case study - nol-tec systems · case study reducing dsi operating costs the station has one 175 mwe...

2
Determine the required sorbent injection rates to meet compliance at low, medium, and high loads. Compare the effectiveness of Sorb-Tec™ Lance-Less Technology against traditional lances. Determine sorbent injection impact on downstream electrostatic precipitator (ESP) and fly ash handling systems. Test the impact on mercury removal of adding hydrated lime to activated carbon. Case Study Reducing DSI Operating Costs The station has one 175 MWe coal-fired generating unit, using PRB coal. The client requested Nol-Tec Systems to provide a temporary DSI system for analysis of SO2 emissions performance Activated carbon is injected prior to the air heater for mercury control. During the test period, hydrated lime was also injected prior to the air heater. The north duct was fitted with six Sorb-Tec injectors. The south duct utilized six, four-foot long lances for injection. An FTIR probe was installed at the discharge of each ESP outlet. Sorbent was fed into the system via two 25 ft3 weigh hoppers for accurate measurement of the sorbent used (within an accuracy of 0.5% wt.) Project Objectives Set-Up Sorb-Tec injectors installed in standard injection openings Sorb-Tec control boxes Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. t 425 Apollo Drive, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 t Ph: 651-780-8600 [email protected] t www.nol-tec.com

Upload: others

Post on 22-Sep-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Case Study - Nol-Tec Systems · Case Study Reducing DSI Operating Costs The station has one 175 MWe coal-fired generating unit, using PRB coal. The client requested Nol-Tec Systems

�� Determine the required sorbent injection rates to meet compliance at low, medium, and high loads.

�� Compare the effectiveness of Sorb-Tec™ Lance-Less Technology against traditional lances.

�� Determine sorbent injection impact on downstream electrostatic precipitator (ESP) and fly ash handling systems.

�� Test the impact on mercury removal of adding hydrated lime to activated carbon.

Case Study Reducing DSI Operating Costs

�� The station has one 175 MWe coal-fired generating unit, using PRB coal. The client requested Nol-Tec Systems to provide a temporary DSI system for analysis of SO2 emissions performance

�� Activated carbon is injected prior to the air heater for mercury control. During the test period, hydrated lime was also injected prior to the air heater.

�� The north duct was fitted with six Sorb-Tec injectors. The south duct utilized six, four-foot long lances for injection.

�� An FTIR probe was installed at the discharge of each ESP outlet.

�� Sorbent was fed into the system via two 25 ft3 weigh hoppers for accurate measurement of the sorbent used (within an accuracy of 0.5% wt.)

Project Objectives

Set-Up

Sorb-Tec injectors installed instandard injection openings

Sorb-Tec control boxes

Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. t 425 Apollo Drive, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 t Ph: [email protected] t www.nol-tec.com

Page 2: Case Study - Nol-Tec Systems · Case Study Reducing DSI Operating Costs The station has one 175 MWe coal-fired generating unit, using PRB coal. The client requested Nol-Tec Systems

Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. t 425 Apollo Drive, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 t Ph: [email protected] t www.nol-tec.com

Observed Performance

Completely clean inside of Sorb-Tec injector after test

Unit LoadStandard

LancesSorb-TecInjectors

Savings withSorb-Tec Performance

MW Injection rate (lbs./hr.) required to obtain compliance

65 889 lb/hr 622 lb/hr 267 lb/hr 30.0%

130-140 2,760 lb/hr 1.932 lb/hr 828 lb/hr 31.9%

160-175 6,104 lb/hr 4,273 lb/hr 1,831 lb/hr 42.9%

Conclusions

�� Sorb-Tec is a viable solution for reducing the usage of dry sorbent injected for SO2 compliance standards.

�� Sorb-Tec delivered between 30-43% sorbent reduction against standard lances, ensuring optimum injection efficiency can be achieved at any load.

�� The additional air added through the Sorb-Tec injectors had no impact on plant conditions and ID fans throughout the trial.

�� No negative impacts were observed on the ash handling system, with expected reduction in sorbent in ash content (% reduction not analyzed during trial).

�� No pluggage of the injectors throughout the duration of the trial, minimizing all lance-related maintenance often occurring when injecting dry sorbents.