b. sazdovic - noncommutativity and t-duality
DESCRIPTION
The SEENET-MTP Workshop BW2011Particle Physics from TeV to Plank Scale28 August – 1 September 2011, Donji Milanovac, SerbiaTRANSCRIPT
Noncommutativity and T-duality
Lj. Davidovic, B. Nikolic and B. SazdovicInstitute of Physics, Belgrade, Serbia
• We will discuss relation between
– Open string parameters
Geffµν (G, B) and θµν(G, B)
– and T-dual background fields
?Gµν(G, B) and ?Bµν(G, B)
as functions of the initial background fields:
metric tensor Gµν and Kalb-Ramond field Bµν
• Noncommutativity of Dp-brane world volume
The quantization of the open bosonic string whose ends
are attached to the Dp-brane leads to noncommutativity of
Dp-brane world volume
The noncommutativity parameter θµν(G, B)
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
• Effective theory
On the solution of boundary conditions the initial theory
turns to the effective one with effective metric tensor
Geffµν (G, B) and vanishing effective Kalb-Ramond field
• T-duality
T-duality in presence of background fields leads T-dual
background fields ?Gµν(G, B) and ?Bµν(G, B)
• We will extend these investigations considering
1. II B superstring theory instead of bosonic one
– Bosonic duality
– Fermionic duality
2. ”Weakly curved background” Bµν[x] = bµν + 13Bµνρxρ
instead of the flat one Bµν = bµν = const.
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
1
The action
describing the open string propagation in curved background
S = κ
Z
Σ
d2ξp−ghgαβ
2Gµν(x)+
εαβ
√−gBµν(x)
i∂αx
µ∂βx
ν,
• xµ(ξ), µ = 0, 1, ..., D − 1 the coordinates of the
D-dimentional space-time
• ξα(ξ0 = τ, ξ1 = σ) parametrize 2-dim world-sheet
• gαβ(ξ) intrinsic world-sheet metric (g = detgαβ)
• background fields
– Gµν(x) space-time metric
– Bµν(x) Kalb-Ramond antisymmetric field
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
2
Action principle for string
Evolution from the initial to final configuration is such that the
action is stationary
S =R τf
τidτR σf
σidσL(xµ, xµ, x′µ, gαβ)
δS =
Zdτdσ
h ∂L∂xµ
− ∂τ
∂L∂xµ
− ∂σ
∂L∂xµ
iδx
µ
+
Zdτh ∂L∂xµ
δxµi
σ=π
σ=0
From the action principle we get
1) equation of motion
xµ = x′′µ − 2Bµνρx
νx′ρ,
Bµνρ = ∂µBνρ + ∂νBρµ + ∂ρBµν is field strength
2) boundary condition
γµ0 δxµ
σ=0,π
= 0, γµ0 ≡ ∂L
∂xµ = x′µ − 2(G−1B)µνx
ν
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
3
The Boundary conditions
• The closed string fulfills the boundary condition because
xµ(0) = xµ(π)
• For the open string we can impose
1) Neumann boundary condition
hδxµi
0,
hδxµi
π
are arbitrary i.e. string end-points can move freely
γ0µ
σ=0
= 0, γ0µ
σ=π
= 0
2) Dirichlet boundary condition
hδxµi
σ=0= 0,
hδxµi
σ=π= 0
The edges of the string are fixed
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
4
Noncommutativity and effective theorybosonic open string in flat space-time I
• We impose Neumann boundary conditions
• We treat boundary conditions as constraints
• Constraint γ0µ must be conserved in time
– Secundary constraint γ1µ = γ0
µ
– Infinite set of constraints γnµ = γn−1
µ , (n = 1, 2, · · ·)
– Two σ-dependent constraints
Γµ(σ) ≡P∞n=0
σn
(n)!γµn
σ=0
Γµ(σ) ≡P∞n=0
(σ−π)n
(n)! γµn
σ=π
• 2π-periodicity xµ(σ) = xµ(σ + 2π)
solve constraint at σ = π Γµ(σ) = 0 → Γµ(σ) = 0
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
5
Noncommutativity and effective theorybosonic open string in flat space-time II
• Solving the constraints
– In canonical formalism
Γµ(σ), Γν(σ) = −κGEµνδ′(σ − σ)
For GEµν 6= 0 Γµ(σ) are SSC
– Introduce world-sheet parity Ω
Ω : σ → −σ, Ωxµ(σ) → xµ(−σ)
and new variables
qµ = 12(1 + Ω)xµ qµ = 1
2(1− Ω)xµ
– Solve Ω odd parts in terms of Ω even
∗ q = f1(q, p), p = f2(q, p)
∗ xµ = qµ − 2θµνR
dσ1pν, πµ = pµ
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
5
• Effective action and background fields
– Seff = κR
d2ξ12η
αβGEµν∂αqµ∂βqν
– Gµν → Geffµν = GE
µν, Bµν → Beffµν = 0
GEµν ≡ [G− 4BG−1B]µν
effective metric
• Noncommuatativity
Xµ(σ), Xν(σ) = θµν
8<:−1 σ, σ = 0
1 σ, σ = π
0 otherwise
.
θµν ≡ −2κ(G
−1E BG−1)µν
non-commutativity parameter
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
6
T0-duality of closed string– trivial background
• Background:
– One spatial dimension is curled up into circle
– Remaining dimensions are described as
Minkowski space-time
– All others background fields vanish, Bµν = 0, Φ = 0
• – x25(σ + π) = x25(σ) + 2πRm, (m ∈ Z)
– m– winding number
• Consequences of compactification:
– Momentum along circle is quantized, p = nR (n ∈ Z),
Lost some states– New states that wrap around circle arise, winding states
Gained some states
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
7
Surprising symmetry as stringy property
• Mass square of the states
M2 = n2
R2 + m2R2
α′2+ contributions from oscilators
• – Complementary behavior of
momentum and winding states
– M2(R, n, m) = M2(α′R , m, n)
– R ←→ α′R ≡ R, n ←→ m, R — Dual radius
• T0 duality for closed string
Compactification with radius R
is physically indistinguishable fromCompactification with radius R = α′
R
• T0 dual coordinate
– Equation of motion
∂+∂−x = 0 =⇒ x = x+(τ + σ) + x−(τ − σ)
– T0 dual coordinate
x ≡ x+(τ + σ)− x−(τ − σ)
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
8
T-duality – nontrivial background I
• – Background fields are independent of the circular
coordinate
– We take all coordinate to be circular
→ Gµν, Bµν = const
Toroidal duality of all cordinates
• Lagrange multiplier method
?S[y, v+, v−] =
κ
Zd
2ξv
µ+(B + 1
2G)µνvν− +
Zd
2ξyµ(∂+v
µ−− ∂−v
µ+),
– yµ – Lagrange multiplier
• Integration over y returns to the original action
∂+vµ− − ∂−vµ
+ = 0 ⇒ vµ± = ∂±xµ
• Integrating out vector field v±
vµ±(y) = −2[θµν ∓ 1
κ(G−1E )µν]∂±yν
GEµν ≡ [G− 4BG−1B]µν, θµν ≡ −2
κ(G−1E BG−1)µν
are the open string background fields:
effective metric and non-commutativity parameter
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
9
T-duality–nontrivial background II
• ?S[∂+y, ∂−y] = 2R
d2ξ∂+yµ[θµν + 1
κ(G−1E )µν]∂+yµ
= κR
d2ξ∂+yµ(?B + 1
2
?G)µν∂+yµ
• Dual background fields
?Bµν = 2κθµν, ?Gµν = (2
κ)2(G−1
E )µν
• Turn off background fields
– Bµν → 0, Gµν → (ηµν, G25,25 = G), κ → 2α′
– 2πR =R 2π
0ds =
√GR 2π
0dθ = 2π
√G
⇒ G = R2, ?G = R2
– ?G = α′2G−1 ⇒ RR = α′
– ∂±x = ±∂±y ⇒ y = x
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
10
Relation between T-duality, effective theoryand noncommuatativity
• T-duality
?Gµν = α′2G−1µνE , ?Bµν = α′θµν
• Effective theory
Geffµν = GE
µν /
• Noncommuatativity
/ θµν
• The same background fields: effective metric
– GEµν ≡ [G− 4BG−1B]µν
and non-commutativity parameter
θµν ≡ −2κ(G
−1E BG−1)µν
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
11
Type II B theory
• Type IIB theory in pure spinor formulation
S = κ
Z
Σd2ξ
1
2η
mnGµν + ε
mnBµν
∂mx
µ∂nx
ν
+
Z
Σd2ξ
−πα∂−(θ
α+ Ψ
αµx
µ) + ∂+(θ
α+ Ψ
αµx
µ)πα +
1
2κπαF
αβπβ
• Variables
xµ, θα and θα
• Background fields
– NS-NS Gµν, Bµν
– NS-R Ψαµ, Ψα
µ , gravitinos
– R-R F αβ ∼ A0, A2, A4, dA4-self dual
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
12
Type II B theoryNeumann boundary conditions
• Boundary conditions
hγ
(0)i δx
i+παδθ
α+ δθ
απα
i π
0= 0
γ(0)i = Π+i
jI−j + Π−i
jI+j +
παΨ
αi + Ψ
αi πα
• For bosonic coordinates Neumann boundary conditions
γ(0)i
π0
= 0
• Fermionic coordinates preserves N=1 SUSY
(θα − θ
α)π
0= 0 ⇒ (πα1
− πα1)π0
= 0
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
13
Type II B theoryNeumann b. c., Effective theory and non-commutativity
B.Nikolic and B. Sazdovic, Phys. Lett. B666 (2008) 400
B. Nikolic and B. Sazdovic, Nucl. Phys. B 836 (2010) 100
• Similar method as in bosonic case
• Background fields
– Ω even corresponds to Type I
Gµν → GEµν
1
2Ψ
α+µ → (ΨE)
αµ =
1
2Ψ
α+µ + (BG
−1Ψ−)
αµ
Fαβa → F
αβE = F
αβ − (Ψ−G−1
Ψ−)αβ
– Ω odd fields vanish Bµν → 0, Ψ− → 0, Fs → 0
• Non-commutativity
Ω odd fields are source of non-commutativity
xµ(σ) , x
ν(σ) = 2θ
µνθ(σ + σ)
xµ(σ) , θ
α(σ) = −θ
µαθ(σ + σ)
θα(σ) , θ
β(σ) =
1
2θ
αβθ(σ + σ)
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
14
Type II B theoryBosonic TIIBb-dulity
• Action has global shift symmetry in bosonic direction
Similar method produce dual background fields
?Gµν = α′2G−1µνE , ?Bµν = α′θµν
?ψaµ− = −2G−1µν
E (ψE)aν
?ψaµ+ = 2κθaµ
?F aba = F ab
E + 4(ψaEG−1
E ψbE) ?F ab
s = 2κθab
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
15
Relation between T-duality, effective theoryand noncommuatativity
Type II B and bosonic duality
• T-duality Effective theory Noncommuatativity
Bosonic N bc Ω-symm Ω-antisymm
• ?Gµν = α′2G−1µνE Geff
µν = GEµν /
?Bµν = α′θµν / θµν
• ?ψaµ− = −2(G−1
E ψE)aµ (ψeff)aµ = (ψE)a
µ /
?ψaµ+ = 2κθaµ / θaµ
• ?F aba = F ab
E + 4(ψaEG−1
E ψbE) F ab
eff = F abE /
?F abs = 2κθab / θab
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
16
Type II B theoryFermionic TIIBf -dulity
B. Nikolic and B. Sazdovic
Fermionic T-duality and momenta noncommutativity
hep-th/1103.4520
to be published in Phys. Rev. D
• Fermionic T-duality —
Duality with respect to fermionic variables θa, θa
– Suppose that action has a global shift symmetry in
θα and θα directions
– Similar procedure as in bosonic case produces
TIIBf dual background fields:
?Bµν = Bµν +
h(ΨF
−1Ψ)µν − (ΨF
−1Ψ)νµ
i
?Gµν = Gµν + 2
h(ΨF
−1Ψ)µν + (ΨF
−1Ψ)νµ
i
?Ψαµ = 4(F
−1Ψ)αµ ,
?Ψµα = −4(ΨF
−1)µα
?Fαβ = 16(F
−1)αβ
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
17
Type II B theoryFermionic TIIBf -dulity and Dirichlet boundary conditions I
• T-duality Effective theory and Noncommuatativity
BOSONIC ←→ Neumann b.c. for xµ
. SUSY b.c. for θa, θa
FERMIONIC ←→ ? b.c.
• DIRICHLET boundary conditions
xµπ
0= 0, θ
απ
0= 0, θ
απ
0= 0
• Solve constraints
– odd variables are independent– trivial solution for coordinates, non-trivial for momenta
xµ(σ) = q
µ(σ) , πµ = pµ−2κBµν q
′ν−1
2Ψ
αµ(η
′a)α+
1
2(η′a)αΨ
αµ
θα(σ) = θ
αa (σ) , πα = pα −
1
2(η′a)α
θα(σ) = θ
αa (σ) , πα = ˜pα −
1
2(η′a)α
where
(ηa)α ≡ 4κ(F−1
)αβ(θβa+Ψ
βµq
µ) , (ηa)α ≡ 4κ(θ
βa+Ψ
βµq
µ)(F
−1)βα
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
18
Type II B theoryNon-commutativity relations
• Non-commutativity relations
Pµ(σ),Pν(σ)D = Θµν∆(σ + σ) ,
Pµ(σ),Pα(σ)D = Θµα∆(σ + σ) ,Pµ(σ), Pα(σ)
D= Θαµ∆(σ + σ) ,Pα(σ), Pβ(σ)
D
= Θαβ∆(σ + σ) ,
Pα(σ),Pβ(σ)D =Pα(σ), Pβ(σ)
D
= 0 ,
where the noncommutativity parameters are
Θµν = 2κ?Bµν , Θµα =
κ
2
?Ψµα
Θαµ = −κ
2
?Ψαµ , Θαβ = −κ
8
?Fβα ,
and
PA(σ) =
Z σ
0
dσ1πA(σ1) A = µ, a, a
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
19
Relation between T-duality, effective theoryand noncommuatativityType II B and fermionic duality
• T-duality Γa, Γb Pa,Pb
• ?Gµν?Gµν /
?Bµν / θµν = 2κ?Bµν
• ?ψaµ12
?ψaµ θaµ = −κ2
?ψaµ
?ψµa12
?ψµa θµa = κ2
?ψµa
• ?Fab − 18
?Fab θab = −κ8
?Fab
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
20
Bosonic string in weakly curved background
• The consistency of the theory
– Quantum world-sheet conformal invariance
– produce conditions on background fields
space-time equations of motion
Rµν −1
4BµρσB
ρσν = 0 ,
DρBρµν = 0
– Bµνρ = ∂µBνρ + ∂νBρµ + ∂ρBµν is a field strength
– Rµν and Dµ Ricci tensor and covariant derivative
• We will consider the following particular solution
Gµν = const, Bµν[x] = bµν +1
3Bµνρx
ρ,
– bµν is constant
– Bµνρ is constant and infinitesimally small
• – We will work up to the first order in Bµνρ
– Ricci tensor Rµν is an infinitesimal of the second order
and as such is neglected
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
21
T-duality of weakly curved background (Twcb)
Lj. Davidovic and B. Sazdovic
T-duality in the weakly curved background
in preparation
• More complicated procedure then in flat background
?Gµν = α′2G−1µνE (?x), ?Bµν = α′θµν(?x)
?x is Twcb of x and y is T0 dual of y
?x = g−1(2by + y)
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
22
Effective theory and non-commutativity inweakly curved background
Lj. Davidovic and B. SazdovicPhys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 066014
Lj. Davidovic and B. Sazdovic,
Non-commutativity parameters depend not only on the effective
coordinate but on its T-dual as well
hep-th/1106.1064
to be published in JHEP
• Similar procedure but much more complicated calculation
• Effective background fields
Geffµν (u) = GE
µν(u), Beffµν = −κ
2(gθ(u)g)µν
u = q + 2bq
• Non-commutativity parameter
– Nontrivial both at string endpoints and at string interior
– Depends on the σ-integral of the effective momenta
Pµ(σ) =R σ
0dηpµ(η)
which is in fact T0-dual of the effective coordinate,
Pµ = κgµνqν.
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011
23
Relation between Twcb-duality, effective theoryand noncommuatativity
• Twcb-duality Effective theory Noncommuatativity
Dual background fields
?Gµν = α′2G−1µνE (?x) Geff
µν = GEµν(u) /
?Bµν = α′θµν(?x) / θµν(v)
Dual variables
?x = g−1(2by+y) u = q+2bq v = q− 3πbQcm
Noncommutativity and T-duality BSW 2011