台灣急診醫療糾紛現狀
DESCRIPTION
台灣急診醫療糾紛現狀TRANSCRIPT
- 1. Medical Malpractice
2.
3. 4. 5. MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE SEPSIS
6. Missed and Delayed Diagnoses in the EDAnn Emerg Med 49 (2007),
pp. 196205
Key characteristics of 79 diagnostic errors in the ED.
7. 8.
9.
184
9
10.
2842
15
11. 12.
82
953884
13.
12-1 (980513)
14. Beauchamp & Childress
1
1
Respect for Autonomy -
2
Non-maleficence -
3
Beneficence -
4
Justice -
2
4
3
15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. Vol.6 No.3 (2004/09)349-357
22. 23. 24. 3 1 2008.01.20
909415200
5010
902194131415151817166.6 2/3156
25. 2008
26. 27.
28. 29. 2008-07-07
30. 31. 1132002007/08/10
11 3200
230020005%750160
851248
6800
21101638
2230
32. 33002007104
3300
130044963,000
48918
96400065
33. 310020100327
53100
3936 2005 604129150
3
28001503
34. A 1.5 20100325
35. 7 60020100325
600
732004 94,500
36. 37. Relationships between Shit Work, Fatigue &
Performance
Ambient factor
Shift length
Workload
Stress
Light
Noise
Temperature
Personal factor
Physical health
Affective state
Alcohol, drugs
Age
Commitments
Outside ED
Shift work
Circadian
Dys-synchronizaton
Fatigue
Sleep deprivation
Sleep debt
Impaired clinical performance
Rosens Emergency Medicine
2006, p3122
Medical Error
38. 39. Process Mapping Showing Sources of Failures
Violation producing factors
Cognitive properties of the mind
Sense making
Prolonged wait time for bed
Affective state
Procedural faults
Radiology error
Triage cueing
Medication error
Fatigue & shift work
Admit
EMS
Disposition
Assessment
Diagnosis
Treatment
Management
Ttriage
Patient presentation
Discharge
Orphaned patients
Transitions of care
Report delays
EDdesign
Information gaps
Authority gradients
Resource constraints
Teamwork problems
Laboratory error
Overcrowding
Inadequate discharge plan
Follow-up failure
Rosens Emergency Medicine
2006, p3120
40.
2000
85%
17.6%
35.3%440