特殊評価(1)...heart rate was 107.6, 91.8 and 88.6 beats/min, respectively. pressure on a...

14
特殊評価(1) 空気圧を利用したトレッドミル歩行の評価 DEVELOPMENT AND CLINICAL USE OF A FLOAT WALKING ASSIST SYSTEM USING AIR PRESSURE (科学研究費 萌芽 2005年度, 萌芽 2007年度,シーズ試験研究 2007年度)

Upload: others

Post on 22-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 特殊評価(1)...Heart rate was 107.6, 91.8 and 88.6 beats/min, respectively. Pressure on a foot significantly decreased at partial weight bearing settings. The pressure pattern

特殊評価(1)

空気圧を利用したトレッドミル歩行の評価DEVELOPMENT AND CLINICAL USE OF A FLOAT

WALKING ASSIST SYSTEM USING AIRPRESSURE

(科学研究費 萌芽 2005年度, 萌芽 2007年度,シーズ試験研究 2007年度)

Page 2: 特殊評価(1)...Heart rate was 107.6, 91.8 and 88.6 beats/min, respectively. Pressure on a foot significantly decreased at partial weight bearing settings. The pressure pattern

In the field of physical therapy, walkingassist systems that comfortably reducebody weight are needed for patients withjoint pain or muscle weakness of lowerlimbs. Although suspension devices orunderwater walking systems reduce theweight, those do not resemble to normalwalking pattern.

Therefore, we developed a float walkingassist system using LBPP4,5. Today, the2nd generation system has beendeveloped.

4) Morinaga T (2002) the8th ACPT 2002,Bangkok

5) Kuroki H (2003) the14th WCPT 2003,Barcelona

The first generation system

Page 3: 特殊評価(1)...Heart rate was 107.6, 91.8 and 88.6 beats/min, respectively. Pressure on a foot significantly decreased at partial weight bearing settings. The pressure pattern

Side view

The LBPP chambercontaining a treadmill,which encloses thesubjects lower body in aninflatable chamber at thewaist by a flexible seal,has been used.

A float walking assist system using air pressure(The second generation system)

Page 4: 特殊評価(1)...Heart rate was 107.6, 91.8 and 88.6 beats/min, respectively. Pressure on a foot significantly decreased at partial weight bearing settings. The pressure pattern

Drafting picturePosterior view

Page 5: 特殊評価(1)...Heart rate was 107.6, 91.8 and 88.6 beats/min, respectively. Pressure on a foot significantly decreased at partial weight bearing settings. The pressure pattern

A pressure gauge

A loadindicator

An air pressurecontrollerA controller to

elevatetreadmill

Page 6: 特殊評価(1)...Heart rate was 107.6, 91.8 and 88.6 beats/min, respectively. Pressure on a foot significantly decreased at partial weight bearing settings. The pressure pattern

Four load cells aremounted under thetreadmill

Treadmill

An airpressurization device

Page 7: 特殊評価(1)...Heart rate was 107.6, 91.8 and 88.6 beats/min, respectively. Pressure on a foot significantly decreased at partial weight bearing settings. The pressure pattern

A flexible seal at thewaist

Page 8: 特殊評価(1)...Heart rate was 107.6, 91.8 and 88.6 beats/min, respectively. Pressure on a foot significantly decreased at partial weight bearing settings. The pressure pattern

Subjects: Thirteen females with hiposteoarthritis, including eightsubjects who underwent total hiparthroplasty

Age (mean ± SD): 55.6 ± 7.7 yearsBody height (mean ± SD) : 151.9 ± 13.2 cmBody weight (mean ± SD) : 55.6 ± 11.8 kgLength around the hip (level of ASIS): 90.0 ± 11.6 cm

Page 9: 特殊評価(1)...Heart rate was 107.6, 91.8 and 88.6 beats/min, respectively. Pressure on a foot significantly decreased at partial weight bearing settings. The pressure pattern

Walking: 1) Before walking, written informed consent was

obtained. 2) Target air pressure for 2/3 and 1/2 partial

weight bearing was measured at standingposition.

3) Each subject randomly walked at a full-weight,2/3- and 1/2-weight bearing setting, at aspeed of 1.5 km/hour.

Four measuring parameters: 1) Maximum pressure on a foot 2) Mean pressure on a foot during the stance 3) VO2 4) Heart rate

Statistical analysis: Repeated measure ANOVAand Post-hoc Sheffe’s test

Pressure measuring systemon a foot(MP-100, AnimaLtd., Japan )

Respiratory gas analyzer(AE-280, Minato Ltd.,Japan )

Heart rate measuring system(EBP-300, Minato Ltd.,Japan)

Page 10: 特殊評価(1)...Heart rate was 107.6, 91.8 and 88.6 beats/min, respectively. Pressure on a foot significantly decreased at partial weight bearing settings. The pressure pattern

Maximum pressure on a foot

% body weight

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Full-weight

bearing

2/3-weight

bearing

1/2-weight

bearing% !!"p<0.01

!!

!!!!

Body weight

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Full-weight

bearing

2/3-weight

bearing

1/2-weight

bearing

kg

!!"p<0.01

!!

!!

Average pressure was 2.3 kPa for 2/3- weight bearing setting and 3.2 kPa for 1/2-weight bearing setting, respectively. Maximum load on the foot at full-, 2/3- and1/2- weight bearing settings was 104.3 %, 75.7 % and 64.0 %, respectively.

Page 11: 特殊評価(1)...Heart rate was 107.6, 91.8 and 88.6 beats/min, respectively. Pressure on a foot significantly decreased at partial weight bearing settings. The pressure pattern

Mean pressure on a foot during stance phase

Body weight

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Full-weight

bearing

2/3-weight

bearing

1/2-weight

bearing

kg

!!"p<0.01

!!!!

% body weight

0

20

40

60

80

100

Full-weight

bearing

2/3-weight

bearing

1/2-weight

bearing

%

!!"p<0.01

!!

!!!!

The mean pressure on a foot was 69.1 %, 49.7 % and 41.8 %,respectively.

Page 12: 特殊評価(1)...Heart rate was 107.6, 91.8 and 88.6 beats/min, respectively. Pressure on a foot significantly decreased at partial weight bearing settings. The pressure pattern

VO2 and Heart Rate

Heart Rate

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Full-weight

bearing

2/3-weight

bearing

1/2-weight

bearingbea

ts/m

in

!"p<0.05

!!

VO2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Full-weight

bearing

2/3-weight

bearing

1/2-weight

bearing

ml/kg/min

!"p<0.05

! !

VO2 was 11.0, 8.4 and 7.8 mlO2/kg/min, respectively. Heartrate was 107.6, 91.8 and 88.6 beats/min, respectively.

Page 13: 特殊評価(1)...Heart rate was 107.6, 91.8 and 88.6 beats/min, respectively. Pressure on a foot significantly decreased at partial weight bearing settings. The pressure pattern

Pressure on a foot significantly decreased atpartial weight bearing settings.The pressure pattern was two peaks thatseemed to natural walking pattern.At the 2/3-weight bearing setting, the bodyweight was reduced accurately.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1 21 41 61 81

time (second)

FWB 2/3 PWB 1/2 PWB

!

67%

50%

% b

od

y w

eig

ht

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

It may be controlled by additionalair pressure before or duringwalking.

At the 1/2-weight bearing setting with airpressure of 3.2 kPa, peak pressure was alittle bit higher than the setting.This means the air pressure was notenough to reduce the body weight.

Page 14: 特殊評価(1)...Heart rate was 107.6, 91.8 and 88.6 beats/min, respectively. Pressure on a foot significantly decreased at partial weight bearing settings. The pressure pattern

黒木裕士,森永敏博,池添冬芽,大畑光司,家城弘,濱 弘道:空気圧を利用した部分荷重トレッドミル歩行が消費エネルギーに及ぼす影響  - 人工股関節置換術後患者での測定.理学療法学 2004; 31(5):319-324.

黒木裕士,森永敏博,池添冬芽,大畑光司,家城弘,濱 弘道:空気圧による免荷トレッドミル歩行装置 -変形性股関節症患者での測定.運動・物理療法2003; 14(2):151-158.

文献