class 15 copyright, winter, 2010 fair use: transaction costs randal c. picker leffmann professor of...
TRANSCRIPT
Class 15Copyright, Winter, 2010
Fair Use: Transaction Costs
Randal C. PickerLeffmann Professor of Commercial Law
The Law School
The University of Chicago
773.702.0864/[email protected] © 2005-10 Randal C. Picker. All Rights Reserved.
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 2
101: Computer Program
A “computer program” is a set of statements or instructions to be
used directly or indirectly in a computer in order to bring about a certain result.
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 3
117: Limitations on exclusive rights: Computer programs
(a) Making of additional copy or adaptation by owner of copy. Notwithstanding the provisions of section
106, it is not an infringement for the owner of a copy of a computer program to make or authorize the making of another copy or adaptation of that computer program provided:
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 4
117: Limitations on exclusive rights: Computer programs (1) that such a new copy or adaptation is created
as an essential step in the utilization of the computer program in conjunction with a machine and that it is used in no other manner, or
(2) that such new copy or adaptation is for archival purposes only and that all archival copies are destroyed in the event that continued possession of the computer program should cease to be rightful.
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 5
Sega v. Accolade
977 F.2d 1510 (9th Cir. 1992) Core Facts
Sega builds game console (Genesis) Licenses copyrighted computer code and
trademarks to third-party game makers Seems to require that licensees
manufacture cartridges themselves through Sega
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 6
Sega v. Accolade
Accolade doesn’t license; buys console and games and reverse engineers
That means that it produces a printout of the copyrighted source code
Accolade took that information and produced a manual with functional descriptions of how to interact with the Genesis console
Accolade produced its own games
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 7
Sega v. Accolade
What is going on here economically? from the perspective of copyright?
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 8
Intermediate Copying
Hypo Like the case, I copy the work to learn
something functional about the work I distill that learning into a work that we will
assume isn’t a copy of the original work I destroy my copy
Copyright infringement?
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 9
Controlling Functionality Through Copyright
How does 102(b) play into this? In no case does copyright protection for an
original work of authorship extend to any idea, procedure, process, system, method of operation, concept, principle, or discovery, regardless of the form in which it is described, explained, illustrated, or embodied in such work.
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 10
The Fair Use Analysis
How do the four factor’s apply to Accolade’s use? The purpose and character of the use? The nature of the copyrighted work? The amount used? The effect on the potential market or value
of the copyrighted work?
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 11
107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use
by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or
by any other means specified by that section,
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 12
107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use
for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research,
is not an infringement of copyright.
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 13
Classroom Guidelines
Negotiated Guidelines that are reprinted in the House Report on the 1976 Copyright Act
Parties Ad Hoc Committee of Educational Institutions and
Organizations on Copyright Law Revision Authors League of American, Inc. Association of American Publishers, Inc.
See Circular 21 from the US Copyright Office
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 14
Classroom Guidelines Single Copying for Teachers
A single copy may be made of any of the following by or for a teacher at his or her individual request for his or her scholarly research or use in teaching or preparation to teach a class:
A. A chapter from a book; B. An article from a periodical or newspaper; C. A short story, short essay or short poem, whether
or not from a collective work; D. A chart, graph, diagram, drawing, cartoon or
picture from a book, periodical, or newspaper;
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 15
Classroom Guidelines Multiple Copies for Classroom Use
Multiple copies (not to exceed in any event more than one copy per pupil in a course) may be made by or for the teacher giving the course for classroom use or discussion; provided that:
A. The copying meets the tests of brevity and spontaneity as defined below; and,
B. Meets the cumulative effect test as defined below; and,
C. Each copy includes a notice of copyright
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 16
Classroom Guidelines
Brevity: Prose (a) Either a complete article, story or essay
of less than 2,500 words, or (b) an excerpt from any prose work of not more than 1,000 words or 10% of the work, whichever is less, but in any event a minimum of 500 words.
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 17
Classroom Guidelines
Spontaneity The copying is at the instance and
inspiration of the individual teacher, and The inspiration and decision to use the work
and the moment of its use for maximum teaching effectiveness are so close in time that it would be unreasonable to expect a timely reply to a request for permission.
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 18
Classroom Guidelines Cumulative Effect
(i) The copying of the material is for only one course in the school in which the copies are made.
(ii) Not more than one short poem, article, story, essay or two excerpts may be copied from the same author, nor more than three from the same collective work or periodical volume during one class term.
(iii) There shall not be more than nine instances of such multiple copying for one course during one class term.
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 19
Classroom Guidelines
The limitations stated in “ii” and “iii” above shall not apply to current news periodicals and newspapers and current news sections of other periodicals.
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 20
Classroom Guidelines
Additional Prohibitions Notwithstanding any of the above, the following
shall be prohibited: (A) Copying shall not be used to create or to
replace or substitute for anthologies, compilations or collective works. Such replacement or substitution may occur whether copies of various works or excerpts therefrom are accumulated or reproduced and used separately.
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 21
Classroom Guidelines
(C) Copying shall not:• (a) substitute for the purchase of books,
publishers’ reprints or periodicals;• (b) be directed by higher authority; • (c) be repeated with respect to the same item by
the same teacher from term to term.
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 22
108. Reproduction by libraries and archives
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this title and
notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, it is not an infringement of copyright for a library or archives, or any of its employees acting within the scope of their employment, to reproduce no more than one copy or phonorecord of a work, except as provided in subsections (b) and (c), or to distribute such copy or phonorecord, under the conditions specified by this section, if‑‑
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 23
108 (Cont.)
(1) the reproduction or distribution is made without any purpose of direct or indirect commercial advantage;
(2) the collections of the library or archives are (i) open to the public, or (ii) available not only to researchers affiliated with the library or archives or with the institution of which it is a part, but also to other persons doing research in a specialized field; and
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 24
108 (Cont.)
(3) the reproduction or distribution of the work includes a notice of copyright that appears on the copy or phonorecord that is reproduced under the provisions of this section, or includes a legend stating that the work may be protected by copyright if no such notice can be found on the copy or phonorecord that is reproduced under the provisions of this section.
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 25
108(b)
(b) The rights of reproduction and distribution
under this section apply to three copies or phonorecords of an unpublished work duplicated solely for purposes of preservation and security or for deposit for research use in another library or archives of the type described by clause (2) of subsection (a), if‑‑
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 26
108(b)
(1) the copy or phonorecord reproduced is currently in the collections of the library or archives; and
(2) any such copy or phonorecord that is reproduced in digital format is not otherwise distributed in that format and is not made available to the public in that format outside the premises of the library or archives.
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 27
108(c)
(c) The right of reproduction under this section
applies to three copies or phonorecords of a published work duplicated solely for the purpose of replacement of a copy or phonorecord that is damaged, deteriorating, lost, or stolen, or if the existing format in which the work is stored has become obsolete, if‑‑
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 28
108(c)
(1) the library or archives has, after a reasonable effort, determined that an unused replacement cannot be obtained at a fair price; and
(2) any such copy or phonorecord that is reproduced in digital format is not made available to the public in that format outside the premises of the library or archives in lawful possession of such copy.
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 29
108(c)
For purposes of this subsection, a format shall be considered obsolete if the machine or device necessary to render perceptible a work stored in that format is no longer manufactured or is no longer reasonably available in the commercial marketplace.
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 30
108(d)
(d) The rights of reproduction and distribution under
this section apply to a copy, made from the collection of a library or archives where the user makes his or her request or from that of another library or archives, of no more than one article or other contribution to a copyrighted collection or periodical issue, or to a copy or phonorecord of a small part of any other copyrighted work, if‑‑
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 31
108(d) (1) the copy or phonorecord becomes the property
of the user, and the library or archives has had no notice that the copy or phonorecord would be used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research; and
(2) the library or archives displays prominently, at the place where orders are accepted, and includes on its order form, a warning of copyright in accordance with requirements that the Register of Copyrights shall prescribe by regulation.
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 32
108(e) (e)
The rights of reproduction and distribution under this section apply to the entire work, or to a substantial part of it, made from the collection of a library or archives where the user makes his or her request or from that of another library or archives, if the library or archives has first determined, on the basis of a reasonable investigation, that a copy or phonorecord of the copyrighted work cannot be obtained at a fair price, if‑‑
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 33
108(e) (1) the copy or phonorecord becomes the property
of the user, and the library or archives has had no notice that the copy or phonorecord would be used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research; and
(2) the library or archives displays prominently, at the place where orders are accepted, and includes on its order form, a warning of copyright in accordance with requirements that the Register of Copyrights shall prescribe by regulation.
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 34
108(f)
(f) Nothing in this section‑‑
(1) shall be construed to impose liability for copyright infringement upon a library or archives or its employees for the unsupervised use of reproducing equipment located on its premises: Provided, That such equipment displays a notice that the making of a copy may be subject to the copyright law;
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 35
108(f)
(2) excuses a person who uses such reproducing equipment or who requests a copy or phonorecord under subsection (d) from liability for copyright infringement for any such act, or for any later use of such copy or phonorecord, if it exceeds fair use as provided by section 107;
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 36
108(f)
(3) shall be construed to limit the reproduction and distribution by lending of a limited number of copies and excerpts by a library or archives of an audiovisual news program, subject to clauses (1), (2), and (3) of subsection (a); or
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 37
108(f)
(4) in any way affects the right of fair use as provided by section 107, or any contractual obligations assumed at any time by the library or archives when it obtained a copy or phonorecord of a work in its collections.
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 38
Copying
Hypo Prof checks out a journal from the library Prof stands in front of the copier and make
a copy Copyright violation?
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 39
Four Factors
Basics Non-transformative Copy of entire work Item copied is academic article
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 40
Assessing the Fourth Factor
Harper & Row (1985) “Finally, the Act focuses on ‘the effect of the
use upon the potential market for or value of the work.’ This last factor is undoubtedly the single most important element of fair use.”
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 41
Assessing the Fourth Factor
But See Campbell (1994) “Nor may the four statutory factors be
treated in isolation, one from another. All are to be explored, and the results weighed together, in light of the purposes of copyright.”
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 42
Assessing the Fourth Factor
Defining Markets In Harper, effect on first serial rights In Campbell, effect on market for licensed
rap version of Pretty Woman
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 43
Understanding the Fourth Factor
What is the right market The market for each of the books in
question? The market for permission fees for
selections from the books? Circularity?
If you can use without paying, you can’t sell it (free beats fee)
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 44
Understanding the Fourth Factor
Does the copyright holder control fair use? If the copyright holder offers the use for a fee, if
free beats fee, copyright holder can’t sell and then fair use impairs market
Do we need to know something about the selection rules for content? If profs won’t assign work with permission fees,
free (fair) use doesn’t result in loss of fees
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 45
Allocating the Burden of Proof
Sony (US, 1984) If use is commercial, infringer bears burden
on fourth factor If use is noncommercial, copyright holder
bears burden
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 46
Consent and Fair Use
Scope of Permissible Photocopying What role does the copyright holder’s
consent play in this?
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 48
JLE: Consent Code
© 2005 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. 0022-2186/2005/4801-0002$01.50
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 49
Copying and Agents
Hypo Prof checks out a journal from the library Prof asks her research assistant to make a
copy Copyright violation? Who is liable for it?
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 50
Copying and Professional Agents
Hypo Prof checks out a journal from the library Prof asks Kinkos to make a copy
Copyright violation? Who is liable for it?
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 51
Assigned Reading
Hypo Prof assembles reading list Prof puts original versions of readings on
two-hour reserve at school library Students check out readings and copy them Each student gets one copy
Copyright violation?
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 52
Assigned Reading
Hypo Prof assembles reading list Prof copies original of journal article and
distributes copy to each student Each student gets one copy
Copyright violation?
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 53
Assigned Reading
Hypo Prof assembles reading list Prof has Kinkos make copies Each student get one copy
Copyright violation? Who is liable?
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 54
JLE Copyright Beyond Fair Use
“The code on the first page of an article in this journal indicates the copyright owner’s consent that copies of the article may be made beyond those permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law provided that copies are made only for personal or internal use or for the personal or internal use of specific clients and provided that the copier pay the stated per-copy fee through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. …
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 55
JLE
To request permission for other kinds of copying, such as copying for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new collective works, or for resale, kindly write to the managing editor … .”
April 19, 2023 Copyright © 2010 Randal C. Picker 56
Copying and Watermarking
Hypo A technology is developed such that a
paper can be imprinted with a copying consent code
Photocopying machines could recognize that code and copy or not copy accordingly
Would the existence of this technology alter the fair use analysis?