15-wis5 ndt 2006

Upload: -

Post on 14-Apr-2018

231 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    1/56

    CSWIP 3.1 Welding Inspection

    TWI Training & ExaminationTWI Training & ExaminationServicesServices

    NonNon--Destructive TestingDestructive Testing

    Course Reference WIS 5Course Reference WIS 5

    Course notes section reference 15Course notes section reference 15

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    2/56

    Non-Destructive Testing

    A welding inspector should have a working knowledge of NDTmethods and their applications, advantages and disadvantages.

    Four basic NDT methodsFour basic NDT methods Magnetic particle inspection (MT)

    Dye penetrant inspection (PT)

    Radiographic inspection (RT)

    Ultrasonic inspection (UT)

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    3/56

    Non-Destructive Testing

    Surface Crack DetectionSurface Crack Detection

    Liquid Penetrant (PT or Dye-Penetrant)

    Magnetic Particle Inspection (MT or MPI)

    Volumetric InspectionVolumetric Inspection

    Ultrasonics (UT)

    Radiography (RT)

    Each technique has advantages & disadvantages with respectEach technique has advantages & disadvantages with respect

    to:to:

    Technical Capability and CostTechnical Capability and Cost

    Note:Note: The choice of NDT techniques is based on consideration ofThe choice of NDT techniques is based on consideration of

    these advantages and disadvantagesthese advantages and disadvantages

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    4/56

    Penetrant Testing (PT)Penetrant Testing (PT)

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    5/56

    Penetrant Testing

    Main features:Main features:

    Detection of surface breaking defects only.

    This test method uses the forces of capillary action

    Applicable on any material type, as long they are non porous.

    Penetrants are available in many different types:

    Water washable contrast

    Solvent removable contrast

    Water washable fluorescent

    Solvent removable fluorescent

    Post-emulsifiable fluorescent

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    6/56

    Step 1. PreStep 1. Pre--CleaningCleaning

    Ensure surface is very Clean normally with the use of a solvent

    Penetrant Testing

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    7/56

    Step 2. ApplyStep 2. Apply penetrantpenetrant

    After the application, the penetrant is normally left on the

    components surface for approximately 15-20 minutes (dwell time).The penetrant enters any defects that may be present by capillaryaction.

    Penetrant Testing

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    8/56

    Step 3. Clean offStep 3. Clean off penetrantpenetrant

    the penetrant is removed after sufficient penetration time (dwell

    time).Care must be taken not to wash any penetrant out off any defectspresent

    Penetrant Testing

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    9/56

    Step 3. Apply developerStep 3. Apply developer

    After the penetrant has be cleaned sufficiently, a thin layer of

    developer is applied.The developer acts as a contrast against the penetrant and allowsfor reverse capillary action to take place.

    Penetrant Testing

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    10/56

    Step 4. Inspection / development timeStep 4. Inspection / development time

    Inspection should take place immediately after the developer has

    been applied.any defects present will show as a bleed out during developmenttime.After full inspection has been carried out post cleaning is generallyrequired.

    Penetrant Testing

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    11/56

    ColourColour contrastcontrast PenetrantPenetrant

    FluorescentFluorescent PenetrantPenetrant Bleed out viewedBleed out viewedunder a UVunder a UV--A lightA light

    sourcesource

    Bleed out viewedBleed out viewedunder white lightunder white light

    Penetrant Testing

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    12/56

    Penetrant Testing

    AdvantagesAdvantages

    Simple to use

    Inexpensive

    Quick results

    Can be used on any non-

    porous material Portability

    Low operator skill required

    DisadvantagesDisadvantages

    Surface breaking defect only

    little indication of depths

    Penetrant may contaminatecomponent

    Surface preparation critical

    Post cleaning required Potentially hazardous

    chemicals

    Can not test unlimited times

    Temperature dependant

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    13/56

    Penetrant Testing

    Comparison with Magnetic Particle InspectionComparison with Magnetic Particle Inspection

    ADVANTAGESADVANTAGES

    easy to interpret results

    no power requirements

    relatively little training required

    can use on all materials

    DISADVANTAGESDISADVANTAGES

    good surface finish needed

    relatively slow

    chemicals - health & safety issue

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    14/56

    Any QuestionsAny Questions

    Penetrant Testing

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    15/56

    Magnetic Particle testing (MT)Magnetic Particle testing (MT)

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    16/56

    Magnetic Particle Testing

    Main features:Main features:

    Surface and slight sub-surface detection

    Relies on magnetization of component being tested

    Only Ferro-magnetic materials can be tested

    A magnetic field is introduced into a specimen being tested

    Methods of applying a magnetic field, yoke, permanent magnet,

    prods and flexible cables. Fine particles of iron powder are applied to the test area

    Any defect which interrupts the magnetic field, will create aleakage field, which attracts the particles

    Any defect will show up as either a dark indication or in thecase of fluorescent particles under UV-A light a green/yellowindication

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    17/56

    A crack likeA crack like

    indicationindication

    Magnetic Particle Testing

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    18/56

    Alternatively to contrast inks, fluorescent inks may be used forAlternatively to contrast inks, fluorescent inks may be used for

    greater sensitivity. These inks require a UVgreater sensitivity. These inks require a UV--A light source and aA light source and a

    darkened viewing area to inspect the componentdarkened viewing area to inspect the component

    Magnetic Particle Testing

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    19/56

    Typical sequence of operations to inspect a weldTypical sequence of operations to inspect a weld

    Clean area to be tested

    Apply contrast paint

    Apply magnetisism to the component

    Apply ferro-magnetic ink to the component during magnatising

    Iterpret the test area

    Post clean and de-magnatise if required

    Magnetic Particle Testing

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    20/56

    AdvantagesAdvantages

    Simple to use

    Inexpensive

    Rapid results

    Little surface preparation

    required

    Possible to inspect throughthin coatings

    DisadvantagesDisadvantages

    Surface or slight sub-surfacedetection only

    Magnetic materials only

    No indication of defects depths

    Only suitable for linear defects Detection is required in two

    directions

    Magnetic Particle Testing

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    21/56

    Magnetic Particle Testing

    Comparison with Penetrant TestingComparison with Penetrant Testing

    ADVANTAGESADVANTAGES

    much quicker than PT instant results

    can detect near-surface imperfections (by current flow technique)

    less surface preparation needed

    DISADVANTAGESDISADVANTAGES

    only suitable for ferromagnetic materials

    electrical power for most techniques

    may need to de-magnetise (machine components)

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    22/56

    Any QuestionsAny Questions

    Magnetic Particle Testing

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    23/56

    Ultrasonic Testing (UT)Ultrasonic Testing (UT)

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    24/56

    Main Features:Main Features:

    Surface and subSurface and sub--surface detectionsurface detection

    This detection method uses high frequency sound waves,This detection method uses high frequency sound waves,typically above 2MHz to pass through a materialtypically above 2MHz to pass through a material

    A probe is used which contains aA probe is used which contains a piezopiezo electric crystal toelectric crystal to

    transmit and receive ultrasonic pulses and display thetransmit and receive ultrasonic pulses and display the

    signals on a cathode ray tube or digital displaysignals on a cathode ray tube or digital display The actual display relates to the time taken for theThe actual display relates to the time taken for the

    ultrasonic pulses to travel the distance to the interface andultrasonic pulses to travel the distance to the interface and

    backback

    An interface could be the back of a plate material or a defectAn interface could be the back of a plate material or a defect

    For ultrasound to enter a material a couplant must beFor ultrasound to enter a material a couplant must be

    introduced between the probe and specimenintroduced between the probe and specimen

    Ultrasonic Testing

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    25/56

    DigitalDigital

    UT Set,UT Set,Pulse echoPulse echo

    signalssignals

    A scanA scanDisplayDisplay

    Compression probeCompression probe checking the materialchecking the material ThicknessThickness

    Ultrasonic Testing

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    26/56

    defectdefect

    00 1010 2020 3030 4040 5050

    defectdefect

    echoechoBack wallBack wall

    echoecho

    CRT DisplayCRT DisplayCompression ProbeCompression Probe

    MaterialMaterial ThkThk

    initial pulseinitial pulse

    Ultrasonic Testing

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    27/56

    Angle ProbeAngle Probe

    UT SetUT SetA ScanA Scan

    DisplayDisplay

    Ultrasonic Testing

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    28/56

    initial pulse

    defect echo

    defectdefect

    defect

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    CRT Display

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    initial pulse

    defect echo

    CRT Display

    Skip

    Full Skip

    Ultrasonic Testing

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    29/56

    AdvantagesAdvantages

    Rapid results

    Both surface and

    sub-surface detection

    Safe

    Capable of measuring thedepth of defects

    May be battery powered

    Portable

    DisadvantagesDisadvantages

    Trained and skilled operatorrequired

    Requires high operator skill

    Good surface finish required

    Defect identification

    Couplant may contaminate

    No permanent record

    Calibration Required

    Ferritic Material (Mostly)

    Ultrasonic Testing

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    30/56

    Ultrasonic Testing

    Comparison with RadiographyComparison with Radiography

    ADVANTAGESADVANTAGES

    good for planar defects

    good for thick sections

    instant results

    can use on complex joints

    can automate

    very portable

    no safety problems (parallel working is possible)

    low capital & running costs

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    31/56

    Ultrasonic Testing

    Comparison with Radiography

    DISADVANTAGESDISADVANTAGES

    no permanent record (with standard equipment) not suitable for very thin joints

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    32/56

    Any QuestionsAny Questions

    Ultrasonic Testing

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    33/56

    Radiographic Testing (RT)Radiographic Testing (RT)

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    34/56

    The principles of radiographyThe principles of radiography

    X or Gamma radiation is imposed upon a test object

    Radiation is transmitted to varying degrees dependant upon thedensity of the material through which it is travelling

    Thinner areas and materials of a less density show as darkerareas on the radiograph

    Thicker areas and materials of a greater density show as lighterareas on a radiograph

    Applicable to metals,non-metals and composites

    Radiographic Testing

    R di hi T i

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    35/56

    X Rays

    Electrically generated

    Gamma Rays

    Generated by the decay ofunstable atoms

    Radiographic Testing

    R di hi T ti

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    36/56

    SourceSource

    Radiation beamRadiation beam Image quality indicatorImage quality indicator

    10fe16

    10fe16

    Test specimenTest specimenRadiographic filmRadiographic film

    Radiographic Testing

    R di hi T ti

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    37/56

    SourceSource

    Radiation beamRadiation beam Image quality indicatorImage quality indicator

    Radiographic film with latent image after exposureRadiographic film with latent image after exposure

    10fe16

    10fe16

    Test specimenTest specimen

    10fe16

    10fe16

    Radiographic Testing

    R di hi T ti

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    38/56

    Radiographic Testing

    DensityDensity -- relates to the degree of darknessrelates to the degree of darkness

    ContrastContrast -- relates to the degree of differencerelates to the degree of difference

    DefinitionDefinition -- relates to the degree of sharpnessrelates to the degree of sharpness

    SensitivitySensitivity -- relates to the overall quality of the radiographrelates to the overall quality of the radiograph

    Densitometer

    Radiographic Sensitivity

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    39/56

    7FE127FE12

    Step / Hole type IQIStep / Hole type IQI Wire type IQIWire type IQI

    Radiographic Sensitivity

    Radiographic Sensitivity

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    40/56

    Wire Type IQIWire Type IQI

    Step/Hole Type IQIStep/Hole Type IQI

    Radiographic Sensitivity

    Radiographic Techniques

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    41/56

    Single Wall Single Image (SWSI)

    film inside, source outside

    Single Wall Single Image (SWSI) panoramic

    film outside, source inside (internal exposure)

    Double Wall Single Image (DWSI)

    film outside, source outside (external exposure)

    Double Wall Double Image (DWDI)

    film outside, source outside (elliptical exposure)

    Radiographic Techniques

    Single Wall Single Image (SWSI)

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    42/56

    IQIIQIss should be placed source sideshould be placed source side

    FilmFilm

    FilmFilm

    Single Wall Single Image (SWSI)

    Single Wall Single Image Panoramic

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    43/56

    IQIIQIss are placed on the film sideare placed on the film side

    Source inside film outside (single exposure)Source inside film outside (single exposure)

    FilmFilm

    Single Wall Single Image Panoramic

    Double Wall Single Image (DWSI)

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    44/56

    IQIIQIss are placed on the film sideare placed on the film side

    Source outside film outside (multiple exposure)Source outside film outside (multiple exposure)

    This technique is intended for pipe diameters over 100mmThis technique is intended for pipe diameters over 100mm

    FilmFilm

    Double Wall Single Image (DWSI)

    Double Wall Single Image (DWSI)

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    45/56

    RadiographRadiograph

    IdentificationIdentification

    IDIDMR11MR11

    Unique identificationUnique identificationEN W10EN W10

    IQI placingIQI placing

    AA BB Pitch marks indicatingPitch marks indicatingreadable film lengthreadable film length

    Double Wall Single Image (DWSI)

    Double Wall Single Image (DWSI)

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    46/56

    RadiographRadiograph

    Double Wall Single Image (DWSI)

    Double Wall Double Image (DWDI)

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    47/56

    FilmFilm IQIIQIss are placed on the source or film sideare placed on the source or film side

    Source outside film outside (multiple exposure)Source outside film outside (multiple exposure)

    A minimum of two exposuresA minimum of two exposures

    This technique is intended for pipe diameters less than 100mmThis technique is intended for pipe diameters less than 100mm

    Double Wall Double Image (DWDI)

    Double Wall Double Image (DWDI)

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    48/56

    Shot A RadiographShot A Radiograph

    IdentificationIdentification

    IDMR12

    Unique identificationUnique identification EN W10

    IQI placingIQI placing

    1 2 Pitch marks indicatingPitch marks indicating

    readable film lengthreadable film length

    4 3

    Double Wall Double Image (DWDI)

    Double Wall Double Image (DWDI)

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    49/56

    Elliptical RadiographElliptical Radiograph

    11 22

    44 33

    Double Wall Double Image (DWDI)

    Radiography

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    50/56

    Radiography

    PENETRATING POWERPENETRATING POWER

    Question:Question:

    What determines the penetrating power of an XWhat determines the penetrating power of an X--ray ?ray ?

    the kilothe kilo--voltage appliedvoltage applied (between anode & cathode)(between anode & cathode)

    Question:Question:

    What determines the penetrating power ofWhat determines the penetrating power of a gamma ray ?a gamma ray ?

    the type of isotopethe type of isotope (the wavelength of the gamma rays)(the wavelength of the gamma rays)

    Radiography

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    51/56

    Radiography

    GAMMA SOURCESGAMMA SOURCES

    IsotopeIsotope Typical Thickness RangeTypical Thickness Range

    Iridium 192Iridium 192 10 to 50 mm10 to 50 mm (mostly used)(mostly used)

    Cobalt 60Cobalt 60 > 50 mm> 50 mm

    YtterbiumYtterbium < 10 mm< 10 mm

    ThuliumThulium < 10 mm< 10 mm

    CaesiumCaesium < 10 mm< 10 mm

    Radiographic Testing

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    52/56

    AdvantagesAdvantages

    Permanent record

    Little surface preparation

    Defect identification

    No material type limitation

    Not so reliant upon operatorskill

    Thin materials

    DisadvantagesDisadvantages

    Expensive consumables

    Bulky equipment

    Harmful radiation

    Defect require significant

    depth in relation to theradiation beam (not good forplanar defects)

    Slow results

    Very little indication of depths

    Access to both sides required

    g p g

    Radiographic Testing

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    53/56

    Radiographic Testing

    Comparison with Ultrasonic ExaminationComparison with Ultrasonic Examination

    ADVANTAGESADVANTAGES

    good for non-planar defects

    good for thin sections

    gives permanent record

    easier for 2nd party interpretation

    can use on all material types

    high productivity

    direct image of imperfections

    Radiographic Testing

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    54/56

    g p g

    Comparison with Ultrasonic Examination

    DISADVANTAGESDISADVANTAGES

    health & safety hazard

    not good for thick sections

    high capital and relatively high running costs

    not good for planar defects

    X-ray sets not very portable

    requires access to both sides of weld

    frequent replacement of gamma source needed (half life)

    Radiographic Testing

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    55/56

    Any QuestionsAny Questions

    Questions

  • 7/30/2019 15-WIS5 NDT 2006

    56/56

    QU 1.QU 1. Name four NDT methods

    QU 2.QU 2. State the two radiation types used in industrial radiographyand state advantages of each.

    QU 3.QU 3. Give the advantages and disadvantages of radiography andconventional ultrasonic inspection.

    QU 5QU 5 State the main limitations of dye penetrant inspection.

    QU 4.QU 4. Give the main disadvantages of magnetic particleinspection and give at least three methods to magnetise acomponent.

    NonNon--Destructive TestingDestructive Testing