45_20071227_carl robertus wam foam wma twg

Upload: sumit-kirat

Post on 10-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 45_20071227_Carl Robertus WAM Foam WMA TWG

    1/22

    WAM Foam: asphalt pavements at

    lower temperatures

    WMA TWG, 12 December 2007, Hunt Valley - MD

  • 8/8/2019 45_20071227_Carl Robertus WAM Foam WMA TWG

    2/22

    2

    WAM Foam

    Basic Concept & History

    Field Experience

    Emission Reduction

    US Perspective

  • 8/8/2019 45_20071227_Carl Robertus WAM Foam WMA TWG

    3/22

    3

    100000

    10000

    1000

    100

    10

    1

    0.5

    V 0.2

    0.1

    ViscosityPa.s

    -60 32 120 210 300 390 480

    F

    Soft asphalt

    component

    Hard asphaltcomponentPG 64-22

    Basic Concept

    0 50 7525

    Temperature

  • 8/8/2019 45_20071227_Carl Robertus WAM Foam WMA TWG

    4/22

    4

    DRYER MIXER SILO LAYING

    DRYER MIXER SILO LAYING

    TRADITIONAL HOT MIXASPHALT

    WAM FoamASPHALT MIX PROCESS

    6%ASPHALT

    5% FILLER 20 OC

    90% AGGREGATE

    1.8 % SOFT

    4.2 % HARDCOMPONENT

    90% AGGREGATE

    Schematics of the typical process conditions

    390 OF 300-350 OF 270-320 OF

    260 OF 225 OF 180-220 OF 175-200 OF

    320 OF

    5% FILLER 20 OC

  • 8/8/2019 45_20071227_Carl Robertus WAM Foam WMA TWG

    5/22

    5

    DG 11

    PG 52-28

    (180/220)

    May

    1999

    1st WAM Foam 1999 (Norway)

  • 8/8/2019 45_20071227_Carl Robertus WAM Foam WMA TWG

    6/22

    6

    WAM Foam after two years

    June 2001June 2001

  • 8/8/2019 45_20071227_Carl Robertus WAM Foam WMA TWG

    7/22

    7

    foam

    mixer

    2000

    WAM Foam installation inHot Mix Asphalt plant

  • 8/8/2019 45_20071227_Carl Robertus WAM Foam WMA TWG

    8/22

    Aggregate > 4 mm

    Soft Bitumen

    Aggregates 0-4 mm

    Hard Bitumen Foam

    Filler

    Discharge

    0 25 35 55Time (s) 5

    -

    Mixing

    15

    Mixing

    Batch Plant Mixing Cycle 3.5 ton batch

  • 8/8/2019 45_20071227_Carl Robertus WAM Foam WMA TWG

    9/22

    9

    WAM Foam, DG 11, PG58-22

    (80 pen)

    May 2002

    Reference, DG 11, PG58-22

    (80 pen)May 2002

    Field trials RV 120 September 2000

  • 8/8/2019 45_20071227_Carl Robertus WAM Foam WMA TWG

    10/22

    10

    Rut development on RV 120

    Rv 20, Hp2, Km 6.823- 7.686, Length 0.863 km

    Akershus

    0

    10

    1

    20

    2

    01

    01

    92

    01

    01

    93

    01

    01

    9

    01

    01

    9

    01

    01

    9

    01

    01

    9

    01

    01

    9

    01

    01

    99

    01

    01

    00

    01

    01

    01

    01

    01

    02

    01

    01

    03

    01

    01

    0

    01

    01

    0

    01

    01

    0

    01

    01

    0

    Date

    Rutdepth(mm) 90 v lue

    e n v lue

    WAMAbg

    3.2 mm/year 2.9 mm/r

  • 8/8/2019 45_20071227_Carl Robertus WAM Foam WMA TWG

    11/22

    11

    WAM Foam SMA 11,Track-paving on E6 - June 2002

    Daily traffic 22000 vehicles - 65,2 kg/m2

  • 8/8/2019 45_20071227_Carl Robertus WAM Foam WMA TWG

    12/22

    12

    Adoption to Drum Mix Plant

  • 8/8/2019 45_20071227_Carl Robertus WAM Foam WMA TWG

    13/22

    13

    Emission

    measurements

    Source: Koenders et al, IRF 2004

    Asphalt Fume Emission monitoring

  • 8/8/2019 45_20071227_Carl Robertus WAM Foam WMA TWG

    14/22

    14

    Emission reduction Hot Mix WAM Foam

    TPM = Total Particulate Matter BSM = Benzene Soluble Matter

    TPM BSM

    0

    0,2

    0,4

    0,6

    0,8

    1

    1,2

    mg

    /m

    3

    1 2 1 2

    Location

    PLEASENOTE:

    Today typical Occupational

    Exposure Limits in Europeand US are

    TPM 5 mg/m3

    In this example

    Hot Mix emissions are still

    4 times lower

    than OE limit !!

    Fume emission measurement

    Source: Koenders et al, IRF 2004

  • 8/8/2019 45_20071227_Carl Robertus WAM Foam WMA TWG

    15/22

    15

    Measu e en s pe o ed by De No ske Ve i as

    a Ska nes 26 27/08 2002

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    3000

    3500

    [kg/h]

    WAMFoa MA

    31,5

    CO2

    CO2 emission during actual Production

  • 8/8/2019 45_20071227_Carl Robertus WAM Foam WMA TWG

    16/22

    16

    Measu e en s pe o ed b e o ske Ve as

    a Ska nes 26 27 08 2002

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    O Ox 1/100as pe

    [kg/]

    M Foa MA

    - 61 5 %

    - 28 5 %

    NOx and CO emission during actual Production

  • 8/8/2019 45_20071227_Carl Robertus WAM Foam WMA TWG

    17/22

    17

    1

    1

    Dust[kg/hour

    WA Foam H A

    Skarnes

    Dust54% reduction54% reduction

    Production process

    Dust emission during actual Production

  • 8/8/2019 45_20071227_Carl Robertus WAM Foam WMA TWG

    18/22

    18

    311rF 230 rF

    Illustrations

  • 8/8/2019 45_20071227_Carl Robertus WAM Foam WMA TWG

    19/22

    19

    Illustrations

    HMA WAM Foam

    329 rF

    230 rF

    vs.

  • 8/8/2019 45_20071227_Carl Robertus WAM Foam WMA TWG

    20/22

    20

    What has been we achieved with WAM Foam?

    30 % reduction in energy consumption,lower production costs

    30 % reduction in CO2-emissions,a gain for the environment!

    50 60 % reduction in dust emission,again a gain for the environment Fume from WAM Foam is below detection limits,

    Health & Safety!

    Reduced temperature => reduced oxidation/ageing of binder WAM Foam satisfies all Hot Mix Asphalt specifications according to Handbook 018

    (Norwegian Standard) Production Capacity maintained

  • 8/8/2019 45_20071227_Carl Robertus WAM Foam WMA TWG

    21/22

    21

    US Perspective

    Binder components now available in the US

    Final binders: PG 70-22, PG 64-22, PG 58-28

    Laboratory

    2007 mixing trials at Turner Fairbank / FHWA

    2007 evaluation at NCAT

    Included in study Industry tour 2007

    Further US field verification 2008

    Mid West

    Expand to modified grades ?

  • 8/8/2019 45_20071227_Carl Robertus WAM Foam WMA TWG

    22/22

    22

    US Perspective

    Positives (when compared to other WMA):

    No Additives, no expensive snake oils just add water

    Pre-coats Coarse Aggregate

    Absorptive Aggregates

    Challenges:

    Paradigm Shift

    Asphalt Plant Binder Blending

    PG Binder Grading system

    Performance Acceptance Projects

    Mix Design-Lab Foaming device

    Asphalt Plant Modifications