pert – evn-nren –amsterdam 28/1/05 – toby rodwell (toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk) the pert and...

Post on 18-Dec-2015

218 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

PERT – EVN-NREN –Amsterdam 28/1/05 – Toby Rodwell (toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk)

The PERT and Network Performance Monitoring

EVN-NREN,Amsterdam 28//01/05

Toby Rodwell, Network Engineer

DANTE

PERT – EVN-NREN –Amsterdam 28/1/05 – Toby Rodwell (toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk)

Network Performance Problems

• Historically, long distance circuits (the “wide-area”) have been the bottleneck in a network

• In recent years, the capacity of long distance circuits has significantly increased

• End-to-end performance bottle-necks may now occur at any point in a system – end-system (application, OS, hardware), LAN or WAN

• As such, it is becoming more and more difficult for a non-expert end-user to diagnose their network performance issues

PERT – EVN-NREN –Amsterdam 28/1/05 – Toby Rodwell (toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk)

Origins of the PERT

• Conception of the PERT … Jan 01 Internet2 Meeting– Performance Enhancement and Response Team– To provide a support structure to investigate and resolve

problems in the performance of applications over computer networks

– Comparable to CERT structure

• Realization of the PERT … Dec 2002 TERENA meeting– GARR, TERENA, DANTE, SWITCH, CESnet, HEAnet and

UKERNA committed to a practical trial of a basic PERT

PERT – EVN-NREN –Amsterdam 28/1/05 – Toby Rodwell (toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk)

The GEANT PERT

• PERT 2002-2004– Informal, unregulated access to PERT; anybody can

request PERT’s help– PERT communicated via e-mail list– Primary purpose of investigation was to improve PERT’s

knowledge and experience– Problems were addressed on a best efforts basis– No dedicated Monitoring tools– RoundUp tracking system (off-the-shelf) used

PERT – EVN-NREN –Amsterdam 28/1/05 – Toby Rodwell (toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk)

GEANT2 PERT

• A development of the existing PERT• Pilot phase Nov 04 –Feb 05• Fully operational from Mar 05

• A virtual team consisting of – Case Managers, who receive new requests and manage unresolved

issues– Subject specialists who can be called upon to help resolve complex issues

• Monitoring tools – During the course of the GEANT2 project a monitoring infrastructure will

be developed and deployed which should be of particular help with performance troubleshooting

PERT – EVN-NREN –Amsterdam 28/1/05 – Toby Rodwell (toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk)

PERT Staff

• Case Managers– Part-time staff provided by GEANT2 project participants– On a roster to ensure continuous cover during normal working hours

(once PERT fully operational) – Cross-discipline experts who are capable of identifying the locations of

performance bottle-necks

• Subject Matter Experts – Unfunded volunteers from a potentially wide variety of organizations who

provide help on a best efforts basis– Have specialist knowledge in one or more subjects and so can precisely

diagnose the cause of a given problem and help the end-users resolve it

PERT – EVN-NREN –Amsterdam 28/1/05 – Toby Rodwell (toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk)

Pilot PERT Systems

• Issue Tracker– Record of PERT issues (cases) and their investigation– Use open-source, “Roundup” software– Publicly accessible at http://roundup.geant2.net:8080/pert

(eVLBI performance case issue4)

• PERT Diary– For assessing the performance of the PERT and highlighting

issues– Uses TWiki open-source software (user editable website)– Publicly accessible at

http://cemp1.switch.ch/cgi-bin/twiki/view/PERTDiary/WebHome

PERT – EVN-NREN –Amsterdam 28/1/05 – Toby Rodwell (toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk)

PERT Systems

• PERT Ticket System– Similar to Trouble Ticket systems used by NOCs– Optimised for the collaborative nature of PERT investigations

(will collect and records e-mails and Instant Messaging threads)– May directly contact SMEs who have expressed interest in a

particular subject

• Knowledge Base– Known performance issues, with possible ways to address them– Successful diagnostic strategies

PERT – EVN-NREN –Amsterdam 28/1/05 – Toby Rodwell (toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk)

Lessons Learned to Date

• Identify technical contact at each end• Determine the scope of testing possible

– If production machines involved, some configurations changes may not be acceptable for testing purposes

• Wherever possible, use methods to minimise the amount of variables – e.g. sink data to /dev/null, memory to memory transfer not

to disk

Nicolas
Explanation?

PERT – EVN-NREN –Amsterdam 28/1/05 – Toby Rodwell (toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk)

Contacting the PERT

• Normally via NREN• Selected pan-European projects (including EVN)

may contact PERT directly – Because the PERT is not 24x7 quick response, suspected

network failures are best reported to NREN/GEANT NOCs

• E-mail address – pert-report@geant2.net

Nicolas
Explanation?

PERT – EVN-NREN –Amsterdam 28/1/05 – Toby Rodwell (toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk)

GEANT Network Monitoring

PERT – EVN-NREN –Amsterdam 28/1/05 – Toby Rodwell (toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk)

Monitoring Tools• GEANT status monitoring

– 5 minute polling - state of equipment, circuits and services – Failed hardware or circuits detected within 10 minutes and action taken

by GEANT NOC, 24x7 • GEANT traffic statistics collection

– 5 minute polling of router interface counters (default and customised)– Collected data stored in a Round Robin Database (RRD), that is kept a

constant size by aggregating data as it ages• GEANT traffic statistics display

– For quick, real-time view – Weathermap– For back history and specialist counters – Taksometro

http://stats.geant.net/

PERT – EVN-NREN –Amsterdam 28/1/05 – Toby Rodwell (toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk)

Monitoring Tools - Taksometro

PERT – EVN-NREN –Amsterdam 28/1/05 – Toby Rodwell (toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk)

Monitoring Tools Taksometro

PERT – EVN-NREN –Amsterdam 28/1/05 – Toby Rodwell (toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk)

Monitoring Tools Taksometro

PERT – EVN-NREN –Amsterdam 28/1/05 – Toby Rodwell (toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk)

Monitoring Tools ‘Weathermap’ Kairos

PERT – EVN-NREN –Amsterdam 28/1/05 – Toby Rodwell (toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk)

Monitoring Tools ‘Weathermap’ Kairos

Hyperlinked traffic chart

PERT – EVN-NREN –Amsterdam 28/1/05 – Toby Rodwell (toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk)

Monitoring Tools – Synagon

(GEANT Ops only)Before After

PERT – EVN-NREN –Amsterdam 28/1/05 – Toby Rodwell (toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk)

Any Questions?

Thank you.

toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk

Nicolas
ADD New URL of PERT

PERT – EVN-NREN –Amsterdam 28/1/05 – Toby Rodwell (toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk)

Example Case

• … from last year. • Project has since moved on, but sequence of

events is still instructive• EVN throughput test

– Test the download of 430MB file from the JIVE website in Dwingerloo to the University of Oxford

– Problems with the systems in Oxford, therefore test done between JIVE and a GÉANT workstation.

PERT – EVN-NREN –Amsterdam 28/1/05 – Toby Rodwell (toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk)

Example Case

• Initial transfer test: – Via http, using wget– Took 5 minutes to complete the 430Mbps transfer,

(approximately 10Mbps throughput)

• PERT case opened• Potential causes

– Ethernet interfaces not full duplex mode– Insufficiently large TCP buffers

PERT – EVN-NREN –Amsterdam 28/1/05 – Toby Rodwell (toby.rodwell@dante.org.uk)

Example Case– The TCP receive buffers max size on GEANT of reasonable

size– wget uses the default TCP buffer size. TCP default buffer

size increased on two receiver (ws4.uk: Linux -> 8MB, ws1.de: Unix -> 196kB)

Dramatic improvement: 40Mbps– Could not access the JIVE webserver to increase the Tx

buffer (critical production machine)– Access was granted to the JIVE FTP server, where the Tx

buffer was increased to 2MBImprovement: 90Mbps

Nicolas
Were the results the same on both linux and unix systems?
Nicolas
How do we know that the increase is due to the increase of the Tx buffer and not the use of FTP instead of http?

top related