彭義德 璞玉第7次專案小組 141017v3
Post on 03-Aug-2015
86 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
1. vs 710.17.20141 2. 2300/80002 3. 3 4. 4 5. 5 6. 6 7. 7 8. 8 9. 9 10. 10 11. 11 12. 51818512 13. 13 14. 14 15. 15 16. 16 17. 17 18. 18 19. 19 20. 20 21. 21 22. 22 23. 2300/8000!23 24. Berman v. ParkerDistrict of Columbia Redevelopment Act 9:024 25. If owner after owner were permitted to resist theseredevelopment programs on the ground that hisparticular property was not being used against thepublic interest, integrated plans for redevelopmentwould suffer greatly. (US Supreme Court)25 26. 26 27. ~ The End ~27 28. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7gdS7bqWRo28
top related