assessing assessment

45
ASSESSING ASSESSMENT: ASSESSING ASSESSMENT: TEN MYTHS TO TEN MYTHS TO CONSIDER AND CONSIDER AND RECONSIDER. RECONSIDER. Presented by Presented by Safir Kassim B Safir Kassim B University of Mascara University of Mascara

Upload: slideshareknow

Post on 12-Apr-2017

450 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Assessing assessment

ASSESSING ASSESSMENT:ASSESSING ASSESSMENT: TEN MYTHS TO TEN MYTHS TO CONSIDER AND CONSIDER AND RECONSIDER.RECONSIDER.

Presented byPresented by

Safir Kassim BSafir Kassim BUniversity of MascaraUniversity of Mascara

Page 2: Assessing assessment

Assessment is simply a story of paradoxes, a history of contradictions and a series of

impassable biases. It is a slippery zone

where every assessor "should" be scientifically "objective" but human,

superhumanly «fair" in a world where to err is human.

 

Page 3: Assessing assessment

MYTH 1MYTH 1: ASSESSMENT IS AN : ASSESSMENT IS AN EXACT SCIENCE EXACT SCIENCE

Page 4: Assessing assessment

And thus:• Reliable• Valid• Objective• Fair

Page 5: Assessing assessment

It’s simply a myth …Why?

• “Assessment is inherently an INEXACT science” (Cohen et al,2005:75)

• “L’évaluation n’est PAS une science exact” (Perrenoud, 2003:128)

• « An assessment is rarely totally valid or totally reliable » (Norton, 2008:6)

Page 6: Assessing assessment

MYTH 2: MYTH 2: “ASSESSMENT” CAN BE “ASSESSMENT” CAN BE CLEARLY DEFINEDCLEARLY DEFINED

Page 7: Assessing assessment

Let’s consider these definitions:

“any method used to better understand the current knowledge that a student

possesses”.

Page 8: Assessing assessment

But :

– What kind of knowledge ?

– Is it knowledge or know-how?

– Knowledge or “know-where”?

– Have we got the tools to “assess” that knowledge?

Page 9: Assessing assessment

“ Assesment is the act of evaluating, appraising,

and/or estimating the features, qualities, performances,

and needs of individuals, programs, and institution”

(Board of Edu,April,2004)

Page 10: Assessing assessment

But, again: - What kind of performance ?

• Linguistic?• Paralinguistic?• Procedural?• Needs? … (semantic haziness)

Page 11: Assessing assessment

We are trying to define the We are trying to define the INDEFINABLEINDEFINABLE

We are trying to “measure” We are trying to “measure” the the UNQUANTIFIABLEUNQUANTIFIABLE

Page 12: Assessing assessment

MYTH 3: MYTH 3: TEACHERS SHOULD TEACHERS SHOULD ASSESS THE WAY THEY HAVE ASSESS THE WAY THEY HAVE

BEEN ASSESSED BEEN ASSESSED (since it works…)(since it works…)

Page 13: Assessing assessment

This is the SIMPLEST assessment strategy teachers

should

UNLEARN

Middle and secondary school teachers are often

RELUCTANT to read and learn about assessment .

Because :

Page 14: Assessing assessment

• Feel psychologically “safer” in their traditional approach

• Are often “lost” in the digital ocean of information

• Don’t know what to read

Page 15: Assessing assessment

MYTH 4: MYTH 4: BOOKS ARE BOOKS ARE SUFFICIENT TO LEARN BOUT SUFFICIENT TO LEARN BOUT

ASSESSMENTASSESSMENT

Page 16: Assessing assessment

This is not the case in our universities …

Why? :

Page 17: Assessing assessment

-Scientifically irrelevant

since

DECONTEXTUALISED

Page 18: Assessing assessment

Three major issues are missing:

• e-assessment• 21st century assessment• Balanced assessment

Page 19: Assessing assessment

MYTH 5: MYTH 5: TRADITIONAL TRADITIONAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS CAN ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS CAN

MEET THE NEEDS OF MEET THE NEEDS OF THE “ THE “DIGITAL DIGITAL

LEARNERSLEARNERS””

Page 20: Assessing assessment

We are in a situation We are in a situation where old minds have to where old minds have to

teach young minds…teach young minds…

Page 21: Assessing assessment

Teachers and students have to face the

new paradigm shifts in education. I.e.:

Page 22: Assessing assessment

20th CENTURY 21st CENTURY

STAKEHOLDERS teacher co-learner

learner e-learner

TOOLS books e-books

assessment e-assessment

PROCESSES disciplinary interdisciplinary

APPROACHES constructivism CONNECTIVISM

Page 23: Assessing assessment

MYTH 6: MYTH 6: A ONE-SIZE-FEETS-ALL A ONE-SIZE-FEETS-ALL ASSESSMENT CAN GUARANTEE ASSESSMENT CAN GUARANTEE

EQUITYEQUITY

Page 24: Assessing assessment

Are we assessing everybody (assessees)?

“NOOOO”, say experts in assessment.We are assessing a MINORITY

Page 25: Assessing assessment

-The reading/writing learners

- The intrapersonal (who prefer working alone)

Page 26: Assessing assessment

Why?:

Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligenceS

Fleming’s theory of learners styleS

Page 27: Assessing assessment

The pencil-and- paper-based assessment is an

excellent tool

to meet those two types of learners, yet the

worst way to assesss

the rest of the classroom. I.e.: The MAJORITY

Page 28: Assessing assessment

Is this fairness?

Page 29: Assessing assessment

MYTH 7: “MYTH 7: “GOOGLE GOOGLE GENERATION” NEEDS ROTE GENERATION” NEEDS ROTE

LEARNINGLEARNING

Page 30: Assessing assessment

Rote learning can be a good strategy to memorise :

Key datesMnemonicsQuotationsPoetryOral traditional texts

Page 31: Assessing assessment

Yet:• Memorising facts is waste of time since

information is readily available within a mere mouse click away

• Rote learning kills creativity• It is lower order thinking vs. higher order thinking• learning today is SOCIAL (connectivism) vs.

individual / intrapersonal ( behaviourism).

Page 32: Assessing assessment

MYTH 8: MYTH 8: TEACHERS « MUST » TEACHERS « MUST » USE RED PENS WHEN USE RED PENS WHEN

CORRECTINGCORRECTING

Page 33: Assessing assessment

Researchers, psychopedagogues and teachers around the world agree on these:

• Red is an AGGRESSIVE way to say “WRONG !!!”

• It damaged the psyche of students (self-esteem and motivation…)

• Too much red “bleeds off” the paper• Red is a sign of authoritarianism (I am

the judge)

Page 34: Assessing assessment

Do you know that :

In Queensland (Australia) teachers are not allowed to write in red pen

ANYMORE because apparently it stresses the kids out and make them depressed

and angry. (?)

Page 35: Assessing assessment

The world is changing, what about us?

Page 36: Assessing assessment

MYTH 9 : MYTH 9 : FORMATIVE AND FORMATIVE AND SUMMATIVE ASESSMENTS ARE SUMMATIVE ASESSMENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO SUFFICIENT TO EVALUATE THE LEARNERSEVALUATE THE LEARNERS

Page 37: Assessing assessment

Consider these:

Page 38: Assessing assessment

TRADITIONAL ASSESMENT 21 st century ASSESMENT

1. The teacher is THE ASSESSOR 1.Learners can assess other

learners (PEER ASSESMENT)

Learners assess THEMSELVES (IPSATIVE ASSESSMENT)

2. Paper-and –pencil assessment 2 a. OPEN-BOOK EXAM (safer) b. Authentic assessment (real )

3. More concerned with “teaching to the test”

3. Teaching to produce “life-long learners”

4. Teach to assess 4. ASSESS TO TEACH AND LEARN

Page 39: Assessing assessment

MYTH 10: MYTH 10: MARKS OR GRADES MARKS OR GRADES “MUST” BE DISPLAYED “MUST” BE DISPLAYED

PUBLICLYPUBLICLY

Page 40: Assessing assessment

YES, it is:

“TRANSPARENCY “

But:

There is a significant body of evidence that insist on these:

Page 41: Assessing assessment

• Teachers should always accentuate the positive. We can lose those suffering from “LOW SELF-ESTEEM”

• Should avoid criticism. Displaying marks publicly is the BEST way

• to DEMOTIVATE a boy or a girl

• For low achievers, publicising marks is simply a PUBLIC HUMILIATION

Page 42: Assessing assessment

It is a NON VERBAL VIOLENCE that could be decoded as :

-I am bad at ….

-My progress will be a miracle (05/20)

-I should prepare myself to another PUBLIC HUMILIATION (SELF-PROPHECY)

Page 43: Assessing assessment

EXCELLENCE, BADNESS, EXCELLENCE, BADNESS, AND GOODNESS ARE AND GOODNESS ARE

JUST RELATIVE JUST RELATIVE JUDGMENTAL NOTIONS…JUDGMENTAL NOTIONS…

Page 44: Assessing assessment

Towards an individualized, humanised, balanced

e-assessment?We hope so…

Page 45: Assessing assessment

100 THNKS 4 UR A10SHN 100 THNKS 4 UR A10SHN

Safir kassim BoudjelalSafir kassim BoudjelalUniversity of MascaraUniversity of Mascara

[email protected]@yahoo.com