اﻟﺘﻨور اﻟﻔﻴزﻴﺎﺌﻲ - جامعة أم القرى.pdf
Post on 19-Dec-2015
245 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
^^^^^^^^^^^k@^^ ^^^^^^^^^A@-j^^ ^^^^^^^^^
A^^^^^^^^^^^^^@OA^^^^^^^^^^^^^k@gd@cA^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^H@
mgd^^ ^Lh^^ ^}VA^^ ^l^^ ^-^^ ^@
xM@Aj@gM@cAHBWAMAj@
dhpcA@tAI@KAlM@
c@dFJA@
p@HgdITd
@h^^oFgMd@
_sA@dB
MlTA@Tgct@OAIMAMk@RYI@@fd jHk@AAHH@H@mgdLh}VA@
id6034046 pdfMachine by Broadgun Software - a great PDF writer! - a great PDF creator! - http://www.pdfmachine.com http://www.broadgun.com
-
AAEAAABEEEAAA_AA(Al@gkD+9
-
AfA
jA GB B f_N C A Dn_ n AfqAfrA f JN C Ni mAI.
BJzA a zIAjA A h emC G.
BA ZvBI A BN BA J jA fA G
ffA jA)A C KA IC.(
G Uk YAjA Jm M AfU jafM
BABYA .
U A Y BJYA eC GAjag m
nA.
aC AaG GAA Y M.
B A K GByiBM BZJm A .
B GyANA fA Ah fC########
-
hohdK
AAAEAEABEAAEEA:AAAA:AAEA_AAEAEEEE=
j:q
/ _BA f_C `u 5
f q IC
s_ie B_
-
0.05
75
0.05
t)
-
.
-
PB________yA pj____
______yA___________________________________________ iZvA
A vA:mAifA aBNC
BRA vA :jA iBA
A iA :A iNA
-
BRA iA :BlA I ONA B iBr
(PSSC)
iASBRA :BlA iNA
SBRA vA :IBm PBmAie
IAjA vA:A PAAjUGmAif
-
oBA vA:mAifA WBN BNrB
-
A BAf
ifA f________________A B____________________I
iZvA
-
YA B
iZA ____________ZA B____________________I
iZvA
-
k@gd@d
k@gd@p
k@gd@|h
k@gd@@dB
k@gd@B
k@gd@cdX
k@gd@OAYt
-
A vA BNC mAifA a
fmAifA
1989:3
Maarschalk, 1986:353
-
(O'Hearn, 1976:107)
2003:46
(1986:353) Maarschalk
-
20002001
20001996
-
0.05
-
2009-2008
-
2009-2008
-
@g@9@gM@
AQ@g@9@Aj@HNM@@OAhp
RAQ@g@9Aj@gM@
-
Maarschalk
-
146:1993
Science Education
(20:
-
Scientific Literacy
STSScience Technology & Society
Science for All Americans "AAAS"
American Association for the Advancement of Science(AAAS)
National Science Education Standards (NSES)
Scope, Sequence & Coordination (SS&C)
(2
-
Rubb,& Anderson, 1978
AAAS
:1990
-
Showalter1974:450)
Collette & Chiapetta (1984:4
-
Mitman (1987:623
BSCS2
BSCS
2Biological Science Curriculum Study
-
1997(Jegede
Nature of ScienceKey Science Concepts(STS)(STSE)processes of Science Scientific and Technical SkillsRelated Interests and Attitudes
ScienceValues That Underlie Science
-
pella:97 Olorundare1988:151
:1989
-
agin,1974:403
O'Hearn,1976:103
-
agin1974:403
Scientifically Literate
-
:41) Hinman
(A.A.A.S,1989:318)
-
!!
-
PSSC
(PSSC)
Collette Collett,1973:112
Hober,1967:418)
Collett, 1973:112)
-
.RutherfordF.watson G.Holten
!
(Harvard,1975:111)
-
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!
-
Sciences For All
-
Technoloyy High
super conductivity
Jennisons,1998
.
Nature
-
physics Facts
physics Concepts
-
physics Principles (Generalization)
physics Laws
physics Theories
-
3
-
@g@9@gM@MlnANALOAk@gc
AQ@g@9w@VAhLLNALOAk@gc @gM@hsA
@HAl@OAk@gd@JM-
-
SBRA vA IBm PBmAie
-
STS
STS
-
1999
100200
70
1996
-
1995
97215
41.975
-
k@gd@V
k@gd@M
k@gd@
k@gd@O@cB
Aj@gM@cAHCHAAHO@`
O@`k@gd@
AtX@JAk@
-
IAjA vA mAifA PAAjUG
1997:41
2009-2008)
1 5 194 2 3 107 3 2 78
10 379
-
4 156 5 2 67 6 2 61 7 3 91 8 2 64
439
2 818
Simple Random
Sample
@>
@>
-
% % %100
35
3Physics Grades Nine Through Twelve, California Science Content Standards
-
200557: :
-
2009-2008)
-
Holsti
.9
-
x
x
-
1 0.63 22 0.56 43 0.63 2 0.69 23 0.69 44 0.38 3 0.69 24 0.50 45 0.69 4 0.69 25 0.63 46 0.63 5 0.69 26 0.63 47 0.63 6 0.69 27 0.44 48 0.63 7 0.63 28 0.38 49 0.56 8 0.63 29 0.38 50 0.50 9 0.69 30 0.56 51 0.63 10 0.75 31 0.31 52 0.56 11 0.69 32 0.63 53 0.50 12 0.56 33 0.50 54 0.56 13 0.63 34 0.56 55 0.44 14 0.50 35 0.69 56 0.50 15 0.69 36 0.63 57 0.50 16 0.75 37 0.63 58 0.63 17 0.63 38 0.50 59 0.56 18 0.69 39 0.56 60 0.44 19 0.56 40 0.44 61 0.63 20 0.63 41 0.44 62 0.25 21 0.69 42 0.56
-
1 0.75 22 0.63 43 0.75 2 0.63 23 0.63 44 0.50 3 0.63 24 0.50 45 0.63 4 0.63 25 0.50 46 0.75 5 0.63 26 0.25 47 0.75 6 0.63 27 0.63 48 0.75 7 0.75 28 0.75 49 0.63 8 0.75 29 0.75 50 0.25 9 0.38 30 0.63 51 0.75 10 0.50 31 0.63 52 0.38 11 0.63 32 0.50 53 0.50 12 0.63 33 0.75 54 0.38 13 0.75 34 0.63 55 0.38 14 0.25 35 0.63 56 0.25 15 0.38 36 0.75 57 0.25 16 0.50 37 0.75 58 0.25 17 0.75 38 0.50 59 0.38 18 0.63 39 0.63 60 0.38 19 0.63 40 0.38 61 0.25 20 0.50 41 0.38 62 0.50 21 0.63 42 0.63
-
...
Test Validity
Referees' Validity
Internal Consistency Validity
SPSS
-
1 0.580 32 0.829 2 0.867 33 0.871 3 0.872 34 0.825 4 0.759 35 0.818 5 0.719 36 0.706 6 0.677 37 0.911 7 0.802 38 0.831 8 0.604 39 0.816 9 0.706 40 0.923 10 0.767 41 0.568 11 0.857 42 0.959 12 0.754 43 0.722 13 0.802 44 0.871 14 0.903 45 0.854 15 0.878 46 0.698 16 0.868 47 0.490 17 0.733 48 0.777 18 0.870 49 0.440 19 0.753 50 0.389 20 0.789 51 0.564 21 0.599 52 0.402 22 0.719 53 0.377 23 0.738 54 0.554 24 0.536 55 0.524 25 0.655 56 0.488 26 0.470 57 0.461 27 0.748 58 0.420 28 0.920 59 0.389 29 0.847 60 0.367 30 0.709 61 0.494 31 0.796 62 0.499
-
Test Reliability
Split Half Method
Cronboch Alfa
.
Richardson and Kuder
-
- 1=
62 455.41 35.633 0.983
0.983
-
1
3,15,27,47 4 6.45%
2,6,7,14,23,24,28,52 12.9%
8,9,11,13,16,21,26,29,44, ,57,62 11 17.74%
30,41,53,54,55,56 6 9.67%
17,31,32,33,34,43,49,58,61 9 14.51%
2
1,5,10,18,45,50,59,60 8 12.9%
3
42,22,19,37,4,35, 6 9.67%
4
48,36,51,25 4 6.45%
5 38,39,12,20,40,46 6 9.67%
6 62 100%
-
(SPSS
-
SPSS
One-SampleT.Test
T.test independent sample
-
@@lAHM@VAM@AMpA
AQ@@lAHM@VAM@AMpA
M@VAM@AMpA@|hAH
M@VAM@AMpAAQ@|hAH
k@gd@OAsL
k@gd@OAX
-
oBA vA mAifA WBNBNrB
-
.
-
.95
.
-
.
-
.
-
1 101 199 199 0.663 0.473 66.33 1 2 173 127 127 0.423 0.495 42.33 11 3 226 74 74 0.247 0.432 24.67 48 4 112 188 188 0.627 0.484 62.67 2 5 176 124 124 0.413 0.493 41.33 14 6 132 168 168 0.560 0.497 56.00 4 7 132 168 168 0.560 0.497 56.00 5 8 231 69 69 0.230 0.422 23.00 51 9 145 155 155 0.517 0.501 51.67 6
10 118 182 182 0.607 0.489 60.67 3 11 157 143 143 0.477 0.500 47.67 7 12 191 109 109 0.363 0.482 36.33 24 13 243 57 57 0.190 0.393 19.00 54 14 176 124 124 0.413 0.493 41.33 13 15 185 115 115 0.383 0.487 38.33 20 16 223 77 77 0.257 0.438 25.67 45 17 216 84 84 0.280 0.450 28.00 41 18 174 126 126 0.420 0.494 42.00 12 19 157 143 143 0.477 0.500 47.67 8 20 198 102 102 0.340 0.475 34.00 27 21 183 117 117 0.390 0.489 39.00 19 22 178 122 122 0.407 0.492 40.67 15
-
23 220 80 80 0.267 0.443 26.67 44 24 235 65 65 0.217 0.413 21.67 52 25 178 122 122 0.407 0.492 40.67 16 26 226 74 74 0.247 0.432 24.67 47 27 180 120 120 0.400 0.491 40.00 18 28 265 35 35 0.117 0.322 11.67 62 29 191 109 109 0.363 0.482 36.33 25 30 194 106 106 0.353 0.479 35.33 26 31 199 101 101 0.337 0.473 33.67 28 32 207 93 93 0.310 0.463 31.00 34 33 212 88 88 0.293 0.456 29.33 39 34 248 52 52 0.173 0.379 17.33 58 35 212 88 88 0.293 0.456 29.33 38 36 205 95 95 0.317 0.466 31.67 32 37 170 130 130 0.433 0.496 43.33 10 38 191 109 109 0.363 0.482 36.33 23 39 210 90 90 0.300 0.459 30.00 36 40 187 113 113 0.377 0.485 37.67 21 41 166 134 134 0.447 0.498 44.67 9 42 219 81 81 0.270 0.445 27.00 43 43 190 110 110 0.367 0.483 36.67 22 44 263 37 37 0.123 0.329 12.33 61 45 217 83 83 0.277 0.448 27.67 42 46 214 86 86 0.287 0.453 28.67 40 47 246 54 54 0.180 0.385 18.00 56 48 249 51 51 0.170 0.376 17.00 59 49 228 72 72 0.240 0.428 24.00 49 50 206 94 94 0.313 0.465 31.33 33 51 202 98 98 0.327 0.470 32.67 29 52 212 88 88 0.293 0.456 29.33 37 53 257 43 43 0.143 0.351 14.33 60 54 209 91 91 0.303 0.460 30.33 35 55 241 59 59 0.197 0.398 19.67 53 56 224 76 76 0.253 0.436 25.33 46 57 179 121 121 0.403 0.491 40.33 17 58 247 53 53 0.177 0.382 17.67 57 59 203 97 97 0.323 0.469 32.33 31 60 202 98 98 0.327 0.470 32.67 30 61 229 71 71 0.237 0.426 23.67 50 62 245 55 55 0.183 0.388 18.33 55
6195 20.650 6.283 33.31
-
66.33
62.67
12.33
11.67
t.test one sample
-
( 0.05 ) ( 0.01 )
4 1.210 3.000 1.790 0.914 30.25 33.922
0.000
8 2.850 6.000 3.150 1.454 35.63 37.520 855 0.000
11 3.380 8.250 4.870 1.546 30.73 54.559 1014 0.000
6 1.697 4.500 2.803 1.093 28.28 44.412 509 0.000
9 2.413 6.750 4.337 1.289 26.81 58.275 724 0.000
8 3.343 6.000 2.657 1.564 41.79 29.416
1003 0.000
42 13.683 31.500 17.817 3.965 32.58 77.827 4105 0.000
6 725
2.507 4.500 1.993 1.443 41.78 23.919
0.000
4 366
1.220 3.000 1.780 1.087 30.50 28.355
0.000
6 609
2.030 4.500 2.470 1.502 33.83 28.479
0.000
62 6195
20.650 46.500 25.850 6.283 33.31 71.265
0.000
-
0.05
-
(0.05 )
t.test independent sample
154 1.182 0.889
146 1.240 0.9420.268
0.548
0.584
154 2.864 1.396
146 2.836 1.5180.200
0.167
0.868
154 3.416 1.583
146 3.342 1.5110.423
0.409
0.683
154 1.643 1.064 146 1.753 1.124
0.966
0.875
0.382
154 2.383 1.324
146 2.445 1.2540.302
0.416
0.677
154 3.253 1.679 146 3.438 1.433
0.012
1.025
0.306
154 13.558 4.090
146 13.815 3.838
0.388
0.560
0.576
154 2.442 1.400
146 2.575 1.489
0.363
0.802
0.423
-
154 1.214 1.072
146 1.226 1.107
0.805
0.093
0.926
154 2.130 1.516
146 1.925 1.4860.662
1.183
0.238
154 20.526 6.453 146 20.781 6.118
0.483
0.351
0.726
( 0.05 )( 0.05 )
-
( 0.05 )
-
A
2001
2006
2004
1982
1996
-
2003
2001
1998
2003
1998
-
199519
2000
313
-
1990
13-5 2002
1990
25138-131
-
2001
2002
31-28130-89
2003
-
2004
-
1996
1992
1995
-
1995
199713-10
2003V
-
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1989) Science for All Americans, Project(2061),Report on literacy Goals in Science ,Mathematics and technology, D.C. Publication ,Washigton.
Agin, M.L., Education for scientific literacy : Aconceptual frame Reference and some Applications."Science Education,Vol.58,No.3 ,1974,pp.403-415
Biological Science Curriculum study (BSCS)(1988):Advances in Genetic Technology ,Lexington ,MASS D.C. Heath.
Collett, A.T. Science Teaching in Secondary School Aguide for Modernzing Instruction, Bosten : All and Bacon .Inc.,(1973) P.112
Collette, A.T. & Chiapptta E.L.(1984):Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary Schools .S.T.Louis , Tornto Time Mirror , Masby College Publishing.
Hober,S.A."The PSSC Courese " Reading in Science Education for Secondary School .(New York:The Macamillan co.1967) P.418.
Harvard Project Physics: Resource Books (New York Holt Rinchart and winaton ,1975 P.111
Hinman,Richard.L(1999):Scientific Literacy Revisited Phidelta Kappan,V81,N3,NOV.
Jegede , O.J(1997):School Science and the Development of Scientific Culture: A Review of Contemporary Science Education in Africa. International Journal of Science Education,19,1.
Klopfer, L.S.(1968):Scientific Inquiry, Chicago , paper presented at (NASTA).
Maarschalk, J, "Scientific Literacy Through Informal Science Teaching" European Journal of Science Education, Vol.8,No 4.1986, pp.353-6-360.
Mitman, A.L. OTHERS(1987):Instruction Addressing the Component of Scientific Literacy and Relating to student outcomes American Educational Research journal ,winter,vol.24,No.4
O'Hearn, G.T.; Scientific Literacy and Alternative futures Science Education, Vol.60,No 1.1976, pp.103-114.
Rubb , P.A. & Anderson, H.O.(1978):"Development of an Instrument Assess secondary School students understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge , Science Education,vol.26,no,4,New York.
Reichard, D.E.(1985):Politics on Scientific Literacy, Science Education, vol 06,No.3.
-
Showalter, victor(1974):"What is Unified Science Education? Part 5,Program objectives and Scientific Loiteracy prism, center for unified science Education,Ohio.
Jennison , Brenda (1998): Atoll of Two Countries:Physics in Japan an English Perspective ,Physics Education,33 (6) November Pella,M.O.(1976):"The place or Function of science for Aliterate Citizenry, Science Education, Vol.60,No.1,pp.97-101.
.
-
E=MV2 mgh MV
-
111
Jawwal/
-
E=MV2 mgh MV
.
-
h}f^f^Hg%*^GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGS/^/o|%h}G
yA:
UZ}
111
Jawwal/
-
SYBJA/f crA Ii fJ U
-
4
-
408 52 1/5 2 2 2
-
2
2
2
2
-
kg kg
AmA ON
-
zG mA A B A UifA A
-
In order to answer the study questions and verification of the premises, the researcher used the descriptive-analytical method, and prepared a list of the dimensions of physical literacy. The researcher also prepared a test of physical literacy that has been judged by experts, and then applied the test on a pilot sample of (30) students from the scientific eleventh grade students to calculate the truth and consistency and the difficulty and discrimination for them. The study sample was selected to include (300) students, male and female students from scientific eleventh grade students from Shuhada'a Rafah Secondary School for boys and Al-Quds Secondary School for girls, and those students have been selected randomly and physical literacy test was applied on a sample survey at the end of the second semester of the academic year (2008 2009), and then test results were collected to confirm the validity of the hypotheses. Several statistical methods had been used to analyze the data, including percentages and frequencies, test (t) of the independent samples and the results were as follows:
1- the level of physical literacy to the scientific eleventh grade students is less than the limit required of the scale that is 75% of the total mark for the measurement for the physical literacy.
2- the study proved that there is no statistically significant differences between the level of physical literacy to the scientific eleventh grade students due to the factor of sex (male, female) with average of male students (20,526%), and the average grades of female students (20,781%), while the general average of the degrees of students equal to (20,65%).
The researcher has made several recommendations based on the results of the study, which may contribute to create physical literacy to the students.
-
Abstract of StudyThe current study aimed to identify the physical level of literacy to the scientific eleventh grade students. To achieve this, the problem of the study has been identified by asking the next main question:
What are the physical dimensions of literacy included in the platform for the content of physics for the scientific eleventh grade students? And how students acquire it?
The main question mentioned above has the following sub-questions: 1- What are the physical dimensions of literacy to be available in the platform for the content of physics for the scientific eleventh grade students? 2- How to ensure the content of physics for the scientific eleventh grade students of the physical dimensions of literacy?
To answer these questions, the hypotheses of the study have been formulated as follows:
- There is no statistically significant differences at the level of significance ( 0.05) between the level of physical literacy to the eleventh grade students and the level of proficiency 75%.
- There is no statistically significant differences at the level of significance ( 0.05) in the level of physical literacy to the eleventh grade students attributable to sex (male, female)?
-
Physical Dimensions of Literacy Included in
the Platform for the Content of Physics
for the Eleventh Grade Students
and Their Acquisition of it
Prepared by Jalal Abedrabbo Al-Sheikh Eid
Supervised by
Dr Salah Ahmed Al-Naqa
A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master in Curricula and Teaching Methods of
Science in the Faculty of Education at Islamic University in Gaza.
200/14
The Islamic University Gaza
Deanship of Postgraduate Studies
Faculty of Education
Curricula and Teaching Methods Section
top related