colonic pro-inflammatory macrophages cause insulin ... · colonic pro-inflammatory macrophages...
TRANSCRIPT
Cell Metabolism, Volume 24
Supplemental Information
Colonic Pro-inflammatory Macrophages
Cause Insulin Resistance in an Intestinal
Ccl2/Ccr2-Dependent Manner
Yoshinaga Kawano, Jun Nakae, Nobuyuki Watanabe, Tetsuhiro Kikuchi, SanshiroTateya, Yoshikazu Tamori, Mari Kaneko, Takaya Abe, Masafumi Onodera, and HiroshiItoh
2
SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Generation of Tissue-specific Ccr2 Knockout Mice
The mouse genomic DNA clone containing exons 1, 2, and 3 of the Ccr2 gene locus
was obtained from a BAC clone CH25-320O8 (BACPAC Resource) derived from the
C57BL/6 mouse strain. The Ccr2 targeting construct consisted of 9.1 kb of the genomic
sequence that was immediately 5’ of the first exon, followed by exon 1, intron 1, exon 2,
a 2.3-kb Neo-cassette, a frt-flanked Neo-resistance gene, and exon 3. A 1763-bp of
genomic sequence containing the open reading frame in exon 3 of the Ccr2 gene was
flanked by the loxP sequence. The SalI-linearized targeting vector was electroporated
into TT2 embryonic stem (ES) cells (Yagi et al., 1993) as described previously.
G418-resistant clones were isolated and screened by PCR and Southern blotting.
Seven out of 192 G418-resistant clones had undergone the desired homologous
recombination. Positive clones were injected into CD-1 8-cell stage embryos, and the
chimeric male offspring were mated to C57BL/6 females, obtaining Ccr2 conditional
knockout mice (Accession No. CDB0610K:
http://www2.clst.riken.jp/arg/mutant%20mice%20list.html). Primers for detection of the
wild-type allele (440 bp) and the loxP allele (600 bp) are: 5’-
GCCTATTCTCTTCTGTATCTC-3’ and 5’- TGGATGAACTGAGGTAACAT-3’ (Figure
S4A-S4D).
Immunohistochemistry, Immunofluorescence and Histological Analysis
For histological analysis, we removed the white adipose tissue and colon from mice,
fixed the specimens in 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded them in paraffin. After
rehydration and permeabilization, we stained the specimens with hematoxylin and eosin.
Immunofluorescence was performed as described previously (Kawano et al., 2012)
using anti-CD68 (Dako Denmark A/S), anti-Claudin-1 (Invitrogen), or anti-ASC
(Santa-Cruz) antibodies. After washing with PBS, the sections were sequentially
3
incubated with secondary antibody and visualized using the Liquid DAB Substrate
Chromogen System (DakoCytomation) for CD68 single-staining in white adipose tissue
and colon. Crypt depth, the number of goblet cells in the colon, and the size and number
of adipocytes in white adipose tissue were determined using a fluorescence microscope
(BZ-8000, 9000, KEYENCE) by manually tracing at least more than 300 adipocytes for
each genotype.
Isolation of Liver Macrophages
The liver was removed and cut into small pieces with scissors, and then filtered
through 100μm nylon mesh. The cells were collected in a new 15 ml tube and incubated
with 10mM EDTA and Collagenase B (Roche) with gentle shaking. After incubation with
collagenase, the supernatants were centrifuged at 1700 rpm and washed twice with
PBS. The cell pellets were re-suspended in 40% Percoll, overlaid on 80% Percoll, and
centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 20min at room temperature. The white interphase was
collected in a new tube, and centrifuged, and analyzed by FACS immediately.
Isolation of the Stromal Vascular Fraction
The epididymal fat was removed, transferred to a 50ml tube containing KRHAG buffer
(1M KCl, 1M CaCl2, 1M KH2PO4, 1M MgSO4, 5% BSA, 200 mM HEPES (pH 7.8), 200
mM glucose), and cut into small pieces. The pieces were incubated with Collagenase
type Ⅰ (Wako) in KRHAG buffer (3.0mg/1.5ml) for 45 min at 37oC with gentle shaking.
After filtering through 100μm nylon, the supernatant was centrifuged at 1500rpm for
5min at 4℃ and washed twice in Pharm Lyse (BD Bioscience) buffer. After hemolytic
incubation with lysing solution (BD Bioscience), the cells were washed twice again and
analyzed by FACS immediately.
RNA Isolation and Real-time PCR
Isolation of total RNA was performed using the SV Total RNA Isolation System
4
(Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. We performed reverse
transcription using the PrimeScriptTM RT Reagent Kit, and real-time PCR using the
SYBR GREEN detection protocol by STRATAGENE (An Agilent Technologies division,
Germany). All primer sequences are available upon request.
Western Blotting
For Western blotting, we homogenized tissues as described previously (Nakae et al.,
2012). After centrifugation to remove insoluble material, the proteins in 150 μg of lysate
were separated using 8% SDS-PAGE for detection of p-Akt and Akt (Cell signal) or 14%
SDS-PAGE for detection of Claudin-1 and procaspase-1 p10 (sc-514, Santa Cruz), and
immunized using the indicated antibodies.
H2O2 Production
The colon and epididymal fat were dissected from age-matched male C57BL/6J mice
fed either a NCD or a HFD for 4 or 24 weeks. We measured peroxidase activity in the
colon and epididymal fat using with the Amplex Red Hydrogen Peroxide/Peroxidase
Assay Kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Intracellular Staining of TNF-α
Intracellular staining of TNF-α was performed using the Fix and Permeabilization Kit
(eBioscience). First, cells were stimulated with 1μg/ml LPS for 4 h with BFA added to
the cell suspension for the final 2 hours. Next, the cells were stained with surface
marker antibodies, including F4/80(BM8, APC, BioLegend), CD11b (M1/70, APC-Cy7,
BioLegend), and CD11c (N418, FITC, BioLegend), washed with PBS, and fixed in
formaldehyde. The cells were permeabilized in PBS containing 0.5% saponin and 0.5%
BSA (Sigma-Aldrich), stained with antibody for intracellular TNFα marker (MP-6XT22,
PerCP-Cy5.5, BD Biosciences), and analyzed by flow cytometry.
5
Metagenomic analysis of 16S rRNA
To analyze the microbial population from NCD, HFD, M-Ccr2KO, Vil-Ccl2KO mice in this
study, metagenomics analysis using 16S rRNA sequencing was performed. DNA sample
for assessment of the microbial community was extracted from lyophilized cecal content
using the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen). Illumina Miseq was used to sequence
complex microbial populations. Sequence data was processed and filtered by the
quantitative insights into microbial ecology (QIIME, Ver 1.8.0.) Chimeric sequences were
removed. We used a Cut-adapt (Ver 1.1) to trim any over-read, and paired-end
sequences from DNA sequencing reads. A total of 110,000 reads were generated per
sample from these mice after filtering. Taxonomy is assigned to each OTU based on the
16S rDNA database Greengenes (Ver 13.8) in the closed-reference manner. We excluded
sequences that were not between 200 and 1000 nucleotides in length and clustered into
Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs). OTU analyses were performed by clustering at the
similarity 97% level with UCLUST. Beta diversity was measured using the weighted/
unweighted UniFrac analysis. UniFrac distance matrics, which was were used to compute
average distances within and between various groups of samples, were generated using by
QIIME’s BaseSpace. Weighted UniFrac PCoA plots were used to visualize the similarities
or dissimilarities of variables. Hierarchical clustering method was used to produce UPGMA
(Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean) tree in genus level.
Endotoxin Measurement
The concentration of endotoxin in the portal vein was measured using the endotoxin
assay kit (ToxinSensorTM Chromogenic LAL Endotoxin Assay kit) according to the
manufacturer's protocol.
Measurement of Cytokines in the Portal Vein
Serum levels of IL18 and IL1β in the portal vein were measured using the mouse ELISA
6
kits (R&D SYSTEM for IL18 and mouse ELISA kit Quantikine, R&D SYSTEM for IL1β).
Isolation of Intestinal Epithelial Cell for Real-time PCR
The pieces of the colon and small intestine dissected from each mouse were incubated
in 10 mM DTT and 0.5M EDTA in 1.5% FBS-HANKS at 37oC for 30 minutes. The
supernatant was then collected and filtered through 100 μm nylon mesh and centrifuged
to pellet. The pellets were washed four times and resuspended in the RNA lysis buffer of
the SV Total RNA Isolation System (Promega)
Magnetic Activated Cell Sorting
Mononuclear cells were isolated from the colon and incubated with CD11b magnetic
beads (Miltenyi Biotec) for positive selection. The CD11b+ cells were cultured with (2×
106 cells/ml) in HANKs’ Balanced Salt solution supplemented with 1.5% FCS and 1%
penicillin/streptomycin.
Intestinal Permeability
Fluorescein-isothiocyanate-conjugated dextran (FD4: Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK)
was administered to each mouse at 0.4 mg/g body weight by oral gavage. After 4 h,
blood was collected from the portal vein and diluted with an equal volume of PBS. The
concentration of FD4 dextran was measured at 485 nm using a spectrophoto microplate
reader.
Co-culture of Caco-2 and CD11b+ Cell
Caco-2 cells were cultured with DMEM supplemented with 1.5% FBS and 1%
penicillin/streptomycin for 20 days. Differentiated Caco-2 cells at 80% confluence were
seeded on the basal side of the NuncTM CC insert 12-well plate (polycarbonate
membrane, < 1.7×106 pores/cm2 ). CD11b+ cells sorted from the colons of mice fed a
7
NCD stimulated with a mixture of IL-1β, IL-18, and LPS were added to polycarbonate
membrane inserts. After 36 hours, Caco-2 cells were harvested and centrifuged and the
cell pellets suspended in RIPA lysis buffer.
SUPPLEMENTAL REFERENCES
Kawano, Y., Nakae, J., Watanabe, N., Fujisaka, S., Iskandar, K., Sekioka, R., Hayashi,
Y., Tobe, K., Kasuga, M., Noda, T., et al. (2012). Loss of Pdk1-Foxo1 signaling in
myeloid cells predisposes to adipose tissue inflammation and insulin resistance.
Diabetes 61, 1935-1948.
Nakae, J., Cao, Y., Hakuno, F., Takemori, H., Kawano, Y., Sekioka, R., Abe, T.,
Kiyonari, H., Tanaka, T., Sakai, J., et al. (2012). Novel repressor regulates insulin
sensitivity through interaction with Foxo1. EMBO J 31, 2275-2295.
Sakaue, H., Ogawa, W., Matsumoto, M., Kuroda, S., Takata, M., Sugimoto, T.,
Spiegelman, B.M., and Kasuga, M. (1998). Posttranscriptional control of adipocyte
differentiation through activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase. J Biol Chem 273,
28945-28952.
Yagi, T., Tokunaga, T., Furuta, Y., Nada, S., Yoshida, M., Tsukada, T., Saga, Y.,
Takeda, N., Ikawa, Y., and Aizawa, S. (1993). A novel ES cell line, TT2, with high
germline-differentiating potency. Anal Biochem 214, 70-76.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
Il1b
Figure S1
00.5
11.5
22.5
3
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
Emr1
0
1
2
3
4
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
Ly6c
0
1
2
3
4
5
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
Cx3cr1
0
0.5
1
1.5
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n Tnf
0
0.5
1
1.5
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
Il18
**
D
0
0.5
1
1.5
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
Foxp3
*
* *
*
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
Ccl2
Normal chow High fat diet
NC
HF24W4W
HF4W
HF8W
HF12W
HF16W
A B Length of small intestine
NC
HF4W
01020304050
Length(cm)
p=0.052C
E
Epididymal fat
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
NC
HF4
WH
F8W
HF1
2WH
F16W
HF2
0WRel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
Il1b
0
1
2
3
4
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
Emr1
0
1
2
3
4
5
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
Ccl2
**
***
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
Tnf
*
A Mesentery fat
0
1
2
3
4
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
Emr1
**
*
012345
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
Ccl2
* ***
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
Tnf
* **
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
Il1b
**
Mesenteric fat
F
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
Emr1
00.5
11.5
22.5
3
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
Tnf
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
Il1b*
0123456
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
Ccl2
****
*
* *Liver
G
Figure S1. Related to Figure 1. HFD analysis of small intestine. (A) The protocol for evaluating sequential change of intestinal immune state during HFD for 24 weeks. (B)Representative image of the small intestine from NCD and HFD for 4 weeks (C)The length of the small intestine from age-matched C57Bl6/J mice (n=6) fed with HFD compared with NCD. Data are expressed as mean + SEM. P-value by one-way ANOVA.(D) Normalized gene expression of inflammatory related genes in the small intestine of age-matched C57Bl6/J mice fed with HFD compared with NCD. Data are normalized to β-actin expression and represent means + SEM from 8-10 mice in each group. *P<0.05 by one-way ANOVA. (E, F and G) Related to Figure 1. HFD-induced Pro-inflammatory Changes in Adipose Tissue and Liver. Normalized expression of inflammation-related genes (Emr1, Ccl2, Tnf, Il1b) in epididiymal fat (E), mesenteric fat (F) and liver (G) from age-matched C57Bl6/J mice fed with HFD compared with NCD. Data represent as the ratio to control in each gene. Data are means + SEM. *P<0.05 by one-way ANOVA.
CX3CR1
Ly6c
SiglecF
98.9%
100%
2.68%
NC HF4W
CX3CR1
Ly6c
SiglecF
83.1%
87.7%
8.33%
B
0123456
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n0
1
2
3
4
5
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
0
0.5
1
1.5
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
*
**
Ly6c
**
**CX3CR1
SiglecF(Eosinophil)
A
Figure S2
TNFα
CD11b
NC HF4W
C
NC HF12w
TNFα
4.76% 30.7%
SSC-A
D
02000400060008000
100001200014000160001800020000
Num
ber o
f F4
/80+
CD
11b+
CD
11c-
TNFα
high
(in li
ving
F4/
80+ c
ell 1
05 c
ell)
Number of F4/80+CD11b+CD11c-TNFα+ cell
n.s.
**
n.s.n.s.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
NC CD11b+ MACS cell
HF4W CD11b+
MACS cell
TNFα
( p
g/m
l )
TNFα in cell culture supernatants
n.s.
E F
Figure S2. Related to Figure 2. HFD-induced Changes of Ly6c, Cx3cr1, and Siglecf Expression in Colon and FACS Analysis of F4/80+CD11b+CD11c-TNFαhigh from the Colon of NCD and HFD Mice.(A) Representative FACS analysis of Ly6c, CX3CR1, SiglecF among F4/80+CD11b+CD11c- cells in colonic LP from mice fed with NCD (the left panel) and HFD for 4 weeks (the right panel). (B) Normalized expression of Ly6c, Cx3cr1, and Siglecf in colon from age-matched C57Bl6/J mice fed with HFD compared with NCD. Data represent as the ratio to control in each gene. Data are means + SEM. *P<0.05 by one-way ANOVA.(C and D) Representative FACS analysis of F4/80+CD11b+CD11c-TNFαhigh cell in colonic LP from mice fed with a NCD and with a HFD for 4 weeks (C), and from mice fed with a NCD and a HFD for 12 weeks (D).(E) Absolute number of F4/80+CD11b+CD11c-TNFαhigh cell in living 105 F4/80 positive cell. Data are means + SEM. *P<0.05 by one-way ANOVA.(F) Measurement of TNFα production by ELISA in culture supernatants of MACS sorted CD11+ cells from NCD and HFD for 4 weeks. Data are expressed as mean + SEM. n.s. by one-way ANOVA.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 30 60 90 120
% o
f B
lood
glu
cose
(0 m
in )
Time (min)
ITT
050
100150200250300350400
0 30 60 90 120
Bloo
dglucose(m
g/dl)
Time(min)
IPGTTB
05
101520253035
4W 5W 6W 7W 8W 9W 10W
11W
12W
13W
14W
Bod
y w
eigh
t (g)
Age (week)
Body weightA C
Figure S3
D
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
g / B
W
HF ControlHF M-Ccr2KOHF M-Ccr2KO
00.20.40.60.8
11.2
fat free mass
g/B
WControlM-Ccr2KOHF M-Ccr2KOHF control
Fat free mass
F
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 15 30
Insu
lin (n
g/m
l)
Time (min)
Insulin
contCcr2LysMHF controlHF M-Ccr2KO
G H
012345678
0 15 30
Insu
lin (n
g/m
l)
Time ( min )
Insulin
HF controlHF M-Ccr2KOHF M-Ccr2KO
0
100
200
300
400
500
0 30 60 90 120
Blo
od g
luco
se (
mg/
dl )
Time (min)
OGTT
HF controlHF M-Ccr2KOHF M-Ccr2KO
*
** *
ILiver TG
n.s.
05
1015202530
Live
r TG
(mg/
g tis
sue)
K
0200400600800
10001200
Cel
l num
ber o
f Ep
idid
ymal
fat
F4/80+CD11b+CD11+CD206-
cell in epididymal fat
n.s.
J
Mesenteric fat
0
2
4
6
8
Emr1 Ccr2 Ccl2 Tnfa Il1b Il18 Ifng Il17 Foxp3 Il10 Il4 Siglecf
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne
expr
essi
on
NCHF Control HF M-Ccr2KO
*
* *
*
* * *
*
*
HF M-Ccr2KO
Tnf
00.5
11.5
22.5
3
Emr1 Itgax Tnfa Il1b Il18 Arg1 Cd206 Il4
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne
expr
essi
on
M-Ccr2KO MACS-sortedCD11b+ adipose tissue macrophage
Tnf
L
0
1
2
3
RelaBv
egene
expression
Skeletal Muscle controlCcr2LysM
*
HF M-Ccr2KOHF control
M
E
HF M-Ccr2KOHF control
Figure S3. Related to Figure 3. Metabolic Phenotypes, FACS Analysis, and Gene Expression Analysis of M-Ccr2KO.(A) Body weight. (B) IPGTT. (C) ITT in M-Ccr2KO fed with a NCD. The black rhombus and green square indicate control and M-Ccr2KO, respectively. Data represent means + SEM of 3 mice in each genotype.(D) Fat composition of epididymal fat, subcutaneous fat, mesentery fat, perirenal fat and brown adipose tissue from NC, HF control and M-Ccr2KO. Data are % of body weight and expressed as mean + SEM. (E) Fat free mass. Data are defined as total body mass except for epididymal fat, subcutaneous fat, mesentery fat, perirenal fat and brown adipose tissue and are expressed as mean + SEM. (F) Insulin secretion of control and M-Ccr2KO mice fed with a HFD for 10 weeks during IPGTT. Data are means + SEM of 8-10 mice in each genotype. (G) Oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) of control and M-Ccr2KO mice fed with HFD for 10 weeks (n=10). Data are means + SEM. *P<0.05 by two-way ANOVA with Fisher's test.(H) Insulin secretion of control and M-Ccr2KO mice fed with HFD for 10 weeks during oGTT. Data are means + SEM of 8-10 mice in each genotype. (I) Hepatic triglyceride content of control and M-Ccr2KO mice fed with HFD for 10 weeks. (II) Data are means + SEM of 6-8 mice. n.s. by one-way ANOVA.(J) Absolute number of F4/80+CD11b+CD11c+CD206- cell in whole epididymal fat. Data are means + SEM. n.s. by one-way ANOVA.(K) Normalized expression of inflammation-related genes in mesentery fat from NC control, HF control, and M-Ccr2KO mice fed with HFD for 10 weeks. Data represent as the ratio to control in each gene and are means + SEM of 6 mice in each genotype. *P<0.05 by one-way ANOVA.(L) Normalized expression of inflammation-related genes in CD11b+ cell in stromal vascular fraction of epididymal fat from control and M-Ccr2KO mice fed with HFD for 10 weeks. Data represent as the ratio to control in each gene and are means + SEM of 4 mice in each genotype. *P<0.05 by one-way ANOVA. (M) Normalized expression of inflammation-related genes in skeletal muscle from control and M-Ccr2KO mice fed with HFD for 10 weeks. Data represent as the ratio to control in each gene and are means + SEM of 3-5 mice in each genotype. *P<0.05 by one-way ANOVA.
Small intestine
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
Emr1 Ccr2 Ccl2 Tnfa Il1b Il18 Ifng Il17 Foxp3 Il10 Il4 Siglecf
NC
HF control
HF M-Ccr2KOHF M-Ccr2KO
Tnf
Figure S4
A
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Weig
ht
(g)
Cecum
*
n.s.
B
*
Rela
tiv
e g
en
e e
xp
ressio
n
NCD HFD Control
HFD M-Ccr2KO
Firmicutes
Bacteroidetes
Proteobacteria
C
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100% OthersDeferribacteraceaeDehalobacteriaceaeAlcaligenaceaePeptostreptococcaceaeRhodothermaceaeOdoribacteraceaeSphingobacteriaceaePrevotellaceaeVerrucomicrobiaceaeFlavobacteriaceaeLactobacillaceaeCoriobacteriaceaeClostridiaceaeHelicobacteraceaeErysipelotrichaceaePorphyromonadaceaeBacteroidaceaeDesulfovibrionaceaeRuminococcaceaeLachnospiraceae
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Bacteroidaceae
% o
f to
tal * *
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Deferribacteraceae
% o
f to
tal
* *
D
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Bacteroidetes
% o
f to
tal
0102030405060708090
100
Firmicutes
% o
f to
tal
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Proteobacteria
% o
f to
tal
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Deferribacteres
* *
% o
f to
tal
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
1
Actinobacteria
*
*
% o
f to
tal
n.s.n.s.
n.s.
EF
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
-0.5 0 0.5 1
NCDHFD controlHFD M-Ccr2KO
PC1(43.8%)
PC
2(4
2.9
%)
G H
Figure S4. Related to Figure 4. Analysis of Cecum and Small Intestine of M-Ccr2KO(A) The weight of the cecum from NC control, HF control, and M-Ccr2KO mice fed with a HFD for 10 weeks. Data represent as the ratio to control in each gene and are means + SEM of 4 mice in each genotype. *P < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA.(B) Normalized expression of inflammation-related genes in the small intestine from NCcontrol, HF control, and M-Ccr2KO mice fed with HFD for 10 weeks. Data represent as the ratio to control in each gene and are means + SEM of 6 mice in each genotype. *P<0.05 by one-way ANOVA.(C, D, E and F) The 16S rRNA Sequencing Analysis of Microbiota at the Phylum and Family Level in M-Ccr2KO(C) Pie charts showing relative abundances of bacterial phyla in the cecum microbiota of control mice fed a NCD (n=4), fed a HFD (n=4), and M-Ccr2KO fed a HFD (n=4). (D) The 16S rRNA sequencing analysis of the cecum microbiota at the phylum level with Illumina MiSeq in Paired-End mode (150×2 bp) of cecal DNA product from control fed with a NCD, HFD, M-Ccr2KO fed with a HFD. These data were expressed as a percentage of total DNA sequence from each Phylum of microbiota and mean + SEM. *P<0.05 by one-way ANOVA. (E) Bar plot analysis on family taxon. (F) The 16S rRNA sequencing analysis of the cecum microbiota at the family level. These data were expressed as a percentage of total DNA sequence from each Family of microbiota and mean + SEM. *P<0.05 by one-way ANOVA. (G) Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) of weighted UniFrac distances from the cecum microbiota of control mice fed a NCD (n=4), fed a HFD (n=8), and M-Ccr2KO fed a HFD (n=4) (H) Hierarchical clustering dendrogram of the cecum microbiota based on genus-level classifications.
Figure S5
8W ♂HF start
HF0W Tamoxifen
1mg/day i.p.5days
HF12W IPGTT, ITTanalysis
HF6W Tamoxifen
1mg/day i.p.5days
A
500bp
200bp
Control Vil-Ccl2KO
Control PCR
RecombinationPCR
C
Control PCR Ccl2-Ex1-S1 - Ccl2-Ex1-AS1recombination PCR Ccl2-Ex1-S2 - Ccl2-6AS
Ccl2
exon1 exon2 exon3 RFPloxP loxP
Functional C-C domain
B
00.20.40.60.8
1
Fat free mass
g/B
W
NCcontrol HFVil-Ccl2 KO
E
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 15 30
Insu
lin (n
g/m
l)
Time (min)
controlCcl2villin
0
100
200
300
400
0 30 60 90 120Blo
od g
luco
se (m
g/dl
)
Time (min)
OGTT HF controlVil-Ccl2KO
* *
00.5
11.5
22.5
3
0 15 30
Insu
lin (n
g/m
l)
Time(min )
Insulin(OGTT)
HF controlHF Vil-Ccl2KO
Insulin (IPGTT)
00.005
0.010.015
0.020.025
g / B
W
NCcontrol HFVil-Ccl2 KO
*
* ***
*
* n.s.
HF Vil-Ccl2KOHF control
HF controlHF Vil-Ccl2KO
HF Vil-Ccl2KO02468
101214
Live
r TG
(mg/
g tis
sue)
HF Vil-Ccl2KO
HF Vil-Ccl2KOHF control
00.10.20.30.40.50.6
Wei
ght (
g)
Cecum*
n.s.
D F
G H I J
Figure S5. Related to Figure 5. Generation and Analysis of Vil-Ccl2KO (A) Protocol of HFD analysis of Vil-Ccl2KO. (B and C) Recombination of conditional Ccl2-targeted allele (Ccl2-RFPflox/flox) by intestine-specific tamoxifen-inducible Cre transgenic mice (Vil-Cre-ERT2). (B) Construct of Ccl2-targeted allele and primers for control and recombination PCR. (C) Representative data for recombination PCR on genomic DNA isolated from various tissues of Vil-Ccl2KO compared with control mice.(D) Analysis of fat composition of epididymal fat, subcutaneous fat, mesentery fat, perirenal fat and brown adipose tissue from NC control, HF control, and Vil-Ccl2KO. Data are expressed as mean + SEM. *P<0.05 by one-way ANOVA.(E) Fat free mass. Data are defined as total body mass except for epididymal fat, subcutaneous fat, mesentery fat, perirenal fat and brown adipose tissue from NC, HF control and Vil-Ccl2KO and are expressed as mean + SEM.(F) Insulin secretion of control and Vil-Ccl2KO mice during IPGTT. Data represent means + SEM of 8 mice in each genotype. (G) OGTT of control and Vil-Ccl2KO mice fed with HFD for 10 weeks (n=10). Data are means + SEM. *P<0.05 by two-way ANOVA with Fisher's test.(H) Insulin secretion of control and Vil-Ccl2KO mice fed with HFD for 10 weeks during oGTT. Data are means + SEM of 8-10 mice in each genotype.(I) Hepatic triglyceride content of NC control, HF control, and Vil-Ccl2KO mice fed with HFD for 12 weeks. Data are means + SEM of 8 mice. *P<0.05 by one-way ANOVA.(J) The weight of the cecum from NC control, HF control and Vil-Ccl2 KO mice fed with HFD for 10 weeks. Data represent as the ratio to control in each gene and are means + SEM of 4 mice in each genotype. *P < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA.
Figure S6
Small intestineA
C
01020304050607080
Con
cent
ratio
n In
por
tal v
ein
(pg/
ml)
D
00.5
11.5
22.5
3
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
NCHF control HF Vil-Ccl2KO
** *
0
2
4
6
8
10
Emr1 Ccr2 Ccl2 Tnfa Il1b Il18 Ifng Il17 Foxp3 Il10 Il4 SiglecfRel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
Liver
** *
* *
IL1β
B
n.s.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Arg1 Mr Cd163
Rel
ativ
e ge
ne e
xpre
ssio
n
NCHF controlHF Vil-Ccl2KOHF Vil-Ccl2KO
Colon
HFD Control
HFD Vil-Ccl2KO
F
05
101520253035
Bacteroidetes
01020304050607080
Firmicutes
05
10152025303540
Proteobacteria
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.8
Deferribacteres
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.8
Tenericutes
00.05
0.10.15
0.20.25
0.30.35
Synergistetes
**
* ** * * *n.s.
n.s.
% o
f tot
al
% o
f tot
al
% o
f tot
al
% o
f tot
al
% o
f tot
al
% o
f tot
al
0%20%40%60%80%
100%OthersDeferribacteraceaeDehalobacteriaceaeAlcaligenaceaePeptostreptococcaceaeRhodothermaceaeOdoribacteraceaeSphingobacteriaceaePrevotellaceaeVerrucomicrobiaceaeFlavobacteriaceaeLactobacillaceaeCoriobacteriaceaeClostridiaceaeHelicobacteraceaeErysipelotrichaceaePorphyromonadaceaeBacteroidaceaeDesulfovibrionaceaeRuminococcaceaeLachnospiraceae
0
5
10
15
20
25
Desulfovibrionaceae
**
% o
f tot
al
02468
101214
Helicobacteraceae
*
*
% o
f tot
al
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.8
Deferribacteraceae
* *
% o
f tot
al
HF Vil-Ccl2KO
-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.1
00.10.20.30.40.50.6
-0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
NCDHFD controlHFD Vil-Ccl2KO
PC1(51.0%)
PC2(
(38.
0%)
E
G
H
I
Firmicutes BacteroidetesProteobacter
Figure S6. Related to Figure 6. Analysis of Inflammation Related Gene Expression of Intestine and Liver in Vil-Ccl2KO(A) Normalized expression of inflammation-related genes in the small intestine from NC.Control, HF control, and Vil-Ccl2KO mice fed with HFD for 10 weeks. Data represent as the ratio to control in each gene and are means + SEM of 6 mice in each genotype. *P<0.05 by one-way ANOVA.(B) Normalized expression of anti-inflammatory macrophage-related genes in the colon from NC control, HF control, and Vil-Ccl2KO mice fed with HFD for 10 weeks. Data represent as the ratio to control in each gene and are means + SEM of 4-6 mice in each genotype. (C) Normalized expression of inflammation-related genes in liver from NC control, HF control, and Vil-Ccl2KO fed with HFD for 12 weeks. Data are normalized to b-actin expression level and represent as the ratio to control in each gene and are means + SEM of 6 mice in each genotype. *P<0.05 by one-way ANOVA.(D) The concentration of IL1b in the portal vein from control and Vil-Ccl2KO fed with HFD for 12 weeks. Data are means + SEM of 4-6 mice in each genotype. n.s by one-way ANOVA.(E) The 16S rRNA Sequencing Analysis of Microbiota at the Phylum and Family Level in Vil-Ccl2KO. Pie charts showing relative abundances of bacterial phyla in the cecum microbiota of control (n=4) and Vil-Ccl2KO fed a HFD (n=4). (F) The 16S rRNA sequencing analysis of the cecum microbiota at the phylum level with Illumina MiSeq in Paired-End mode (150×2 bp) of cecal DNA product from control fed with a NCD (n=4), HFD (n=4), Vil-Ccl2KO fed with a HFD (n=4). These data were expressed as a percentage of total DNA sequence from each Phylum of microbiota and mean + SEM. *P<0.05 by one-way ANOVA.(G) Bar plot analysis on family taxon.(H) The 16S rRNA sequencing analysis of the cecum microbiota at the family level. These data were expressed as a percentage of total DNA sequence from each Family of microbiota and mean + SEM. *P<0.05 by one-way ANOVA. (I)Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) of weighted UniFrac distances from the cecum microbiota of control mice fed a NCD (n=4), fed a HFD (n=4), and Vil-Ccl2KO fed a HFD (n=4).
Figure S7
A
020406080
100120140160
Adi
pocy
te n
umbe
r
Adipocyte size (μmm2)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Num
ber o
f F4
/80+
CD
11b+
CD
11c+
CD
206-
cell
( / 1
05 S
VF to
tal c
ell)
*
B
020406080
100120140
Seru
m C
cl2
(pg/
ml)
Serum Ccl2C
BloodHF Vil-Ccl2KO
D BloodHF control
Ly6c
Ccr2
Ly6c
Ccr2
1.42%
1.46%
P1
00.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.61.8
% o
f P1
n.s.
n.s.
EBlood
Ly6c+Ccr2+ cell
0200400600800
10001200140016001800
Num
ber
(/ 10
5 liv
ing
bloo
d ce
lls)
n.s.
FBlood
Ly6c+Ccr2+ cell
Adipocyte size (µm2)
Figure S7. Related to Figure 6. Adipocyte Size, FACS Analysis, and Serum Ccl2 Concentration of Vil-Ccl2KO(A) Histogram of adipocyte size and number of control (blue bar) and Vil-Ccl2KO (yellow bar) fed with HFD for 12 weeks. (B) Absolute number of F4/80+CD11b+CD11c+CD206- cell among 106 SVF total cell from control and Vil-Ccl2KO fed with HFD for 12 weeks. Data are means + SEM. *P<0.05 by one-way ANOVA.(C) Serum Ccl2 concentration of control and Vil-Ccl2KO fed with HFD for 12 weeks. n.s. by one-way ANOVA.(D) Representative FACS analysis of blood monocyte, expressed as Ly6c+Ccr2+ cell in blood from mice fed with control (the upper panel) and Vil-Ccl2KO (the bottom panel) fed with HFD.(E and F) Percentage (E) and Absolute number (/105 living blood cell) (F) of blood monocyte from mice fed with control and Vil-Ccl2KO fed with HFD
Milk Casein
L-cystein
Corn starch
Maltodextrin
Sucrose
Soybean oil
Powdered cellulose
AIN-93G Mineral mixture
AIN-93 Vitamin mixture
Choline bitartrate
Butterfat
Tert-butylhydroquinone
Total calorie ( kcal/100g)
HFD-60 (Oriental, g / 100g)
19.82
0.3
3.7458
9.98
34.0
1.0
5.0
3.5
1.0
0.25
20.0
0.0042
529
Supplemental table 1. Related to Figure 1, 3, and 5.The composition of HFD used in this study