22 33

AHP

44

5 66

6AHP

7T. L. Saaty197119962001AHP2007AHP200720042002AHP2003

71996-2011-2011-2011-2011-2011-2011-200920042011

8 99

10(Analytic Hierarchical Process, AHP)

Saaty (1980) AHP

AHP(1/2)

AHP

(Feeling)11(2/2)

AHP

AHP

12

(1/2)

13

(2/2)

14(1/4)

3_3.1: AHP 1 (Equal Importance) 3 (Week Importance) 5 (Essential Importance) 7 (Very Strong Importance) 9 (Absolute Importance) 2,4,6,8 (Intermediate Values) 153_3.21Q5_1Q5_2Q5_3X1Q5_4Q5_5XX1Q5_6XXX1(2/4)

163_3.3Q5Q5_1/Q5_2/Q5_3/Q5_4/Q5_5/Q5_6/(3/4)

17

(4/4)

18

MySurvey

193_5.1Q1Q2Q3Q4Q5_1Q6_1600:01:002441551000:01:172241338600:02:372121538900:03:43212125Q1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q5_1Q6Q6_1(1/3)

20(2/3)

3_5.1Q1~Q4Excel

21(3/3)

441

22(1/10)

(1)

23

(2/10)

(2)

24

24(3/10)

AHP

(3)

25

(4/10)

(5)

26

(5/10)

(5)

(6)

27

(6/10)

(4)

C.I.Consistency IndexC.R.0.1

28

(7/10)

C.R.

(4)C.I.C.I. = 0 C.I. > 0 29(8/10)

(7)

C.R.0.1(4)

C.R.0.1(4)

30

(9/10)

(7.1)

(7.2)

(7.1) (7.2)

31

(10/10)

139C.R.0.1

161C.R.0.1

323_5.2 C.R.Q6_1Q6_2Q6_3Q6_4Q6_5Q6_60.008618213900:03:375433350.140281016100:03:0152554433333_5.1Q1Q2Q3Q4Excel

286222205200

1313992502723

34344_1.1_14723%3919%15877%16181%205100%200100%(1/2)

35(2/2)

3683152222707164_1.2_12510117101840654214418411003916627173(1/4)

37()(2/4)

384_1.2_264621110718301050610220411009211323177(3/4)

39()(4/4)

404_1.3_1170083118-2225101139823-30213540311252143916627173(1/4)

41()(2/4)

4218~224_1.3_2170063318-2265611010123-30510639312242149211323177(3/4)

43()(4/4)

4418~22(1/2)

>>> >>>

45

>>>45(2/2)

>>> >>>

46

>>>464747(1/4)

AHP48

1.AHP

2.

48(2/4)

49AHP

49(3/4)

5050(4/4)

51

51(1/2)

52

1.

52(2/2)

53

EXA:B=1:2B:C=2:3A:C=2:6A:C1:12.

Ex:AB=12BC=23AC= 26AC11 AB

53(1/2)

54

1.

54(2/2)

55

2.

55(1/2)

56(2002)(2004)(2011)(2010)(2011)PPT(2002)AHP(2003)57-82(2007)AHP97(2004)(2007)(http://admin.taiwan.net.tw/upload/contentFile/auser/b/wpage/chp1/1_1.3.htm)(2011)100-007(http://www.npf.org.tw/post/3/9308)-(2011)(http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/11/6/4/n3276548.htm)

2.

56(2/2)

57-(2011)(http://www.cna.com.tw/ShowNews/WebNews_Detail.aspx?Type=NewsTopic&TNo=219&ID=201106060001)-(2011)(http://easy.sina.com.tw/news/article_newsid-84577.html)-(2011)(http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/11/4/28/n3241601.htm)(2011)184(http://www.epochtw.com/10/8/9/145084.htm)-(2009)(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUu636cMQ_g)T. L. Saaty, Multicriteria Decision Making, The Analytic Hierarchical Process, European Journal of Operaitonal Research, 1971 .T. L. Saaty, Multicriteria Decision Making, The Analytic Hierarchical Process, RWS Publications, 1996 .T. L. Saaty, Decision making hierarchies, The Analytic Network Process (2nd ed.), RWS Publications, 2001 .Fu-Hsiang Chen, Tsung-Shin Hsu, Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, A balanced scorecard approach to establish a performance evaluation and relationship model for hot spring hotels based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Volume 30, Issue 4, December 2011, Pages 908-932,(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278431911000260)(2003)http://homepage.ntu.edu.tw/~ntut019/ltes/TEH2001.pdf(2002)2.

57E N D58?58