anhang978-3-658-14582...“, brian adamik, ana-lyst bei yankee group (the philadelphia inquirer,...

61
Anhang © Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016 S. Schmal, Konsolidierungswellen und Prognoseverhalten von Finanzanalysten, DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-14582-8

Upload: others

Post on 12-Aug-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Anhang

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016S. Schmal, Konsolidierungswellen und Prognoseverhalten von Finanzanalysten,DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-14582-8

Page 2: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

254 Anhang

Tabelle A.1: Analystenaußerungen zu Konsolidierungswellen1311 Gewinnung von Erdol und Erdgas

”The Exxon-Mobil deal comes during a period of rapid oil industry consolidati-on.“, John D. Hervey, Analyst bei Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette (The Washing-ton Post, 1999b).

”To see how extreme the consolidation drive has become in the energy indus-try, consider the $4.4 billion combination of Public Service Co. of New Mexicoand Western Resources Inc. It shows how crazy consolidation has become.“, TimO’Brien, Analyst bei Gabelli Utilities Fund (Daily Deal, 2001).

2711 Zeitungsverlag und -druckerei

”Newspapers, fairly recently, have started to pick up some steam. There is goingto be a rush to assemble a bunch of groups of stations, so you’ll see massive con-solidation.“, John Reidy, Analyst bei Smith Barney Shearson (The WashingtonPost, 1995).

”There’s always a risk that you can overconsolidate.“, Sig Gissler, Analyst undWirtschaftsjournalist (The New York Times, 1998).

3674 Halbleiter und verwandte Artikel

”The industry is ripe for consolidation.“, Andy Neff, Analyst bei Bear Stearns(San Jose Mercury News, 2001).

4812 Drahtlose Telekommunikation

”Critical mass is becoming more and more important in the paging industry,which is undergoing a phase of consolidation and is being dominated by fewer, lar-ger players.“, Linda Runyon, Analystin bei Merrill Lynch & Company (The NewYork Times, 1995).

4813 Telekommunikation (außer drahtlos)

”The deal also fanned speculation about another wave of consolidation in the te-lephone industry.“, Simon Flannery, Analyst bei J. P. Morgan & Company (TheNew York Times, 1996b).

4832 Radiosendestationen

”Perhaps no industry has seen greater consolidation than radio. Before the Te-lecommunications Act, broadcasters were limited to 36 radio stations, with up tofour in a market. The act lifted national ownership limits.“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998).

4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV

”Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation of the cable industry]is going to happen in every other area. It’s totally expectable, it’s totally reasona-ble and is totally desirable for someone to consolidate all the systems in a givenmarketing region.“, Paul Kagan, Industrieanalyst (San Jose Mercury News, 1994).

4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV

Page 3: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Anhang 255

”Time Warner squeezed out more growth than other cablers, although it may becost-savings coming from consolidation of cable systems acquired in recent years.“,Fred Moran, Analyst bei ING Barings (Daily Variety, 1999).

”Most recently, though, cable firms have deferred further consolidation.“, Ray-mond Katz, Analyst bei Bear & Stearns (Investor’s Business Daily, 2000).

5112 Schreibwaren und Burobedarf

”The rationale for consolidations would be to drive harder bargains with manu-facturers, and further push down retailers’ costs.“, unabhangige Analysten (TheGlobe and Mail, 1997).

5812 Restaurants und Schnellimbiß

”There’s a lot of consolidation going on. Restaurant Group is being associatedwith potential corporate activity, though it would be a shame to see that growthstory taken away by a bid.“, Douglas Jack, Analyst bei Panmure Gordon (DailyMail, 2006).

5912 Drogerien, Apotheken

”Depressed pharmacy gross margins are what is driving consolidation in this in-dustry. The insurance companies are squeezing the drug retailers on reimburse-ment levels. As the retailers get larger, they regain some of the power they relin-quished to insurance providers.“, Julie Silberstein, Analystin bei Bankers Trust(The New York Times, 1997a).

7011 Hotels, Motels

”We’re going to see the continued consolidation as long as the economics of buy-ing remain better than building. It just makes sense.“, Jason N. Ader, Analyst beiBear, Sterns & Co. (The Washington Post, 1997b).

7375 Informationsbeschaffungsdienste

”At the moment, the name of the game is who moves faster than the competitionsurvives. Speed of consolidation is the key.“, Christian Kern, Analyst bei SalomonSmith Barney (The New York Times, 1999b).

”This is a tsunami wave. If you look at Web mergers and acquisitions as a seriesof hills and valleys, this is the first small hill. We’re just at the beginning.“, TimMiller, Analyst bei New Media Resources (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 2000).

8011 Arztpraxen (ohne Kliniken)

”The whole health care market is overbuilt. We are still pretty early in the ballgame in terms of consolidation.“, Larry Feinberg, Analyst bei Oracle Partners(The New York Times, 1996c).

”The industry consolidation has moved at a very rapid pace. But that rapid ex-pansion is going to slow down as people get their bearings and turn their attentiontoward the business process.“, John David Chapman, Analyst bei SunTrust Banks(The American Banker, 1998).

Page 4: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

256 Anhang

8062 Allgemeine Krankenhauser

”Being private gave them the flexibility needed to streamline the operations. Nowthat that’s been done, they’re going back to a growth mode to take advantage ofconsolidation in the hospital industry, and they need access to capital.“, JohnRunniger, an analyst with Robinson-Humphrey Co. (The Washington Post,1992).

”This is the third announcement of a mega-merger in the last month. It is followi-ng a pattern of rapid consolidation in the hospitals industry.“, Ken Abramowitz,Analyst bei Sanford C. Bernstein & Company (The New York Times, 1996a).

8082 Heimpflegedienste

”We have a lot of consolidation going on in outpatient rehabilitation in order tomove it away from the hospitals, where it’s more expensive.“, Bernard Lirola,Analyst bei Needham & Company (The New York Times, 1997b).

Page 5: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Anhang 257

Tabe

lleA

.2:R

egre

ssio

nser

gebn

isse

zum

Her

denv

erha

lten

der

Fina

nzan

alys

ten

mit

max

imal

8-Ja

hres

Wel

lenp

erio

den

Abh

angi

geVa

riab

le:A

naly

stH

erdi

nga

Fixe

d-E

ffect

s-R

egre

ssio

nbR

ando

m-E

ffect

s-R

egre

ssio

nbO

LSm

itro

bust

enSt

anda

rdfe

hler

nc

Vari

able

nM

odel

l1a

Mod

ell2

aM

odel

l3a

Mod

ell1

bM

odel

l2b

Mod

ell3

bM

odel

l1c

Mod

ell2

cM

odel

l3c

Kon

stan

te3,

350*

3,97

5**

4,16

8**

5,30

3***

5,39

7***

5,49

7***

4,66

6***

4,55

1***

4,61

9***

(1,8

97)

(1,8

95)

(1,8

92)

(1,4

99)

(1,4

95)

(1,4

93)

(1,0

76)

(1,0

75)

(1,0

71)

Hyp

othe

tisie

rten

Vari

able

nK

onso

lidie

rung

swel

le1,

498*

**1,

318*

**1,

187*

**0,

958*

*0,

948*

*0,

652

(0,4

45)

(0,4

51)

(0,3

83)

(0,3

93)

(0,4

15)

(0,4

31)

Peak

jahr

1,12

3**

1,13

9**

1,26

0*(0

,498

)(0

,456

)(0

,677

)K

ontr

ollv

aria

blen

Ana

lyst

enan

zahl

-0,0

39-0

,039

-0,0

42-0

,030

-0,0

31-0

,032

-0,0

13-0

,014

-0,0

14(0

,027

)(0

,027

)(0

,027

)(0

,023

)(0

,023

)(0

,023

)(0

,017

)(0

,017

)(0

,017

)G

ewin

nvol

atili

tat

1,26

91,

379

1,49

90,

006

0,08

60,

156

-0,1

94-0

,172

-0,1

41(1

,281

)(1

,274

)(1

,272

)(0

,940

)(0

,938

)(0

,936

)(1

,264

)(1

,266

)(1

,251

)U

nter

nehm

ensg

roße

-0,0

39-0

,103

-0,1

30-0

,326

**-0

,330

**-0

,340

***

-0,2

32**

-0,2

23**

-0,2

29**

(0,2

09)

(0,2

08)

(0,2

08)

(0,1

29)

(0,1

29)

(0,1

29)

(0,1

04)

(0,1

03)

(0,1

03)

Verl

ust

0,76

3**

0,69

4**

0,64

3*0,

982*

**0,

926*

**0,

873*

**1,

007*

**0,

967*

**0,

901*

**(0

,339

)(0

,338

)(0

,338

)(0

,294

)(0

,293

)(0

,293

)(0

,348

)(0

,346

)(0

,341

)E

PS-

And

erun

g0,

973*

*0,

847*

0,89

6**

0,92

8**

0,83

5**

0,86

5**

0,96

9**

0,91

1**

0,93

3**

(0,4

43)

(0,4

42)

(0,4

42)

(0,3

82)

(0,3

82)

(0,3

81)

(0,4

47)

(0,4

44)

(0,4

40)

Bra

nche

neffe

kte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

hres

effek

teJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

Qua

rtal

seffe

kte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

Ja

N12

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

72A

nzah

lFir

men

354

354

354

354

354

354

R2

0,08

60,

097

0,10

30,

118

0,12

20,

127

0,13

50,

140

0,14

4F-

Wer

t/χ

2 -Wer

t2,

990

3,31

13,

385

156,

7716

7,05

169,

516,

043

5,96

95,

851

Pro

b>F/

Pro

b>χ

20,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

aW

inso

risi

ert

aufd

em1%

-Qua

ntilw

ert

anbe

iden

Vert

eilu

ngse

nden

;bSt

anda

rdfe

hler

inK

lam

mer

;cR

obus

teSt

anda

rdfe

hler

inK

lam

mer

nB

ranc

hen-

,Jah

res-

und

Qua

rtal

seffe

kte

nich

tau

fgef

uhrt

;***

p<0,

01,*

*p<

0,05

,*p<

0,1

Page 6: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

258 AnhangTabelle

A.3:R

egressionsergebnissezum

Uberoptim

ismus

derFinanzanalysten

mit

maxim

al8-JahresW

ellenperiodenA

bhangigeVariable:A

nalystSurprise a

Fixed-Effects-R

egressionb

Random

-Effects-R

egressionb

OLS

mit

robustenStandardfehlern

c

VariablenM

odell1aM

odell2aM

odell3aM

odell1bM

odell2bM

odell3bM

odell1cM

odell2cM

odell3c

Konstante

-0,728-0,598

-0,5570,219

0,2200,238

0,426*0,399

0,414*(0,490)

(0,491)(0,491)

(0,359)(0,359)

(0,359)(0,245)

(0,243)(0,242)

Hypothetisierten

VariablenK

onsolidierungswelle

0,310***0,270**

0,242***0,194**

0,213**0,161*

(0,115)(0,117)

(0,094)(0,097)

(0,085)(0,093)

Peakjahr0,247*

0,225**0,221*

(0,129)(0,114)

(0,124)K

ontrollvariablenA

nalystenanzahl0,003

0,0030,003

-0,002-0,003

-0,003-0,006*

-0,006*-0,006*

(0,007)(0,007)

(0,007)(0,005)

(0,005)(0,005)

(0,004)(0,004)

(0,004)P

rognosestreuung0,259*

0,275**0,255*

0,0780,088

0,076-0,006

-0,001-0,015

(0,138)(0,138)

(0,138)(0,106)

(0,106)(0,106)

(0,101)(0,102)

(0,102)G

ewinnvolatilitat

0,3230,345

0,3720,002

0,0160,027

-0,036-0,031

-0,025(0,331)

(0,330)(0,330)

(0,223)(0,223)

(0,223)(0,218)

(0,217)(0,215)

Unternehm

ensgroße0,106*

0,092*0,087

-0,005-0,004

-0,006-0,012

-0,010-0,011

(0,054)(0,054)

(0,054)(0,029)

(0,029)(0,029)

(0,017)(0,017)

(0,017)Verlust

0,435***0,420***

0,410***0,450***

0,439***0,429***

0,428***0,419***

0,409***(0,088)

(0,088)(0,088)

(0,072)(0,072)

(0,072)(0,096)

(0,095)(0,095)

EP

S-Anderung

0,274**0,249**

0,259**0,350***

0,332***0,336***

0,379**0,366**

0,369**(0,115)

(0,115)(0,115)

(0,093)(0,094)

(0,093)(0,169)

(0,170)(0,169)

Brancheneffekte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJahreseffekte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaQ

uartalseffekteJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

N1272

12721272

12721272

12721272

12721272

AnzahlFirm

en354

354354

354354

354R

20,107

0,1150,118

0,1510,155

0,1580,156

0,1600,163

F-Wert/

χ2-W

ert3,686

3,8293,833

177,78184,89

188,963,717

3,8774,086

Prob

>F/P

rob>

χ2

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,000a

Winsorisiert

aufdem1%

-Quantilw

ertan

beidenVerteilungsenden;

bStandardfehler

inK

lamm

er;c

Robuste

Standardfehlerin

Klam

mern

Branchen-,Jahres-und

Quartalseffekte

nichtaufgefuhrt;***

p<

0,01,**p

<0,05,*

p<

0,1

Page 7: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Anhang 259

Tabe

lleA

.4:R

egre

ssio

nser

gebn

isse

zum

Her

denv

erha

lten

der

Fina

nzan

alys

ten

mit

max

imal

6-Ja

hres

Wel

lenp

erio

den

Abh

angi

geVa

riab

le:A

naly

stH

erdi

nga

Fixe

d-E

ffect

s-R

egre

ssio

nbR

ando

m-E

ffect

s-R

egre

ssio

nbO

LSm

itro

bust

enSt

anda

rdfe

hler

nc

Vari

able

nM

odel

l1a

Mod

ell2

aM

odel

l3a

Mod

ell1

bM

odel

l2b

Mod

ell3

bM

odel

l1c

Mod

ell2

cM

odel

l3c

Kon

stan

te3,

350*

3,77

3**

3,94

9**

5,30

4***

5,44

1***

5,51

7***

4,66

7***

4,62

7***

4,68

2***

(1,8

97)

(1,8

99)

(1,8

96)

(1,4

99)

(1,4

98)

(1,4

95)

(1,0

76)

(1,0

84)

(1,0

73)

Hyp

othe

tisie

rten

Vari

able

nK

onso

lidie

rung

swel

le1,

026*

*0,

787*

0,80

5**

0,52

30,

674*

0,31

9(0

,418

)(0

,430

)(0

,362

)(0

,377

)(0

,399

)(0

,421

)Pe

akja

hr1,

154*

*1,

214*

**1,

352*

*(0

,507

)(0

,464

)(0

,687

)K

ontr

ollv

aria

blen

Ana

lyst

enan

zahl

-0,0

39-0

,041

-0,0

43-0

,030

-0,0

32-0

,033

-0,0

13-0

,015

-0,0

14(0

,027

)(0

,027

)(0

,027

)(0

,023

)(0

,023

)(0

,023

)(0

,017

)(0

,017

)(0

,017

)G

ewin

nvol

atili

tat

1,26

91,

209

1,36

00,

006

-0,0

190,

081

-0,1

94-0

,249

-0,1

80(1

,281

)(1

,278

)(1

,276

)(0

,940

)(0

,939

)(0

,938

)(1

,264

)(1

,271

)(1

,253

)U

nter

nehm

ensg

roße

-0,0

39-0

,060

-0,0

91-0

,326

**-0

,323

**-0

,336

***

-0,2

32**

-0,2

22**

-0,2

30**

(0,2

09)

(0,2

08)

(0,2

08)

(0,1

29)

(0,1

29)

(0,1

29)

(0,1

04)

(0,1

03)

(0,1

03)

Verl

ust

0,76

3**

0,75

1**

0,69

2**

0,98

2***

0,97

4***

0,90

9***

1,00

7***

0,99

8***

0,91

9***

(0,3

39)

(0,3

38)

(0,3

39)

(0,2

94)

(0,2

93)

(0,2

93)

(0,3

48)

(0,3

47)

(0,3

43)

EP

S-A

nder

ung

0,97

3**

0,89

6**

0,95

0**

0,92

7**

0,86

1**

0,89

8**

0,96

9**

0,93

0**

0,95

6**

(0,4

43)

(0,4

43)

(0,4

42)

(0,3

82)

(0,3

83)

(0,3

82)

(0,4

47)

(0,4

43)

(0,4

38)

Bra

nche

neffe

kte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

hres

effek

teJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

Qua

rtal

seffe

kte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

Ja

N12

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

72A

nzah

lFir

men

354

354

354

354

354

354

R2

0,08

60,

092

0,09

70,

118

0,12

00,

125

0,13

50,

138

0,14

3F-

Wer

t/χ

2 -Wer

t2,

990

3,11

13,

194

156,

7616

1,98

169,

516,

043

6,07

55,

879

Pro

b>F/

Pro

b>χ

20,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

aW

inso

risi

ert

aufd

em1%

-Qua

ntilw

ert

anbe

iden

Vert

eilu

ngse

nden

;bSt

anda

rdfe

hler

inK

lam

mer

;cR

obus

teSt

anda

rdfe

hler

inK

lam

mer

nB

ranc

hen-

,Jah

res-

und

Qua

rtal

seffe

kte

nich

tau

fgef

uhrt

;***

p<0,

01,*

*p<

0,05

,*p<

0,1

Page 8: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

260 AnhangTabelle

A.5:R

egressionsergebnissezum

Uberoptim

ismus

derFinanzanalysten

mit

maxim

al6-JahresW

ellenperiodenA

bhangigeVariable:A

nalystSurprise a

Fixed-Effects-R

egressionb

Random

-Effects-R

egressionb

OLS

mit

robustenStandardfehlern

c

VariablenM

odell1aM

odell2aM

odell3aM

odell1bM

odell2bM

odell3bM

odell1cM

odell2cM

odell3c

Konstante

-0,728-0,603

-0,5690,219

0,2400,252

0,426*0,421*

0,434*(0,490)

(0,490)(0,490)

(0,359)(0,359)

(0,359)(0,245)

(0,246)(0,245)

Hypothetisierten

VariablenK

onsolidierungswelle

0,303***0,256**

0,187**0,131

0,128**0,062

(0,108)(0,111)

(0,089)(0,093)

(0,062)(0,066)

Peakjahr0,226*

0,233**0,252**

(0,131)(0,116)

(0,121)K

ontrollvariablenA

nalystenanzahl0,003

0,0030,002

-0,002-0,003

-0,003-0,006*

-0,007*-0,006*

(0,007)(0,007)

(0,007)(0,005)

(0,005)(0,005)

(0,004)(0,004)

(0,004)P

rognosestreuung0,259*

0,254*0,238*

0,0780,070

0,062-0,006

-0,015-0,025

(0,138)(0,138)

(0,138)(0,106)

(0,106)(0,106)

(0,101)(0,102)

(0,103)G

ewinnvolatilitat

0,3230,305

0,3350,002

-0,0050,012

-0,036-0,046

-0,032(0,331)

(0,330)(0,330)

(0,223)(0,223)

(0,223)(0,218)

(0,219)(0,216)

Unternehm

ensgroße0,106*

0,100*0,095*

-0,005-0,003

-0,005-0,012

-0,010-0,012

(0,054)(0,054)

(0,054)(0,029)

(0,029)(0,029)

(0,017)(0,018)

(0,017)Verlust

0,435***0,432***

0,421***0,450***

0,449***0,437***

0,428***0,428***

0,415***(0,088)

(0,087)(0,088)

(0,072)(0,072)

(0,072)(0,096)

(0,095)(0,096)

EP

S-Anderung

0,274**0,251**

0,261**0,350***

0,334***0,339***

0,379**0,371**

0,375**(0,115)

(0,114)(0,114)

(0,093)(0,094)

(0,094)(0,169)

(0,169)(0,169)

Brancheneffekte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJahreseffekte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaQ

uartalseffekteJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

N1272

12721272

12721272

12721272

12721272

AnzahlFirm

en354

354354

354354

354R

20,107

0,1150,118

0,1510,152

0,1560,156

0,1580,161

F-Wert/

χ2-W

ert3,686

3,8553,834

177,78182,44

186,743,717

3,7864,026

Prob

>F/P

rob>

χ2

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,000a

Winsorisiert

aufdem1%

-Quantilw

ertan

beidenVerteilungsenden;

bStandardfehler

inK

lamm

er;c

Robuste

Standardfehlerin

Klam

mern

Branchen-,Jahres-und

Quartalseffekte

nichtaufgefuhrt;***

p<

0,01,**p

<0,05,*

p<

0,1

Page 9: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Anhang 261

Tabe

lleA

.6:R

egre

ssio

nser

gebn

isse

zum

Her

denv

erha

lten

der

Fina

nzan

alys

ten

mit

Win

soris

ieru

ngau

f5%

-Qua

ntil

Abh

angi

geVa

riab

le:A

naly

stH

erdi

nga

Fixe

d-E

ffect

s-R

egre

ssio

nbR

ando

m-E

ffect

s-R

egre

ssio

nbO

LSm

itro

bust

enSt

anda

rdfe

hler

nc

Vari

able

nM

odel

l1a

Mod

ell2

aM

odel

l3a

Mod

ell1

bM

odel

l2b

Mod

ell3

bM

odel

l1c

Mod

ell2

cM

odel

l3c

Kon

stan

te3,

208*

*3,

448*

*3,

662*

**4,

225*

**4,

167*

**4,

259*

**3,

859*

**3,

729*

**3,

808*

**(1

,377

)(1

,374

)(1

,369

)(0

,992

)(0

,992

)(0

,990

)(0

,805

)(0

,810

)(0

,803

)H

ypot

hetis

iert

enVa

riab

len

Kon

solid

ieru

ngsw

elle

0,91

6***

0,74

7**

0,60

6**

0,40

90,

532*

0,31

0(0

,308

)(0

,312

)(0

,249

)(0

,257

)(0

,277

)(0

,284

)Pe

akja

hr1,

083*

**0,

959*

**0,

979*

*(0

,361

)(0

,319

)(0

,412

)K

ontr

ollv

aria

blen

Ana

lyst

enan

zahl

-0,0

13-0

,015

-0,0

17-0

,011

-0,0

13-0

,013

-0,0

04-0

,006

-0,0

06(0

,019

)(0

,019

)(0

,019

)(0

,015

)(0

,015

)(0

,015

)(0

,012

)(0

,012

)(0

,012

)G

ewin

nvol

atili

tat

0,43

30,

476

0,59

6-0

,156

-0,1

49-0

,097

-0,0

69-0

,082

-0,0

47(0

,930

)(0

,926

)(0

,923

)(0

,616

)(0

,616

)(0

,615

)(0

,753

)(0

,758

)(0

,748

)U

nter

nehm

ensg

roße

-0,0

82-0

,090

-0,1

23-0

,194

**-0

,185

**-0

,195

**-0

,146

**-0

,134

**-0

,141

**(0

,152

)(0

,151

)(0

,151

)(0

,081

)(0

,081

)(0

,081

)(0

,066

)(0

,066

)(0

,065

)Ve

rlus

t0,

446*

0,45

0*0,

391

0,57

9***

0,57

8***

0,52

4***

0,57

6***

0,57

4***

0,51

4**

(0,2

46)

(0,2

45)

(0,2

45)

(0,1

99)

(0,1

99)

(0,1

99)

(0,2

13)

(0,2

12)

(0,2

12)

EP

S-A

nder

ung

0,83

0**

0,77

0**

0,81

5**

0,96

3***

0,92

6***

0,94

2***

1,01

2***

0,98

6***

1,00

0***

(0,3

22)

(0,3

21)

(0,3

20)

(0,2

59)

(0,2

59)

(0,2

59)

(0,3

20)

(0,3

18)

(0,3

15)

Bra

nche

neffe

kte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

hres

effek

teJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

Qua

rtal

seffe

kte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

Ja

N12

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

72A

nzah

lFir

men

354

354

354

354

354

354

R2

0,10

80,

116

0,12

50,

165

0,16

80,

175

0,17

40,

178

0,18

4F-

Wer

t/χ

2 -Wer

t3,

830

4,03

54,

235

213,

3321

9,58

229,

577,

708

7,65

47,

549

Pro

b>F/

Pro

b>χ

20,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

aW

inso

risi

ert

aufd

em1%

-Qua

ntilw

ert

anbe

iden

Vert

eilu

ngse

nden

;bSt

anda

rdfe

hler

inK

lam

mer

;cR

obus

teSt

anda

rdfe

hler

inK

lam

mer

nB

ranc

hen-

,Jah

res-

und

Qua

rtal

seffe

kte

nich

tau

fgef

uhrt

;***

p<0,

01,*

*p<

0,05

,*p<

0,1

Page 10: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

262 AnhangTabelle

A.7:R

egressionsergebnissezum

Uberoptim

ismus

derFinanzanalysten

mit

Winsorisierung

auf5%-Q

uantilA

bhangigeVariable:A

nalystSurprise a

Fixed-Effects-R

egressionb

Random

-Effects-R

egressionb

OLS

mit

robustenStandardfehlern

c

VariablenM

odell1aM

odell2aM

odell3aM

odell1bM

odell2bM

odell3bM

odell1cM

odell2cM

odell3c

Konstante

-0,279-0,232

-0,2150,323**

0,305*0,318**

0,362***0,336***

0,349***(0,223)

(0,222)(0,222)

(0,157)(0,157)

(0,156)(0,126)

(0,126)(0,125)

Hypothetisierten

VariablenK

onsolidierungswelle

0,178***0,163***

0,116***0,090**

0,104***0,073**

(0,050)(0,051)

(0,040)(0,041)

(0,035)(0,036)

Peakjahr0,162*

0,122**0,134**

(0,096)(0,052)

(0,055)K

ontrollvariablenA

nalystenanzahl0,002

0,0010,001

-0,002-0,002

-0,002-0,003

-0,003*-0,003*

(0,003)(0,003)

(0,003)(0,002)

(0,002)(0,002)

(0,002)(0,002)

(0,002)P

rognosestreuung0,098

0,108*0,101

0,0360,041

0,0340,026

0,0290,020

(0,063)(0,063)

(0,063)(0,046)

(0,046)(0,046)

(0,060)(0,060)

(0,061)G

ewinnvolatilitat

0,1800,188

0,1980,021

0,0220,028

0,0140,011

0,016(0,150)

(0,149)(0,149)

(0,097)(0,097)

(0,097)(0,113)

(0,112)(0,110)

Unternehm

ensgroße0,072***

0,070***0,068***

-0,016-0,014

-0,015-0,017*

-0,015-0,016*

(0,025)(0,024)

(0,025)(0,012)

(0,012)(0,012)

(0,009)(0,009)

(0,009)Verlust

0,288***0,288***

0,283***0,317***

0,316***0,310***

0,313***0,312***

0,305***(0,040)

(0,040)(0,040)

(0,032)(0,032)

(0,032)(0,045)

(0,045)(0,046)

EP

S-Anderung

0,142***0,131**

0,134***0,169***

0,162***0,164***

0,180***0,175**

0,176***(0,052)

(0,052)(0,052)

(0,041)(0,041)

(0,041)(0,068)

(0,068)(0,067)

Brancheneffekte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJahreseffekte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaQ

uartalseffekteJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

N1272

12721272

12721272

12721272

12721272

AnzahlFirm

en354

354354

354354

354R

20,158

0,1700,172

0,2550,259

0,2640,258

0,2630,267

F-Wert/

χ2-W

ert5,735

6,0425,932

344,49353,36

360,887,687

8,4548,588

Prob

>F/P

rob>

χ2

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,000a

Winsorisiert

aufdem1%

-Quantilw

ertan

beidenVerteilungsenden;

bStandardfehler

inK

lamm

er;c

Robuste

Standardfehlerin

Klam

mern

Branchen-,Jahres-und

Quartalseffekte

nichtaufgefuhrt;***

p<

0,01,**p

<0,05,*

p<

0,1

Page 11: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Anhang 263

Tabe

lleA

.8:R

egre

ssio

nser

gebn

isse

zum

Her

denv

erha

lten

der

Fina

nzan

alys

ten

ohne

die

Varia

ble

Unt

erne

hmen

sgro

ßeA

bhan

gige

Vari

able

:Ana

lyst

Her

ding

aFi

xed-

Effe

cts-

Reg

ress

ionb

Ran

dom

-Effe

cts-

Reg

ress

ionb

OLS

mit

robu

sten

Stan

dard

fehl

ernc

Vari

able

nM

odel

l1a

Mod

ell2

aM

odel

l3a

Mod

ell1

bM

odel

l2b

Mod

ell3

bM

odel

l1c

Mod

ell2

cM

odel

l3c

Kon

stan

te3,

137*

*3,

366*

*3,

406*

*3,

654*

**3,

674*

**3,

733*

**3,

455*

**3,

343*

**3,

398*

**(1

,520

)(1

,518

)(1

,514

)(1

,352

)(1

,349

)(1

,346

)(0

,881

)(0

,893

)(0

,884

)H

ypot

hetis

iert

enVa

riab

len

Kon

solid

ieru

ngsw

elle

1,05

9**

0,87

3**

0,93

7**

0,71

5*0,

854*

*0,

569

(0,4

25)

(0,4

31)

(0,3

68)

(0,3

78)

(0,3

91)

(0,4

01)

Peak

jahr

1,18

4**

1,15

8**

1,26

7*(0

,498

)(0

,457

)(0

,670

)K

ontr

ollv

aria

blen

Ana

lyst

enan

zahl

-0,0

404

-0,0

435*

-0,0

471*

-0,0

61**

*-0

,063

***

-0,0

64**

*-0

,043

***

-0,0

44**

*-0

,045

***

(0,0

255)

(0,0

254)

(0,0

254)

(0,0

19)

(0,0

19)

(0,0

19)

(0,0

13)

(0,0

13)

(0,0

13)

Gew

innv

olat

ilita

t1,

320

1,38

21,

560

0,32

90,

342

0,43

80,

003

-0,0

330,

019

(1,2

51)

(1,2

47)

(1,2

46)

(0,9

35)

(0,9

33)

(0,9

32)

(1,2

78)

(1,2

86)

(1,2

71)

Unt

erne

hmen

sgro

ße

Verl

ust

0,76

6**

0,77

1**

0,70

9**

1,06

3***

1,06

1***

0,99

9***

1,10

6***

1,09

7***

1,02

3***

(0,3

39)

(0,3

38)

(0,3

38)

(0,2

92)

(0,2

92)

(0,2

92)

(0,3

57)

(0,3

54)

(0,3

49)

EP

S-A

nder

ung

0,98

1**

0,91

3**

0,96

9**

1,02

8***

0,96

4**

0,99

5***

1,04

8**

1,00

0**

1,02

2**

(0,4

41)

(0,4

40)

(0,4

40)

(0,3

81)

(0,3

81)

(0,3

80)

(0,4

49)

(0,4

47)

(0,4

42)

Bra

nche

neffe

kte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

hres

effek

teJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

Qua

rtal

seffe

kte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

Ja

N12

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

72A

nzah

lFir

men

354

354

354

354

354

354

R2

0,08

60,

092

0,09

80,

115

0,11

90,

124

0,13

10,

135

0,14

0F-

Wer

t/χ

2 -Wer

t3,

102

3,23

13,

331

149,

3915

6,44

163,

395,

996

5,93

15,

824

Pro

b>F/

Pro

b>χ

20,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

aW

inso

risi

ert

aufd

em1%

-Qua

ntilw

ert

anbe

iden

Vert

eilu

ngse

nden

;bSt

anda

rdfe

hler

inK

lam

mer

;cR

obus

teSt

anda

rdfe

hler

inK

lam

mer

nB

ranc

hen-

,Jah

res-

und

Qua

rtal

seffe

kte

nich

tau

fgef

uhrt

;***

p<0,

01,*

*p<

0,05

,*p<

0,1

Page 12: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

264 AnhangTabelle

A.9:R

egressionsergebnissezum

Uberoptim

ismus

derFinanzanalysten

ohnedie

VariableU

nternehmensgroße

Abhangige

Variable:Analyst

Surprise aFixed-E

ffects-Regression

bR

andom-E

ffects-Regression

bO

LSm

itrobusten

Standardfehlernc

VariablenM

odell1aM

odell2aM

odell3aM

odell1bM

odell2bM

odell3bM

odell1cM

odell2cM

odell3c

Konstante

-0,156-0,0879

-0,07540,196

0,1890,202

0,364*0,338

0,352*(0,394)

(0,393)(0,393)

(0,327)(0,326)

(0,326)(0,212)

(0,210)(0,210)

Hypothetisierten

VariablenK

onsolidierungswelle

0,329***0,288**

0,229**0,184**

0,184**0,133*

(0,110)(0,112)

(0,089)(0,092)

(0,073)(0,078)

Peakjahr0,254**

0,225**0,228*

(0,129)(0,114)

(0,121)K

ontrollvariablenA

nalystenanzahl0,00747

0,006470,00574

-0,003-0,003

-0,003-0,008***

-0,008***-0,008***

(0,00661)(0,00659)

(0,00659)(0,004)

(0,004)(0,004)

(0,003)(0,003)

(0,003)P

rognosestreuung0,286**

0,304**0,282**

0,0770,087

0,075-0,008

-0,002-0,017

(0,138)(0,137)

(0,138)(0,106)

(0,106)(0,106)

(0,101)(0,102)

(0,102)G

ewinnvolatilitat

0,1840,204

0,2410,005

0,0060,021

-0,025-0,033

-0,023(0,324)

(0,323)(0,323)

(0,221)(0,221)

(0,221)(0,220)

(0,219)(0,218)

Unternehm

ensgroße

Verlust0,426***

0,427***0,414***

0,452***0,450***

0,439***0,434***

0,431***0,420***

(0,0878)(0,0874)

(0,0875)(0,072)

(0,071)(0,072)

(0,095)(0,094)

(0,095)E

PS-A

nderung0,255**

0,235**0,246**

0,352***0,336***

0,340***0,383**

0,373**0,376**

(0,114)(0,114)

(0,114)(0,093)

(0,093)(0,093)

(0,168)(0,169)

(0,168)B

rancheneffekteJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JahreseffekteJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

Quartalseffekte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

Ja

N1272

12721272

12721272

12721272

12721272

AnzahlFirm

en354

354354

354354

354R

20,103

0,1120,116

0,1510,154

0,1570,156

0,1600,162

F-Wert/

χ2-W

ert3,669

3,8823,894

178,1185,01

189,083,712

3,8404,059

Prob

>F/P

rob>

χ2

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,000a

Winsorisiert

aufdem1%

-Quantilw

ertan

beidenVerteilungsenden;

bStandardfehler

inK

lamm

er;c

Robuste

Standardfehlerin

Klam

mern

Branchen-,Jahres-und

Quartalseffekte

nichtaufgefuhrt;***

p<

0,01,**p

<0,05,*

p<

0,1

Page 13: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Anhang 265

Tabe

lleA

.10:

Reg

ress

ions

erge

bniss

ezu

mH

erde

nver

halte

nde

rFi

nanz

anal

yste

noh

nedi

eVa

riabl

eA

naly

sten

anza

hlA

bhan

gige

Vari

able

:Ana

lyst

Her

ding

aFi

xed-

Effe

cts-

Reg

ress

ionb

Ran

dom

-Effe

cts-

Reg

ress

ionb

OLS

mit

robu

sten

Stan

dard

fehl

ernc

Vari

able

nM

odel

l1a

Mod

ell2

aM

odel

l3a

Mod

ell1

bM

odel

l2b

Mod

ell3

bM

odel

l1c

Mod

ell2

cM

odel

l3c

Kon

stan

te3,

428*

3,70

5*3,

940*

*5,

510*

**5,

489*

**5,

625*

**4,

804*

**4,

650*

**4,

747*

**(1

,897

)(1

,895

)(1

,893

)(1

,491

)(1

,489

)(1

,487

)(1

,027

)(1

,022

)(1

,017

)H

ypot

hetis

iert

enVa

riab

len

Kon

solid

ieru

ngsw

elle

1,03

3**

0,85

0**

0,88

4**

0,65

1*0,

770*

*0,

474

(0,4

25)

(0,4

31)

(0,3

67)

(0,3

77)

(0,3

84)

(0,3

97)

Peak

jahr

1,16

9**

1,20

1***

1,31

2*(0

,499

)(0

,457

)(0

,675

)K

ontr

ollv

aria

blen

Ana

lyst

enan

zahl

Gew

innv

olat

ilita

t1,

336

1,38

91,

523

0,05

80,

084

0,16

9-0

,164

-0,1

75-0

,130

(1,2

81)

(1,2

78)

(1,2

76)

(0,9

39)

(0,9

38)

(0,9

36)

(1,2

58)

(1,2

64)

(1,2

47)

Unt

erne

hmen

sgro

ße-0

,131

-0,1

46-0

,187

-0,4

19**

*-0

,416

***

-0,4

32**

*-0

,278

***

-0,2

73**

*-0

,280

***

(0,1

99)

(0,1

99)

(0,1

99)

(0,1

09)

(0,1

09)

(0,1

09)

(0,0

77)

(0,0

77)

(0,0

77)

Verl

ust

0,78

0**

0,78

6**

0,72

3**

0,99

9***

1,00

0***

0,93

3***

1,01

8***

1,01

9***

0,93

8***

(0,3

39)

(0,3

38)

(0,3

39)

(0,2

93)

(0,2

93)

(0,2

93)

(0,3

48)

(0,3

47)

(0,3

43)

EP

S-A

nder

ung

0,95

8**

0,89

0**

0,93

7**

0,91

9**

0,86

2**

0,89

0**

0,97

2**

0,93

6**

0,95

5**

(0,4

43)

(0,4

43)

(0,4

42)

(0,3

82)

(0,3

82)

(0,3

81)

(0,4

45)

(0,4

43)

(0,4

39)

Bra

nche

neffe

kte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

hres

effek

teJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

Qua

rtal

seffe

kte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

Ja

N12

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

72A

nzah

lFir

men

354

354

354

354

354

354

R2

0,08

40,

090

0,09

50,

118

0,12

20,

127

0,13

50,

138

0,14

3F-

Wer

t/χ

2 -Wer

t3,

018

3,13

83,

233

154,

9216

1,13

168,

666,

165

6,06

56,

001

Pro

b>F/

Pro

b>χ

20,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

aW

inso

risi

ert

aufd

em1%

-Qua

ntilw

ert

anbe

iden

Vert

eilu

ngse

nden

;bSt

anda

rdfe

hler

inK

lam

mer

;cR

obus

teSt

anda

rdfe

hler

inK

lam

mer

nB

ranc

hen-

,Jah

res-

und

Qua

rtal

seffe

kte

nich

tau

fgef

uhrt

;***

p<0,

01,*

*p<

0,05

,*p<

0,1

Page 14: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

266 AnhangTabelle

A.11:R

egressionsergebnissezum

Uberoptim

ismus

derFinanzanalysten

ohnedie

VariableA

nalystenanzahlA

bhangigeVariable:A

nalystSurprise a

Fixed-Effects-R

egressionb

Random

-Effects-R

egressionb

OLS

mit

robustenStandardfehlern

c

VariablenM

odell1aM

odell2aM

odell3aM

odell1bM

odell2bM

odell3bM

odell1cM

odell2cM

odell3c

Konstante

-0,735-0,647

-0,5990,238

0,2180,241

0,492**0,456*

0,477**(0,490)

(0,489)(0,489)

(0,357)(0,356)

(0,356)(0,238)

(0,235)(0,235)

Hypothetisierten

VariablenK

onsolidierungswelle

0,326***0,288**

0,227**0,181*

0,172**0,119

(0,110)(0,112)

(0,090)(0,093)

(0,072)(0,077)

Peakjahr0,241*

0,225**0,232*

(0,129)(0,114)

(0,122)K

ontrollvariablenA

nalystenanzahl

Prognosestreuung

0,260*0,278**

0,258*0,078

0,0880,076

-0,0040,001

-0,014(0,138)

(0,138)(0,138)

(0,106)(0,106)

(0,106)(0,101)

(0,102)(0,103)

Gew

innvolatilitat0,317

0,3330,361

0,0060,011

0,025-0,021

-0,024-0,015

(0,331)(0,329)

(0,329)(0,222)

(0,222)(0,222)

(0,214)(0,213)

(0,211)U

nternehmensgroße

0,114**0,109**

0,101*-0,013

-0,011-0,013

-0,034**-0,033**

-0,034**(0,0517)

(0,0515)(0,0516)

(0,024)(0,024)

(0,024)(0,014)

(0,014)(0,014)

Verlust0,433***

0,435***0,422***

0,452***0,452***

0,440***0,434***

0,433***0,421***

(0,0877)(0,0873)

(0,0874)(0,072)

(0,072)(0,072)

(0,096)(0,095)

(0,096)E

PS-A

nderung0,276**

0,255**0,264**

0,349***0,335***

0,339***0,380**

0,372**0,375**

(0,115)(0,114)

(0,114)(0,093)

(0,093)(0,093)

(0,169)(0,169)

(0,168)B

rancheneffekteJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JahreseffekteJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

Quartalseffekte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

Ja

N1272

12721272

12721272

12721272

12721272

AnzahlFirm

en354

354354

354354

354R

20,107

0,1160,119

0,150,153

0,1560,155

0,1580,161

F-Wert/

χ2-W

ert3,812

4,0184,010

177,7184,48

188,573,745

3,7763,908

Prob

>F/P

rob>

χ2

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,000a

Winsorisiert

aufdem1%

-Quantilw

ertan

beidenVerteilungsenden;

bStandardfehler

inK

lamm

er;c

Robuste

Standardfehlerin

Klam

mern

Branchen-,Jahres-und

Quartalseffekte

nichtaufgefuhrt;***

p<

0,01,**p

<0,05,*

p<

0,1

Page 15: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Anhang 267

Tabe

lleA

.12:

Reg

ress

ions

erge

bniss

ezu

mH

erde

nver

halte

nde

rFi

nanz

anal

yste

noh

nedi

eA

ufna

hme

von

Qua

rtal

seffe

kten

Abh

angi

geVa

riab

le:A

naly

stH

erdi

nga

Fixe

d-E

ffect

s-R

egre

ssio

nbR

ando

m-E

ffect

s-R

egre

ssio

nbO

LSm

itro

bust

enSt

anda

rdfe

hler

nc

Vari

able

nM

odel

l1a

Mod

ell2

aM

odel

l3a

Mod

ell1

bM

odel

l2b

Mod

ell3

bM

odel

l1c

Mod

ell2

cM

odel

l3c

Kon

stan

te2,

696

2,98

83,

207*

4,61

0***

4,56

8***

4,69

7***

3,92

5***

3,71

8***

3,81

8***

(1,8

98)

(1,8

94)

(1,8

93)

(1,5

08)

(1,5

05)

(1,5

03)

(1,0

88)

(1,0

85)

(1,0

79)

Hyp

othe

tisie

rten

Vari

able

nK

onso

lidie

rung

swel

le1,

177*

**1,

002*

*0,

996*

**0,

779*

*0,

826*

*0,

549

(0,4

32)

(0,4

39)

(0,3

74)

(0,3

84)

(0,3

95)

(0,4

10)

Peak

jahr

1,12

8**

1,13

6**

1,22

6*(0

,509

)(0

,465

)(0

,673

)K

ontr

ollv

aria

blen

Ana

lyst

enan

zahl

-0,0

50*

-0,0

53*

-0,0

55**

-0,0

39*

-0,0

41*

-0,0

42*

-0,0

15-0

,018

-0,0

18(0

,027

)(0

,027

)(0

,027

)(0

,023

)(0

,023

)(0

,023

)(0

,017

)(0

,017

)(0

,017

)G

ewin

nvol

atili

tat

1,21

51,

271

1,39

50,

107

0,13

00,

211

0,03

00,

010

0,05

6(1

,305

)(1

,301

)(1

,299

)(0

,960

)(0

,959

)(0

,958

)(1

,215

)(1

,222

)(1

,207

)U

nter

nehm

ensg

roße

0,03

20,

022

-0,0

12-0

,281

**-0

,270

**-0

,283

**-0

,212

**-0

,194

*-0

,202

**(0

,212

)(0

,211

)(0

,211

)(0

,132

)(0

,132

)(0

,132

)(0

,103

)(0

,102

)(0

,102

)Ve

rlus

t0,

778*

*0,

784*

*0,

723*

*1,

015*

**1,

016*

**0,

952*

**0,

959*

*0,

918*

*0,

937*

*(0

,346

)(0

,344

)(0

,345

)(0

,299

)(0

,298

)(0

,299

)(0

,446

)(0

,444

)(0

,440

)E

PS-

And

erun

g0,

921*

*0,

843*

0,88

8**

0,89

5**

0,83

0**

0,85

7**

1,05

9***

1,05

7***

0,98

2***

(0,4

51)

(0,4

51)

(0,4

50)

(0,3

89)

(0,3

89)

(0,3

88)

(0,3

50)

(0,3

48)

(0,3

43)

Bra

nche

neffe

kte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

hres

effek

teJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

Qua

rtal

seffe

kte

Nei

nN

ein

Nei

nN

ein

Nei

nN

ein

Nei

nN

ein

Nei

n

N12

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

72A

nzah

lFir

men

354

354

354

354

354

354

R2

0,04

70,

054

0,06

00,

087

0,09

10,

095

0,10

30,

107

0,11

2F-

Wer

t/χ

2 -Wer

t1,

746

1,97

62,

093

99,2

610

6,62

112,

884,

427

4,43

04,

293

Pro

b>F/

Pro

b>χ

20,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

aW

inso

risi

ert

aufd

em1%

-Qua

ntilw

ert

anbe

iden

Vert

eilu

ngse

nden

;bSt

anda

rdfe

hler

inK

lam

mer

;cR

obus

teSt

anda

rdfe

hler

inK

lam

mer

nB

ranc

hen-

,Jah

res-

und

Qua

rtal

seffe

kte

nich

tau

fgef

uhrt

;***

p<0,

01,*

*p<

0,05

,*p<

0,1

Page 16: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

268 AnhangTabelle

A.13:R

egressionsergebnissezum

Uberoptim

ismus

derFinanzanalysten

ohnedie

Aufnahm

evon

Quartalseffekten

Abhangige

Variable:Analyst

Surprise aFixed-E

ffects-Regression

bR

andom-E

ffects-Regression

bO

LSm

itrobusten

Standardfehlernc

VariablenM

odell1aM

odell2aM

odell3aM

odell1bM

odell2bM

odell3bM

odell1cM

odell2cM

odell3c

Konstante

-0,823*-0,736

-0,6940,028

0,0040,025

0,2240,176

0,196(0,484)

(0,483)(0,483)

(0,358)(0,357)

(0,357)(0,226)

(0,225)(0,224)

Hypothetisierten

VariablenK

onsolidierungswelle

0,344***0,309***

0,246***0,203**

0,188**0,140*

(0,110)(0,112)

(0,091)(0,093)

(0,074)(0,079)

Peakjahr0,225*

0,211*0,211*

(0,130)(0,115)

(0,126)K

ontrollvariablenA

nalystenanzahl0,002

0,0010,000

-0,004-0,004

-0,004-0,007*

-0,007**-0,007**

(0,007)(0,007)

(0,007)(0,006)

(0,006)(0,005)

(0,004)(0,004)

(0,004)P

rognosestreuung0,327**

0,345**0,328**

0,1540,164

0,1530,043

0,0480,035

(0,137)(0,136)

(0,137)(0,107)

(0,107)(0,107)

(0,104)(0,106)

(0,106)G

ewinnvolatilitat

0,3180,334

0,3590,030

0,0340,047

0,0070,002

0,011(0,333)

(0,331)(0,331)

(0,226)(0,225)

(0,225)(0,230)

(0,229)(0,228)

Unternehm

ensgroße0,114**

0,110**0,105*

0,0020,006

0,004-0,008

-0,004-0,006

(0,054)(0,054)

(0,054)(0,030)

(0,030)(0,030)

(0,017)(0,017)

(0,017)Verlust

0,435***0,436***

0,425***0,454***

0,453***0,443***

0,433***0,432***

0,421***(0,088)

(0,088)(0,088)

(0,073)(0,073)

(0,073)(0,098)

(0,097)(0,098)

EP

S-Anderung

0,270**0,248**

0,257**0,345***

0,330***0,333***

0,377**0,368**

0,371**(0,115)

(0,115)(0,115)

(0,094)(0,094)

(0,094)(0,171)

(0,171)(0,171)

Brancheneffekte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJahreseffekte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaQ

uartalseffekteN

einN

einN

einN

einN

einN

einN

einN

einN

ein

N1272

12721272

12721272

12721272

12721272

AnzahlFirm

en354

354354

354354

354R

20,095

0,1050,108

0,1320,135

0,1380,138

0,1410,143

F-Wert/

χ2-W

ert3,593

3,8553,833

149,39157,14

160,664,069

3,8953,792

Prob

>F/P

rob>

χ2

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,000a

Winsorisiert

aufdem1%

-Quantilw

ertan

beidenVerteilungsenden;

bStandardfehler

inK

lamm

er;c

Robuste

Standardfehlerin

Klam

mern

Branchen-,Jahres-und

Quartalseffekte

nichtaufgefuhrt;***

p<

0,01,**p

<0,05,*

p<

0,1

Page 17: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Anhang 269

Tabe

lleA

.14:

Reg

ress

ions

erge

bniss

ezu

mH

erde

nver

halte

nde

rFi

nanz

anal

yste

noh

nedi

eA

ufna

hme

von

Jahr

es-u

ndQ

uart

alse

ffekt

enA

bhan

gige

Vari

able

:Ana

lyst

Her

ding

aFi

xed-

Effe

cts-

Reg

ress

ionb

Ran

dom

-Effe

cts-

Reg

ress

ionb

OLS

mit

robu

sten

Stan

dard

fehl

ernc

Vari

able

nM

odel

l1a

Mod

ell2

aM

odel

l3a

Mod

ell1

bM

odel

l2b

Mod

ell3

bM

odel

l1c

Mod

ell2

cM

odel

l3c

Kon

stan

te2,

402*

*1,

807

2,01

6*4,

162*

**3,

593*

**3,

795*

**3,

465*

**2,

895*

**3,

063*

**(1

,188

)(1

,192

)(1

,195

)(0

,852

)(0

,860

)(0

,863

)(0

,652

)(0

,641

)(0

,642

)H

ypot

hetis

iert

enVa

riab

len

Kon

solid

ieru

ngsw

elle

1,05

8***

0,85

0***

1,04

2***

0,81

2***

0,97

6***

0,71

8***

(0,2

95)

(0,3

13)

(0,2

56)

(0,2

74)

(0,2

66)

(0,2

58)

Peak

jahr

0,95

3**

1,04

5**

1,17

1*(0

,486

)(0

,444

)(0

,694

)K

ontr

ollv

aria

blen

Ana

lyst

enan

zahl

-0,0

64**

-0,0

50*

-0,0

51**

-0,0

54**

-0,0

44**

-0,0

44**

-0,0

17-0

,017

-0,0

15(0

,026

)(0

,026

)(0

,026

)(0

,022

)(0

,022

)(0

,022

)(0

,017

)(0

,017

)(0

,017

)G

ewin

nvol

atili

tat

1,49

91,

387

1,45

40,

422

0,35

00,

388

0,06

50,

087

0,10

0(1

,270

)(1

,262

)(1

,260

)(0

,946

)(0

,941

)(0

,939

)(1

,151

)(1

,183

)(1

,173

)U

nter

nehm

ensg

roße

0,09

50,

110

0,08

4-0

,188

-0,1

84-0

,203

*-0

,187

*-0

,166

-0,1

80*

(0,1

72)

(0,1

71)

(0,1

72)

(0,1

24)

(0,1

23)

(0,1

23)

(0,1

03)

(0,1

01)

(0,1

01)

Verl

ust

0,78

5**

0,75

3**

0,69

0**

1,07

0***

1,03

5***

0,96

4***

1,01

4**

0,89

5**

0,92

9**

(0,3

34)

(0,3

32)

(0,3

33)

(0,2

91)

(0,2

89)

(0,2

90)

(0,4

60)

(0,4

46)

(0,4

41)

EP

S-A

nder

ung

1,01

6**

0,86

3*0,

908*

*0,

979*

*0,

821*

*0,

856*

*1,

203*

**1,

141*

**1,

051*

**(0

,444

)(0

,443

)(0

,443

)(0

,385

)(0

,384

)(0

,384

)(0

,358

)(0

,349

)(0

,341

)B

ranc

hene

ffekt

eJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

Jahr

eseff

ekte

Nei

nN

ein

Nei

nN

ein

Nei

nN

ein

Nei

nN

ein

Nei

nQ

uart

alse

ffekt

eN

ein

Nei

nN

ein

Nei

nN

ein

Nei

nN

ein

Nei

nN

ein

N12

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

72A

nzah

lFir

men

354

354

354

354

354

354

R2

0,02

50,

039

0,04

30,

067

0,08

00,

085

0,08

00,

092

0,09

7F-

Wer

t/χ

2 -Wer

t4,

732

6,14

25,

832

68,9

286

,15

91,9

47,

479

6,23

76,

127

Pro

b>F/

Pro

b>χ

20,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

aW

inso

risi

ert

aufd

em1%

-Qua

ntilw

ert

anbe

iden

Vert

eilu

ngse

nden

;bSt

anda

rdfe

hler

inK

lam

mer

;cR

obus

teSt

anda

rdfe

hler

inK

lam

mer

nB

ranc

hen-

,Jah

res-

und

Qua

rtal

seffe

kte

nich

tau

fgef

uhrt

;***

p<0,

01,*

*p<

0,05

,*p<

0,1

Page 18: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

270 AnhangTabelle

A.15:R

egressionsergebnissezum

Uberoptim

ismus

derFinanzanalysten

ohnedie

Aufnahm

evon

Jahres-undQ

uartalseffektenA

bhangigeVariable:A

nalystSurprise a

Fixed-Effects-R

egressionb

Random

-Effects-R

egressionb

OLS

mit

robustenStandardfehlern

c

VariablenM

odell1aM

odell2aM

odell3aM

odell1bM

odell2bM

odell3bM

odell1cM

odell2cM

odell3c

Konstante

-0,316-0,451

-0,4020,325*

0,2260,266

0,385***0,311**

0,346***(0,311)

(0,312)(0,313)

(0,189)(0,192)

(0,193)(0,144)

(0,139)(0,133)

Hypothetisierten

VariablenK

onsolidierungswelle

0,253***0,199**

0,177***0,128*

0,124*0,074

(0,077)(0,082)

(0,063)(0,067)

(0,064)(0,063)

Peakjahr0,244*

0,220**0,223*

(0,126)(0,112)

(0,130)K

ontrollvariablenA

nalystenanzahl-0,005

-0,002-0,002

-0,007-0,006

-0,006-0,008**

-0,008*-0,007*

(0,007)(0,007)

(0,007)(0,005)

(0,005)(0,005)

(0,004)(0,004)

(0,004)P

rognosestreuung0,183

0,2070,191

0,0750,093

0,082-0,007

0,004-0,012

(0,134)(0,134)

(0,134)(0,105)

(0,105)(0,105)

(0,102)(0,104)

(0,104)G

ewinnvolatilitat

0,1650,137

0,155-0,046

-0,055-0,049

-0,070-0,068

-0,064(0,330)

(0,328)(0,328)

(0,223)(0,223)

(0,223)(0,237)

(0,238)(0,238)

Unternehm

ensgroße0,060

0,0620,056

-0,010-0,009

-0,012-0,021

-0,018-0,021

(0,045)(0,045)

(0,045)(0,029)

(0,029)(0,029)

(0,019)(0,019)

(0,019)Verlust

0,438***0,429***

0,414***0,445***

0,437***0,423***

0,420***0,410***

0,395***(0,087)

(0,086)(0,087)

(0,072)(0,071)

(0,072)(0,100)

(0,099)(0,100)

EP

S-Anderung

0,225*0,190*

0,201*0,334***

0,308***0,313***

0,383**0,369**

0,374**(0,115)

(0,115)(0,115)

(0,094)(0,094)

(0,094)(0,174)

(0,177)(0,176)

Brancheneffekte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJahreseffekte

Nein

Nein

Nein

Nein

Nein

Nein

Nein

Nein

Nein

Quartalseffekte

Nein

Nein

Nein

Nein

Nein

Nein

Nein

Nein

Nein

N1272

12721272

12721272

12721272

12721272

AnzahlFirm

en354

354354

354354

354R

20,040

0,0510,055

0,1020,105

0,1080,105

0,1090,112

F-Wert/

χ2-W

ert6,292

7,0066,616

93,35101,33

105,255,907

5,7275,746

Prob

>F/P

rob>

χ2

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,000a

Winsorisiert

aufdem1%

-Quantilw

ertan

beidenVerteilungsenden;

bStandardfehler

inK

lamm

er;c

Robuste

Standardfehlerin

Klam

mern

Branchen-,Jahres-und

Quartalseffekte

nichtaufgefuhrt;***

p<

0,01,**p

<0,05,*

p<

0,1

Page 19: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Anhang 271

Tabe

lleA

.16:

Reg

ress

ions

erge

bniss

ezu

mH

erde

nver

halte

nde

rFi

nanz

anal

yste

noh

nedi

eA

ufna

hme

von

Bra

nche

n-,

Jahr

es-u

ndQ

uart

alse

ffekt

enA

bhan

gige

Vari

able

:Ana

lyst

Her

ding

aFi

xed-

Effe

cts-

Reg

ress

ionb

Ran

dom

-Effe

cts-

Reg

ress

ionb

OLS

mit

robu

sten

Stan

dard

fehl

ernc

Vari

able

nM

odel

l1a

Mod

ell2

aM

odel

l3a

Mod

ell1

bM

odel

l2b

Mod

ell3

bM

odel

l1c

Mod

ell2

cM

odel

l3c

Kon

stan

te2,

402*

*1,

807

2,01

6*4,

526*

**4,

112*

**4,

261*

**4,

230*

**3,

923*

**4,

071*

**(1

,188

)(1

,192

)(1

,195

)(0

,794

)(0

,797

)(0

,797

)(0

,599

)(0

,603

)(0

,599

)H

ypot

hetis

iert

enVa

riab

len

Kon

solid

ieru

ngsw

elle

1,05

8***

0,85

0***

1,00

1***

0,75

6***

0,66

5**

0,35

8(0

,295

)(0

,313

)(0

,254

)(0

,270

)(0

,272

)(0

,261

)Pe

akja

hr0,

953*

*1,

146*

**1,

527*

*(0

,486

)(0

,441

)(0

,730

)K

ontr

ollv

aria

blen

Ana

lyst

enan

zahl

-0,0

64**

-0,0

50*

-0,0

51**

-0,0

52**

-0,0

43*

-0,0

42*

-0,0

18-0

,018

-0,0

16(0

,026

)(0

,026

)(0

,026

)(0

,022

)(0

,022

)(0

,022

)(0

,015

)(0

,015

)(0

,015

)G

ewin

nvol

atili

tat

1,49

91,

387

1,45

40,

210

0,17

50,

216

-0,1

55-0

,120

-0,1

19(1

,270

)(1

,262

)(1

,260

)(0

,926

)(0

,921

)(0

,919

)(1

,105

)(1

,122

)(1

,108

)U

nter

nehm

ensg

roße

0,09

50,

110

0,08

4-0

,207

*-0

,206

*-0

,226

*-0

,225

**-0

,211

**-0

,232

**(0

,172

)(0

,171

)(0

,172

)(0

,122

)(0

,121

)(0

,121

)(0

,090

)(0

,091

)(0

,090

)Ve

rlus

t0,

785*

*0,

753*

*0,

690*

*1,

006*

**0,

976*

**0,

902*

**0,

857*

0,75

50,

803*

(0,3

34)

(0,3

32)

(0,3

33)

(0,2

84)

(0,2

83)

(0,2

84)

(0,4

68)

(0,4

59)

(0,4

51)

EP

S-A

nder

ung

1,01

6**

0,86

3*0,

908*

*0,

942*

*0,

782*

*0,

824*

*1,

000*

**0,

961*

**0,

844*

*(0

,444

)(0

,443

)(0

,443

)(0

,382

)(0

,382

)(0

,381

)(0

,361

)(0

,358

)(0

,349

)B

ranc

hene

ffekt

eN

ein

Nei

nN

ein

Nei

nN

ein

Nei

nN

ein

Nei

nN

ein

Jahr

eseff

ekte

Nei

nN

ein

Nei

nN

ein

Nei

nN

ein

Nei

nN

ein

Nei

nQ

uart

alse

ffekt

eN

ein

Nei

nN

ein

Nei

nN

ein

Nei

nN

ein

Nei

nN

ein

N12

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

7212

72A

nzah

lFir

men

354

354

354

354

354

354

R2

0,02

50,

039

0,04

30,

051

0,05

70,

064

0,05

20,

059

0,06

7F-

Wer

t/χ

2 -Wer

t4,

732

6,14

25,

832

54,4

370

,55

77,6

87,

881

7,02

26,

365

Pro

b>F/

Pro

b>χ

20,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

aW

inso

risi

ert

aufd

em1%

-Qua

ntilw

ert

anbe

iden

Vert

eilu

ngse

nden

;bSt

anda

rdfe

hler

inK

lam

mer

;cR

obus

teSt

anda

rdfe

hler

inK

lam

mer

nB

ranc

hen-

,Jah

res-

und

Qua

rtal

seffe

kte

nich

tau

fgef

uhrt

;***

p<0,

01,*

*p<

0,05

,*p<

0,1

Page 20: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

272 AnhangTabelle

A.17:R

egressionsergebnissezum

Uberoptim

ismus

derFinanzanalysten

ohnedie

Aufnahm

evon

Branchen-,

Jahres-undQ

uartalseffektenA

bhangigeVariable:A

nalystSurprise a

Fixed-Effects-R

egressionb

Random

-Effects-R

egressionb

OLS

mit

robustenStandardfehlern

c

VariablenM

odell1aM

odell2aM

odell3aM

odell1bM

odell2bM

odell3bM

odell1cM

odell2cM

odell3c

Konstante

-0,316-0,451

-0,4020,276

0,2000,224

0,319**0,256**

0,279**(0,311)

(0,312)(0,313)

(0,176)(0,178)

(0,178)(0,127)

(0,122)(0,117)

Hypothetisierten

VariablenK

onsolidierungswelle

0,253***0,199**

0,185***0,137**

0,136**0,089

(0,077)(0,082)

(0,061)(0,066)

(0,063)(0,064)

Peakjahr0,244*

0,227**0,236*

(0,126)(0,110)

(0,134)K

ontrollvariablenA

nalystenanzahl-0,005

-0,002-0,002

-0,006-0,004

-0,004-0,006*

-0,006*-0,005*

(0,007)(0,007)

(0,007)(0,005)

(0,005)(0,005)

(0,003)(0,003)

(0,003)P

rognosestreuung0,183

0,2070,191

0,0890,097

0,0910,023

0,0190,015

(0,134)(0,134)

(0,134)(0,101)

(0,100)(0,100)

(0,098)(0,099)

(0,101)G

ewinnvolatilitat

0,1650,137

0,155-0,090

-0,091-0,084

-0,045-0,037

-0,037(0,330)

(0,328)(0,328)

(0,216)(0,216)

(0,216)(0,247)

(0,249)(0,247)

Unternehm

ensgroße0,060

0,0620,056

-0,016-0,015

-0,018-0,023

-0,020-0,023

(0,045)(0,045)

(0,045)(0,028)

(0,028)(0,028)

(0,019)(0,019)

(0,018)Verlust

0,438***0,429***

0,414***0,432***

0,425***0,411***

0,412***0,405***

0,387***(0,087)

(0,086)(0,087)

(0,069)(0,069)

(0,069)(0,089)

(0,088)(0,089)

EP

S-Anderung

0,225*0,190*

0,201*0,351***

0,320***0,327***

0,424**0,403**

0,410**(0,115)

(0,115)(0,115)

(0,093)(0,093)

(0,093)(0,172)

(0,175)(0,174)

Brancheneffekte

Nein

Nein

Nein

Nein

Nein

Nein

Nein

Nein

Nein

JahreseffekteN

einN

einN

einN

einN

einN

einN

einN

einN

einQ

uartalseffekteN

einN

einN

einN

einN

einN

einN

einN

einN

ein

N1272

12721272

12721272

12721272

12721272

AnzahlFirm

en354

354354

354354

354R

20,040

0,0510,055

0,0930,096

0,0990,094

0,0990,102

F-Wert/

χ2-W

ert6,292

7,0066,616

85,4994,71

99,0212,77

11,169,948

Prob

>F/P

rob>

χ2

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,000a

Winsorisiert

aufdem1%

-Quantilw

ertan

beidenVerteilungsenden;

bStandardfehler

inK

lamm

er;c

Robuste

Standardfehlerin

Klam

mern

Branchen-,Jahres-und

Quartalseffekte

nichtaufgefuhrt;***

p<

0,01,**p

<0,05,*

p<

0,1

Page 21: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Anhang 273

Tabe

lleA

.18:

Reg

ress

ions

erge

bniss

ezu

mH

erde

nver

halte

nde

rFi

nanz

anal

yste

nm

it2-

jahr

igen

Prog

nose

horiz

ont

Abh

angi

geVa

riab

le:A

naly

stH

erdi

nga

Fixe

d-E

ffect

s-R

egre

ssio

nbR

ando

m-E

ffect

s-R

egre

ssio

nbO

LSm

itro

bust

enSt

anda

rdfe

hler

nc

Vari

able

nM

odel

l1a

Mod

ell2

aM

odel

l3a

Mod

ell1

bM

odel

l2b

Mod

ell3

bM

odel

l1c

Mod

ell2

cM

odel

l3c

Kon

stan

te1,

966

2,10

33,

065

4,14

6**

3,86

5*4,

340*

*4,

387*

**4,

014*

*4,

467*

**(3

,051

)(3

,045

)(3

,007

)(2

,011

)(2

,011

)(2

,001

)(1

,635

)(1

,620

)(1

,612

)H

ypot

hetis

iert

enVa

riab

len

Kon

solid

ieru

ngsw

elle

1,67

6**

0,80

61,

365*

*0,

503

1,25

1*0,

357

(0,7

75)

(0,7

83)

(0,5

90)

(0,6

09)

(0,6

38)

(0,6

20)

Peak

jahr

4,49

6***

3,89

9***

3,90

4***

(0,8

86)

(0,7

63)

(1,2

67)

Kon

trol

lvar

iabl

enA

naly

sten

anza

hl-0

,045

-0,0

52-0

,066

-0,0

25-0

,032

-0,0

35-0

,001

-0,0

09-0

,008

(0,0

50)

(0,0

50)

(0,0

49)

(0,0

37)

(0,0

37)

(0,0

37)

(0,0

28)

(0,0

29)

(0,0

29)

Gew

innv

olat

ilita

t-0

,707

-0,6

80-0

,568

-0,2

52-0

,268

-0,4

43-0

,445

-0,4

75-0

,662

(2,4

22)

(2,4

17)

(2,3

82)

(0,9

75)

(0,9

75)

(0,9

73)

(0,6

16)

(0,6

22)

(0,6

30)

Unt

erne

hmen

sgro

ße0,

282

0,32

30,

145

-0,2

06-0

,165

-0,2

12-0

,259

-0,2

17-0

,254

(0,3

69)

(0,3

69)

(0,3

65)

(0,1

84)

(0,1

85)

(0,1

85)

(0,1

85)

(0,1

83)

(0,1

83)

Verl

ust

2,84

8***

2,81

5***

2,56

4***

2,51

4***

2,51

9***

2,27

5***

2,40

6***

2,41

3***

2,12

0***

(0,6

01)

(0,6

00)

(0,5

94)

(0,4

78)

(0,4

77)

(0,4

76)

(0,5

61)

(0,5

61)

(0,5

45)

EP

S-A

nder

ung

2,41

9***

2,38

1***

2,44

7***

2,50

8***

2,45

9***

2,44

2***

2,50

0***

2,45

6***

2,41

6***

(0,8

09)

(0,8

07)

(0,7

96)

(0,6

45)

(0,6

44)

(0,6

38)

(0,9

22)

(0,9

16)

(0,8

52)

Bra

nche

neffe

kte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

hres

effek

teJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

Qua

rtal

seffe

kte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

Ja

N11

9411

9411

9411

9411

9411

9411

9411

9411

94A

nzah

lFir

men

332

332

332

332

332

332

R2

0,17

20,

177

0,20

10,

198

0,20

10,

219

0,20

30,

206

0,22

4F-

Wer

t/χ

2 -Wer

t6,

432

6,39

67,

247

256,

726

2,9

293,

785,

802

5,60

35,

804

Pro

b>F/

Pro

b>χ

20,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

aW

inso

risi

ert

aufd

em1%

-Qua

ntilw

ert

anbe

iden

Vert

eilu

ngse

nden

;bSt

anda

rdfe

hler

inK

lam

mer

;cR

obus

teSt

anda

rdfe

hler

inK

lam

mer

nB

ranc

hen-

,Jah

res-

und

Qua

rtal

seffe

kte

nich

tau

fgef

uhrt

;***

p<0,

01,*

*p<

0,05

,*p<

0,1

Page 22: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

274 AnhangTabelle

A.19:R

egressionsergebnissezum

Uberoptim

ismus

derFinanzanalysten

mit

2-jahrigenPrognosehorizont

Abhangige

Variable:Analyst

Surprise aFixed-E

ffects-Regression

bR

andom-E

ffects-Regression

bO

LSm

itrobusten

Standardfehlernc

VariablenM

odell1aM

odell2aM

odell3aM

odell1bM

odell2bM

odell3bM

odell1cM

odell2cM

odell3c

Konstante

1,1451,301

1,6631,065

0,9131,081

1,118*0,954

1,121*(1,249)

(1,241)(1,227)

(0,821)(0,822)

(0,819)(0,669)

(0,665)(0,669)

Hypothetisierten

VariablenK

onsolidierungswelle

1,167***0,828***

0,620**0,302

0,524**0,200

(0,316)(0,320)

(0,244)(0,253)

(0,204)(0,199)

Peakjahr1,739***

1,438***1,398**

(0,359)(0,319)

(0,621)K

ontrollvariablenA

nalystenanzahl0,030

0,0260,020

0,0030,000

0,000-0,009

-0,013-0,013

(0,020)(0,020)

(0,020)(0,015)

(0,015)(0,015)

(0,012)(0,012)

(0,012)P

rognosestreuung1,659***

1,806***1,781***

0,739***0,816***

0,810***0,583

0,6410,612

(0,337)(0,337)

(0,332)(0,243)

(0,244)(0,243)

(0,414)(0,421)

(0,417)G

ewinnvolatilitat

-2,273**-2,289**

-2,240**-0,628

-0,641-0,714*

-0,582**-0,595**

-0,662**(0,989)

(0,981)(0,968)

(0,389)(0,390)

(0,390)(0,247)

(0,248)(0,260)

Unternehm

ensgroße-0,184

-0,169-0,236

-0,080-0,063

-0,080-0,073

-0,058-0,070

(0,154)(0,153)

(0,151)(0,074)

(0,074)(0,075)

(0,070)(0,070)

(0,070)Verlust

1,861***1,829***

1,733***1,575***

1,573***1,489***

1,455***1,449***

1,348***(0,246)

(0,244)(0,241)

(0,201)(0,200)

(0,200)(0,309)

(0,306)(0,288)

EP

S-Anderung

0,899***0,878***

0,903***1,116***

1,099***1,088***

1,148*1,135*

1,118*(0,329)

(0,327)(0,323)

(0,268)(0,267)

(0,265)(0,605)

(0,611)(0,610)

Brancheneffekte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJahreseffekte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaQ

uartalseffekteJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

N1194

11941194

11941194

11941194

11941194

AnzahlFirm

en332

332332

332332

332R

20,242

0,2540,274

0,2210,224

0,2360,224

0,2280,240

F-Wert/

χ2-W

ert9,490

9,77210,48

313,38321,2

3473,376

3,3823,321

Prob

>F/P

rob>

χ2

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,000a

Winsorisiert

aufdem1%

-Quantilw

ertan

beidenVerteilungsenden;

bStandardfehler

inK

lamm

er;c

Robuste

Standardfehlerin

Klam

mern

Branchen-,Jahres-und

Quartalseffekte

nichtaufgefuhrt;***

p<

0,01,**p

<0,05,*

p<

0,1

Page 23: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Anhang 275

Tabe

lleA

.20:

Reg

ress

ions

erge

bniss

ezu

mH

erde

nver

halte

nde

rFi

nanz

anal

yste

nm

it2-

jahr

igen

Prog

nose

horiz

ont

und

Win

soris

ieru

ngau

f5%

-Qua

ntil

Abh

angi

geVa

riab

le:A

naly

stH

erdi

nga

Fixe

d-E

ffect

s-R

egre

ssio

nbR

ando

m-E

ffect

s-R

egre

ssio

nbO

LSm

itro

bust

enSt

anda

rdfe

hler

nc

Vari

able

nM

odel

l1a

Mod

ell2

aM

odel

l3a

Mod

ell1

bM

odel

l2b

Mod

ell3

bM

odel

l1c

Mod

ell2

cM

odel

l3c

Kon

stan

te4,

322*

*4,

427*

*4,

978*

*4,

328*

**4,

096*

**4,

344*

**4,

373*

**4,

070*

**4,

304*

**(2

,175

)(2

,170

)(2

,154

)(1

,403

)(1

,404

)(1

,402

)(1

,301

)(1

,297

)(1

,296

)H

ypot

hetis

iert

enVa

riab

len

Kon

solid

ieru

ngsw

elle

1,28

2**

0,78

31,

060*

*0,

608

1,01

8**

0,55

6(0

,552

)(0

,561

)(0

,413

)(0

,429

)(0

,463

)(0

,473

)Pe

akja

hr2,

578*

**2,

025*

**2,

019*

**(0

,635

)(0

,542

)(0

,755

)K

ontr

ollv

aria

blen

Ana

lyst

enan

zahl

-0,0

23-0

,029

-0,0

36-0

,007

-0,0

13-0

,015

0,01

10,

004

0,00

5(0

,035

)(0

,035

)(0

,035

)(0

,026

)(0

,026

)(0

,026

)(0

,022

)(0

,022

)(0

,022

)G

ewin

nvol

atili

tat

0,23

40,

254

0,31

80,

252

0,23

80,

148

0,11

10,

087

-0,0

10(1

,727

)(1

,722

)(1

,707

)(0

,672

)(0

,671

)(0

,672

)(0

,469

)(0

,480

)(0

,484

)U

nter

nehm

ensg

roße

-0,1

54-0

,122

-0,2

24-0

,225

*-0

,192

-0,2

17*

-0,2

34*

-0,2

00-0

,219

*(0

,263

)(0

,263

)(0

,261

)(0

,127

)(0

,128

)(0

,128

)(0

,130

)(0

,128

)(0

,128

)Ve

rlus

t2,

177*

**2,

151*

**2,

007*

**1,

747*

**1,

752*

**1,

625*

**1,

648*

**1,

653*

**1,

502*

**(0

,429

)(0

,428

)(0

,425

)(0

,336

)(0

,336

)(0

,336

)(0

,375

)(0

,374

)(0

,375

)E

PS-

And

erun

g2,

190*

**2,

161*

**2,

198*

**2,

340*

**2,

302*

**2,

289*

**2,

362*

**2,

326*

**2,

306*

**(0

,577

)(0

,575

)(0

,570

)(0

,454

)(0

,453

)(0

,451

)(0

,625

)(0

,620

)(0

,582

)B

ranc

hene

ffekt

eJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

Jahr

eseff

ekte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaQ

uart

alse

ffekt

eJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

N11

9411

9411

9411

9411

9411

9411

9411

9411

94A

nzah

lFir

men

332

332

332

332

332

332

R2

0,19

90,

204

0,22

00,

224

0,22

90,

238

0,22

80,

232

0,24

2F-

Wer

t/χ

2 -Wer

t7,

679

7,63

68,

078

305,

1231

2,96

329,

547,

386

7,31

27,

516

Pro

b>F/

Pro

b>χ

20,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

0,00

00,

000

aW

inso

risi

ert

aufd

em5%

-Qua

ntilw

ert

anbe

iden

Vert

eilu

ngse

nden

;bSt

anda

rdfe

hler

inK

lam

mer

;cR

obus

teSt

anda

rdfe

hler

inK

lam

mer

nB

ranc

hen-

,Jah

res-

und

Qua

rtal

seffe

kte

nich

tau

fgef

uhrt

;***

p<0,

01,*

*p<

0,05

,*p<

0,1

Page 24: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

276 AnhangTabelle

A.21:R

egressionsergebnissezum

Uberoptim

ismus

derFinanzanalysten

mit

2-jahrigenPrognosehorizont

undW

insorisierungauf5%

-Quantil

Abhangige

Variable:Analyst

Surprise aFixed-E

ffects-Regression

bR

andom-E

ffects-Regression

bO

LSm

itrobusten

Standardfehlernc

VariablenM

odell1aM

odell2aM

odell3aM

odell1bM

odell2bM

odell3bM

odell1cM

odell2cM

odell3c

Konstante

0,2080,287

0,4130,759**

0,688**0,744**

0,889***0,805**

0,859***(0,467)

(0,461)(0,457)

(0,319)(0,319)

(0,318)(0,332)

(0,331)(0,330)

Hypothetisierten

VariablenK

onsolidierungswelle

0,584***0,466***

0,322***0,216**

0,269***0,165*

(0,117)(0,119)

(0,094)(0,097)

(0,095)(0,096)

Peakjahr0,609***

0,493***0,450**

(0,134)(0,120)

(0,205)K

ontrollvariablenA

nalystenanzahl0,010

0,0070,006

0,0040,003

0,0030,000

-0,002-0,002

(0,008)(0,007)

(0,007)(0,006)

(0,006)(0,006)

(0,006)(0,006)

(0,006)P

rognosestreuung0,489***

0,563***0,555***

0,247***0,285***

0,283***0,201

0,231*0,221*

(0,126)(0,125)

(0,124)(0,094)

(0,095)(0,094)

(0,129)(0,132)

(0,129)G

ewinnvolatilitat

-0,322-0,330

-0,313-0,222

-0,226-0,248

-0,232-0,239

-0,260*(0,370)

(0,365)(0,361)

(0,156)(0,156)

(0,156)(0,145)

(0,147)(0,150)

Unternehm

ensgroße0,016

0,023-0,000

-0,037-0,029

-0,034-0,049*

-0,041-0,045

(0,057)(0,057)

(0,056)(0,030)

(0,030)(0,030)

(0,028)(0,029)

(0,028)Verlust

1,083***1,066***

1,033***0,991***

0,990***0,961***

0,900***0,897***

0,865***(0,092)

(0,091)(0,090)

(0,077)(0,076)

(0,076)(0,115)

(0,114)(0,115)

EP

S-Anderung

0,635***0,624***

0,633***0,672***

0,663***0,660***

0,706***0,699***

0,694***(0,123)

(0,122)(0,120)

(0,102)(0,102)

(0,101)(0,181)

(0,183)(0,179)

Brancheneffekte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJahreseffekte

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaQ

uartalseffekteJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

JaJa

N1194

11941194

11941194

11941194

11941194

AnzahlFirm

en332

332332

332332

332R

20,366

0,3840,399

0,3710,375

0,3820,377

0,3820,389

F-Wert/

χ2-W

ert17,20

17,9418,44

624,04641,11

666,669,445

9,5479,442

Prob

>F/P

rob>

χ2

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,0000,000

0,000a

Winsorisiert

aufdem5%

-Quantilw

ertan

beidenVerteilungsenden;

bStandardfehler

inK

lamm

er;c

Robuste

Standardfehlerin

Klam

mern

Branchen-,Jahres-und

Quartalseffekte

nichtaufgefuhrt;***

p<

0,01,**p

<0,05,*

p<

0,1

Page 25: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Anhang 277

Tabelle A.22: Regressionsergebnisse zum Herdenverhalten der Finanzanalystenmit der Tobit-Methode

Abhangige Variable: Analyst Herdinga Tobit-Regression mit Random-Effectsb

Variablen Modell 1a Modell 2a Modell 3a

Konstante 5,179*** 5,064*** 5,165***(1,410) (1,410) (1,407)

Hypothetisierten VariablenKonsolidierungswelle 0,841** 0,572

(0,356) (0,369)Peakjahr 1,242***

(0,466)Kontrollvariablen

Analystenanzahl -0,022 -0,025 -0,025(0,021) (0,021) (0,021)

Gewinnvolatilitat -0,233 -0,230 -0,173(0,873) (0,871) (0,869)

Unternehmensgroße -0,293*** -0,278** -0,287***(0,111) (0,111) (0,111)

Verlust 1,036*** 1,035*** 0,963***(0,285) (0,284) (0,285)

EPS-Anderung 0,936** 0,888** 0,907**(0,372) (0,372) (0,371)

Brancheneffekte Ja Ja JaJahreseffekte Ja Ja JaQuartalseffekte Ja Ja Ja

N 1272 1272 1272Anzahl Firmen 354 354 354F-Wert/χ2-Wert 179,67 185,90 193,93Prob>F/Prob>χ2 0,000 0,000 0,000

a Winsorisiert auf dem 1%-Quantilwert an beiden Verteilungsenden; b Standardfehler in KlammerBranchen-, Jahres- und Quartalseffekte nicht aufgefuhrt; *** p<0,01, ** p<0,05, * p<0,1

Page 26: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Literaturverzeichnis

Abarbanell, Jeffry S. und Bernard, Victor L. (1992). Tests of analysts’ overreacti-on/underreaction to earnings information as an explanation for anomalous stockprice behavior. The Journal of Finance, 47(3):1181–1207.

Aboody, David, Kasznik, Ron, und Williams, Michael (2000). Purchase versuspooling in stock-for-stock acquisitions: Why do firms care? Journal of Accountingand Economics, 29(3):261–286.

Achleitner, Ann-Kristin (1999). Handbuch Investment-Banking. Gabler, Wiesba-den.

Ackert, Lucy F. und Athanassakos, George (1997). Prior uncertainty, analyst bias,and subsequent abnormal returns. Journal of Financial Research, 20(2):263–273.

Ackstaller, Eva (2005). Rationales Herdenverhalten im Licht der Marktversagens-theorie. Lang, Frankfurt a.M.

Agrawal, Anup und Chen, Mark A. (2008). Do analyst conflicts matter? Evidencefrom stock recommendations. Journal of Law and Economics, 51(3):503–537.

Ahern, Kenneth R. und Harford, Jarrad (2014). The importance of industry linksin merger waves. The Journal of Finance, 69(2):527–576.

Akhigbe, Aigbe und Martin, Anna D. (2000). Information-signaling and compe-titive effects of foreign acquisitions in the US. Journal of Banking & Finance,24(8):1307–1321.

Alberts, William W. (1966). The profitability of growth by merger. In: Alberts,William W. (Hrsg.), The corporate merger. University of Chicago Press, Chicago,IL, 235–287.

Alchian, Armen A. (1969). Corporate management and property rights. In: Manne,Henry G. (Hrsg.), Economic policy and the regulation of corporate securities.American Enterprise Institute, Washington D.C., 337–360.

Alexandridis, George, Mavrovitis, Christos F., und Travlos, Nickolaos G. (2012).How have M&As changed? Evidence from the sixth merger wave. The EuropeanJournal of Finance, 18(8):663–688.

279© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016S. Schmal, Konsolidierungswellen und Prognoseverhalten von Finanzanalysten,DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-14582-8

Page 27: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

280 Literaturverzeichnis

Almazan, Andres und Molina, Carlos A. (2005). Intra-industry capital structuredispersion. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 14(2):263–297.

Amemiya, Takeshi (1973). Regression analysis when the dependent variable istruncated normal. Econometrica, 41(6):997–1016.

Amihud, Yakov und Lev, Baruch (1981). Risk reduction as a managerial motivefor conglomerate mergers. The Bell Journal of Economics, 12(2):605–617.

Amit, Raphael und Wernerfelt, Birger (1990). Why do firms reduce business risk?The Academy of Management Journal, 33(3):520–533.

Anand, Jaideep, Capron, Laurence, und Mitchell, Will (2005). Using acquisitions toaccess multinational diversity: Thinking beyond the domestic versus cross-borderM&A comparison. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(2):191–224.

Anderson, Valerie (1991). Research Methods in Human Resource Management.Chartered Institute of Personnel & Development, London, UK.

Andrade, Gregor, Mitchell, Mark, und Stafford, Erik (2001). New evidence andperspectives on mergers. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2):103–120.

Andrade, Gregor und Stafford, Erik (2004). Investigating the economic role ofmergers. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(1):1–36.

Andres, Peter und Spiwoks, Markus (2001). Prognosegutemaße - State of theArt der statistischen Ex-post-Beurteilung von Prognosen. Working paper, Sofia-Studien zur Insitutionenanalyse Nr. 00-1, Darmstadt.

Angrist, Joshua D. und Pischke, Jorn-Steffen (2009). Mostly harmless econome-trics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Ansoff, Harry Igor (1966). Management-Strategie. Verlag Moderne Industrie,Munchen.

Arnold, John und Moizer, Peter (1984). A survey of the methods used by UKinvestment analysts to appraise investments in ordinary shares. Accounting &Business Research, 14(55):195–208.

Arya, Anil, Glover, Jonathan, Mittendorf, Brian, und Narayanamoorthy, Gana-pathi (2005). Unintended consequences of regulating disclosures: The case ofregulation fair disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(3):243–252.

Asquith, Paul, Mikhail, Michael B., und Au, Andrea S. (2005). Information contentof equity analyst reports. Journal of Financial Economics, 75(2):245–282.

Page 28: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Literaturverzeichnis 281

Auerbach, Alan J. und Kotlikoff, Laurence J. (1998). Macroeconomics: An inte-grated approach. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Auerbach, Alan J. und Reishus, David (1986). Taxes and the merger decision: Anempirical analysis. Working Paper 1855, NBER, Cambridge, MA.

Auerbach, Alan J. und Reishus, David (1988). The effects of taxation on themerger decision. In: Auerbach, Alan J. (Hrsg.), Corporate Takeovers: Causesand Consequences. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 157–190.

Avery, Christopher, Chevalier, Judith A., und Schaefer, Scott (1998). Why domanagers undertake acquisitions? An analysis of internal and external awardsfor acquisitiveness. Journal of Law, Economics and Organizations, 14(1):24–43.

Bamberger, Burkhard (1994). Der Erfolg von Unternehmensakquisitionen inDeutschland: Eine theoretische und empirische Untersuchung. Eul Verlag, Loh-mar.

Banerjee, Abhijit V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. The QuarterlyJournal of Economics, 107(3):797–817.

Barber, Brad, Lehavy, Reuven, McNichols, Maureen, und Trueman, Brett (2001).Can investors profit from the prophets? Security analyst recommendations andstock returns. The Journal of Finance, 56(2):531–563.

Barber, Brad M. und Loeffler, Douglas (1993). The ”Dartboard” column: Second-hand information and price pressure. Journal of Financial and QuantitativeAnalysis, 28(2):273–284.

Barberis, Nicholas und Thaler, Richard (2003). A survey of behavioral finance. In:Constantinides, George M., Harris, Milton, und M., Stulz Rene (Hrsg.), Handbookof the Economics of Finance. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1054–1123.

Barker, Richard G. (1998). The market for information – Evidence from financedirectors, analysts and fund managers. Accounting & Business Research, 29(1):3–20.

Barnes, Beau Grant, L. Harp, Nancy, und Oler, Derek (2014). Evaluating the SDCmergers and acquisitions database. Financial Review, 49(4):793–822.

Barney, Jay (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journalof Management, 17(1):99–120.

Barron, Orie E., Kim, Oliver, Lim, Steve C., und Stevens, Douglas E. (1998). Usinganalysts’ forecasts to measure properties of analysts’ information environment.The Accounting Review, 73(4):421–433.

Page 29: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

282 Literaturverzeichnis

Barron, Orie E. und Stuerke, Pamela S. (1998). Dispersion in analysts’ earningsforecasts as a measure of uncertainty. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance,13(3):245–270.

Barrot, Christian (2006). Prognosegutemaße. In: Albers, S. und Klapper, D.(Hrsg.), Methodik der empirischen Forschung. Gabler, Wiesbaden, 431–446.

Beaver, William, Cornell, Bradford, Landsman, Wayne R., und Stubben, Ste-phen R. (2008). The impact of analysts’ forecast errors and forecast revisions onstock prices. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 35(5-6):709–740.

Becker, Thomas E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of varia-bles in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations.Organizational Research Methods, 8(3):274–289.

Beckers, Stan, Steliaros, Michael, und Thomson, Alexander (2004). Bias in Euro-pean analysts’ earnings forecasts. Financial Analysts Journal, 60(2):74–85.

Beitel, Patrick (2002). Akquisitionen und Zusammenschlusse europaischer Banken:Wertsteigerung durch M&A-Transaktionen. Dt. Univ.-Verlag, Wiesbaden.

Beltz, Jess und Jennings, Robert (1997). ”Wall street week with Louis Rukhey-ser” recommendations: Trading activity and performance. Review of FinancialEconomics, 6(1):15–27.

Benner, Mary J. (2010). Securities analysts and incumbent response to radicaltechnological change: Evidence from digital photography and internet telephony.Organization Science, 21(1):42–62.

Benner, Mary J. und Ranganathan, Ram (2012). Offsetting illegitimacy? Howpressures from securities analysts iinfluence incumbents in the face of new tech-nologies. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1):213–233.

Benzing, Cynthia (1991). The determinants of aggregate-merger activity – Beforeand after Celler-Kefauver. 6(1):61–72.

Berger, Allen N., Demsetz, Rebecca S., und Strahan, Philip E. (1999). The consoli-dation of the financial services industry: Causes, consequences, and implicationsfor the future. Journal of Banking & Finance, 23(2–4):135–194.

Berger, Philip G. und Ofek, Eli (1995). Diversification’s effect on firm value. Jour-nal of Financial Economics, 37(1):39–65.

Bessler, Wolfgang und Stanzel, Matthias (2009). Conflicts of interest and researchquality of affiliated analysts in the German universal banking system: Evidencefrom IPO underwriting. European Financial Management, 15(4):757–786.

Page 30: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Literaturverzeichnis 283

Bharadwaj, Anu und Shivdasani, Anil (2003). Valuation effects of bank financingin acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 67(1):113–148.

Biddle, Gary C. und Seow, Gim S. (1991). The estimation and determinants ofassociations between returns and earnings: Evidence from cross-industry compa-risons. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 6(2):183–232.

Bikhchandani, Sushil, Hirshleifer, David, und Welch, Ivo (1992). A theory of fads,fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Po-litical Economy, 100(5):992–1026.

Bikhchandani, Sushil und Sharma, Sunil (2001). Herd behavior in financial mar-kets: A review. IMF Staff Papers, 47(3):279–310.

Bollinger, Christopher R. und Chandra, Amitabh (2005). Iatrogenic specificationerror: A cautionary tale of cleaning data. Journal of Labor Economics, 23(2):235–257.

Boni, Leslie und Womack, Kent L. (2006). Analysts, industries, and price momen-tum. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41(1):85–109.

Boubakri, Narjess, Dionne, Georges, und Triki, Thouraya (2008). Consolidationand value creation in the insurance industry: The role of governance. Journal ofBanking & Finance, 32(1):56–68.

Bouwman, Christa H., Fuller, Kathleen, und Nain, Amrita S. (2009). Marketvaluation and acquisition quality: Empirical evidence. The Review of FinancialStudies, 22(2):633–679.

Bouwman, Marinus J., Frishkoff, Patricia A., und Frishkoff, Paul (1987). How dofinancial analysts make decisions? A process model of the investment screeningdecision. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(1):1–29.

Boyt, Tom und Harvey, Michael (1997). Classification of industrial services: Amodel with strategic implications. Industrial Marketing Management, 26(4):291–300.

Bradley, Daniel J., Jordan, Bradford D., und Ritter, Jay R. (2008). Analyst beha-vior following IPOs: The ”Bubble Period” evidence. Review of Financial Studies,21(1):101–133.

Bradley, Michael, Desai, Anand, und Kim, E. Han (1988). Synergistic gains fromcorporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target andacquiring firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 21(1):3–40.

Page 31: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

284 Literaturverzeichnis

Bradshaw, Mark T., Richardson, Scott A., und Sloan, Richard G. (2003). Pumpand dump: An empirical analysis of the relation between corporate financingactivities and sell-side analyst research. Working paper, University of MichiganBusiness School, Ann Arbor, MI.

Bradshaw, Mark T., Richardson, Scott A., und Sloan, Richard G. (2006). The rela-tion between corporate financing activities, analysts’ forecasts and stock returns.Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1–2):53–85.

Brainard, William C. und Tobin, James (1968). Pitfalls in financial model building.The American Economic Review, 58(2):99–122.

Brancato, Carolyn Kay (1997). Institutional investors and corporate governance:Best practices for increasing corporate values. Irwin, Chicago, IL.

Brealey, Richard A. und Myers, Stewart C. (2003). Principles of corporate finance.McGraw-Hill, New York.

Brealey, Richard A., Myers, Stewart C., und Allen, Franklin (2009). Principles ofcorporate finance. McGraw-Hill Irwin, Boston, MA.

Brealey, Richard A., Myers, Stewart C., und Marcus, Alan J. (2008). Principles ofcorporate finance. McGraw-Hill Irwin, Boston, MA.

Brennan, Michael J. (1991). A perspective on accounting and stock prices. TheAccounting Review, 66(1):67–79.

Breusch, T. S. und Pagan, A. R. (1979). A simple test for heteroscedasticity andrandom coefficient variation. Econometrica, 47(5):1287–1294.

Brockman, Christopher M. und Brooks, Robert (1998). The CFA charter: Addingvalue to the market. Financial Analysts Journal, 54(6):81–85.

Brown, Lawrence D. (1996). Analyst forecasting errors and their implicationsfor security analysis: An alternative perspective. Financial Analysts Journal,52(1):40–47.

Brown, Lawrence D. (1997). Analyst forecasting errors: Additional evidence. Fi-nancial Analysts Journal, 53(6):81–88.

Brown, Lawrence D. (1998). Managerial behavior and the bias in analysts’ earningsforecasts. Working paper, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.

Brown, Lawrence D. (2001). A temporal analysis of earnings surprises: Profitsversus losses. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(2):221–241.

Bruner, Robert F. (2002). Does M&A pay? a survey of evidence for the decision-maker. Journal of Applied Finance, 12(1):48.

Page 32: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Literaturverzeichnis 285

Bryan, Stephen, Hwang, Lee, und Lilien, Steven (2000). CEO stock based compen-sation: An empirical analysis of incentive intensity, relative mix, and economicdeterminants. The Journal of Business, 73(4):661–693.

Buhner, Rolf (1990). Erfolg von Unternehmenszusammenschlussen in der Bundes-republik Deutschland. Poeschel, Stuttgart.

Butler, Kirt C. und Lang, Larry H. P. (1991). The forecast accuracy of individualanalysts: Evidence of systematic optimism and pessimism. Journal of AccountingResearch, 29(1):150–156.

Byrd, John, Parrino, Robert, und Pritsch, Gunnar (1998). Stockholder-managerconflicts and firm value. Financial Analysts Journal, 54(3):14–30.

Calomiris, Charles W. (1999). Gauging the efficiency of bank consolidation duringa merger wave. Journal of Banking & Finance, 23(2–4):615–621.

Calvo, Guillermo A. und Wellisz, Stanislaw (1978). Supervision, loss of control,and the optimum size of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 86(5):943–952.

Capstaff, John, Paudyal, Krishna, und Rees, William (1999). The relative forecastaccuracy of UK brokers. Accounting and Business Research, 30(1):3–16.

Capstaff, John, Paudyal, Krishna, und Rees, William (2001). A comparative ana-lysis of earnings forecasts in Europe. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,28(5–6):531–562.

Carow, Kenneth, Heron, Randall, und Saxton, Todd (2004). Do early birds get thereturns? An empirical investigation of early-mover advantages in acquisitions.Strategic Management Journal, 25(6):563–585.

Caves, Richard E. (1991). Corporate mergers in international economic integra-tion. In: Giovannini, Alberto und Mayer, Colin (Hrsg.), European FinancialIntegration. Centre for Economic Policy Research, Cambridge, UK, 136–171.

Chan, Kam C., Gup, Benton E., und Pan, Ming-Shiun (1997). International stockmarket efficiency and integration: A study of eighteen nations. Journal of Busi-ness Finance & Accounting, 24(6):803–813.

Chan, Louis K. C., Lakonishok, Josef, und Swaminathan, Bhaskaran (2007). Indus-try classifications and return comovement. Financial Analysts Journal, 63(6):56–70.

Chang, Saeyoung (1998). Takeovers of privately held targets, methods of payment,and bidder returns. The Journal of Finance, 53(2):773–784.

Page 33: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

286 Literaturverzeichnis

Chang, Shao-Chi, Chen, Sheng-Syan, Hsing, Ailing, und Huang, Chia (2007). In-vestment opportunities, free cash flow, and stock valuation effects of secured debtofferings. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 28(2):123–145.

Cheng, Yingmei, Liu, Mark H., und Qian, Jun (2006). Buy-side analysts, sell-sideanalysts, and investment decisions of money managers. Journal of Financial andQuantitative Analysis, 41(01):51–83.

Chevalier, Judith und Ellison, Glenn (1999). Career concerns of mutual fund ma-nagers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2):389–432.

Child, John, Faulkner, David, und Pitkethly, Robert (2001). The management ofinternational acquisitions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

Christiansen, Lone (2008). Do technology shocks lead to productivity slowdowns?Evidence from patent data. Working Paper 08/24, IMF, Washington D.C.

Clark, Gordon, Thrift, Nigel, und Tickell, Adam (2004). Performing finance: Theindustry, the media and its image. Review of International Political Economy,11(2):289–310.

Clarke, Richard N. (1989). SICs as delineators of economic markets. The Journalof Business, 62(1):17–31.

Clement, Michael B. (1999). Analyst forecast accuracy: Do ability, resources, andportfolio complexity matter? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 27(3):285–303.

Clement, Michael B. und Tse, Senyo Y. (2003). Do investors respond to analysts’forecast revisions as if forecast accuracy is all that matters? The AccountingReview, 78(1):227–249.

Clement, Michael B. und Tse, Senyo Y. (2005). Financial analyst characteristicsand herding behavior in forecasting. The Journal of Finance, 60(1):307–341.

Coffee, John C., Jr. (1986). Shareholders versus managers: The strain in the cor-porate web. Michigan Law Review, 85(1):1–109.

Cohen, Jacob (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1):155–159.

Conyon, Martin J. und Murphy, Kevin J. (2000). The prince and the pauper?CEO pay in the United States and United Kingdom. The Economic Journal,110(467):F640–F671.

Copeland, Thomas E., Weston, John Fred, und Shastri, Kuldeep (2005). Financialtheory and corporate policy. Pearson/Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.

Page 34: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Literaturverzeichnis 287

Cornell, Bradford und Landsman, Wayne R. (1989). Security price response toquarterly earnings announcements and analysts’ forecast revisions. The Accoun-ting Review, 64(4):680–692.

Cornett, Marcia und De, Sankar (1991). Common stock returns in corporate takeo-ver bids: Evidence from interstate bank mergers. Journal of Banking & Finance,15(2):273–295.

Cottle, Sidney, Murray, Roger F., und Block, Frank E. (1988). Graham and Dodd’ssecurity analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

Cournot, Augustin (1897 [1838]). Researches into the mathematical principles ofthe theory of wealth. The Macmillan Company, London, UK.

Daily Deal (2001). The energy sector’s got the urge to merge. 02. Januar.

Daily Mail (2006). What’s next on the menu? 19. September.

Daily Variety (1999). Levin’s tw strategy paying off: Bottom line. 05. Januar.

Dalton, Dan R., Daily, Catherine M., Certo, S. Trevis, und Roengpitya, Rungpen(2003). Meta-analyses of financial performance and equity: Fusion or confusion?The Academy of Management Journal, 46(1):13–26.

Das, Somnath, Levine, Carolyn B., und Sivaramakrishnan, K. (1998). Earningspredictability and bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review,73(2):277–294.

Davis, E. P. und Steil, Benn (2001). Institutional investors. MIT Press, Cambridge,MA.

Davis, G. und Useem, Michael (2002). Top management, company directors, andcorporate control. In: Pettigrew, A., Thomas, H., und Whittington, R. (Hrsg.),Handbook of Strategy and Management. Sage Publications, London, UK, 233–259.

Davis, Gerald F., Diekmann, Kristina A., und Tinsley, Catherine H. (1994). Thedecline and fall of the conglomerate firm in the 1980s: The deinstitutionalizationof an organizational form. American Sociological Review, 59(4):547–570.

Day, Judith F. S. (1986). The use of annual reports by UK investment analysts.Accounting and Business Research, 16(64):295–307.

De Bondt, Werner F. M. und Forbes, William P. (1999). Herding in analyst earningsforecasts: Evidence from the United Kingdom. European Financial Management,5(2):143–163.

Page 35: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

288 Literaturverzeichnis

De Bondt, Werner F. M., Shefrin, Hersh, Muradoglu, Guinur Y., und Staikouras,Sotiris, K. (2008). Behavioural finance: Quo vadis? Journal of Applied Finance,19(2):7–21.

De Bondt, Werner F. M. und Thaler, Richard H. (1990). Do security analystsoverreact? The American Economic Review, 80(2):52–57.

De Noble, Alex F., Gustafson, Loren T., und Hergert, Michael (1988). Planning forpost-merger integration– Eight lessons for merger success. Long Range Planning,21(4):82–85.

Dechow, Patricia M., Hutton, Amy P., und Sloan, Richard G. (2000). The relationbetween analysts’ forecasts of long-term earnings growth and stock price perfor-mance following equity offerings. Contemporary Accounting Research, 17(1):1–32.

Devenow, Andrea und Welch, Ivo (1996). Rational herding in financial economics.European Economic Review, 40(3-5):603–615.

Dixon, W. J. und Yuen, K. K. (1974). Trimming and winsorization: A review.Statistical Papers, 15(2–3):157–170.

Dobbin, Frank und Zorn, Dirk (2005). Corporate malfeasance and the myth ofshareholder value. Political Power and Social Theory, 17:179–198.

Dong, Ming, Hirshleifer, David, Richardson, Scott, und Teoh, Siew Hong (2006).Does investor misvaluation drive the takeover market? The Journal of Finance,61(2):725–762.

Dreman, David N. und Berry, Michael A. (1995). Analyst forecasting errors andtheir implications for security analysis. Financial Analysts Journal, 51(3):30–41.

Duchin, Ran und Schmidt, Breno (2013). Riding the merger wave: Uncertain-ty, reduced monitoring, and bad acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics,107(1):69–88.

Dugar, Amitabh und Nathan, Siva (1995). The effect of investment banking rela-tionships on financial analysts earnings forecasts and investment recommendati-ons. Contemporary Accounting Research, 12(1):131–160.

Duru, Augustine und Reeb, David M. (2002). International diversification andanalysts’ forecast accuracy and bias. The Accounting Review, 77(2):415–433.

Easterbrook, Frank H. (1984). Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. TheAmerican Economic Review, 74(4):650–659.

Easterwood, John C. und Nutt, Stacey R. (1999). Inefficiency in analysts’ ear-nings forecasts: Systematic misreaction or systematic optimism? The Journal ofFinance, 54(5):1777–1797.

Page 36: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Literaturverzeichnis 289

Eccles, Robert G. und Crane, Dwight B. (1988). Doing deals: Investment banks atwork. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

Eckbo, B. Espen, Giammarino, Ronald M., und Heinkel, Robert L. (1990). Asym-metric information and the medium of exchange in takeovers: Theory and tests.The Review of Financial Studies, 3(4):651–675.

Edgeworth, Francis (1925). The pure theory of monopoly. Macmillan, London, UK.

Eichenberger, Reiner (1992). Verhaltensanomalien und Wirtschaftswissenschaft.Dt. Univ.-Verlag, Wiesbaden.

Eis, Carl (1969). The 1919-1930 merger movement in american industry. Journalof Law and Economics, 12(2):267–296.

Eisenbarth, Irmgard (2013). Zeitliche Optimierung von M&A-Entscheidungen. EulVerlag, Lohmar.

Elton, Edwin J., Gruber, Martin J., und Grossman, Seth (1986). Discrete expecta-tional data and portfolio performance. The Journal of Finance, 41(3):699–713.

Elton, Edwin J., Gruber, Martin J., und Gultekin, Mustafa (1981). Expectationsand share prices. Management Science, 27(9):975–987.

Epstein, Marc J. und Palepu, Krishna G. (1999). What financial analysts want?Strategic Finance, 80(10):48–52.

Erlei, Mathias, Leschke, Martin, und Sauerland, Dirk (2007). Neue Institutio-nenokonomik. Schaffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart.

Ertimur, Yonca, Mayew, William J., und Stubben, Stephen R. (2011). Analystreputation and the issuance of disaggregated earnings forecasts to I/B/E/S.16(1):29–58.

Erwin, Gayle R und Perry, Susan E (2000). The effect of foreign diversification onanalysts’ prediction errors. International Review of Financial Analysis, 9(2):121–145.

Eschen, Erik (2002). Der Erfolg von Mergers & Acquisitions: Unternehmungs-zusammenschlusse aus der Sicht des ressourcenbasierten Ansatzes. Dt. Univ.-Verlag, Wiesbaden.

Faccio, Mara und Masulis, Ronald W. (2005). The choice of payment method ineuropean mergers and acquisitions. The Journal of Finance, 60(3):1345–1388.

Fama, Eugene F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empiricalwork. The Journal of Finance, 25(2):383–417.

Page 37: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

290 Literaturverzeichnis

Fama, Eugene F. und French, Kenneth R. (1997). Industry costs of equity. Journalof Financial Economics, 43(2):153–193.

Faria, Andre L. (2008). Mergers and the market for organization capital. Journalof Economic Theory, 138(1):71–100.

Fauli-Oller, Ramon (2000). Takeover waves. Journal of Economics & ManagementStrategy, 9(2):189–210.

Felton, John R. (1971). Conglomerate mergers, concentration and competition.The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 30(3):225–242.

Ferreira, Eurico J. und Smith, Stanley D. (2003). ”Wall Street Week”: Informationor entertainment? Financial Analysts Journal, 59(1):45–53.

Financial Times (2004). M&Assenvermahlung kurz vor Jahresende schießt die Zahlder Fusionen und Ubernahmen rapide in die Hohe. 16. Dezember.

Fischer, Donald E. und Jordan, Ronald J. (1991). Security analysis and portfoliomanagement. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Fishman, Michael J. (1989). Preemptive bidding and the role of the medium ofexchange in acquisitions. The Journal of Finance, 44(1):41–57.

Flannery, Mark J. (1999). Comment on Milbourn, Boot, and Thakor. Journal ofBanking & Finance, 23(2–4):215–220.

Fleischer, Arthur, Jr. und Mundheim, Robert H. (1967). Corporate acquisition bytender offer. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 115(3):317–370.

Fligstein, Neil (1987). The intraorganizational power struggle: Rise of finance per-sonnel to top leadership in large corporations, 1919-1979. American SociologicalReview, 52(1):44–58.

Fluck, Zsuzsanna und Lynch, Anthony W. (1999). Why do firms merge and thendivest? A theory of financial synergy. The Journal of Business, 72(3):319–346.

Fogarty, Timothy J. und Rogers, Rodney K. (2005). Financial analysts’ reports: Anextended institutional theory evaluation. Accounting, Organizations and Society,30(4):331–356.

Francis, Jennifer, Chen, Qi, und Willis, Donna R. (2004). Security analyst inde-pendence. CFA Institute, New York, NY.

Francis, Jennifer und Soffer, Leonard (1997). The relative informativeness of ana-lysts’ stock recommendations and earnings forecast revisions. Journal of Accoun-ting Research, 35(2):193–211.

Page 38: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Literaturverzeichnis 291

French, Dan W. (1989). Security and portfolio analysis: Concepts and management.Merrill Publishing, Indianapolis, IN.

Friedrich, Nico (2007). Die Rolle von Analysten bei der Bewertung von Unterneh-men am Kapitalmarkt. Eul Verlag, Lohmar.

Fuller, Kathleen, Netter, Jeffry, und Stegemoller, Mike (2002). What do returns toacquiring firms tell us? Evidence from firms that make many acquisitions. TheJournal of Finance, 57(4):1763–1793.

Gantumur, Tseveen und Stephan, Andreas (2012). Mergers & Acquisitions and in-novation performance in the telecommunications equipment industry. Industrialand Corporate Change, 21(2):277–314.

Garcıa-Meca, Emma und Sanchez-Ballesta, Juan Pedro (2006). Influences on fi-nancial analyst forecast errors: A meta-analysis. International Business Review,15(1):29–52.

Gartner, Dennis L. und Halbheer, Daniel (2009). Are there waves in merger activityafter all? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27(6):708–718.

Gaughan, Patrick A. (2004). M&A lesson: Beware of empire builders. Journal ofCorporate Accounting & Finance, 15(2):21–23.

Gaughan, Patrick A. (2007). Mergers, acquisitions, and corporate restructurings.Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

Gaughan, Patrick A. (2011). Mergers, acquisitions, and corporate restructurings.Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

Gerke, Wolfgang und Oerke, Marc (1998). Marktbeeinflussung durch Analysten-empfehlungen. Zeitschrift fur Betriebswirtschaft - Erganzungsheft, 2:187–200.

Gerpott, Torsten J. (1993). Integrationsgestaltung und Erfolg von Unternehmensak-quisitionen. Schaffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart.

Gertner, Robert H., Scharfstein, David S., und Stein, Jeremy C. (1994). In-ternal versus external capital markets. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,109(4):1211–1230.

Giesselmann, Marco und Windzio, Michael (2012). Regressionsmodelle zur Analysevon Paneldaten. Springer, Wiesbaden.

Gillan, Stuart L. und Starks, Laura T. (2000). Corporate governance proposals andshareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. Journal of FinancialEconomics, 57(2):275–305.

Page 39: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

292 Literaturverzeichnis

Gilson, Stuart C., Healy, Paul M., Noe, Christopher F., und Palepu, Krishna G.(2001). Analyst specialization and conglomerate stock breakups. Journal ofAccounting Research, 39(3):565–582.

Gimpel-Iske, Eva (1973). Untersuchung zur Vorteilhaftigkeit von Unternehmens-zusammenschlussen. Dissertation, Universitat Bonn, Bonn.

Givoly, Dan und Lakonishok, Josef (1979). The information content of financialanalysts’ forecasts of earnings: Some evidence on semi-strong inefficiency. Journalof Accounting and Economics, 1(3):165–185.

Glaum, Martin, Grothe, Alexander, und Hutzschenreuter, Thomas (2009). Beson-derheiten internationaler Akquisitionen. In: Schmid, Stefan (Hrsg.), Managementder Internationalisierung. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

Glaum, Martin und Hutzschenreuter, Thomas (2010). Mergers & Acquisitions:Management des externen Unternehmenswachstums. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart.

Gleason, Cristi A. und Lee, Charles M. C. (2003). Analyst forecast revisions andmarket price discovery. The Accounting Review, 78(1):193–225.

Golbe, Devra L. und White, Lawrence J. (1993). Catch a wave: The time seriesbehavior of mergers. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 75(3):493–499.

Goldberg, Joachim und von Nitzsch, Rudiger (2004). Behavioral finance: Gewinnenmit Kompetenz. FinanzBuch-Verlag, Munchen.

Gort, Michael (1969). An economic disturbance theory of mergers. The QuarterlyJournal of Economics, 83(4):624–642.

Graham, Benjamin und Dodd, David (1934). Security analysis. McGraw-Hill BookCo., New York, NY.

Graham, Benjamin und Dodd, David (2002). Security analysis: The classic 1940edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

Graham, John R. (1999). Herding among investment newsletters: Theory andevidence. The Journal of Finance, 54(1):237–268.

Greene, William H. (2012). Econometric analysis. Pearson, Boston, MA.

Gregory, Alan (2005). The long run abnormal performance of UK acquirersand the free cash flow hypothesis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,32(5/6):777–814.

Grinblatt, Mark und Titman, Sheridan (2002). Financial markets and corporatestrategy. McGraw-Hill Irwin, Boston, MA.

Page 40: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Literaturverzeichnis 293

Groysberg, Boris, Healy, Paul, und Chapman, Craig (2008). Buy-side vs. sell-sideanalysts’ earnings forecasts. Financial Analysts Journal, 64(4):25–39.

Gruber, Martin J. (1996). Another puzzle: The growth in actively managed mutualfunds. The Journal of Finance, 51(3):783–810.

Gu, Zhaoyang und Wu, Joanna Shuang (2003). Earnings skewness and analystforecast bias. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 35(1):5–29.

Guedj, Olivier und Bouchaud, Jean-Philippe (2005). Experts’ earning forecasts:Bias, herding, and gossamer information. International Journal of Theoreticaland Applied Finance, 8(7):933–946.

Guenther, David A und Rosman, Andrew J (1994). Differences between COMPU-STAT and CRSP SIC codes and related effects on research. Journal of Accountingand Economics, 18(1):115–128.

Gugler, Klaus, Peev, Evgeni, und Segalla, Esther (2013). The internal workings ofinternal capital markets: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance,20(0):59–73.

Haleblian, Jerayr, Devers, Cynthia E., McNamara, Gerry, Carpenter, Mason A.,und Davison, Robert B. (2009). Taking stock of what we know about mergers andacquisitions: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 35(3):469–502.

Haleblian, Jerayr, McNamara, Gerry, Kolev, Kalin, und Dykes, Bernadine J.(2012). Exploring firm characteristics that differentiate leaders from followersin industry merger waves: A competitive dynamics perspective. Strategic Mana-gement Journal, 33(9):1037–1052.

Hamilton, James D. (1989). A new approach to the economic analysis of nonsta-tionary time series and the business cycle. Econometrica, 57(2):357–384.

Hansen, Robert G. (1987). A theory for the choice of exchange medium in mergersand acquisitions. The Journal of Business, 60(1):75–95.

Harford, Jarrad (2005). What drives merger waves? Journal of Financial Econo-mics, 77(3):529–560.

Harvey, Keith D. und Shrieves, Ronald E. (2001). Executive compensation struc-ture and corporate governance choices. Journal of Financial Research, 24(4):495–512.

Haspeslagh, Philippe C. und Jemison, David B. (1991). Managing acquisitions:Creating value through corporate renewal. Free Press, New York, NY.

Page 41: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

294 Literaturverzeichnis

Hausman, Jerry A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica,46(6):1251–1271.

Haw, In-Mu, Jung, Kooyul, und Ruland, William (1994). The accuracy of financialanalysts’ forecasts after mergers. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance,9(3):465–483.

Hawawini, Gabriel A. und Swary, Itzhak (1990). Mergers and acquisitions in the USbanking industry: evidence from the capital markets. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

Hax, Georg (1998). Informationsintermediation durch Finanzanalysten. Lang,Frankfurt a.M.

Hayashi, Fumio (1982). Tobin’s marginal q and average q: A neoclassical interpre-tation. Econometrica, 50(1):213–224.

Hayes, Rachel M. (1998). The impact of trading commission incentives on analysts’stock coverage decisions and earnings forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research,36(2):299–320.

Hayward, Mathew L. A. und Hambrick, Donald C. (1997). Explaining the premi-ums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative ScienceQuarterly, 42(1):103–127.

Heine, Michael und Herr, Hansjorg (1999). Volkswirtschaftslehre. Oldenbourg,Munchen.

Higgins, Robert C. und Schall, Lawrence D. (1975). Corporate bankruptcy andconglomerate merger. The Journal of Finance, 30(1):93–113.

Hinne, Carsten (2008). Mergers & Acquisitions Management: Bedeutung und Er-folgsbeitrag unternehmensinterner M&A-Dienstleister. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

Hirshleifer, David (1995). The blind leading the blind: Social influence, fads, andinformational cascades. In: Tommasi, Mariano und Ierulli, Kathryn (Hrsg.), Thenew economics of human behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,MA, 188–215.

Hirshleifer, D. und Hong, Teoh S. (2003). Herd behaviour and cascading in capitalmarkets: A review and synthesis. European Financial Management, 9(1):25–66.

Ho, Michael J. und Harris, Robert S. (1998). Market reactions to messages frombrokerage ratings systems. Financial Analysts Journal, 54(1):49–57.

Hoberg, Gerard und Phillips, Gordon (2010). Product market synergies and com-petition in mergers and acquisitions: A text-based analysis. Review of FinancialStudies, 23(10):3773–3811.

Page 42: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Literaturverzeichnis 295

Hodgkinson, Lynn (2001). Analysts’ forecasts and the broker relationship. Journalof Business Finance & Accounting, 28(7/8):943–961.

Holmstrom, Bengt (1979). Moral hazard and observability. The Bell Journal ofEconomics, 10(1):74–91.

Hong, Harrison, Kubik, Jeffrey D., und Solomon, Amit (2000). Security analysts’career concerns and herding of earnings forecasts. The RAND Journal of Eco-nomics, 31(1):121–144.

Hooke, Jeffrey C. (1998). Security analysis on Wall Street: A comprehensive guideto today’s valuation methods. Wiley, New York.

Hooke, Jeffrey C. (2010). Security analysis and business valuation on Wall Street:A comprehensive guide to today’s valuation methods. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

Hoskisson, Robert E. und Hitt, Michael A. (1990). Antecedents and performanceoutcomes of diversification: A review and critique of theoretical perspectives.Journal of Management, 16(2):461–509.

How, Janice C. Y., Phung, Yion K., und Verhoeven, Peter (2005). Accuracy ofanalysts’ earnings forecasts: Evidence from mergers and acquisitions in Australia.Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 1:67–80.

Huang, Jing, Pierce, Josh, und Tsyplakov, Sergey (2011). Post-merger integrationduration and leverage dynamics of mergers: Theory and evidence. Working paper,University of South Carolina.

Huang, Yen-Sheng und Walkling, Ralph A. (1987). Target abnormal returns asso-ciated with acquisition announcements: Payment, acquisition form, and mana-gerial resistance. Journal of Financial Economics, 19(2):329–349.

Hubbard, R. Glenn (1998). Capital-market imperfections and investment. Journalof Economic Literature, 36(1):193–225.

Huber, Peter J. (1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates undernonstandard conditions. In: LeCam, Lucien M. und Jerzy, Neyman (Hrsg.),Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics andProbability I. University of California Press, Columbia, SC, 221–233.

Huberts, Lex C. und Fuller, Russell J. (1995). Predictability bias in the US equitymarket. Financial Analysts Journal, 51(2):12–28.

Huemer, Friedrich (1991). Mergers & Acquisitions: Strategische und finanzielleAnalyse von Unternehmensubernahmen. Lang, Frankfurt a.M.

Page 43: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

296 Literaturverzeichnis

Hughes, Alan, Mueller, Dennis C., und Singh, Ajit (1980). Hypotheses about mer-gers. In: The determinants and effects of mergers: an international comparison.Cambridge, Cambridge, MA, 27–66.

I/B/E/S (2015). Estimates: I/B/E/S, First Call, Reuters and Starmine(15.05.2015). http://thomsonreuters.com/content/dam/openweb/documents/

Imhoff, Eugene A. und Lobo, Gerald J. (1984). Information content of analysts’composite forecast revisions. Journal of Accounting Research, 22(2):541–554.

Investor’s Business Daily (2000). Digital services may guide cable tv stocks backup. 17. Mai.

Jackson, Andrew R. (2005). Trade generation, reputation, and sell-side analysts.The Journal of Finance, 60(2):673–717.

Jacob, John, Lys, Thomas Z., und Neale, Margaret A. (1999). Expertise in fore-casting performance of security analysts. Journal of Accounting and Economics,28(1):51–82.

Jansen, Stephan A. (2004). Management von Unternehmenszusammenschlussen:Theorien, Thesen, Tests und Tools. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart.

Jansen, Stephan A. (2008). Mergers and Acquisitions: Unternehmensakquisitionenund -Kooperationen. Eine strategische, organisatorische und kapitalmarkttheore-tische Einfuhrung. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

Jarrell, Gregg A., Brickley, James A., und Netter, Jeffry M. (1988). The market forcorporate control: The empirical evidence since 1980. The Journal of EconomicPerspectives, 2(1):49–68.

Jegadeesh, Narasimhan und Kim, Woojin (2006). Value of analyst recommendati-ons: International evidence. Journal of Financial Markets, 9(3):274–309.

Jemison, David B. und Sitkin, Sim B (1986). Corporate acquisitions: A processperspective. The Academy of Management Review, 11(1):145–163.

Jensen, Michael C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, andtakeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2):323–329.

Jensen, Michael C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failureof internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3):831–880.

Jensen, Michael C. und Meckling, William H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Ma-nagerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of FinancialEconomics, 3(4):305–360.

pdf/financial/estimates-fact-sheet.pdf.

Page 44: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Literaturverzeichnis 297

Jensen, Michael C. und Ruback, Richard S. (1983). The market for corporatecontrol: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1–4):5–50.

Jovanovic, Boyan und Rousseau, Peter L. (2002). The q-theory of mergers. Ame-rican Economic Review, 92(2):198–204.

Jovanovic, Boyan und Rousseau, Peter L. (2008). Mergers as reallocation. Reviewof Economics & Statistics, 90(4):765–776.

Kahle, Kathleen M. und Walkling, Ralph A. (1996). The impact of industry classi-fications on financial research. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Ana-lysis, 31(3):309–335.

Kaplan, Steven (1989a). Management buyouts: Evidence on taxes as a source ofvalue. The Journal of Finance, 44(3):611–632.

Kaplan, Steven N. (1989b). Sources of value in management buyouts. In: Amihud,Yakov (Hrsg.), Leveraged management buyouts: Causes and consequences. DowJones-Irwin, Homewood, IL, 95–101.

Kaplan, Steven N. und Ruback, Richard S. (1995). The valuation of cash flowforecasts: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Finance, 50(4):1059–1093.

Karenfort, Stefan (2011). Synergy in Mergers & Acquisitions: The Role of BusinessRelatedness. Eul Verlag, Lohmar.

Karpoff, Jonathan M., Malatesta, Paul H., und Walkling, Ralph A. (1996). Cor-porate governance and shareholder initiatives: Empirical evidence. Journal ofFinancial Economics, 42(3):365–395.

Keren, Michael und Levhari, David (1983). The internal organization of the firmand the shape of average costs. The Bell Journal of Economics, 14(2):474–486.

Kerler, Patrick (2000). Mergers & Acquisitions und shareholder value. Haupt,Bern.

Keynes, John M. (1964 [ND 1936]). The general theory of employment interest andmoney. MacMillan, London, UK.

Khorana, Ajay und Zenner, Marc (1998). Executive compensation of large acquirorsin the 1980s. Journal of Corporate Finance, 4(3):209–240.

Kim, Chansog und Pantzalis, Christos (2003). Global/industrial diversification andanalyst herding. Financial Analysts Journal, 59(2):69–79.

Kim, E. Han und Singal, Vijay (1993). Mergers and market power: Evidence fromthe airline industry. American Economic Review, 83(3):549–569.

Page 45: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

298 Literaturverzeichnis

Kolasinski, Adam C. und Kothari, S. P. (2008). Investment banking and ana-lyst objectivity: Evidence from analysts affiliated with mergers and acquisitionsadvisors. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43(4):817–842.

Kolev, Kalin, Haleblian, Jerayr, und McNamara, Gerry (2012). A review of themerger and acquisition wave literature: History, antecedents, consequences, andfuture directions. In: Faulkner, David, Teerikangas, Satu, und Joseph, Richard J.(Hrsg.), The Handbook of Mergers and Acquisitions. Oxford University Press,Oxford, UK, 19–39.

Kothari, S. P. (2001). Capital markets research in accounting. Journal of Accoun-ting and Economics, 31(1–3):105–231.

Kothari, S. P. und Warner, Jerold B. (2008). Econometrics of event studies. In:Eckbo, Espen B. (Hrsg.), Handbook of Empirical Corporate Finance. North Hol-land, Amsterdam, 3–36.

Krishnan, Jayanthi und Press, Eric (2003). The north american industry clas-sification system and its implications for accounting research. ContemporaryAccounting Research, 20(4):685–717.

Kruschwitz, Lutz und Loffler, Andreas (2006). Discounted cash flow: A theory ofthe valuation of firms. Wiley, Chichester, UK.

Kwan, Simon H. und Wilcox, James A. (1999). Hidden cost reductions in bankmergers: Accounting for more productive banks’. Working Paper 99/10, FederalReserve Bank of San Francisco.

Laeven, Luc und Levine, Ross (2007). Is there a diversification discount in financialconglomerates? Journal of Financial Economics, 85(2):331–367.

Lakonishok, Josef, Shleifer, Andrei, und Vishny, Robert W. (1992). The impact ofinstitutional trading on stock prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 32(1):23–43.

Lambrecht, Bart M. und Myers, Stewart C. (2007). A theory of takeovers anddisinvestment. The Journal of Finance, 62(2):809–845.

Lane, Peter J., Cannella, Albert A., und Lubatkin, Michael H. (1998). Agencyproblems as antecedents to unrelated mergers and diversification: Amihud andLev reconsidered. Strategic Management Journal, 19(6):555–578.

Lang, Larry H. P., Stulz, Rene M., und Walkling, Ralph A. (1989). Managerialperformance, Tobin’s Q, and the gains from successful tender offers. Journal ofFinancial Economics, 24(1):137–154.

Page 46: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Literaturverzeichnis 299

Lang, Mark H. und Lundholm, Russell J. (1996). Corporate disclosure policy andanalyst behavior. The Accounting Review, 71(4):467–492.

Langetieg, Terence C. (1978). An application of a three-factor performance indexto measure stockholder gains from merger. Journal of Financial Economics,6(4):365–383.

Lenhard, Rainer (2009). Erfolgsfaktoren von Mergers & Acquisitions in der eu-ropaischen Telekommunikationsindustrie. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

Levy, Haim und Sarnat, Marshall (1970). Diversification, portfolio analysis and theuneasy case for conglomerate mergers. The Journal of Finance, 25(4):795–802.

Lewellen, Wilbur G. (1971). A pure financial rationale for the conglomerate merger.The Journal of Finance, 26(2):521–537.

Li, Feng, Lundholm, Russell J., und Minnis, Michael (2013). A measure of compe-tition based on 10-k filings. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(2):399–436.

Liang, Bing (1999). Price pressure: Evidence from the “dartboard”column. TheJournal of Business, 72(1):119–134.

Liebeskind, Julia P., Opler, Tim C., und Hatfield, Donald E. (1996). Corporaterestructuring and the consolidation of us industry. The Journal of IndustrialEconomics, 44(1):53–68.

Lim, Terence (2001). Rationality and analysts’ forecast bias. The Journal ofFinance, 56(1):369–385.

Lin, Hsiou-wei und McNichols, Maureen F (1998). Underwriting relationships, ana-lysts’ earnings forecasts and investment recommendations. Journal of Accountingand Economics, 25(1):101–127.

Linn, Scott C. und Zhu, Zhen (1997). Aggregate merger activity: New evidence onthe wave hypothesis. Southern Economic Journal, 64(1):130–146.

Litov, Lubomir P., Moreton, Patrick, und Zenger, Todd R. (2012). Corporatestrategy, analyst coverage, and the uniqueness paradox. Management Science,58(10):1797–1815.

Loefert, Christian (2007). Unternehmensreputation und M&A-Transaktionen: Be-wertung strategischer Entscheidungen in der US-amerikanischen Finanz- undTelekommunikationsindustrie. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

Loffler, Gunter (1998). Der Beitrag von Finanzanalysten zur Informationsverar-beitung: Eine empirische Untersuchung fur den deutschen Aktienmarkt. Gabler,Wiesbaden.

Page 47: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

300 Literaturverzeichnis

Lucks, Kai und Meckl, Reinhard (2002). Internationale Mergers & Acquisitions:Der prozessorientierte Ansatz. Springer, Berlin.

Macharzina, Klaus (1999). Unternehmensfuhrung: Das internationale Manage-mentwissen. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

MacKinlay, A. Craig (1997). Event studies in economics and finance. Journal ofEconomic Literature, 35(1):13–39.

Maksimovic, Vojislav und Phillips, Gordon (2001). The market for corporate assets:Who engages in mergers and asset sales and are there efficiency gains? TheJournal of Finance, 56(6):2019–2065.

Mandelker, Gershon (1974). Risk and return: The case of merging firms. Journalof Financial Economics, 1(4):303–335.

Manne, Henry G. (1965). Mergers and the market for corporate control. Journalof Political Economy, 73(2):110–120.

Markides, Constantinos C. (1992). Consequences of corporate refocusing: Ex anteevidence. The Academy of Management Journal, 35(2):398–412.

Markowitz, Harry (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1):77–91.

Marris, Robin (1963). A model of the ”managerial enterprise“. The QuarterlyJournal of Economics, 77(2):185–209.

Martin, Kenneth J. (1996). The method of payment in corporate acquisitions,investment opportunities, and management ownership. The Journal of Finance,51(4):1227–1246.

Martynova, Marina und Renneboog, Luc (2008). A century of corporate takeovers:What have we learned and where do we stand? Journal of Banking & Finance,32(10):2148 – 2177.

Mathews, Richmond D. und Robinson, David T. (2008). Market structure, inter-nal capital markets, and the boundaries of the firm. The Journal of Finance,63(6):2703–2736.

McElreath, Robert B. und Wiggins, C. Donald (1984). Using the Compustat ta-pes in financial research: Problems and solutions. Financial Analysts Journal,40(1):71–76.

McKie, James W. (1955). The decline of monopoly in the metal container industry.The American Economic Review, 45(2):499–508.

Page 48: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Literaturverzeichnis 301

McNamara, Gerry M., Haleblain, Jerayer, und Dykes, Bernadine Johnson (2008).The performance implications of participating in an acquisition wave: Early mo-ver advantages, bandwagon effects, and the moderating influence of industrycharacteristics and acquirer tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1):113–130.

Mensah, Yaw M. und Yang, Rong (2008). An empirical evaluation of analysts’herding behavior following regulation fair disclosure. Journal of Accounting andPublic Policy, 27(4):317–338.

Meyer, Margaret, Milgrom, Paul, und Roberts, John (1992). Organizational pro-spects, influence costs, and ownership changes. Journal of Economics & Mana-gement Strategy, 1(1):9–35.

Michaelsen, Lars (2001). Informationsintermediation fur Privatanleger am Ak-tienmarkt unter besonderer Berucksichtigung des neuen Marktes. Eul Verlag,Lohmar.

Michaely, Roni und Womack, Kent L. (1999). Conflict of interest and the credibilityof underwriter analyst recommendations. Review of Financial Studies, 12(4):653–686.

Mikhail, Michael B., Walther, Beverly R., und Willis, Richard H. (1999). Doesforecast accuracy matter to security analysts? The Accounting Review, 74(2):185–200.

Miles, Robert P. (2002). The Warren Buffett CEO: Secrets from the BerkshireHathaway Managers. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., New York.

Mills, Lillian F, Newberry, Kaye J, und Novack, Garth F (2003). How well doCompustat NOL data identify firms with US tax return loss carryovers? TheJournal of the American Taxation Association, 25(2):1–17.

Mitchell, Mark L. und Mulherin, J. Harold (1996). The impact of industryshocks on takeover and restructuring activity. Journal of Financial Economics,41(2):193–229.

Moeller, Sara B., Schlingemann, Frederik P., und Stulz, Rene M. (2005). Wealthdestruction on a massive scale? A study of acquiring-firm returns in the recentmerger wave. The Journal of Finance, 60(2):757–782.

Monsen, R. Joseph, Jr. und Downs, Anthony (1965). A theory of large managerialfirms. Journal of Political Economy, 73(3):221–236.

Morck, Randall, Shleifer, Andrei, und Vishny, Robert W. (1989). Alternative me-chanisms for corporate control. The American Economic Review, 79(4):842–852.

Page 49: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

302 Literaturverzeichnis

Moreton, Patrick und Zenger, Todd R. (2004). ‘Information intermediaries’ incenti-ves and corporate strategy choices in the us. In: Grandori, A. (Hrsg.), CorporateGovernance and Firm Organization. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 113–140.

Morgan Stanley (1999). Eastman kodak: Springtime trifecta; upgrade to outper-form. April 30.

Moyer, R. Charles, Chatfield, Robert E., und Sisneros, Phillip M. (1989). Securityanalyst monitoring activity: Agency costs and information demands. The Journalof Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 24(4):503–512.

Mueller, Dennis C. (1969). A theory of conglomerate mergers. The QuarterlyJournal of Economics, 83(4):643–659.

Mulherin, J. Harold und Boone, Audra L. (2000). Comparing acquisitions anddivestitures. Journal of Corporate Finance, 6(2):117–139.

Muller-Stewens, G. (2009). Konsequenzen fur den markt fur unternehmenskon-trolle. In: Lechner, Christoph (Hrsg.), Konsequenzen aus der Finanzmarktkrise.Perspektiven der HSG. St. Gallen, 32–39.

Muller-Stewens, Gunter (2012). M&A-Wellen: Ursachen und Verlauf. In: HandbuchMergers & Acquisitions. Schaffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart, 48–85.

Murphy, B. J. (1987). Selecting out of control variables with the $T2$ multivariatequality control procedure. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 36(5):571–581.

Nelson, Ralph L. (1959). Merger Movements in American Industry, 1895-1956.Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Nicolai, Alexander und Seidl, David (2010). That’s relevant! different forms ofpractical relevance in management science. Organization Studies, 31(9-10):1257–1285.

Nicolai, Alexander T., Schulz, Ann-Christine, und Thomas, Thomas W. (2010).What wall street wants–exploring the role of security analysts in the evolutionand spread of management concepts. Journal of Management Studies, 47(1):162–189.

Nicolai, Alexander T. und Thomas, Thomas W. (2004). Kapitalmarktkonforme Un-ternehmensfuhrung: Eine Analyse im Lichte der jungeren Strategieprozesslehre.Zeitschrift fur betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, (August):452–469.

Nicolai, Alexander T. und Thomas, Thomas W. (2006). De-diversification acti-vities of german corporations from 1988 to 2002: Perspectives from agency andmanagement fashion theory. Schmalenbach Business Review, 58:56–80.

Page 50: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Literaturverzeichnis 303

Nilssen, Tore und Sorgard, Lars (1998). Sequential horizontal mergers. EconomicEuropean Review, 42(9):1683–1702.

Oberdorster, Tatjana (2009). Finanzberichterstattung und Prognosefehler von Fi-nanzanalysten. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

O’Brien, Patricia C. (1988). Analysts’ forecasts as earnings expectations. Journalof Accounting and Economics, 10(1):53–83.

O’Brien, Patricia C. (1990). Forecast accuracy of individual analysts in nine in-dustries. Journal of Accounting Research, 28(2):286–304.

Oehler, Andreas (2002). Behavioral finance, verhaltenswissenschaftliche finanz-marktforschung und portfoliomanagement. In: Kleeberg, Jochen M. und Reh-kugler, Heinz (Hrsg.), Handbuch Portfoliomanagement: Strukturierte Ansatze furein modernes Wertpapiermanagement. Uhlenbruch, Bad Soden, 843–870.

Oehlrich, Marcus (1999). Strategische Analyse von Unternehmensakquisitionen:Das Beispiel der pharmazeutischen Industrie. Dt. Univ.-Verlag, Wiesbaden.

Olsen, Robert A. (1996). Implications of herding behavior for earnings estimation,risk assessment, and stock returns. Financial Analysts Journal, 52(4):37–41.

Panzar, John C. und Willig, Robert D. (1981). Economies of scope. The AmericanEconomic Review, 71(2):268–272.

Park, Chul W. und Stice, Earl K. (2000). Analyst forecasting ability and the stockprice reaction to forecast revisions. 5(3):259–272.

Payne, Jeff L. und Thomas, Wayne B. (2003). The implications of using stock-split adjusted I/B/E/S data in empirical research. The Accounting Review,78(4):1049–1067.

Pearson, Karl (1901). On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points inspace. Philosophical Magazine Series 6, 2(11):559–572.

Pesendorfer, Martin (2003). Horizontal mergers in the paper industry. RANDJournal of Economics, 34(3):495–515.

Philadelphia Daily News (1998). Smithkline ponders huge drug merger. 21. Januar.

Philbrick, Donna R. und Ricks, William E. (1991). Using value line and IBES ana-lyst forecasts in accounting research. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2):397–417.

Pike, Richard, Meerjanssen, Johannes, und Chadwick, Leslie (1993). The appraisalof ordinary shares by investment analysts in the UK and Germany. Accounting& Business Research, 23(92):489–499.

Page 51: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

304 Literaturverzeichnis

Pontiff, Jeffrey und Woodgate, Artemiza (2008). Share issuance and cross-sectionalreturns. The Journal of Finance, 63(2):921–945.

Porter, Michael E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Indus-tries and Competitors. Free Press, New York, NY.

Prahalad, C. K. und Bettis, Richard A. (1986). The dominant logic: A new linkagebetween diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7(6):485–501.

Prudential Securities (1994). Eastman kodak: Company update. April 12.

Pryor, Frederic L. (2001). Dimensions of the worldwide merger boom. Journal ofEconomic Issues, 35(4):825–840.

Qiu, Larry D. und Zhou, Wen (2007). Merger waves: A model of endogenousmergers. RAND Journal of Economics, 38(1):214–226.

Ramnath, Sundaresh, Rock, Steve, und Shane, Philip (2005). Value line andI/B/E/S earnings forecasts. International Journal of Forecasting, 21(1):185–198.

Ramnath, Sundaresh, Rock, Steve, und Shane, Philip (2008). The financial ana-lyst forecasting literature: A taxonomy with suggestions for further research.International Journal of Forecasting, 24(1):34–75.

Rao, Hayagreeva, Greve, Henrich R., und Davis, Gerald F. (2001). Fool’s gold: So-cial proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by wall street analysts.Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3):502–526.

Rao, Hayagreeva und Sivakumar, Kumar (1999). Institutional sources of boundary-spanning structures: The establishment of investor relations departments in theFortune 500 industrials. Organization Science, 10(1):27–42.

Rappaport, Alfred (1986). Creating shareholder value: The new standard for busi-ness performance. Free Press, New York, NY.

Rauh, Joshua D. und Sufi, Amir (2012). Explaining corporate capital structure:Product markets, leases, and asset similarity. Review of Finance, 16(1):115–155.

Ravencraft, David J. und Scherer, Frederic M. (1987). Mergers, sell-offs, andeconomic efficiency. Brookings Institution Press, Washington D.C.

Reed, Richard und Luffman, George A. (1986). Diversification: The growing con-fusion. Strategic Management Journal, 7(1):29–35.

Rhodes-Kropf, Matthew und Robinson, David T. (2008). The market for mergersand the boundaries of the firm. The Journal of Finance, 63(3):1169–1211.

Page 52: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Literaturverzeichnis 305

Rhodes-Kropf, Matthew, Robinson, David T., und Viswanathan, S. (2005). Va-luation waves and merger activity: The empirical evidence. Journal of FinancialEconomics, 77(3):561–603.

Rhodes-Kropf, Matthew und Viswanathan, S. (2004). Market valuation and mergerwaves. The Journal of Finance, 59(6):2685–2718.

Richardson, Scott, Teoh, Siew Hong, und Wysocki, Peter D. (2004). The walk-downto beatable analyst forecasts: The role of equity issuance and insider tradingincentives. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(4):885–924.

Roediger, Tobias (2011). Werte schaffen durch M&A-Transaktionen. Gabler, Wies-baden.

Roll, Richard (1986). The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. The Journalof Business, 59(2):197–216.

Rosenberg, Barr, Kenneth, Reid, und Lanstein, Ronald (1985). Persuasive evidenceof market inefficiency. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 11:9–16.

Ross, Stephen A. (1973). The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem.The American Economic Review, 63(2):134–139.

Rumelt, Richard P. (1974). Strategy, structure and economic performance. HarvardScholl Business Press, Boston, MA.

Ryan, Harley E. und Wiggins, Roy A. (2001). The influence of firm- and manager-specific characteristics on the structure of executive compensation. Journal ofCorporate Finance, 7(2):101–123.

Ryan, Lori Verstegen und Schneider, Marguerite (2002). The antecedents of insti-tutional investor activism. The Academy of Management Review, 27(4):554–573.

Salant, Stephen W., Switzer, Sheldon, und Reynolds, Robert J. (1983). Losses fromhorizontal merger: The effects of an exogenous change in industry structure oncournot-nash equilibrium. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(2):185–199.

San Jose Mercury News (1994). TCI seeks to buy smaller bay area cable rivals.24. Mai.

San Jose Mercury News (2001). Impact time is now ripe for consolidation inhigh-tech industry deal could prompt other companies to combine forces. 05.September.

Schallenberg, Dirk (1995). Akquisitionen und Kooperationen: eine entscheidungs-orientierte Analyse von Unternehmenszusammenschlussen in der Textilwirt-schaft. Eul Verlag, Lohmar.

Page 53: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

306 Literaturverzeichnis

Scharfstein, David S. und Stein, Jeremy C. (1990). Herd behavior and investment.The American Economic Review, 80(3):465–479.

Scharfstein, David S. und Stein, Jeremy C. (2000). The dark side of internalcapital markets: Divisional rent-seeking and inefficient investment. The Journalof Finance, 55(6):2537–2564.

Scherer, Frederic M. (1970). Industrial market structure and economic performance.Rand McNally, Chicago, IL.

Schipper, Katherine (1991). Analysts’ forecasts. Accounting Horizons, 5(4):105–121.

Schmidt, Dennis R. und Fowler, Karen L. (1990). Post-acquisition financial perfor-mance and executive compensation. Strategic Management Journal, 11(7):559–569.

Schnedler, Wendelin (2005). Likelihood estimation for censored random vectors.Econometric Reviews, 24(2):195–217.

Schon, Benjamin (2013). Mergers & Acquisitions als strategisches Instrument: DieErschließung technologischen Wissens mittels Unternehmenszusammenschlussen.Springer, Wiesbaden.

Schulz, Ann-Christin (2011). Die Rolle der Finanzanalysten bei der Verbreitungvon Managementkonzepten. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

Schwab, Donald P. (2011). Research methods for organizational studies. Routledge,New York, NY.

Schwarze, Jochen (1980). Statistische Kenngroßen zur Ex-Post-Beurteilung vonPrognosen (Prognosefehlermaße). In: Schwarze, Jochen (Hrsg.), Angewandte Pro-gnoseverfahren. Berlin, 317–344.

Servaes, Henri (1991). Tobin’s Q and the gains from takeovers. The Journal ofFinance, 46(1):409–419.

Seth, Anju (1990). Value creation in acquisitions: A re-examination of performanceissues. Strategic Management Journal, 11(2):99–115.

Settnik, Ulrike (2006). Mergers & Acquisitions auf dem deutschen Versicherungs-markt: Eine empirische Analyse. Dt. Univ.-Verlag, Wiesbaden.

Shea, John (1999). What do technology shocks do? In: Bernanke, Ben und Ro-temberg, Julio (Hrsg.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual. MIT Press, Cambridge,MA, 275–322.

Page 54: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Literaturverzeichnis 307

Shiller, Robert J. (1993). Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subse-quent changes in dividends. In: Thaler, Richard H. (Hrsg.), Advances in behavi-oral finance. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 107–132.

Shimizu, Katsuhiko, Hitt, Michael A, Vaidyanath, Deepa, und Pisano, Vincen-zo (2004). Theoretical foundations of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: Areview of current research and recommendations for the future. Journal of In-ternational Management, 10(3):307–353.

Shleifer, Andrei und Summers, Lawrence H. (1988). Breach of trust in hostiletakeovers. In: Auerbach, Alan J. (Hrsg.), Corporate takeovers: Causes and con-sequences. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 33–68.

Shleifer, Andrei und Vishny, Robert W. (1989). Management entrenchment:The case of manager-specific investments. Journal of Financial Economics,25(1):123–139.

Shleifer, Andrei und Vishny, Robert W. (1990). The takeover wave of the 1980s.Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 4(3):49–56.

Shleifer, Andrei und Vishny, Robert W. (1991). Takeovers in the ’60s and the ’80s:Evidence and implications. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S2):51–59.

Shleifer, Andrei und Vishny, Robert W. (2003). Stock market driven acquisitions.Journal of Financial Economics, 70(3):295–311.

Shughart, William F. und Tollison, Robert D. (1984). The random character ofmerger activity. The RAND Journal of Economics, 15(4):500–509.

Sibilkov, Valeriy, Straska, Miroslava, und Waller, H. Gregory (2013). Do firms usem&a business to pay for analyst coverage? Financial Review, 48(4):725–751.

Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between twothings. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(1):72–101.

Spector, Paul E. und Brannick, Michael T. (2011). Methodological urban legends:The misuse of statistical control variables. Organizational Research Methods,14(2):287–305.

Sprent, Peter (1993). Applied nonparametric statistical methods. Chapmann &Hall, London, UK.

Stanzel, Matthias (2007). Qualitat des Aktienresearch von Finanzanalysten: Einetheoretische und empirische Untersuchung der Gewinnprognosen und Aktienemp-fehlungen am deutschen Kapitalmarkt. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

Page 55: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

308 Literaturverzeichnis

Stearns, Linda Brewster und Allan, Kenneth D. (1996). Economic behavior ininstitutional environments: The corporate merger wave of the 1980s. AmericanSociological Review, 61(4):699–718.

Stein, Jeremy C. (1997). Internal capital markets and the competition for corporateresources. The Journal of Finance, 52(1):111–133.

Steindel, Charles (1986). Tax reform and the merger and acquisition market: Therepeal of general utilities. Quarterly Review, Autumn:31–35.

Stickel, Scott E. (1991). Common stock returns surrounding earnings forecastrevisions: More puzzling evidence. The Accounting Review, 66(2):402–416.

Stickel, Scott E. (1992). Reputation and performance among security analysts.The Journal of Finance, 47(5):1811–1836.

Stickel, Scott E. (1995). The anatomy of the performance of buy and sell recom-mendations. Financial Analysts Journal, 51(5):25–39.

Stigler, George J. (1950). Monopoly and oligopoly by merger. The AmericanEconomic Review, 40(2):23–34.

Stillman, Robert (1983). Examining antitrust policy towards horizontal mergers.Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1–4):225–240.

Stotz, Olaf und von Nitzsch, Rudiger (2003). Warum sich Analysten uberschatzen- Einfluss des Kontrollgefuhls auf die Selbstuberschatzung. Zeitschrift fur Bank-recht und Bankwirtschaft, 15(2):106–113.

Stulz, Rene M. (1990). Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. Jour-nal of Financial Economics, 26(1):3–27.

Sudarsanam, P. S. (1995). The role of defensive strategies and ownership structureof target firms: Evidence from uk hostile takeover bids. European FinancialManagement, 1(3):223–240.

Szidarovszky, Ferenc und Yakowitz, Sidney J. (1982). Contributions to Cournotoligopoly theory. Journal of Economic Theory, 28(1):51–70.

Teece, David J. (1982). Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm.Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(1):39–63.

The American Banker (1998). Banks step up activity in health-care sector. 05.May.

The Globe and Mail (1997). Office Depot ruling may spark deals consolidation ex-pected to follow as big players bid for catalogue suppliers and contract stationers.02. Juli.

Page 56: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Literaturverzeichnis 309

The New York Times (1995). Bellsouth to sell its paging unit to mobilemedia. 15.September.

The New York Times (1996a). 2 more hospitals decide to merge in new york city.25. Juli.

The New York Times (1996b). A british company weighs buying MCI in $22 billiondeal. 02. November.

The New York Times (1996c). A merger of health insurers: The industry; managedcare empires in the making. 02. April.

The New York Times (1996d). There are good reasons for a wedding at the airport.5. Dezember.

The New York Times (1997a). A CVS and Revco merger would create a drugstoregiant. 28. Januar.

The New York Times (1997b). Integrated Health Services to buy Rotech. 08. Juli.

The New York Times (1998). As local papers merge, some ask: Will one size fitall? 11. Oktober.

The New York Times (1999a). Chevron and Phillips talks prompt a rash of rumors.21. September.

The New York Times (1999b). Small, local phone carriers go in search of bigsuitors. 15. September.

The New York Times (2000). Glaxo and SmithKline agree to form largest drug-maker. 17. Januar.

The New York Times (2003). New bidder tops US steel offer for national. 24.Januar.

The New York Times (2012). Random House and Penguin merger creates globalgiant. 30. Oktober.

The Philadelphia Inquirer (1998). Cheaper phone and tv rates: Why we are stillon hold the promises of a telecommunictions revolution have not materialized.29. Januar.

The Philadelphia Inquirer (2000). What analysts see for 2000: The year of the netmerger. 13. Februar.

The Washington Post (1992). HCA stock sale brings big payday; going publicagain enriches managers. 28. Februar.

Page 57: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

310 Literaturverzeichnis

The Washington Post (1995). For newspaper stocks, a summer to surge; mergers,plans to ease rules produce gains. 16. September.

The Washington Post (1997a). CVS and Revco explore merging into 2nd-biggestdrugstore chain. 28. Januar.

The Washington Post (1997b). Hotel chains plan $4.7 billion merger: Marriage ofdoubletree, promus continues industry’s consolidation. 03. September.

The Washington Post (1997c). A tsunami’s first ripples; takeovers of local stationshave had little effect on the air. So far. 25. Februar.

The Washington Post (1998a). Chrysler, Daimler consider merger; analysts saydeal would be good fit. 07. Mai.

The Washington Post (1998b). Megamerger would create phone giant; SBC-Ameritech deal would top MCI-WorldCom. 11. Mai.

The Washington Post (1999a). Merger rumors drive car show; in Detroit, dealdiscussions die hard despite denials. 06. Januar.

The Washington Post (1999b). US to allow Mobil deal with Exxon; Fairfax workersmay face relocation or buyout. 28. November.

The Washington Post (2000). Glaxo, SmithKline agree to merge; $76 billion dealwould create the world’s largest drug company. 18. Januar.

Tirole, Jean (1994). The theory of industrial organization. MIT Press, Cambridge,MA.

Tobin, James (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables.Econometrica, 26(1):24–36.

Tosi, Henry L., Werner, Steve, Katz, Jeffrey P., und Gomez-Mejia, Luis R. (2000).How much does performance matter? A meta-analysis of ceo pay studies. Journalof Management, 26(2):301–339.

Town, Robert J. (1992). Merger waves and the structure of merger and acquisitiontime-series. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 7(S1):S83–S100.

Toxvaerd, Flavio (2008). Strategic merger waves: A theory of musical chairs. Jour-nal of Economic Theory, 140(1):1–26.

Trautwein, Friedrich (1990). Merger motives and merger prescriptions. StrategicManagement Journal, 11(4):283–295.

Trillas, Francesc (2002). Mergers, acquisitions and control of telecommunicationsfirms in Europe. Telecommunications Policy, 26(5–6):269–286.

Page 58: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Literaturverzeichnis 311

Troger, Nils H. (2003). Mergers & Acquisitions im deutschen Bankensektor: EineAnalyse der Bestimmungsfaktoren. Dt. Univ.-Verlag, Wiesbaden.

Trueman, Brett (1994). Analyst forecasts and herding behavior. The Review ofFinancial Studies, 7(1):97–124.

Tukey, John W. (1962). The future of data analysis. The Annals of MathematicalStatistics, 33(1):1–67.

Tversky, Amos und Kahneman, Daniel (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heu-ristics and biases. Science, 185(4157):1124–1131.

Tversky, Amos und Kahneman, Daniel (1986). Rational choice and the framing ofdecisions. The Journal of Business, 59(4):S251–S278.

Umstead, David A. (1977). Forecasting stock market prices. The Journal of Fi-nance, 32(2):427–441.

Useem, Michael (1996). Investor capitalism: How money managers are changingthe face of corporate America. Basic Books, New York, NY.

Valentini, Giovanni (2012). Measuring the effect of M&A on patenting quantityand quality. Strategic Management Journal, 33(3):336–346.

Varian, Hal R. (2007). Grundzuge der Mikrookonomik. Oldenbourg, Munchen.

Vergoossen, Ruud G. A. (1993). The use and perceived importance of annualreports by investment analysts in the netherlands. European Accounting Review,2(2):219–243.

Vogel, Dieter H. (2002). M&A - Ideal und Wirklichkeit. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

von Stackelberg, Heinrich (1934). Marktform und Gleichgewicht. Verlag Wirtschaftund Finanzen, Dusseldorf.

Wahlen, James M., Baginski, Stephen P., und Bradshaw, Mark (2014). FinancialReporting, Financial Statement Analysis and Valuation: A Strategic Perspective.Cengage Learning, Boston, MA.

Walden, Eric und Browne, Glenn (2002). Information cascades in the adoptionof new technology. Working Paper 40, International Conference on InformationSystems.

Wall Street Journal (1998). Security-software market is razor sharp. 15. Mai.

Walsh, Paul, Craig, Russell, und Clarke, Frank (1991). ‘Big Bath Accounting’using extraordinary items adjustments: Australian empirical evidence. Journalof Business Finance & Accounting, 18(2):173–189.

Page 59: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

312 Literaturverzeichnis

Walter, Andreas (2002). Rationales Herdenverhalten bei externen Effekten. Shaker,Aachen.

Weiner, Christina (2005). The impact of industry classification schemes on financialresearch. Working paper, Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, Berlin.

Welch, Ivo (1992). Sequential sales, learning, and cascades. The Journal of Finance,47(2):695–732.

Welch, Ivo (2000). Herding among security analysts. Journal of Financial Econo-mics, 58(3):369–396.

Wentges, Paul (2002). Corporate Governance und Stakeholder-Ansatz: Implikatio-nen fur die betriebliche Finanzwirtschaft. Dt. Univ.-Verlag, Wiesbaden.

Wermers, Russ (1999). Mutual fund herding and the impact on stock prices. TheJournal of Finance, 54(2):581–622.

Weston, John F., Chung, Kwang S., und Hoag, Susan E. (1990). Mergers, restruc-turing, and corporate control. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Weston, John F. und Weaver, Samuel C. (2001). Mergers and Acquisitions.McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

White, Halbert (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimatorand a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4):817–838.

Wichels, Daniel (2002). Gestaltung der Kapitalmarktkommunikation mit Finanz-analysten: Eine empirische Untersuchung zum Informationsbedarf von Finanz-analysten in der Automobilindustrie. Dt. Univ.-Verlag, Wiesbaden.

Wiersema, Margarethe F. und Zhang, Yan (2011). CEO dismissal: The role ofinvestment analysts. Strategic Management Journal, 32(11):1161–1182.

Williamson, John P. (1988). The investment banking handbook. Wiley, New York,NY.

Williamson, Oliver E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust im-plications. Free Press, New York, NY.

Wirtz, Bernd W. (2003). Mergers & Acquisitions Management. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

Woginger, Helmut (2004). Das Synergy-Value-Konzept: Synergien bei Mergers &Acquisitions. Dt. Univ.-Verlag, Wiesbaden.

Womack, Kent L. (1996). Do brokerage analysts’ recommendations have investmentvalue? The Journal of Finance, 51(1):137–167.

Page 60: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

Literaturverzeichnis 313

Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and PanelData. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Wrigley, Neil (2001). The consolidation wave in US food retailing: A europeanperspective. Agribusiness, 17(4):489–513.

Wu, De-Min (1973). Alternative tests of independence between stochastic regres-sors and disturbances. Econometrica, 41(4):733–750.

Wubben, Bernd (2007a). German Mergers & Acquisitions in the USA: Transactionmanagement and success. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

Wubben, Bernd (2007b). German Mergers & Acquisitions in the USA: Transactionmanagement and success. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

Yermack, David (1995). Do corporations award CEO stock options effectively?Journal of Financial Economics, 39(2–3):237–269.

Youssef, Mouna und Rajhi, Mohamed T. (2009). Determinants of herding behavioramong financial analysts: A study of french listed firms. International Journalof Business and Management, 4(9):121–130.

Zeckhauser, Richard, Patel, Jayendu, und Hendricks, Darryll (1991). Nonrationalactors and financial market behavior. Theory and Decision, 31(2):257–287.

Zhang, X. Frank (2006). Information uncertainty and analyst forecast behavior.Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(2):565–590.

Zheng, Lu (1999). Is money smart? A study of mutual fund investors’ fund selectionability. The Journal of Finance, 54(3):901–933.

Zhu, Bingyu (2009). Rationales Herdenverhalten und seine Auswirkungen auf In-vestitionsentscheidungen. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

Zoern, Alexander (1994). Motive fur nationale Unternehmensakquisitionen deut-scher und englischer Unternehmen. Hampp, Munchen.

Zorn, Dirk, Dobbin, Frank, Dierkes, Julian, und Kwok, Man S. (2004). Mana-ging investors: How financial markets reshaped the american firm. In: Cetina,Karin K. und Preda, Alexandru (Hrsg.), The Sociology of Financial Markets.Oxford University Press, London, UK, 269–289.

zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, Dodo, Mirow, Michael, und Schweizer, Lars (2011). Therole of financial analysts in the strategy formation process of business firms.Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(4):1153–1187.

Zuckerman, Ezra W. (1999). The categorical imperative: Securities analysts andthe illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5):1398–1438.

Page 61: Anhang978-3-658-14582...“, Brian Adamik, Ana-lyst bei Yankee Group (The Philadelphia Inquirer, 1998). 4841 Kabel- und Pay-TV ” Exactly what’s happening in the Bay Area [consolidation

314 Literaturverzeichnis

Zuckerman, Ezra W. (2000). Focusing the corporate product: Securities analystsand de-diversification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3):591–619.

Zwahlen, Beat (1994). Motive und Gefahrenpotentiale bei einer Unternehmensak-quisition: Eine erfolgreiche Akquisitions- und Integrationsstrategie einer multi-nationalen Unternehmung am Fallbeispiel Nestle-Rowntree. Dissertation, Uni-versitat Zurich, Zurich.