activity planning: improving the process to align with accreditation criteria (brillinger)

41
Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria Beth Brillinger, CCMEP Director of Accreditation March 20, 2014

Upload: d-warnick-consulting

Post on 20-Jan-2015

474 views

Category:

Education


3 download

DESCRIPTION

CMEpalooza

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria

Beth Brillinger, CCMEP Director of Accreditation March 20, 2014

Page 2: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

Beth Brillinger, CCMEP l  An ACCME accredited provider's perspective l  Director of Accreditation at CME Outfitters l  18 years in CME l  Academic perspective

–  Abington Memorial Hospital –  Jefferson Medical College

l  Medical Education Companies (All ACCME Accredited) –  Vox Medica (ICHE) –  The FCG Institute for Medical Education –  DIME

l  CME Outfitters, LLC achieved AwC for last two cycles l  Multiple joint sponsor activities

Page 3: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

Excellent Resources l ACCME Examples of Compliance and

Noncompliance l Accreditation Requirements and

Descriptions of the ACCME – Updated 2/25/14 with new Simplification

l ACCME.org – search box upper right

Page 4: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

CME Planning Document Process l Addresses Criteria 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 17, 18,

and 19 l Use the planning doc to

– Document a systematic planning process for each of your CME activities

– document compliance with criteria during survey

Page 5: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

Criterion 2 l The provider incorporates into CME

activities the educational needs (knowledge, competence, or performance) that underlie the professional practice gaps of their own learners.

l When found to be noncompliant, description states, “ACCME could not find evidence that a professional practice gap was identified.”

Page 6: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

C2: How Practice Gaps are Identified

Page 7: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

C2: How the Needs that Underlie Practice Gaps are Identified

Page 8: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

C2: Statement of Need is Developed

Page 9: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

C2: Application of Gaps to Content

Page 10: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

Knowledge, Competence, and Performance Needs/Gaps are Incorporated into the Activity with Learning Objectives

Page 11: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

Criterion 3 l The provider generates activities/

educational interventions that are designed to change competence, performance, or patient outcomes as described in its mission statement.

l  Implementing Criterion 2 – provider attempts to change a physician’s competence, performance, or patient outcomes

Page 12: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

C3 (and C2): Planners Indicate What Changes the Content is Anticipating

Page 13: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

Criterion 5 l The provider chooses educational formats

for activities/interventions that are appropriate for the setting, objectives, and desired results of the activity.

l Why was a format (didactic, interactive, small group) chosen?

l Will the format help to change competence, performance, and/or patient outcomes?

Page 14: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

C5

Page 15: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

Criterion 6 l The provider develops activities/

educational interventions in the context of desirable physician attributes [eg, Institute of Medicine (IOM) competencies, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Competencies].

Page 16: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

C6: (cont’d) l What are desirable physician

attributes? – Institute of Medicine (IOM) Core

Competencies – Accreditation Council for Graduate

Medical Education (AGCME) Core Competencies

Page 17: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

C6: (cont’d) l “In the context of desirable physician

attributes” – Providers must show that there is active recognition of desirable physician attributes in the planning process.

Page 18: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

C6: Physician Competencies & Attributes

Page 19: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

Criterion 17 l The provider utilizes non-education

strategies to enhance change as an adjunct to its activities/educational interventions (e.g., reminders, patient feedback).

l Specifically, my example will use the strategy “reminders as tools to enhance, or facilitate, change”

Page 20: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

C17: Non-Educational Strategies

Page 21: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

Criterion 18 l The provider identifies factors outside

the provider's control that impact on patient outcomes.

l In our document, planners identify factors outside of their control that may have an impact on patient outcomes

Page 22: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

C18: Identify Barriers

Page 23: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

C18: Identify Patient Safety Issue

Page 24: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

Criterion 19 l The provider implements educational

strategies to remove, overcome or address barriers to physician change.

Page 25: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

C19: How will barriers be addressed?

Page 26: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

C19: How will patient safety considerations be discussed?

Page 27: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

Example of What these Sections Look Like for an Activity

Page 28: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

Page 29: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

Page 30: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

Page 31: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

Page 32: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

Page 33: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

Page 34: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

Page 35: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

Page 36: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

Page 37: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

Criterion 13 l The provider identifies, plans and

implements the needed or desired changes in the overall program (eg, planners, teachers, infrastructure, methods, resources, facilities, interventions) that are required to improve on ability to meet the CME mission.

Page 38: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

C13: (cont’d) l What needs to change? The planning

process and how it is documented l You are here, if you learn anything

new, implement it, and you have changed your program with an improvement to your process

Page 39: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

C13: (cont’d) l Just by viewing this presentation –

right now! – you may have identified a practice gap and determined that you can improve your performance as a provider.

l You may decide to make a change in your overall program such as developing a new method…

Page 40: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

C13: (cont’d) l Like using a planning document to

capture several accreditation criteria planning steps

l And improving your program planning process

Page 41: Activity Planning: Improving the Process to Align with Accreditation Criteria (Brillinger)

Education with Integrity.

Beth Brillinger, CCMEP l [email protected] l 614-328-4523