a.litvinenko vblhep jinr Определение центральности столкновения...

Post on 19-Dec-2015

254 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

Определение центральности столкновения ядер с использованием калориметра cпектаторов

в эксперименте MPD@NICA

A.Litvinenko, litvin@moonhe.jinr.ru

M.Golubeva, F.Guber, A.Ivashkin, A.Kurepin,INR, Moscow

A.Litvinenko, E.Litvinenko, A.Isupov, I.Migulina, V.Peresedov, JINR, Dubna

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

IntroductionSome definitionsSpectators

UrQMD generatorUrQMD generator LAQGSM generatorLAQGSM generator UrQMD - SHIELD - LAQGSMUrQMD - SHIELD - LAQGSM ConclusionsConclusions

OutlineOutline

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

NICA

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

MPD

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

Quasi-Classical pictureb – not observable observables b

Nuclear-Nuclear collisions

6

R

geo Rbdb2

0

2)2(2

Centrality classification

Value of impact parameter

Geometrical cross section

8%)(2 fm 42 b

In percent from the geometrical cross section

% 50 40Centrality

Corresponds to the region impact parameter

fm 9.5 (15)fm 0.63 )2( 4.0min Rb

fm 10.6 (15)fm 0.71 )2( 5.0max Rb

%) ( 2R

b

2R

b

(b

(b2

A

max

2

A

min

geo

max

geo

min

σσ

σσ ))

;)b(bdb)b(b

0

22 ππσ

Centrality classification

1. (fm) b bb maxmin

2. Fraction from total cross-section

%) ( 2Rb

2Rb

2

A

max

2

A

min

3. Number of participant

…. ?

.partN

Impact parameter

%) ( 2Rb

2Rb

2

A

max

2

A

min

8

Centrality classification

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

The importance of the centrality classification

elliptic flow scaling with space eccentricity short equlibration time

Space eccentricityElliptic flow

...)2cosv2cosv21(2

121

ddN

ε=A 2

2

v

Nuclear Physics A V757, No. 1-2 , p.184,2005

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

The importance of the centrality study

Jet Quenching – nuclear modification factor vs centrality

Nuclear Physics A V757, No. 1-2 , p.184,2005

Nuclear modification factor

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

The importance of the centrality study

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

Nucleon spectators (spectrum)

Yu.Bayukov et al ., YaF V.35, No. 4, p.960, (1982)

R.Ammarи et al., Pisma v JETF, V.94, No. 4, p.189, (1989)

nXPb

pXEm ~

nXC

X )p(backward Em

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

Spectator spectrum

)exp(-T/TC pd

dE 03

МэВ 10 - 5 T0

)Tmm-PP

exp(-C pd

dE

0N

2NFS

3

Θ•)

σ

)pp(•=

pd

σdE

Θp2

2

2

2b

3 2exp(-

2

-exp(-C

0.022 - 0.016 p

Tm GeV/c; 0.22 - 0.15

mTE

2b

0N

N

0bp

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

Front view of ZDC. The squares size is 5 x 5 cm x cm

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

ZDC@MPD geometrical efficiency

.)tot(N/)ZDC(N )ZDC( SS

central hole

out of ZDC

0.99 >)ZDC(ε

% 70 50 )d)

2exp(-

)d)2

exp(-

)ZDC(

0 2

2

r 2

2

ZDCint/L

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

Simulation Transport – Geant3 and Geant4, generates UrQMD and LAQGSM

framework MpdRoot

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

URQMD generator, Sqrt(S)=5 GeV

Total kinetic energy of all nucleonsdirected to ZDC

Optimistic results with UrQMD

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

UrQMD generator, Sqrt(S)=9 GeV

Total kinetic energy of all nucleonsdirected to ZDC

Optimistic results with UrQMD

0.782m- N

=A)S(

EΔ=ε

NN

ZDC

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

The accuracy of impact parameterdetermination for MC with UrQMD

% 18 E GeV 20 E GeV 114 E(b)

b fm 0.35 b ; fm 0

=δ;=Δ;=

=δ;=Δ=b

% 10 E GeV 38 E GeV 392 E(b)

% 13 b fm 0.67 b ; fm 5

=δ;=Δ;=

=δ;=Δ=b

C - N(b)

N(b) b

A

1 b ;

A

C-

N(b)1/ E NT E T E(b)

N(b)1/ N N N C;

bb

=δ;)b(N=Δ)b(N

=b

=δ;•=Δ);b(N•=

=δ;=Δ+b•A=)b(N

% 7 E GeV 49 E GeV 673 E(b)

% 9 b fm 0.87 b ; fm 10

=δ;=Δ;=

=δ;=Δ=b

% 150 <<β;E

β=

E

22

The centrality resolution evaluations √S=9 AGeVThe centrality resolution evaluations √S=9 AGeV

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

But

The NA49 collaboration. Eur. Phys. J., A2, 383, (1998)

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

LAQGSM high-energy event generatorLAQGSM high-energy event generator

But

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

LAQGSM generator, Sqrt(S)=5 GeV

Total kinetic energy of all nucleonsand fragments directed to ZDC

Taking into account spectator fragments

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

LAQGSM generator, Sqrt(S)=9 GeV

Total kinetic energy of all nucleonsand fragments directed to ZDC

Taking into account spectator fragments

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

SHIELD event generator

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

LAQGSM, Sqrt(S)=5 GeV

Total kinetic energy of all nucleonsand fragments directed to ZDC

URQMD, Sqrt(S)=5 GeV

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

At large impact parameters the most of spectator nucleons are bound in fragments.

The NA49 collaboration. Eur. Phys. J., A2, 383, (1998)

Experimental data : the deposited energy for different types of spectators in dependence of

the centrality

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

All nucleons directed to the hole of ZDC (rectangle 10x10cm2)

0 % - 60 % 60 % - 80 % 80 % - 100 %

mrad 100.3 -3 30.=rad•~θ

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

At large impact parameters the most of spectator nucleons are bound in fragments.

The NA49 collaboration. Eur. Phys. J., A2, 383, (1998)

Experimental data : the deposited energy for different types of spectators in dependence of

the centrality

33

The centrality resolution evaluations The centrality resolution evaluations √S=9 AGeV√S=9 AGeV

Kinetic energy of all spectators directed to solid angle 5º

The centrality resolution evaluations √S=9 AGeVThe centrality resolution evaluations √S=9 AGeV

The centrality resolution evaluations √S=9 AGeVThe centrality resolution evaluations √S=9 AGeV

The centrality resolution evaluations √S=9 AGeVThe centrality resolution evaluations √S=9 AGeV

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

The centrality determination: ZDC (energy) + number of charged barrel

tracks

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

UrQMD - SHIELD - LAQGSM

b < 3 фм (0 – 4 %)

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

UrQMD - SHIELD - LAQGSM

3 фм < b < 9.5 фм (4 – 40 %)

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

UrQMD - SHIELD - LAQGSM

9.5 фм < b (40 – 100 %)

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

Centrality determination in some experiment

y=0 y=3y>6

STARPHENIXNA49

NA49 ZDC Only

STAR TPC only

PHENIX BBC & ZDC

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

Conclusions

• The SHIELD and LAQGSM could be used for NICA/MPD simulations under mpdroot.

• The SHIELD and LAQGSM angular distributions of the spectators differ from URQMD picture.

• The experimental study of the spectator distributions and calorimeter resolution have to be performed on the extracted beam of NUCLOTRON-M at the fixed target.

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

Conclusions

•Работа выполнена при поддержке грантов РФФИ

10-02-01036-а

11-02-01026-а

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

Backup slidesBackup slides

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

Fast evaluations: the movement of spectators at NICA/MPD

bpXY

Z

T 1 B

QB0.3Ap

- Ap

zQB0.3cos

QB0.3Ap

)z(y

ApzQB0.3

sinQB0.3Ap

)z(x

T

z

T

z

T

ApzQB0.3

cos12QB0.3Ap

yx )z,B(z

T22

Ap

zQBz

p

pzB

Ap

zQB

zz

T

z

0.3

2

1 ; ),( 0.2

0.3

The conclusion:Magnetic field of MPD will not change the polar angles for spectators at ZDC position it will only slightly changes the azimutal angles

06 zT p/p

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

Centrality classification

C.E.Aguilar et al., Brazilian Journal of Physics, V.34,No.1,p.319,(2004)

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

Calorimeter No.1

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

Calorimeter No.1

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

Calorimeter No.1

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

Calorimeter No.1

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

Linearity

Resolution

Longitudinal distribution

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

Calorimeter No.1

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

CONCLUSION

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

Пространственное разрешение

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

)c/GeV(Pz )c/GeV(Pz

)c/GeV(Pz)c/GeV(Pz

partN

)c/GeV(Px

)GeV(EZDC

partN

partN

ZDC

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

ZDC + Multiplicity

1000 Min Bias

chN

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

ZDC + Multiplicity

1000 Min Bias

chN

chN chN

chN

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

PHENIX

ZDC + BBC

A.Litvinenko VBLHEP JINR

NA49

VCAL (ZDC)

65

TIME = 0 fm/c, 0.7

66

TIME = 1 fm/c, 0.6

67

TIME = 2 fm/c, 0.5

68

TIME = 3 fm/c, 0.3

top related