Microsoft Word - 001.doc





A A A A Study Study Study Study on on on on the the the the Effect Effect Effect Effect of of of of Bioenergy Bioenergy Bioenergy Bioenergy Field Field Field Field Activation Activation Activation Activation
by by by by Conscious Conscious Conscious Conscious ObservationObservationObservationObservation
2008200820082008 02020202



....
2007200720072007 10101010





2007200720072007 11111111
ABSTRACT···············································································································1
1. ··········································································11
2. ······························································································14
3. ··································································································22
. ····································································································26
3. ····································································································26
4. ····································································································29
5. ····································································································30
6. ····························································································30
2. ····································································································34
1. ··············································································································41
2. ··············································································································42
< 1> ··········································································15
< 2> () ··················································17
< 3> ········································································28
< 4> ····························································29
< 5> ··················32
< 6> ······················33
< 7> ················34
< 8>
2-way repeated ANOVA ····································35
< 9>
································································································35
< 1> ······································································16
< 2> 7 7 ··········································18
< 3> ········································19
< 4> PIP GDV ········································20
< 5> ······································································23
< 6> ····································36
- 1 -
ABSTRACTABSTRACTABSTRACTABSTRACT
A A A A Study Study Study Study on on on on the the the the Effect Effect Effect Effect of of of of Bioenergy Bioenergy Bioenergy Bioenergy Field Field Field Field Activation Activation Activation Activation
by by by by Conscious Conscious Conscious Conscious ObservationObservationObservationObservation
Park, Cheolsoo
Department of Alternative Medicine
Graduate School of Health, Chosun University
According to the observer effect in quantum mechanics, the electron is
shown either as particle or as wave depending on observer's intent. The
particle, which is mutually separated, is connected to one each other by
non-locality in quantum state exceeding time and space. The vacuum in the
universe is not empty, and is filled with numerous elementary particles,
which appear and disappear within the zero point field. The human bioenergy
field, which is surrounded by the multidimensional energy field beyond the
physical body, has an effect on health and well-being of the physical body.
A human being is connected with the zero point field through the bioenergy
field, and the consciousness in each is being well reflected literally by
the bioenergy field.
This study was attempted for the purpose of promoting life energy by
proportionally activating the bioenergy field, with expecting that the
conscious observation will have an effect as a method of revitalizing the
bioenergy field. This study aims to verify whether the conscious observation
is effective as an internal factor that activates the bioenergy field.
Whether the bioenergy field is activated through the conscious observation
was measured by using O-Ring test. And it was experimented whether the
degree of activation in the bioenergy field is getting increased when
repeatedly executing the conscious observation.
- 2 -
The experiment targeted 77 female students who are in university, and was
progressed from Sept. 4 to Sept. 22 in 2007. Aiming to measure the degree of
activation in the bioenergy field 0.6~5cm up on the surface of the human
body, the experimental group measured the degree of activation in the
bioenergy field by measuring from No.2 chakra to No.7 chakra, which are the
center of energy and by adding up scores. It measured while observing how
much No. 2~7 chakras were revitalized by concentrating consciousness with
closing the eyes, and repeated up 4 times while taking a rest for 10
minutes. The control group progressed just O-Ring test by repeating up 4
times equally with the experimental group without any treatment.
The collected data was used by SPSS 12.0, and was calculated average,
standard deviation and percentage for general characteristics and disease
characteristics in the research subjects. The similarity verification on
each variable in the experimental group and the control group was analyzed
with t-test and χ2-test. The verification on the effects of conscious
observation on the bioenergy field was analyzed with the repeated measure
ANOVA.
The following are the results that experimented the effects of conscious
observation on the bioenergy field. First, the degree of activation in the
bioenergy field for the experimental group, which executed the conscious
observation, was indicated to be higher, but there was no statistically
significant difference. Second, given having repeated conscious observation,
the degree of activation in the bioenergy field increased considerably. As a
result of this experiment, repeating the conscious observation leads to
being conducive to activation of the bioenergy field. And the repeated
observation in twice was more important than repeatedly observing several
times.
- 3 -
(quantum mechanics), (soliton),
(entanglement), (nonlocality), (action at a distance)
.
(paradox) .

.


(James Oschman, 2007).
,
.
-
.
(, complementarity) (,
nonlocality) - (collapse)
()
.
-

(, 2004).
(quantum biology)
, , , , ,
, .
(hologram)
.
- 4 -
(zero point field) (polarized)

.
,

. ()
() (, 2005).
() () (), ()
()
() () .
, ,
, , (, 1997).
,

.
, , , ,
(prana)
(, 2005).
()

.
(energy medicine)
(James
Oschman, 2007).
(life field)
.

- 5 -
(field)
( , 1998;
Barbara Ann Brennan, 2000).
(subtle energy)

( , 2007).
(acupuncture),
(aromatherapy), (flower essence),
(craniosacral therapy), (therapeutic touch), (massage),
(homeopathy), (reiki), (radionics), (rolfing)
(James Oschman, 2007).

.
,
.
(,
2001).
.
.
.

.

(field) .


. (system) ,
.
- 6 -
(Dean Radin, 1999).

.


.


.
()
.

.

.
(Barbara Ann Brennan, 2000).
.
, , ,
,
. ,
.
.
.
. -

, ,
.
.
(observer effect) (
, 2005).
.


.
,
. (chakra)

- 8 -
.
(Barbara Ann Brennan, 2000).
.
, (subtle energy)
.

(sensor)
. (L-rod), ,
(pendulum),(Aura meter), (O-Ring Test), (applied
kinesiology), (Thermograph), (Kirlian), LFT, MRA, QRS,
BRS, MRI, MRT, MERIDIAN . GDV, PIP(Polycontrast Interference
photography) (,
2002; , 2007; , 2005).
.
- 9 -


.
.
.
.
.

.
1 :
.
2 :
.

.

.
(energy field)
.
(aura), (Life field), (bioelectromagnetic field),
(Human Energy field), (morphogenetic field)
.
- 11 -
. . . .
1. (observer effect)

.
,
,
. ,
. -
.


. (Copenhagen
interpretation) , , , , ,
,

.
() . , , ,
, ,
.


.
(, 2005). (Roger Penrose, 1996)
(microtubule)
.
.

- 12 -

.
(Everett) (parallel universe)
.


.
.
.
.

(, 2005).
.
(superquantum field)
,
.
(hidden variable)
(, 2001).
(, complementarity)
(, non-locality).
.

.

. (field) .
(NIST) (Christopher Monroe)
(Be)
. ,
.

- 13 -
. (A. J. Leggett)
(SQUID)

(Amit Goswami, 1995).


.

(, 2005).

(reality)
.
.

(Amit Goswami, 1995).


.
- 14 -
(
) . .
() 5 (pancha kosa),
(annamaya kosa), (pranamaya kosa),
(manomaya kosa), (vijnanamaya kosa),
(anandamaya kosa) .
(prana, ) 5 (prana
vayu), (apana vayu), (samana vayu), (udana vayu),
(vyana vayu) (pancha prana) .
72,000 (nadi,) . (ida,
) (pingala, )

(sushumna) . (chakra)
.
‘’
. (sukshma prana)
.
.
7 . 7
,
, (yantra, ), (mantra, ), 5
, ,
.
< 1> < 1> .
- 15 -





,
,

()

.
1 () 2
3
4
5 6 ,
7 (
) .
4
(, 2005).
() , 4

(etheric body), (astral body), (mental body),
- 17 -
(Causal body) (, 2005).
(Barbara Ann Brennan, 2000)
(aura) , , , , ,
7 . <
2> < 2> .
< 2> ()
()


,
,,,

/,
/

,,
,
/,
,
/
,,

,
/
,
/
,,,

/
/
,
/

/

- 18 -
< 2> 7 7

.
(nadi)
, ,
< 3> .
- 19 -
< 3>
, , ,

,

. 1939
(Semyon D. Kirlian)
.
GDV(Biological
Emission & Optical Radiation Stimulated by EM Field Amplified by Gaseous
Discharge with Visualization by Computer Processing),
(bio-photon)
PIP(Polycontrast Interference Photography)
- 20 -
. < 4>
. MRA(Magnetic Resonance
Analyzer), LFT(Life Field Tester), MIRS(Mangnetic Inspired Resonance
Spectrometer), QRS(Quantum Resonance Spectrometer), Quantum FAFA
(, 2005).

( , 1998).
< 4> PIP GDV

(sensor)
.
(L-rod), , (pendulum),
(applied kinesiology), (O-ring test) (, 2002).

. 1930 (Harold
Saxton Burr)
,

. (life field)
.
- 21 -
(Chiang Kanzhen)
DNA ,
.
500 480
, 25% 80%
70% 90%
.
.

.
()
. () (field)

(, 2001). (Lupert Sheldrake)

(morphogenetic field) (Barbara Ann Brennan,
2000).
- 22 -
3. (O-Ring test)
()
, () .


. ()
(,
1999).
1971 (George Goodheart)

.

.
1970 (John Diamond) (applied
kinesiology) (behavioral kinesiology)

. , ,
, , , ,
.
, ,

.

(David Hawkins)

(, 1998).
1970 (, 1995)
(applied kinesiology)
.
- 23 -
(sensor, )
, ( 1)
( O )
. < 5>

.

.

.
(1997, 1998)

- 24 -
.


.


. ,
, ,
, , TV,
,
, ,
,
, ,
(, 1998).
.
.
.
. .
.
“, , ”
.
.
.
. 100 90 .

.

, ,
- 25 -
, , ,
(, 1999).

.
,

.
.
.
- 26 -
1.
(quasi-experimental design), (repeated
treatment design) .
2.
2007 9 4 9 22 G S
.
.
.
.
.
2007 9 4 9 22
40,
37 77 .
3.

. ,
(cm), (kg),
. ,
- 27 -
, 1
. ( , 2006)
, , , , , , , ,
, , , , ,
.
1
. 1
.
- .
- 20cm .
- , , ,
.
- .
- “
, , ” .
- .
(3)
3> .
- 28 -
4 . 5 .
5 1- 2 ,
3 .
6 1- 2 3 , 4
.
7 1- 2, 3, 4 , 5
.
(4)

. 1
2 1 2
4 1 2 .
1 3, 1 4, 1 5
1 2 4
( ,
1995).
(5)
(Barbara Ann Brennan, 2000)
(etheric body)
0.6~5cm 15~20
. (matrix, )
- 29 -
.
.

15cm .
0.6~5cm
< 4> .
< 4>
( )
2 ()


2 7
10 . 2
7 1 .
2 7 2
. 10 4
.


2 7
10 . 1
- 30 -
2 7 1
.

.
10 1 4
10 .
< 2> .
5.
SPSS 12.0KO for windows .
. , ,
.
. t-test χ 2 -test
.
measure ANOVA) .
6.
G S
.
.
.
.
.
- 31 -
. , ,
, .
.

.
. . . .

.
40, 37 77.
20.08(± 2.60) 161.63(±
5.36) 53.33(± 8.02), 40(51.9%)
0(0%).
20.76(± 3.56)
161.49(± 4.25) 52.30(± 6.64),
35(45.5%) 2(2.6%).
< 5>
.
(n=40) (n=37)
t p n n
40 20.08 2.60 37 20.76 3.56 .965 .338
40 161.63 5.36 37 161.49 4.25 -.125 .901
40 53.33 8.02 37 52.30 6.64 -.610 .544
n (%) n (%) χ 2
p


0(0%) 2(2.6%)

- 33 -
(p>.05) .
.
5(6.5%)
35(45.5%).
1(1.3%) 39(50.6%). 1
21(27.3%) 19(24.7%)
. 4(5.2%)
36(46.8%).
3(3.9%)
34(44.2%).
0(0%) 37(48.1%). 1
15(19.5%) 22(28.6%)
. 1(1.3%)
36(46.8%).
< 6>
.
n (%) n (%) χ 2
p
5(6.5%) 3(3.9%)
1

21(27.3%) 15(19.5%)
4(5.2%) 1(1.3%)
- 34 -

(p>.05) .
2.
4 ,
1 19.73( 3.83)
, 2 22.45
( 4.12) 1 , 3
22.18( 3.30) 2 ,
4 22.67(
3.56) 3 .
, 2 20.57( 4.02) 1
, 3 20.57(
4.26) 2 , 4
20.84( 4.75) 3 .
< 7> .
< 7>
(n=77)
1 2 3 4
p=.000 . ,
. F=2.381, p=.082

.
< 8> .
< 8>
2-way repeated ANOVA
216.816 2.5 86.722 13.825 .000*
* 37.336 2.5 14.933 2.381 .082
36.491 3.080 .083
*p<.05

, 1 2
(F=29.286, p=.000) 2 3 , 3 4
. 1 2
(F=5.998, p=.017) 2 3, 3 4
.
1 2 3 4
. < 9>
.
- S.S df M.S F p

1 2 270.584 1 270.584 29.286 .000*
2 3 1.454 1 1.454 .177 .675
3 4 11.404 1 11.404 1.741 .191

*
1 2 55.416 1 55.416 5.998 .017*
2 3 1.454 1 1.454 .177 .675
3 4 1.014 1 1.014 .155 .695
*p<.05
< 6>
.
- 37 -


1 .

2 .
- 38 -

.

. ,
.
(field of consciousness) (Dean Radin, 1999).


.
.
.
()
(, decoherence)

(, 2005).
,
() ( , 2004).
(Dean Radin, 1999)
(field) ()
.
(system)
.
(2005)
,

.


- 39 -

.
. (meditation)
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
‘ ’
.
,
.
.



.
.
.

.

(, 2005).
(, 1997).

3 .
- 40 -
4

.
2 2

.
2
.
,
, , .
, , , .
5 (Pancha
kosa) (Asana), (Pranayama), (Suddhi Kriya),
(Dharana), (Dhyana) (, 2005).
Quantum FAFA

(, 2005).
(), (), (),
(therapeutic touch), (acupuncture), (massage),
(craniosacral therapy), (imagination)


.


.
- 41 -
. . . .
1.


, ,
,
.
G S ,

(quasi-experimental design), (repeated treatment design)
. 2007 9 4 9 22
, 40,
37 77
. 0.6~5cm
2 7
. 2~7
10
4 . 4
.
SPSS 12.0KO for windows
, , ,
t-test χ2-test .
(repeated measure
ANOVA) .
,
.

.
- 42 -

. ,
2 3 4
.


,
1
.
,
2 .


.

.

.

.
.

.
.
.
.
.
- 43 -

(Dean Radin): , , ,
, 1999, p280~284.
(Lynne Mctaggart): , , , , 2004,
p169~175.
, 2000, p42~272.
(Barbara Ann Brennan): (), , ,
, 2000, p551-582.
: - 2, , , 2005, p51~394.
: , , , 2005, p264~273.
(): , , ,
, 1995, p16~89.
, : , , ,
2006, p265~268.
and Human Performance, , , , 2007, pviiii~154.
Amit Goswami: “The Self-aware Universe”, NY, Jeremy P.Tarcher/Putnam,
1995, p109~112.
- 44 -
Roger Penrose: “Shadows of the Mind”, NY, Oxford university Press, 1996,
p358~376.
p17~30.
: “ ”, , 1
, p77~85, 1998.
, : “21C ”,
, 26, p138~143, 2007.
: “ ”, , 8
2, p3~4, 1997.
p92~101, 1998.
21, p149~158, 2004.
17, p22, 2002.
, , , , , , : “BRS
- 45 -
”, , 2, p51~55
1998.
: “ ”, , 15
, p206, 2001.
: “
”, 3, p1~9, 1999.
- 46 -
<1>
?


.
,
.
.
2007 09


- 47 -
< 2>

?
1 ?

2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

871 211-402
Email : umcnet@hanmail.net

() A Study on the Effect of Bioenergy Field Activation
by Conscious Observation

.
1. DB
, , .
2. .
, .
3. , , , .
4. 5 , 3
.
5.
1
6.
.
7.
, .
: : : : ( ( ( ( O O O O ) ) ) ) ( ( ( ( ) ) ) )
2008 02
: ()

.
.
.
.