case presentation -...

41
Case presentation Case presentation Date: 2005/10/7 Speaker: Intern 宋湘琳 Supervisor: Dr. 許明欽

Upload: duongtuyen

Post on 06-Mar-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Case presentationCase presentationDate: 2005/10/7Speaker: Intern Supervisor: Dr.

  • The patientThe patient

  • General data

    Number:Q120243470 Name:x Sex: male Age: 38 year-old Date of admission: 2005/09/18

  • Chief complaint

    Progressive intermittent speech disturbance for 2 weeks with recent worsening in 2~3 day

  • Brief historyUnderlie disease

    Denied hypertension, DM Smoking(+)

    Admitted on 2005/7/23 due to right hand weakness Left intracranial ICA stenosis

    Regular follow-up at neurologists outpatient department

    Admitted on 2005/9/8

  • Admission in July

    Chief complaint and symptoms/ signs Stepwise downhill of right hand weakness in this

    mid-July. Stuttered speech was once noticed but no more after

    admission PE

    Right hand muscle power: MRC grade 2 Heart: RHB, no murmurs No carotid bruits No conjunctival petechiae, no petechiae at finger, toe

    tips

  • Laboratory survey Hct: 46.8%, WBC: 9.58x10^3 Hypertriglyceredemia (TCH: 336 mg/dL, HDL: 31

    mg/dL) INR: 0.98, aPTT: 28.6/28.9 Indicator of autoimmune disease and

    hyperchoaglatory status within normal range ESR, CRP, ANCA, ds-DNA, SSA, SSB, RA, protein C,

    protein S, antihrombin III, C3, C4, PR3, MPO, cold HA, cryoglobin, homocystein, except for ACA-CT

  • Brain CT Multiple cortical infarctions over left high frontoparietal

    lobe.

    Carotid duplex and transcranial duplex study Grossly normal

    MRA+ angiography Left supraclinoid ICA stenosis of 52% Relative small caliber of left ACA with sluggish flow. Other normal vessels

  • 20050729 brain CT without contrast

  • 20050729 supratentorial DWI

  • Impression Ischemic infarction due to left intracranial ICA

    stenosis Embolic infarction impressed due to

    Stepwise downhill of neurologic function at the same territory.

    Cortical infarction

    Treatment Bokey 100 mg qd Warfarin 5mg qd

    Discharge on 8/8 Improved right hand weakness INR: 1.82 Warfarin 5mg qd

  • Regular follow up at OPD

    8/22: INR: 4.37 ->warfarin 2.5mg qd Regular rehabilitation. Maximal right hand motor function after 2~3 weeks

    after discharge, then progressive weakness was noticed again

    8/31: INR: 2.30

  • Admission againSymptoms and signs

    Speech Slurred speech noticed for 2 weeks with poorer right hand

    muscle power Speech became worse with stutter in these 2~3days

    Muscle power Facial asymmetry noticed by his wife. Worsening right hand muscle power Chocking while drinking water

    Sensation Right face numbness, right hand fullness sensation

    Other positive or negative findings No nausea, vomiting, neck stiffness, diplopia, dizziness,

    vertigo, hearing loss, fever, newly unsteady gait No palpitation Mild headache

  • PE Right central facial palsy Tongue deviated to right Rright hand muscle power: grade 2 with poor

    coordination function

    Lab INR: 1.2

    Brain CT A new hypodense lesion at left parietal lobe

  • 20050729 brain CT 20050914 brain CT

  • Impression Recurrent ischemic stroke at the territory of stenotic

    ICA under medical treatment

    Treatment Warfarin 4mg qd Clexane Bokey 100mg qd

    Endovascular intervention and extracranial-intracranial bypass has been explained to the family

  • Clinical Problem and Clinical Problem and evidenceevidence

  • Is advanced intervention beneficial to our patient in terms of prevention of recurrent CVA?

    Advanced intervention: angioplasty with/ without stentPatient: young age, with >50% intracranial carotid stenosis, smoking (+), hypertrilyceredemia, recurrent stroke under aspirin 100mg qdand warfarin INR 1.2

  • Searching

    PubmedSearch intracranial, carotid, atherosclerosis

    Field: TitleSearch intracranial, carotid, endovascular Field:

    TitleSearch intracranial, carotid, endovascular Field:

    TitleSearch intracranial, carotid, stent Field: Title

  • There is no evidence comparing endovascular intervention and medical treatment

  • What is the prognosis (recurrence of CVA, mortality) of this patient? Recurrent rate under no medical treatment Recurrent rate under medical treatment Predictors of recurrence, disease prgression

  • SearchingPubmed

    Search intracranial, carotid, atherosclerosisField: Title

    Search intracranial, carotid, stenosis Field: TitleSearch intracranial, stenosis Field: TitleSearch intracranial, atherosclerosis Field: Title

  • The Prognosis of Carotid Siphon Stenosis

    15 patients Siphon stenosis > 50% Follow-up 51 months 20% suffered from recurrent stroke (ICA territory) Annual ipsilateral stroke and mortality rates: 3.1%, 4.7%

    LAWRENCE R. WECHSLER, M.D, et alStroke Vol 17, No 4, 1986

    Case report

  • Method 21 patients, 45 lesions (ICA, MCA, ACA, PCA, VB) Blind interpretation of angiogram by two radiologist Average interval of repeated angiogram: 26.7 months

    Result All intracranial arteries: 43.9 %-> 51.8%(p= 0.32) Clinical prognosis

    Death: 1, TIA: 4, ICH: 1

    Case report (retrospecitve review of medical records)

    Natural history of stenosis from intracranial atherosclerosis by serial angiography

    Paul T. Akins, MD, PhD; et alStroke. 1998;29:433-438.

  • Progression of mean stenosis

    Overall: P=0.32

    ACA, MCA, PCA: p=0.37

    Change< 10%: stable

    Regression: 14% ICA, 28% ACA-MCA-PCA group

    Risk factors of progressionAge, sex,race,interval between angiograms, DM, HTN, smoking, hypercholesterolemia, ethanol use (-)Abscence of stenosis at bifurcation

  • Long-term mortality and recurrent stroke risk among Chinese stroke patients with predominant intracranial atherosclerosis

    Prospective controlled study

    Patient selection 705 patients with acute ischemic stroke population-based

    Vascular lesion: TCD Follow-up: 42 months (28+- 5 months)

    Ka Sing Wong, MD; Huan Li, MDStroke October 2003

  • 14% 19%

  • Without V.S. with vascular lesion (CVA): 65 v.s. 88 (p< 0.02)

  • P

  • A comparison of warfarin and aspirin for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke

    Multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial

    Warfarin (INR: 1.4~2.8) v.s. aspirin 325mg Patient selection

    2206 patients, 30~85 year-old

  • Intracranial internal carotid artery stenosis: longterm prognosis

    The natural history of intracranial carotid artery atheroscleosisRichard J, et al.

    Neurology foucs:18, Jan, 2005

    66 patients Angiogram: stenosis> 50% 3.9 years Annual ipsilateral stroke rate: 3.1%

    Resource: review article

    Marzewski DJ, et alStroke 12:821, 1982

  • Conclusion and Conclusion and applicationapplication

  • Conclusion

    Rate of recurrent stroke or TIA: 3.1%~25.7%Stroke and death: 16%

    Predictors of disease progression: age, DM, Af, more vessels occluded

    Intracranial ICA stenosis more stable

    Severity of stenosis?

  • Application

    Currently, there was no strong evidence indicating that endovascular intervention is better than medical therapy to this patient.

    Young age, DM(-), Af(-), only one vessel occluded. Severity of stenosis?

    Advanced intervention is not advised to this patientAdvanced intervention is not advised to this patient.

  • Question and Question and CommentsComments

  • endovascular interventionevidenceendovascular interventionmedical treatmentstrong evidence? reviewno strong

    evidence endovascular intervention

    studyinterventionoutcome studysearch embolic infarction?

    stepwise downhill of muscle powercortical infarctionEmbolic infarctionfavor

    embolic infarction? territoryclinical sings

    thrombus, ex. AMI, arrythmia.

    atherosclerosis? radiologiststenosisatherosclerosiscarotid

    dissectioncongenital disease

    Case presentationThe patientGeneral dataChief complaintBrief historyAdmission in JulyRegular follow up at OPDAdmission againClinical Problem and evidenceSearchingSearchingNatural history of stenosis from intracranial atherosclerosis by serial angiographyIntracranial internal carotid artery stenosis: longterm prognosisConclusionApplication