8. arbitraje.revista romana de arbitraje

Upload: valentin87

Post on 02-Jun-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/11/2019 8. ARBITRAJE.revista Romana de Arbitraje

    1/25

    CURTEA DE ARBITRAJ COMERCIAL

    INTERNATIONAL

    c.c.I.R.

    REVISTA

    ROMANA

    DEARBITRA.I

    f,7

    nnxrRoP

    &

    srRAToN

  • 8/11/2019 8. ARBITRAJE.revista Romana de Arbitraje

    2/25

  • 8/11/2019 8. ARBITRAJE.revista Romana de Arbitraje

    3/25

    Cuprins

    I .

    STUDII,

    ARTICOLE,

    COMENTARII

    The New Chilean

    Law on

    International

    Commercial

    Arbitration

    -

    Juan

    Eduardo

    Figueroa

    Valdes

    Interpretri

    al convenliei

    arbitrale

    in

    jurisprudenga

    romn

    gi elvegian

    I)

    -

    dr.

    Radu

    Bogdan

    Bobei

    Autonomia convenliei

    arbitrale

    in interdependenl cu

    principiul

    Kompetenz-Kompetenz

    -

    lect. univ.

    drd. Cristina

    Florescu

    Mon ismsaudua l i sm ina rb i t r a ju l

    omerc ia l

    I I I ) - p ro f .

    un i v .

    d r .

    V i c to rB ab iuc

    . . . .

    ' . . 37

    LaNov i t l ne l l e recen t i i f o rme ta l i anenmate r ied i a rb i t r a to -G io rg ioMeo . . . . . . . . 42

    t I .

    JURIS P RU

    E NTA

    A RB ITRA LA

    Competeng

    Stabilirea

    chivoc

    compcrenfei

    nstancide arbitraj

    nstituqionalizat

    accepgiunea

    intagmei,,locul

    rbitmjului

    uaf la

    Bucure;ti" util izarea

    imbii engleze

    n

    procedr-rra

    rrbitral clauz

    ompromisorie

    dentic

    cu

    clauza-tip

    de

    arbitraj recomandat

    e Curtea

    Inrernational

    e

    Arbitraj de

    pe lng

    Camera

    de Comer

    Internaional

    u

    s e d i u l l a P a r i s .

    . " 5 7

    investirea

    nstangei rarale

    u soluionarea

    nui

    litigiu decurgnd

    in

    sau

    n legtur

    cu un contract

    conginnd

    o

    clauz ompromisorie

    valid

    qi

    operant

    dezinvestireau puterede lucru judecata instanqei tatale consecinte

    -

    obligaia

    ribunaluluiarbitral

    de a

    proceda

    a verificarearopriei

    ompetente

    e

    solutionare

    it igiului

    inlocuirea

    procedurii

    somagiei e

    plata de procedura

    prer,z.ut

    e RPA-CA

    in

    temeiul

    art.

    5

    din

    aceste

    eguli

    . . .

    i8

    Neindicarea

    n

    coninutul

    clauzei ompromisorii

    a

    numelui

    arbitrilor

    saua modalitgii

    e numire

    a lor

    -

    indi-

    ca rea ins t i t u l i e i

    e rmanen te

    e a rb i t r a j

    re ia

    se a t r i bu ieso lug iona rea l i t i g iu lu i - consec in e

    . . . . . 60

    Inexistenga

    lauzei

    ompromisorii

    n conrractul

    i t igios existenga

    nui

    clauze

    ompromisorii

    n conginutul

    unui

    alt

    conrracr

    ncheiat ntre aceleaEi

    r i

    -

    existenqe-sine-stttoare

    celor

    dou

    contracte

    consecinqe

    .61

    Accepiunea

    intagmei

    , l i t igi i

    patrimoniale"

    caracter rbitrabil

    al

    aciunii

    n evacuare

    consecinge

    . ' . .62

    ClauzcomDromisorie lternativ sesizarea,u

    prioritate,

    a instantei

    statale

    consecinle

    Opgiunea

    xclusiv

    prilor penrru

    n.stana

    udectoreasc

    aupentru

    arbitraj

    libertatea e

    a incheia,

    de a

    nu

    incheia

    5i

    de

    a desfiina

    convenfia arbitral

    -

    mutuus clnsensus-mutuus

    isensus

    ' . .65

    Procedur

    arbitral

    Decesul nei

    pri

    i t igante

    n

    cadrul

    procedurii

    arbitrale

    obligativitatea

    ronun rii

    hotrrii

    n termende trei

    luni de

    a constituirearibunalului

    arbitral

    nerealizarea

    ransmisiunii

    egale cali t i l i i

    procesuale

    asive

    consecinte

    Lipsa

    caracterului

    ormal a

    incercri ide soluionare

    e cale

    amiabil

    a lit igiului

    comercial

    aplicarea

    revede-

    rilor art.

    720'

    C.pr.civi la

    n condigi i le

    onvenitede

    pri excepIia

    naplicabil i tal i i

    procedurii

    concil ier i i

    preala-

    bi le - stricta nterpretare iaplicare excepqici . . . 6 8

    Hotrre

    arbitral

    Cerere

    de

    indreptare,

    murire

    gi

    completare

    sentinfeiarbitrale

    inadmisibilitate

    specif icul

    rocedurii

    arbi-

    t r a l e - c o n s e c i n t e

    . . .

    ' . . 6 9

    Nr. 3

    (7)/Iulie-Septembrie

    2OO8

    1 8

    26

    67

  • 8/11/2019 8. ARBITRAJE.revista Romana de Arbitraje

    4/25

    Cupr ins

    Efectele

    otrriiarbitrale

    autoritatede

    lucru

    iudecat

    consecinte

    Cheltuieli arbitrale

    72

    Achitarea

    ntegral

    litigios punerea

    n

    a debitului

    reclamatpn

    la

    prima

    zi

    de

    inFqi;are

    intrziere e drept

    cu privire

    a

    plata

    cheltuielilor

    e

    -

    caracterul

    comercial

    al

    contractului

    arbitrare

    nainte de

    introducerea

    ererii

    de arbitrare

    76

    Prescriplia

    dreptului

    material

    la

    acliune

    Refuzulde plata filei CEC girate neexercitareae ctreposesorul EC-ului a dreptului de regresmpotriva giran-

    tului,

    trgtorului

    Ei

    celor lal i

    obligagi

    in tcrmenul dc

    prescripgie

    e 6

    luni

    -

    consecinge

    dublarea

    raportului

    i-rndamental e un

    raport derivat din girarea

    unor

    filc

    CEC

    in

    scopul

    stingerii

    debitului principal

    con-

    secinele

    aportului de accesorialirate

    ntre

    aciunile

    derivate

    in transmisiunea

    nui

    CEC

    qi

    aciunea

    cavzaJ .

    .77

    Stingerea

    obligafilor

    comerciale

    Inexistenta aracterului

    ert,

    ichid

    9i

    exigibi l

    al obligaiei

    banegti consecine

    . , ,79

    Novaq ie r i nsch imbarede

    eb i t o r -p r i nc ip i i

    de

    n te rp re ta re

    .

    . . . . ' . '

    81

    Contract

    de asigurare

    Neexecutare ulpabil de ctreasigurtora obligaieide a anexacontractului de asigurare ocumentele

    eferitoare

    la expedigia, ransportul,

    recepgiamrfurilo

    asigurate

    consecinge

    lipsa svririi

    de ctre

    asigurat,

    cu

    intenie

    ,"'-r it-,culp,

    a unor

    acrede natur

    s mpiedice

    subrogarea

    sigurtorului

    n

    drepturile

    sale pasivitatea

    otal

    a

    asigurtorului

    obligaia

    contractual

    a asigurtorului

    de

    a plati

    indemnizalia

    de asigurare

    inexistenga

    vreunei meniuni

    pe documentele

    de transport

    cr-r rivire

    la avarierea

    mrfii asigurate

    momentul anterio

    predarii

    spre

    ransporta

    mrfii asigurate

    consecinqe

    . . .84

    Contract

    de

    leasing

    Execurarea argiala

    i

    cu

    intrziere e

    ctreutilizatora

    obligaiei e plat

    a

    ratelorde

    leasing

    i

    a primelor

    de

    asi-

    gu ra re - rez i l i e reconven t iona l - consec in e

    ' . . . . 87

    Neconresrareae

    ctreutilizaror

    a nepltii

    sumei

    de

    bani datorate

    u t i t lu de penalit i

    i

    comisioane

    consecine

    ta-x e reziliere calificare finali tate inexistenra nui dezechil ibru emnificativntre drepturilegi obligaEiile

    prgilor

    consecinre

    lipsa emiterii

    facrurii iscale ferente

    rei de

    reziliere

    nerelevang

    stipularea

    nor

    sancliuni

    conrracruale

    lternative enrru

    ntrzierea

    laii

    ratelor

    e

    easing

    aplicarea

    ancgiunii

    ezilieriin temeiul

    ur.rui

    ac t

    comisoriu

    xpres e gradul

    V

    . . . 89

    III. VARIA

    A. Congrese,

    conferinte,

    ateliere

    ,,Conuenia

    e la New

    Yorle

    50

    de ani",

    1 februarie

    2008,

    New York

    . . . .93

    B. Recenzii

    B.l. Arbitration

    International,

    4, 2007

    241 pagini

    . . , .

    .

    93

    B.2. AustrianArbitration

    Yearbook

    2008, Editura C.H.

    Beck,Stampfli,

    Manz, Viena,

    2008,

    532

    pagini

    . .93

    Resta

    Romn

    de Arbitraj

  • 8/11/2019 8. ARBITRAJE.revista Romana de Arbitraje

    5/25

    Content

    I. STUDIES,

    ARTICLES, COMMENTARIES

    The New Chilean

    Law on

    International

    Commercial

    Arbitration

    (I)

    -

    Juan

    Eduardo

    Figueroa

    Valdes .

    . . .

    I

    Approaches

    of arbitration

    agreement

    n Romanian

    and Swiss

    case

    aw- Radu

    Bogdan

    Bobei,

    Ph.D. .

    . . l8

    Separability

    of arbitration

    agreement

    and

    its relation with

    Kompetenz

    -

    Kompetenz

    principle

    -

    PHD

    candi-

    d a i e C r i s t i n a F l o r e s c u ,

    e c t u r e r

    . . , . . . . . 2 6

    Monism or dualism in commercial arbitration (III) - Profcs.sorictor Babiuc,Ph.D.

    LaNov i t ) ne l l e recen t i

    i f o rme

    ta l i anen

    mate r ie i a rb i t r a to -G io rg io

    Meo

    ' . . . . . . . 42

    II.

    ARBITRAL

    IURISPRUDENCE

    Competence

    Ambiguous

    assignation f

    the competence

    f

    an arbitral

    ribunal

    constituted

    under

    institutionalised

    Rulesof

    arbitration-meaning

    of words

    ,,t/e

    uenue

    f arbitration shall

    be

    Bucharest"

    using

    English

    anguage

    n arbitral

    pro-

    cedure

    -

    arbitral

    clause

    d.ntical

    with standard

    clause

    recommended

    by

    International

    Court

    of

    Arbitration

    attached

    o the

    InternationalChamber

    of

    Commerce

    rom

    Paris

    ' ' '

    ' ' '

    57

    Submitting

    stare

    ourr

    with sett l inga

    disputearising

    out

    of or

    in connection

    with

    the contract

    containing

    a valid

    and

    operati,re

    rbitral agreemenr

    reject by state

    court with

    power

    of res

    udicata

    of submitting

    with settling

    hat

    dispuie

    consequen.es

    taskof arbitral

    ribunal

    to proceed

    with veri$' ing

    ts own

    competence

    o settle

    he dis-

    pure

    -

    replacing

    he procedure

    of pal,ment

    noticc rvith the

    procedure

    provided

    by

    Rules of

    procedure

    ssuedby

    Romanian

    Court of

    Arbi t rat ion

    under

    a t .

    5

    of thcsc

    Rules

    . . . . .

    58

    Lack of

    making

    referenceo rhe

    namesof arbitr:rtors

    r to

    the

    n-rerhod f

    appointrnent

    f arbitrators

    rovided

    by

    arbitration

    g.."-.n,-

    making

    referenceo permanent

    arbitral

    nstitution

    for settling

    of

    the dispute

    s referred

    c o n s e q u e n c e s

    " " " 6 0

    Lack of arbitrat ion

    agreemenr

    n

    disputed

    conrract

    arbitration

    agreement

    ontained

    n

    an another

    contract

    conc ludedby thesamear r i es - se l f - con ta inedx is tencef t hose wo con t rac t s - consequences' . . . . . ' ' 6 l

    Men ingo f

    words , , p rope r r yd i spu tes " -a rb i t r ab i l i t yo f

    c t i on

    o rev i c t i on - consequences

    . . . . . . 62

    A l te rna t i vea rb i t r a t i on

    g reemen t -p r i o r

    mak ing re fe rence tos ta tecou r t s - consequences

    . . .

    . . . 64

    Exclusive

    oprion

    of parties

    to submit

    the request

    o state

    court or

    to arbitration

    -

    option

    for concluding,

    not

    concluding

    or for annulling

    the arbitral

    agreement

    mttuus

    lnsensus-mutuus

    issensus

    . . .65

    Arbitral

    Proceedings

    proceedings-

    ompulsoriness

    f

    rendering

    he award

    within

    three

    -

    lack of acc omplishing

    egal ransmission

    f passive

    us standi

    -

    Lack of

    formal atrempr

    ro settle

    amicable

    commercial

    dispute

    appliance

    of an.

    720'

    Civi l

    Procedural

    Code

    under consentment

    f part ies

    exceprion

    f

    impracticableness

    f prior

    conciliation

    procedure

    strict

    nterpre-

    t a t i o n a n d a p p l i a n c e o f

    x c e p t i o n

    . . .

    ' . . 6 8

    37

    Death

    of

    lit igating party during

    the

    arbitral

    month

    Fromconstitution

    of arbitral

    tribunal

    conseouences . .

    Nr. 3

    (7)/lulie-Septembrie

    2O08

    II I

  • 8/11/2019 8. ARBITRAJE.revista Romana de Arbitraje

    6/25

    Content

    Arbitral Award

    Request

    or

    correction,

    clarification

    or completion of

    arbitral

    award

    -

    inadmissibility

    -

    distinctive

    feature of

    a r b i t r a l p r o c e e d i n g s - c o n s e q u e n c e s . . .

    ' . . . . . . . 6 9

    P owero f

    rb i t r a l wa rd

    res iud i ca ta - consequences

    .

    ' . . . . . . 72

    Arbitral

    Expenses

    Full payment

    of claimed

    debt prior to

    the fir st day of

    he

    arings

    commercial

    natureof disputed

    ontract

    notice

    de ure of delayof paymentarbi t ra lexpensesefore ubmission f requestor arb i t rat ion . . . . . . .76

    Limitation

    of substantive

    right to act

    Payment

    refusal of

    vouched CEC sheet

    -

    lack of exercising

    he

    right to throw-back

    against the

    guarantor'

    drawer

    and other

    obligedpersons

    within the

    imitation periodof

    6 month

    -

    consequences

    doubling

    he undamental

    relationwith a

    relationderiving

    rom

    guaranteeing

    omeCEC

    sheets

    or payingoff

    the

    main

    debt

    -

    consequences

    f

    accessory

    elationbenveen ctions

    deriving

    rom transmission

    f a CEC

    sheetand

    causal ction

    . .

    . . .

    77

    Extinguishment

    of commercial

    obligations

    Lack of existence

    f certain,

    liquid and claimable

    nature

    of pecuniary

    obligation

    -

    consequences

    . .

    ' . . . .

    79

    Nova t ionbychang ingdeb to r -

    r i nc ip les

    f

    i n te rp re ta t i on . .

    . . . . 81

    Insurance contract

    l.ack of

    faLrlry xecution

    of the

    insurer's bligation

    o annex

    o

    insurance ontract

    documents

    elated

    o expedi-

    tion,

    transport,

    eceiving f

    insuredgoods

    consequcnces

    insurant's

    ack of accomplishing,

    ith

    intention

    or

    by

    far"rlt, f a cts

    n order ro

    srop substitution

    of

    insr-rrcrn

    its rights

    full passivity

    f

    insurer

    contractual

    bl i-

    gation

    of

    insure o pay the premium

    -

    lack of exi stence

    f any

    mention

    on the

    transPortdocuments

    eferring

    t o

    i n j u r i e s s u f f e r e d b y i n s u r e d g o o d s - c o n s e q u e n c e s

    . . .

    . . . . .

    ' 8 4

    Leasing contract

    Partialand

    with delayexecution

    by user

    of payment

    obligation

    of

    leasing

    nstallments

    nd

    insurance remium

    -convent ional

    annulment-consequences

    .

    ' .

    '87

    Lack

    of contesting y user

    of not paying

    he amount of

    moneydue

    aspenalties

    nd

    commissions

    consequences

    -

    annulment

    fee

    interpretation

    main

    pLrrpose

    lack of existence

    f significant

    dissymmetry

    between

    on-

    tractual

    rights and obligarions

    -

    consequences

    lack of

    issuing the

    fiscal

    nvoice

    for annulment

    fee

    -

    lack of

    relevance stipulation

    alternative

    contractual sanctions

    or delay

    n payment

    of

    leasing nstalments

    applying

    the

    annulment

    sanctionbased

    on a explicit

    resolutive lause f

    IVth degree

    ' . . .

    . 89

    III. MISCELLANEOUS

    A. Congresses,

    onferences,

    orkshops

    ,,New

    YorkConuention

    50

    years",

    February 008, Neut

    Yorh . .

    B. Reviews

    8.1. Arbitration

    International,

    4, 2007,

    241

    pagcs

    .

    .

    . . . .

    93

    B.2.Austrian

    rbitration

    earbook008,C.H.

    BeckPublisher,

    tampfli,

    Manz,Vienna,

    008,532

    pages

    93

    93

    TV

    Revista

    Romn de

    Abitrai

  • 8/11/2019 8. ARBITRAJE.revista Romana de Arbitraje

    7/25

    Sommaire

    I. TUOPS,

    ARTICLES,

    COMMENTAIRES

    The New

    Chilian

    Law on International

    Commercial

    Arbitration

    -

    Juan

    Eduardo

    Figueroa

    aldes

    Interprtations

    e a convention

    arbitrale

    dans

    a

    jurisprudence

    oumaine

    et suisse

    I)

    -

    dr.

    Radu

    Bogdan

    Bobei

    Lautonomie

    de

    la clause

    d'arbitrage

    et

    son

    interdpendance

    avec

    e principe

    Kompetenz-Kompetenz

    -

    drd.

    Cristina

    Florescu,

    hargde

    cours

    Monisme

    ou

    dualisme

    de

    I'arbitrage

    commercial

    (ll l)

    -

    prof.

    univ.

    dr.

    Victor

    Babiuc

    La Noti

    nelle

    recenti

    riforme

    italiane

    in materie

    di arbitrato

    -

    Giorgio

    Meo

    II.

    JURISPRUDENCE

    ARBITRALE

    Comptence

    Dtermination

    quivoque

    de

    la

    comptence

    e

    la

    jur isdict ion

    d'arbitrage

    nstitut ionnalis

    acception

    u syn-

    ragme

    ,le

    ieu

    de'I'arbitrage

    sera

    Bicaresr"

    -

    utilisation

    de

    la langue

    anglaise

    dans

    la procdure

    arbitrale

    -

    la

    .liur.

    .ornpromissoire

    id.ntiqu.

    la clause-type

    d'arbitrage

    recommande

    par

    la

    Cour

    Internationale

    d'Arbitrage

    "up.,

    de

    la Chambre

    de

    Commerce

    nternational

    igeant

    Paris

    ' ' '

    57

    Saisrr

    a

    jur isdict ion

    tatiqr:e

    e

    la

    solut ion

    d'un

    li t ige

    contenant

    une

    clause

    ompromissoire

    alideet

    oprante

    dsaisir

    .

    pn,..uoir.

    . chose ugede la jur isdict iontatique consquencesobligationdu Tiibunal arbitralde

    procder

    la vrification

    .*la

    propre

    con-rptence

    e

    solution

    du

    lit ige

    -

    substitution

    de

    la procdure

    i ' i n o n c t i o . , d c p a y e r p a r l a p r o c d u r e

    r v u e

    a r R P A - C A c n v e r t u

    e l ' a r t . 5

    d e c e s r t g l e s

    . . . . . . 5 8

    Dfaur

    d' indication

    dans

    e contenu

    de

    la claLrsc ompromissoire

    u

    nom des

    arbitres

    ou de

    la

    modalit

    de

    nomination

    de

    ceux-ci

    idicarion de

    I'insritution

    permanenre

    'arbitrage

    harge

    e

    la solution

    du

    lit ige

    con-

    s q u e n c e s

    " " " " 6 0

    Inexistence

    e

    la clause

    ompromissoire

    ans

    e contrat

    i t igicux

    -

    existence

    'une

    clause

    ompromissoire

    ans

    le contenu

    d'un

    autre

    contrat

    conclu

    entre

    esmmes

    parties existence

    ndpendante

    es

    deux

    contrats

    con-

    squences

    " "

    '61

    Acception

    du syntagme

    ,litige.s

    atrimoniaux

    caractre

    rbitrable

    e

    I'actionen

    vacuation

    consquences

    . . 62

    Clausecompromissoireal ternat ive-sais ine,

    n pr ior i t,

    e la

    jur isdict ion

    tat ique-consquences

    ' . . . .64

    Option

    exclusive

    es parties

    pour

    la

    jurisdiction

    tatique

    ou pour

    I'arbitrage

    libert de

    conclure,

    de

    ne

    pas

    con-

    clr.r."

    t d'annuler

    l" .o.r,r.r,tlon

    arbitrale

    -

    mutuus

    clnsensus-mutuus

    issensus

    ' ' ' '

    65

    Procdure

    arbitrale

    l 8

    zt)

    42

    Dcsd'une

    partie

    itigieusependant

    a procdure

    rbitrale

    obligativit

    du

    trois

    mois depuis

    a

    constitut ion

    du

    Tiibunal

    arbitral

    non

    ralisation

    e

    la

    prononc

    e

    jugement

    part ir

    de

    transmission

    galede

    la

    qualit

    processuelle

    assive

    consquences

    o /

    Ddfaut

    du caractre

    ormal de

    la tentative

    de solution

    )

    I'amiablc

    du

    litige

    commercial

    application

    des

    dispositions

    de

    I'art.

    720'

    du

    Code

    de procdure

    civile dans

    les conditions

    tablies

    par

    les parties

    -

    exception

    de

    l'inapplicabilit e la procdr"rree la conciliationpralable interprtation t applicationstrictede I'exception . 68

    Sentence

    arbitrale

    Demande

    de

    correction,

    explication

    et compltement

    du

    jugement

    arbitral

    inadmissibilit

    spcifique

    e

    la

    procdure

    rbitrale

    consquences

    Nr.

    3

    (7)/Iulie-Septembrie

    2008

    69

  • 8/11/2019 8. ARBITRAJE.revista Romana de Arbitraje

    8/25

    Sommaire

    Efectsde

    la

    dcision

    arbitrale

    -

    autorit

    de chose

    uge

    -

    consquences

    Frais de

    I'arbitrage

    Paiement

    ntegraldu dbit

    rclam

    usqu'au

    premier

    our

    de comparution

    -

    caractre

    ommercial

    du contrat

    lit igieux

    -

    miie en

    retard de

    droit concernant

    e

    paiement

    des

    frais de

    l'arbitrage

    avant

    l' introduction

    de

    la

    deande

    d'arbitrage

    " "76

    Prescription

    du

    droit

    matriel

    I'action

    Refusde paiemenrde a feuillede chquegaranrie dfautd'exercicear e titulairedu chque u droit de regrs on-

    tre

    e grant,

    e tireur

    et lesautres

    bligs ans

    e dlaide prescriptior.r

    e

    6 mois

    -

    consquences

    doublage

    u

    rapport

    fond.ntal

    par

    un

    rapporr dcoul

    de

    la garantie cs

    euilles hque

    dans

    e but d'teindre

    e dbit

    principal

    corl-

    squences

    u

    rapporrd'accessorialit

    nrre

    esactions coulcs

    le

    a transmission

    'un

    chque

    t

    'action

    causale

    .77

    Extinction

    des

    obligations

    commerciales

    Inexistence

    u caractre

    ert,

    iquide et

    exigiblede

    I 'obligation

    pcuniaire

    consquences

    .

    . . . .

    .7 9

    Novation par

    changement

    u dbiteur

    principes

    d'interprtation

    Contrat

    d'assurance

    Non excution oupablepar I'assureur e I 'obligation

    de

    oindre

    au contrat

    d'assurance

    es

    documents

    elatifs

    I'expdition,

    u

    rransporr,

    la rception

    des

    marchandises

    ssures

    consquences

    dfaut

    de commission

    ar

    I'assur, vec

    dol

    oll par

    faute, des

    actesdestin.s

    empcher

    a subrogation

    de

    I'assureur

    ans

    sesdroits

    -

    passivit

    otale

    de

    I'assureur

    obligation

    contractuelle

    e

    I'assureur

    e payer

    I'indemnisation

    d'assurance

    inexistence

    'une

    mention

    sur

    les documents

    de trar-rsport

    ur

    l'avariede

    la

    marchandise

    ssure

    moment

    a n r r i e u r l a

    e m i s e p o u r l e

    r a n s p o r t d e l a

    a r c h a n d i s e

    s s u r e - c o n s q u e n c e s

    . . . . . . . 8 4

    Contrat

    de leasing

    Excutionpartielle

    er en retard

    par

    l'util isateurde

    l 'obligation

    de paiement

    des

    mensualits

    e

    leasing

    t des

    pr imesd'assurance-rsi l ia t ion

    onvent ionnel le

    consquences

    '

    "

    "

    "

    '87

    Manque

    de conrester

    ar

    'urilisateur

    u

    montant d titre de

    pnalits

    t commissions

    consquences

    taxe

    de

    rsili-

    arion-qualification - fin.lit - inexistence 'un dsquilibre ignificatifentre esdroitset lesobligations esParties

    -

    consquences

    dfaut

    d'mission

    de

    la facture

    fiscale

    elative

    la taxe de

    rsiliation

    -

    irrlvance

    stipulation

    des

    sanctioni

    conrracruelles

    lternativespour

    le rerarddu paiement

    des

    mensualits

    e

    leasing

    application

    de

    la

    sarction

    de

    la rsiliation

    en

    vertu

    d'un

    pacte

    commissoire

    exprsde

    IV-me

    degr

    '

    ' ' ' ' ' 89

    72

    8 t

    III.

    VARIA

    A. Congrs,

    confrences,

    ateliers

    ,,Conuention

    e

    New York

    50

    annes",

    fvrier 2008,

    New

    York

    B. Compte

    rendus

    B.1.

    Arbitration

    nternational,

    , 2007 241 pages . . .

    8.2.

    Austrian

    ubitration

    Yearbook

    2008,

    Maison d'dition

    C.H.

    Beck,

    Stampfli,

    Manz,

    Vienne,

    2008,

    93

    93

    \.I

    5?? neoes

    Resta

    Romn

    de

    Arbitrai

  • 8/11/2019 8. ARBITRAJE.revista Romana de Arbitraje

    9/25

    Studi i .art icole, omentari i

    The

    New Chilean

    aw

    on

    lnternational

    ommercial

    rbitration*

    Juan

    Eduardo

    Figueroa

    Valds

    Abstract

    The new

    Chilean

    International

    Commercirl

    Ar '

    bitration

    Law JV

    19.971 integrates

    Chile

    with

    rhe

    coun-

    tries

    tbat

    haue adopted

    n

    its international

    organizatiott,

    the

    LTNCITRAL

    nternational

    Arbitration

    Law of

    19r95,

    as

    a resPTnse

    o the

    modern

    tendency

    o the

    harmonizttrion

    of the international

    commercia/

    arbi*ation

    rules,

    proui-

    ding

    a

    flexible

    regulation,

    bdsed

    on the

    principle

    oJ'auro'

    nomy

    of will

    of the

    parties.

    It

    contibutes

    to clnuey

    dn

    image

    of seriousness

    nd reliability

    to

    the countr

    within

    the international business nd judicial communi4,, which

    carries

    udicial

    securi4t

    or

    inuestors

    and

    foreign

    clunter-

    parts.

    It creltes

    a

    juridical

    system

    or

    the

    resolution

    of

    international

    controuersies

    mong

    priuate

    people

    in the

    setting

    of

    the Association

    Agreementbetuteen

    Chile

    and the

    Eurl?ean community

    and the United

    Statesof

    America.

    Chile

    n he

    new

    nternational

    cenario

    ' l 'he

    introduct ion

    of Chi le

    in the

    Intcrnat ional

    Commerce

    nd

    n the

    global

    Economv

    hasstronglv

    cve-

    loped

    n recent

    ears.

    n the

    astFcw

    ears

    Chile

    has igned

    Free radc reat ies irh Canad,rn lq9- , rv i t l rMexico rr

    1998,wi th

    thc

    EuropeanCommunit

    Corea

    and thc

    U.S.

    n 200 3 and

    hasalso

    atified

    and subscribed

    grcc-

    ments,promotions

    nd protection

    f

    investments

    virh

    30

    countr ies;

    9

    European

    ountries,

    5

    countries

    rorn the

    Asian

    Pacificand

    14 American

    countries.'

    Both

    in the

    Free

    Trade

    Tieatiesand

    in the

    Promotion

    and

    Protection

    of

    Investments

    BITs)

    a conflict

    resolution

    system

    s ntro-

    duced,

    n which,

    after

    a

    ,,cooling

    lt{ t ' er iod

    or negotia-

    t ion

    and/or

    l imi ted

    Local Courts

    intervent ion.

    he

    -

    f t .^a

    by Interamerican

    Br Associat ion.

    ( lonference

    XI-I ,

    Buenos

    Aires,

    Argent ina,

    Jul

    2001.

    '

    Norwithstanding

    other

    14 subscr ibed

    greenlents

    f promotion

    and

    protect ion

    of

    instrument that

    have

    not been

    r:r t i f ied

    vet '

    ancl '

    adi t ional lv,

    B

    more agreements

    with negot iat ions

    n progress Sec

    www.direcon.cl.

    Nr.

    3

    (7)/lulie-Septembrie

    2008

    Juan

    Eduardo

    Figueroa

    Valds

    Rezumat

    lrloua lege

    chilian,i

    a arbitrajului

    comercial

    nternlt'

    tiondl

    determinti

    alinierea

    statului

    Chile

    n

    rndul

    arilor

    ce au

    adoptat

    in sistemul

    reglementdrii

    internaionale

    Regulile

    UNCITRAL

    referitoare

    la arbitrajul

    comercial

    itlrernatilnal,

    ca un

    rdspuns

    a

    tendina

    modernd

    de

    ar'

    monizare

    d regulilor

    arbitmjului

    comercial

    nternaional,

    fiind

    astfelfurnizatti

    0

    reglementare

    lexibil,i

    ntemeiata

    pe

    principiul autonomiei

    de

    uoind

    a

    pdrilor.

    Aceastd

    noud

    reg/ementare

    onnibuie

    la

    creareaunei

    imagini

    de serio'

    zitate ti de ncredere statului Chile tn cadrul comunit,iii

    internaionale

    uridice

    i

    economice,

    sPect

    econtribuie

    la

    securitatea

    uridic,i

    a inuestitorilor

    i

    a partenerilor

    acesto'

    ra.

    Este

    creltt un

    sistem

    uridic

    de soluionare

    a litigiilor

    intern/ltilna/e

    dintre

    entitai

    priuate

    prin tncheierea

    nor

    dcorduri

    de asociere

    ntre

    Cbile,

    Comu-nitatea

    Europeand

    si Srnrcle /nite

    ale Americii.

    Chi le

    in noul

    cadru

    internat ional

    Afirmarea

    Republici i

    Chile

    in comergul

    nternalio-

    nal

    ; i

    in economia

    globala

    -adezvoltat

    uternic

    n ult i-

    ma perioad.n ult imii ani, Chile a semnatacorduride

    liber schimb

    cu

    Canada

    n 1997,

    cu

    Mexic

    in 1998,

    cu

    Comunitatea

    European,

    u

    republica

    Coreea

    i

    Statele

    Unite

    in

    2003

    gi,

    de

    asemenea,

    ratificat'

    a aderat

    a

    acorduri

    de promovare

    ;i

    protecie

    a

    investiiilor

    cu

    30

    de

    state,

    19 din

    Europa,

    5

    gari

    din

    Asia

    9i

    14

    ari

    din

    continentul

    american'.

    Att

    in continutul

    acordurilor

    de

    liber schimb,

    ct

    gi

    n conEinutul

    ratatelor

    e prote-

    jare

    gi

    promovare

    a

    investigiilor

    aqa-numitele

    IT-uri),

    este

    ntrodus

    o

    modalitate

    de

    solugionare

    litigiilor

    -

    I*r., a fost premiat

    cle

    ]nteramerican

    Bar

    Association,

    Conf ir inta

    XL. l ,

    Buenos

    Aires,

    Argent ina,

    ul ic,

    2005.

    intr-o pr im

    fbrnri,

    studiul

    a fost publicat

    in Revistabraz"ilian

    e

    arbitraj

    qi

    mediere

    nr 6/2005,

    p.

    343-360

    nota

    edactorului-9ef

    r.

    Radu

    Bogdan

    Bobei) .

    Frira

    lua in cotrsiderar e

    lte

    14 acorduri

    de

    promovare

    i

    protejare

    a

    investitiilor,

    acorduri

    ce nu

    au fost

    nc rarificate

    i,

    n plus,

    alte 8 acor-

    duri

    ce sc afl

    n etapade

    negociere.

    sevedea

    www.direcon.cl

    Noua

    egechil ian

    arbitrajul

    omercial

    cu

    privirea

    international*

  • 8/11/2019 8. ARBITRAJE.revista Romana de Arbitraje

    10/25

    Studii . rt icole,omentari i

    investor

    may

    directlv

    bcgin

    an

    arbitral

    procedure

    gainst

    the State.

    Most BITs state hat this

    arbitration

    s promo-

    ted under

    the

    rules

    and

    regulations f

    the International

    Center

    or Resolution f

    Investments

    ICSID),

    when he

    signingStates

    rcpart of the

    ,,Convcntion

    n ResolLrtion

    and Differences

    elated o Investments

    etweenStates nd

    Natiorrs

    rom othe r States"

    965 Vashington Conven-

    tion.

    Otherwise,

    nother ypeof

    int i tut ionalarbirration

    s

    usually stablishcd

    san alternative,

    ikc the

    International

    Chamberof Commerce ICC) or th e ad hoc arbitration

    under

    the

    regulation f the United

    Nations Commirtee

    for the

    International

    Commercial

    Law; finall some

    rreaties r agreements

    llow the

    investor o go to rhe

    u-

    r isdict ionof the

    LocalCourts where he

    investment as

    done,

    asan

    alternative

    or international rbi tratior.r. '

    The tende ncy et by

    BITs hasextended o

    the multi-

    la te

    al reat ieshey

    part ic ipate

    n, or some

    at inAnrcr ican

    countries

    might

    potentially

    participate

    uch as NAF'fA

    (chapter

    1) ,

    or

    l ike the

    Protocole n Promot ionand

    Protection

    of Investmerlt

    rom countries hat do

    ntlt

    belong

    o MERCOSUR,

    among he countries

    hat belong

    to rhe Asuncin Tieary better knor.vnas MERCOSLIR

    (Argentina,

    razil,

    Paraguay nd Umguay) that consider

    international

    rbitration

    s a mean s o

    resolve ontrover-

    sy among hese

    tates nd investors

    omir-rgrom coult-

    tr ies

    that do

    not

    belong

    to MERCOSUR,

    but have

    investedn them.'We anconcludc,

    hen,

    hat not only n

    Chile, but

    also n Latin

    America n

    general

    here

    s

    a ten-

    dency

    to favor ir.rternational

    on'rmercial rbitration

    in

    essential

    atters uchas he

    resolution Fcontrove

    s1'

    ri -

    sing

    berween

    he foreign nvestorand

    the countt'y

    ccci-

    ving the

    nvestments

    n

    order

    o restrict

    ocal

    urisdict ion

    influence n areashat were radi tionallyunder he State

    jur i.sdict ion,

    nd to

    rely he resolution l t

    controvesl' on

    arbitration

    nstances,

    n

    some

    ases LltoltState

    ontrol

    o

    the

    extentof questioning

    f this shows deeper

    h.rng.

    n

    the

    basis f International

    Lalv in the matter, he

    wa.v hey

    had been

    raditionally

    eld in Latin Americatr ountries

    according

    o the Calvo doctrine,

    which establi,shedhat

    the disputcs

    elative

    o

    investments

    n

    r statecould

    onh'

    be

    resolved y the

    udicial

    organizations

    fsuch State.'

    '

    Blackby Nigel, //le arbitrtion according n Bildrerl Treariesof'

    inuertmelrt

    tnd F-rte linde treaties n

    [,atin Anterica, articlc publislred

    in

    rhe

    Itcrnatitn,tl

    Magazine ou Arbitration, N I

    June

    -

    Dic 2001, |)ogoti

    Colombi,

    egit Editorial, page

    7

    and

    follorving.

    'Grigera

    Naon,

    Horacio, Latin Anuic,tn Countrias as

    lntonttion't/

    Contercil

    Arbitnttion places, arriclc publishcd

    in

    Spacial Supplarntnt

    ot''

    httarntionl

    rbitrtion Court

    Bulletin 1C'(-', ages

    7

    on,

    1{)9i.

    2

    potr ivit

    creia, up

    o perioad

    e

    ,,acalmie"

    n carese

    desfoar

    egocieri sau/9i

    sunt

    incidente

    intervenlii

    l imitate ale nstangelor

    ocale,

    nvestitorii

    pot inigia,

    n

    mod direct,

    procedura

    arbitral

    mpotriva statului.

    Cele

    mai

    multe BIT-uri stabilesc

    procedura rbitral

    este

    guve

    nat

    de

    regulile

    gi

    reglementrile

    mise e

    Centrul

    Internagional

    pentru reglementarea

    iferendelor

    elative

    la

    investi i i

    ICSID),

    dac

    statele

    emnatare

    unt prgi

    la

    Convengia

    pentru

    reglementarea

    iferendelor

    elative

    la investigi intre state i persoane le altor state,1965,

    Convengia

    de

    la'W'ashington.

    Ca

    modalitate alternativ,

    alte

    BIT-uri stabilesc,

    e obicei,

    un alt

    tip de arbitraj

    instituionalizat

    de

    exemplu

    arbitrajul organizat

    su b

    ar-rspiciile

    amerei

    de Comerg

    nternagionala

    lCC)

    sa u

    un arbitraj

    ad hoc desf9urat

    ub

    egida Comisiei

    Na-

    tiLrnilorUnite

    pentru Dreptul

    Comercial

    nternaqional;

    in sl ir i t ,

    unele ratate

    gi

    acorduri

    permit

    investitorilor

    s

    apeleze

    a

    jurisdicgia

    nstangelor tatului

    pe

    teritoriul

    c:iruias-a

    ealizat nvestitia,

    a

    modalitatealternativ

    a

    arbi t ra i l

    in ternat ional . '

    Tendinla

    promovat de

    BIT-uri

    s-aextins

    a tratatele

    multilaterale a careau participatsau a careunelegri

    din

    America

    Latin ar plrtea

    participa,

    cum

    ar f i , de

    exemplu,

    NAFTA

    (capitolul

    1l) sau

    Protocolul

    cu pri-

    vire la promovarea

    i

    protejarea

    nvestigiilor

    din

    gri

    ce

    nu aparfin

    MERCOSUR,

    sau

    a

    ri le

    care,

    iind p4i

    aleTlatatului

    Asuncin

    cunoscutsub

    numelede

    MER-

    COSUR

    (Argentina,

    Brazllia,

    Paraguay

    qi

    Uruguay),

    consider

    c arbitrajul

    comercial

    este o modalitate

    de

    solutionare

    a lit igiilor

    dintre aceste

    tate

    gi

    investitor i

    care provin din

    gri

    ce

    nu aparlin

    MERCOSUR,

    da r

    care

    au efectuat

    nvestigiipe

    teritoriul

    acestora.

    Astfel,

    putem concluziona n Chile, dar Ei n AmericaLati-

    n: i ,exist,

    n

    general,

    un curentde

    favorizare

    arbitra-

    jr-rh,ri

    omercial

    internagional

    cu privire

    la aspectele

    esenqiale,

    um ar

    fi solugionarea

    itigiilor dintre

    nvesti-

    rorii strini

    qi

    ara

    pe teritoriul

    creia

    se efectueaz

    investigiile,

    n scopul

    restricionrii

    nfluengelor

    uris-

    dict i i lor

    locale

    n

    domenii

    aflate,

    n mod

    tradigional,

    sub

    urisdicia

    tatal,

    recum

    gi

    n scopul

    supunerii

    o-

    lugionri i

    acestora e ctre

    nstanle

    arbitrale.

    Faptul c

    in unele

    cazurisentingele

    rbitrale

    nu erau

    supuse

    on -

    trolului

    de

    regularitateexercitat

    de

    instangele tatale

    ne

    determin

    ne

    intrebm dac

    nu a intervenit

    o

    modi-

    f icarede substanl fundamentului dreptului nterna-

    gional

    cu privire

    la concepgia

    radiional

    din statele

    '

    nf""tUy

    Nigel, Thearbitration

    according

    o Bilateral

    Tieaties f

    inuestment and

    lree Trade treaties

    in Latin

    America, articol

    publicat

    in lnternational Magazine on

    Arbitration,

    1, iunie-decembrie

    2004,

    Bogo rCo lom b i ,

    Ed i ru raLeg i s , .

    17

    $ i

    u rm roa re le .

    Revista

    Romn de

    Arbitrai

  • 8/11/2019 8. ARBITRAJE.revista Romana de Arbitraje

    11/25

    Studii . rt icole,omentari i

    The

    Harmonization

    of

    International

    Trade

    Arbitration

    Law:

    The new

    chilean

    aw about arbitration

    In th e Chilean

    Juridical

    organization,

    nternational

    trade

    arbitration

    was

    not regulated

    nti l

    the

    recentLa w

    number

    19.971'was

    published

    n the

    off icial

    newspa-

    per

    on September

    9rh 2004.

    The existing

    egulatior.rs

    should

    be

    applied

    o the domestic

    arbitration

    as well,

    which

    were

    evidently

    inadequate

    or

    international

    con-

    f l icts

    when the

    arbitration

    was

    held

    in

    Chile.'The

    ne w

    Chilean International Commercial Arbitration La w

    integrates

    hile

    with the

    countries

    hat

    haveadopted

    n

    its

    international

    organization,

    he UNCITRAL

    Inter-

    national

    Arbitration

    Law of

    1985 as a

    responseo the

    modern

    tendency

    o the

    harmonization

    of

    the

    ]nterna-

    tional

    Commercial

    Arbitration

    l.aw.

    For the establishment

    f thc

    International

    Comme

    -

    cial

    ubiuation

    Model

    law, he United

    Nadons

    Commission

    for

    International

    Commercial

    Larv UNCITRAL

    issuecl

    a

    report

    about

    the possibie

    asPects

    ontained

    n this

    law.

    The preparation

    of the project

    was

    given

    to tts

    work

    team on

    International

    Contract

    Practice.

    Th e

    prof

    ect

    was approved

    with comments of the

    Governments

    and International

    Organiz.ations

    r-r he

    annual

    session

    985.u he

    tool chosen

    by UNCITRAL

    for the

    harmonization

    f the

    national

    awson commer-

    cial arbitration

    was

    a

    model

    law and

    not an

    International

    Convention

    because

    f

    the flexibiliry

    of

    model

    laws to

    be incorporated

    n the

    internal

    law of

    eachcountry

    and because

    hey

    also

    can be

    adopted

    n

    part

    or totall

    the original

    or

    with modificatiorrs.

    However

    keeping

    ts inspiration

    principles

    ntact so :rs

    to

    achive

    betteruniry

    of

    the

    law in the

    matter.On

    th e

    other hand, when these ools adopt the juridical form

    ofr

    International

    Conventions

    they

    do

    not have

    th c

    same

    lexibi l i ty

    because

    hey are

    subscribed,

    nd

    later

    ratified

    with

    reservations

    o the

    national

    egislation,

    nd

    for this

    reason he

    purposeof

    unity

    is not achivecl.

    n

    Comparative

    law, UNCITRAL

    has been a

    rnodel

    for

    new

    International

    Commercial

    Arbitration

    l-aws in

    '

    For the

    content of

    the new

    larv, see

    'rvw.bcn.cl

    t

    Recognized

    by

    the

    President

    of the countrv

    in his message

    at

    rhe beginning

    of the

    project of

    law on

    International

    Comercial

    Abitration,

    Bulletin

    No

    325-10.

    n'I-he

    general

    meeting of rhe

    Ur-rited

    Nations,

    resolurion

    40-72,

    Dic.

    11 i985,

    recommended

    ,,That

    all States iue

    due

    consideration

    to the

    Model

    Lata International

    Commercia/

    Arbitration

    upon desi/e-

    rable

    uniry

    of tbe

    latu on

    Arbitrl

    proceedings and

    tbe

    need

    fitr

    I n ern ation

    a Comm

    ercia

    Ar

    bi tra

    ti on

    P ac i ces

    .

    -

    Sandoval

    Lpez, Ricardo

    ,

    ,,El

    Arbitrale Conercil

    Intarnciott/

    "'

    Reuistde

    Darecho Llniuersidad

    de Chile,

    page 101 attd.fitrther,

    2000.

    Nr. 3

    (7)/lulie-Septembrie

    2008

    Americii

    Latine consacrat

    e doctrina

    Calvo,

    doctrin

    potrir,it

    careia

    it igi i le

    referitoare

    a investi l i i le

    efectuate

    pe

    teritoriul

    unui anumit

    stat pot

    fi soluionate

    umai

    de

    entit1ile

    usti l iei

    statale

    le acestuia

    in

    urm'.

    Armonizarea

    legislafiei

    din

    domeniul

    arbitrajului

    comercial

    nternafional:

    noua

    egechilian

    a

    abitrajului

    in sistemul

    udiciar

    chil ian,

    arbitra.iul

    omercial

    nter-

    nafionalnu a fost reglementatpn a publicarea ecen-

    tei

    ,egi

    nr. 19.9710

    n

    Jurnalul

    Oficial din

    29 septembrie

    2004.

    Reglementrile

    xistente

    se aplicau,

    in egal

    msur,

    qi

    arbitrajului

    ntern, ceea

    ce

    era, evident,

    ne-

    potrivit

    in l i t igi i le

    nternagionale,

    acarbitrajul

    se des-

    fgr-rra

    n Chrle'.

    Noua

    reglementare

    hilian

    cu privire

    a

    arbitrajul

    comercial

    nternagional

    al iniaz

    tatul

    Chile

    trilor

    ce au

    adoptat

    n cadrul

    organizagiei

    nternagionale

    in anul

    1985

    LegeaUNCITRAL

    cu

    privire

    a arbitrajul

    international

    a

    rspuns

    a tendina

    modern

    de armo-

    nizare

    legislal iei

    rbitrajului

    comercial

    nternaEional.

    (lu

    ocazia

    elaborrii

    Legii-Model

    referitoare

    a arbi-

    t ra ju l comercia l nternagional ,Comisia Na iuni lor

    Uni te

    pentru

    Dreptul

    Comergulu i

    Internal ional

    (UNCITRAL)

    a emis

    un

    raport

    cu privire

    la aspectele

    propuse

    a

    fi stipulate

    n

    conginutul

    acesteia.

    laborarea

    proiectului

    a

    fost

    incredingat

    grupului

    de

    lucru

    din

    cadrul

    Departamentului

    de

    Practic

    contractual

    nter-

    national.

    Proiectul

    a

    fost aprobat

    cu

    amendamentele

    guvernelor

    qi

    organizagiilor

    nternagionale

    a Sesiunea

    anual

    din

    1985'.

    Instrumentul

    ales

    de

    UNCITRAL

    pentrLl

    armonizarea

    reglementrilor

    naionale

    referi-

    toare

    a

    arbitrajul

    comercial

    a fost

    o

    Lege-Model,

    nu o

    convent ie internagional tt dator i t

    f lexib i l i tgi i

    includerii

    Legilor-Model

    n legislaiile

    nterne

    ale

    fie-

    crei

    gri,

    t

    gi

    datorit

    aptului

    c

    acestea

    ot

    fi adop-

    tate

    n form

    pargial

    au

    otal,

    n

    varianta

    nigial

    au

    cu

    modificri.

    '

    Grigera

    Naon,

    Horacio,

    I'atin

    American

    Counnies

    as

    Intentationa/

    Comercial

    rbitration

    places, rticol

    publicat

    n supli-

    mentul

    special

    l Buletinului

    Curii

    de

    Arbitraj de

    pe

    lngCCI'

    p.

    47 si

    urmtoarele,

    995.

    '

    Pentru

    coninutul

    noii legi,

    a se

    vedea

    wwwbcn.cl

    'Aspect

    recunoscut

    e preEedintele

    rii

    n punctul

    su

    de vedere

    exprimat

    a debutul

    procedurii

    de

    iniierea proiectului

    de

    legecu

    privire

    a arbitrajul

    comercial

    nternaional,

    uletinul

    M

    325-10

    " AdunareaGeneral NaqiunilorUnite, prin Rezoluia 0-72,

    Dic.

    11-1985,

    a recomandat

    ,Ca

    oate

    tatela

    d acorde

    mportana

    necesrlrd

    egii-Model

    cu

    priuire

    la arbitrajul

    comercial

    nternaional

    n

    scopul

    rert/izrlrii

    doritei

    uniformizdri

    a reglementdrilor

    referitoare a

    procedurile

    arbitrale,

    precum

    i

    n scopul

    asigurdrii

    unor practici

    n

    dr.,nt

    n

    u

    a b raj

    u ui com

    ercal inter

    naio

    a "'

  • 8/11/2019 8. ARBITRAJE.revista Romana de Arbitraje

    12/25

    Studii , rt icole,omentari i

    German

    Australia,

    Bahrein,

    Bermuda, Bulgaria,

    Ca -

    nada, Cyprus,

    Egypt, The United

    States

    California,

    Connecticut,

    Oregon

    and

    Texas), Cuatemala,

    Hong

    Kong,

    Hungar

    India, Iran,

    Ireland,Kenya,

    Lithuania,

    Macao,

    Malta,

    Mexico,

    New Zealand,

    Nigeria, Oman,

    Peru,

    The United

    Kingdom

    (Scotland),

    Russia,

    Singa-

    pore,

    Sri

    Lanka,

    Tunisia, Ucrania,

    Zimbabwe, and

    re-

    cently

    Spain.s/'

    The reasons or adopting the Model Law on

    International

    Commercial

    Arbitration

    are,

    n a wa the

    insuffency f

    the

    national awson arbitration

    o

    resolve

    International

    Commercial

    co

    n 'lict.s, nd the differences

    from

    country to

    country.

    At least one

    of the partics

    shallbe

    foreign

    o the countrv

    rvhere he arbirretiorl

    s

    held;

    even he arbitrator

    may be a foreigner

    and as a

    result,

    he parties

    and the arbitrator

    will be faced to

    rules

    and

    regulations hat

    are unknown

    to them.

    '

    About

    the

    history

    of the Chilean

    Law or-r

    nternational

    Commercial

    Arbitration,

    it is clear hat the

    mult ipl ica-

    tion of

    transactions

    ith an

    arbitral

    clausewas one of

    the main factors. he incentive or a trial in Chile, spc-

    cial ly

    relevant

    or

    small

    and

    medium sized

    companres,

    which

    find very expresive

    o

    litigate abroad,

    and the

    objective

    of

    making Chile

    an arbitration

    center,

    especial ly

    n

    Latin America."

    The

    most important

    advantages

    o adopt

    the

    Model

    Law by the Chilean

    legislation

    are the

    fol lowing:

    a) that

    it contributes

    o

    convey

    an

    image of

    seriousness

    nd reliabiliry

    o the

    country

    within the

    internationalbusiness

    nd

    judicial

    communit

    which carries

    udicial

    securitv

    or lnvestors

    and

    foreigncoLrnterparts;

    ) that

    Fostesorcign

    nve.st-

    ments;c) that creates

    jur idical

    system or the resolu-

    tion

    of

    international

    controversies

    mong

    privatc

    tco-

    ple

    n the setting

    of the

    Association

    greementbetween

    Chile

    and

    the European

    community

    and

    the United

    States

    f

    America;d) that

    creates n

    atmosphere

    f trust

    for Chi le

    to become

    the place

    for in ternat ional

    commercial

    arbitrations overcoming

    former deficien-

    cies;

    e) that

    contributes

    o the development

    nd

    perfec-

    tion of

    the

    International

    Commercial

    Arbitration

    services

    ffered by

    the chilean

    arbitration

    entities, and

    f) allows

    small and

    medium sized

    Chilean

    companies

    '

    For the neq'model aw seemvw.uncirral.org'

    For the

    New Arbitration

    Law

    in Spain,seeCordn

    Moreno,

    Faustino,

    ,El

    arbitaje

    de

    Derecho riuado".

    Brief Studyof

    l-au, 60-

    2003, on

    Arbitration.

    Editorial Aranzadi

    SA. Spain,2005.

    "'Sandoval,

    Ricado,

    page

    109.

    "

    Report

    rom the or eignallairs

    committee

    Session

    8,

    I 'lv18,

    2004.

    4

    Cu

    toate

    acestea,

    ste de dorit

    pstrarea

    ntact a

    principiilor

    de

    redactare

    n scopul

    realizri i

    unei uni-

    formizri a

    reglementrii

    din

    aceast

    materie.

    Pe de al t

    parte,

    in

    ipoteza n care

    aceste

    mijloace adopt

    forma

    juridic

    a conven(iilor

    nternalionale,

    espectiva

    orm

    nu are aceeagi

    lexibi l i tate

    deoarece

    unt semnate

    $i,

    ulterior,

    ratificate,

    cu rezerve

    a de

    legislagia

    a[ional,

    scopul

    uniformizrii

    nefiind

    atinsT.

    n dreptul

    com-

    parat,

    Legea-Model

    UNCITRAL

    a

    rePrezentat n

    reper

    pentru ultimele reglementri referitoare la arbitrajul

    comercia l

    in terna ional

    d in

    Germania,

    Austra l ia ,

    Bahrain,

    Bermude,

    Bulgaria,

    Canada,

    Cipru,

    Egipt,

    Statele

    Unite

    (California,

    Connecticut,

    Oregon

    gi

    'Iexas),

    Guatemala,

    Hong

    Kong, Ungaria,

    ndia,

    Iran,

    Irlanda,

    Kenya, Lituania,

    Macao,

    Malta,

    Mexic,

    Noua

    Zeeland,

    Nigeria,Oman,

    Peru,Regatul

    Unit

    (Scotia),

    Rusia,

    Singapore,

    Sr i

    Lanka,

    Tunis ia, Ucraina,

    Zimbabwe,

    i,

    recent,

    Spania.""

    Ratiunile

    elaborrii

    Legii-Model

    cu privire

    la arbi-

    trajul comercial

    internagional

    au

    fost determinate,

    intr-un

    fel, de

    caracterul

    lacunar

    al

    reglementrilor

    naionale eferitoarea procedurilearbitraleutilizate n

    soluionarea

    itigiilor

    comerciale

    nternagionale,

    recum

    qi

    de

    diferenlele

    dintre

    respectivele

    eglementri.

    Cel

    putin

    una

    dintre

    prgi

    va avea calitatea

    de

    ,,strin"

    n

    tara unde

    se va desfqura

    rbitrajul;

    chiar

    arbitrul

    poate

    fi

    strin,

    drept

    urmare

    prgile

    i

    arbitrul

    vor avea

    de-a

    face cu

    reguli

    gi

    reglementri

    necunoscute''.

    Cu

    privire

    la istoricul

    reglementrii

    chiliene

    referitoare

    a

    arbitrajul

    comercial

    nternalional,

    esteevident

    c nmulirea

    ran-

    zacti i lor

    continnd

    o clauz

    rbitral

    a

    fost unul

    dintre

    principalii

    factori ce a determinat

    elaborarea

    cesteia.

    'lbtodat,

    un

    alt

    factor este

    reprezentat

    att

    de

    incura-

    jarea

    prilor

    de

    a searbitra

    n

    Chile,

    n special

    ncura-

    jarea

    companiilor

    mici

    gi

    medii

    ce consider

    a fiind

    pcrtinent

    soluionarea

    itigiilor

    in strintate,

    t

    gi

    de

    obiectivul

    de

    a facedin

    Chile

    un centru

    al

    arbitrajului,

    in

    special

    n America

    Latin".

    Cele

    mai

    importante

    be-

    nefici i

    obginute a

    urmare

    a adoptrii

    principiilor

    Legii-

    Model

    UNCITRAL

    de

    ctre

    egislaia

    hilian

    sunt ur-

    mtoarele:

    a) contribuie

    la crearea

    unei

    imagini

    de

    -

    Sandoval

    Lpez,

    Ricardo,

    El ArbitrQe

    Comercial

    nternacional,

    Reuita de

    Derecho

    Llniuersidad

    e Chik,

    p. l0I

    i

    urm.'

    2000.

    t

    Pentrunoua ,ege-Model,

    se

    vedeawww.uncitral.org

    "

    Pentru

    noua lege a

    arbitrajului

    spaniol,

    a se

    vedea

    Cordn

    Moreno,

    Faustino,

    El arbitmje

    de

    Derecho

    riuado, Scurtd

    Analizd

    a

    Legii arbitrajului

    60-2003,

    Editura Aranzadi

    SA' Spania,

    2005'

    "'

    Sandoval,

    ucardo,

    p.

    109.

    '

    Raportal Comitetului

    Afacerilor

    Externe,Sesiunea

    8,

    8

    mai

    2004.

    Revista

    Romn

    de

    Arbitrai

  • 8/11/2019 8. ARBITRAJE.revista Romana de Arbitraje

    13/25

    Studii ,

    rt icole,

    omentari i

    (PYMES)

    celebrating

    ontracts

    with foreign countcr-

    parts to

    make use

    of International

    Arbitratiott

    in

    Chi le. ' '

    The

    new Chilean

    Law on

    InternationalCommercial

    Arbitration,

    according

    o the objective

    of

    International

    Unity

    in arbitration

    regulation, does

    not differ

    in

    gene-

    ral

    from the Model

    Law UNCITRAL

    aswe

    are

    goirrg

    o

    see.' '

    he countries

    nder the

    ,,Common

    Law" were he

    first ones o

    adopt the

    Model

    Larv

    but

    today both

    the

    countriesunder the .,Common Law" and undcr thc

    ,,Civil

    Law",

    haveequally

    adopted he

    Model Law,

    whiclr

    appears

    o

    be a remarkable

    act, F we

    consider hat thc

    Model

    Law contains

    several rinciples

    hat correspond

    more [o t he

    ,,Civi l

    Law"

    arbitral

    system

    athcr han

    th c

    one

    adopted

    by the Common

    Law. For example,

    when

    reFering

    o tl 're

    rbitrators s

    he

    ,,/ /equo

    t bono'n'

    Main aspects

    in

    the

    New Chi lean

    Law

    on

    lnternationalommercial

    rbitration

    We are going

    to analize

    he special

    system or

    inter-

    national commercialarbitration in Chile, applications

    in terms

    of territory

    principles,

    he autonomy

    of wil l ol:

    the parties,

    he arbitration

    agreement,

    he

    compositiotr

    of the

    Arbitral

    Court, the

    competence

    of the arbitral

    court,

    limited

    jLrdicial ization

    n relation to

    judicial

    in-

    terference

    nd

    arbitrator's

    owers,

    he applicable

    aw in

    the

    arbitration,

    precausion

    measures,

    he annulment

    re -

    source,

    nd

    recoqnitionand

    execution f

    arbitral

    award.

    The new Chilean

    Law

    19.971 applies

    only to

    International

    Commercial

    Arbitration,

    and

    it

    does

    no t

    affect

    any of

    the international

    reaties

    n

    force, either

    bilateral

    or

    multilateral.

    The

    new

    Chilean

    Larv on

    ''

    Urrejola Monckeberg,

    Sergio

    ,,Chile

    debe

    contar con una

    /e1' e

    Arbitmje

    Internacional",

    article published

    in rhe

    Juridical

    Bullatin

    No

    6,

    Justice

    Ministrl, Sept.

    2004, pages

    109 and following.

    'r

    In mosr

    Latin American countries

    the

    Model Law

    has

    been

    adopted

    practically

    in a block.

    That is the case

    o[Bolivia, Costa

    Rica,

    Guatemala,

    Honduras,

    Mexico,

    Panama,

    Paraguay,

    Peru

    n d

    Venezuelr,o

    name a few.

    However, in the case

    of Brazil, Colombia

    and

    llcuador, the

    law has

    not

    been

    completely

    adopted.

    'o

    Sanders

    Pieter,

    ,,Llnity

    and

    Diuersiry, in rhe

    Aloption of' the

    model

    u", art ic le

    publ ished

    in

    Arbitret ion

    Internat ional,

    r 'o iume

    11 #1

    LCIA 1991. For information

    abor-r t

    egis lat ive istor-v f rhe

    Model

    l,aw

    and

    its articles, see

    ,A

    guide

    ro tle UNCITRAL

    Modtl

    Lau on

    Internationl Commercia/

    Arbitration'\

    Kluwer 1989, authors

    Holtzmann

    and Neuhrus.

    Nr. 3

    (7)/Iulie-Septembrie

    2OO8

    seriozitate

    i

    de

    incredere

    a

    grii

    n contextul

    mediului

    internagional e

    afaceri

    i

    al comunitgii

    uridice,

    aspect

    ce confer

    sigurang

    uridic

    investitorilor

    gi

    partene-

    rilor strini;

    b)

    incurajeaz

    nvestigiile

    trine;

    )

    creeaz

    un sistem

    udiciar

    pentru

    solugionarea

    einlelegerilor

    internagionale

    intre

    entitlii private

    prin

    mecanismul

    stabilir ii

    Acordului

    de

    Asociere intre

    Chile,

    Comuni-

    tatea

    European

    qi

    Statele

    Unite

    ale Americii;

    d)

    creeaz

    un

    climat

    de incredere

    entru

    ca Chile

    sdevin

    un

    loc

    al arbitrajului comercial internaional, dep9indu-se

    astfel

    echile

    acune;e)

    contribuie

    a dezvoltarea

    i

    per-

    fe ionarea

    serviciilor

    de

    arbitraj comercial

    interna-

    t ional

    fi-rrnizate e

    instituqii le

    arbitrale

    din

    Chile,

    9i

    f)

    permite

    companiilor

    mici

    qi

    mij loci i

    ce au ncheiat

    con-

    tracte

    cu entitgi

    trine

    s stipuleze

    lauze

    ompromi-

    sori i

    stabilind

    ocul arbitrajului

    nternagional

    n

    Chile' ' .

    Noua lege

    chil iancu

    privire

    a arbitrajul

    comercial

    international,

    n concordan

    cu

    obiectivul

    unitgii

    internaionale

    reglementrilor

    rbitrale,

    nu

    difer,

    n

    general,

    e

    Legea-Model

    UNICTRAL,

    astfel

    um vom

    vedea

    n celece urmeaz'r.

    rile din

    sistemul

    ommon

    /aw au fost primele care au adoptat Legea-Model,dar

    astzi

    att

    trile

    din sistemul

    czmmzn

    kw, ct

    9i

    garile

    din

    sistemul

    ciuil law

    au

    adoptat-o,

    in egal

    msur,

    fapt

    remarcabil dac

    avem

    in

    vedere c

    Legea-Model

    con[ine

    cteva

    rincipi i

    ce corespund,

    mai degrab,

    is-

    temului

    arbitral

    caracteristic

    sistemului

    ciuil

    law decit

    sistemului

    common aw.

    De exemPlu,

    principiul

    referi-

    tor

    la prerogativa

    rbitrilor

    de

    a statua

    ,aequo

    t bzno"ta.

    Pr incipale le specte

    din noua

    lege chi l ian

    referitoare

    a arbitrajul

    omercial

    nternational

    Vom analiza

    reglementarea

    chilian a

    arbitrajului

    comercial

    nternalional,

    n special

    aspectele

    eferitoare

    la

    aplicarea

    rincipiilor

    teritoriale,

    autonomia

    voinei

    pargilor,

    onvenlia

    arbitral,

    compunerea

    iibunalului

    arbitral,

    competen[a

    nstanqei

    rbitrale,

    imitele

    udicia-

    "

    Urr.;ol"

    Monckeberg,

    ergio,

    Chile

    ebe ontar

    onuna

    ry dt

    Arbitraje

    nternacional,

    rricol ublicat

    n Buletinul

    uridic

    No 6,Mi-

    nisterulJustiiei,

    ept.2004,

    .

    109

    qi

    urmtoarele.

    ''

    in rnajoritata

    rilor

    in

    America

    atin,

    egea-Model

    fost

    adoptat,

    ractic,

    n bloc.

    Este

    orbadespre

    olivia,

    Costa

    uca,

    Ciuatemala,

    onduras,

    Mexic,

    Panama,

    aragua

    Peru

    qi

    Venezuela,

    penrru a

    nominali ta

    doar

    cteva.

    Totugi, in

    cazul

    Brazi l iei,

    Columbieigi Ecuadorului,egea u a fost adoptatn integralirate.

    ''

    Sanders

    Pieter, Unity

    and Diuersi7,

    n the

    Adopion

    of theModel

    Lau arricol oublicat

    i Arbitration

    International,

    uol.

    11 #1 LCIA

    1995.Pentru

    nformaEiiu privire

    a storicul

    egi i-Model,

    nclusiv

    al aricolelor

    sale,a se

    vedea

    A

    guide

    to the

    UNCITRAL

    Modl

    Law

    ort

    lnternational Commercial

    Arbitration,

    Kluwer

    1989, tutori

    Holtzmann

    si Neuhaus.

  • 8/11/2019 8. ARBITRAJE.revista Romana de Arbitraje

    14/25

    Studii , rt icole,omentari i

    Arbitration,

    as

    well as he Colombian

    Law differ

    from

    other

    arbitration

    laws that also

    foilow the

    modcl of

    UNCITRAL.

    It appliesnot

    only to

    local arbitration,

    but

    also

    o international

    arbitration,

    which is calleda

    Mor-ro

    onception.

    t is

    included, among

    others,

    n

    th e

    arbitration

    legislat ions

    of Germany't

    Mexico'n and

    Spain.'t

    The concepts

    f

    ,,international"

    nd

    ,,commer-

    cial"

    are essential

    o understand

    the UNCITRAL

    ModelLaw.

    According o article

    1

    No

    3

    in t he Chilean

    Law, an arbitration s international f: a) The parties o

    an

    arbitration

    agreement

    ave,at

    the time of

    the con-

    clusion

    of that agreement,

    heir

    places

    of busilress

    n

    diffcrent

    States;

    r b) One

    of the

    following pl:rccs

    s

    situated

    utside

    he State

    n which

    the parties

    have heir

    places

    f business:

    i)

    The placeof

    arbitration

    f deter-

    rnined

    n,

    or

    pursuant

    o, the arbitration

    agreement;

    i i)

    Any place

    wherea substancial

    art of

    the obligations

    f

    the

    commercial

    elationship

    s to

    be performed

    or the

    place

    with

    which the subject-matter

    f the dispute

    s

    most closely

    onnected;

    r c)

    The parties

    haveexpressly

    agreed

    hat the

    subject

    matter of the

    arbitration

    agree-

    ment relateso more than one country.

    If a parry

    has more than

    one place

    of business,

    l're

    placeof

    business

    s that

    which

    has

    he

    closest

    elation-

    ship

    to the

    arbitration agreement;

    nd

    if

    a party

    does

    not havea

    placeof business,

    efere ce s to be

    made o

    his

    habitual

    residence.

    article

    1 No 4). In

    relation to

    the

    concept

    of

    ,,commercial"

    he Chilean

    Law states

    n

    its Article

    2, g:The

    term

    ,,commercial"

    should

    be givcn

    a

    wide interpretation

    o as

    o cover

    mattersarising

    iont

    a l l

    re lat ionships

    f a commercia l

    ature,

    whethercon-

    tractual

    or

    not. Relationships

    of commercial

    natrre

    include, but are not limited to, the fol lowing transac-

    t ions:

    any

    tade ransaction

    or

    the sup ply or

    exchange

    of goods

    or servi ces; istribution

    agreement;

    omme

    -

    ' '

    The German

    Arbitral Law can

    bc appl ied

    not only to

    Inter-

    nar ional Commercial

    Arbi trat ion; but also

    to local arbi trat ion

    en d

    non comrnercial

    matters

    n Germany.

    For nrorc

    infornt l t io l t , scc ar-

    cle

    The hdrmonization

    of the lau,

    in

    International Commercial

    Arbitration

    kw by professor

    Miguel

    Checa Martnez,

    Reuist dc la

    Corte

    Esp,itola de

    Arbitntje,

    1998,

    pages 353

    and

    follorvrng.

    "'

    Arbitration

    Law

    1993. Article by Rodrguez

    Diaz, Manuel.

    ,,7

    desarrollo

    del Arbitraje

    Comercial en

    las ltimas dcadas

    en

    Mlxito"

    Reuista

    bero,tmericana

    de

    Arbitraje, Ma1,

    2001.

    '

    Rule

    Number 60-2003,

    December

    2003, appl icd to

    local ancj

    internat ional

    rbi t rat ion.

    For

    compari .sons

    crween hc

    Splnish Ll* '

    and

    thc Chilean

    Law, see

    Biggs, Gonzalo,

    ,,Breakthrough.fr

    nrernario'

    ntl

    Contrncrcial

    Arbittiott

    in Clih" publishccl

    in Disputt

    Rsolutior

    Journal,

    uolume

    59

    # t, Feb.-April 200'1,

    ptges

    (r5

    and

    fbllowing.

    r)

    re ale

    controlului

    exercitat

    de

    instanga

    tatal,

    preroga-

    t ivele

    arbitrului,

    legea

    aplicabila

    arbitrajului,

    msurile

    asigurtorii,

    motivelede

    anulare

    sentin{ei

    rbitrale,

    e-

    cunoa$terea

    i

    executarea

    nei

    sentinge

    rbitrale.

    1.

    -

    Arbitraiul Comercial

    Internafional

    in Chile

    Noua ege hilian

    nr. 19.971se

    plic

    numai arbitra-

    jului

    comercial

    nternagional,

    i

    nu prejudiciaz

    plicarea

    niciunui tratat internationalbilateralsaumultilateral n

    vigoare.Noua

    legechil ian

    a arbitrajului,

    a

    fel ca egea

    colunrbian,

    on(ine

    eglementri

    iferite

    ade

    alte

    e-

    glcmentri

    arbitralc

    nspirate

    de

    modelul

    UNCITRAf.

    Aceasta e

    aplicnu

    numai

    itigiilor arbitrale

    nterne, t

    si

    lit igiilor arbitrale

    nternaionale,

    eea

    ce

    inseamn

    adoptarea

    r.rei

    oncepli i

    moniste.

    Aceast

    oncepIie

    st e

    adoptat

    e diverse

    egislagii ,

    rintre

    care, e

    exemplu,

    e

    lcgisla ia

    rbitral in

    Germania'5,

    exic'u

    i

    Spania''.

    ( lonce

    ptele

    ,,internaional"

    gi

    ,,comercial"

    sunt

    esenfiale

    entru a

    ingelege

    egea-Model

    UNCITRAL.

    Potrivit

    art.

    1 paragraful

    l treilea

    din

    legea hilian,

    un

    arbitrajeste nternalionaldac:a) prgilea o convengie

    arbitral

    au,

    in

    momentul

    incheierii

    conveniei,

    ediul

    principal

    pe

    teritoriul

    unor

    statediferite;

    sau b) unul

    din urmtoarele

    ocuri

    estesituat

    n afarastatului

    pe te-

    ritoriul cruia

    p4ile

    gi-au

    stabilit

    sediul principal:

    (i )

    locul

    arbitrajului,

    astfel

    determinat,

    saudeterminat

    n

    conformitate

    cu prevederile

    convengiei

    arbitrale;

    (ii)

    orice

    loc in care urmeaz

    s

    fie executate,

    n proporqie

    substanial,

    bl igai i le

    contractuale

    au

    locul cu care

    obiectul

    itigiului prezint

    egturile

    cele

    mai strnse;

    sau

    c) prgile

    au convenit,

    n mod

    expres'

    obiectul

    conventiei rbitraleprezint

    egturicu

    mai

    multe

    ri.

    I)ac o parte

    are

    mai

    multe sedii

    principale,

    e

    a in

    considerare

    ediul

    care

    are cea

    mai strns

    egtur

    cu

    convenfia

    rbitral,

    ar dac

    o

    Parte

    nu are

    niciun

    sediu

    rrrincipal,

    se ia

    in

    considerare

    ediul

    secundar

    art.

    1

    paragraful

    ). in ceea

    e

    privegte

    onceptul

    ,comercial",

    -'

    kg.,

    arbitral erman

    e

    poate plica

    u numai rbitrajului

    comerci:rl

    nternaional,

    dar

    5i

    arbitrajului

    intern,

    respectiv

    aspectelor

    ecomerciale.

    entru

    mai multe

    detalii,a

    se

    vedea rti-

    colul

    'l'he

    harmonization

    of the

    kw in

    International

    Commercial

    Arbitration

    law,

    scrisde profesorul

    Miguel Checa

    Marrez,

    Reuista

    dc

    Lt Corte

    Espanola

    eArbitraje,

    1998, p.353

    i

    urmtoarele.

    "'

    Arbitration

    Law

    1993. A se

    vedea

    Rodrguez

    Diaz,

    Manuel,

    6l

    desarrol/o elArbitmje Comercialen las ttimasdcadaenMxico, in

    Reuista

    bcroamericana

    eArbitaje,

    ma 200L.

    -

    Regula

    r. 60-2003,

    decembrie

    2003 aplicabili

    arbitrajului

    irrtern

    i

    international.

    enrru omparai i

    ntre egea

    paniol

    i

    egea

    chilian,

    a se

    vedea

    Biggs,Gonzalo,

    Breakthrough

    or

    Internarional

    Contrtercil

    Arbirration in

    Chile,

    in

    Dispure Resolurion

    ournal'

    vol.

    9

    #

    1,

    eb.-apr. 004,p.65

    qi

    urmtoarele'

    Revista

    Romn de

    Arbitrai

  • 8/11/2019 8. ARBITRAJE.revista Romana de Arbitraje

    15/25

    Studi i ,art icole, omentanl

    cial

    representation

    r

    agency;

    actoring;

    easing;con-

    struction

    of

    works; consulting;

    engineering;

    icensing;

    investment;

    inancing;banking;

    nsurance; xploatation

    agreement

    r concession;

    oint

    ventureand other

    forms

    ofindustr ial

    or business

    o-operationr

    arriagc

    fgoods

    or

    passengers

    y air,

    sea, ail

    or road."'o

    As the above

    article

    make.s lear, he

    word

    ,,commercial"

    .sed

    y the

    law is

    much broader than

    the

    term

    ,,commerce"

    n

    Article

    3'd

    from

    the Chilean

    Commerciai

    Codc.

    2.

    -

    Scopeof

    application:

    Tbrritorial

    principle

    The Chilean

    Law on

    International

    Clommercial

    Arbitration,

    with someexceptior.rs,

    an be applied

    onlv

    ift the

    place

    of arbitration

    is in the

    natior-ralerrit,rrt '

    (ar t ic le

    No

    2). ' " ' fhe terr i tor ia l

    r incip le

    hasbecn

    rr

    the Chilean

    aw for a

    long time.

    The Civi l

    Law states

    that

    the

    law

    is

    binding

    for

    al l the

    inhabitants

    of

    th e

    State,

    ncluding

    foreigners

    article

    14).

    Article

    16

    savs

    that the goods

    located

    in Chile are

    subject to

    th e

    Chilean

    Law' even

    when

    their owners

    are

    oreignersand

    do

    not reside n Chile.

    3.

    -

    Autonom)'

    of wil l

    of the parties

    The Chi lean

    Law on

    lnternat ional

    Commercia l

    Arbitration

    akes

    he principle

    of autonomy

    of wil l of the

    parties

    n terms

    of either he

    applicable

    aw or th e pro-

    cedure

    arv.

    In Fact,

    here are

    few

    regulations

    hat are

    binding

    so rhe parties

    ar.r hvays

    stablish

    ules hat are

    different

    rom the

    Law.The arbitral

    ribunal

    shalldccidc

    the dispute

    n

    accordance

    ith such

    rules of

    law as are

    chosenby the partiesas applicable o the sub.stancef

    the

    dispute.

    article

    28

    No 1).

    In

    the procedural

    spect,

    the

    parties

    are

    free to agree

    on the proccdure

    o

    be

    fol lowedby

    the

    Arbitral Ti' ibunal

    article

    19

    Nu1). Thc

    parties

    an even

    create

    he regulations

    nd

    rulesof

    the

    procedure,

    ut

    this

    s not very common.

    The usual

    wa y

    is

    that the

    oarties

    nclude a

    number of

    rules for the

    ' ' ' l 'his

    long transcription

    is contained

    in a page

    foot

    ltrom

    article

    first

    of the

    Model Law.

    Many countries,

    when adopting

    the

    Model

    Law,

    have incorporated

    this nore

    in the text, as

    in the

    Province of

    Bri t ish Columbia

    in Canada,

    n

    Cyprus,

    Egypt, Niger ia; Scot lancl ,

    Ucrania,

    etc. .

    "

    The exceptions o the

    territorial

    :rpplication ofrhe

    law are sta-

    ted

    in Articles 8 nd 9

    relering to rhe

    recognirion of arbitrrlar.vards

    not

    withstanding tl-re arbitrarion

    place,

    the larv tht

    the arvirrcl

    s

    based

    on or the arbi tral

    agreement.

    Art ic le

    35

    and

    36

    about

    recog-

    ni t ion and enlorcemenr

    of awards are appl ied,

    i rrespect ive f the

    Counrry

    in

    wich it rvas made.

    Nr. 3

    (7)/lulie-Septembrie

    2008

    legea

    hilian

    prevede

    n articolul

    2litera g urmtoarele:

    acest

    ermen

    se impune

    a

    fi interpretat

    flexibil, astfel

    inct

    s-i

    fie

    subsumate

    aspectele

    ecurgnd

    din

    rapor-

    turile

    juridice

    comerciale,

    ndiferent

    de caracterul

    con-

    tractual

    sau

    necontractual.

    Contractele

    comerciale

    n-

    clud, dar

    nu

    se

    imiteaz

    a urmtoarele

    ranzaclii:

    orice

    tranzactie

    comercial

    avnd

    ca obiect

    furnizarea

    sau

    schimbul

    de bunuri

    $i

    servicii;

    acorduri

    de

    distribuie;

    mandat

    comercial

    sau

    agenfie

    comercial;

    factoring;

    leasing; ontractede antrepriz; onsultan ; sisten

    tehnic;

    icenge;

    nvestiii;

    inangri;

    act ivitf i

    bancare;

    asigurri;

    corduri

    sau

    concesiuni

    de

    exploatare;

    oint

    \enture

    au alte

    forme

    de cooperare

    ndustrial

    au de

    afaceri;

    ransportul

    de bunuri

    sau

    pasageri

    e

    caleaae-

    rulr-ri, pei,

    ci

    featesau

    gosele"'t.

    stfel

    cum

    stabile;te

    articolul

    de

    mai sus, uvntul

    ,comercial"

    t i l izat

    de

    e-

    ge

    are o

    sferde

    aplicare

    mult

    mai

    larg dect

    ermenul

    ,,comert"

    utilizat de

    3

    C.comercial

    hi l ian.

    2.

    -

    Domeniu

    de

    aplicare:

    principiul

    teritorialitlii

    Legeachil ianreferitoarea arbitrajulcomercial n-

    ternalional,

    cu unele

    excepgii,

    oate

    fi aplicat

    numai

    dac

    ocul

    arbitrajului

    estesituat

    pe

    teritoriul

    nagional

    (art.

    1 N"

    2)''. Principiul

    eritorialitEii

    existat

    n legis-

    lat ia Chile

    de

    rnult

    vreme.

    Potrivit

    sistemulului

    izil

    ldw,

    legeaeste

    obligatorie

    pentru

    toEi

    ocuitorii

    statului,

    inclusiv

    pentru

    strini

    art.

    14).

    Art. 16 stipuleaz

    bu-

    nuri le

    situate

    pe teritoriul

    statului

    Chile

    sunt guvernate

    de

    legeachil ian

    chiar

    dac

    proprietarii

    acestora

    un t

    cetteni

    trini

    5i

    nu

    $i-au

    stabil i t

    egedinla

    n Chile.

    3.

    -

    Autonomia voinfei Prilor

    Legea

    hilian

    cu privire

    a arbitrajul

    comercial

    nter-

    nalional aplic

    principiul

    autonomiei

    voingei

    prgilor

    att

    cu privire

    la determinarea

    egii aplicabile

    ondului

    i i t igiului,

    ct

    i

    cu privire

    a determinarea

    egii aplicabile

    procedurii

    arbitrale.

    De fapt,

    exist

    doar

    cteva

    egle-

    ' ' '

    Aceast

    enumerare

    este

    cuprins

    intr-o

    not de subsol

    a primu-

    lui articol

    din

    Legea-Model.

    La data

    adoptrii

    Legii-Model

    multe

    tirri

    au

    incorporat aceast

    not

    in text,

    astfel cum

    se

    observ

    la

    Provincia

    Colr.rmbia

    Britanic

    din Canada,

    Cipru,

    [,gipt, Nigeria'

    Scotia.

    Ucrair-ra

    tc .

    "'

    Bxcepi i le pl icr i i

    er i tor ia le

    ale egi i sunt stabi l i tede art . 8 qi

    9

    referiroare

    :r

    recunoaqterea

    enrinelor

    arbirrale

    Fra

    tne

    seama

    cle

    locul arbirrajului,

    astfel

    c legea

    statueaz

    asupra

    faptului c

    senrinta

    se undamenteaz.

    e

    convenia

    arbitral.

    Art'

    35

    9i

    36

    refe'

    r i torc

    la recunoa$terea

    i

    executarea

    ent ingelor

    rbi t rale

    sunt

    apl i -

    cabi le

    ndiferent

    de

    ara

    n

    care

    au

    lost pronungare.

  • 8/11/2019 8. ARBITRAJE.revista Romana de Arbitraje

    16/25

    Studii . rt icole,omentari i

    arbitration,

    ike UNCITRAL,

    either

    in ad hoc

    Arbi-

    tration

    or

    in Institutional

    arbitration.

    They

    can also

    complement

    he

    unity

    ruleswith

    other

    rules hat

    havea

    wider

    scope

    or

    that may

    adapt better

    to

    the specif ic

    circumstances.

    o

    Most

    procedural

    legislat ions

    n Latin

    America,

    except

    n fe w cases

    here

    he procedural

    public

    legisla-

    t ion

    of the

    placedoes

    not

    al low

    t, authorize

    he parties

    to disrcgard

    some procedural

    ways or to

    replace hem

    for others.' 'As for the applicationof UNCITRAL restt-

    lat ions

    on arbitration,

    hey

    were adopted

    by

    tl-reUrrited

    Nations

    Committee

    for lt-rternational

    ommerce

    Larv

    in

    April \976,

    wirh the purposc

    of

    providing

    a mode

    n

    set

    of contract

    rules applicable

    o

    arbitration

    ad-hoc.

    The basic

    principles

    f these

    egulations

    re :

    a)The prevailing

    f proceeding

    egulations.

    o State

    would be

    wil l ing

    to accept

    he

    resultof an

    arbitratiolr

    proccss

    eld n i ts

    erritory

    or

    undcr

    its .aws,

    f

    the arbi-

    trators

    violate

    he

    regulat ions f

    the proceedings.t '

    b)

    The optionality

    of

    the tribunal

    in the procce-

    dings,

    given

    that

    the parties

    are

    equally treated,

    and

    having the opportuniry to state their caseat any time

    during

    the process.'l

    The regulations

    of UNCITRAL

    can

    be freely

    mo-

    dif ied

    by the

    parties,

    xpressed

    n Anicle

    l If the par-

    t ies

    have

    not selected set

    of

    rules tr the

    arbitration,

    the UNCITRAL

    Model

    Law contains

    elemental

    ules

    that are

    nor

    binding,

    thus applied

    n

    silence

    f the

    li t i-

    gators,

    which

    cover

    from the beginning,

    to the

    pro-

    ceedings,

    nti l

    the arbitral

    award.

    The Arbitral

    Tribun:rl

    ma subject

    o

    the provision

    of these

    ule.s,

    onduct he

    arbitration

    n such

    manner as

    it considers

    ppropiate'

    determining he admissibiliry elevance, nd materiali-

    ty and

    weight

    of any

    evidencc

    article

    19 Nn2 of

    the

    Chilean

    Law).

    The

    latter enables

    he

    Arbitral li ibunal

    to conduct

    the arbitration

    n a