See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283014310

A Prospective, Multicentered Study to Assess Social Adjustment in

Patients With an Intestinal Stoma in Turkey

Article  in  Ostomy/wound management · October 2015

CITATION

1

12 authors, including:

Ayise Karadag

Gazi University

26 PUBLICATIONS   398 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Hatice Karabulut

Nuh Naci Yazgan Üniversitesi

8 PUBLICATIONS   46 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Zehra Gocmen Baykara

Gazi University

12 PUBLICATIONS   58 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Deniz Harputlu

Izmir University of Economics

8 PUBLICATIONS   26 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Hatice Karabulut on 09 November 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

16 OSTOMY WOUND MANAGEMENT® OCTOBER 2015 www.o-wm.com

FEATURE

A Prospective, Multicentered Study to Assess Social Adjustment in Patients With an Intestinal Stoma in Turkey Ayişe Karadağ, RN, PhD; Hatice Karabulut, RN, PhD; Zehra G. Baykara, RN, PhD; Deniz Harputlu, RN, PhD; Eylem Toyluk, RN, ET Nurse; Birgül Ulusoy, RN, ET Nurse; Sercan Karadağ, RN, ET Nurse; Aysel Kahraman, RN, ET Nurse; Aysel Ören Hin, RN, ET Nurse; Meral Altinsoy, RN, ET Nurse; Yasemin Akıl, RN, ET Nurse; and Sezai Leventoğlu, Surgeon, Associate Professor

AbstractPatients with a stoma undergo physiological, psychological, and social adjustment to their new life situation. A descrip-tive, prospective study was conducted to assess adaptation among patients >18 years of age with a new temporary or permanent colostomy or ileostomy living in Turkey and receiving care at a participating stomatherapy unit. The study took place between September 1, 2011, and September 1, 2012. During hospitalization and following discharge, patients with a stoma received training and counseling according to their individual characteristics and their physiological, psycho-logical, and social needs. Each participant completed the 19-item “Identification Form for Patients with a Stoma” at the beginning of the study to document sociodemographic and stoma characteristics. To assess adjustment to the stoma, The Ostomy Assessment Inventory (OAI-23) was administered 2 times — the first within 1 month and the second within 6 months after surgery or when a temporary stoma was closed (whichever came first). This instrument comprised 23 items regarding adaptation to the stoma using Likert-type response options (0–4 range). Total scores ranged from 10 to 92, with higher scores indicating better adjustment. The instruments were completed by stoma and wound care nurses dur-ing face-to-face interviews. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and Wilcoxon tests. Of the 135 participants, the majority (77, 57.0%) were male; 73 (54.1%) had a colostomy, and 106 (78.5%) had a temporary stoma. The primary reason for stoma creation was cancer (89, 65.9%). Mean total OAI-23 scores were 48.63 ± 13.75 at the first administration and 50.59 ± 13.89 for the second. In terms of sociodemographic factors, significant increases in mean scores from the first to the second survey time were noted among patients in the 50–69 age group, women, married persons, and unemployed persons (P <0.05). With regard to stoma characteristics, the OAI-23 scores of patients with planned stoma operations and persons with permanent stomas increased significantly (P <0.05) between assessments. Significant increases in OAI-23 scores also were noted among persons who did not receive information before the opera-tion, patients whose stoma site was not marked, and patients who had experienced a complication (P <0.05). Postopera-tively, it is important to consider sociodemographic and stoma characteristics as well as preoperative variables that may influence adaptation to stoma. Additional larger, multicentered studies with extended patient follow-up are warranted.

Keywords: multicenter study, ostomy, intestinal stoma, social adjustment, stoma care

Index: Ostomy Wound Management 2015;61(10):16–29

Potential Conflicts of Interest: none disclosed

Dr. A. Karadağ is Professor, School of Nursing, Koç University, İstanbul, Turkey. Dr. Karabulut is Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Nuh Naci Yazgan University, Kayseri, Turkey. Dr. Baykara is a lecturer, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey. Dr. Harputlu is a lecturer, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, İzmir University of Economics, İzmir, Turkey. Ms. Toyluk is a Stomatherapy Unit Enterostomal Therapy Nurse, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. Ms. Ulusoy is a Stomatherapy Unit Enterostomal Therapy Nurse, Uludag University Hospital, Bursa, Turkey. Ms. S. Karadağ is a Stomatherapy Unit Enterostomal Therapy Nurse, Turkey High Specialization Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. Ms. Kahraman is a Stomatherapy Unit Enterostomal Therapy Nurse, Ege University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey. Ms. Hin is a Stomatherapy Unit Enterostomal Therapy Nurse, Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. Ms. Altinsoy is a Stomatherapy Unit Enterostomal Therapy Nurse, Istanbul University Capa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. Ms. Akil is a Stomatherapy Unit Enterostomal Therapy Nurse, Çukurova University Hospital, Adana, Turkey. Dr. Leventoğlu is an Associate Professor, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Colorectal Cancer Surgery. Please address correspon-dence to: Zehra G. Baykara, RN, PhD, Gazi Universitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Hemşirelik Bölümü, Emniyet Mah, Muammer Yaşar Bostancı Cad, No: 16, PK: 06500 Beşevler/Ankara, Turkey; email: gocmenzehra@yahoo.com.

Do Not

Duplic

ate

OCTOBER 2015 OSTOMY WOUND MANAGEMENT® 17www.o-wm.com

ASSESSING SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT IN OSTOMATES

Stomas are commonly created in the treatment of dis-eases of the gastrointestinal and urinary systems.1,2 Even

though the creation of a stoma is considered a relatively sim-ple surgical procedure, having an ostomy can adversely affect the lives of patients with a stoma and their relatives.

A significant majority of the 1 million new stomas created annually are due to colorectal cancer.1-3 According to the lit-erature,4 colorectal cancer is the third most common cause of death among males (10%) after lung and prostate cancer and the second among females (9.2%) after lung cancer through-out the world; the number of cases requiring the creation of a stoma exceeds tens of thousands each year. Intestinal sto-mas also are created to improve the patient’s condition and quality of life in the treatment of various diseases other than cancer, such as acute diverticulitis, rectal trauma, and inflam-matory bowel disease.5-7

According to descriptive studies and literature reviews,8-10 patients with a stoma experience a range of physiological, psychological, and social difficulties and challenges during the postoperative period. Physiologically, patients with an in-testinal stoma encounter changes in defecation habits, lack of defecation control, involuntary gas discharge, odor, depen-dence on a pouch, complications associated with the stoma and peristomal area, changes in daily living habits, and dete-rioration in sleeping habits or the sleeping process.

Descriptive and prospective studies and literature re-views11-15 addressing quality of life, image, sexuality, and liv-ing with stoma in patients with a permanent or temporary ostomy have shown the change in physical appearance and problems encountered may cause patients to experience psy-chological problems such as anxiety, depression, loneliness, thoughts of suicide, and deterioration in body image and self-respect. According to a descriptive, prospective study by Silva et al16 among 25 patients (18 ileostomy, 7 colos-tomy; median of 8 weeks since surgery, range 6–16 weeks), stoma care self-efficacy, stoma acceptance, interpersonal re-lationships, and location of the stoma were strongly associ-ated with adjustment. In Simmons et al’s1 prospective study among 51 patients who had a stoma for at least 6 months, patients perceived themselves to be socially different from others and were embarrassed by their condition; they de-liberately avoided and feared social relations. These studies that investigated problems of stoma patients in the postop-erative period also reported patients experienced a deterio-ration in their relationships due to the change in their body image and the new lifestyle limitations associated with their stoma11,12,14,18-21; these studies also have shown behaviors such as getting together with family and friends less frequently, quitting or changing their jobs, decreasing work hours, and limiting social activities, including traveling and entertain-ing, can be observed postoperatively in patients with a stoma.

In a descriptive, prospective study conducted by Mahjoubi et al22 among 155 Iranian patients with a stoma and in a qualitative study performed by Karabulut et al23 investigating the effects of

planned group interactions on social adaptation in 50 patients with stoma, it was determined that in order to cope with their problems, patients with a stoma needed to adjust physiological-ly, psychologically, and socially to their condition, to stoma care, and to a life with a stoma before and after surgery. A descriptive, prospective study by Karadağ et al19 evaluated the quality of life of 43 patients with a permanent colostomy, and it was deter-mined the physiological problems experienced by patients with a stoma can be reduced substantially through appropriate care, training, and counseling provided in a hospital setting by stoma and wound care nurses. However, these studies also noted that psychological, social, and sexual problems can continue to per-sist in certain stoma patients. Understanding and assessing the psychosocial issues or problems ostomates face is important for the provision of appropriate interventions to decrease difficul-ties adjusting to the stoma.

Stoma and wound care nurses play an important role in assessing and facilitating the adjustment process of patients with a stoma.20,23 Assessing the individual’s adaption to living with a stoma and specific factors influencing adjustment is crucial to nurses fulfilling these responsibilities comprehen-sively and accurately. Even though many studies on identify-ing problems experienced by stoma patients have been pub-lished,9,10,12,13,21 research into what determines a patient’s level of adjustment to the stoma and ways to enhance adjustment remain limited.17,23,24

In Turkey, few studies have been conducted thus far assess-ing patients’ adjustment to their stomas. Karabulut et al’s23

quasi-experimental investigation found 6-week, planned group interactions (ie, interactions conducted among several individuals with a stoma focusing on adjustment to and liv-ing with stoma) effectively enhanced the social adjustment of patients with a stoma.

Key Points• The authors of this study prospectively assessed the

social adjustment of 135 stoma patients using the Os-tomy Assessment Inventory (OAI-23) at 1 month and ~6 months postoperatively.

• Although average total OAI-23 scores did not increase significantly between these 2 time periods, statisti-cally significant score increases were observed among patients 50–69 years old, women, married persons, unemployed persons, people with a permanent stoma, persons who had emergency surgery and/or did not have a preoperative stoma site marked, and patients who experienced complications (P <0.05).

• Confirming results of other studies, persons who were able to care for the stoma themselves had the highest OAI scores.

Ostomy Wound Management 2015;61(10):16–29

Do Not

Duplic

ate

18 OSTOMY WOUND MANAGEMENT® OCTOBER 2015 www.o-wm.com

FEATURE

Figure 1. Ostomy Adjustment Inventory-23 (OAI-23).

Do Not

Duplic

ate

Do Not

Duplic

ate

20 OSTOMY WOUND MANAGEMENT® OCTOBER 2015 www.o-wm.com

FEATURE

The purpose of this descriptive, prospective study was to as-sess variables that may affect adaptation of patients living with a colostomy or ileostomy within the first 6 months follow-ing surgery. In this study, the participants’ sociodemographic properties and stoma-related attributes were investigated.

Methods and ProceduresStudy sample and design. The study sample included pa-

tients with a stoma that accepted an invitation to participate

in the research and who were monitored in the stomatherapy units of 7 hospitals in Turkey that 1) maintained the nec-essary patient records and 2) employed stoma and wound care nurses. Meetings were conducted with the stomatherapy units to introduce the study, and the study procedures were reiterated at the units that agreed to participate. Inclusion criteria stipulated participants: 1) had a colostomy or ileos-tomy created between September 1, 2011 and September 1, 2012; 2) were at least 18 years of age; and 3) had voluntarily agreed to participate in the study.

Study instruments.Identification Form for Patients with a Stoma. Investigators

developed a 19-item instrument based on a review of the lit-erature.12,16,25 The form consists of 2 main sections: 10 ques-tions on sociodemographic characteristics of the patients (including age, gender, marital status, educational status, and level of income) and 9 questions on the individual’s stoma type, reason for stoma creation, length of time with the sto-ma, stoma care, and status of complication development.

Ostomy Adjustment Inventory-23 (OAI-23). This self-eval-uation scale, composed of 23 items across 4 subfactors, was developed by Simmons et al26 to determine levels of adap-tion among patients with stomas. Each item is evaluated on a Likert-type scale with a score range of 0–4, with a higher score indicating better adaptation. Total adjustment scores range from 10 to 92. Twelve (12) items on the scale (items 2, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, and 21) present respondents with negative sentences and are reverse scored (see Figure 1). In a study of the scale’s validity and reliability with 570 stoma patients, the OAI-23’s Cronbach’s α was found to be 0.93 and its test-retest correlation coefficient (r) was 0.83.26

This scale was translated to Turkish by Karadag et al.27 The validity and reliability of the scale were measured in a Turk-ish sample of stoma patients,27 and the test-retest correlation coefficient (r) was 0.76.

Study procedure. All units were under the leadership of Turkish Association of Wound Ostomy Incontinence Nurs-es; each unit is owned by a different hospital in Turkey. The Association provided written permission to conduct the re-search, and patients provided verbal consent to participate. During hospitalization and following discharge, patients with a stoma were provided training and counseling accord-ing to their individual characteristics and their physiologi-cal, psychological, and social needs by stoma and wound care nurses. Each participant was evaluated once with the Iden-tification Form for Patients with a Stoma at the beginning of the study. The OAI-23 was administered twice to assess adjustment in participants: the first time within 1 month of the stoma operation and the second time within 6 months of stoma creation or immediately before the stoma was closed in persons with a temporary stoma. Study data were collected through face-to-face interviews with patients by stoma and wound care nurses working in participating hospitals; these patients had received periodic training, care, and consultancy

Table 1. Sociodemographic attributes of participants (N=135)

Sociodemographic attributes Number %

Mean age: X: 51.56 ± 15.49

≤29 12 8.9

30–49 45 33.3

50–69 62 45.9

≥70 16 11.9

Gender

Female 58 43.0

Male 77 57.0

Marital status

Married 106 78.5

Single 29 21.5

Educational background

Literate 20 14.8

Primary school 49 36.3

Secondary school 45 33.3

University 21 15.6

Working status

Working 57 42.2

Not working 78 57.8

Income level as perceived by participant

Low income 48 35.6

Middle range incomes 74 54.8

Upper range incomes 13 9.6

Parental/living status

Nonparent 11 8.1

Parent (live with family) 124 91.9

Concomittant disease

Yes 41 30.4

No 94 69.6

Receiving chemotherapy/radiotherapy

Yes 24 17.8

No 111 82.2

Do Not

Duplic

ate

Do Not

Duplic

ate

22 OSTOMY WOUND MANAGEMENT® OCTOBER 2015 www.o-wm.com

FEATURE

services from these nurses at the hospitals where they were monitored. Stoma and wound care nurses read the questions on the data collection forms; patient answers were recorded in the forms and all data forms were mailed to the principle researcher for statistical analysis.

Data analysis. The data obtained in the study were ana-lyzed using SPSS for Windows, Version 20.0 (SPSS Inc, Chi-cago, IL, USA). Number and percentile calculations and Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and Wilcoxon tests were performed. The Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney

U-test were used to compare the differences between the pa-tients’ mean adjustment scores according to their sociode-mographic characteristics and the characteristics of their sto-ma during the time of the first and second assessments. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the differences between the patients’ mean adjustment scores according to their so-ciodemographic characteristics and the characteristics of their stoma at the 2 different assessment times.

ResultsOne hundred, thirty-five (135) patients (mean age 51.56

± 15.49 years, 77 [57.0%] male) agreed to participate. One hundred, six (106, 78.5%) were married, 49 (36.3%) were primary school graduates, 45 (33.3%) were secondary school graduates, 21 (15.6%) were university graduates; and 78 (57.8%) were not working. More than half (74, 54.8%) per-ceived they were in the middle income range, and the major-ity (124, 91.9%) lived with their families (see Table 1).

Eighty-nine (89, 65.9%) had a stoma created due to can-cer. The majority of stomas created were colostomies (73, 54.1%). One hundred, six patients (106, 78.5%) had a tem-porary stoma. Stomas were created in a planned (nonemer-gent) manner for 104 patients (77%), 123 (91.1%) received information from a stoma and wound care nurse or surgeon before stoma surgery, and 86 (63.7%) had their stoma site marked by a stoma and wound care nurse. A little more than half (68, 50.4%) of study participants did not care for their stoma by themselves. The majority (115, 85.2%) did not ex-perience stomal or peristomal complications (see Table 2).

The average OAI-23 scores were 48.63 ± 13.75 for the first round and 50.59 ± 13.89 for the second assessment. Although the mean scores of patients increased, the difference in scores was not statistically significant (P >0.05) (see Table 3).

When mean scores on the inventory were examined in re-lation to the participants’ sociodemographic characteristics, the average scores of patients in the 50–69 age group, women, those who were married, and those who were unemployed were found to increase significantly over time (P <0.05).

No statistically significant differences were observed in the adjustment inventory scores of the patients according to their education level, income level, and the persons they lived with (P >0.05) (see Table 4).

The OAI-23 scores of patients with planned stoma op-erations increased from 48.12 ± 13.43 to 50.73 ± 13.96 and with permanent stomas from 49.10 ± 15.48 to 56.04 ± 10.54 (P <0.05). After the second OAI-23 administration, the mean scores of patients with a permanent stoma (56.04 ± 10.54) were significantly higher than those of patients with a tempo-rary stoma (49.38 ± 14.29) (P <0.05; see Table 4). The aver-age scores of patients who did and did not receive information before stoma surgery increased from 48.99 ± 14.09 to 50.58 ± 14.42 and from 45.30 ± 9.69 to 50.66 ± 7.95, respectively; how-ever, only the increases among persons who did not receive information before the operation were significant. Likewise,

Table 2. Stoma-related attributes (n=135)

Stoma-related attributes Number %

Reason for stoma creation

Cancer 89 65.9

Ulcerative colitis 15 11.1

Crohn’s disease 14 10.4

Injury 7 5.2

Other 10 7.4

Stoma type

Colostomy 73 54.1

Ileostomy 62 45.9

Stoma nature

Temporary 106 78.5

Permanent 29 21.5

Stoma type and duration

Permanent colostomy 28 20.7

Temporary colostomy 45 33.4

Permanent ileostomy 1 0.7

Temporary ileostomy 61 45.2

Type of operation

Emergency 31 23.0

Planned 104 77.0

Informed about construction of stoma

İnformed 123 91.1

Not informed 12 8.9

Preoperative stoma site marking

Marked 86 63.7

Unmarked 49 36.3

Stoma care provided

Self 26 19.3

Someone else 68 50.4

Self with assistance 41 30.4

Status of developing stomal/parastomal complications

Developed 20 14.8

Undeveloped 115 85.2Do N

ot Dup

licate

www.o-wm.com

ASSESSING SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT IN OSTOMATES

only OAI-23 mean scores in patients whose stoma site was not marked in-creased significantly over time (from 47.10 ± 12.28 to 52.93 ± 16.65; P <0.05) (see Table 4).

At the first questionnaire administration, the scores of patients who expe-rienced stomal or peristomal complications were lower than patients who had not experienced complications; however, increases in adjustment scores in the second evaluation were more pronounced for patients who had experienced a complication (P <0.05) (see Table 4).

DiscussionMean scores of participants on the OAI-23. In this study that aimed to

assess the social adjustment of 135 patients with a stoma, the mean scores for the OAI-23 and its subdimensions demonstrated only limited change over the short study period. This finding is consistent with that of several studies as-sessing adjustment in stoma patients. In Cheng et al’s28 interventional study in which 92 colostomy patients were provided an Expert Patient Program (EPP) for 3 weeks, the mean adjustment inventory score increased from 47.59 be-fore program participation to 53.37 after completing the program. The EPP included knowledge, stoma care self-efficacy, self-management, and psycho-social adjustment in patients who had a permanent colostomy. In a qualitative study performed in patients with stoma (N = 50) by Karabulut et al,23 the mean OAI-23 of patients in the study group was lower before planned group interactions for 6 weeks of sessions designed to enhance the adjustment to and living with a stoma in ostomy patients (53.04) and gradually increased follow-ing group meetings (70.91); however, no significant changes were noted in the scores of persons in the control group, whose averages were 51.07 and 53.07 at first and second evaluation, respectively.

Several previous investigations have reported high adjustment scores among patients with a stoma. Simmons et al26 randomly selected 570 persons with a colostomy, ileostomy, or urostomy with complete records from 3 na-tional databases and found their mean adjustment score was 63.81. In a de-scriptive, experimental study by Martin,29 the adjustment scores of 20 patients (12 experimental group, 8 control group) with recent stomas in the sixth and eighth postoperative weeks were 82.42 in the experimental group and 78.58 in the control group. In their review article on ostomies in cancer patients, Hurny and Holland30 observed stomas led to anxiety and made it more difficult for patients to adapt to their new lives, thus extending their adjustment process and period. Adjusting to an ostomy is affective (ie, requires changes in the individual’s interest, attitude and emotions toward living with stoma); a slow, gradual progression over time is expected. Moreover, many factors influence adjustment to a stoma. Within this context, the adjustment of patients with a stoma can be expected to vary according to these different variables.

Table 3. Distribution of Ostomy Adjustment Inventory and Subscales averages of patients with intestinal stoma

Subscales First measurement

X ± SD

Second measurement

X ± SD

Statistical analysis

P

Acceptance 25.30 ± 6.03 26.03 ± 6.51 0.143

Anxious preoccupation 9.31 ± 3.90 9.70 ± 3.87 0.386

Social engagement 6.68 ± 3.70 7.21 ± 3.91 0.256

Anger 7.34 ± 3.79 7.64 ± 3.72 0.643

Total 48.63 ± 13.75 50.59 ± 13.89 0.169

Do Not

Duplic

ate

24 OSTOMY WOUND MANAGEMENT® OCTOBER 2015 www.o-wm.com

FEATURE

Table 4. Distribution of Ostomy Adjustment Inventory average scores of patients by sociodemographic and stoma attributes

Sociodemographic and stoma attributes

First measurement

X ± SD

Second measurement

X ± SD

Differences between groups by measurement times

Pb

Age

≤29 52.41±12.97 45.66±10.49 0.374

30-49 48.68±14.60 51.50±16.47 0.167

50-69 48.80±14.42 52.90±13.12 0.042

≥70 45.00±8.27 44.00±7.49 0.582

Pa 0.519 0.055

Gender

Female 49.96±14,13 49.26±14.37 0.916

Male 46.87±13.13 52.24±13.21 0.002

Pa 0.269 0.119

Marital status

Married 47.87±13.22 50.89±14.16 0.014

Single 51.41±15.44 49.65±13.18 0.559

Pa 0.214 0.334

Educational background

Literate 43.35±11.74 47.26±10.48 0.313

Primary school 49.14±15.57 51.75±13.42 0.322

Secondary school 50.37±13.39 51.20±14,91 0.397

Higher education 48.76±11.10 50.00±16,17 0.305

Pa 0.389 0.783

Working status

Working 52.94±14.05 51.88±15.22 0.966

Not working 45.48±12.71 49.62±12.82 0.011

Pa 0.003 0.552

Income level perception

Low income 48.47±13.38 50.59±12.53 0.357

Middle range incomes 48.85±13.50 50.21±14.34 0.225

Upper range incomes 48.00±17.31 52.66±17.01 0.168

Pa 0.901 0.879

Parental/living status

Nonparent 43.72±17.93 49.00±11.13 0.332

Parent 49.07±13.32 50.73±14.15 0.100

Pa 0.095 0.624

Receiving chemotherapy/radiotherapy

Received 50.29±14.46 49.36±11.82 0.758

Not received 48.27±13.63 50.82±14.28 0.030

Pa 0.647

0.535

Stoma type

Colostomy 48.53±13.90 50.44±12.26 0.355

Ileostomy 48.75±13.67 50.75±15.58 0.091

Pa 0.805 0.289 Continued on next page

Do Not

Duplic

ate

ASSESSING SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT IN OSTOMATES

Table 4. Distribution of Ostomy Adjustment Inventory average scores of patients by sociodemographic and stoma attributes

Sociodemographic and stoma attributes

First measurement

X ± SD

Second measurement

X ± SD

Differences between groups by measurement times

Pb

Type of operation

Emergency 50.35±14.86 50.14±13.90 0.929

Planned 48.12±13.43 50.73±13.96 0.043

Pa 0.410 0.885

Preoperative information about stoma construction

İnformed 48.99±14.09 50.58±14.42 0.140

Not informed 45.30±9.69 50.66±7.95 0.036

Pa 0.576 0.781

Preoperative stoma site marking

Marked 49.51±14.51 49.25±11.95 0.900

Unmarked 47.10±12.28 52.93±16.65 0.004

Pa 0,657 0.113

Stoma nature

Temporary 48.50±13.31 49.38±14.29 0.160

Permanent 49.10±15.48 56.04±10.54 0.181

Pa 0.874 0.009

Stoma care performed by

Self 52.73±14.16 54.65±15.95 0.308

Someone else 45.52±13.10 48.72±12.32 0.077

Self with assistance 51.19±13.64 51.16±14.76 0.752

Pa 0.027 0.296

Stomal / peristomal problem status

Yes 45.95±13.26 57.45±13.42 0.002

None 49.10±13.83 49.23±13.64 0.588

Pa 0.404 0.015Pa Difference among patients’ average scores by sociodemographic and stoma attributes by first and second measurement time Pb Difference among patients’ average scores by sociodemographic and stoma attributes by measurement times

continued

Do Not

Duplic

ate

26 OSTOMY WOUND MANAGEMENT® OCTOBER 2015 www.o-wm.com

FEATURE

Participants’ sociodemographic attributes.Age. Sociodemographic variables such as age, gender, edu-

cation, and occupation have been found to influence adjust-ment to a stoma.12,31 The current study demonstrated the mean adjustment scores of patients 29 years old or younger decreased over time, while scores of patients in the 30–69 age group increased. In a cross-sectional study by Piwonka and Merino31 that studied the influence of age on social ad-justment among 60 patients with a stoma, the most salient factors affecting adjustment to a stoma in patients under 62 years were the amount of time since the operation, body im-age, social support, and a low number of postoperative com-plications. The most relevant factors for patients 62 years of age and older were being able to take care of the stoma and body image. Many external factors are thought to influence adjustment in young and middle-aged patients, but as pa-tients get older, external factors influencing adjustment have been known to decrease, with only the status of the disease and being able to assume care remaining important.23

Gender. In this study, the adjustment scores in the first OAI-23 assessment were lower in women than men; howev-er, in the second assessment, the men’s scores remained un-changed, while women’s gradually increased and the differ-ence between adjustment scores was statistically significant (P = 0.002). In a descriptive study by Karadağ and Baykara32 on 126 patients with a stoma, 35.7% of women and 58.4% of men reported the stoma made them dependent or semi-dependent (P <0.05) on others. Thus, the findings regarding the faster rate of adjustment to the stoma in women, relative to men, were expected.

Education and income status. Although mean scores in-creased over time depending on patient level of education and income and living status (ie, alone or with parents), the differences were not statistically significant (P >0.05) (see Table 4). When these factors were examined in relation to patient characteristics associated with the stoma, adjust-ment scores did not appear to change according to stoma type, although they increased over time, if not significantly (P >0.05) (see Table 4).

Working status. In the current study, the initial OAI-23 scores of unemployed patients were significantly lower than those of employed patients. These scores increased signifi-cantly in subsequent evaluation of adjustment (P <0.05). From these results, the authors inferred unemployed patients may have a tendency to constantly focus on their ostomy and hence may require a longer period to effectively adjust to their stoma

Marital status. Current results indicated significant im-provements in adjustment among married patients over time. Support from one’s partner has been identified as be-ing a contributing factor to adjustment.24 Social support pro-vided by an individual’s family, children, or friends also had a positive influence on adjustment.31 In a descriptive study (N = 30), Altschuler et al33 found performing care together with

one’s partner has a positive impact on psychosocial adjust-ment. Having a stoma presents a social issue that influences not only patients with the stoma, but also their partners, families, and close circles. Support from a partner is highly important to an individual’s adjustment to a stoma.

Stoma-related attributes. Preoperative preparation. The study found the initial mean

adjustment scores of patients who were informed of the sto-ma operation and whose stoma site was marked were higher than those of patients who were not informed of the surgery and whose stoma site was not marked before surgery. Addi-tionally, the current study reported adjustment in patients who underwent a planned operation and in persons who were not informed of the operation increased significantly with time (P <0.05). In a clinical study conducted by Person et al34 on 105 patients with a stoma (60 men, 45 women), quality of life and independence increased over time among patients whose stoma site was marked and their complica-tions decreased significantly over time. Educating patients during the preoperative and postoperative stages of life about the stoma and its care and marking the site before surgery ap-pears to facilitate acceptance of the stoma and adjustment to the postoperative process.

In a multicenter, retrospective, descriptive study (N = 748) conducted by Baykara et al35 involving individuals who underwent stoma site marking, the rates of peristomal com-plications were found to be significantly lower compared to individuals with no preoperative stoma site marking. The current authors believe stoma site marking will directly and indirectly increase adaptation. Thus, the low OAI-23 scores of patients whose stoma site was not marked before the op-eration was an expected finding.

Stoma type. The mean inventory scores of patients with a permanent stoma in the first and second evaluations were higher than those of patients with a temporary stoma (P <0.05). According to Karabulut et al,23 patients with a per-manent stoma may make an effort to adjust more quickly because they know they will be experiencing this condition for the rest of their lives, whereas patients with a temporary stoma — aware the condition is temporary and the stoma will be closed — may not feel the need to adjust as urgently. As such, decreases in the OAI-23 scores from first to second measurement were anticipated. The literature26,31 notes char-acteristics of the stoma such as stoma duration, stoma type, and nature (ie, temporary or permanent) are among the vari-ables most likely to affect adjustment. In Wade’s24 study on patients with colostomies, the incidence of depression was higher in patients with a temporary stoma (13%) compared to patients with a permanent stoma (6%). The authors be-lieve the large majority (78.5%) of individuals with a tem-porary stoma in the current study might have negatively af-fected the mean OAI-23 score.

Stomal problems. Approximately 14.8% of the stoma patients in the study experienced stomal/peristomal complications (see

Do Not

Duplic

ate

Do Not

Duplic

ate

28 OSTOMY WOUND MANAGEMENT® OCTOBER 2015 www.o-wm.com

FEATURE

Table 2). The rate of stomal/peristomal complications was measured at 32.8%, 35%, 24.1%, and 48%, respectively, in a retrospective descriptive study by Karadağ36 (N =128), a pro-spective, descriptive study by Ratliff et al37 (N = 220), a retro-spective, descriptive study by Akçam et al38 (N = 120), and a retrospective study by Özaydın et al39 (N = 96). Stoma com-plications have been known to vary between 10% and 70%.3 In the current short-term study, although patients who ex-perienced stomal and peristomal complications scored com-paratively low on the OAI-23 first measurement, they showed marked improvements in adjustment when assessed at a sub-sequent point in time (second measurement). Descriptive, prospective studies6,40 in the literature demonstrated stomal and peristomal complications adversely impact adjustment to and living with the stoma.

Among patients experiencing stomal/peristomal compli-cations in the current study, persons whose stoma care was performed by someone else scored the lowest on the OAI-23 initially (43.31). However, their scores increased significantly by the final assessment (55.68; P <0.05). Previous research26,31 shows many factors (such as status of performing stoma care, body image perception, amount of social support, the period following the surgery) influence the extent to which patients are able to adapt to the stoma. In their 4-year longitudinal study of 59 stoma patients and 64 bowel-resected nonstoma patients, Bekkers et al41 observed adjustment scores and the provision of stoma care were significantly affected by the occurrence of stoma-related complications within the 4 months following the creation of the stoma. In cases where no complications were observed, adjustment to the stoma was reported to take 2 years or longer, which could be ex-tended by complications.

As these results and the literature demonstrate, many fac-tors potentially enhance or inhibit adjustment among patients with a stoma. Furthermore, the relationships among these various factors significantly influence adjustment to the stoma. At times, many different factors can simultaneously influence a contributing factor. Given this information, an individual’s adjustment to the stoma may be influenced by the sum of his or her experiences rather than a single determinant.

Limitations The main limitations of the present study were its relative-

ly small sample size and short monitoring period of adjust-ment (6 months) — the authors were not able to observe the long-term adjustment of patients with a stoma. Therefore, the generalizability of the results obtained may be limited.

ConclusionThe results of this study suggest patients start adjusting

to living with an intestinal stoma after surgery. Many factors, such as preoperative information, the ability to perform care, and countermeasures against stomal and peristomal compli-cations, influence adjustment.

It is also essential for training and supportive services to be individually tailored to patients according to their char-acteristics and physiological, psychological, and social needs. Stoma care nurses should be alert to risk factors for less-than-optimal adjustment. For example, in this study, it was determined that factors such as age, gender, marital status, working status, chemotherapy/radiotherapy applications, planned/emergent operation, being informed before the op-eration, stoma site marking, complications, stoma care, and temporary/permanent stoma had a statistically significant effect on the OAI-23 score. It also was determined that the educational status and income level did not have an effect on the OAI-23 score.

Multicentered studies with larger populations should be conducted. Ostomy patients should be monitored in the postoperative 6 months, 1 year, and for longer periods to as-sess social adjustment. n

References1. Harris RP, Daly KJ, Jones LS, Kiff ES. Stoma formation for functional bow-

el disease. Colorect Dis. 2004;6(4):280–284.2. Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, Heanue M, Colombet M, Boyle P. Estimates

of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(3):581–592.

3. Robertson I, Leung E, Hughes D, et al. Prospective analysis of stoma-related complications. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7(3):279–285.

4. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC GLOBOCAN) (2012). Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide. Avail-able at: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx. Accessed March, 19, 2014.

5. Krouse R, Grant M, Ferrell B, Dean G, Nelson R, Chu D. Quality of life outcomes in 599 cancer and non-cancer patients with colostomies. J Surg Res. 2007;138(1):79–87.

6. Karadağ A. Stomaterapy and stoma care nursing. In: Baykan A, Zorluoğlu A, Geçim E, Terzi C. Colon and Rectal Cancers, 1st ed. İstanbul, Turkey: Seçil Ofset Matbaacılık ve Ambalaj Sanayi Ltd. Şti;2010:693–712.

7. Dabirian A, Yaghmaei F, Rassouli M, Tafreshi MZ. Quality of life in ostomy patients: a qualitative study. J Patient Prefer and Adherence. 2011;5:1-5. Doi: 10.2147/PPA.S14508.

8. Nugent KP, Daniels P, Stewart B, Patankar R, Johnson CD. Quality of life in stoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42(12):1569–1574.

9. Black PK. Psychological, sexual and cultural issues for patients with a stoma. Br J Nurs. 2004;13(12):692–697.

10. Burch J. Psychological problems and stomas: a rough guide for commu-nity nurses. Br J Community Nurs. 2005;10(5):224–227.

11. Sprunk E, Alteneder RR. The impact of an ostomy on sexuality. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2000;4(2):85–88.

12. Brown H, Randle J. Living with a stoma: a review of the literature. J Clin Nurs. 2005;14(1):74–81.

13. Kılıç E, Taycan O, Belli AK, Özmen M. Kalıcı ostomi ameliyatının beden algısı, benlik saygısı, eş uyumu ve cinsel işlevler üzerine etkisi. Türk Psiki-yatri Dergisi. 2007;18(4):302–310.

14. Yaşan A, Ünal S, Gedik E, Girgin S. Kalıcı ve geçici ostomi yapılmış kişilerde yaşam kalitesinde değişim, depresyon ve anksiyete. Anatolian J Psychiatry. 2008;9(3):162–168.

15. Sharpe L, Patel D, Clarke S. The relationship between body image distur-bance and distress in colorectal cancer patients with and without stomas. J Psychosom Res. 2011;70(5):395–402.

16. Silva MA, Ratnayake G, Deen KI. Quality of life of stoma patients: tempo-rary ileostomy versus colostomy. World J Surg. 2003;27(4):421–424.

17. Simmons KL, Smith JA, Bobb KA, Liles LL. Adjustment to colostomy: sto-ma acceptance, stoma care self-efficacy and interpersonal relationships. J Advanced Nurs. 2007;60(6):627–635.

18. Persson E, Hellström AL. Experiences of Swedish men and women 6 to 12 weeks after ostomy surgery. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2002;29(2):103–108.

19. Karadağ A, Menteş BB, Üner A. İmpact of stomatherapy on quality of life in patients with permanent colostomies or ileostomies. İnt J Colorectal Dis. 2003;18(3):234–238.

20. Ayaz S. Stomalı Bireylerde Hemşirenin Rolü. Türkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci.

Do Not

Duplic

ate

OCTOBER 2015 OSTOMY WOUND MANAGEMENT® 29www.o-wm.com

ASSESSING SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT IN OSTOMATES

2007;27(1):86–90.21. Sun V, Grant M, McMullen CK, et al. Surviving colorectal cancer: long-term,

persistent ostomy-specific concerns and adaptations. J Wound Ostomy Con-tinence Nurs. 2013;40(1):61–72.

22. Mahjoubi B, Mohammadsadeghi H, Mohammadipour M, Mirzaei R, Moini R. Evaluation of psychiatric illness in Iranian stoma patients. J Psychosom Res. 2009;66(3):249–253.

23. Karabulut H, Dinç L, Karadağ A. Effects of planned group interactions on the social adaptation of patients with an intestinal stoma: a quantitative study. J Clinical Nurs. 2014;23(19-20):2800–2813.

24. Wade B. Colostomy patients: psychological adjustment at 10 weeks and 1 year after surgery in districts which employed stoma care nurses and districts which did not. J Advanced Nurs. 1990;15(11):1297–1304.

25. Baykara Z, Leventoğlu S, Menteş B. Stoması kapatılan bireylerin ilk

bağırsak boşaltımına ilişkin duygu ve düşünceleri bir pilot çalışma. Kolon Rektum Hastalıkları Dergisi. 2007;7(2):76–81.

26. Simmons KL, Smith JA, Maekawa A. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Ostomy Adjustment Inventory-23. J Wound Ostomy Con-tinence Nurs. 2009;36(1):69–76.

27. Karadağ A, Baykara ZG, Korkut H, Çelik B. Adaptation of the ostomy adjustment inventory into Turkish Language. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi. 2011;27(4):206–211.

28. Cheng F, Xu Q, Dai XD, Yang LL. Evaluation of the expert patient pro-gram in a Chinese population with permanent colostomy. Cancer Nurs. 2012;35(1):E27–E33.

29. Martin KK. Enterostomal therapy nursing interventions and social adjus-ment of patients following ostomi surgery. A Thesis Degree of Master. Texas Woman’s University, College Of Nursing, Denton, TX;1994.

30. Hurny C, Holland J. Psychosocial sequelae of ostomies in cancer patients. CA: Cancer J Clin. 1985;35(3):170–183.

31. Piwonka MA, Merino JM. A multidimentional modeling of predictors influ-

encing the adjustment to a colostomy. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 1999;26(6):298–305.

32. Karadağ A, Baykara ZG. The state of exercising autonomy by patients with stomas. Türkiye Klinikleri Tıp Etiği-Hukuku-Tarihi Dergisi. 2012;20(1):16–23.

33. Altschuler A, Ramirez M, Grant M, et al. The influence of husbands’ or male partners’ support on women’s psychosocial adjustment to having an ostomy resulting from colorectal cancer. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009;36(3):299–305.

34. Person B, Ifargan R, Lachter J, Duek S, Kluger Y, Assalia A. The impact of preoperative stoma site marking on the incidence of complications, quality of life, and patient’s independence. Dis Colon Rectum, 2012;55(7):783–787.

35. Baykara GZ, Guler DS, Karadağ A, et al. A multicenter, retrospective study to evaluate the effect of preoperative stoma site marking on stomal and peristomal complications. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2014;60(4):16–26.

36. Karadağ A. Frequency of stomal complications. World Council of Enteros-tomal Therapists J. 2004;24(1-4):41–43.

37. Ratliff CR, Scarano KA, Donovan AM, Colwell JC. Descriptive study of peris-tomal complications. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2005;32(1):33–37.

38. Akçam AT, Alabaz Ö, Parsak CK, Sakman G, Erkoçak EU. Complications of stoma. Ostomi Dergisi. 2005;1(January-April):79.

39. Özaydın İ, Taşkın AK, İskender A. Stoma ile ilgili komplikasyonların retros-pektif analizi. J Clin Experimental Investig. 2013;4(1):63–66.

40. Wound Ostomy Continence Nurses Society Committee Members, Ameri-can Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Committee Members. ASCRS and WOCN joint position statement on the value of preoperative stoma marking for patients undergoing fecal ostomy surgery. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nursing. 2007;34(6):627–628.

41. Bekkers MJ, Van Dulmen AM, Van den Borne HW, Van Berge Hene-gouwen GP. Survival and psychosocial adjustment to stoma surgery and nonstoma bowel resection: a 4-year follow-up. J Psychosom Res. 1997;42(3):235–244.

Ostomy Wound Management sadly acknowledges the passing of Editorial Board member Steven I. Re-ger, PhD, CP. Dr. Reger was an alumnus and former Associate Professor at the University of Virginia. A biomedical engineer and prosthetist by training, he was the Emeritus Director for Rehabilitation Tech-nology in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine at The Cleveland Clinic and a founding member of National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Dr. Reger was well-known nationally and internationally for his academic excellence and research in rehabilitation engineering and wound care. He was awarded numerous patents and research grants and authored more than 200 scientific publications. Dr. Reger also provided clinical services to patients with various mobility issues for more than 30 years.

A long-time member of the OWM Editorial Board, his manuscript reviews always were detailed and insightful and reflected his intimate understanding of the mechanics of pressure ulcers. He was also a delightful dance partner at SAWC parties — always the rare combination of professional and fun. We are grateful for his many contributions to our Board and to the wound care arena.

Obituary

Do Not

Duplic

ate

View publication statsView publication stats