‘attaining sustainable services from ecosystems through trade-off scenarios (espa assets...
DESCRIPTION
Multidisciplinary Research Week 2013 at the University of Southampton. #MDRWeek. World Water Day and International Year of Water Cooperation 2013. ‘Attaining Sustainable Services from Ecosystems through Trade-off Scenarios (ESPA ASSETS project)’, Presentation by Dr Kate Schreckenberg, University of Southampton. See the latest videos, interviews, pictures, tweets and views from the floor at: www.southampton.ac.uk/multidisciplinaryTRANSCRIPT
Multidisciplinary Research Week 2013
World Water Day: Water Cooperation
‘Attaining Sustainable Services from Ecosystems through Trade-off Scenarios (ESPA ASSETS project)’,
by Dr Kate Schreckenberg, University of Southampton
Photo by Erwin Palacios (CI Colombia) © The Economist
2
Photo by Erwin Palacios (CI Colombia)
To quantify the linkages between ecosystem services that affect – and are affected by – food security and nutritional health for the rural poor at the forest-agricultural interface
United Kingdom:
University of Southampton (PI Poppy) University of Dundee (Dawson)
United States of America:
Conservation International (Co-PI Honzak)
Spain:
Basque Centre for Climate Change (Co-PI Villa)
Colombia:
International Centre for Tropical Agriculture – CIAT (Co-PI Jarvis) Research centres, universities and NGOs
Malawi:
Chancellor College (Co-PI Chiotha) LEAD Southern and Eastern Africa plus Ministry of
Forestry, Forest Research Institute of Malawi WorldFish Centre - Malawi Rhodes University South Africa
High forest cover Low deforestation
High forest cover High deforestation
Low forest cover Low deforestation
Lower Caquetá, Colombia
Third site, Latin America
Zomba Plateau, Malawi
Natural land use transition Forest replenishment period
National
Long-Term
Regional
Medium-Term
Crises and Tipping Points Theme 2
Environmental Impacts
Food Security
Health Impact
Economic Impacts
Policies relating to e.g. economics, sector-specific,
environmental Theme 3
BowTie: risk management / mitigation
Theme 3
Food Security and Health Themes 1 and 2
Ecosystem Services Themes 1 and 2
Setting of targets / priorities
Drivers / Pressures State Impacts
FeedMe
Socioeconomic surveys and PRA
Response
ARIES Ecosystem service flows to
beneficiaries
Economic modelling
ES modelling
Local
Short-Term
The framework integrates the modelling tools and the DP-SIR approach to evaluate drivers, pressures and impact on ES over multiple spatial and temporal scales.
Theme 1 Drivers, pressures and linkages between food security, nutritional health and ecosystem services
Photo by Malcolm Hudson (U. of Southampton)
• Direct and indirect contributions of ecosystem services
• Key drivers and pressures
Household surveys and food diaries.
Three or more waves of measurements per site.
Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing.
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
Poverty Food Security
Theme 2 Crises and tipping points: Past, present and future interactions between food insecurity and ES at the forest-agricultural interface.
• Coping strategies
• Future scenarios http://blogs.reuters.com
/p
hotographers-
blog/201
0/0
8/1
2/an
-
aerial-view
-of-su
matra-
island/
Photo by Simon Willcock (U. of Southampton)
• 3 key interactions: Water, Forest & People
PEOPLE FOREST
WATER
A rapid spatial assessment tool for ecosystem services and their values; not a single model but an artificial intelligence assisted system that customizes models to user goals.
Demonstrates a mapping process for ecosystem service provision, use, sink and flow while most ES assessments only look at provision.
Probabilistic, Bayesian models inform decision-makers about the likelihood of possible scenarios; users can explore effects of policy changes and external events on estimates of uncertainty.
Theme 3 The science-policy interface: How can we manage ES to reduce food insecurity and increase nutritional health?
Photo by Simon Willcock (U. of Southampton)
•Minimising risk of future environmental change
•Influencing policy to better manage ES conflicts, trade-offs and synergies to sustain food security and health?
Ecosystem – Natural Forest
Good/Service – Firewood
Consequence – Increased
Food Security
Hazard – Not enough Firewood
Threat – Over collection
Consequence –
Decreased Food Security
Control – Rules preventing
over-harvesting
Control – Aid/Charcoal provision
Better resource
management
Food security and nutritional
health
Map different factors affecting ES
Report on climate change impacts on ES provision, food security and nutritional health
Identify critical changes and tipping points that can accelerate the degradation of key ecosystems (that can be addressed through timely policy interventions)
Report on current and future impact of land use change on sustainable provision of ES and food security
Identify the factors with highest negative impact on ES (and which are more relevant for food security and nutritional health)
Provide input for policies that can counterbalance the most urgent needs of the population exerting pressure on ES
18
This presentation was produced by ASSETS (NE-J002267-1), funded with support from the Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation Programme (ESPA).
The ESPA programme is funded by the Department for International Development (DFID), the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the
Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), as part of the UK’s Living with Environmental Change Programme (LWEC). The views expressed here are
those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the funders, the ESPA Programme, the ESPA Directorate, or LWEC.
Website: www.southampton.ac.uk/multidisciplinary
Blog: http://blog.soton.ac.uk/multidisciplinary/tag/mdrweek/
Follow us on Twitter @Multisoton #MDRWeek
See the latest videos, interviews, pictures, tweets and views from the floor at:
Youtube: Search #MDRWeek
World Water Day: Water Cooperation Multidisciplinary Research Week 2013