7
Proposed new IC A N N stru ctu re U nofficialchart follow ing the 23 O ctober ER C report 6 SO -appointed directors 6 non-voting liaisons ICANN Nom inating Committee 8 N om C om -appointed directors ASO Council: 3APNIC 3ARIN 3 ) RIPE NCC GNSO Council: (initially3each) 2gTLD registrars 2gTLD registries 2business 2ISPs 2non-commercial 2intellectual property 3Nom Com-selected “to besupplied” AddressSupporting Organization (ASO) Generic Nam es SO (GNSO) Country-codeNam es SO (CCNSO) Root ServerSystem AdvisoryCom ittee (RSSAC) Securityand StabilityAdvisory Committee(SAC) Governm ental AdvisoryCom m ittee(GAC) At LargeAdvisoryCom m ittee(ALAC) CEO app.by Board app. byIETF app. byTLG app.by Advisory C om m ittees Technical Liaison Group (TLG) [email protected]

Upload: aizza

Post on 07-Jan-2016

35 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

[email protected]. The ICANN Nominating Committee. Unofficial chart following the 23 October ERC report. Chair. (app. by. Board). Root. Security. previous. Server. Advisory. NomCom. System. Comm. Chair. Adv. C. Internet. intell. large. small. service. property. business. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: alexander@svensson.de

Proposed new ICANN structureUnofficial chart following the 23 October ERC report

6 SO-appointed directors 6 non-voting liaisons

ICANN NominatingCommittee

8 NomCom-appointed directors

ASO Council:3 APNIC3 ARIN3 )RIPE NCC

GNSO Council:(initially 3 each)2 gTLD registrars2 gTLD registries

2 business2 ISPs2 non-commercial2 intellectual property

3 NomCom-selected

“to be supplied”

Address SupportingOrganization (ASO)

Generic Names SO(GNSO)

Country-code NamesSO (CCNSO)

Root Server System Advisory Comittee (RSSAC)

Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SAC)

Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC)

At Large Advisory Committee (ALAC)

CEO app. byBoard

app.

by IETF

app.

by TLG

app. by Advisory Committees

Technical Liaison Group (TLG)

[email protected]

Page 2: alexander@svensson.de

SecurityAdvisoryComm.

RootServerSystemAdv. C.

Internetservice

providers

IETFTechnicalLiaisonGroup

Governm.AdvisoryComm.

At LargeAdvisoryComm.

At LargeAdvisoryComm.

At LargeAdvisoryComm.

At LargeAdvisoryComm.

At LargeAdvisoryComm.

gTLDregistries

gTLDregistrars

ccNSOCouncil

addressregistries

academic,publicentities

consumer,civ. soc.groups

intell.propertyinterests

Chair(app. byBoard)

largebusiness

users

smallbusiness

users

previousNomCom

Chair

The ICANN Nominating CommitteeUnofficial chart following the 23 October ERC report

[email protected]

Page 3: alexander@svensson.de

NominatingCommittee

ICANN Board NominatingCommittee

Regional At-LargeOrganization

Regional At-LargeOrganization

Regional At-LargeOrganization

Regional At-LargeOrganization

Regional At-LargeOrganization

At Large structures

At Large Advisory Councilselects 5ALAC members

selects 5NomCommembers

appointsnon-votingBoard liaison

I CANN At Large participationUnofficial chart following the 23 October ERC report

[email protected]

Page 4: alexander@svensson.de

number of votes

gTLDregistrars

gTLDregistrars

business/commercial

business/commercial

intellectualproperty

intellectualproperty

not under ICANN contract:under ICANN contract:

NomCom-selected

NomCom-selected

NomCom-selected

non-comm.domainholders

non-comm.domainholders

Internetservice

providers

Internetservice

providers

gTLDregistries

gTLDregistries

GAC liaison(possible)

GNSO CouncilUnofficial chart following the 23 October ERC report

[email protected]

Page 5: alexander@svensson.de

gTLDregistrars

gTLDregistrars

gTLDregistrars

business/commercial

business/commercial

business/commercial

intellectualproperty

intellectualproperty

intellectualproperty

not under ICANN contract:under ICANN contract:

NomCom-selected

NomCom-selected

NomCom-selected

non-comm.domainholders

non-comm.domainholders

non-comm.domainholders

Internetservice

providers

Internetservice

providers

Internetservice

providers

gTLDregistries

gTLDregistries

gTLDregistries

gTLDregistries

GAC liaison(possible)

“The Transition Article will provide that each constituency has ; this will be evaluated

in the GNSO review conducted after one year.“three representatives for the first year

GNSO Council (transitional)Unofficial chart following the 23 October ERC report

number of votes

[email protected]

Page 6: alexander@svensson.de

Issue Report (by Staff)With recommendation on process initiation

and General Counsel opinion on proper scope

Council vote on initiation

Policy Development Process

Raising issues

Board AdvisoryCommittees GNSO Council

Task Force approach Approach without Task Forces

Board vote, enactment

Board referrals:Process initiated

without vote

> 33% of Councilmembers neededto initiate process

> 66% neededif Staff states issue is out of ICANN scope

>>

>>

Majority vote of the Boardunless disagreement withCouncil supermajority vote

Special process in case ofdisagreement with

Council supermajority vote

GNSO PolicyDevelopment ProcessUnofficial chart following the 23 October ERC report

[email protected]

Page 7: alexander@svensson.de

Reconsideration Any person materially affected may request review or reconsideration of- staff (in)actions contradicting ICANN policies- board (in)actions without consideration of material information

Any affected party may request independent review of Board actionsalleged to be inconsistent with theArticles of Incorporation or Bylaws

Affected members of the ICANNCommunity may voice problems, concernsor complaints about ICANN which havenot otherwise become the subject ofreconsideration or independent review

Decision by Reconsideration Committeeof not less than three Board directors;normal administrative costs (notextraordinary costs) absorbed by ICANN

Decision by panel appointed by aninternational arbitration provider;the party not prevailing bears all costs of the arbitration provider; each partyshall bear its own expenses

Office of Ombudsman shall facilitate the fair, impartial, and timely resolution of problems and complaintsand advise complainants about the various options available for review

IndependentReview

Ombudsman

>

>

>

Reconsideration, review and ombudsmanUnofficial chart following the 23 October ERC report

[email protected]