parton production in nn and aa collision 신기량 안동대학교 물리학과 sept. 3, 2005 apctp
Post on 27-Dec-2015
217 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Parton Production in nn and AA collisiParton Production in nn and AA collisionon
신기량안동대학교 물리학과
Sept. 3, 2005 APCTP
0. Introduction
• QM05:– We have a parton system which is not just a bunch o
f partons but has collective effects: flow, jet suppression and very dense.
– Which means that the classical parton cascade may have only very limited application! -> quantum Boltzmann or PC+Hydro
– Before we move on, we need to understand very carefully the partonic system: ‘How many parton’, ‘How are they evolving’, ‘How are they breaking up’, ‘How are the particles formed’
1. Particle production
• Depends on the colliding particles:– ep– nn– AA
• Depends on the available energy:– KeV– MeV– GeV– TeV
CROSS SECTION:CROSS SECTION:
1) Physical meaning:
a.
b.
2) Fermi Golden Rule:
( , ) ( , )sin
d b dbd D d D
d d
1d dNdN Ld
d L d
1 2 3 4 ... n
3 3322 3 4
2 2 22 2 23 41 2 1 2
4 41 2 3
...(2 ) 2 (2 ) 2 (2 ) 24 ( ) ( )
(2 ) ( ... )
n
n
n
cd p cd pcd pSd M
E E Enp p m m c
p p p p
3. ep Collisions
Depending on energy:– Movie at KeV:– Movie at MeV:– Movie at GeV:– Movie at TeV:
• ep at KeV: see only electric field: Rutherford scattering, Mott formula
• ep at MeV: Rosenbluth formula(Elastic scattering)
2
22 22 2
) ( ) cos22 sin ( / 2)
mott
dmc p
d p
����������������������������
22
2 2)
2 sin ( / 2)Rutherford
d e
d mv
22
42
,4
21 3 3 1 1 3
3 521 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 2
'
8
2 ( ) ( )
( )( ) ( ) ( )
eelectron proton
electron
proton
d EM
d McE
gM L K
q
L p p p p g mc p p
K KKK K g p p q q p q p q
Mc Mc Mc
Thus,2
2 21 22
') 2 sin ( / 2) cos ( / 2)
24 sin ( / 2)Rosenbluth
d EK K
d ME E
• ep at GeV: Inelastic collisions2
2
2
42
,4
52 41 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 2
'
'
( )( ) ( ) ( )
eelectron proton
proton
d EM
dE d cq E
gM L W
q
WW WW W g p p q q p q p q
Mc Mc Mc
2
2 2 2 21 22
2 ( , )sin ( / 2) ( , ) cos ( / 2)' 2 sin ( / 2)
dW q x W q x
dE d E
2
...2
qwhere x
q p
<Bjorken function>
<Callan & Gross relation>
21 1
22
2 22
( , ) ( ),
( , ) ( )2
MW q x F x
qW q x F x
Mc x
1 22 ( ) ( )xF x F x
• ep at TeV:Hard particles: More than 80%, comming from elasti
c collision between e-partons.Soft particles: relatively small number.-> the parton distribution of nucleon is very importa
nt.
At RHIC energy, about half of them are hard particles and the other half soft particles.
4. nn, AA scattering
• pp scattering at MeV:– Mostly elastic collision
• pp scattering at GeV:– Inelastic collision with lots of soft particles
• pp scattering at TeV:– Elastic collisions among partons with minijets
Models
• Schwinger mechanism:• Inside-Outside cascade:
• Classical String Model:• Dual Parton Model:
• Parton-Parton elastic scattering (factorization):• CGC shattering(Yang-Mills equation):
Toy models
• Schwinger mechanism:-two infinite plates with charges(condensers):-constant electric field between them-vacuum persistance probability: P_V-particle production=1-P_V
Assume the constant color electric field(flux) between q and q_bar.If field energy > threshold energy, (qq_bar) pair produced.->Production rate: quark field equation in the potential -> Klein-Gordon eq
uation -> Scheodinger equation to identify the effective potential -> sea quark tunnels the potential to leave antiquark -> WKB approximation gives the tunneling rate.
• String model(Lund model):– Meson: q-q_bar connected with string in yo-yo state.– Suppose a string connected to quark and antiquark separating eac
h other
• See Figure• Quark-antiquark born at V_i• V_i = (x,t)-> (t+x,t-x) =• Verticies are on the proper time: At high energy, the produced particle
s are independent of rapidity• The probability element: for example, 2 vertices production
– V_0: – V_1: Where
( , ), ,y y rapidity
0 0 0 0 0( , )dP y d dy 2 2 2
1 01 01 01 01( , ( )dP f z M g M dz dM
0 1 0( ) / ,z p p p 201 0 1 1 0( )( )M p p p p
figure1
- The solution:
- FRITOF etc
2 2 201 01( ) ( )g M c M m
2 /2 (1 )( , )
abm zz
f z m N ez
( ) a bC e
• Dual Resonance Model:– Consider H-H collision at high energy. The exchange of a particle
of mass M, spin J:
– Sum of J: Veneziano scattering amplitude
– For fixed t, expand in s. Each term corresponds to a t-channel Feynman diagram with exchange of a particle:
• Regge trajectory -> Reggeon– Same for s-channel:
JA s
2
'0
( ( )) ( ( ))( , )
( ( ) ( ))
... ( ) .
s tA s t g
s t
where x x
' 20 JJ M
• figure2
Symmetrize over possible channels:
• Basic properties of HH collisions at high energy:– Inelastic processes with no quantum number flow=dominant– Forward scattering amplitude ~ purely imaginary– Total cross section ~ constant.
• Out of Regge trajectory, satisfies these.– => Pomeranchuk trajectory: Pomeron
4
( ) ' ( )2 ( )
( , ) ( , ) ( , )
(1 ) ( )
(1 ( )) sin( ( ))
i t tt
A A s t A t u A u s
e sg e
t t
0 1
Elastic scattering between partons:
• Simple and Clear!• Inclusive gluon production:
where
Pros: Pretty good with minijetsCons: no soft particles
2 2 2 2 21 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 22 2 2
16 1( ) ( , ) ( , ) ( )
1c
s tt c t
NdF x k F x k k k p d k d k
dyd p N p
������������������������������������������
1/ 2
2 2 2 21 2
exp( )
max( , , )
t
t
px y
s
k k p
• Minijets:
2 22 1 / 1 2 / 2
2( ) ( , ) ( , ) ( , , )
jett
ij kli A t j B tijklt
pdNKT b dy x f x p x f x p s t u
dydp s
• Unintegrated gluon distribution:– BFKL: solution of BFKL equation
– Kimber-Martin-Ryskin: DGLAP evolution
1/ 2 22 2 22 0
2 ''''0
''
0
ln ( / )( , ) exp ,
2 ln(1/ )2 ln(1/ )
4 ln 2, 28 (3), 3 / , (3) 1.202,
1.19, 0.15
t tt
s s s s
k k qCf x k
x q r xx
where
C r
2 2
2 22
212 2 2 2 2
''
( , ) ( , ) ,
( )( , , ) ( , ) ( ) '( , )
2
Q k
sa a aax
a
F x k xg x QQ
k x xf x k T k P z a k dz
z z
– Kharzeev-Levin: based on CGC
– GRV98: we have the code!
2 20
2 22 2
0 2
22 2 0
0
.......... ..( , )
... ..
( ) 1( ) , 170
s
ss
s
f if k QF x k Q
f if k Qk
where
xQ x GeV f mb
x
- CGC distribution: Triantafyllopoulos
2
2
2 2
2 2
2 2
02 2
1ln .......................... .
1( , ) ln ........ .
4 ln .......
st s
s t
s tt t
s t s
s ts t s
t s
Qif k Q
k
Q kk y if k Q
k Q
Q kI y k Q
k Q
• GRV98 & EKS98+minijets:
P_T distribution rapidity distribution
• DGLAP evolution:(DGLAP evolution:(Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov-Altarelli-Parisi)Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov-Altarelli-Parisi)
• Modified DGLAP:Modified DGLAP:
221 2 2
2,
( )( , )( , ( )) ( , ),
ln 2
: , ..ker ,
& : ..
sab sx
b q g
ab
a x xdzP z b
z
where
P b ac branching nal
a b parton distrstribution
221 12 2 2
2 0,
( )( , )[ ( , ( )) ( , ) ( , ) ( )]
ln 2s
ab s baxb q g
a x xdzP z b a x d P
z
• BFKL equation:(BFKL equation:(Balitsky-Fadin-Kuraev-Lipatov)Balitsky-Fadin-Kuraev-Lipatov)
Where
2 '2 2 222
2 '4 4 1/ 2'2 20
( , ) ( , ) ( , ) ( , )
ln(1/ ) (4 )g t g t g t g tA s t
tt t tt t
f x k f x k f x k f x kC dkk
x k k kk k
2 22 2
20( , ) ( , )t
a tt
dka x f x k
k
Yang-Mills Equation:
• Yang-Mills equation of motion: • Krasnitz, Nara and Venugopalan; Lappi
• Solve the equation and identify the number density:
,
1 2
,
( ) ( )
a aD F J
where
J x x
12 2
12
4 42
1 2
exp( / ) 1 ..( / 1.5)1
log(4 / ) ............( / 1.5)
0.137, 0.0087,
0.0358 , 0.465
glue t eff t s
s t s t t s
s eff s
a k m T kf
g a k k k
where
a a
m T
• KNV:
energy distribution
Number distribution rapidity distribution
• Pros and cons:– Good: based on the first principle(QCD)– Bad: infinite flat plates, only gluons,
no information on space
5. Summary
• Needs lots more work on particle production.• Of cause the work is one of great problems to
challenge.
• Need a new method to solve physics problems? I.e. we have a finite proton-proton cross section but we cannot calculate that in current formalism.
top related