursor to secession,
nullification, has already appeared in the form of city councils
resolving not to cooperate with federal officials in enforcing
the so-called Patriot Act. It has also manifested itself in
cities and states proceeding with climate change initiatives when
the federal government's official policy was that climate change
was not a problem. [..] Instead, secession, recast as political
decentralization, is a close cousin of economic relocalization -
the increasingly urgent need many of us to feel to create our own
local currencies, grow more of our own food, harvest our own
energy, and the like. [..] What is less apparent to most is the
fact that the U.S. has become an Empire teetering on the edge,
while it continues to enrich the few at the expense of the many.
Nothing less than a complete structural re-tooling of our
financial, commercial and economic life will bring about the
significant kinds of transformations we'll need moving forward.
It is not an appealing thought, that economic relocalization
ultimately will not succeed without political decentralization-
but we believe it is an honest one.‖ - Political Secession and
Economic Relocalisation: Parallel Goals to deal with Climate
Change & Peak Oil5; Vermont Commons
5 http://www.vtcommons.org/blog/political-secession-and-economic-relocalization-are-parallel-goals
Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC 6
[2.1] The New Nullification6 (Resource Insights, 05/06):
A. Recently, 132 mayors across America announced they were going ahead
with policies to fight global warming7 despite the Bush administration's
rejection of such measures. In doing so, they were adding to a series of acts
by states and localities that when taken together add up to a new and
growing nullification movement. Nullification is a long debated theory
that says that states have the right to defy federal law or "nullify" it if
they feel a particular law is unconstitutional. While the mayors were not
exactly defying a federal law, they were openly snubbing an official federal
policy of inaction on greenhouse gas emissions. Their action and many
similar ones are beginning to call into question the ability of the federal
government to impose its will on the individual states and localities.
B. Take the lawsuit by eight states and New York City against utilities8
designed to force the utilities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The suit
was filed because the EPA refused to take action9 to regulate carbon
dioxide emissions, a move that prompted an earlier lawsuit against the
agency. Both suits are direct confrontations with a federal government
which currently wants to do nothing about greenhouse gas emissions.
C. In the area of genetically engineered crops, the Food and Drug
Administration has long held that such crops are virtually identical to
non-biotech crops and therefore require no testing or extraordinary
regulation. But, two counties in California have already banned their
planting10, and a third has a ban on the ballot this year. (Monsanto, the
world's largest producer of genetically engineered crops, is fighting back
by trying to pass state laws that pre-empt local control of biotech crops.11)
D. [..] But, perhaps the best-known acts of nullification are resolutions by
states, cities and counties across the nation that call for refusing
cooperation with federal authorities trying to enforce the so-called USA
Patriot Act. To date some 386 resolutions have been passed12. The list of
cities includes Albuquerque, Atlanta, Austin, Baltimore, Dallas, Des
Moines, Detroit, Los Angeles, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, New York City,
Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Portland (ME), Portland (OR), Providence,
Richmond (VA), St. Louis, St. Paul, San Francisco, Seattle, and
Washington, D. C. itself! States include Alaska, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho,
Maine, Montana, and Vermont.
6 http://resourceinsights.blogspot.com/2005/06/new-nullification.html 7 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1402961/posts 8 http://www.climateark.org/articles/reader.asp?linkid=33783 9 http://www.colorado.edu/Economics/morey/4545/global/7states.html 10 http://www.organicconsumers.org/biod/sonoma010605.cfm 11 http://www.organicconsumers.org/monsanto/laws052005.cfm 12 http://www.bordc.org/list.php
Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC 7
[2.2] Pennsylvania Court Deals Blow to Secrecy-Obsessed Fracking
Industry: Corporations Not The Same As Persons With Privacy Rights13
(Alternet; 11/04/2013);
A. ―The ruling represents the first crack in the judicial armor that has been
so meticulously welded together by major corporations,‖ said Thomas
Linzey, executive director of the Community Environmental Legal
Defense Fund, which has helped 150 communities in eight states adopt
Community Bill of Rights to limit corporate powers. ―It affirms what many
communities already know, that change only occurs when people begin to
openly question and challenge legal doctrines that have been treated as
sacred by most lawyers and judges.‖
B. But where the ruling is likely to make the biggest waves is in the so-called
corporate personhood debate. The Judge spent more than a third of her
32-page decision saying why corporations and business entities were not
the same as people under Pennsylvania‘s constitution, and why, for the
purposes of doing business in the state, that federal court rulings that blur
the rights of people and businesses do not apply.
C. ―This court ruling is a significant development for the growing movement
to restore democracy to the people,‖ said John Bonifaz, the co-founder and
executive director of Free Speech For People, a national campaign
launched on the day of the U.S. Supreme Court‘s decision in Citizens
United v. FEC. ―The ruling is the newest example of dissent within the
judiciary to the fabricated doctrine of corporate constitutional rights. It
will be held up for years to come as a powerful defense of the promise of
American self-government: of, by, and for the people.‖
[2.3] Appeals court upholds local fracking bans in NY14 (Tri-City Herald,
02/05/2013)
A. New York municipalities can use local zoning laws to ban the practice of
hydraulic fracturing to drill for natural gas, a mid-level state appeals
court said Thursday.
B. State mining and drilling law doesn't trump the authority of local
governments to control land use, the four-judge appellate division panel
ruled unanimously.
[2.4] Hardwick, VT: Relocalized Full Employment Agrarian Economy15:
A. The town of Hardwick, Vt., has been celebrated as the scene of a local food
revival. In recent years, lots of small farms have started up nearby. Tom
Stearns, president of a local organic seed company called High Mowing
Seeds, says there are more organic farms per capita within 10 miles of
13 http://www.alternet.org/fracking/pennsylvania-court-deals-blow-secrecy-obsessed-fracking-industry-
corporations-not-same 14 http://www.tri-cityherald.com/2013/05/02/2379781/appeals-court-upholds-local-fracking.html 15 http://www.hardwickagriculture.org/
Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC 8
Hardwick than anywhere else in the world. There's also a thriving local
grocery co-op; a busy farmer's market; even a classy restaurant — Claire's
— where almost anything you eat grew or grazed on land nearby.16 [..]
Hewitt saw what was happening in Hardwick, and it struck him as
unusual, even odd. "Here's this town: Unemployment rate 40 percent
higher than the Vermont state average; median income 25 percent lower;
and then there was this thing happening around so-called sustainable ag
and local food!" Hewitt says. So Hewitt wrote a book about Hardwick:
The Town That Food Saved.
[3] De-Industrialization: The End of National Power Grids:
All citizens must immediately begin preparing for the reality that on 22 April 2015,
TYGAE is calling for all nations to simultaneously turn off their coal, nuclear
powered, etc ‗industrial forms of electricity generation‘. All citizens have two years
to make their relocalisation Prepping plans for de-industrialized local food and
alternative energy production, including pre-industrial forms of transportation.
―Global climate change will pose serious threats to water
supplies and agricultural production, leading to mass migration
in some cases. At the same time we will see an increasing demand
for a dwindling supply of fossil fuels. These factors mean and
intense competition for key and vital resources, around the globe
and that leads to conflict.
―This report is different to many other reports, involving
military leaders. That is because in it, we make a direct appeal
to the American people. We talk in this report about the amazing
sacrifices the American people made during World War II, planting
victory gardens, cutting down on fuel use, saving scrap metal and
old rubber, sacrifices, or maybe just examples of common sense
and prudent lifestyle changes. Whatever you call them, the steps
taken by the American people then, shortened the war and saved
lives.
And I believe the same can be said today about these challenges
of energy security and climate security. There are individual
steps that every American can take. Using less energy. Being more
efficient with the energy that we do use. Supporting new policies
to help our country take a new energy path. These are the steps
that can help us avoid, or shorten wars in the future. Those wars
over competition for vital resources. These are steps that can
save lives. They may cost money yes, but if we don't spend the
money now, we will still pay, and we will pay much more later. In
fact, we'll pay in American lives lost.
American civilians played an important role in World War II
because they understood the stakes and because they were asked to
16 http://www.npr.org/2011/07/15/137499585/vermont-towns-food-focus-still-a-growing-concept
Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC 9
do so. General Wald made the stakes clear, and our report makes
the stakes clear. Our current energy posture poses a significant
and urgent threat to our national security, militarily,
economically and diplomatically.
Hopefully more Americans will understand these stakes, and that
these consequences will affect them. Hopefully more Americans
will hear the very direct request from our Commander in Chief and
from this small group of a dozen retired Admirals and Generals.
The American people, all of us, through our energy choices can
contribute directly to the security of our nation. It is a triple
win. It makes us energy independent. It reduces our effect on the
environment, and it makes our nation very much more secure.‖ –
Vice Admiral Dennis McGinn; Energy, Climate Change, and the
Military: Implications for National Security17; Woodrow Wilson
Center
[4] Primitivism: Ultimate Goal: Voluntary Sustainability for Our
Children and Humanity’s Future Generations:
[4.1] Citizens are advised to (a) Learn primitive skills used prior to industrial
revolution from indigenous cultures still living low/no tech sustainable lifestyles, (b)
replace AnthroCorpocentric Compulsive Developmentism value system with
Gender Balanced Agrarian and Primitivist value system.
―Over the past three decades, snow cover has been reduced by 17-
18% per decade and sea ice is declining fast because of human-
induced global warming. Consequently, the albedo effect is
collapsing in the Arctic. Albedo is the reflection of Sun‘s
radiation off the white ice and white snow surfaces.
Unfortunately, when the albedo effect collapses, the dark sea and
dark land mass absorb most of the Sun‘s radiation. A collapsing
albedo effect is ominously apocalyptic for the Arctic, and for
the world. And, disturbingly, Arctic albedo is already in the
collapsing stage. This will inevitably lead to ever more methane
emissions and a vicious cycle of feedbacks leading to an
extinction event, probably unstoppable.‖ - Arctic Methane
Emergency Group; Methane Outbreak Alert18
Mosuo: Primitive Ecocentric Gender-Balanced Sustainable Agrarian
Culture with no murder, rape, jails, homeless or unemployment:
The socio-political problem solving system of the Gender Balanced agrarian Mosuo
culture in South West China is plausibly the most credible system of jurisprudence
on planet earth. The people of Mosuo have no rape (not even a word in their
language for rape, because it does not exist), no murder, no suicide, no prisons, no
17 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1FMeVH2AgI 18 Dissident Voice, 27/04/2013 http://dissidentvoice.org/2013/04/methane-outbreak-alert/
Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC 10
mental illness, no mental institutions, no unemployment and no homelessness; as a
result of abiding by (a) the laws of nature and tribal control of population and
consumption, and (b) the laws of human nature, in terms of public problem solving,
and a socio-political focus on root cause problem solving.19
In Mosuo culture, women are the head of the house, property is passed through the
female line, and women tend to make the business decisions. Mosuo women carry
on the family name and run the households, which are usually made up of several
families, with one woman elected as the head. The head matriarchs of each village
govern the region by committee. Political power, however, remains in the hands of
males, creating a gender-balanced society. The traditional Mosuo religion worships
nature, is called Daba, with Lugu Lake regarded as the Mother Goddess and the
mountain overlooking it venerated as the Goddess of Love. Their focus is their close
relationship to the land that supports them and with their neighbours, who also
support them.
[5] Media Sustainable Security Fines: Responsibility for Citizens
Ignorance:
[5.1] A majority of industrial civilization‘s problems - crime, violence,
homelessness, unemployment, poverty, inflation, food shortages, political
instability, vanishing species, garbage and pollution urban sprawl, traffic jams,
toxic waste, energy and non-renewable resources (NNR) depletion and scarcity are
symptoms of Ecological Overshoot, resulting from Overpopulation and
Overconsumption..
[5.2] Dr. Michael Maher‘s study: How and Why Journalists avoid the
Population-Environment Connection20: argues that the American public are
largely ignorant about the relationship between Overpopulation and the
Environment, as a result of media censorship of the role of population growth, in
their stories wherein they report on the societal consequences of overpopulation.
But in Tradeoffs: Imperatives of Choice in a High-Tech World,
Wenk (1986) offered a more media-centric view of how the public
learns: "Whatever literacy in science and technology the general
public has reached is not from formal education. Rather, it is
from the mass media. That responsibility of the press has been
almost completely ignored" (p. 162).
This study will examine press responsibility for the public's
indifference to population growth by exploring two questions:
To what extent do press reports about population-driven
environmental problems link those problems to population growth?
19 Tami Blumenfield (May 2009): The Na of Southwest China: Debunking the Myths; Washington Univ
http://web.pdx.edu/~tblu2/Na/myths.pdf 20
http://www.mnforsustain.org/maher_michael_t_how_and_why_journalists_avoid_pop.htm
Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC 11
What reasons do reporters give for ignoring population growth in
stories about environmental problems?
[5.3] Mainstream media publications should consequently be fined $50.00 per
word (of the article‘s length) for every single television, print or online article/report
as of 22 April 2013; which deals with any Ecological Tipping Point/Scarcity issue:
―crime, violence, homelessness, unemployment, poverty, inflation, food shortages,
political instability, vanishing species, garbage and pollution urban sprawl, traffic
jams, toxic waste, energy and non-renewable resources (NNR) depletion and
scarcity‖; where the journalist fails to include the role of over population and
overconsumption, as a direct cause of the Ecological Tipping Points/Scarcity issue
the article was reporting upon.
[5.4] If Journalists and Editors consistently inform the public when reporting
on any Ecological Tipping Point/Scarcity related social problem; that such problems
are a direct consequence of overpopulation and overconsumption; citizen members
and investors of corporations, CEO‘s, managers and Boards, shall find it far easier
to implement Sustainable Security corporate practices.
[5.5] Consequently: Journalists, Editors and Publications which consistently
fail to inform the public about the roles of overpopulation and overconsumption in
their articles about Ecological Tipping Point/Scarcity issues; should be publicly
recognized as Direct Threats to National and Sustainable Security.
[II] Military Coup d'état Implementation
of Sustainable Security Constitutions:
Walking the National Security Walk to Support the Troops:
―A yellow ribbon on a car or truck is a wonderful message of
symbolic support for our troops. I‘d like to see the American
people take it several steps further. If you say a yellow ribbon
is the ‗talk,‘ then being energy efficient is the ‗walk‘. A
yellow ribbon on a big, gas-guzzling SUV is a mixed message. We
need to make better energy choices in our homes, businesses and
transportation, as well as to support our leaders in making
policies that change the way we develop and use energy. If we
Americans truly embrace this idea, it is a triple win: it reduces
our dependence on foreign oil, it reduces our impact on the
climate and it makes our nation much more secure.‖ - Vice Admiral
Dennis V. McGinn, USN (Ret); Former Deputy Chief of Naval
Operations for Warfare Requirements and Programs21
If World citizens fail; -- since such failure demonstrates the malfunction and
ecological collapse consequences of the ‗one person, one vote‘ political system; and
21 http://www.cna.org/reports/energy
Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC 12
requires a new system where only Ecoliterate persons are qualified to vote --
TYGAE call on the Worlds‘ Military to conduct worldwide simultaneous MILINT
Earth Day Coup d'état‘s; to end the ‗One Person, One Vote‘ policy and implement a
‗Sustainable Security Licence to Vote‘ policy; where only Ecoliterate ‗Sustainable
Leaver‘ citizens get the licence to vote.
Sustainable Security Constitution:
―A runaway climate change is now clear and beginning to be
quantified for the first time… the greatest threat we face as a
planet… The rate of change we‘re generating in the current
situation is between 200-300 times faster than that experience of
any extinction event apart from the asteroidal impact. If you
look at the general background change, for instance, it takes
about 10,000 years to change the concentration of carbon dioxide
by 100 ppm — we‘re doing it in 30 years at this year‘s rate… so,
the rate of change in the climate is phenomenal compared to
previous extinction events. We‘re already in a mass extinction
event. We‘re losing species and losing populations, partly by
climate change and partly by habitat change, partly by
overexploitation of habitat like fisheries… We‘ve lost about 40%
of the phytoplankton in the oceans which is the basis of the food
chain.‖ -- David Wasdell, International Coordinator, Meridian
Programme; Arctic Methane – Why the Sea Ice Matters22
[6] Sustainable Security Licence to Vote: Only citizens who have been, and
continue to demonstrate not only their intellectual theoretical Sustainability
consciousness, but who also ‗walk their sustainability talk‘, in terms of maintaining
their procreation and consumption choices, below carrying capacity; i.e. Sustainable
Leavers; should be the only individuals considered worthy of the ‗Sustainable
Security Licence to Vote.‘
[7] All other citizens who were either (a) so eco-illiterate they were not even aware
of the reality of the climate change, energy and resource scarcity national security
risks facing the country, and/or (b) those who were aware of the reality of these
Environmental security risks, but lacked the consciousness and commitment to
implement the required ‗sustainable security‘ procreation and consumption
behaviour in their own lifestyles, or to use their stolen resources to enable a
sustainable security future; should forthwith lose their right to vote, until they
demonstrate their capacity to procreate and consume below carrying capacity. Until
then they shall be considered ‗Unsustainable Scarcity Combatants‘; and denied
voting rights.
[8] How Does a Citizen verify whether they are a Sustainable Leaver?:
[8.1] A Sustainable Leaver / Eco-Innocent is someone who either has:
22 Arctic Methane Emergency Group; Envisionation, Producer: Nick Breeze, Spring 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSsPHytEnJM
Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC 13
A. 0 children, with a consumption footprint < 20 gha (Intn'l Biocapacity (1
gha) x 20);
B. 1 child, with consumption footprint < 1 gha.
[8.2] An Unsustainable Taker / Scarcity-Combatant is someone who has:
A. 0 children, with consumption footprint > 20 gha; or
B. 1 child, consumption footprint > 1 gha; or
C. 2 or more children.
[8.3] For example: The author‘s consumption Footprint23 using Sustainable
Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 12.75 global hectares (gha). South Africa's
average consumption footprint is 38.59 gha. I have no children, consequently my
procreation factor is 0 x 20* = 0. Her Consumption (12.75) x Procreation (0) = Eco
Footprint of 12.75/0 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed like her, we would need
0.81 earths.24 Conversely, if everyone consumed and procreated like President
Jacob Zuma, we would need 2090 earths25.
[9] Sustainable (Leaver) v Unsustainable (Taker):
[9.1] An individuals Sustainable (Leaver) or Unsustainable (Taker) Footprint is
a result of: (A) Consumption Footprint multiplied by (B) Procreation Factor (Every
Child increases EcoFootprint by a factor of 20 - Oregon Univ. Study26)
[10] Consumption Footprint:
[10.1] ―The Ecological Footprint (EF) is a measure of the consumption of
renewable natural resources by a human population. A country‘s EF is the total
area of productive land or sea required to produce all the crops, meat, seafood, wood
and fibre it consumes, to sustain its energy consumption and to give space for its
infrastructure. The EF can be compared with the biologically productive capacity of
the land and sea available to that country‘s population.‖
[10.2] Guerrylla Laws define the Eco/Ego Footprint27 procreation and
consumption behaviour of an individual as a Sustainable Leaver (aka Eco-Innocent)
or Unsustainable Taker (aka Scarcity-Combatant), based upon a sustainable
23 http://myfootprint.org/en/your_results/?id=2559685 24 http://sqworms.weebly.com/lara-johnstone-eco-081.html 25 President Zuma‘s consumption footprint using Sustainable Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 65.66 global
hectares (gha). President Zuma‘s Procreation Factor is 500 [President Zuma has 25 children. His procreation
footprint factor is 25 x 20* = 500. (Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20 )]. President Zuma‘s
Net Consumption & Procreation Footprint is 33280 gha [Consumption (65.66) x Procreation (500) = Net
Footprint of 33280 gha]. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like President Zuma, we would need
2,090 earths. http://sqworms.weebly.com/jacob-zuma-ego-2090.html 26 http://sqswans.weebly.com/child--ecofootprint-x-20.html 27 EcoFootprint: The difference between the biocapacity and Ecological Footprint of a region or country. A
biocapacity deficit occurs when the Footprint of a population exceeds the biocapacity of the area available to
that population. If there is a regional or national biocapacity deficit, it means that the region is importing
biocapacity through trade or liquidating regional ecological assets. Global biocapacity deficit cannot be
compensated through trade, and is overshoot.
Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC 14
consumption bio-capacity of 1 global hectare (gha)28 (60 % of 1.8 gha)29 in
accordance with the proactive conservation policies of Bhutan30; multiplied by an
individuals Breeding footprint factor of 20 per child. [(Each Child increases a
parents footprint by factor of 20)]
[10.3] Taking Your Personal Footprint Quiz:
A. Footprint Network31; or
B. Center for Sustainable Economy32
[11] Procreation Factor:
[11.1] Every Child increases EcoFootprint by a factor of 20 - Oregon Univ.
Study33:
A. The carbon legacy and greenhouse gas impact of an extra child is almost
20 times more important than some of the other environmentally sensitive
practices people might employ their entire lives – things like driving a
high mileage car, recycling, or using energy-efficient appliances and light
bulbs.
[12] International Sustainable Security Peace Treaties:
[12.1] All ‗Peace treaties‘ which do not require both parties to maintain their
nation citizens‘ procreation and consumption practices below carrying capacity, as a
fundamental requirement for the credibility of the peace treaty should be
considered ‗War is Peace‘ Whore treaties, ruled null and void, and renegotiated.
[12.2] Any credible ‗Sustainable Security‘ Peace Treaty, must require all parties
to the Peace Treaty to maintain their nation‘s citizens and corporations procreation,
consumption and production practices below carrying capacity. Any nation which
allows their citizens or corporations to engage in a breeding, consumption or
28 Sustainable Footprint Biocapacity: A biocapacity of 1 gha assumes that 40% of land is set aside for other
species. 1 gha is 60 % of 1.8 gha, therefore .8 hectares is set aside for other species. 29 International Biocapacity: In 2006, the average biologically productive area (biocapacity) per person
worldwide was approximately 1.8 global hectares (gha) per capita. In 2008, there were ~ 12 billion hectares of
biologically productive land and water on Earth. Dividing by the number of people alive in that year (6.7
billion) gives 1.79 global hectares per person. This assumes that no land is set aside for other species that
consume the same biological material as humans. If for example, there were only 3.5 billion people alive that
year, that would have provided everyone with 3.5 gha. If there were only 1 billion people, their would be 12gha
biocapacity for each persons needs. 30 Bhutan Proactive Conservation: Bhutan is seen as a model for proactive conservation initiatives. The
Kingdom has received international acclaim for its commitment to the maintenance of its biodiversity. This is
reflected in the decision to maintain at least sixty percent of the land area under forest cover, to designate more
than 40% of its territory as national parks, reserves and other protected areas, and most recently to identify a
further nine percent of land area as biodiversity corridors linking the protected areas. Environmental
conservation has been placed at the core of the nation's development strategy, the middle path. It is not treated
as a sector but rather as a set of concerns that must be mainstreamed in Bhutan's overall approach to
development planning and to be buttressed by the force of law. - "Parks of Bhutan". Bhutan Trust Fund for
Environmental Conservation online. Bhutan Trust Fund. 31 http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/personal_footprint/ 32 http://www.myfootprint.org/ 33 Paul Murtaugh (7-31-09): Family Planning: A Major Environmental Emphasis, Oregon University
http://oregonstate.edu/ua/ncs/archives/2009/jul/family-planning-major-environmental-emphasis
Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC 15
production war, shall be considered to have declared war with all other Sustainable
Security nations.
[III] Failure of Citizens and Military to Act: Runaway
Feedback Confluence of Tipping Points to Extinction:
―If we don't take action now, every day, every year that goes by,
the options for dealing with the effects of climate change and
the effects of energy security become much much more expensive,
and in fact some of the options completely dissapear over the
next ten to twenty years; if we don't start taking some prudent
actions now.‖ – Vice Admiral Dennis McGinnis; Climate Patriots: A
Military Perspective on Energy, Climate Change and National
Security34
If Military Officials fail to enact Sustainable Security Constitutions, by worldwide
simultaneous temporary Coup d'état measures in 2015; it shall certainly result in
the extermination of humanity, by 2100, if not sooner, due to the runaway feedback
confluence of overpopulation, overconsumption, resource scarcity induced conflict
and climate change tipping points.
―Even if all man-made greenhouse gas emissions were stopped
tomorrow and carbon-dioxide levels stabilized at today's
concentration, by the end of this century the global average
temperature would increase by about 4.3 degrees Fahrenheit, or
about 2.4 degrees centigrade above pre-industrial levels, which
is significantly above the level which scientists and
policymakers agree is a threshold for dangerous climate change.
Of course, greenhouse gas emissions will not stop tomorrow, so
the actual temperature increase will likely be significantly
larger, resulting in potentially catastrophic impacts to society
unless other steps are taken to reduce the Earth's temperature.‖
Charles Greene, A Very Inconvenient Truth35
Failure of citizens, and/or Military to act now, while they still can; shall aggravate
the runaway feedback confluence, rendering it impossible and futile to act later.
The Arctic situation is snowballing: dangerous changes in the
Arctic derived from accumulated anthropogenic green house gases
lead to more activities conducive to further greenhouse gas
emissions. This situation has the momentum of a run-away train. I
felt there was little hope that any one nation would take the
first step to abandon the greed track. However, a reaction has
come, unexpectedly, from the smallest, but perhaps most affected,
player.
34 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjS9pU0y_JU 35 Charles H. Greene, D. James Baker, and Daniel H. Miller (March 2010): A Very Inconvenient Truth;
Oceanography, Vol.23, No.1 http://www.tos.org/oceanography/archive/23-1_greene.pdf
Drafted 22 April 2013. Briefing Paper navyjag-humint.co.nr WH Petition: http://wh.gov/zjyC 16
In an election on March 12 2013, Greenlanders elected Aleqa
Hammond, from the social-democratic party, as their new leader.
Her program places human rights and environmental conservation,
the underpinning of their traditional livelihoods as hunters and
fishers, above the financial benefits of the resource rush. She
has committed to remove the law that opened the door to the
mining boom. The new government have opted to stop the charging
juggernaut that other nations seem unable — or unwilling — to
contain.
The Greenlandic inüit are few and humble, but have given a lesson
to the most powerful nations. Other nations with wealthier
citizens should take note and ask themselves if they too would
have the courage to walk away from the promises of wealth that
fuels the run-away train of climate change.
- Final Frontiers: The Artic36 (Conversation; 04/04/2013)
Briefing Paper: Ind. Civilization Suicide March: Navyjag-humint.co.nr
White House Petition: Avoid a Coup d'etat, implement Sustainable Security
Relocalization, De-Industrialization & Primitivization. http://wh.gov/zjyC
36 http://theconversation.com/final-frontiers-the-arctic-12911