city wide social survey series 5 - university research...

City Wide Social Survey Series 5

Dr. Christine S. Diaz

Ms. Mildred M. Estanda

Ms. Ma. Vanessa Amor E. Sobrejuanite

Ateneo de Davao University

E. Jacinto St.

With Funding Support from the

University Research Council (URC)

Administered by:

Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

Methodology

• CWSS 5 was conducted last May 25-30, 2016

• Face to Face interviews

• Random Sampling

±4 margin of error, 95% level of significance

• 630 adults in Davao City

3 Districts

11 Sub-districts

• Some questions of the survey were shared by SWS to Ateneo de Davao

University.


E. Jacinto St.



Administered by:



E. Jacinto St.



Administered by:



E. Jacinto St.



Administered by:


Geographical Summaries


E. Jacinto St.



Administered by:



E. Jacinto St.



Administered by:


District 2

n=210

District 1

n=210

District 3

n=210


E. Jacinto St.



Administered by:


Sub – District Number of

respondents

Poblacion 68

Talomo 142

Agdao 42

Bunawan 54

Buhangin 106

Paquibato 8

Baguio 20

Calinan 45

Marilog 25

Toril 71

Tugbok 49

Total 630


E. Jacinto St.



Administered by:


Ensuring Integrity

of Data

1. Proper screening of enumerators & training.

2. Training of field supervisors.

3. Feedback mechanisms.

4. GIS-Geographic Information System



Administered by:



E. Jacinto St.



Administered by:


GIS – Geographic

Information

System

SDAPS

PLOTTING


E. Jacinto St.



Administered by:


Outline of Presentation• Socio-Demographic Characteristics

• Household Facilities/Amenities

• Health

• Environment and Disaster preparednessPart 1

• Labor Force Status and Profile

• Financial Situation

• Self-Rated Poverty and Economic Trend Indicators

Part 2

• ASEAN 2015

• Peace and Order

• Social issues

• Governance and Post elections

• Happiness

Part 3


E. Jacinto St.



Administered by:



E. Jacinto St.



Administered by:


SOCIO DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE


E. Jacinto St.



Administered by:


Age Youngest: 18 years Oldest: 89 yearsMedian: 43 years old

3%

7%

10%

9%

13%

10%

9%

10%

9%

13%

3% 3%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

18-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-70 71-75 76+

20%

71%

7%

Single Married Common Law

Civil Status

CLASS OF DWELLING

AB6%

C29%

D45%

E20%

6%

26%

45%

22%

8%

31%

46%

15%

4%

30%

45%

21%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

AB C D E

District 1

District 2

District 3

78%

1%

10% 9%

0% 2%

77%

3%6%

9%

1% 0%

78%

1%

10% 9%

0% 2%0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Ownhousehold

Rights Renting Owned byrelatives

Owned byemployer

Owned bygovernment

District 1

District 2

District 3

Home Ownership

Lot Ownership Rental Fee (House and/or lot) per month:Ave: P4, 050Min: P100Max: P8, 000

52%

5%

15%10%

1%

11% 12%

32%

6% 4%7%

1%6% 7%

59%

5%7%

18%

2% 4% 3%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Own household Rights Renting Owned byrelatives

Owned byemployer

Owned bygovernment

Owned byother people

District 1

District 2

District 3

6%

10%

16%

28%

1%

5%

20%18%

7%8%

16%

22%

1%

8%

23%

14%

10%12%

14%

30%

3%

15% 15%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

No FormalEducation

SomeElementary

CompletedElementary

Some HighSchool

CompletedHigh School

SomeVocational

CompletedVocational

SomeCollege

CompletedCollege

PostCollege

District 1

District 2

District 3

Educational Attainment

86.03%

3.81%

3.33%3.17% 3.5%

Bisaya

Tagalog

kalagan

Cebuano

Others

Language Used at Home

37.46%

23.65%

6.83%

7.62%

1.90%

2.54%

1.90% 1.27%

1.59%

1.27%

1.43% 1.27%

11.20%

Dabawenyo

Cebuano

Ilongo

Boholano

Kagan

Bagobo

Bisaya

Waray

Kaulo

Surigaonon

Mandaya

Tagalog

Others

Ethnicity

Others:Bicolano, Aklanon,Batangueno,Dyangan,Klata,Leyteno,Manobo and Zamboangeno

74%

2%

5%

6%

13%

Roman Catholic

Iglesia ni Kristo

Protestant

Islam

others

Religion

Others: Adventist, Born Again, Alliance, Jehovah's Witness

HOUSEHOLD FACILITIES

Running water into the home

89%

80%

68%

11%

19%

31%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

District 1 District 2 District 3

YES

NO

95% Billed5% Not Billed

Water quality

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Better Same Worse Don’t know/cant tell

51%

42%

5%1%

41%

49%

10%

1%

50%

40%

8%

1%

District 1

District 2

District 3

Source of Drinking Water

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Gripo Delivery Spring Ulan Others

68%

20%

11%

5%

Gripo

Delivery

Spring

Ulan

Others

87%

13%

Household with rainwater collector

n=195

Yes

No

31%

69%

Yes No

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%


20%27%

46%

80%73%

54%

Yes

No

Use of

Rainwater

12%

88%

Shared

Owned

Toilet

24%

75%

1% 1%

Flush

De-Buhos

Direstso sa kinalotnga Yuta

Diretso sa Tubig

Antipolo

others (Ilog)

Types of Toilet

Household Electricity Connection

Electric consumption:Median: P 925.00

Max: P 16 000

94%

5%

With Electricity

Without Electricity

Billed99%

Not Billed

1%

Light Source (5%):Kerosene, Solar, Genset and Candles

28%

38%

1%

26%

12%

7%3%

39%

45%

2%

17%

6% 5%3%

72%

17%

1%

13%

2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Firewood Gas/LiquefiedPetroleum Gas

Kerosene Lamp Kahoy na Uling Bagol na Uling Butane Others (Bagaso,

Electricalcooking

apparatus)

District 1

District 2

District 3

Household Energy Sources

21%

79%

Yes No

Awareness on Renewable Energy

9%

91%

Yes No

For those who have telephone connection (n=58)

Telephone Connection

Cellular phone ownership

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

1 to 2 3 to 4 5+ None

73%

2% 1%

24%

16%

43%14%

12%

15%

Network subscription (n=607)

Globe

Smart

TnT

TM

ABS-CBNMobileSun

Number of household

members with cellular phones

n= 630

(%)

Less 5 83

5-8 13

9+ 2

No answer 2

TV and Cable Subscription

12.8%

87.2%

Cable

Without

cable

90%

10%

WithTelevision

WithoutTV

For those with television

n=567

59%

41%

Yes No

Radio Ownership

Television and radio usage

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Daily, 3+ hrs a

day

Daily,1-2 hrs a

day

Daily, less

than 1hr a day

A few days a

week

Never

68.9

19

5.9 5.3

0.9

36.3

26.3

9.9

23.7

3.8

TV

Radio

Vehicle Ownership

44

56

With Vehicle None

26.7

11.6

58.5

1.4

9

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

4-wheeledVehicle

3-WheeledVehicle

2-WheeledVehicle

Banca Bicycle

Type of vehicle owned4-wheeled Vehicle 3-Wheeled Vehicle 2-Wheeled Vehicle Banca Bicycle

75%

9%2%

19%22%

8% 10%

2%

69%

10%3%

26%

36%

17%

7%2%

51%

1%

55%

22% 20%

3% 2%0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

District 1

District 2

District 3

Mode of Transportation

HEALTH

76%

24%

Yes No

Do you consider yourself healthy?

If yes, Reasons n=476

Absence of Illness 86%

Able to sleep well 12%

Absence of Problem 11%

Happy 9%

Has peace of mind 7%Good relationship with

community 6%

Contented with life 5%

Good attitude4%

others 4%

Have Money 1%

If No, Reasons n=152

Has illness 85%

Has problem 5%others (Old age,

unhealthy lifesyle, just recently underwent a

surgery)

5%

Does not have money 3%

Cannot sleep well 1%

No peace of mind 1%

Not contented with life0%

40%

60%

Yes No

Family Members who got sick for the past 6 months

Family member who got sick in the last 6 months

n=254

Mother31%

Son 28%

Daughter25%

Father20%

33%

18%

36%

2%

6%

9%

8%

1%

1%

3%

3%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%

Ubo

Sip-on

Kalintura

Diarrhea

Hubak

High Blood

Diabetes

Sakit sa panit

Sakit sa atay

Sakit sa bato

Sakit sa baga Ubo

Sip-on

Kalintura

Diarrhea

Hubak

High Blood

Diabetes

Sakit sapanit

Illness of family members who got sickn=254

How was the

sickness cured?n=254

Sought Medical

Help 74%

Self Medicates26%

Albularyo3%

Ignored the Illness2%

Went to the Health

Center 2%

49%

37%40%

5%

10%

5% 2% 1%

5%

52%

42%

40%

2%

13%

6%

61%

30%

46%

4%

8% 7%

5%1%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Ubo Sip-on Kalintura Diarrhea Hubak High Blood Diabetes Sakit sa panit Sakit sa atay Sakit sa bato Sakit sa baga

District 1

District 2

District 3

Common Illnesses in the Community

Air Cleanliness

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Better Same Worse Don’t know/can’t tell

43%40%

16%

1%

39%43%

17%

1%

51%

33%

14%

1%

District 1

District 2

District 3

79%

21%

Yes No

84%

18%

Yes No

Awareness of HIV Prevalence in Davao City(n=498)

Awareness on HIV

51%48% yes

no

Awareness of Testing Facilities

Sources of Informationn= 218

(%)

TV 77

Radio 14

Health Center 12

Neighbors 11

Internet 6

Newspaper 5

DISASTER PREPAREDNESS


E. Jacinto St.



Administered by:


Hazards in the community

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Flood

Drought

Ipo-Ipo

Landslide

none

Fire

typhoon

others

48%

6%

1%

39%

10%

3%

3%

38%

8%

1%

6%

52%

10%

3%

3%

36%

19%

1%

11%

42%

10%

3%

3%

District 3

District 2

District 1

Others:brownout,balod, earthquake, liki sa dalan

25%

75%

Participated in Disaster Training

yes no

Training Provider( multiple response)

n=158

Barangay 61911 15School 8Red cross 9Workplace 7

Others ( church, NGOs)7

Drills given in the community( multiple response)

n=157

Fire drill 57

Earthquake drill 52

Tsunami drill 11

Storm drill 14

flood drill 38

Violence response 6

First Aid 7

Disaster orientation, response, prevention

8

Preparation for disaster (multiple response)

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Stock foodand water

Stockcandles,

Flashlight

Made houserepairs

Radio tofollow news

Safe place torelocate

Stockmaterials for

flood

46%48%

25%

30%

14%

23%

Stock food and water

Stock candles, Flashlight

Made house repairs

Radio to follow news

Safe place to relocate

Stock materials for flood

Satisfaction with Disaster Services

Very satisfied (%)Somewhat Satisfied(%)

Somewhat dissatisfied (%)

Very Dissatisfied (%)

Church 58.4 18.7 3.2 4.0

PNP58.3 17.0 3.8 3.8

City Govt55.4 23.5 3.2 5.9

DSWD52.9 18.3 6.0 5.6

Brgy Official 42.7 27.8 7.9 10.3

Private organization 30.5 22.1 7.5 8.9

DPWH 22.7 6.2 5.9 5.9

ENVIRONMENT


E. Jacinto St.



Administered by:


Climate change management initiatives

Series1

0%

20%

40%

60% 51%

28%45%

21% 23%19% 19%

Waste segregation

Recycling

Tree Planting

No burn Trash

No burn Plastic

Conserve electricity

Conserve water

Cleanliness of Davao City

76%

20%

2% 1%0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Better Same Worse Don’t know/cant tell

Better

Same

Worse

Don’t know/cant tell

Awareness on Watershed Protection, Conservation and Management Ordinance of Davao City

41%

59%

Yes No

City’s Perceived Compliance on Watershed Protection, Conservation and Management Ordinance of Davao Cityn= 258

59%

41%

Yes

No

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Strongly agree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree

Don’t Know

30%

41%

21%

4% 4%

42%

49%

5%

1%3%

39%

52%

4%3%

38%

47%

9%

2% 4%

Our water source in Davao City willnot be depleted.

There is a need to rehabilitate ourwatershed .

I have responsibility in rehabilitatingthe water source .

I am willing to pay for therehabilitation of our watershed .

Perception on Watershed Protection

Who has the greatest responsibility to rehabilitate watershed?

n= 630

(%)

Ordinary Citizens 42.4

LGU 32.7

Nat'l Govt 25.2

DCWD 1.6

Others ( Myself, God, DENR) 0.5

Heard about Organic Products?

66%

34%

Yes

No

31%

69%

Buy organicProducts

Do not buyorganic products

Purchase of Organic Products

Organic products

Type of organic productsn=130 Where the product is purchased? n=130

Vegetables 62 Specialty Store 27

Fruits 28 Supermarket 28

Rice 20 Market ( Bankerohan, Calinan, Panabo,

Agdao) 15Pork Meat 5Organic Bazaar 14

Fertilizers10 Neighborhood ( Backyard gardening) 7

Organic beverages and

medicines 5Direct Supplier ( Farm, Farmers

association 3Chicken Meat

4others ( online, friends, delivery) 3Eggs

2

Others2

LABOR FORCE STATUS AND PROFILE

Work Status

40.0%

50.0%

10.0%

47.0% 39.0% 14.0%

40.5%

44.8%

13.3%

Has a job Does not have a jobright now but had a

job before

Never had a job


27%

52%

67%

58%

38%32%

Has a job Does not have ajob right nowbut had a job

before

never had a job

FEMALE MALE

11.50%

5.40% 5.40%

77.70%

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

1-3 months 4-6 months 6-12months

more thana year ago

Last time Davaoeño had job (n=278)

40.23

59.77

yes no

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Not working but looking for work (n=348

1.4

25.5

11.5

1

41.3

7.2

2.4

4.3

1.4

0 10 20 30 40 50

Waiting to be called back for theOLD job

Too young/too old

Retired

Physically handicapped

Busy with Household chores

Schooling

Tired of looking for a job

Problem with Health

Pregnancy

Reason for not looking for Job (n= 208)

12.6

3

3.7

23

6.7

48.1

3

0 10 20 30 40 50

never had a job before

did not voluntarily leave job

Laid off from work

contract ended, not renewed

employer closed operations

voluntarily left old job

waiting for result of application

Classification of looking for work (n=135)

60

40

yes

no

Available to have a job in the next two weeks (n=167)

84

16

yes

no

Willing to start a job in the next two weeks (n=106)

Among those working (n= 270)

53.6

42.7

2.2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

29.73

34.45

28.57

39.86

32.77

42.86

30.4132.77 28.57

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

45.00

Hired Self-employed Unpaid family worker


0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14%

Construction ( carpenters, mason, welder, machine…

Online and computer servicing

Vending

Service Provider ( Manicure, pedicure, laborer,…

Farming ( farmers, farm laborers, etc)

Government Employees

Licensed ( Engrs. Teachers )

Others

Driver

Security (security guard, military auxiliaries)

Teacher

Proprietor( Business owners, sari-sari store)

Sales ( Agents, sales lady, Bantay Tindahan)

Self-employment ( Photogrpaher, lanscape artists, )

Private employees

8%

2%

4%

8%

11%

6%

6%

2%

13%

5%

2%

9%

8%

8%

8%

MAIN OCCUPATION

Type of Employment n % %

Private Enterprise 100 38.61

REHISTRADO 99

HINDI REHISTRADO 1

Self-Employed 119 45.95

REHISTRADO 20.72

HINDI REHISTRADO 79.27

Government 33 12.74

Unpaid Family Worker 7 2.7

0 10 20 30 40 50

professional/technician

Manager

Community worker

clerical/admin/sales

refused to answer/noanswer

Non Agri/Skilled

Agriculture

Blue Collar

22.3

0.7

7.4

10.1

2.7

6.8

5.4

44.6

If hired, what type of work (n=140)

sari-sari store + Vegetable store

24%

Vending (food,catering, fish)

14%

(Ukay-ukay +online Business)

3%

Farming23%

Driving16%

Service(vulcanizing, manicure, pedicure, painting,

landscaping, dressmaking/tail

oring)13%

Others7%

Type of Business of the self-employed (n=119)

0

20

40

60

80

100

SSS PhilHealth Pag-Ibig

24

32.5

13.3

76

67.5

86.7

YES NO

Whether Davaoeño paid…

Benefit received in the past three months (multiple response)

29.1

31.1

8.8

53.4

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Regular Salary Increase

Productivity Bonus

Additional Benefits

No benefits at all

35.1

64.9

yes

no

Wanted to increase working hours? (n=262)

Min. number of hours of work: 1Maxi. number of hours of work: 168Median: 48

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

yes no

26%

74%

Whether looking for additional Work (n=270)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Need more income

Numerous loans

Can not buy my NEEDS

Can not spend for liesure

I have maintenance for illness

I have obligation

33%

4%

55%

55%

3%

16%

Reasons for looking additional work (multiple response)

67%

12%

6%

15%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

More No change Fewer Jobs Refused toAnswer

Perceived availability of Jobs next year

25.221.7

47.8

5.2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Easy to find Neither easynor hard to

find

Hard to find Don't Know

Ease or difficulty in finding a Job today

22.54%

77%

Yes

No

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Aspiration to live abroadYes

No

14.3%

85.6%

Yes

No

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Looking for a job abroad Yes

No

49%

21%

20%

10%

Easy to find

Neither easy nor hard to find

Hard to find

DK/no answr

Easy to find Job inDavao City in 12 months

OFW Family

20%

78%

2%

Yes No No answer 4

9

22

34

31

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Father Mother Son Daughter Others

Others: aunt/uncle, in-laws, grand children

20.8%

51.2%

4.0%

16.8%

7.2%

How Hired?n=125

Direct Hiring

Agency

Walk-in

Referral

others (DK, Marriage,Descendants)

Agency Fee: Median: P 30,000Max amount: P 200,000

Singapore and

Malaysia

Japan and

Korea

UAE,

Kuwait and

Saudi

Arabia

USA and

Canada

In what country are they

working?

North America

22%

Europe

5%East Asia

14%

Middle East

50% Southeast Asia

8%

Seafarer

2%

France and

London

41%

25%

10%

23%

Often Sometimes Seldom Never

Frequency of sending remittance (n=125)

Remittance

Allocation

(n=125)

Food 60.2%

Utilities 53.7%

Education 41.5%

Health 22.8%

Transportation 19.5%

Payment for Loans 13%

Savings 10.6%

Entertainment 10.6%

Others 4.1%

Monthly Family Income

Median: P9,100Max: P400, 000

Monthly Individual Income

Median: P5,500Max: P340, 000

Income Allocation (n=148)

Food 93.8

Utilities 77.9

Education 58.3

Transportation 41.9

Payment for Loans 21.4

Health 18.4

Savings 15.9

Entertainment 11.6

Others 4.1

FINANCIAL SITUATION

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Income is not enough

Just enough

With savings

27%

61%

12%

Financial Situation in the past three months

87

13

Yes No

Efforts to reduce Expenditure (n=148)

12%

37%

3%

2%

13%

33%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

Past savings

Loans

Government

Private Firms

Relatives

Sideline

Sources of additional funding (n=148)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Income notenough

Just enough With savings

19.5

60

20.5

15.7

50.4

8.7

2.6

17.4

9.6

Past savings Loans Government

Private assist Relatives Sideline

Perceived financial situation in the next three months

Source of funds for next three months (multiple response)

Financial Assistance received

12%6%

16%3%

3%

4%

64%

57%

Money Money (loaned/borrowed)

Food Non- Food

Job Schooling Support

Any Service None

57

43 yes

no

Had loan in the past year

How many loans last year?

Minimum: 1Maximum: 365Median: 2

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Money

Goods / Appliances

Food

Equipment for busness

79%

9%

14%

1%What is loaned? (multiple response)

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%

Cooperative

Bank

Credit card

SSS/GSIS/PAG-IBIG

Paluwagan

others (Motorcyle shop, sari sari store)

Friends

Five six

Microfinance

20%

5%

1%

4%

5%

5%

24%

24%

12%

Who is the lender (n= 360)

81.5

18.5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Yes No

Borrow from cooperative (n=114)

18

82

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Yes No

Member of a cooperative

78.4

24.7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Personal Business

Purpose of borrowing (n=114)

8

92

Yes

No

Attempted to loan from the bank

25

75

Yes

No

Refused by the bank (n=52)

4

96

Yes

No

Whether with credit cards

Minimum: 1Maximum: 6

0 20 40 60 80

Personal

Gadget

Travel

Clothes

Food

Business

Equipment

Travel

75

8

17

17

33

46

13

4Use of credit cards (n=24)

34%

66%

Yes No

Whether with savings

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

31%

12%

3%

53%

1%

Where the savings are placed (n=213)

10

9

16

71

1

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

others ( for the future, self, driverslicense, entertainment

For emergency purposes

Investment

Education

Business

Reason for saving (multiple response)

13.9

58.5

27.4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Can notsave

Not easynor difficult

to save

Difficult tosave

Perception on savings in the next three months (n=213)

10.5

20.8

44.9

23.5

19.7

4.8

6.2

1.7

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Arts and crafts

Mech Skills

carpentry

automotive

entreprenurial

computer programming

food technology

computer secretarial

30.6

1.6

31.9

41.1

water mineral land Don't Know

Common skills in the community (multiple response)Resources in the community

35

7

2

10

6

34

3

3

41

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Agricultural

fishery

forestry

industry

manufacturing

construction

communication

finance

small scale business

Usual sources of income in the community

22

78

Yes NO

Whether a training on business was given in the community

11.8

64

5.1

2.9

14.7

9.6

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

NGO

Barangay

academe

church

private

Government ( TESDA, DOLE, DTI,Military, DSWD [4Ps])

Who provided the training?

VII- SELF-RATED POVERTY

Perceived poverty status

3 3 3.2 3 5.6

82 8086 84

80.7

15 1711 13 13.7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

CWSS 1 CWSS 2 CWSS 3 CWSS 4 CWSS 5

Not poor On the line Poor

Perceived poverty status across districts

8.65.7

2.2

82.980.5 78.5

8.613.3

18.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90


Not poor On the line Poor

Desired Minimum monthly income: Ave: P12,317

Experience Hunger

17.3

82.7

Yes NO

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90


16 14

21.4

84 86

77.6

Yes NO

Experience Hunger across Districts

Past six months there is a widening gap between the rich and poor

33

47.5

13.2

2.24.1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Stronglyagree

agree disagree Stronglydisagree

DK

Responsibility of Davao City local government to close the gap

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Stronglyagree

moderatelyagree

moderatelydisagree

stronglydisagree

CWSS 3

CWSS 4

CWSS 5

ECONOMIC TREND INDICATOR

Quality of Life

24%22.10%

33%

25.80%

34.0%

51% 50.20%

43%

51.90%

45.1%

23%26.40%

24%

22.30% 20.0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

CWSS 1 CWSS 2 CWSS3 CWSS 4 CWSS5

Better now than 6 months ago Same as before Worse now than 6 months ago

Quality of Life in three Districts

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Better now than 6months ago

Same as before Worse now than 6months ago

Don’t know refused toanswer/no answer

33.8

48.1

18.1

4041.4

17.6

1

28.1

44.76

24.29

1.43 0.48

District 1

District 2

District 3

Personal optimism

3632.7

44.8 45.4

50

35

43.3 42

47.1

32

14 12.7 13.2

7.650

10

20

30

40

50

60

CWSS 1 CWSS 2 CWSS 3 CWSS 4 CWSS 5

Will be better Same Will be worse

51%

41.20%

57%54.90%

73%

36%

42.60%

33%

38.50%

14%12%16.20%

9%6.60%

2%0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

CWSS 1 CWSS 2 CWSS3 CWSS 4 CWSS5

Will be better Same Will be worse

Perception on the local economy

ASEAN INTEGRATION 2015


E. Jacinto St.



Administered by:


ASEAN Integration

ASEAN Integration will have positive effect on Mindanao? n = 119

77.30%

6.70%

16%

Agree

Disagree

Don't know

19%

81%

yes

no

Awareness on ASEAN Integration n = 630

ASEAN Integration

Mindanao is ready for ASEAN Integration

69.70%

12.60%

17.70%

Agree

Disagree

Don't know

Greatest threat to Peace and Order

22%

17%

17%

14%

13%

10%

7%

Drugs

Killings

Poverty

Criminal Incidents

Davao Death Squad

Calamity

Terrorism

Highly complied ordinances

80.50%82.90%

69.00%

83.30%80.50%

76.70%

70.50% 71.00%

62.90%

73.80%76.70%

68.10%

84.30% 85.70%

79.50%


Anti

discrimination

ordinance

Women's

Development

Code Ordinance

Anti-smoking

ordinance

Liquor Ban

Ordinance

Anti-Nuisance

Ordinance

Least Complied Ordinances

Halal Food Certification Ordinance 24.6%

Rainwater Harvesting Ordinance 41.1%

Speed Limit Ordinance 47.6%

Improvement on Infrastructure and Social Services

48.6%43.2% 43.2%

35.6%30% 34% 32% 29%

53%

32.1%34.8% 31.3%

30.0%32%

34% 36%28%

31%

11.1% 13.7% 13.8%14.0%

15%15% 13%

15%

5%

5.7% 6.3% 8.1% 10.6% 14% 11% 13% 14%7%

Roads,

Bridges,

Drainage

Public

School

Public

Hospital

Public

Parks

Electric

Power

Garbage

Disposal

Transport

services

Traffic

system

911

Services

Huge improvement Somewhat better Same Worsen

GOVERNANCE


E. Jacinto St.



Administered by:


Satisfaction on Performance of Government Officials

42% 45%49% 48.10%

51%

83%

99%91% 90% 87%

58% 55%51% 51%

50%

17%

1%9% 10% 13%

Satisfied Not Satisfied

Satisfaction on Performance of Government Officials

Satisfied%

Not Satisfied%

Net Satisfaction%

Pres. Benigno Aquino 42 58 -16

National Administration 45 55 -10

Senate 49 51 -2

Supreme Court 48 51 -3

House of Representatives 51 50 1

District Representative 83 17 66

Mayor Rodrigo Duterte 99 1 98

Vice Mayor Pulong Duterte 91 9 82

Davao City Council 90 10 80

Barangay Officials 87 13 74

Davao City local government addresses

concerns of ordinary people

90%

5% 5%

Agree

Disagree

No opinion

Is there a fair justice system in the Philippines?

4%

68%

28%

yes no don't know

Opinion about Davao Death Squad

8% 8% 10%

2%

60%

12%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

against humanrights

unjust just immoral will help solvecriminality

others

Opinion about Davao Death Squad

8% 9% 10%

2%

58%

13%

7% 7%10%

2%

63%

11%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

against human

rights

unjust just immoral can solve

criminality

others

male female

SOCIAL ISSUES


E. Jacinto St.



Administered by:


Important Social Issues Davao City

n=630%

District 1n=210

%

District 2n=210

%

District 3n=210

%

1Corruption 61.0

56.21st

66.7

3rd

59.01st

2Unemployment 60.0

54.82nd

68.6

2nd

56.22nd

3Drugs 59.2

53.33rd

69.5

1st

54.83rd

4 HIV-AIDS 54.9 49.0 62.4 52.9

5

Environmental Protection

54.450.0 61.0 51.9

6 Access to justice 52.1 45.7 60.0 50.0

Common Good

72.4%

57.8%

42.2%

49.4% 51.7%

41.6%

Availability of job Availability offood

no poverty there is peace equal opportunityfor development

there is unity

POST ELECTIONS


E. Jacinto St.



Administered by:


Electoral Participation

74%

26%

Voted last May 2016

n=630

Yes No

42%

34%

62%

44% 44%

7%

Voting is a wayto speak my

mind

One vote reallycounts

Voting caneffect change

Voting is mypublic duty

I want toexercise myright to vote

I'm interestedin politics

Reasons for votingn=468

Reasons for not votingn=162

2%

6%

5%

5%

2%

29%

14%

6%

5%

54%

vote will not make a difference

parties/candidates are the same

not interested in politics

not enough information

candidates do not represent my issues

name is not on the voter's list

no time

lines are too long

don't like the candidates

not registered

Perception on May 2016 Election

Agree96%

Disagree1%

Don’t know

3%

The election in Davao City was peaceful

Agree56%

Disagree39%

Don't know

5%

The election in Mindanao was peaceful


95%

1%

4%Agree

Disagree

Don'tknow

The election in Davao City was orderlyn=468

The election in Mindanao was orderly

56%40%

4%Agree

Disagree

Don'tknow

The election in Mindanao was orderlyn=468


88%

6% 6%

Agree

Disagree

Don't know

The COMELEC in Davao City was credible

88%

6%6%

Agree

Disagree

Don't know

The COMELEC in Davao City was competent


81%

4%15% Agree

Disagree

Don't know

BEIs were very helpful during the election

81%

5% 14%Agree

Disagree

Don't know

Poll watchers were effective in their duty


75%

13%

12%

Agree

Disagree

Don't know

VCM made the voting process efficient

92%

4% 4%

Agree

Disagree

Don't know

Election results were released in a timely manner


92%

4% 4%

Agree Disagree Don't know

Election results truly reflected the will of the Filipinos

86%

2%12%

Agree

Disagree

Don't know

I believe the new administration will value my vote


95.10%

0.20%4.70%

Agree Disagree Don't know

I am more hopeful after the election

Voter’s Choice for President

99%

1%

Rodrigo Duterte others

Whom did you vote as President last May 9, 2016?

n=468

Others: Grace Poe, Mar Roxas, Jejomar Binay, Miriam Santiago

67%

20%

76%

5%

3%

51%

track record

academic qualification

leadership abilities

candidate's political party

endorsement of outgoingPresident

platforms

What made you decide to vote the preferred presidential candidate?

Voter’s Choice for Vice President

9%

29%

60%

0% 0% 2%

Whom did you vote as vice president last May 9, 2016?

Robredo

Marcos

Cayetano

Trillanes

Honasan

Escudero

52%

22%

54%

14%

5%

44%

16%

Reasonsn=465

When in i t ia l and f ina l dec is ion to vote the preferred pres ident was made

Initial decision %

Final decision%

On filing of Candidacy 75 69

3 months before election 5.6 6.9

2 months before election 3.2 3.9

3 weeks before election 5.3 3.9

2 weeks before election 1.5 1.1

1 week before election 0.9 2.4

night before election 3.4 5.4

day of Election , outside precinct 1.7 3.0

day of election, inside precinct 1.3 2.4

NA 0.6 1.5

Refused to answer 19.2 19.1


E. Jacinto St.



Administered by:


Voter’s considerations in making the final decision

53.80%

46.70%

41.90%

22.20%

19.40%

19.40%

7.70%

7.50%

2.20%

1.30%

Candidate’s stand on issues

Perception about the candidate

Leadership abilities

Candidate promotes my priority issues

Candidate’s better chances of winning

My region/province

Others' perception of candidate

Family/peer influence

Church endorsement

Party affiliation

39%

27.30%

24.50%

21.30%

17.90%

16.40%

8.10%

8.10%

7.70%

7%

6.20%

4.70%

3.20%

2.10%

Television

Political debates

Political advertisements

Family

Political Surveys

Social media

Campaign flyers

Local talk/ tsismis

Friends

Miting de avance

Campaign sorties

Church

Voters' education

Celebrity endorsement

What influenced voter’s final decision?

Willingness to support the new President

Yes, 98.9%

no , 0.2% Don't know, 0.5%Refused to answer,

0.5%0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

Yes no Don't know Refused to answer

Type of support committed for the President

62%

38%

25%

40%

63%66%

35%

26%

36%

65%

58%

41%

23%

44%

61%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Participate inintiatives for

common good

Will notencourage

corrupt practice

Pay my taxes Not involve incriminal activities

Will not violateordinances and

laws

Davao City

Female

Male

Political actions of the incoming President that will disappoint supporters

73%

29%

27%

27%

19%

7%

13%

10%

3%

corruption

cannot address peace and order

lack of transparency

cannot generate employment

cannot stop criminality against persons

cannot stop criminality against property

cannot address discrimination

failure to make admin officials accountable

refused to answer

HAPPINESS


E. Jacinto St.



Administered by:



E. Jacinto St.



Administered by:


Extent of Happiness


E. Jacinto St.



Administered by:


Not happy at all Not totally happy Moderately happy Extremely happy

Legend:

= 10%

= 1%

1.1%

2.4%

62.7%

33.8%

Reasons for Happiness

relationshipwith friends

relationshipwith

community

relationshipwith family

health position atwork

religion sense of selfworth

71%

15%8% 8% 8% 6%

2%

The City Wide Social Survey Series 5With Funding Support from the


and

Administered by the

Social Research Training and Development Office


Thank You!

city wide social survey series 5 - university research...

Documents