agb - asymptotic giant branch wykład iv model atmosphers of agb stars ryszard szczerba centrum...
TRANSCRIPT
AGB - AGB - Asymptotic Giant BranchAsymptotic Giant Branch
wykład IVwykład IVModel atmosphers of AGB starsModel atmosphers of AGB stars
Ryszard Szczerba
Centrum Astronomiczne im. M. Kopernika, Toruń
(56) 62 19 249 ext. 27
http://www.ncac.torun.pl/~szczerba/
„„Asymptotic Giant Branch”Asymptotic Giant Branch”
Harm Habing, Hans Olofsson (Eds.)
A&A Library, 2004 Springer-Verlag
AGB Stars: the atmospheres• From microscopic properties of gas and
radiation in AGB stellar atmospheres
• To the macroscopic properties and overall structure of the atmospheres.
1. The modelling of AGB Star Atmospheres2. Dynamics - pulsations - dust formation
The modelling of AGB Stars atmospheres – Basic equations
v
vvvvvvv
gas
vvgas
SdvSJdvFc
u
ugpu
ueueut
dvFc
gpuut
u
ut
QfluxQdensityt
;)(41
)(
2
1
2
1
1)(
0)(
sinkssources)()(
00
22
0
A conservation Eq.
1.Mass:
2.Momentum: (Eq. of motion). RS= Hydr. equilibrium + rad. pressure
3.Energy: e-internal energy; work: -against pressure, -by gravity, -by rad. forces, -difference between heating and cooling
),,(),,(),,(),,(1
tnrItnrtnrtnrIstc vvvv
These 3 Eqs. of mass, momentum and energy conservation must be solved together with:
Equation of radiative transfer
The modelling of AGB Stars atmospheres – Basic equations
ijijijij
ijijijii CRPPnPnun
dt
dn
;)()(
System of rate equations
),(),(),(),(1 2
rIrrrIrr vvvv
Equation of radiative transfer (time-independent)
The modelling of AGB Stars atmospheres – approximations: static case
ijijijij
ijijij CRPPnPn
;0)(
System of rate equations (statistical equilibrium)
dvSJ
dvFc
gp
vvv
vvgas
)(0
10
0
0
2.Momentum: Hydr. equilibrium with rad. pressure
3.Energy: radiative equilibrium
The modelling of AGB Stars atmospheres – approximations: static case – further simplifications
dvSJ
JBS
vvv
vvvvv
vv
v
vv
)(0
;
0
LTE for gas: Saha equation (ion. st.) Boltzman equation (l.p.)
3.Energy: radiative equilibrium
linesvcontvvvvvv ldvJdvB ,.,
00
;
The modelling of AGB Stars atmospheres – heating and cooling
b.f. – blocking factor
= 0.4 =>
T=500K;T=3000K
14
1
1
11
)1()(
)1()(
..;
)(
4
44
4
,.,
4
.,
T
T
T
T
TTT
TTF
fbl
TFTBF
linesvcontvv
vv
contvv
The modelling of AGB Stars atmospheres – heating and cooling: temperature behaviour.
Ri – R at which cont. is formed (Teff).
Inserting into radiative equilibrium Equation:
For = const.
(grey atm.)
Ri/R=1/1.5 =>T=-500K
5.0
0
2
2
.,
84.0
0)(2
1)(
)(2
1
R
RTT
dvR
RTBTB
R
RTBJ
ieff
ieffvvv
ieffvv
contvv
dvJdvB vvvv
00
The modelling of AGB Stars atmospheres – heating and cooling: atmosphere extension
Atmosphere extension is caused by increase in opacity.
From hydrostatic equilibrium and definition of:
Radiatiative forces also affect the structure
Similary to the extension caused by H- the extension is caused by formation of new molecules (like TiO) (pulsations, turbulence)
dvFc
g
d
pd
drdgp
vv
0
1
;
The modelling of AGB Stars atmospheres – heating and cooling: atmosphere extension
AGB Stars: Physics and characteristic conditions – Scale Height due to turbulence
;
)(;;
2*
2
M
TR
mG
kH
ppppr
MGggp
H
turbradgas
Hydrostatic equilibrium
Scale Height:
Turbulent pressure
t ~ 0.5
Turbulence can extend atmosphere by about 50%
HHskmc
m
Tk
MG
RH
p
tst
ttH
t
ttt
5.1/5
22
*
2
AGB Stars: grid of static models• Model atmospheres are used for comparison between computed and observed spectra.
Stellar parameters, abundances. Tests of nucleosynthesis; chemical evolution of galaxies.
• There are 2 problems (even for static case with LTE for gas and radiative equilibrium):Completness of molecular data.Treatment of absorption (resolution).
•How many points do we need to resolve an AGB spectrum?
skmK
T
m
Tk
HH /
30008
8 21
21
For HCN mass is 27 times larger and <v>~1.5 km/s
From Doppler shift:
~<v>/c =5 10-6.
AGB Stars: methods to reduce number of frequencies.
• ODF – Divide spectrum into spectral intervals and transform opacity within each interval into Opacity Distribution Function (e.g. Gustafsson et al. 1975).About 500 intervals are needed to perform integrations in:Equation of motion
Radiative equilibrium dvSJ
dvFc
gp
vvv
vvgas
)(0
10
0
0
ODF method assumes that opacity does not depend on => not applicable in case of AGB stars!!!
AGB Stars: methods to reduce number of frequencies.
• OS – Opacity Sampling (e.g. Ekberg et al. 1986). A few thousand (randomly distributed over frequency) points are needed to get T with accuracy of about 50 K.Almost imposible to improve accuracy (err~1/sqrt(n))The most popular and (relatively) easy to generalize to (non-LTE):
i.e. To solve system of rate equations (statistical equilibrium)
ijijijij
ijijij CRPPnPn
;0)(
AGB Stars: grids of static models.
•Pioneering grid of static LTE models for AGB stars (M-type) – Tsuji (1978).•Other grids for M-stars: Brown et al. (1989)•For C-stars: Qerci et al. (1975), Kurucz (1979), Johnson (1982), Jorgensen et al. (1992), Plez et al. (1992)
•Presently, there are two groups announcing spherically symmetric, static models computed with OS: (Hauschild et al. 2002) and group which uses MARCS code (Edvardsson, Eriksson, Gustafsson, Jorgensen, Plez).
AGB Stars: grids of static models.
AGB Stars: grids of static models.
AGB Stars: grids of static models.
The newest models: Gustafsson et al. (2005)
AGB Stars: grids of static models.
AGB Stars: static models vs observations
For non-Miras agreement is reasonable: Serote Ross et al. (1996), Alvarez & Plez (1998)
AGB Stars: static models vs observations
For C-stars agreement in the ISO range has been achieved: Jorgensen (2000)
The modelling of AGB Stars atmospheres – Pulsations
•The subsonic motions induced by pulsating
interior generates sound waves.
•In the AGB atmospheres there is strong T and gradient.
•Parts of waves which are deeper (in hotter gas)
move faster => shock waves are generated.
•The strongly decreasing T and in the stellar
atmosphere enhance steepening of the shock waves.
Hs m
Tkc
The modelling of AGB Stars atmospheres – Pulsations
The modelling of AGB Stars atmospheres – Pulsations
•Movment of matter which has been hit by shock
wave can be approximated by „balistic” solution
(with variable „g”)
•However, in contrast with pure balistic solution,
the trajectories will not be symmetric (the radiation
pressure is changing).
0
2
0
max
0max 2;
r
GMu
u
u
r
rresc
esc
The modelling of AGB Stars atmospheres – Pulsations
Hoefner et al. (2003)
AGB Stars: dust formation
•Extended atmospheres of AGB stars are so cool and dense enough that dust can form.
•Kinetic description of grain formation => typical time scales.
KINETIC PICTURE
•With decreasing T increase amount of (complex) molecules.•Formation of cluster is possible (sticking and chemical reactions). This depends on thermodynamical conditions.•At some point when cluster of „critical size” is fomed it is more favorable energetically to add more molecules to it (nucleation theory – derived from chemical considerations).
•Any cluster larger than this „critical size” is a seed nucleus for a dust grain.
AGB Stars: dust formation
•The grain will grow until there is condensable material around and the condensation rate (Rcond) > the evaporation rate (Revap).
0
1)(4
48
22
222
dt
dN
R
RnaRRa
dt
dN
Ram
Tknana
cond
evapevapcond
condH
a – grain size; n – „monomers” number
N-number of „monomers” in grain
Dynamical equilibrium defines: equilibrium degree of condenstaion
Homogenous grain growth
AGB Stars: dust formation
•Too simlified picture: different „monomers” can stick to the grain, grain drift was neglected, sticking probability is not 1, Tdust may not be equal to Tgas.•Note that grain with a=0.01 m contains ~108 atoms!!!
growth
growth
cond
evapgrowth
cond
evapevapcond
Rdt
ad
a
aaNR
dt
dN
N
aa
R
RnaR
R
RnaRRa
dt
dN
3
1
;
;1
1)(4
1
32
331
21
22
A growth rate.
a1 – monomer radius
AGB Stars: dust formation
][102
104.1;106.2)(
)(
4.1)(
)(&10607.6
)(
)(
33
3
1
3
1
3
1
7
3
144
4
1
1
1
0
st
cm
gmn
Hn
Cn
On
Cn
Hn
On
Ra
aRat
tRdtRa
Rdt
ad
growth
HH
growthgrowthgrowth
growthgrowth
t
growth
growth
growth
Assumptions: enough of condensable material;
T=const => Rgrowth=const;
for t=0 (reduced) a~0
C is a monomer in C-rich stars. Monomer size
a1=1.29 10-8 [cm],
a/a1=5 102 ; Rcond>>Revap
For v=10 km/s r=2 1013 cm density drops by fact. 2
tpuls~1 year
AGB Stars: pulsations and dynamical models (Hoefner)
AGB Stars: dust formation
][102
104.1;106.2)(
)(
4.1)(
)(&10607.6
)(
)(
33
3
1
3
1
3
1
7
3
144
4
1
1
1
0
st
cm
gmn
On
Cn
On
Cn
Hn
On
Ra
aRat
tRdtRa
Rdt
ad
growth
HH
growthgrowthgrowth
growthgrowth
t
growth
growth
growth
Assumptions: enough of condensable material;
T=const => Rgrowth=const;
for t=0 (reduced) a~0
C is a monomer in C-rich stars. Monomer size
a1=1.29 10-8 [cm], a/a1=5
102 ; Rcond>>Revap
For v=10 km/s r=2 1013 cm density drops by fact. 2
tpuls~1 year
AGB Stars: Physics and characteristic conditions – Pulsations and dust formation
0
3
2
0
)()(;
),(),(;)(),()(
daanaQa
QconstQa
aQaaCdaanaC
oext
extoext
extextext
•Timescale for grain growth are comparable to timescale of pulsations and to timescale of dynamical changes in the outer atmosphere – non-equilibrium process. •Dust, if formed (low T and „large density”), interact with radiation much more efficiently than molecules.• Radiation pressure on dust my overcame gravitation.• •How much dust is needed to drive a stellar wind?
AGB Stars: dust – radiation interaction
L
M
Q
Gc
L
MGc
Q
daana
dF
dF
L
MGc
r
MG
rc
L
oext
bulkd
bulk
oext
d
bulkd
3
16
44
3
)(3
4
)(
)()(
44
3
22
Assumptions: dust and gas a coupled (no drift).
We demand that the radiative acceleration is large enough to overcome gravity
bulk=2 g/cm3; <Qext>=5 103 cm-1
M=1Mo, L=5 103 Lo => d/
> 1.4 10-3
Overestimated since other forces also counteract gravity
AGB Stars: model atmospheres for pulsating
stars
Hoefner et al. (1997)
Bowen (1988)
Sedlmayer
Hoefner