impact parameters resolutions in √s=13 tev pp interactions...

Post on 02-Jun-2020

2 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Impact parameters resolutions in √s=13 TeV pp interactions measured with

ATLAS at the LHC

● Student: Zuzana Reščáková

● Project supervisor: Yuri A. Kulchitsky

● Project supervisor: Yuri A. Kulchitsky Yuri A. Kulchitsky

● The Laboratory of Nuclear problems

● Student: Zuzana ReščákováZuzana Reščáková

Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, SlovakiaNuclear and Subnuclear Physics

ATLAS detector● is a particle physics experiment for pp, pA and AA collisions

investigated for energies 0.9 - 14 TeV at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN

● covers almost the whole solid angle around the collision point with layers of tracking detectors, calorimeters and muon chambers

● for our measurements the tracking devices and the trigger system are of particular importance

ATLAS detector ATLAS trigger detector

Introduction

● Measurements of inclusive charged-particle distributions in pp collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV provides insights into soft-QCD processes.

● The distributions are corrected for detector effects and are presented as inclusive-inelastic distributions, in a well-defined fiducial region.

● These distributions are compared to particle level Monte Carlo (MC) predictions.

Motivation

● The motivation of these study are analysis of transverse, , and longitudinal, , Impact Parameters (IP) distributions within the Inner Detector for Selected, Primaries and Secondary (electrons and non-electrons) tracks with the aim of characterizing the resolution, alignment and material budget in dependent from η, and .

● The comparison of Monte-Carlo predictions for IP distributions with Experimental results are good source of information for verification of ATLAS Geo Model for Inner Detector.

● Impact parameters are one of the most important criterion for reconstructed track selection.

d 0z0 (sinΘ)

pT nsel

Impact parameters and z0 (sinΘ)d 0

d 0

z0 (sinΘ)

-the signed distance to the z-axis

-the z-coordinate of the track at the point of closest approach to the global z-axis

Track distribution for parameterd 0

Run 2 for pp at 13 TeV Run 1 for pp 0.9 – 8 TeV

Convolution of Gaussian with Gaussian for and

 

● The beam spot resolution for

● The beam spot resolution for

● The beam spot resolution for

● C – normalization parameter

● and - resolution and average of the IP

● and - resolution and average for beam spot

σ (d0)

σBS (d 0)=σ BS

σ (z 0 sinΘ )

σBS ( z0)=σ BS cotgΘ

σBS ( z0 sinΘ )=σBS cosΘσBS

σ IP

μBS

μ IP

Resolution in depence from η for at 13 TeV Reprocessing. Average of IP d0 Deconvolution. Resolution of IP d0

d 0

Resolution in depence from for at 13 TeV pT

Reprocessing. Average of IP d0 Deconvolution. Resolution of IP d0

d 0

Charged-particle multiplicities at √s=13 TeV● Results of our investigation for impact parameters are included in

these distributions.● Absolutly new energy

Conclusion

● Impact parameters resolution are very important for correct track selection.

● IP resolution is twice better for Run2 than for Run1 geometry. It means that background from secondary tracks are smaller.

● The IP d0 and z0 sinΘ resolutions for experimental data are in good agreement with MC prediction.

● The IP d0 and z0 sinΘ averages for experimental data are in good agreement with MC predictions.

Thank you for your attentionThank you for your attention

BACKUP SLIDES

Selection of tracks

Cut parameter Cut value

pT|η|

Number of Silicon hitsNumber of Pixel hits

Number of b-layer hitsNumber of tracks in PV

Number of PVsNumber tracks in PV

Track Probability for pT>10 GeV

> 0.5 GeV/c< 2.5≥ 6≥ 1> 0> 1= 1≥ 2≥0.01

Selection cuts at 13 TeV Select only well-defined tracks, Select a primary vertex to reduce error in IP.

Track distribution for parameterz0 (sinΘ)

Run 2 Run 1

Resolution in depence from for nsel

Reprocessing. Average of IP d0 Deconvolution. Resolution of IP d0

d 0

Resolution in depence from η for Reprocessing. Average of IP z0sinΘ Deconvolution. Resolution of IP z0sinΘ

z0 (sinΘ)

Resolution in depence from for pTReprocessing. Average of IP z0sinΘ Deconvolution. Resolution of IP z0sinΘ

z0 (sinΘ)

Resolution in depence from for nselReprocessing. Average of IP z0sinΘ Deconvolution. Resolution of IP z0sinΘ

z0 (sinΘ)

top related