52-4-4

Upload: firsandiprasastyafikrygozali

Post on 03-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 52-4-4

    1/4

    Paediatrica IndonesianaVOLUME 52 NUMBER 4July

    Original Article

    Paediatr Indones, Vol. 52, No. 4, July 2012 209

    Efficacy of synbiotic and probiotic treatments on acute

    watery diarrhea in children

    Ani Isti Rokhmawati, Wahyu Damayanti, Madarina Julia

    AbstractBackground In developing countries, acute watery diarrhea isDFRPPRQFDXVHRIPRUELGLW\DQGPRUWDOLW\LQFKLOGUHQ*LYLQJ

    synbiotics or probiotics may decrease the severity of diarrhea.

    Objective To compare the efficacy of synbiotics and probioticsLQGHFUHDVLQJWKHIUHTXHQF\RIGLDUUKHDVKRUWHQLQJWKHGXUDWLRQ

    and increasing patient body weight.

    Methods This was a double-blind, randomized clinical trial tocompare the effects of synbiotic vs probiotic treatment in children

    DJHGPRQWKVZLWKDFXWHZDWHU\GLDUUKHD7KLVVWXG\ZDV

    SHUIRUPHGIURP2FWREHUWR'HFHPEHULQWZRKRVSLWDOVLQ

    &HQWUDO-DYD6XEMHFWVUHFHLYHGHLWKHUV\QELRWLFVRUSURELRWLFV

    twice daily for five days. The measured outcomes were duration

    RIGLDUUKHDGDLO\IUHTXHQF\RIGLDUUKHDDQGLQFUHDVHLQERG\weight.

    ResultsThere was no significant difference in the mean durationof the diarrhea in the synbiotic and probiotic groups, 3.92 days

    6'YVGD\V6'3UHVSHFWLYHO\1RUGLG

    we observe a significant difference in the mean increase in body

    ZHLJKWLQWKHV\QELRWLFDQGSURELRWLFJURXSVJ6'YV

    J6'3UHVSHFWLYHO\

    Conclusion:HREVHUYHGQRVLJQLILFDQWGLIIHUHQFHVLQHIILFDF\RIsynbiotic and probiotic treatment for management of acute watery

    diarrhea. [Paediatr Indones. 2012;52:209-12].

    Keywords: Acute watery diarrhea, synbiotic,

    probiotic

    )URPWKH'HSDUWPHQWRI&KLOG+HDOWK*DGMDK0DGD8QLYHUVLW\0HGLFDO

    6FKRRO6DUGMLWR+RVSLWDO

  • 7/28/2019 52-4-4

    2/4

    Ani Isti Rokhmawati et al:6\QELRWLFDQGSURELRWLFWUHDWPHQWVRQDFXWHZDWHU\GLDUUKHD

    210Paediatr Indones, Vol. 52, No. 4, July 2012

    of acute watery diarrhea. Both reported significant

    benefits.+RZHYHUWKHUHKDVEHHQOLWWOHGDWD

    on which of the two, probiotics or synbiotics, is

    more effective for treating acute watery diarrhea in

    children.

    :HFRQGXFWHGWKLVVWXG\WRFRPSDUHWKHHIIHFWVRI

    V\QELRWLFVDQGSURELRWLFVLQGHFUHDVLQJWKHIUHTXHQF\of diarrhea, shortening the duration of diarrhea, and

    increasing body weight during illness.

    Methods

    :HFRQGXFWHGWKLVVWXG\LQWKHSHGLDWULFZDUGRI

    6RHUDGML7LUWRQHJRUR+RVSLWDO.ODWHQDQG0XQWLODQ

    +RVSLWDO0DJHODQJIURP2FWREHUWR'HFHPEHU

    7KHVWXG\GHVLJQZDVDUDQGRPL]HGGRXEOH

    EOLQGFOLQLFDOWULDO6XEMHFWVZHUHFKLOGUHQDJHG

    months with acute watery diarrhea admitted at the

    two hospitals. Acute watery diarrhea was defined as

    watery stools occurring more than three times per

    GD\DQGODVWLQJIRUDWOHDVWVHYHQGD\V:HH[FOXGHG

    subjects with bloody diarrhea and diarrhea with severe

    complications, such as severe dehydration, metabolic

    DFLGRVLVRUVHL]XUHV3DUHQWVRIVXEMHFWVSURYLGHG

    written informed consent. This study was approved

    E\WKH+HDOWKDQG0HGLFDO(WKLFV&RPPLWWHHRIWKH

    *DGMDK0DGD8QLYHUVLW\0HGLFDO)DFXOW\

    7KHUHTXLUHGQXPEHURIVXEMHFWVZDV

    determined by hypothesis test, based on the means

    RIWKHWZRSRSXODWLRQV6XEMHFWVZHUHFRQVHFXWLYHO\

    allocated into the two treatment groups using a

    random number table. Only the appointed pharmacist

    KDGDFFHVV WRWKH VXEMHFWV DOORFDWHG LQWHUYHQWLRQwhile subjects and physicians were blinded to the

    information (see study profile inFigure 1).

    Before the study, subjects were examined to

    GHWHUPLQHWKHLUOHYHORIGHK\GUDWLRQEDVHGRQ:+2

    JXLGHOLQHV6XEMHFWVVXIIHULQJIURPGHK\GUDWLRQ

    were rehydrated before weighing. The synbiotic and

    probiotic sachets were administered twice daily for five

    GD\VE\QXUVHV3DWLHQWFRPSOLDQFHZDVUHFRUGHG

    The physician evaluated the level of dehydration

    DQGIUHTXHQF\RIGLDUUKHDHYHU\WZRKRXUVLQWKH

    first six hours after admission, followed by evaluation

    HYHU\WZHOYHKRXUV:HHYDOXDWHGWKHGXUDWLRQRI

    diarrhea from acute watery diarrhea, as well as the

    increase in body weight during illness. Duration of

    GLDUUKHDZDVGHILQHGDVWKHWLPHWDNHQIRUGLDUUKHDO

    IUHTXHQF\WRGHFUHDVHWROHVVWKDQWKUHHWLPHVSHUGD\

    If subjects were discharged in less than five days, we

    DVNHGSDUHQWVWRKDYHWKHLUFKLOGUHQZHLJKHGDWWKH

    outpatient clinic on day five after admission.

    $OORFDWHGIRUV\QELRWLFLQWHUYHQWLRQQ

    5DQGRPL]HGQ

    $VVHVVHGIRUHOLJLELOLW\Q

    ([FOXGHGQ

    'LGQRWPHHWLQFOXVLRQFULWHULDQ

    'HFOLQHGSDUWLFLSDWLRQQ

    2WKHUUHDVRQVQ

    Figure 1.6WXG\SUROH

    /RVWWRIROORZXSQ

    $QDO\]HGQ $QDO\]HGQ

    /RVWWRIROORZXSQ

    $OORFDWHGIRUSURELRWLFLQWHUYHQWLRQQ

  • 7/28/2019 52-4-4

    3/4

    Ani Isti Rokhmawati et al: 6\QELRWLFDQGSURELRWLFWUHDWPHQWVRQDFXWHZDWHU\GLDUUKHD

    Paediatr Indones, Vol. 52, No. 4, July 2012 211

    Results

    2IWKHFKLOGUHQUHFUXLWHGVXEMHFWVFRPSOHWHG

    the study. There were 88 subjects in each of the two

    groups. Baseline characteristics of subjects are shown

    in Table 1. The results of this study are shown in

    Table 2. There was no significant difference in theGXUDWLRQRIWKHGLDUUKHD3WKHGDLO\IUHTXHQF\

    RIGLDUUKHDRUWKHLQFUHDVHLQERG\ZHLJKW3

    :HREVHUYHGSRWHQWLDOVLGHHIIHFWVRIJLYLQJV\QELRWLFV

    DQGSURELRWLFVOLNHEORDWLQJDQGIODWXOHQFH7KUHH

    patients suffered from bloating in synbiotic group. No

    other gastrointestinal adverse effects were observed

    during the study.

    Discussion

    :HFRQGXFWHGWKLVVWXG\WRFRPSDUHWKHHIIHFWVRI

    V\QELRWLFVDQGSURELRWLFVLQGHFUHDVLQJWKHIUHTXHQF\

    of diarrhea, shortening the duration of diarrhea, and

    LQFUHDVLQJERG\ZHLJKWGXULQJLOOQHVV:HIRXQGQR

    significant differences between the two groups forPHDQGDLO\IUHTXHQF\RIGLDUUKHDPHDQGXUDWLRQRI

    diarrhea or mean increase in body weight.

    :H REVHUYHG VLGHHIIHFWV VXFKDV EORDWLQJ

    and flatulence, from both synbiotic and probiotic

    treatment. Three patients in the synbiotic group

    suffered from bloating. Fermentation of the substrate

    (prebiotics) produces hydrogen, which may cause

    Table 1.$CUGNKPGEJCTCEVGTKUVKEUQHUWDLGEVU

    Characteristics Synbiotic group(n=88)

    Probiotic group(n=88)

    Mean age, months SD 27.69 13.73 23.69 14.74

    Gender

    Males, n (%) 51 (58) 41 (47)

    Females, n (%) 37 (42) 47 (53)

    Socio-economic status1

    Low, n (%) 21 (24) 41 (76)

    High, n (%) 67 (76) 47 (34)

    Nutritional status2

    Undernourished, n (%) 31 (35) 34 (38)

    Well-nourished, n (%) 57 (65) 54 (62)

    1&GVGTOKPCVKQPQHUQEKQGEQPQOKEUVCVWUYCUDCUGFQPVJGTCVKQQHOGCNGZRGPFKVWTGVQOQPVJN[HCOKN[KPEQOG+P%GPVTCN,CXCKPJKIJUQEKQGEQPQOKE

    UVCVWUYCUFGPGFCUCTCVKQQHYJKNGNQYUQEKQGEQPQOKEUVCVWUYCUFGPGFCUCTCVKQQH9

    20WVTKVKQPCNUVCVWUYCUECVGIQTK\GFD[DQF[YGKIJVHQTJGKIJV\UEQTGDCUGFQPVJG9*1ITQYVJUVCPFCTF1DGUKV[YCUFGPGFCUC\UEQTGQH

    5&YGNNPQWTKUJGFYCUFGPGFCUC\UEQTGQH5&VQ5&YCUVKPIYCUFGPGFCUC\UEQTGQH5&VQ5&YJKNGUGXGTGYCUVKPIYCUFGPGFCU

    C\UEQTGQH5&6JGUGHQWTECVGIQTKGUYGTGEQODKPGFKPVQITQWRUYGNNPQWTKUJGFHQTQDGUKV[CPFYGNNPQWTKUJGFEQODKPGFCPFWPFGTPQWTKUJGF

    HQTYCUVKPICPFUGXGTGYCUVKPIEQODKPGF

    Table 2.4GUWNVUQHVJGUVWF[

    Variables Synbiotic group

    (n=88)

    Probiotic group

    (n=88)

    /GCP&KHHGTGPEG 95% CI P value

    /GCPFWTCVKQPQHFKCTTJGCFC[Uv5& 3.92 0.79 3.80 0.82 - 0.11 -0.35 to 0.12 0.35

    /GCPHTGSWGPE[QHFKCTTJGCRGTFC[v

    SDday 1 6.871.62 6.671.52 - 0.20 -0.67 to 0.26 0.39

    day 2 4.471.82 4.281.78 -0.19 -0.72 to 0.34 0.47

    day 3 2.571.52 2.521.56 -0.05 -0.51 to 0.4 0.80

    day 4 0.941.09 1.131.50 0.19 -0.19 to 0.58 0.33

    day 5 0.230.47 0.200.45 -0.03 -0.17 to 0.10 0.63

    Mean increase in body weight, grams

    SD

    150 49.7 165 48.9 15.0 -1.01 to 29.9 0.67

  • 7/28/2019 52-4-4

    4/4

    Ani Isti Rokhmawati et al:6\QELRWLFDQGSURELRWLFWUHDWPHQWVRQDFXWHZDWHU\GLDUUKHD

    212Paediatr Indones, Vol. 52, No. 4, July 2012

    bloating, flatulence, and diarrhea. But it is difficult

    to differentiate if these effects are due the diarrhea

    itself or due to the additional substrates (prebiotics).

    3UHYLRXVLQYLWURVWXGLHVUHSRUWHGWKDWV\QELRWLFV

    GHFUHDVHGWKHIUHTXHQF\RIGLDUUKHDVKRUWHQHGWKH

    duration of diarrhea, and increased body weight

    better than probiotics. The addition of substratefor bacterial growth to the live microbes increases

    EDFWHULDOVXUYLYDO*DODFWRROLJRVDFFKDULGHVZHUHQRW

    only beneficial for the administered bacteria, but

    also for the residing bifidobacteria and lactobacilli

    in the intestines. Many species of bifidobacteria and

    lactobacilli other than the administered probiotics were

    observed in the feces after synbiotic treatment.

    3UHYLRXVVWXGLHVDVVHVVLQJWKHHIILFDF\RISURELRWLFV

    compared to placebo, as well as synbiotics compared to

    placebo, in the management of acute watery diarrhea,

    reported significant benefits.This study is the first

    to compare administered synbiotics and probiotics in

    the management of acute watery diarrhea in children.

    +RZHYHUZHREVHUYHGQREHQHILFLDOHIIHFWRIDGGLQJ

    prebiotics into the probiotics, i.e the synbiotics,

    compared to the probiotics alone. If the substrate for

    bacterial growth was already present in the intestines,

    adding additional substrate might be useless.

    A limitation of our study was that we did not

    DQDO\]HIRRGLQWDNHIURPGDLO\GLHW)RRGLQWDNHZRXOG

    affect the increase in body weight. Also, we assessed

    the degree of dehydration based on clinical findings

    DORQHQRWE\FKHFNLQJXULQHVSHFLILFJUDYLW\In conclusion, we found no significant differences

    LQGDLO\IUHTXHQF\DQGGXUDWLRQRIGLDUUKHDRULQFUHDVH

    in body weight between synbiotic and probiotic

    treatment in children with acute watery diarrhea.

    References

    .LQJ&. *LODVV 5%UHVHH-6'XJJDQ&0DQDJLQJ

    acute gastroenteritis among children, oral rehydration,

    PDLQWHQDQFHDQGQXWULWLRQDOWKHUDS\F>FLWHG

    6HSW@$YDLODEOHIURP KWWSZZZFGFJRYPPZUSUHYLHZ

    PPZUKWP

    2. %UDQVNL':LOVFKDQVNL0 3URELRWLFVLQ JDVWURLQWHVWLQDO

    GLVRUGHUV,Q%HKUPDQ5(.OLHJPDQ50-HQVRQ+%1HOVRQ

    WH[WERRNRISHGLDWULFVth HG3KLODGHOSKLD6DXQGHUV

    S

    3. 6DOD]DU/0LUDQGD/&DPSRV6&KDH:Lactobacillus casei

    VWUDLQ**LQWKHWUHDWPHQWRILQIDQWVZLWKDFXWHZDWHU\

    GLDUUKHDDUDQGRPL]HGGRXEOHEOLQGSODFHERFRQWUROOHG

    FOLQLFDOWULDO%0-3HGLDWU

    4. Cohen MB. Evaluation and treatment of the child withDFXWHGLDUUKHD,Q5XGROSK&'5XGROSK$0+RVWHWWHU

    0./LVWHU*6LHJHO1-HGLWRUV5XGROSKV3HGLDWULFV st

    HG1HZFLWHG6HSW@$YDLODEOHIURPhttp://www.bps.go.id Dughera L, Elia C, Navino M, Cisaro F, the ARMONIA study

    group.Effects ofsymbiotic preparations on constipated irritable

    ERZHOV\QGURPHV\PSWRPV$FWD%LRPHG

    5DXWDZD6 6DOPLQHP6 ,VRODXUL( )XQFWLRQDOIRRG

    science gastrointestinal physiology and function. Br J Nutr.

    6FKH]HQPHLU-+HOOHU.0F&XH0/LDPDV&/DP:%XURZ

    +GXUDWLRQRIGLDUUKHD%HQHILWRIRUDOVXSSOHPHQWDWLRQZLWK

    and without synbiotics in young children with acute bacterial

    LQIHFWLRQ&OLQ3HGLDWULF

    6LPDNDFKRUQ13LFKDLSDW95LWKLSRUQSDLVDUQ3.RQJNDHZ

    &7RQJSUDGLW3 9DUDYLWK\D:&OLQLFDOHYDOXDWLRQRI WKH

    DGGLWLRQRIO\RSKLOL]HGKHDWNLOOHGLactobacillus acidophilus LB

    to oral rehydration therapy in the treatment of acute diarrhea

    LQFKLOGUHQ-3HGLDWU*DVWURHQWHURO1XWU