scr asset g
Post on 14-Apr-2018
218 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
7/27/2019 SCR Asset G
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scr-asset-g 1/18
INTANGIBALE ASSSETS
CAN BE TREATED IN THE
SAME WAY AS FIXEDASSETS.
THEY ARE NEEDED FOR
OPERATION AND ARE
ACQUIRED WITH
ENTERPRISE FUNDS.
EXAMPLE:
PATENTS CAPITALIZED
& MAY BE
EXPENSED
OVER A
PERIOD OF
TIME
PROPRIETOR’S CAPITAL ORIGINAL
AMOUNT
INVESTED IN
ENTERPRISE
STOCK-COMMON/ AMOUNT
7/27/2019 SCR Asset G
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scr-asset-g 2/18
PREFERRED INVESTED BY
SHAREHOLDERS
COST OF PROTOTYPE
DEVELOPMENT &
STUDIES FOR IMPROVED
PRODUCTIO, EFFICIENCY
& PROCESS
DEVELOPMENT (COULD
ALSO BE EXPENSED)
RETAINED EARNINGS EARNINGS
RETAINED
AFTER
DISTRIBUTION
OF DIVIDENDS
ACCURED EXPENSES PORTION OF
SALARIES DUE
BUT NOT YET
PAID
ACCRUED TAXES PORTION OF
TAXES DUE
BUT NOT YET
PAID
7/27/2019 SCR Asset G
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scr-asset-g 3/18
SHORT-TERM LOANS LOANS TO BE
REPAID IN
LESS THAN
ONE YEAR
LONG-TERM LOAN
(current portion)
PORTION OF
LOAN TERM
DEBT DUE FOR
PAYMENT
WITHIN ONE
YEAR
RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT
(DEFERRED REVENUE EXPENDITURE)
GOODWILL GOODWILL VALUE
PATENTS, CPOYRIGHTS PRODUCTION RIGHT
PRE-OPERATING EXPENSES SALARIES, TRAINING &
OTHER EXPENSES PRIOR T
REGULAR OPERATIONS
7/27/2019 SCR Asset G
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scr-asset-g 4/18
BUSINESS LOSS OPERATING LOSS IN INTIA
YEARS
* NONPHYSICAL POOSESSIONS OF AN ENTERPRISE EXPECTED TO YIEL
BENEFITS OVER A PERIOD OF YEARS
PETTY CASH
MONEY IN BANK
RAW MATERAIL
SPARE PARTS & CONSUMABLES
WORK-IN-PROCESS FINISHED PRODUCT (UNSOLD)
GOODS & SERVICES SOLD BUT NOT YET PAID FOR
NOTES & DEPOSITS DRAWING INTEREST, ETC
INSURANCE PREMIUMS LICENSE FEES
RENT
7/27/2019 SCR Asset G
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scr-asset-g 5/18
INTEREST ACCRUED
BUT NOT DUE
Current Assets
Cash/ Bank Balance
Accounts Receivable
Inventories
Total Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Short-term Loans
Accounts Payable
Total Current Liabilities
Net Current Assets
Total Assets
Long-term Liabilities
Long-term Loan
Debenture
Deposits
7/27/2019 SCR Asset G
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scr-asset-g 6/18
EQUITY & LIABILITIES
Equity
Equity Share Capital
Preference Share Capital
Retained Earning
Total Equity
LIABILITIES
Equity
Capital Stock
Retained Earnings
Total Equity
Long-term Liabilities
Long-term Debt
Current Liabilities
Short-term Loans
Accounts Payable
Total Current Liabilities
7/27/2019 SCR Asset G
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scr-asset-g 7/18
TOTAL LIABILITIES & EQUIY
CONSISTENCY
ONCE A METHOD OR POLICY IS ADOPTED, SUBSEQUENT
TRANSACTIONS WILL BE TREATED IN THE SAME WAY;
OTHERWISE, CHANGES SHOULD BE EXPLAINED
8) COSERVATISM
TO AVOID OVERSTATEMENT, WHENEVER THERE IS
CHOICE IN VALUING ASSETS OR LIABILITIES THE MORE
CONSERVATIVE VALUE WILL BE USED
9) MATERIALITY
TRIVIALITIES ARE IGNORED. PERSONAL JUDGEMENT AND
COMMON SENSE DETERMINE WHETHER AN ITEM IS TRVIAL OR
NOT
The Going Concern Concept
ACCOUNTING IS BASED ON ASSUMPTION THAT THE
ENTERPRISE WILL OPERATE INDEFINITELY
7/27/2019 SCR Asset G
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scr-asset-g 8/18
4) The Cost Concept
FIXED ASSETS ARE ACCOUNTED FOR AT ACQUISITION COST
RATHER THAN VALUE THEY COULD BE SOLD FOR
5) The Dual Aspect Concept
EVERY (EVENT) TRANSACTION RECORDED AFFECTS AT LEAST
TWO ITEMS IN A FINANCIAL STATEMENT
6) The Accrual Concept
INCOME AND EXPENSES ARISING FROM TRANSACTIONS ARE
RECORDED IN THE PERIOD IN WHICH THEY OCCUR RATHER
THAN THE PERIOD IN WHICH PAYMENT IS MADE. SEEKS TO
MATCH COSTS WITH REVENUES
The raw material has to be cut to size. This is done with a variety of tools.
The most common way to cut material is by Shearing (metalworking);
Special band saws designed for cutting metal have hardened blades and a feed
mechanism for even cutting. Abrasive cut-off saws, also known as chop saws, are similar to
miter saws but with a steel cutting abrasive disk. Cutting torches can cut very large sections
of steel with little effort .
Burn tables are CNC cutting torches, usually natural gas powered. Plasma and laser
cutting tables, and Water jet cutters, are also common. Plate steel is loaded on a table and the
parts are cut out as programmed. The support table is made of a grid of bars that can be
7/27/2019 SCR Asset G
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scr-asset-g 9/18
replaced. Some very expensive burn tables also include CNC punch capability, with a
carousel of different punches and taps. Fabrication of structural steel by plasma and laser
cutting introduces robots to move the cutting head in three dimensions around the material to
be cut.
the maximum output rate a process can achieve under ideal conditions” (Krajewski and Ritzman,
2003). The company believes that the CSI effectively communicates how well a process meets
customer specifications, and it provides more useful feedback to the production system. For
instance, a 65% of CSI in cutter operation was measured over a two-month period, which indicates
that only 65% of peak capacity was utilized to meet customer needs. In other words, 35% of
machine capacity was either wasted (due to setup, wait for material, maintenance, or breakdown) or
produced items that failed to meet customer specifications. The 65% of CSI was then used as a
baseline to measure the level of improvement made by this project. The goal (performance
outcome) established for this process was 80 percent of CSI, which was considered to be thestandard for world-class practice.
Once the measure and process capability for cutting operations was defined, the project
team proceeded to analyze the root cause of poor CSI performance. A Pareto analysis was next
performed, and the team discovered that the cutter grinder accounted for 40% of machine
downtime on the cutting machines (Figure 3). The project team interviewed the operators and
found that, due to lack of proper lubrication of the blades, many cutting heads did not attain their
maximum life. Moreover, as the dull blades were removed for re-sharpening, cutter grindersbecame idle and thus failed to keep up with the production schedule. Apparently, the dullness of the
blades caused substantial downtime at the cutters. Furthermore, a dull blade also resulted in many
defect-prone items including rough finish along the cutter lines and machine crash. In summary, the
root cause of poor CSI was found to be blade inefficiency, since it caused machine downtime and
defective cutter bodies.
Specifically, neither traditional unit cost reduction nor local operations productivity increase
was used to determine the improvement effort. Instead, the impact of the improvement on overall
quality of axle and system throughput was used to select the improvement project.
Figure 2 displays a simplified process flow of the Axle manufacturing. Following the TOC
approach, the project team first searched for the bottleneck by identifying operations associated
with large piles of inventory. Gear cutting operation was suspected to be the bottleneck. The
project team further interviewed the operators of the downstream operation, lapping, and
confirmed that lapping was constantly starving for competed ring set from the cutting operation.
Accordingly, cutting operation was determined to be the bottleneck and was chosen as the target
for improvement. Incorporating TOC concept into improvement process enabled the project team
to select a project that could increase the plant throughput and bottom-line performance.
7/27/2019 SCR Asset G
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scr-asset-g 10/18
(take in Figure 2)
Value analysis was first performed to determine the various activities in the cutter operation
that add both customer and operational value to the process (Table 1). The purpose of value
analysis is to streamline the value chain to reduce all non-value added waste in the system and to
look for ways to enhance high value-added activities. The machine cycle that includes the cuttingoperation is both a customer and operational value-added activity. Improving the yield of a high-
value added activity such as blade cutting would increase the overall capacity of the plant.
Increasing the gear cutting capacity would have a positive impact on manufacturing system
throughput. This could be achieved through a reduction of hours required per gear set, which would
in turn increase the capacity and remove the need for new capacity investments.
(take in Table 1)
After confirming gear cutters as the bottleneck, the project team initially discussed purchasing
additional cutting capacity. The company was using a solvent-cutting device, where the cutting head
was lubricated to increase the shelf life of the cutting blades. Newer technology in this process had
advanced to dry cutting, a significant increase in the life of the blade, thereby increasing the
capacity. However, with the capital constraints facing the plant, it was not feasible to upgrade to the
dry cutting process. As suggested by the TOC concept, the team decided to “exploit” or maximize
the utilization of the current technology rather than make new capital investment in additional
cutting capacity. In other words, the team would proceed to investigate the current performance of
the solvent-based cutting machines and identifying ways to increase quality and throughput without
additional capital expenditures.
The business case for this project was initiated because of the eroding sales revenue, which
went down by 23% in 2000, while fixed expenses went up by as much as 22% within the same year.
Management was faced with either shutting down the plant or eliminating the non-value added
processes to increase capacity without incurring new capital expenditures. The Axle facility had
some experience in successfully applying Six Sigma to its process improvement. After receiving
training on TOC, managers decided to combine TOC and Six Sigma to guide their improvement
effort. They felt that the concept of TOC could provide them with a focus on global system
improvement. With careful study and planning, an eight-member project team was formed. The
project team was composed of the plant manager, the controller, two six-sigma certified employees,
and four operators from the plant. One of the authors of this paper and a student team served as
external resources for the project. The team was charged with the responsibility of seeking process
improvement that would result in a minimum of $175,000 savings per year. This was the minimum
standard established by the plant for any major process improvement project. The team started by
reviewing the process map to determine possible bottlenecks in the process. Extensive interviews
were conducted, and an in-depth observation of the processes was undertaken to identify probable
causes of inefficiencies in the system. After the extensive investigation, the cutting process was
singled out as the likely bottleneck operation. The proposed integrated framework was adopted tomake the improvement. The various stages of the process implementation are discussed below.
7/27/2019 SCR Asset G
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scr-asset-g 11/18
Phase 1 of this integrated framework is identical to both strategies, and its purpose is to
identify current constraint(s) that block the improvement of global performance, such as meeting
customer needs or improving system throughput. Accordingly, a specific process is selected for
improvement. Phases 2 and 3 follow the spirit of TOC by exploring the capacity of the selected
process. Phase 2 measures the current performance of the process and identifies the root causes
needed to be corrected for improvement. The two phases of Six Sigma, measure and analyze, are
involved in this step. Once the root causes are confirmed, Phase 3 of the integrated approach
applies conventional Six Sigma strategy by using the key manufacturing, engineering, and statistical
techniques to remove root causes of the problem for making necessary process improvement. The
purpose is to best utilize the current capacity of the process without incurring additional capital
expenditures.
Phase 4 ensures the changes made in previous steps are properly supported by the rest of the
system. For example, managers may need to change policies and obtain buy-in from employees to
implement the changes. Training is often required for a revised process. Phases 5 and 6 are taken
from the TOC process. If the improvement of the selected process is insufficient to satisfy customer
needs or goals, managers have to consider various options (e.g., outsourcing and additional
investment) to raise the capacity of the process. Finally, managers must stay alert to the dynamic
nature of the manufacturing system and constantly monitor occurrence of new constraints.
Overall, when the integrated framework is applied to improve a specific process, these two
techniques seem to complement each other. The integration is made by combining themanagement aspect of TOC and the engineering aspect of Six Sigma. Specifically, for firms that
apply Six Sigma, TOC provides a global perspective in identifying the constraints and examining
necessary changes to the rest of the systems. On the other hand, Six Sigma brings in the
perspectives of customer needs, performance measures, and engineering and statistical tools during
the stages Theory of Constraints (TOC) was developed by Eliyahu M. Goldratt during the 1980s
(McMullen, 1998). The core idea of TOC is that every organization has at least one constraint that
prevents management from achieving the goal of the organization to a larger degree. Constraints
can be physical resources or policies. TOC develops a set of procedures and methodologies to
identify and optimize such constraints. For the purpose of continuous improvement, TOC uses a
systematic approach which consists of five focusing steps (Goldratt and Cox, 1992).
1. Identify the system’s constraint(s).
2. Decide how to exploit the system’s constraint(s).
3. Subordinate everything else to the above decision.
4. Elevate the system’s constraint(s).
5. If a constraint has been broken, go back to Step 1. Do not allow inertia to cause asystem’s constraint.
7/27/2019 SCR Asset G
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scr-asset-g 12/18
The implementation of Six Sigma strategy involves a series of steps specifically designed to
facilitate a process of continuous improvement. The strategy takes the key manufacturing,engineering, and transactional processes of entire process through the five transformational phases
(Plotkin, 1999).
1. Define: Identify customer needs and a project suitable for Six-Sigma effort.
2. Measure: Determine what and how to measure the performance of the selected process.
3. Analyze: Understand and determine the variables that create quality variations.
4. Improve: Identify means to remove causes of defects and modify the process.
5. Control: Maintain the improvement.
The primary objective of the five-step process is to recognize critical customer requirements,
identify and validate the improvement opportunity, and upgrade the business processes. A
large number of companies have boosted their profitability, increased market share, and
improved customer satisfaction through the implementation of Six-Sigma. Companies such
as Allied Signal, General Electric, Sony, Texas Instruments, Bombadier, Crane Co.,
Lockheed Martin, and Caterpillar are beginning to dir
The swot anlysis of the Perpetual Inventory System is as under:
STREGTHS:
Accurate Reporti ng
Companies often experience more accurate financial reporting with a perpetualinventory system. Accountants update the general ledger after each inventorytransaction. This results in a general ledger account that closely mirrors the actual
physical inventory on hand. Owners and managers can then make quality decisions based on the accuracy of reporting inventory values. Multiple inventory types also benefit from this method, as accountants accurately track each one through thegeneral ledger.
7/27/2019 SCR Asset G
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scr-asset-g 13/18
Electronic Management
Perpetual inventory systems often use electronic methods to record transactions. Anexample is the barcode system a clothing retailer uses when selling goods. Each scanrecords data that updates the company's inventory value. Accountants use this
information to balance the general ledger. Companies also use the data to order goodsusing a just-in-time system. Electronic ordering helps to prevent stock outs and lostsales.
WEAKNESSES:
Cost
Many perpetual inventory systems are expensive. The cost for these systems istwofold. The technology necessary to make the system work can be a major capitalexpense. Updating the system for new changes to the technology is also costly.Training employees to properly use the system is yet another expense. On theadministrative side, companies must find accountants who can work the system andmanage frequent changes to the general ledger.
Process
Perpetual inventory systems are often time-consuming. Electronic updates to a
company's general ledger may result in a need for account reconciliations.Accountants will often spend copious hours each week or month to reconcileinventory. Persistent errors can also cause further complications. Accountants need tocorrect errors and balance the inventory account prior to closing the company's books.Reporting inaccurate inventory figures can trigger an audit, resulting in potential
problems for the company.
Additional record-keeping Increase workload, increase in staff. Additional costs Staff costs, costs of computer package to maintain inventory records.
First-In, First-Out (FIFO) is one of the methods commonly used to calculate the value of inventory on hand at the end of a period and the cost of goods sold during the period. This
method assumes that inventory purchased or manufactured first is sold first and newer
inventory remains unsold. Thus cost of older inventory is assigned to cost of goods sold and
that of newer inventory is assigned to ending inventory. The actual flow of inventory may not
exactly match the first-in, first-out pattern.
First-In, First-Out method can be applied in both the periodic inventory system and the
perpetual inventory system.
Example
7/27/2019 SCR Asset G
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scr-asset-g 14/18
Use the following information to calculate the value of inventory on hand on Mar 31 and cost
of goods sold during March in FIFO periodic inventory system and under FIFO perpetual
inventory system.
Mar 1 Beginning Inventory 60 units @ $15.00 per unit
5 Purchase 140 units @ $15.50 per unit
14 Sale 190 units @ $19.00 per unit
27 Purchase 70 units @ $16.00 per unit
29 Sale 30 units @ $19.50 per unit
Solution
FIFO Periodic
Units Available for Sale = 60 + 140 + 70 = 270
Units Sold = 190 + 30 = 220
Units in Ending Inventory = 270 − 220 = 50
Cost of Goods Sold Units Unit Cost Total
Sales From Mar 1 Inventory 60 $15.00 $900
Sales From Mar 5 Purchase 140 $15.50 $2,170
7/27/2019 SCR Asset G
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scr-asset-g 15/18
Sales From Mar 27 Purchase 20 $16.00 $320
220 $3390
Ending Inventory Units Unit Cost Total
Inventory From Mar 27 Purchase 50 $16.00 $800
FIFO Perpetual
Date
Purchases Sales Balance
Units Unit Cost Total Units Unit Cost Total Units Unit Cost Total
Mar 1 60 $15.00 $900
5 140 $15.50 $2,170 60 $15.00 $900
140 $15.50 $2,170
14 60 $15.00 $900 10 $15.50 $155
130 $15.50 $2,015
Under the perpetual inventory system, an entity continually updates its inventory records to
account for additions to and subtractions from inventory for such activities as received
inventory items, goods sold from stock, and items picked from inventory for use in the
production process. Thus, a perpetual inventory system has the advantages of both providing
7/27/2019 SCR Asset G
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scr-asset-g 16/18
up-to-date inventory balance information and requiring a reduced level of physical inventory
counts. However, the calculated inventory levels derived by a perpetual inventory system
may gradually diverge from actual inventory levels, due to unrecorded transactions or theft,
so you should periodically compare book balances to actual on-hand quantities.
Perpetual inventory is by far the preferred method for tracking inventory, since it can yield
reasonably accurate results on an ongoing basis, if properly managed. The system works best
when coupled with a computer database of inventory quantities and bin locations, which is
updated in real time by the warehouse staff using wireless bar code scanners, or by sales
clerks using point of sale terminals. It is least effective when changes are recorded on
inventory cards, since there is a significant chance that entries will not be made, or will be
made incorrectly.
Balance sheets complete the sequence of accounts, showing the ultimate result of the entriesin the production, distribution and use of income, and accumulation accounts.Balance sheets and accumulation accounts form a group of accounts that are concerned withthe value of assets owned by institutional units or sectors, and their liabilities at particular
points in time and with the evolution of those values over time. Balance sheets measure thevalues of stocks and are compiled at the beginning and end of the accounting period. On theother hand, the accumulation accounts record the changes in the values of assets and
liabilities during the accounting period. They are flow accounts, whose entries depend on theamounts of economic or other activities that take place within a given period of time.In the balance sheets three categories of assets are distinguished:a) non-financial produced assets
b) non-financial non-produced assetsc) financial assets
(i) Periodic stock verification
(ii) Continuous stock verification
(i) Periodic stock verification: It refers to a system where physical stock verification isnormally done periodically, i.e., once or twice in a year. Under this method, value of stock isdetermined by physical counting of the stock on a particular date, usually at the end of theyear.
It is a simple and economical method of stock-taking and is adopted in small concerns. Thistype of verification is good only for the items which do not find place in the perpetualinventory records, e.g., works-in-progress, components and consumable stores at site etc. Butthere are many limitations of this method. Stores may' be closed down for a few days tofacilitate stock-taking. There is possibility of fraud] discrepancy, etc.
(ii) Continuous stock verification: This system comprises of counting and verifying i number
of items at random daily throughout the year so that all items of stores are verified several
7/27/2019 SCR Asset G
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scr-asset-g 17/18
times during the year. Notice of the particular stock to be verified each clay is given to thestore-keeper only on the date of actual verification.
As there is an element of surprise check in this system of stock-taking, effective control over the items of stores can be exercised. The system does not necessitate the closing down of the
stores to facilitate stock-taking. There is also less possibility of fraud and discrepancy, but themethod is expensive and is adopted by big concerns only.
The actual stock of material should not differ from the recorded stock under normalcircumstances. But-sometimes differences arise due to the following reasons:
(i) Breakage and wastage of materials due to improper handling.
(ii) Shrinkage and evaporation.
In earlier periods, non-continuous, or periodic inventory systems were more prevalent.Starting in the 1970s digital computers made possible the ability to implement a perpetualinventory system. This has been facilitated by bar coding and lately radio frequencyidentification (RFID) labeling which allows computer systems to quickly read and processinventory information as part of transaction processing.
Perpetual inventory systems can still be vulnerable to errors due to overstatements (phantominventory) or understatements (missing inventory) that can occur as a result of theft, breakage,scanning errors or untracked inventory movements, leading to systematic errors inreplenishment.
The ESA95 recommends the Perpetual Inventory Method (PIM) for the calculation of thestock of Fixed assets whenever direct information is missing (par. 6.04). The calculation of consumption of Fixed capital can be based on these stocks of assets. Besides net capital stock which appears in the Balance sheets can be derived within a PIM approach. In this paragraphthe basic principles of the PIM will be discussed. Using the PIM, gross capital stock iscalculated as the sum of gross fixed capital formation in Previous years, of which the servicelive is not yet expired. In the simplest case it is assumed that the total investment of a
particular asset does not deteriorate during the expected service life of that asset and isdiscarded as a whole after that period of time.
Becoming a preferred employer involves more than learning the characteristics of such an
organization, however—it also requires that you understand what top performers want and
value in a relationship with an employer. Interestingly, the answers to both questions are the
same.
To begin with, top-tier employers offer more than competitive pay and benefits. In fact, the
word "competitive" implies that you're simply matching what many other businesses are
providing. Even important additional elements, such as a good environment and open
7/27/2019 SCR Asset G
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/scr-asset-g 18/18
communication, won't necessarily make the difference.
Studies show that the most important factor is how people feel about their role in the
business. Employees perform at different levels based on how they're engaged in the
lifeblood activities of the company. When an employer brings in people who are talented,
aligned with the company's values and focused on its goals, the results can be tremendous.
Want to set your company apart from your competitors? Here are some steps that can help
you draw the best people to your business:
top related