approaches for validating automatic analytic tool results on social networking data for its...
TRANSCRIPT
web
Approaches for valida&ng automa&c Analy&c Tool Results on Social Networking Data for its
Exploita9on within Poli9cians' everyday Workflow
CONTACT: Timo Wandhoefer ([email protected])
- EU research project: www.wegov-‐project.eu - Enriching the dialogue of ci1zens and
poli1cs on the web – build-‐up on Social Networking Sites instead of launching a new ePar1cipa1on pla=orm
- 7th framework programme theme ICT 2009.7.3 ICT for Governance and Policy Modeling
- Consor9um:
WeGov – Where eGovernment meets the eSociety
Research Ques9ons - What is the relevance of
automa9c analy9c tool results? - How many documents needed? - Can automa9c analy9c tools
replace or expand presswork? - Can results be used for e-‐
par9cipa9on?
Approach - Presswork [B] is “gold standard” - Maximize the data base [C] - Comparing [A] vs. [B] - Different geographical layers:
Germany, ci9es, cons9tuencies
[B] presswork
Method - Content analysis: planning –
development – evalua9on phase - Feedback group - Poli9cians: Parliamentary offices
Data - Documents: topics, profiles,
comments - Linguis9c corpora: Facebook
groups, Twiger, blogs, online newspaper
Results? - What is the different [A] vs. [B]?
[A] automa9c analysis
[C]