統合的心理療法とドードー鳥の裁定...

－407 － Clin Eval 41 （2）2013 統合的心理療法とドードー鳥の裁定：心理療法に優劣はない齊尾　武郎＊フジ虎ノ門健康増進センター Integrative psychotherapy and dodo bird verdict: No need for striving for mastery Takeo Saio Fuji Toranomon Health Promotion Center Abstract Background：Though cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is all the vogue today, it is not certain whether CBT is overwhelmingly superior to the other types of psychotherapies in efficacy and clinical effectiveness. Objective：To show all psychotherapies have been deemed equally efficacious and effective. Design：Narrative, non-systematic review of the literature on the trend of CBT as well as constituents of the efficacy of psychotherapy in general. Results：Recently, CBT has been incorporated into the UK national mental health policy because of the vast amounts of evidence concerning its efficacy and effectiveness for both depression and anxiety disorders. However, in the history of the evaluation of psychotherapeutic validity, there is a tradition of research on the common factors across psychotherapies (“Lambert’s big four”) as well as on the claim of equivalence between various kinds of psychotherapies (“dodo bird verdict”). There is also a research tradition of exploring integrative psychotherapy which incorporates these common factors and the claim of equivalence as skeletal principles. Conclusion：The commonality and equivalence of psychotherapy permit clinicians to practice any particular psychotherapy very cautiously without any coercion of patients, and recommend common-sense psychotherapy performed in a casual manner. Key words commonality, equivalence, psychotherapy integration, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), criticism Rinsho Hyoka（Clinical Evaluation）2013；41：407－20. ＊ K&S産業精神保健コンサルティング（K&S Consulting Office for Occupational Mental Health）論説

Upload: others

Post on 05-Sep-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents

0 download

Report

Download

Embed Size (px):

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 統合的心理療法とドードー鳥の裁定心理療法に優劣はないcont.o.oo7.jp/41_2/p407-20.pdf · 2019. 9. 17. · Integrative psychotherapy and dodo bird verdict:

－407－

Clin Eval 41

統合的心理療法とドードー鳥の裁定：心理療法に優劣はない

齊尾　武郎フジ虎ノ門健康増進センター

Integrative psychotherapy and dodo bird verdict: No need for striving for mastery

Takeo SaioFuji Toranomon Health Promotion Center

AbstractBackground：Though cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is all the vogue today, it is not certain whether CBT is overwhelmingly superior to the other types of psychotherapies in efficacy and clinical effectiveness.Objective：To show all psychotherapies have been deemed equally efficacious and effective.Design：Narrative, non-systematic review of the literature on the trend of CBT as well as constituents of the efficacy of psychotherapy in general.Results：Recently, CBT has been incorporated into the UK national mental health policy because of the vast amounts of evidence concerning its efficacy and effectiveness for both depression and anxiety disorders. However, in the history of the evaluation of psychotherapeutic validity, there is a tradition of research on the common factors across psychotherapies (“Lambert’s big four”) as well as on the claim of equivalence between various kinds of psychotherapies (“dodo bird verdict”). There is also a research tradition of exploring integrative psychotherapy which incorporates these common factors and the claim of equivalence as skeletal principles.Conclusion：The commonality and equivalence of psychotherapy permit clinicians to practice any particular psychotherapy very cautiously without any coercion of patients, and recommend common-sense psychotherapy performed in a casual manner.

Key wordscommonality, equivalence, psychotherapy integration, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), criticism

Rinsho Hyoka Clinical Evaluation

論説