3. arbitrage pricing model - zentraler informatikdienst »...
Post on 27-Mar-2018
222 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
3. Arbitrage Pricing Model
Dr Youchang WuDr. Youchang WuWS 2007
Asset Management Youchang Wu 1
Single factor modelSingle factor modelA ti A t t l t d ONLYAssumptions: Asset returns are correlated ONLY because they all respond to one common risk factor, which is usually the market return.factor, which is usually the market return.
jiifCOVrr jijtmtjjjt ≠=++= 0),(, εεεβα
Macro events affect returns of all assetsMicro events affect only individual assetsMicro events affect only individual assetsAfter controlling for the common risk factor, there is no correlations between returns of different assets.It follows that )(),( 2
mjiji rrrCOV σββ=
Asset Management Youchang Wu 2
jj
Portfolio variancePortfolio varianceTotal variance = Systematic risk + idiosyncratic riskTotal variance = Systematic risk + idiosyncratic risk
+= rr jmjj )()()( 2222 εσσβσ
+=
∑∑
rrnn
pmpp
jmjj
)()()(
)()()(
2222
2222 εσσβσ
β
+∞→→
+=
∑
∑∑==
nasrw
wrw
n
ii
imii
i
)()(
)()()(
22
1
2222
1
σβ
εσσβ
Factor structure greatly simplies the calculation of portfolio variance
+∞→→ ∑=
nasrw mii
i )()(1
σβ
Factor structure greatly simplies the calculation of portfolio variance. This is the main motivation for Sharpe (1963) to introduce the factor model.
Asset Management Youchang Wu 3
Number of parametersNumber of parameters
To estimate the variance of a portfolio with N assets, originally we would need to estimate– N variances– N*(N-1)/2 covariances
With the factor structure, we only need to estimate– N idiosyncratic variances– N betas– 1 factor variance
Asset Management Youchang Wu 4
Multifactor modelsMultifactor models
Security returns are driven by multiple common risk factors
If th i k f tjtLtLjtjtjjjt FFFr εβββα +++++= ...2211
If the common risk factors are uncorrelated with each other, then
...)()()()()( 222
121
22
11
2n
iii
n
iiip FwFwr σβσβσ ∑∑
==
++=
)()()( 2
1
222
1
11
i
n
iiL
n
iLii
ii
wFw εσσβ ∑∑==
==
++
Asset Management Youchang Wu 5
11 ii
Multifactor model: exampleMultifactor model: exampleE l 2 f tExample: 2 factors
β β Residualβ1 β2 Residual variance
Security I 0.6 0.2 0.05Security II 0.9 0.1 0.02
Assume that σF1²=0.12 and σF2²=0.10 and
y
COV(F1, F2)=0. Compute the variance of the following portfolio wI=wII=0.5
Asset Management Youchang Wu 6
Constructing zero beta portfolioConstructing zero-beta portfolioE lExample:
Security β βSecurity β1 β2A -0.4 1.75B 1.6 -0.75C 0.667 -0.25C 0.667 0.25
How can you construct a zero-beta portfolio?
Asset Management Youchang Wu 7
Rewriting the factor modelsRewriting the factor modelsF i li it d fi f th t dFor simplicity, define fi as the unexpected component of Fi,
)(FEFfBy definition E(f )=0
)( iii FEFf −≡By definition, E(fi)=0Rewrite the factor models as
Asset return = expected return + response to
jtLtLjtjtjjjt fffrEr εβββ +++++= ...)( 2211
Asset return = expected return + response to unexpected factor realization + idiosyncratic return
Asset Management Youchang Wu 8
APTAPT
R (1976) d th t t tRoss (1976) argued that to prevent arbitrage, we must have
∑=
+=L
llljfj rrE
1
)( λβ
where λl is the risk premium of factor l, i.e., the expected excess return of an asset
l 1
the expected excess return of an asset with βl=1 and βi=0 for all i≠l.=>Expected returns increase linearly with the loadings on common risk factors
Asset Management Youchang Wu 9
A simple derivation of APTA simple derivation of APT
For simplicity, consider just the single factor model without idiosyncratic risk
The return of a portfolio with two assets isfrEr jjj β+= )(
The return of a portfolio with two assets is
If we set
fwwrEwrwErwwrr jijijip ])1([)]()1()([)1( ββ −++−+=−+=
)/( βββIf we set then this portfolio is risk free, therefore its
)/( jijw βββ −−=
expected return must be rf.Otherwise there will be arbitrage opportunity
Asset Management Youchang Wu 10
A simple derivation of APTA simple derivation of APTIt follows thatIt follows that
βββ
βββ
=++− fjj
ij rrErE )()1()(
ββ
ββββ
−=−⇒
−−
fijfji
jiji
EErrErrE
)()(])([])([
The derivation is similar for the case of multiple factors without
λββ
≡−
=−
⇒j
fj
i
fi rrErrE )()(
pidiosyncratic riskWhen they are idiosyncratic risk, APT hold only approximately.Key argument: If APT does not hold, then arbitrageurs can create a y g , gwell-diversified zero beta portfolios with an expected return different from the risk free rate.This would make arbitrage possible!
Asset Management Youchang Wu 11
Arbitrage in expectationsArbitrage in expectations
Asset Management Youchang Wu 12
Arbitrage in expectations (2)Arbitrage in expectations (2)
Asset Management Youchang Wu 13
APT ExampleAPT ExampleSecurity β β Expected returnSecurity β1 β2 Expected return
A 1.0 1.6 16.2B 3.0 2.8 21.6rf 0 0 0 0 10 0rf 0.0 0.0 10.0
Suppose APT holdspp
What is the risk premium for factor 1?
What is the risk premium for factor 2?p
Asset Management Youchang Wu 14
What are the risk factorsWhat are the risk factorsAPT d t if h t th f t t d fAPT does not specify what the factors stand forThe factor structure is ambiguous. If securities’ returns can be written using the k-factor vector f and the n x k beta matrix B, they
l b itt i f t t f* dcan also be written using a factor vector f* and a beta vector B* as long as
,*1* BLBandfLf == −
where L is a non-singular k × k matrix.
Asset Management Youchang Wu 15
Chen Roll and Ross (1986)Chen, Roll and Ross (1986)Ch R ll d R (1986 “E i fChen, Roll and Ross (1986, “Economic forces and the stock market”, Journal of Business) find the following macroeconomic factors arethe following macroeconomic factors are relevant– Unanticipated changes in industrial production– Unanticipated changes in industrial production– Unanticipated changes in inflation– Unanticipated changes in risk premiums (asUnanticipated changes in risk premiums (as
measured by the return difference between low grade and high grade bonds
– Unanticipated changes in the term structure of interest rates
Asset Management Youchang Wu 16
Why are those factors chosenWhy are those factors chosenStocks prices in a discounted cash flow frameworkStocks prices in a discounted cash flow framework
[ ]CEP =
– E[C] = expected dividends– r = discount rate
r
Relevant factors are those that influence either the discount rate or the expected dividends:
Discount rate:– Discount rate:• Change in risk premium• Changes in Term Structure
Dividends:– Dividends:• Changes in inflation rate• Changes in industrial production
Asset Management Youchang Wu 17
Construction of the factorsConstruction of the factors
Industrial production growth:( ) ( ) ( )1ll PIPIMP
Inflation:( ) ( ) ( )1lnln −−= tPItPItMP
– Unexpected inflation rate( ) ( ) ( )[ ]1= ttIEtItIU
– Changes in expected inflation rate
( ) ( ) ( )[ ]1−−= ttIEtItIU
g p( ) ( ) ][ ( ) ][ 11 −−+= ttIEttIEtIED
Asset Management Youchang Wu 18
Construction of the factors (2)Construction of the factors (2)Risk premium:
( ) ( )tBGLreturnbondunderandBaatUPR −= ""note that UPR(t) is negatively related to unexpected changes in aggregate risk aversion
( ) ( )tBGLreturnbondunderandBaatUPR =
changes in aggregate risk aversionTerm Structure:
( ) ( ) ( )1tBTtBGLtSTUAdditionally examined variables:
EWNY(t) t ll i ht d NYSE i d
( ) ( ) ( )1−−= tBTtBGLtSTU
– EWNY(t): return on equally weighted NYSE index– VWNY(t): return on value-weighted NYSE index
Asset Management Youchang Wu 19
Empirical ResultsEmpirical Results
Model equations:eSTURPUIUIEDPMaR UTSUPRUIDEIMP ++++++= βββββ
Results (see the table):εβββββα ++++++= UTSUTSUPRUPRUIUIDEIDEIMPMP bbbbbR
Results (see the table):• bMP > 0
b 0• bDEI < 0• bUI < 0• bUPR > 0• bUTS<0
Asset Management Youchang Wu 20
Results (Panel C of table 4)Results (Panel C of table 4)
Asset Management Youchang Wu 21
Results (Panel D of table 4)Results (Panel D of table 4)
Asset Management Youchang Wu 22
InterpretationInterpretation
bMP>0: stocks less sensitive to production risk are more valuable (therefore has a lower return)bUPR>0: stocks less sensitive to the return of low-grade bond returns (relative to that of high-grade g ( g gbonds) are more valuablebUI<0,bDEI<0: stocks doing well when inflation isbUI 0,bDEI 0: stocks doing well when inflation is unexpectedly high are more valuableb <0: stocks doing well when long-term realbUTS<0: stocks doing well when long-term real rate is unexpectedly low are more valuable.
Asset Management Youchang Wu 23
Further remarksFurther remarks
Market return as a factor:– The macroeconomic factors don’t lose their
significance, even if market return is included as a factor.
– The influence of market return is not significantsignificant
– CAPM would suggest the oppositeTh f th lt t APT i t– Therefore the results support APT against CAPM
Asset Management Youchang Wu 24
APT and portfolio managementAPT and portfolio management
S R ll R d S A R 1984 ThSee Roll, R. and S. A. Ross, 1984, The Arbitrage Pricing Theory Approach to Strategic Portfolio Planning, Financial Analyst Journal, p. 14-26.The central focus of portfolio strategy is the choices of an appropriate pattern of t e c o ces o a app op ate patte ofactor sensitivitiesThis choice should depend on theThis choice should depend on the economic characteristics of the investors
Asset Management Youchang Wu 25
ExampleExample
Two factors:inflation and industrial production.Is zero exposure to both factors desirable?– No hedge against
inflationinflation– No risk premium
Asset Management Youchang Wu 26
Analyzing portfolio strategiesAnalyzing portfolio strategies
Analysis of the investors’ economic situation – What is the investor’s expenditure structure?
What is the investor’s income structure?– What is the investor s income structure?– E.g. Institutional investors: Expenditures are
l i fl d b f d i b t th iless influenced by food prices; but their travelling expenses are likely to be higher th th f i tthan those of an average investor.
Compare with the market portfolioAsset Management Youchang Wu 27
p p
Strategic portfolio decisionsStrategic portfolio decisions
If an institution does not need to hedge so much against inflation due to low sensitivity to food price ⇒ choose a low βI (relative to the average).βI ( g )If an institution does not need to hedge so much against production fluctuationsagainst production fluctuations⇒ choose a high βIP.By bearing such additional systematic risks theBy bearing such additional systematic risks the institution can earn a higher expected return
Asset Management Youchang Wu 28
Tactical portfolio decisionsTactical portfolio decisions
If the firm’s idiosyncratic risk depends on energy cost => heavily invest in the stocks of energy sector.If the firm is unconcerned about inflation inIf the firm is unconcerned about inflation in agricultural price=> skew portfolio holdings out of this sector=> skew portfolio holdings out of this sectorCommon mistake: pension funds investing in the stock of the sponsoring firmstock of the sponsoring firm
Asset Management Youchang Wu 29
APT and CAPMAPT and CAPMAPT ll f lti l i k f t b t iAPT allows for multiple risk factors but requires zero correlation among idiosyncratic returnsCAPM considers only one factor but does not requiredCAPM considers only one factor but does not required zero correlation among idiosyncratic returnsCAPM is derived under the assumption that investors phold mean-variance efficient portfolios, while APT is derived under the assumption of no arbitraged in expectationsexpectationsCAPM recommends investors to hold the market portfolio, while APT suggests investors to optimize p gg pexpoures to risk factors acording to their own profiles.
Asset Management Youchang Wu 30
top related