bakterial sinusitis

Upload: riris-arizka-wahyu-kumala

Post on 14-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Bakterial Sinusitis

    1/4

    Dalam keadaan fisiologis sinus biasanya steril. Secret yang diproduksi dalam sinus dialirkan ke

    rongga hidung oleh silia. Pada individu yang sehat, aliran secret dari sinus selalu searah, hal ini

    untuk mencegah kembalinya secret ke sinus. Saat terjadi edema pada mukosa maka ostium akan

    tersumbat yang kemudian menyebabkan obstruksi aliran saluran secret dengan tekanan negative,

    yang mengarah pada infeksi bakteri.

    Retained mucus, when infected, leads to sinusitis. Another mechanism hypothesizes that because

    the sinuses are continuous with the nasal cavity, colonized bacteria in the nasopharynx may

    contaminate the otherwise sterile sinuses. These bacteria are usually removed by mucociliary

    clearance; thus, if mucociliary clearance is altered, bacteria may be inoculated and infection may

    occur, leading to sinusitis. ( Cherry et al, 2004)

    Data are available that support the fact that healthy sinuses are colonized. The bacterial flora of

    noninflamed sinuses were studied for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in 12 adults who underwent

    corrective surgery for septal deviation.Organisms were recovered from all aspirates, with an

    average of 4 isolates per sinus aspirate. The predominant anaerobic isolates were Prevotella,

    Porphyromonas, Fusobacterium andPeptostreptococcus species. The most common aerobic

    bacteria were S pyogenes, S aureus, S pneumonia, andH influenzae. In another study, specimens

    were processed for aerobic bacteria only, and Staphylococcus species and alpha-hemolytic

    streptococci were isolated. Organisms were recovered in 20% of maxillary sinuses of patients

    who underwent surgical repositioning of the maxilla. (Brook et al, 2013)

    In contrast, another report of aspirates of 12 volunteers with no sinus disease showed no bacterial

    growth. Jiang et al evaluated the bacteriology of maxillary sinuses with normal endoscopic

    findings. Organisms were recovered from 14 (47%) of 30 swab specimens and 7 (41%) of 17 of

    mucosal specimens. Gordts et al reported the microbiology of the middle meatus in normal

    adults and children. This study noted in 52 patients that 75% had bacterial isolates present, most

    commonly coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) (35%), Corynebacteriumspecies (23%),and S aureus (8%) in adults. Low numbers of these species were present. In children, the most

    common organisms wereH influenzae (40%),M catarrhalis (34%), and S pneumoniae (50%), a

    marked difference from findings in adults. Nonhemolytic streptococci andMoraxella species

    were absent in adults.

  • 7/29/2019 Bakterial Sinusitis

    2/4

    The frequent involvement of anaerobes in chronic sinusitis may be related to the poor drainage

    and increased intranasal pressure that develops during inflammation. This can decrease the

    mucosal blood flow and depress ciliary action, thus reducing the intrasinus oxygen tension. The

    lowering of the oxygen content and pH supports the growth of anaerobes. (Brook, 2005)

    Most cases of acute rhinosinusitis are caused by viral infections associated with the common

    cold. Mucosal edema leads to obstruction of the sinus ostia. In addition, viral and bacterial

    infections impair the cilia, which transport mucus. The obstruction and slowed mucus transport

    cause stagnation of secretions and lowered oxygen tension within the sinuses. This environment

    is an excellent culture medium for viruses and bacteria. (Ann M. Aring and Miriam M. Chan,

    2011)

    Usually, the margins of the edematous mucosa have a scalloped appearance, but in severe cases,

    mucus may completely fill a sinus, making it difficult to distinguish an allergic process from

    infectious sinusitis. Characteristically, all of the paranasal sinuses are affected and the adjacent

    nasal turbinates are swollen. Air-fluid levels and bone erosion are not features of uncomplicated

    allergic sinusitis; however, swollen mucosa in a poorly draining sinus is more susceptible to

    secondary bacterial infection.

    Contrary to earlier models of sinus physiology, the drainage patterns of the paranasal sinuses

    depend not on gravity but on the mucociliary transport mechanism. The metachronous

    coordination of the ciliated columnar epithelial cells propels the sinus contents toward the natural

    sinus ostia. Any disruption of the ciliary function results in fluid accumulation within the sinus.

    Exposure to bacterial toxins can reduce ciliary function. Approximately 10% of cases of acute

    sinusitis result from direct inoculation of the sinus with a large amount of bacteria. Dental

    abscesses or procedures that result in communication between the oral cavity and sinus can

    produce sinusitis by this mechanism. (Brook,2005).

    Recent interest for biofilms has been sparked by a potential role for biofilms in this process, with

    a significant body of evidence implicating them in inciting sinonasal inflammation. Biofilms are

    clearly present on the sinus mucosa of Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients, and their presence

    there is associated with severe disease characteristics and surgical recalcitrance. (Foreman A et

    al, 2012). Bacterial biofilms consist of a complex, organized community of bacteria, which are

    encased in an exopolysaccharide matrix they have produced and anchor to both biotic and abiotic

  • 7/29/2019 Bakterial Sinusitis

    3/4

    surfaces.Biofilm bacteria exhibit an altered phenotype with respect to growth rate and gene

    transcription.This configuration allows the bacteria for the evasion of host defenses and

    decreased susceptibility to antibiotic therapy, but this process maintains the ability to deliberately

    release planktonic bacteria, resulting in recurrent acute infections. (Zhou Bing, 2012)

    Several different techniques were employed to visualise biofilms. Arguably the most convincing

    method was fluorescence in situ hybridization, since this provides contrast between bacterial

    DNA and host cells. Biofilms on mucosal surfaces appear as punctate staining (bacterial cells),

    occasionally with some diffuse coloration, suggestive of extracellular nucleic acids. (Robert C.

    Shields et al, 2013). Biofilms or biofilm-forming bacteria have been associated with

    unfavourable outcomes following functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). For example, the

    presence of biofilms on paranasal sinus mucosa was correlated with persistent mucosal

    inflammation and requirements for lengthy post-surgical follow-up periods.

    The presence of bacterial biofilms in CRS patients (with/without nasal polyps) both before and

    after endoscopic surgery (ESS) has been identified by advanced techniques and is associated

    with an increased likelihood of unfavorable outcomes in ESS. However, the impact of biofilms

    on mucosal inflammation is not fully understood. Given that patients with CRS with nasal polyps

    (CRSwNP) usually have bilateral nasal polyps in the middle meatus, which may form in the

    nasal cavity or paranasal sinuses, this unique character may facilitate the growth of bacteria, such

    asStaphylococcus aureus. Furthermore, patients with CRSwNP are associated with a high risk of

    the development of asthma. In addition, the polyp tissues usually contain a lot of eosinophils and

    Th2 cytokines, such as IL-5 and IL-13, and histimine, which may promote fungal infection.

    However, whether the presence of biofilm is associated with any specific clinical characteristics

    in patients with CRSwNP has not been explored, particularly in Chinese patients. (Zhou Bing,

    2012)

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Shields%20RC%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Shields%20RC%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Shields%20RC%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Shields%20RC%5Bauth%5D
  • 7/29/2019 Bakterial Sinusitis

    4/4

    1. Cherry JD, Shapiro NL, Deville JG. Sinusitis. In: Feigin RD, Cherry JD, DemmierGJ, Kaplan SL, eds.Textbook of pediatric infectious disease. 5

    thed. Philadelphia, PA:

    WB Saunders; 2004:201.

    2. Brook, Itzhak. 2005. Bacteriology of Acute and Chronic Ethmoid Sinusitis. J ClinMicrobiol. 2005 July; 43(7): 34793480.

    3. Ann M. Aring and Miriam M. Chan, 2011. Acute Rhinosinusitis in Adults. AmericanAcademy of Family Physicians. 83(9): 1057-1063.

    4. Brook, Itzhak et al. 2013. Acute Sinusitis.http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/232670-overview diakses pada 7 September

    2013.

    5. Foreman, A., Boase S. Psaltis A., Wormlad PJ. 2012. Role of Bacterial and Fungalbiofilms in Chronic Rhinosinusitis.Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2012 Apr;12(2):127-35

    6. Zhou Bing. 2012. Clinical and histopathologic features of biofilm-associated chronicrhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in Chinese patients. Chinese Medical Journal.

    2012;125(6):1104-1109

    7. Robert C. Shields, Norehan Mokhtar, et al. 2013. Efficacy of a Marine BacterialNuclease against Biofilm Forming Microorganisms Isolated from Chronic

    Rhinosinusitis.PLoS One. 2013; 8(2): e55339

    http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/232670-overviewhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22322439http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22322439http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22322439http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Shields%20RC%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Mokhtar%20N%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Mokhtar%20N%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Shields%20RC%5Bauth%5Dhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22322439http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/232670-overview