’h2020 –muligheder for anis’...28/09/2017 22 wp1: link between activities and timing wp1 -task...

’H2020 – muligheder for ANIS’

Tre punkter:• Gode og dårlige erfaringer ved skrivning af ansøgninger til EU’s rammeprogram. v/Knud Erik Bach Knudsen

• Erfaringer i.f.m. nyligt indsendt H2020/ansøgning. v/Charlotte Lauridsen.

• H2020 – Arbejdsprogrammet. Drøftelse omkring muligheder for ANIS. v/Alle.

• Hvis koordinator tanke, så husk:EUopStart: Deadline mht. stage 1: 30 oktober

Indlæg vedr.‐ H2020 Muligheder for ANIS

VIP‐møde p.v.a. Forsknings‐ og ErhvervsudvalgeneV/Charlotte Lauridsen

Mine erfaringer som projekt koordinator

• Indsendt Stage II ansøgning d. 13/9‐2017• Konsortiet består af 13 partnere fra 8 lande• Mix af universiteter, NGO’er, forskningsinstitutioner og industri.• Total budget 4 mill. Euros• Fra AU: ANIS, ICROFS, AGRO• EXCISIONS:‐ EXcluding Contentious InputS In OrgaNic Systems

Hvor lang tid tager det som koordinerende partner for en ansøgning?

Stage 1 (> 2 mdr.): 10 sider • Juni 2016: Dagsmøde 1 i potentielt konsortium

• Juli til December 2016: konsortiet dannes endeligt, de enkelte partneres bidrag skitseres, ideer til WPs skitseres, mange telefonsamtaler/møder

• Januar – Februar 2017: Dagsmøde 2 om draft 1 ansøgning (Fokus på ‘Excellence’), og intensivt skriveri

Stage 2 (>3 mdr.): 70 sider (annex 1‐3)• Maj 2017: Vi var inviteret til Stage II• Juni 2017: Forberedelse til dagsmøde III (‘hvad vil enkelte partnere bidrage med, og deres roller’)

• Juli‐September, 2017:Partnerbeskrivelse. Skrivning af WPs mv. (= implementation), og Impact samt revidering af Excellence del. BudgetInternt/externt review af ansøgning

Hvad brugte jeg af support fra AU?• AU Research Support and External Relations (stor hjælp omkring budget (samling fra partnere, diverse

tabeller til alt andet (partner beskrivelse), samt gode råd. Upload af ansøgning ‐dokumenter og skabeloner:• ‐ skabelon til section 1‐3• ‐ skabelon til section 4‐5• ‐ budgetskabelon • Tidsplan (generel oversigt over opgaver, som kan bruges til inspiration)• ‐ skabelon til partnerbeskrivelse• ‐ partnerbeskrivelse for AU (denne kan bruges som inspiration, men skal selvfølgelig udbygges med relevant

tekst ift. ANIS)

VIGTIGT:• AU Impact guide (relevant vedr. skrivning af fuld ansøgning):

http://medarbejdere.au.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/AU_IMPACT_191216.pdf

Se e‐mail sendt fra Jan Nørgaard i aftes: Endeligt program i oktober

Knud Erik Bach KnudsenDepartment of Animal Science

AARHUSUNIVERSITY September 21 2017

Gode og dårlige erfaringer ved skrivning af ansøgninger til EU’s rammeprogram

AARHUSUNIVERSITY

September 21 2017

AARHUSUNIVERSITY

September 21 2017

Erfaringsgrundlag

›H2020 programmet: Feed‐a‐Gene›FP7 programmet: DELIVER›FP6 programmet: HealthGrain

FittedFeed ‐> Feed‐a‐Gene1st Consortium Meeting

‐INRA Transfert

‐Paris – 15/01/2014

Agenda• 9:15 – 9:30 Brief self presentation of partners• 9:30 – 9:45 H2020 structure and role of INRA Transfert• 9:45 – 10:05 Background of the building of the project and General

presentation of the concept proposed by the Coordinator• 10:05 – 11:30 Discussion

– Common understanding of the call– Key questions the project should answer– How will this particular proposal contribute towards solving the problems? What would be

the innovative issues?– Specific approaches / concepts to tackle the topics addressed– Livestock production systems and time scales to be covered by the project– Innovative technologies to be developed and demonstrated by the project– Geographic scope

• 11:30 – 11:45 Presentation of the proposed structure of the project• 11:45 – 12:15 Discussion

• 12:15 – 13:30 Lunch

• 13:30 – 15:30 WORKPACKAGES Definition: proposition of objectives, activities, outcomes, contributing partners [15min par WP]

• 15:30 – 15:45 Additional Partners and choice of WP leaders• 15:45 – 16:00 Action Plan of the project building

INRA Transfert• Subsidiary of INRA specialised in project management and

technology transfer• Helps to build up, negotiate and manage EU‐funded project

(= interface between Partners and the EC)• Average success rate during FP7 = 50%• Currently manages 34 EU and national projects• Tasks in building the project:

1. Provide strategic advice• Definition of objectives and structure of the project• Consortium setup• Budget setup• Help writing « general parts » of the call

2. Administrative support• Collect and compile partners’ contributions• EC online forms

3. Logistic support• Preparation, moderation and follow‐up of meetings

Building Strategy for 2 steps proposals

15 pages(excellence

and impacts only)

12 March 20141st Stage

70 pages(full proposals)

26 June20142nd Stage

Proposal building – 2 versions built in parallel

May 2014

Content of the 15 pages proposal:1‐Excellence1.1‐Objectives1.2‐Relation to the work programme1.3‐Concept and approach1.4‐Ambition (= progress beyond the state‐of‐the‐art2‐Impact (how the project will contribute to the impacts listed in the topic)

Analysis of the topic• 3 rules:Answer to the proposed topicThe EC knows what it want. You can disagree but it the EC who pays.

Answer to the proposed topicThe correspondance must be complete, not with the help of future developments or complex justifications.

Answer to the proposed topicThe correspondance must be 100%, not focusing onlyon a few words.

• Do not try to adapt a project to a topic

Analysis of the topicSocietal Challenge 2 on ‘Food security, sustainable agriculture and forestry, marine and maritime and inland water research and the bioeconomy’

Call for Sustainable Food Security Sustainable food production systems

Domain

Topic

Policy expectations

Borders of the topic

Level of TRL requested

Information about the consortium: geographic and types of partners

Expected outputs

Challenge

Expected outputs

Analysis of the topic

Funding

Instrument

Expected Impact

WP1Alternative feeds and real‐

time characterization

WP2New traits for feed

efficiency

WP3Modelling feed use

mechanisms

WP7Dissemination, training and technology transfer WP8

Management

WP4Management system for

precision feeding

WP6Sustainability assessment of the production system

‐ New feed technologies‐ Data on new feeds and local resources‐ Real‐time characterization of feed

‐ Models of feed use by animals‐ Data on nutrientrequirements

‐ Data on innovative management systems‐ New ways to exploit individual variability

‐ Consumer and farmerexpectations and acceptance

‐ Data on feedefficiency of animals

WP5Use of traits in genetic

selection

‐ Identify individual variability‐ Data on animal behaviour and health status

8

FittedFeed

Research1 – INRA2 – WUR3 – Newcastle University4 – UdL5 – IRTA6 – Kaposvár University7 – AU8 – China?

Extension22 – ACTA23 ‐ AFZ

Management24 – IT

7

4

3

24

2

1

10

236

5

9

Technology suppliers9 – Topigs10 – FOSS?11 – Roquette ?

End‐Users12 –

China

22

11

Consortium

Roadmap

15 January: 1st Consortium meeting20 January: Coordinator proposes a budget distribution by WP (INRA)27 January: ‐ Partner contribu ons sent to WP leaders (All → WP

leaders)‐ Proposition of writing of the general parts by the Coordinator (INRA & IT)

28 or 29 January?: ‐ Phone conference between WP leaders to define missing competences and select additional partners to be integrated in the consortium (WP leaders)

5 February: ‐ WP Descrip on (WP leaders → INRA & IT)‐ WP Leaders propose a budget distribution per Partner in function of the tasks proposed (WP leaders Partners)‐ Feedback of the Partners on the general parts (All)

7 February: First consolidated version (INRA & IT → All)10 or 11 February?: 2nd Consortium Meeting by phone (WP leaders)24 February: ‐ WP leaders and partners’ feedbacks (All → INRA & IT)

‐ Budget by partner (All)26 February: Second consolidated version (INRA & IT)27 or 28 February?: Phone meeting (WP leaders)4 March: WP leaders and partners’ feedbacks (All → INRA & IT)5 March: ‐ First proposal submission to the EC (IT)

‐ Improvement iterations up to the final submission (All→ IT)

Technical con

tent –WP de

scrip

tion

12-03-2014

15-01-2014

Gen

eral parts in

clud

ing im

pacts

Budg

etAd

ministrativ

e form

s

€10 MBudget€10 MBudget

EU funded Research

project

EU funded Research

project

2015202020152020

8Academic

8Academic

15Industry + Extension

15Industry + Extension

23Partners

EU + China

23Partners

EU + China

Adapting the feed, the animal and the feeding techniques to improve the

efficiency and sustainability of monogastric livestock production

systems

Adapting the feed, the animal and the feeding techniquesto improve the efficiency and sustainability of monogastriclivestock production systems

28/09/2017 15

WP1Alternative feed ingredients and real‐time characterization


efficiency

WP3Modelling feed use mechanisms

WP8Management


precision feeding


‐ New feed processing and enzyme technologies‐ Data on new feeds and local resources

‐ Tools for real‐time characterization of feed


WP5Use of traits in genetic selection

Consumer and farmerexpectations and acceptance

‐ New traits to identify individual variability‐ Data on animal behaviour and health status

‐ Models of feed use by animals‐ Data on nutrient requirements

WP7Dissemination, training and technology transfer

Data on feedefficiency of animals

Data on new feeds and local

resources

Data exchange

Data exchange

Feed‐a‐Gene


28/09/2017 17

Project partners


28/09/2017 18

Project partners


28/09/2017 19

Feed-a-Gene – ExCom committeeCoordinator: Jaap Van Milgen - INRAWP leaders:

WP1: Knud Erik Bach Knudsen, AUWP2: Alfons Jansman, WURWP3: Veronika Halas, KUWP4: Jesús Pomar, UdLWP5: Hélène Gilbert, INRAWP6: Guy Garrod, UNewWP7: Gilles Tran, AFZWP8: Vincent Troillard, INRA


28/09/2017 20

Kick-off meeting in Paris

20


28/09/2017 21

WP1Alternative feed ingredients and real‐time characterization


efficiency

WP3Modelling feed use mechanisms

WP8Management


precision feeding


‐ New feed processing and enzyme technologies‐ Data on new feeds and local resources

‐ Tools for real‐time characterization of feed


WP5Use of traits in genetic selection

Consumer and farmerexpectations and acceptance

‐ New traits to identify individual variability‐ Data on animal behaviour and health status

‐ Models of feed use by animals‐ Data on nutrient requirements

WP7Dissemination, training and technology transfer

Data on feedefficiency of animals

Data on new feeds and local

resources

Data exchange

Data exchange

Feed‐a‐Gene


28/09/2017 22

WP1: Link between activities and timing

WP1 - Task 1.4: Nutritional evaluation of novel feed ingredients

M12-48

WP1 - Task 1.6: New methodologies for

characterisation of nutrient composition and value

M1-54

WP1 - Task 1.5: Improvements in nutritive

value by use of novel enzymesM12-54

WP1 - Task 1.2: Production of protein from

green biomassM12-48

WP1 - Task 1.1: Production of protein from rapeseed and

soybeansM1-36

WP1 - Task 1.3: Novel feed processing

technology to upgrade

M6-48

WP2 & 5

WP3 & 6

HNL5

Slide nummer 22

HNL5 If this slide is going to be used for the WP in general, there should also be arrows from Task 1.1., 1.2 and 1.3 to Task 1.6. And additionally reach-out arrows to other WPsHelle Nygaard Lærke; 27-05-2015

AARHUSUNIVERSITY

September 21 2017

KBBE.2012.1.3-03: Monogastrics Feed Efficiency - Efficiency of livestock digestive systems and reduction of the ecological footprint through a combination of systems biology, 'omics' and nutrition Call: FP7-KBBE-2012-6There is pressure to improve the efficiency and welfare in livestock production while reducing the environmental footprint of the sector and against a backdrop of increasing global demand for animal products. A key element of Europe 2020 is the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, and phosphorus pollution is a serious concern.The gut is responsible for the efficient digestion and absorption of feed and nutrients, however the biochemical and microbial processes in the gut and the excreta also result in the production of greenhouse gases, or excretion of phosphates and nitrates. Both the microbial flora of the gut and feeding regime exert a profound influence on digestive efficiency and greenhouse gas production. Increased understanding of the biology of the monogastric gut and excreta will offer new approaches to improve nutrient utilization, feed efficiency whilst simultaneously reducing greenhouse gas emission.The proposed project will bring together systems biology, microbiology and genetics of both host and microflora, and where appropriate metagenomics to better understand the network of interactions between gut microflora, feed regime, and the host genome. The project will determine how these interactions influence nutrient utilization, feed efficiency, greenhouse gas production, and product quality. The project will target at least pigs and poultry. The interactions with animal behaviour, health and welfare should also be taken into consideration.Funding Scheme: Collaborative Project (large-scale integrating project targeted to SMEs). Additional eligibility criteria: The requested European Union contribution shall not exceed EUR 6 000 000 per proposal.SME-targeted Collaborative Projects will only be selected for funding on the condition that the estimated EU contribution going to SME(s) is 15 % or more of the total estimated EU contribution for the project as a whole. This will be assessed at the end of the negotiation, before signature of the grant agreement. Proposals not fulfilling this criterion will not be funded.Additional information: One project may be funded.Expected impact: The expected outcomes of this research are improved understanding of the variation in the monogastric digestive system, new systems models and tools applicable to selective breeding and nutrition for improved gut health and functionality, reduced greenhouse gas emission and improved product quality. This is a multi-disciplinary project which will improve collaboration between different disciplines of animal production.

Call text for DELIVER

AARHUSUNIVERSITY

September 21 2017

Ecological footprint

microbiota

hostfeedFeed Manuregut

understanding variation

methods and toolsnutrition and breeding

gut health, functionalityreduced emissions

Proposed Work Packages

1) Host

2) Microbes

3) Gut processes

4) Models

5) Tools

6) Training

7) Management

Host Microbes

Gut

Models Tools

Understanding of the variation

models and tools

AARHUSUNIVERSITY

September 21 2017

FP6 – HealthGrain 2005‐2010›Organiseret af VTT i Finland› Initierende møder i 2003› Interessetilkendegivelse›Ansøgning›Kick‐off møde i 2005

AARHUSUNIVERSITY

September 21 2017

HealthGrain projektet

’h2020 –muligheder for anis’...28/09/2017 22 wp1: link between activities and timing wp1 -task...

Documents