advanced monolithic pixel sensors using soi technology...jima chart (rt rc-05) au thickness 1um...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Advanced monolithic pixel sensors using SOI technology
T. Miyoshi1, Y. Arai1, M. Asano2, Y. Fujita1, R. Hamasaki3, K. Hara2, S. Honda2,
Y. Ikegami1, I. Kurachi1, S. Mitsui4, R. Nishimura3, K. Tauchi1, N. Tobita2 ,
T. Tsuboyama1, M. Yamada1 and the SOIPIX collaboration1High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK)2Univ. Of Tsukuba, 3SOKENDAI, 4Kanazawa Univ.
1
FRONTIER DETECTORS FOR FRONTIER PHYSICS
13th Pisa Meeting on Advanced Detectors
24-30 May 2015
- La Biodola, Isola d'Elba (Italy)
http://rd.kek.jp/project/soi/
http://rd.kek.jp/project/soi/
-
2
Outlines
SOI monolithic pixel sensors
KEK DAQ system and performance
Current issues and solutions
Sensor performance (Integration-type pixel sensors)
Future plan and summary
FPIXb
MX1711
(FY13-2)
MX1655
(FY13-1)
INTPIX7
(18 mm x 18 mm)
30
mm
24mm
6mm
SPRiT
(SOI Portable
Radiation imaging Terminal)
-
•No mechanical bump bonding. Fabricated with semiconductor process only
• Fully depleted (thick & thin) sensing region
with low sense node capacitance (~10 fF@17 mm pixel) high sensor gain
・SOI-CMOS; Analog and digital circuit can be closer smaller pixel size• Wide temperature range (1-570K)
• Low single event cross section
• Technology based on industry standards; cost benefit
3
The features of SOI monolithic pixel sensor
Insulator
(SiO2)
High R Si
Low R Si
SOI Monolithic pixel sensor
Targets
High-Energy Physics
X-ray astronomy
Material science
Non-destructive inspection
Medical application
SOI=Silicon on insulator2005-
-
Process
(Lapis
Semiconductor
Co. Ltd.)
0.2mm Low-Leakage Fully-Depleted (FD) SOI CMOS
1 Poly, 5 Metal layers (MIM Capacitor and DMOS option)
Core (I/O) voltage : 1.8 (3.3) V
SOI wafer
(200 mm f
=8 inch)
Top Si : Cz, ~18 -cm, p-type, ~40 nm thick
Buried Oxide: 200 nm thick
Handle wafer thickness: 725 mm thinned up to 300 mm (Lapis)
or ~50 mm (commercial process)
Handle wafer type: NCZ, NFZ, PCZ, PFZ, double SOI
Backside
process (2011~)
Mechanical Grind Chemical Etching Back side Implant
Laser Annealing Al plating
4
Process Summary
• KEK organizes MPW runs once/twice a year
• Mask is shared to reduce cost of a design
• Including pixel detector chip and SOI-CMOS circuit chip
25mm x 30mm
-
Sensor test and DAQ system
On package< 6mm-sq
On circuit board> 6mm-sq
5
User FPGA
SiTCPFPGA
100Mbps
1Gbps
ADC(16)DAC4)
SEABAS1
SEABAS218mm
6mm
Detector board DAQ board
-
6
DAQ software & GUI
ROOT on linux
Single thread scheme (2008-)
ROOT+QT+OpenCV(+picojson)+MSVC
Multi-thread scheme (2014-)
NFZ-INTPIX4(FY2009) @ 150V
17mm pixel size x 832x512
Pixel scan time 400 ns/pixel
65Hz, compressedtrimmer
Monochromatic
X-ray 33.3 keV
-
7
INTPIX4 still images with up-to-date system
INTPIX4+SEABAS2, 4ms x 2000fr, 150V, scan time 320ns/pixel
33.3keV monochromatic X-ray KEK Photon Factory BL-14C1
4ms x 2000fr
* INTPIX4 size ~14x9mm
-
Current issues
8
SiO2
Si
1. Additional pixel process
2. Improved SOI wafer
Solutions
Charge
Collection
Depends on layout
and circuit
Affecting electric field
Total Ionization
Dose (TID) effect
Matsumura, Hideaki, et al. "Improving Charge-Collection Efficiency of SOI Pixel Sensors for X-ray Astronomy." NIM A (2015).
-
Various Implantation Options in Sensor part and Double SOI
SOI process
9
Shield the back-gate effect / optimize charge collection efficiency
Nested-well process (Increase crosstalk?)
p/n various doping density
Middle SOI:
Additional shield layer
STEM image
Top SOI: SOI-CMOS
Double SOI (DSOI)
-
Current issues and solutions
10
Buried P-Well (BPW)
another SOI layer
1. BPW process : effective to analog circuit in a pixel
2. Double SOI wafer : effective to digital circuit in a pixel
3. Additional process : improve charge collection efficiency
SiO2
Si
Compensate charge accumulation
Reduce coupling capacitance
-
1.0E-10
1.0E-09
1.0E-08
1.0E-07
1.0E-06
1.0E-05
1.0E-04
-200 -150 -100 -50 0
AB
S(V
DET
I)[A
]
VDET-VIO_BPW [V]
MX1786D-1J-DSOI INTPIX8
1.0E-12
1.0E-11
1.0E-10
1.0E-09
1.0E-08
1.0E-07
1.0E-06
1.0E-05
1.0E-04
-200 -150 -100 -50 0
I [A
]
VDET-VIO_BPW [V]
MX1655D-1J-DSOI INTPIX7 ID#24
RSTx=1.8V
1.0E-09
1.0E-08
1.0E-07
1.0E-06
1.0E-05
1.0E-04
1.0E-03
0 50 100 150 200
I[A
]
VDET-VIO_BPW [V]
MX1594-D1J-DSOI-3 INTPIXh2
11
Breakdown voltage: double SOI sensor I-V measurement
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
-10 10 30 50 70
I[A
]
Vdet-Vio_bpw[V]
double SOI INTPIX3g (T=23deg)
Double SOI 1st trial Double SOI 2nd trial
Recover breakdown voltages: Similar to the single SOI case
60V 160V
Still incomplete
Process improvement110V
Almost the same as NCZ/NFZ cases
2015(up-to-date)2014
Treatment of edge of SOI chip is incomplete.
N-type sensor
P-type sensor
P-type sensor
N-type sensor
3rd&4th5th
-
Residual of Vth shifts of various FET types(FETs grouped into 3 in VSOI2 setting)
NMOS
Thre
sho
ld v
olt
age
●VSOI2= 0V●VSOI2=-1V●VSOI2=-2V
●VSOI2=-3V●VSOI2=-4V●VSOI2=-5V
●VSOI2=-10V●VSOI2=-15V●VSOI2=-20V
●VSOI2=-25V
NMOS- - - pre-irrad
2MGy
FET threshold shifts and compensation in DSOIIV curves of an NMOS (2MGy irradiated) withChanging VDSOI2
S. Honda et al., “Total Ionization Damage Compensations in Double Silicon-on-Insulator Pixel Sensors”, PoS (TIPP2014)039. K. Hara et al., ”Initial Characteristics and Radiation Damage Compensation of Double Silicon-on-Insulator Pixel Device,”, PoS(VERTEX2014)033.
12
-
)V (Sensor Bias
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Ch
arg
e (
AD
C c
oun
t)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
preirrad
100kGy VSOI2=-10V
V_RST(preirrad)=550mV
V_RST(100kGy)=950mVINT_TIME=120ns
Response to infrared laser of 1064 nm wavelength and 10 ns pulse duration.
13
The pixel images after 100 kGy could not obtain but recovered with VSOI2=-10V.
The average ADC count as function of the square root of the bias voltage for sensor.Obtained similar linearity and sensitivity to pre-irradiation with VSOI2=-10 V .
Pre-irrad
VSOI2=0V VSOI2=-10V
S. Honda et al., TIPP12014, 2-6 June 2014, Amsterdam
PIXEL2014 presentation by M. Yamada
N-type Double SOI pixel sensor
-
14
SOI Pixel sensor with N-type, P-type (and double SOI wafers)Spatial resolution study using NFZ-FPIXb
P-type sensor study using PFZ-INTPIX7 compared with NFZ-INTPIX7
X-ray target (Cu)
500mmIC1
IC2
absorber
slit2
slit1
INTPIX7
slit1 slit2sample
NFZ-FPIXb
Front illumination
NFZ/PFZ-INTPIX7
Front illumination
FPIXb
KEK-PF monochromatic X-ray 16 keV
Pixel size 8 um x 512 x 192 pixels Pixel size 12 um x 1408 x 1408 pixels
12m
m
8mm~10Tr.
4Tr.
-
Spatial resolution
• Cu 8keV、20kV、2mA、front illumination, bias 100V
• Ratio 16μm slit、
INTPIX4(17μm):0.57、FPIXb(8μm):0.83
15
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350G
ray
scal
eNumber of pixel
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Gra
y sc
ale
Number of pixel
25μm 20μm 16μm 25μm 20μm 16μm
NFZ-INTPIX4 17um pixel NFZ-FPIXb 8um pixel
INTPIX4 FPIXb
16μm zoom-in
Vis
ible
lin
e
Dar
k lin
e
X-ray test chart + X-ray tube
-
16
Spatial resolution (2)
JIMA chart (RT RC-05)
Au thickness 1um (very thin!)
After clustering
before clustering
X-ray tube: Target Cu
NFZ-FPIXbCu 20kV 10maBackbias 100V1ms x 2000fr.
8um slit can be seen
-
Energy resolution
• X-ray spectra Am241 at room temperature
• Energy resolution (FWHM) @13.9keV
INTPIX4 CZN:1.87 keV (13.4%)、FPIXb FZN:0.80 keV (5.8%)
17
2011 JPS A. Takeda et al.
13.9keV
20.8keV
17.8keV
13.9keV
20.8keV
17.8keVCu 8.0keV
Mo 17.5keV
INTPIX4 CZN 200V back illumination FPIXb FZN 100V front illumination
Cu+Mo+Am241Am241
-
18
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
0 100 200 300 400
I[A
]
VDET-VIOBPW[V]
I[A] NCZ
I[A] NFZ
I[A] PFZ
Leakage current ofNCZ/NFZ/PFZ-INTPIX7
P-type SOI sensor: PFZ-INTPIX7 vs. NFZ-INTPIX7
PFZ SOI sensor has high leakage current and low breakdown voltage
Modification of P-type wafer fabrication process is required.
16 keV Monochromatic X-ray at KEK Photon FactoryBeam spot size 0.4 mm x 0.4 mmFront illumination, Vbb 150V
Beam spot
~34 pixels (12x34~0.4mm)
NFZ
PFZ
ADU
ADU
Preliminary
Preliminary
16keV peak
16keV peak
PFZ-500um thick
NFZ-500um thick
-
19
Summary and future plan
SOI pixel sensor development since 2005SOI pixel sensor system with Gbit Ethernet (SEABAS2) works fine
Current issues:The back-gate effect will be suppressed by BPW process or double SOIRadiation hardness can be improved with double SOI
Initial test of double SOI, N-type, P-type sensors was successfulAll wafers need to be improved, especially p-type wafer
Future plan:Crosstalk study must be done with counting-type pixel sensorsCharge collection issue must be solved using novel idea of p/n implantation
-
20
Thank you for your attention!
-
21
Supplement
-
SOI Wafer for monolithic sensor
Smart cutTM by Soitec
High Resistivity Silicon:
N-type Czochralski, NCZ, 0.7 kOhm-cm, 300 mm-thick
N-type Float Zone, NFZ, 2-7k Ohm-cm, 500 mm-thick
P-type Czochralski, PCZ, 1k Ohm-cm, 300 mm-thick
P-type Float Zone, PFZ, 2-40k Ohm-cm, 500 mm-thick
Initial silicon
Oxidation
Implantation
Splitting
High R
Low R
Cleaning and
bonding
SOI wafer
22
circuit sensor
-
Double SOI (DSOI) pixel sensor
Initial silicon
23
Middle SOI: Additional shield layer
STEM image
SOI wafer
Double SOI N-type sensor (2011-2013) MPW11(MX1501),12-1(MX1542),12-2(MX1594)
Double SOI P-type sensor (2014-) MPW13-1(MX1655), MPW13-2(MX1711),
MPW14(MX1786), MPW15-1(MX1850)
Top SOI: SOI-CMOS