a first look of the 10” high qe pmt shigeru yoshida for yuusuke hasegawa and mina inaba dep. of...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
213 views
TRANSCRIPT
A first look of the 10” High QE PMT
Shigeru Yoshida forYuusuke Hasegawa and Mina Inaba
Dep. of Physics, Chiba University
“Super Bialkali” photocathode
DOM
Reference PMT Absolutely calibrated
NDfilterLED
Slit 1mm
X-stage
QE×CE Absolute calibration
Systematic error ~7% @ room
Photocathode calibration
Reflectivity : 14.5%±0.73Transmission : 50.7%±2.54
LED
motor
PMT
17.8%
18.1% 15.5%
16.0% 18.7%
15.0% 16.7%
17.9%
TA1895 TA2026
TA2086 TA2146 TA2182
TA2259 TA2349
TA2374
Systematic error ~ 8%
20
0-0.15m 0.15m
@337nm
2D QE x CE Map of PMT
70nsec
CAMACCAMACCrate
ControllerCrate
Controller
ADCADC
GP-IBGP-IBFunction
GeneratorFunction
Generator
NIMNIM
PCI CardPCI CardCAMAC
InterfaceCAMAC
Interface
GP-IBInterfaceGP-IB
Interface
GateGenerator
GateGenerator
LinuxPCSync.Sync.
PMTPMT
Freezer(-35℃)
Gate
Signal
DiscriminatorDiscriminator
TTL-NIM ConverterTTL-NIM Converter
2kHz, ~0.01 photo-electron/shot
4~6nsec
375 nmUV LED
diffuser
~100ns
The Test bench
Freezer -35℃
The Test Bench
Diffuser attached to the UV LED
375nmUV LED
In the Freezer box
2kHz, ~0.01 photo-electron/shot
The IceCube PMT charge response
Average over 118 PMTs
One measurement
Peak of gaussian Peak of gaussian ~ 1 p.e.~ 1 p.e.
Charge resolution 29%
Mean 15% lessMean 15% less
Summary
• QE ~ 35 % @ 365 nm (IceCube PMT – 25%)• Charge response, cathode uniformity compar
able with the IceCube PMTs
– P/V is even better.• Dark Rate ~ 1kHz @ -35 C
(IceCube PMT ~ 600Hz)
18.3%16.3%
16.4%15.4%
11.3%10.4%
4.88%3.96%
Keno_Inuzaka(TA1056) Daikaku_Inumura(TA1176)
16.6%15.7%
15.0%12.5%
10.6%9.70%
4.69%4.30%
16.0%13.3%
13.2%14.2%
9.14%8.93%
4.23%3.74%
Red : measured at 24℃Blue : measured at -32℃
QE measured at -32℃ tend to 5~10% lowerlower than measured at 24℃However, they agree within the systematic error.
Sosuke_Inukawa(TA1181)
Absolute QE