2014624

we care we serve we excel

2

Photo/Flickr.CC/ Carl Jones(Cut Part)https://www.flickr.com/photos/_belial/4881763904/

3

Immanuel KantImmanuel KantImmanuel KantImmanuel Kant

17241724172417244444222222221804180418041804222212121212

4

5

2008200820082008

Wheel in Motion!

106

17

103140

1021021021027,3787,3787,3787,378

107107107107

102102102102

3.96%

12.41%

0.01%

41.48%

31.62%

10.52%

/

////

1 1 1 1

2009200920092009

1998/5/27

1999

WTO

2002/1/1 GPA

2009

1925+1972-1999

WTOGPAAgreement on Government Procurement

2009

WTO1996

// GPA

1.6 1.7 GDP15

13

2014.03.14

WTO16043GPA+28

GPA27()

WTOGPAAgreement on Government Procurement2009

GPA

10100114530

GPA 2014201420142014FFFF----

200111WTOGPA200111WTO

GPA

GPA2013201320132013

GPAGPAGPAGPA

GPA

()

GPA

3 2.42% 135.13 9.04%

134 19.82% 545.80 57.20%57.20%57.20%57.20%

5 0.36% 2.54 0.72%

142 6.50% 683.47 24.39%24.39%24.39%24.39%

201011.1%

201324.3%

116

GPA60 220

16

20116.6

20128.8

2009GPA20

( 2014.03.14)

2013

2013

2014

2014

GPAGPAGPAGPA

////

(19981999/5/27)

1

18

45

63

71

74

87

93

114

/

/

?

?

++++1.1.1.1. 2.2.2.2.3.3.3.3. 4.4.4.4.5.5.5.5. 6.6.6.6.

?

FAR 33.201 ADR

Q:

FAR, Federal FAR, Federal FAR, Federal FAR, Federal Acquisition RegulationAcquisition RegulationAcquisition RegulationAcquisition Regulation

33.204 Policy.The Governments policy is to try to resolve all contractual issues in controversy by mutual agreement at the contracting officers level. Reasonable efforts should be made to resolve controversies prior to the submission of a claim. Agencies are encouraged to use ADR procedures to the maximum extent practicable.

ADR

23

FAR

/

/

+

+

1. 1/52.

7

/4

6

7

8

9

[]FAR

/

30

/

82

841

FAR

/?

/?

/

FAR-(85-1)

1.

()

2.

()

1.

()

2.

()

6+3

GPA

GPA

GPA

GPA

GPA

GPA

43

2009GPA43GPAGPA 4227

GPA

GPAGPAGPAGPA

2014.3.142014.3.142014.3.142014.3.14

=Buyer

GPA/

GPA(1.7)

/(1)(2)/

1/

2

/

35

breach LossPenalty Cost

[]

////

////

10114

?

2102102102105

44 192

51295

38

=

=

101

102

9696969644441616161609600151280096001512800960015128009600151280

100100100100340103401034010340101011

100100100100140491404914049140493

40

Federal Acquisition Regulation

Subpart 9.4 FAR 9.405

FAR9.406-1(a) 9.406-29.406-3

41

?

Title 48 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations

(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)

(6)(7)(8)(9)(10) 42

?

FAR

I 0950382

B

II (96891

211

50N250N

33III

Federal Acquisition Regulation

FAR

58

58585858

45

FAR

14.407-1 General. After the opening of bids, contracting officers shall examine all bids for mistakes. In cases of apparent mistakes and in cases where the contracting officer has reason to believe that a mistake may have been made, the contracting officer shall request from the bidder a verification of the bid, calling attention to the suspected mistake. If the bidder alleges a mistake, the matter shall be processed in accordance with this section 14.407. Such actions shall be taken before award.

14.407

14.407-2 Apparent clerical mistakes. (a) Any clerical mistake, apparent on its face in the bid, may be corrected by the contracting officer before award. The contracting officer first shall obtain from the bidder a verification of the bid intended. Examples of apparent mistakesare

(1) Obvious misplacement of a decimal point; (2) Obviously incorrect discounts (for example, 1 percent 10 days, 2 percent 20 days, 5 percent 30 days); 1 percent 10 days, 2 percent 20 days, 5 percent 30 days(3) Obvious reversal of the price f.o.b. destination and price f.o.b. origin; and f.o.b. f.o.b. (4) Obvious mistake in designation of unit.

14.407-3 Other mistakes disclosed before award(a) If a bidder requests permission to correct a mistake and clear and convincing evidence establishes both the existence of the mistake and the bid actually intended, the agency head may make a determination permitting the bidder to correct the mistake; provided, that if this correction would result in displacing one or more lower bids, such a determination shall not be made unless the existence of the mistake and the bid actually intended are ascertainable substantially from the invitation and the bid itself.

14.407-3 Other mistakes disclosed before award(c) If, under paragraph (a) or (b) of this subsection, (1) the evidence of a mistake is clear and convincing only as to the mistake but not as to the intended bid, or (2) the evidence reasonably supports the existence of a mistake but is not clear and convincing, an official above the contracting officer, unless otherwise provided by agency procedures, may make a determination permitting the bidder to withdraw the bid. (a)(b)(1)(2)

////

8

Q101

31/

/

Far/

/

54

/

(/)

FARADR

((((FARFARFARFAREU)EU)EU)EU)////

???? []

[[[[]]]]

GPA

56

Harvard Law Bulletin2006.

5858